Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This talk page is for discussing the reliability of sources for use in video game articles. If you are wondering if a video game source is reliable enough to use on Wikipedia, this is the place to ask.

When posting a new topic, please add a link to the topic on the Video Game Sources Checklist after the entry for the site. If an entry for the site does not exist, create one for it and include the link to the topic afterward. Also, begin each topic by adding {{subst:find video game sources|...site name...|linksearch=...site URL...}} in order to provide other users with some easily accessible links to check up on the source.


sportacentrs.com (non-English source)

[edit]

Find video game sources: "Sporta Centrs" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk · LinkSearch · LinkTo

SportaCentrs.com (LV Wikipedia) is a Latvian (non-English) media that publishes information about sports and also eSports.

The site was launched in 2002 and they have a professional team of journalists about sports and esports: https://parmums.sportacentrs.com/redakcija.html

VentureBeat

[edit]

I think we should reflect the fact that [venturebeat.com] is largely a website about AI now, and admittedly uses AI in the creation of its articles. I'm not sure if they mark when AI is used in an article, but this doesn't. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 17:19, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just checked out their front page and there is no video game articles at all. I move to suggest VentureBeat being moved to situational. I'll check back here in a moment with the answer to when the cutoff was. CaptainGalaxy 17:24, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I need to do some more research into this, but for now I retract my statement because I may have jumped the gun. CaptainGalaxy 17:35, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Don't get me wrong, AI writing creates some absolute crap, but with what I've read, it feels like most major publications are talking about implementing it in varying degrees. I think we'd end up throwing out the majority of our RS's if we simply throw out anything that merely touches AI. Sergecross73 msg me 17:51, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's a bit more embarrassing on my part. I initially approached this because I hadn't read VentureBeat in ages and I thought they stopped writing GamesBeat articles, and on first glance I literally couldn't see the tab for GamesBeat on the VB main page. It wasn't I did a double take when looking into it I realised they still do gaming content. That being said, I will say we should exercise caution here just in case they decided to push their advancement forward on using AI. But I do agree with you here, Serge, as whilst upon reading about an interview about how they use AI and looking articles, I'm not seeing anything particularly wrong. So unless something is brought to the attention of this talk page, I shall refrain from making an argument from making VB a situational source, though with clarification that we should still keep a watchful eye on their usage of AI. CaptainGalaxy 19:51, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My news apps show articles from VB relatively frequently and I haven't noticed a dip in quality or any of the usual problematic trappings of AI writing. What is it in your example article that's causing you concern? It looks like its credited to being authored by a human named Ben Dickson? Sergecross73 msg me 17:26, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will admit that it was a kneejerk assumption, but I'm of the opinion that a website that uses AI in article creation should inherently be given greater scrutiny, especially since I'm seeing nothing on the website actually discussing how they use AI and how they ensure accuracy in the content the AI produces, even here. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 20:08, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't disagree with more scrutiny, I'm just saying, if they were considered an RS previously, and there's no noticeable change in quality or discernible issue (noticed errors, weird wording, hallucinations, etc) it wouldn't be enough, in my eyes, to cause a change in classification. Sergecross73 msg me 20:14, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I try to avoid VB if the article seems overtly promotional, but like, if there's a Dean Takahashi tagline, I usually think that that's fine. I would definitely not consider it a reliable source all the time, not that it should be discouraged, but should be used with caution. Masem (t) 21:54, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, I'm not promoting demoting it, just that it's worth clarifying this. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 22:26, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

VidaExtra

[edit]

Find video game sources: "VidaExtra" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk · LinkSearch · LinkTo

Hi, I've been told to seek evaluations of the reliability of VidaExtra here, since it was last assessed in 2019, so any would be appreciated. Thanks. PrimalMustelid (talk) 23:32, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DSOGaming

[edit]

Find video game sources: "DSOGaming" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk · LinkSearch · LinkTo

Last reviewed in 2012 here.

Going through the issues mentioned there:

>Fairly new site

Now more than a decade old.

>no staff or review process information that I could find

staff page here: https://www.dsogaming.com/staff/ It is mainly one full time writer with two others mentioned on that page having contributed this year.

>absolutely plastered in advertisements

I disabled Ublock to test this and strangely I didn't see any advertisements at all. I also tried multiple networks to make sure I didn't have Network-level blocking enabled. It seems the website is mainly supported by Patreon.

DSOG has had interviews with NVIDIA, IdTech, CD Projekt, Unity and CryTek as well as with researchers (eg). You can see the list here: https://www.dsogaming.com/category/interviews/

Interestingly, DSOG seems to be sourced in a few books/journals. The most notable of which is "Moral Rights and Mods: Protecting Integrity Rights in Video Games" published in University of British Columbia Law Review, Volume 46, Issue 3, by Michela Fiorido (university page) which can be viewed here and "Violent Games: Rules, Realism and Effect" in Approaches to Digital Game Studies Volume 3 published by Bloomsbury Academic and authored by Gareth Schott, who is a professor and researcher at University of Waikato (university page, publications)

Here is the relevant quote from Schott (pp. 158-159):

the extent of the input required to generate an outcome, proves relevant to definitions of interactivity as “either the performer’s actions affecting the computer’s output, or the computer’s action affecting the performer’s output” (Garnett 2001). With reference to the latter, gaming software again becomes relevant in the evaluation of performance. Take, for example, Dark Side of Gaming’s PC performance analyses of games, and consider Papadopoulos’s (2014) review of Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare:

While the game came with somewhat low CPU requirements, it listed 6GB of RAM as its minimum RAM requirement. Contrary to COD: Ghosts’ Story, however, Advanced Warfare really needs more than 4GB of RAM . . . the actual game used more than 3.6GB of RAM. This suggests that even if PC gamers find a way to run this title with 4GB of RAM, they will face major stuttering issues . . . In order to find out whether this title can be played with constant 60fps on a variety of PC systems, we simulated a dual- core, a tri- core and a quad-core system. All of the aforementioned systems were able to push constant 60fps. However, we do have to note that on our simulated dual-core system there were noticeable stuttering issues that went away as soon as we enabled Hyper Threading.

