Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut:
Purge

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Guide to deletion
Centralized discussion
Proposals: policy other Discussions Ideas

Note: inactive discussions, closed or not, should be archived.

Purge server cache

Contents

David Oxtoby, Artist[edit]

David Oxtoby, Artist (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "David Oxtoby, Artist" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Untractable and unusable biography of an artist who might be notable. A Google search for "David Oxtoby artist" brings up a number of relevant hits about gallery shows and bios at different galleries, but it's not clear from that whether he would pass muster. But even if he does, this current article is such a mess of unverifiable facts that we'd need to blow it up and start completely anew. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:29, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Mayhem Brannigan[edit]

Mayhem Brannigan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Mayhem Brannigan" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Pro wrestler for a new minor wrestling organization. Only coverage is in articles reporting the results of PWR events and they're all from one website. Fails GNG.Mdtemp (talk) 17:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Matt Secor[edit]

Matt Secor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Matt Secor" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

MMA fighter who has one top tier fight and is not currently fighting for a top tier organization. Fails WP:NMMA and GNG since coverage is routine sports reporting.Mdtemp (talk) 16:56, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Green Capital[edit]

Green Capital (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Green Capital" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Does not meet WP:GNG. References are either self-published, promotional, or directory listings. ubiquity (talk) 16:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete, there are mainly promotional sources listed here. As expressed by the nom, this article should be deleted unless someone is willing to find other non promotional sources. At this point this article is not notable enough to be here. --CyberWarfare (talk) 16:31, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Horizon Global Electronics[edit]

Horizon Global Electronics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Horizon Global Electronics" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Fails WP:NCORP. Run-of-the-mill company. Winning one award that is awarded to 100s of companies doesn't make it special. P 1 9 9   16:05, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 16:32, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Roger_González[edit]

Roger_González (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Roger_González" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Auto Biography and Auto Promotional article. No relevance, independent sources, references or objectivity. Coconuto (talk) 15:35, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Naczelnik[edit]

Naczelnik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Naczelnik" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

The article has no essence. The word is a literal translation into Polish of the generic terms "chief" or "head" and nothing beyond that (and nothing in the article suggests that something can be beyond that). The article had references in Polish language, but of course they use the word "nachelnik" wherever the English text would use the word "chief" or "head". - üser:Altenmann >t 15:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Iranian People Party[edit]

Iranian People Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Iranian People Party" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

WP:N: No source available, no indication of significance. Seems a fake party to me. Pahlevun (talk) 15:13, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Harry French Historic Hall[edit]

Harry French Historic Hall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Harry French Historic Hall" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Non-notable dormitory at Loughborough University. Given the odd title (there is nothing historic about this hall), it doesn't really make a useful redirect. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Giovanni Pini[edit]

Giovanni Pini (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Giovanni Pini" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Delete:Promising player who has played a handful of games for the first team of Pallacanestro Reggiana and is a regular for the Italian under age national sides. However he has recieved sparse coverage, of which next to none is in depth or independent (even when he transfered to another team). This is not enugh of this stage to establish notabiliy, case of WP:TOOSOON in my eyes ArmstrongJulian (talk) 15:33, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Adam Pechacek[edit]

Adam Pechacek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Adam Pechacek" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Delete:Promising player who has played a handful of games for the first team of Pallacanestro Reggiana and is a regular for the Latvian under age national sides. However he has recieved sparse coverage, of which next to none is in depth or independent. This is not enugh of this stage to establish notabiliy, case of WP:TOOSOON in my eyes ArmstrongJulian (talk) 15:30, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Artūrs Strautiņš[edit]

Artūrs Strautiņš (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Artūrs Strautiņš" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Delete: Is not a member of the first team, has played a total of 5 minutes over his career in the first division. In effect he's a 16 year-old youth team player, maybe talented but that's not particularly relevant. Has virtually no coverage between stats on the league's page and other specialised websites, none of it in depth (and not a lot independent) ArmstrongJulian (talk) 15:26, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

European Basketball Player of the Year Awards[edit]

European Basketball Player of the Year Awards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "European Basketball Player of the Year Awards" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Delete: All awards barring the one given by Eurobasket.com would pass the notability test but they already have articles and in effect have next to never (if never) been quoted together by a source. Note that the article creator was banned for disruptive editing. ArmstrongJulian (talk) 15:18, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Victorio Pezzolla[edit]

Victorio Pezzolla (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Victorio Pezzolla" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

I am not finding enough sources to establish notability. This article fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 15:18, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 15:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 15:22, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Eurobasket.com's Greek Basketball Hall of Fame[edit]

Eurobasket.com's Greek Basketball Hall of Fame (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Eurobasket.com's Greek Basketball Hall of Fame" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Delete Has no notability whatsoever outside the website who awarded it (itself barely passing notabiliy). Can find no other mentions, even by the awardees. Eurobasket.com is a decent website but that does not mean every single one of its Hall of Fames is notable, they are not. Note that the article creator was banned for disruptive editing ArmstrongJulian (talk) 15:12, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Spencer Thompson[edit]

Spencer Thompson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Spencer Thompson" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Fails WP:NSOCCER with 0 professional appearances and WP:GNG. Any coverage found seems to be WP:ROUTINE. Player does not appear to still be playing. GauchoDude (talk) 15:10, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

All-Europe Player of the Year[edit]

All-Europe Player of the Year (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "All-Europe Player of the Year" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Delete:Despite the glossy title this is just a selection by a sports website, Eurobasket.com, which itself struggles with notability (though to be fair it is a popular basketball website) similar to the end of season All-whatever selections of thousands of websites. It has no notability beyond the website itself (most awardees don't aknowledge the "distinction") with the lack of coverage to boot.}} ArmstrongJulian (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Ritu Agarwal[edit]

Ritu Agarwal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Ritu Agarwal" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Agarwal was a contestant in The Voice India but was eliminated in the third round. As such, she has not reached the level of notability to merit inclusion at Wikipedia. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:53, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Ritu Agarwal cleared five stages of The Voice India TV show, which were:

  • The Blinds
  • The Battles
  • Live Round 1
  • Live Round 2
  • Live Round 3

And was then eliminated. Apart from being the only female in the Top-4 of Team Shaan she was also in the, the winning team of The Voice India). As per the Point 10 of the notability to merit inclusion at Wikipedia, this article should stay on Wikipedia.

Also as an information resource, the contestants of the winning team should have their information on Wikipedia. --Rish404 (talk) 15:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

All-Europeans Player of the Year[edit]

All-Europeans Player of the Year (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "All-Europeans Player of the Year" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Delete:Despite the glossy title this is just a selection by a sports website, Eurobasket.com, which itself struggles with notability (though to be fair it is a popular basketball website) similar to the end of season All-whatever selections of thousands of websites. It has no notability beyond the website itself (most awardees don't aknowledge the "distinction") with the lack of coverage to boot. ArmstrongJulian (talk) 14:50, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Y.H. Ku[edit]

Y.H. Ku (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Y.H. Ku" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Too few citations for an electrical engineer. Google Scholar shows highest citation count of 52 for the article "Volterra-Wiener functionals for the analysis of nonlinear systems". Doesn't pass WP:PROF or WP:GNG either. Solomon7968 14:00, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Solomon7968 14:00, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Solomon7968 14:00, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Gerwyn John[edit]

Gerwyn John (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Gerwyn John" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

An engineer who died young and had a single tram named after him by his employers. Sad, but I can't see any way in which he could possibly be notable. Looks a bit like a memorial/tribute page. Disputed PROD. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Innovative Research Inc.[edit]

Innovative Research Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Innovative Research Inc." – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

I found nothing aside from the Scholar results to suggest improvement and there isn't even that much in this article. This orphan has rarely been edited much less significantly so I hope we can get some attention to this. Inviting tagger Johnanth for comment. SwisterTwister talk 06:00, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

There is hardly anything non-academic either, and I place less emphasis on academic sources than most. One would think the company doesn't even exist from the internet search results. Hence my motion to delete. Yannis A. | 10:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:50, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete The little bit of results are only passing mentions. Fails WP:GNG. Me5000 (talk) 19:59, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 12:57, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Ramtron International[edit]

Ramtron International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Ramtron International" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

My searches found nothing to suggest improvement, here, here, here and here, and it's probably best to redirect to Cypress Semiconductor where it is mentioned but I want to hear from others (I'm willing to close and redirect myself if needed). SwisterTwister talk 06:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:22, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:22, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:22, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak keep - they're notable obviously through bring F-RAM to mass market availability. This then made them a tempting target for an acquisition, which Cypress then did. However notability isn't temporary. We give readers a clearer history through a separate article. At most we'd merge this into Cypress, and then UNDUE becomes a problem to give them appropriate depth of coverage. As F-RAM becomes an increasingly important technology - mainly through the growth in smart metering - we shouldn't shrink our coverage of it. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:37, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. as promotional. The distinguishing feature here is the sections 2 "F-RMA Technology" & section 3, "F-RMA Technology Benefits." This is typical wording of a web age or an advertisement. It has no place in an encycopedia article, because a link does it just as well. Nobody would write it who was trying to describe the company for an encyclopedia. To be sure, we could eliminate it , but it's time we started actually rejecting promotional articles of this sort. Notability is not the only reason for rejection. G11applies if its so promotional it couldn't easily be rewritten, but we can delete here for any reason. The only way to stop this sort of editing is to delete the articles. If the company is important enough, someone with a neutralPOV will write the article--such as Andy. DGG ( talk ) 23:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
AfD is not cleanup. If you think something needs copy-editing, then just go right ahead and do it. There is no virtue to deleting it first. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:50, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 12:57, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Soul Survivor (video game)[edit]

Soul Survivor (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Soul Survivor (video game)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

No evidence of notability. Although I cannot remember the state of the article at the time of the second AfD, and cannot see it as I am not an administrator, there is every indication that this is substantially the same. Launchballer 15:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

This wiki should remain a draft --Sykess (talk) 07:59, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 12:55, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Ray V. Smith[edit]

Ray V. Smith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Ray V. Smith" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

The subject appears to produce calendars featuring musicians. Plenty of refs about the musicians and very peripheral mentions on reproductions of calendars but nothing here that strikes at any significant notability. The reliability and robustness of most of the refs is also questionable. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk   12:51, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Battle of the idiots[edit]

Battle of the idiots (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Battle of the idiots" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Probably a case of WP:TOOSOON. The only hits I could find online are its IMDb page and casting calls. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 13:46, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Spondylitis Association of America[edit]

Spondylitis Association of America (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Spondylitis Association of America" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Although this may not actually be as blatantly promtional as others, I'm concerned about the almost virtually non-existent good solid coverage. I added a sentence about Rico Brogna being a spokesman but that's the best I could add to my best abilities. My searches were here, here, here, here, here and here. This is an interesting subject and I hope someone familiar with this can improve and move this past its current state. Unfortunately, if a move elsewhere is better, there's no target as this is an orphan unless it's mentioned at the AS article. SwisterTwister talk 05:48, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 01:50, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 01:50, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete as proba bly the result of undeclared paid editing. What's diagnostic is the statement of origin & motivation: " Her goal was to get word out about ankylosing spondylitis and help support others with this disease". This is a particularly meaningless example, and nobody would use it who wasn't trying to write according to a bad pattern. DGG ( talk ) 23:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
    • Disagree about paid editing. I can't imagine anyone paying this editor Special:Contributions/Sackofrice, who seems to be the major contributor. I think this is just some well meaning soul trying to improve an article, but based solely on the SAA website. --Derek Andrews (talk) 15:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:50, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 10:15, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 10:15, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 12:13, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep I agree that good references are hard to find, but judging by the number of times their publications are referenced, they are obviously a respected organization. I think a better way forward would be to tag the article for improvement of content and sources. Sadly, I think that references from mainstream media will only be common for organizations that are mired in controversy or some other big story.--Derek Andrews (talk) 15:34, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

World War II: Heroes of Valor[edit]

World War II: Heroes of Valor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "World War II: Heroes of Valor" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Fails WP:GNG. The1337gamer (talk) 11:53, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) The1337gamer (talk) 11:56, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

HSH.com[edit]

HSH.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "HSH.com" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Fails WP:NCORP with no in-depth secondary sources, just a lot of articles quoting HSH.com press releases about mortgage rates, and a few WP:NEWSPRIMARY interview quotes from the vice president. The articles go into no detail about the company itself, such as would be required to source an article describing the company. McGeddon (talk) 11:30, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Colling Gilbert Wright & Carter[edit]