DSOG also appears as the source for the Giant Pink Scorpion in Giant Pink Scorpions: Fighting Piracy with Novel Digital Rights Management Technology by Andrew V. Moshirnia (university page) in DePaul Journal of Art, Technology& Intellectual Property Law Volume 23 Issue 1: (pdf)

Croteam, developer of the Serious Sam first person shooter ("FPS") franchise, inserted such whimsical obstacles into its game Serious Sam 3: Before First Encounter.[201] As Sam "Serious" Stone, the player takes control of a wide arsenal of weapons to fight a variety of monsters. If the game detects an unlicensed copy, it triggers a giant, invincible, pink scorpion armed with two shotguns that relentlessly hunts the player.

In general, if you look at the citations DSOG receives in academic works, it is generally about technical details such as modding, performance, and DRM. There are some more citations on Google Scholar but I did not go through all of them.

Lastly, the previous discussion seems to be about using DSOG for game reviews ("no review process information I could find"). I am not suggesting here that we use DSOG for reviews, only certain technical details.

The reason I bring this up is that DSOG goes into more technical detail than most video game news sources, especially in the field of game engines. For example it is the only site that reported on GameTrailers' interview with Tim Sweeney about Unreal Engine 4's abandoning of Sparse Voxel Octree Global Illumination, which is now unavailable as GameTrailers has been shut down for years. (For the record, I did not add that source to UE4, it was already there in the Unreal Engine article and I don't think it should be removed. I did spend a few hours trying to find that interview, however, but to no avail, as it seems not to have been archived, with IA only having archived the page itself and not the video.) And as I mentioned above DSOG does interviews with game engine developers and hardware companies. I think those interviews show both the usefulness and credibility of DSOG, at least in the specific field of game engines, and at least where there is no other source that it can be replaced with.

The particular point I would currently like to source from DSOG is that Ride 5 uses Unreal Engine 4, which no other site has reported. (GamingBolt reports that it uses Unreal Engine). J2UDY7r00CRjH (talk) 02:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For reference this discussion has moved to WP:RSN#dsogaming.com for technical analysis in video games. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 12:29, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mikrobitti

[edit]

Find video game sources: "Mikrobitti" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk · LinkSearch · LinkTo

A Finnish tech/gaming magazine founded in 1984. Since 2015 the magazine has been published by Alma Media, which is among the biggest media companies in Finland. No longer publishes video game reviews with scores, but older issues did carry them until at least 2007. Nowadays the focus appears to be mostly on the online side, though most issues still carry a lone gaming article of 4–6 pages. Do note that all online articles become paywalled some time after their publication.

I don't see any particular reason why this one wouldn't be a reliable source, but asking never hurt anybody. 2001:999:50C:985D:34AD:A972:6E9:F4F4 (talk) 15:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aktueller Software Markt

[edit]

Find video game sources: "Aktueller Software Markt" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Aktueller Software Markt (ASM) is a defunct German gaming magazine active from 1986 to 1995. I was unable to find much about it online, it does not appear to have its own website, and it does not appear to be cited by reliable sources often. Is it reliable? Thanks, QuicoleJR (talk) 18:10, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GamerInfo.NET

[edit]

Find video game sources: "GamerInfo.NET" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk · LinkSearch · LinkTo

I notcied this source in the GA review for Rayman (video game), where it is principally used for release dates. I didn't see it as particularly reliable from a first glance but like to have it vetted more broadly for clarity at the review. IceWelder [] 18:11, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm leaning towards unreliable within the first few minutes of me looking at the site. The most detail we are given through the about page for the site is that it was "created for gamers by gamers" and has no list of staff or editorial policy. And using Alex Novichenko, one of the writers, as an example, it seems that the site allows people who don't normally do journalism to write (based on his Facebook profile that is linked instead of a staff page or a LinkedIn profile, he simply just has experience using Unity). I see no reason why this source would be reliable at first glance, either. λ NegativeMP1 18:19, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    > Alex Novichenko, one of the writers
    Are there even any other writers? Quick look admittedly, but checking 15 random articles, they're all written by Alex Novichenko.
    The site also has 14 followers on Twitter and 21 on Facebook, which suggests it's not particularly notable.
    Between that, the lack of any editorial policy, and the lack of any obvious indicators of reliability, I'd suggest it's unreliable. DarkeruTomoe (talk) 19:13, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

EssentiallySports

[edit]

Find video game sources: "...EssentiallySports..." – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk · [[Special:Linksearch/https://www.essentiallysports.com/.%7CLinkSearch]] · LinkTo


Found one previous discussion on this. None over at RSN, and I wonder that perhaps even if the WP:VG project deems it unreliable it may be considered usable in other spaces? Unsure. Would like to develop more of a consensus as it's not listed at WP:VG/RS. Noting that it's currently popping up on over 7,000 articles and across a variety of sports articles including very high-profile ones (incl. Stephen Nedoroscik, Sunisa Lee, Max Verstappen, Conor McGregor, Lauren Jackson (a GA), MrBeast, Nathan Chen (also a GA), Josh Allen, and Steve Kerr); also used in articles relevant to the WP:VG project such as Technoblade (2 uses on a GA), Valkyrae, Ludwig Ahgren, Kick (service), KSI. Soulbust (talk) 02:43, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]