Colling Gilbert Wright & Carter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Colling Gilbert Wright & Carter" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Not notable as I understand it, similar to the Melvin Wright discussion, including same authors. Bjornte (talk) 10:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

I Impact India[edit]

I Impact India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "I Impact India" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Plain advertising, but contested speedy deletion The Banner talk 10:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

I don't think This article is for advertising or promotional. This article is about a non-profit organisation which motivates other corporate companies by their books or presentation to give funds to NGO's as a part of their Corporate Social Responsibility. It also provides consultancy to NGOs to raise more funds to help poors. Besides that, It also does some for-profit works to run their company. I don't think they are doing this for promotions and we should support their good works.They are also supported by some of the big non-profits and NGOs of India.If there is something looking promotional please help me to solve the problem and also help me to learn. ArnabKumarSaha (talk) 11:09, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Delete Is there multiple, reliable and independent coverage of I Impact India? No. It is not notable, the article is clearly written by someone from the organisation that overstates the role of what is in effect a fundraising company. It's claims are not backed up by any sources and the way to "solve the problem" as stated by the PR team member above is to delete the article pure and simple. You can find hundreds of fund-raising companies in London for example that get more coverage than this one, which doesn't make any of them notable. --ArmstrongJulian (talk) 14:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. It all seems like hot air. No evidence that the subject actually does anything, let alone anything notable. Maproom (talk) 15:34, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Wubi 86[edit]

Wubi 86 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Wubi 86" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

This article looks like an product installation instruction, not like an item for encyclopedae. After reading it, I could not find any description on what wubi 86 is, or what is the difference between Wubi and Wubi 86, and most of all there is no source at all. — GoldenQR (talk) 03:52, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Olly Harmer[edit]

Olly Harmer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Olly Harmer" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Seemingly promotional article about a person who doesn't really seem to satisfy the GNG. Slashme (talk) 09:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Rev. Fr. Dr. Jesu Pudumai Doss[edit]

Rev. Fr. Dr. Jesu Pudumai Doss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Rev. Fr. Dr. Jesu Pudumai Doss" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Person not notable. No references cited and the claim of authoring books could not be found on Google search. (ISBN number also not quoted by author). Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 07:57, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Miyoko Akashi[edit]

Miyoko Akashi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Miyoko Akashi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

last AfD 2 years ago was no consensus. But I notice a number of keep voters used an incorrect assumption of inherent notability which is not true. Secondly the Japanese coverage found was shown to be limited. LibStar (talk) 07:55, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Orangemoody/Articles. T. Canens (talk) 16:07, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Tile Depot[edit]

Tile Depot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Tile Depot" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

A company with very little notability online regarding its operations, especially as I am not seeing much in the way of links. This article was created by a sock as part of the Orangemoody paid editing thing, as well. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:35, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Absa Komal[edit]

Absa Komal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Absa Komal" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Fails notability criteria. We can't have articles on every newscaster.  sami  talk 05:31, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Delete --Musa Talk  07:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Darksong Chronicles[edit]

Darksong Chronicles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Darksong Chronicles" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Newly released Windows game app. Unable to find independent, reliable refs, only social media. Not exactly sure what the article is. Looks more appropriate for Wikia. Prod removed. Announced on the game's Facebook page that the article is up and anybody can edit. Series of SPAs have been editing. Bgwhite (talk) 05:19, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete per above. I can't find anything to show that this game passes notability guidelines. The majority of the hits are comprised of the game's creators posting around trying to drum up interest. I wish them well, but this is just too soon for an entry. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:31, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Lefteris Choutesiotis[edit]

Lefteris Choutesiotis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Lefteris Choutesiotis" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested on the grounds that he has played for the Greek U-19 team, and that he has been an unused substitute for Olympiacos. Both of these reasons are explicitly excluded as sources of notability per WP:NFOOTBALL. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:34, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following article for the same reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Kostas Tsimikas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) ‹See Tfm›

Find sources: "Kostas Tsimikas" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR · free images · wikipedia library

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Not only is he a Greek U-19 international player ([1], [2]), he is also included in Olympiacos F.C. players' list for the 2015-2016 UEFA Champions League [3] and he has won 2 Greek Championships, 1 Greek Cup and 1 Double with Olympiacos: Choutesiotis Trophies: Super League Winner 2x: 2014/2015, 2013/2014, Greek Cup Winner 1x: 2014/2015. He has won two titles in a fully pro league, which is a very important source of notability. 10:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Tsimikas is a Greek U-19 international player (Hellenic Football Federation - Kostas Tsimikas) and he has won 1 Greek Championship, 1 Greek Cup and 1 Double with Olympiacos: Tsimikas Trophies: Super League Winner 1x: 2014/2015, Greek Cup Winner 1x: 2014/2015. He has won a Championship title, a Cup title and a domestic Double in a fully pro league, which is a very important source of notability. Gtrbolivar (talk) 10:58, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Human Rights Award of Korea[edit]

Human Rights Award of Korea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Human Rights Award of Korea" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

No third-party reliable sources to indicate how this award meets WP:GNG notability. One of several walled-garden-ish articles created by a blocked sockpuppet apparently part of an attempt to promote a recipient of this award. OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:14, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Laurence Moskowitz[edit]

Laurence Moskowitz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Laurence Moskowitz" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Does not meet notability criteria. Charlie the Pig (talk) 04:11, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Korea Federation of Talent[edit]

Korea Federation of Talent (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Korea Federation of Talent" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

No third-party reliable sources to indicate how this award meets WP:GNG notability. One of several articles created by a blocked sockpuppet apparently part of an attempt to promote a recipient of this "award." OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:09, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete - I should've done this myself once the PROD was removed. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Talent Medal of Korea[edit]

Talent Medal of Korea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Talent Medal of Korea" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

No third-party reliable sources to indicate how this award is notable; article was created by banned sock/promotional account. Prod was disputed. OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:07, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Keep All sources are published by ministries of South Korean government. How can you say why this is not notable? Some recipents include Yuna Kim, famous figure skater, which indicates this medal acquired a least notablity. -- Shyoon1 (talk) 04:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Comment I can give the "Ohnoitsjamie Cool Person of the Year Medal" to Vanilla Ice. That doesn't make it a notable award. OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

KACL (Frasier)[edit]

KACL (Frasier) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "KACL (Frasier)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Non-notable fictional radio station. TrueCRaysball | #RaysUp 03:49, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Grorudalen Optical Observatory[edit]

Grorudalen Optical Observatory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Grorudalen Optical Observatory" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Small-time observatory with only some geocities websites to even show that it exists. Does not appear to meet GNG. Primefac (talk) 03:00, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete. The observatory has gotten some credit in scientific journals. Unfortunately there are simply no reliable sources available that can verify the information in the article, or that someone could use to improve it. DPRoberts534 (talk) 05:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Candice Guardino[edit]

Candice Guardino (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Candice Guardino" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Doesn't appear to meet the notability guideline for biographies; tagged since June. Slashme (talk) 21:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 22:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

David Menkin[edit]

David Menkin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "David Menkin" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Many very minor roles is not the equivalent of a notable career. DGG ( talk ) 01:57, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:26, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect somewhere such as Thunderbirds Are Go which seems to be the best as he's quite common as a voice actor and I'm familiar with him. Searches find several results for his work but maybe not something for a better article. SwisterTwister talk 02:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Greg McKeown (author)[edit]

Greg McKeown (author) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Greg McKeown (author)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Person that does not meet WP:GNG. The list of public speaking engagements is unreferenced. With a couple of exceptions, the "Journal articles" section is a collection of blog posts. The content about his book is mostly promotional in nature, as few if any edtiorial reviews are provided. A snapshot with Tony Blair is offered without context or verifiability. This topic includes a plug for McKeown's executive and leaderhip training services, and claims he's a "social innovator", whatever that might be.

I'm not finding references to support the claims made in this article, so I don't think toning it down and editing is a viable alternative to deletion -- the subject simply doesn't meet WP:GNG.

NB: I've nominated this author's book, Essentialism: The Disciplined Pursuit of Less. Mikeblas (talk) 01:56, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

  • I'm going to try to clean this up since I do think that he may be notable, however the article as it was written was absolutely terrible, to the point where I'd say it's a great example as to why you should not pay to get your article written for you. There's no way that this article wasn't written by someone without a conflict of interest. I've removed the list of "journal articles" since Mike is right - most of them were glorified blog posts. I've changed this to just "articles" and named a few places he's published, since traditionally we don't list every article someone has written - typically these are only listed if the articles are frequently cited in various RS. I'm also going to remove some of the pictures, since they just emphasize the puffy tone to the article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:07, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • I've boiled it down to its essentials. I'm somewhat leery of leaving some of the sources behind, as many of them are just dates for newspaper publications. Now this doesn't mean that they can't be useful since sources don't have to necessarily be online, but given that the article's creator has used some pretty unreliable sources in an attempt to source the article, I have to say that I'm kind of uneasy about how much usable content might be in these sources. I'll leave it up to the closing admin as to whether or not we should use them, based on how WP:PUFFY the article initially was and the usage of various primary and otherwise unusable sources in both this article and the book's article. Hopefully I'll be able to find more sources to make this a moot point. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:18, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep. I've managed to pull together just enough coverage for his book to where we could probably argue for a keep on his writing. I'd recommend having an article for McKeown rather than for the book since some of the book sources are sort of more about him in general rather than the book specific (ie, they talk about his idea rather than specifically the book) and it's usually easier to justify an article for a person rather than for a book. I don't think that we need individual articles in this situation. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Essentialism: The Disciplined Pursuit of Less[edit]

Essentialism: The Disciplined Pursuit of Less (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Essentialism: The Disciplined Pursuit of Less" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

I don't believe this book meets WP:NBOOK. The article, even after a bit of editing, rings of advertising. No reviews are provided towards notability, and I'm not having too much luck finding substantial coverage in recognized outlets. Searching is a bit tedious as I'm tripping over interviews and placement pieces for the authors PR campaign. (Note that this article was edited by the same three or four authors (in the same order?!) that the author's page was. Further, I'm nominating that page for deletion, too.)

The article offers the claim that the book was #4 on an Amazon.com list of picks for 2014, which I was able to reference. However, Amazon's clear goal is selling books -- not editorial review or academic analysis and therefore doesn't confer notability. The article further claims the book was "a NYT and WSJ best seller". It hit #7 on the specialized NYT "Advice & Misc." list for the week of May 4, 2014.[4] It is not on the May 11 or the April 27 lists. Mikeblas (talk) 01:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Comment. Bestseller lists can give notability now, but the general consensus was that only the main lists (fiction, non-fiction) would give notability. Places like Amazon would not count towards notability at all because it's a merchant site and extremely difficult to verify. I'm seeing some light coverage, but I think that I'll probably just endorse a redirect to the author's article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:39, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Greg McKeown. There are a handful of reviews, but the coverage here is so light that I think that we could probably just sum this up in the author's article, which admittedly needs to be completely rewritten, so this will just be one more thing to throw on to the pile of things that needs to be done with the article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:47, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Road to Keiji Muto Tournament[edit]

Road to Keiji Muto Tournament (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Road to Keiji Muto Tournament" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Fails WP:GNG. Random tournament for rookie wrestlers none of whom are notable enough for their own articles. No indication this is an annual tournament as stated in the article. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 13:47, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 13:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:40, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

List of PLC manufacturers[edit]

List of PLC manufacturers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "List of PLC manufacturers" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

WP:NOTDIR. This is a simple business directory, with no encyclopedic scope or additional annotation. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:22, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 02:24, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NOTDIR. Pburka (talk) 03:22, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Why nominate for deletion when you can simply add the items that you believe are missing on this list to make it encyclopedic? Why discard a list that 118 distinct authors have contributed to? Ottawahitech (talk) 12:58, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Question to Andy Dingley and User:Pburka can you please be more specific about WP:NOTDIR: which section are you relying on as a reason for deleting this article? Ottawahitech (talk) 21:46, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
There is no encyclopedic content in this article beyond the bare listing of company names. There is no external referencing. Most of the names here aren't even linked. Just what useful information does that convey to the reader of an encyclopedia? Andy Dingley (talk) 22:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 23:43, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep I removed all advertising and anything that didn't have a wikipedia article. There are many lists on Wikipedia as long as it contains links to wikipedia articles I don't see a problem. Me5000 (talk) 00:14, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

I Turn to You (George Jones song)[edit]

I Turn to You (George Jones song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "I Turn to You (George Jones song)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Song doesn't meet WP:NSONG, and through searches on News, Highbeam, Books and JStor, nothing but a very few trivial mentions, so it doesn't meet WP:GNG either. I'd say merge to Wine Colored Roses, except there is very little here that could be used in the other article. Onel5969 TT me 22:43, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 23:47, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:46, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Keep The single meets, WP:NALBUMS #2 "The single or album has appeared on any country's national music chart." and was released on 5 albums.[5] The article is not an orphan, and I have a couple of references to add. 009o9 (talk) 05:18, 2 September 2015 (UTC) Additional comment I've added a couple of references, and again, this is an officially released Single, which falls under WP:NALBUMS, not WP:NSONG (ie a track from an LP, which was not released as a single, would be considered a song). The Single charted, was published for radio and undoubtedly was in radio rotation, seeing how George Jones was already a Grammy Award winner[6] and had 13 number one Coungry hits at that time. Additionally, let's consider WP:DISCRIMINATE, somebody put a lot of work into creating this collection as evidenced by the horizontal infobox in the footer. 009o9 (talk) 06:47, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Comment - that's why there are two criteria - one for albums (which this is not), and one for singles, which this is. Where you quote from is the generic test, and refers to either albums and singles, before breaking it down into the individual criteria. It makes no sense that EVERY single on a notable album has inherited notability from the album's notability. And while I respect the effort, this is simply about notability. Which this single doesn't qualify. The guideline is quite specific, "A single requires its own notability, and that notability is not inherited and requires independent evidence." Onel5969 TT me 13:03, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Response the single has its own notability, #26 on the Country charts (passes WP:NALBUMS #2 for notability). According to AllMusic, the song is also notable, because it appeared on five albums including the RIAA Gold Record and four additional greatest hits albums from other major labels (passes WP:NALBUMS #5 for notability). I'm also very sure that the single passes WP:NALBUMS #6 for Top 40 radio rotation, but that would probably have to come from another editor who might own hardcopy for data on those spins. I would not be opposed to a merge, if you did the work, maintained a redirect to the new section (in the album article), retain the references I provided and the single infobox for its informative value. I think it is ridiculous, to nominate these established articles, with complete disregard to how many redlinks it creates. Additionally, simply providing a redirect to the root of the parent article, is not encyclopedic, nor what the reader expects when following a link. 009o9 (talk) 17:05, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

The Survivors Club[edit]

The Survivors Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "The Survivors Club" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Does not appear to meet notability standards WP:NN. Site was launched and failed in 2009. Relaunched in 2010 with Hearst media. No pages on Wayback machine. Baed on reddit links, looks like in closed in 2011 https://www.reddit.com/domain/thesurvivorsclub.org/
The only verifiable references are: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/29805845/#.Vd40HCiA3kc (incidental mention)
http://www.prlog.org/10930504-hearst-magazines-digital-media-launches-thesurvivorscluborg-on-its-proprietary-platform.html (press release) Wiki-psyc (talk) 22:04, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 10:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 10:10, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Unfortunately delete for now as although the article is sourced, it could be better and my searches found results mostly for the book, not the website. SwisterTwister talk 05:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:46, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

DJ Limitless[edit]

DJ Limitless (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "DJ Limitless" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Fails general notability: minimal coverage; possibly promotional. Blackguard 21:10, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 22:09, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - This artist isn't notable enough for having a page now. Maybe he'll do fine in the future, but he's just starting out now basically. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 23:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

The Collectin[edit]

The Collectin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "The Collectin" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

I had a good long scan of sources and a good think of whether to bring this article here or not, but I can't seem to find too much that puts this on the right side of notability. Use this case sensitive search so searches don't get piled up with a protein. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 19:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment: No opinion on notability, but I did remove all of the merchant sources. You don't really need those to establish that something was released via VOD. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment Here's my rundown on the remaining sources:
So far I'm leaning towards a merge and redirect to Alden Ehrenreich, given that his article is fairly short and could contain this information quite easily. I'll see what I can find, though, before making a final decision. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect to Alden_Ehrenreich#The_Collectin. This actually didn't take long because a search made it fairly clear that what is currently on the article is really all that's out there. Merging this into Ehrenreich's article would be the best outcome here since the group is close to passing on its own, but isn't really enough to fully pass criteria. From what I can see, the group's main claim to fame is that Ehrenreich is one of its founding members and since notability is WP:NOTINHERITED by Ehrenreich's independent notability, the merge/redirect is the best outcome. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:58, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

John Gosse[edit]

John Gosse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "John Gosse" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Professor does not pass the WP:Professor test. His merits as seen in the page are not extraordinary in the sense he would be a major figure in geology or any science. Lappspira (talk) 17:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:03, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:03, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nova Scotia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:03, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:03, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep. Normally I would say that the Canada Research Chair is a pass of WP:PROF#C5, but that criterion is really only intended to handle the case of chairs given to full professors. In this case he was given it at the same time that he was promoted from assistant professor to associate, and now (14 years later) he is strangely still stuck at the associate level. Nevertheless, I think his citation record [7] is clearly good enough for WP:PROF#C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:44, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Im starting to have dubts. The nomination was made with the information available in the article page. But now I see he has a "Canada Research Chair" and appears, by citations, to be an authority on a topic. Lappspira (talk) 09:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Winjit[edit]

Winjit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Winjit" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

non notable. The reference pretended to be an article in The Hindu is marked on their site as a press release. The siliconindia article isn;'t marked, but that's what it is also. DGG ( talk ) 17:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 17:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — CutestPenguinHangout 17:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete for now - It's worth noting this article was actually deleted in 2008 by Jimfbleak as G11 and my searches find nothing to suggest better sourcing and notability with results such as this, this and this. SwisterTwister talk 18:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:44, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Pathpartner Technology[edit]

Pathpartner Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Pathpartner Technology" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

non notable. Interesting wording from the single purpose account who contributed the article : "Pathpartner seems to provide product engineering services", "Pathpartner has been seen working closely with semiconductor companies"-- Isee that as an attempt to pretend to be nonpromotional. Awards are very minor. DGG ( talk ) 17:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete for now as my first searches instantly found PR and other self-generated content here and at browser. SwisterTwister talk 18:19, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Sophie Albert[edit]

Sophie Albert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Sophie Albert" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Delete: as insufficiently notable actress. Quis separabit? 17:28, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete Her only accomplishment at this point is winning a reality show in the Philippines. Fails WP:NACTOR. Me5000 (talk) 20:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

The HodgeTwins[edit]

The HodgeTwins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "The HodgeTwins" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Blatantly failing general notability, this article is a puff piece that includes phrases such as "the twins display an exceptional knowledge" and "play an important role in bringing information". Only solid source I found is this one, and there is certainly no extensive coverage about them in reliable sources. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 17:21, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete: non-notable; just being identical twins does not confer notability. Quis separabit? 17:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 17:46, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment: The article doesn't exist because they are twins. There is a case for notability here, also saw [8].--Milowenthasspoken 16:47, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Jourdan Younis[edit]

Jourdan Younis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Jourdan Younis" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

not notable as academic or businessman. "worked on" is a term that can mean anything-- DGG ( talk ) 17:08, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 00:51, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Not That Funny[edit]

Not That Funny (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Not That Funny" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Was PROD'd and author contested. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS. A non-notable, non-charting song. Azealia911 talk 21:37, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Only released in a small number of countries and didn't chart in any of them. Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:59, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 02:23, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Was performed on several Fleetwood Mac tours and the article does have a number of sources. Dobbyelf62 (talk) 03:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
A song being performed on tour, no matter how many times, isn't notable if the people performing it are the people who released it. Like all of the recent Fleetwood Mac stub articles I've AfD'd, the articles sources are all currently concerning the album it's from or a concert that gives the song a passing mention. Per WP:NSONGS "If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created." Although not explicitly required, it'd be nice to see at least one source entirely devoted to the song, as opposed to album reviews and concert reviews. Azealia911 talk 04:28, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Is there anything I can do to help the article Azealia911? Dobbyelf62 (talk) 12:17, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Not in my opinion no, had I thought the article could be improved I probably wouldn't have AfD'd it. Unless you find some reliable, third-party, independent sources that aren't album or concert reviews. Azealia911 talk 12:25, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

@Azealia911: I'll see what I can do. Is Rattlesnake Shake any better? I still have some additional sources just in case. Dobbyelf62 (talk) 12:43, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 16:31, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Twisted (Stevie Nicks song)[edit]

Twisted (Stevie Nicks song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Twisted (Stevie Nicks song)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Was PROD'd and author contested. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS. A non-notable, non-charting song. Azealia911 talk 21:37, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 02:24, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 16:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Keep Newly discovered information shows song charted in Canada. - Visnvoisnvo

While the song charting does give it some solid ground, it isn't automatically a means of notability. Note that while WP:NSONGS states that songs are probably notable if they've charted, they should also be " the subject[1] of multiple, non-trivial[2] published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label." and alls I'm currently seeing is links to Fleetwood Mac fan forums and AllMusic, not one review, or reliable third-party source that discusses the song. Azealia911 talk 22:45, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Comment The Fleetwood Mac "Ledge" forum and the site it's based on are not reliable sources. I've said it often enough so I'm just going to remove them where I see them. This article is heading for a delete from me if there aren't going to be any proper sources which discuss the actual song. A crappy chart placing isn't really enough in this case. Bretonbanquet (talk) 13:33, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

MOOEC[edit]

MOOEC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "MOOEC" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

I declined a speedy on this for blatant spam, but nonetheless don't think it's an appropriate article subject. While the list of references superficially looks impressive, upon reviewing them, I can't find a single one that even mentions the subject "MOOEC", let alone covers it in sufficient depth to allow for an article. The article appears to be based mainly, if not entirely, on original research, and given that a search for secondary sources specifically covering this subject comes up empty, there's no way to fix that. Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:27, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 17:24, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 17:24, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 17:25, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - most of the article is about MOOCs rather than about this particular course. Most of the references in the article predate the existence of MOOEC, and the only ref that actually is about the article subject is the MOOEC website. Since the article has existed since January 2014 and there is still no coverage in secondary sources, it simply doesn't seem to be notable. --bonadea contributions talk 14:47, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 16:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Largest population centres in the European Union[edit]

Largest population centres in the European Union (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Largest population centres in the European Union" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

There is List of largest cities of the European Union by population within city limits, List of urban areas of the European Union, and List of larger urban zones of the European Union. Why do we need another article just for the 15 largest cities? I recommend redirecting this page to a new article named Lists of cities in the European Union, which would include links to the articles above, as well as any others. Rob984 (talk) 17:31, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:06, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:06, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 16:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete This content should be merged into an existing article, but since the article is just a summary of a single source, this might only involve adding the source to the References section of an existing article. In proposing deletion, I'm not saying that this article uses the wrong criteria and the existing articles use a better criteria; I'm just saying the existing articles are already better developed, so anyone who wants to further develop this topic should add their data to, and edit, existing articles rather than starting a new article for their data. Gronky (talk) 15:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Virtual Reality (play)[edit]

Virtual Reality (play) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Virtual Reality (play)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

The play is not published or available for production. The only source is a primary source, and a quick internet search didn't find any others.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Hoof Hearted (talk) 17:19, 19 August 2015 (UTC) Hoof Hearted (talk) 17:19, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete or redirect to Alan Ayckbourn (which would probably be best) as my searches found nothing particularly good but probably enough to for redirect, here and here (these two the best results I found). SwisterTwister talk 06:13, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 16:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Cruel Sky (novel)[edit]

Cruel Sky (novel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Cruel Sky (novel)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

There is no evidence either here on in the Ukrainian article that the novel is notable. An earlier book of his apparently reached no.2 in a book store list. There is no evidence this one did. The 2nd and 3rd sections here are completely uncited. section 2 would appear unciteable. There's nothing additional in the Uk article that could be used. No need for a merge as its already covered adequately on the article on the author. DGG ( talk ) 16:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment - I'll look for sources and see if it meets notability for books. МандичкаYO 😜 05:38, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep meets GNG. He appears to be a very popular author in Ukraine, sufficient coverage of his new book. I've added sources and cleaned it up. Also very odd connection to a real crash that brought more interest in the book (and apparently even bizarre conspiracy theories) - in his novel, a Ukrainian jet collides with a snowplow and crashes at a French airport; two months after the book came out, a French jet collided with a snowplow at a Russian airport, killing everyone on board. МандичкаYO 😜 00:03, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

America/Juneau[edit]

America/Juneau (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Juneau" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

No evidence this is a notable topic, simply an identifier code as unencyclopedic database listings. Test nom for the 200+ articles in Category:tz database, none of which have outside references establishing notability as individual articles. Could all definitely be redirected to List of tz database time zones, though it's a lot to do by hand. Reywas92Talk 15:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Which article did you nominate for deletion? The target is a redirect to Juneau, Alaska and has stayed redirect since 2009.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Oh, I see, it is America/Juneau. I modified the nomination accordingly.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:12, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment. It seems to me that this kind of detailed information about time zones is encyclopedic and appropriately included as a part of Wikipedia's gazetteer function. The data could be collected in an article compiling the content of multiple articles, but this would be an editorial decision; I don't think deleting this information outright would improve the encyclopedia. --Arxiloxos (talk) 01:08, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alaska-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Merge/redirect somewhere per Arxiloxos, as I agree that this helps to achieve our gazetteer function. However, the naming convention and its context as a standalone article are confusing to me. Furthermore, it may very well mislead people into thinking that Southeast Alaska is in a separate time zone. That area was joined with the Alaska Time Zone over three decades ago; prior to that, it was in the Pacific Time Zone. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 07:18, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Question – I just went through Category:Tz time zones in the United States, which contains 19 other articles exactly like this one, including several instances of titles containing underscores instead of spaces. Is this really the only article we're discussing, or does this discussion pertain to all of the articles in that category? RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 14:27, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Pangenom[edit]

Pangenom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Pangenom" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Probably not a notable concept. Even ignoring the misspelling of the title of the article, repeated by its author in his every use of the word here and in correspondence, it isn't clear that this is any more than one writer's personal conception, itself, in turn, just a generalization of the concepts already discussed at Pan-genome. I didn't locate any discussion of this version of the concept by anybody else. —Largo Plazo (talk) 14:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

An additional note: The article was created by User:Georgetets (with an "s"). The person whose paper he cites is V.V. Tetz (with a "z"), who appears to be Victor V. Tetz, who has written other papers on genomes—in collaboration with a George Tetz, also with a "z". Make of it what you will. —Largo Plazo (talk) 15:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 15:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - The name is misspelled (the single quoted reference calls it 'pangenome') and the WP article is terribly written. After a look at Google Scholar, my impression is that the article currently presented as "Pangenom" is a concept proposed 10 years ago that took no apparent hold in the field of molecular biology and therefore made no impact, so it lacks notoriety. All the sources in the literature I saw, use the term pangenome (or pan-genome) in the context of the sum of all the genes in a given species, in a clade or even in a Kingdom. BatteryIncluded (talk) 07:00, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Arukas Cup Six Man Tag Tournament[edit]

Arukas Cup Six Man Tag Tournament (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Arukas Cup Six Man Tag Tournament" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Fails WP:GNG. Random one-night six-man tag team tournament with no significance. No indication this is an annual tournament as stated in the article. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 13:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 13:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Novus (professional wrestling)[edit]

Novus (professional wrestling) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Novus (professional wrestling)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Fails WP:GNG. Not a notable professional wrestling group. Lasted for half a year, before disbanding and achieved nothing in those months. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 13:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 13:54, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:40, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Road to Keiji Muto Tournament[edit]

Road to Keiji Muto Tournament (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Road to Keiji Muto Tournament" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Fails WP:GNG. Random tournament for rookie wrestlers none of whom are notable enough for their own articles. No indication this is an annual tournament as stated in the article. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 13:47, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 13:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:40, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Lord Rhidian Crichton-Stuart[edit]

Lord Rhidian Crichton-Stuart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Lord Rhidian Crichton-Stuart" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Genealogy Project, not notable. Does not fulfill WP:NRVE Surgent (talk) 13:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:40, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Armory (software)[edit]

Armory (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Armory (software)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

No good refs - just own web site, a forum and what appears to be a system spec. Not notable. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk   13:01, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 13:11, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:40, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Darker (song)[edit]

Darker (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Darker (song)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Didn't chart. I tried to redirect with explanation, was reverted without explanation, so bringing here instead. Dennis Brown - 10:00, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 11:06, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep. A song or single doesn't have to be a huge hit to be notable. It's single that is off of a very popular album, it followed two other hit singles, On the Regular, Call It Off, by this same artist, Shamir. It's notable enough for that and has enough media coverage to be notable. Neptune's Trident (talk) 17:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:09, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:40, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Halil Özgür[edit]

Halil Özgür (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Halil Özgür" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Fails WP:BIO. Only search results are linkedin. CSD was removed by an account other than the creator so it has to go to AFD. Savonneux (talk) 08:40, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

The person is an executive in a multinational corporation which is handling large scale water and electricity supply projects in Middle East,Africa and Asia. Numerous references can be found.[1][2][3][4][5][6] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moustafasallam (talkcontribs) 13:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Your links are bad. Just taking the first one for example though [9] is a press release about the company the company works for and doesn't even pass muster as a WP:RS for the company. It also doesn't even mention that individual by name. I suggest reading WP:BIO for the notability guidelines on inclusion of biographies.--Savonneux (talk) 02:48, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

References

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:39, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Tehnology Services[edit]

Tehnology Services (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Tehnology Services" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Written as a dictionary entry, belongs on Wiktionary and not Wikipedia. If not deleted, should be moved to 'Technology services' instead of the mispelled 'Tehnology Services' SecretName101 (talk) 07:00, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 10:05, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 10:05, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
  • delete (don't even wiktionary) "Technology services are services about technology" isn't even a DICDEF. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:19, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:39, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

The Mannequint[edit]

The Mannequint (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "The Mannequint" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

A case of WP:TOOSOON for this non-notable play Flat Out (talk) 06:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:39, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Changqi village[edit]

Changqi village (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Changqi village" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Unremarkable place. | Naypta opened his mouth at 06:13, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:34, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment article now has local government sources verifying the existence & basic details of the place. See WP:GEOLAND. No obvious merge target, since we don't have an article on the next-higher-up administrative division (Longtian, Hunan). If kept, should probably be moved to Changqi, Hunan or something per WP:NC-ZH#Place names. 58.176.246.42 (talk) 04:02, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Home and Soul[edit]

Home and Soul (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Home and Soul" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Does not pass notability. Anything in news releases are just passing by refs. Lakun.patra (talk) 04:34, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 04:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 04:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - This firm just doesn't seem that notable. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:02, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Bluecorner[edit]

Bluecorner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Bluecorner" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

This sounded like an interesting subject but my searches found nothing at all with News, Books, browser, highbeam, the free library, BBC, The Guardian (aside from the two articles currently listed), SKY News, The Mirror and The Telegraph. In fact, the only links browser found were from 2006 and 2007 and with both company websites now closed, I suspect this closed shortly after this article started especially as there have have hardly been any edits since. At best, the only possibility to save this would be mentioning elsewhere but there's no target. SwisterTwister talk 03:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:43, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:43, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. Apparently never really important; does not seem to be active, so there won't be much more information to be found. DGG ( talk ) 03:31, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Codal[edit]

Codal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Codal" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. No significant coverage in major sources. Extant coverage consists of a minor local announcement and press releases. Ibadibam (talk) 02:32, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 03:08, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 03:08, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 03:08, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

—Not too sure on that. Currently looking into it and already found a few articles from major news sources that could support the article. Also - being a Chicago area tech employee I can vouch for their credibility within the midwestern tech scene. To my knowledge they are one of the major players. Just my two cents. I'll add some references when I get a chance. Thanks! :: RatedR Leg of Lamb 15:19, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Great. Please provide links as soon as you're able. Ibadibam (talk) 18:15, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
@RatedRestricted: Anything? Ibadibam (talk) 00:42, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Not sure essentially until I see any possible improvement and it indeed seems it's locally notable but my searches found nothing particularly good here and here so I'm willing to say draft & userfy for now. SwisterTwister talk 06:28, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 15:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:31, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. I do not think there is even local notability. The links are PR or mentions. DGG ( talk ) 03:44, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

BC Institute of Property Inspectors[edit]

BC Institute of Property Inspectors (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "BC Institute of Property Inspectors" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

My searches found nothing at all to suggest improvement much less independent notability with noting but the ASTTBC website and, considering, this group was founded in 1999, this is something else. This can probably be mentioned at the ASTTBC but, again, there's not much aside from that website. It's not nsuprising this never got coverage as it only existed 10 years and was mainly a subgroup owned by the ASTTBC. With this group closed and no significant edits since December 2008, there's nothing to suggest keeping. SwisterTwister talk 02:08, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. Never was notable. National groups of this sort often are, but not those limited to a province. DGG ( talk ) 03:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Boone Mall[edit]

Boone Mall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Boone Mall" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Two of the three sources are news about the mall flooding and don't count per WP:NOTNEWS. That leaves one article which only contains one short paragraph about the mall. I found one halfway decent source saying the mall was renovated, but could not find any other sources. Fails WP:GNG. Me5000 (talk) 01:26, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Thom Holwerda (editor)[edit]

Thom Holwerda (editor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Thom Holwerda (editor)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

WP:BLP of the managing editor of a website, referenced exclusively to primary sources with not a whit of reliable source coverage to demonstrate that he's notable for anything more than existing. Also probable WP:COI, as it was created by User:Tholwer. As usual, Wikipedia is not a public relations database on which anybody is entitled to post an unsourced profile of themselves for promotional purposes, if reliable source coverage isn't there to support it. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 01:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:59, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:59, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

București Mall[edit]

București Mall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "București Mall" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Only contains 2 sources one of which is a wp:primary source. I can't find any other sources for this mall. Fails WP:GNG Me5000 (talk) 01:04, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirected to List of Teen Wolf episodes. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 14:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Teen Wolf (Season 6)[edit]

Teen Wolf (Season 6) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Teen Wolf (Season 6)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Fails WP:CRYSTALBALL. Eat me, I'm a red bean (discuss)(contribs) 00:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Support deletion: Article already exists here as a redirect to List of Teen Wolf episodes. Alex|The|Whovian 01:03, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect List of Teen Wolf episodes following small case version. Blatant WP:CRYSTAL when (according to the main list) Season 5 isn't finished airing yet. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 13:11, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:35, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Already redirected. Alex|The|Whovian 00:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Antonio Saldías[edit]

Antonio Saldías (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Antonio Saldías" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Article is not clear why he is notable. Having written a few books and mention by his brother in a local small-town newspaper does not confer notability. Antonio Saldías does not pass the professor tests nor the notability guidelines for creative professionals. Sietecolores (talk) 00:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep Nominator is disrupting the project by nominating every Pichilemu-related article he's found. WP:IDONTLIKEIT does apply here. --Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 00:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete an article without any encyclopedic relevance. --Keysanger (talk) 12:31, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

HappyFunCorp[edit]

HappyFunCorp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "HappyFunCorp" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Tagged by DGG for speedy deletion "as an article about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject." Karl Dickman talk 00:19, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete. More precisely, a company with many minor products, none of the individually or collectively notable. The article tries to borrow notability from the major firms that have at one time or another used some of the products, but not everything a notable firm buys is notable. One of Inc's 5000 fastest growing means not yet notable--and not particularly fast-growing either if it doesn't rank higher in that list. The references are mere mentions or PR, or both. They're in my part of Brooklyn, more or less, but that doesn't make them notable either. . DGG ( talk ) 02:07, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Enamul Hoque[edit]

Enamul Hoque (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Enamul Hoque" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Does not appear to meet the criteria at WP:CREATIVE DGG ( talk ) 00:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete as I found nothing to suggest improvement. SwisterTwister talk 06:30, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:32, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:32, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:32, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Julie Restifo[edit]

Julie Restifo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Julie Restifo" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

A succession of very minor roles, and nothing more. DGG ( talk ) 00:10, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete - I found nothing to suggest improvement and none of the linking articles seem convincing enough to move there. SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:32, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:32, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:32, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:32, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Save: I don't know how it was that they came to that conclusion of said that the actress didn't have important roles. But Restifo is well known for his roles in telenovelas La mujer de Judas where stood out as co-star, she was the protagonist of the telenovela "Viva la Pepa" which was produced by Radio Caracas Television, also was a co-star in the telenovela Hay amores que matan, In 1996 starred in the telenovela "La llaman Mariamor". Excuse me but in my opinion the article is very notable, she is a well-known Venezuelan actress.--Philip J Fry (talk) 11:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)