Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Purge

21 March 2017

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Guide to deletion
Centralized discussion
Proposals: policy other Discussions Ideas

For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard.

Purge server cache

Contents

Marty McKenna[edit]

Marty McKenna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Marty McKenna" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:GNG. Absolutely zero reliable sources. The only sources are routine and trivial tabloid coverage such as the banned Daily Mail ( "Ex On The Beach's Jem Lucy enjoys steamy reunion with Marty McKenna"). Zero in-depth coverage, even in tabloids. AusLondonder (talk) 21:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Christopher Coritsidis[edit]

Christopher Coritsidis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Christopher Coritsidis" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

I find nearly only concert listings online, and no substantial coverage meeting WP:GNG, nor anything meeting WP:MUSICBIO. The sources given in the article are all affiliated. I also find very little mention of "Opus 1 Foundation". A Google search for "Samuel K. Friedman Prize" yields only this article and his bio on the Multiple Sclerosis website, so it isn't a major award. Largoplazo (talk) 21:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:47, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:47, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:IAR. I have zero tolerance for this tactic. Will do the necessary moves. NeilN talk to me 21:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Cell Phone Signal Booster[edit]

Cell Phone Signal Booster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Cell Phone Signal Booster" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The references seem to be a mostly/all fake. None of the 8 references are available online. In particular:

  • Reference 3 is just a link to a journalism school.
  • The Saturday Paper is used as reference 5, but the reference says it was the 5 January 2014 edition; the paper began publishing on March 2014 (see our article, and the reference used that confirms the March 2014 launch [1]).
  • Tele-Tech & Electronic Industries Journal is used as reference, but it appears this hasn't been published since 1956 [2].
  • The New York Times article in reference 7 doesn't appear to exist (I'm assuming the title in the reference is a typo, but there are no similarly titled articles); Google shows many, many NYT articles on this subject, but nothing with this date or this author
  • It appears that no such book as reference 8 exists; claims to be published by Houghton Mifflin, but doesn't show up in their web site [3]. Plus, does that really look like a legit book title to you?

In addition to questionable references:

  • The article was created by an SPA who moved an existing page and overwrote the content, rather than create a new page; this is a tactic done to avoid new page patrollers.
  • Promotional in tone.

I'm sorely tempted to just delete this as dishonestly created spam, but the article has been here since 2015 (!) so I guess another week can't hurt. Note to closing admin: if this is a "delete", we should probably remove content, delete Mayawaits' contribs, and move it back to Witt equivalence; there's some history there to preserve that was lost in the page move. And probably a futile block of long-abandoned User:Mayawaits for spamming. Floquenbeam (talk) 21:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Infinite Computer Solutions[edit]

Infinite Computer Solutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Infinite Computer Solutions" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable WP:SOLUTION article. Very light coverage of a routine nature fails WP:CORP. Bri (talk) 20:47, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

WrestleMania 34[edit]

WrestleMania 34 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "WrestleMania 34" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:CRYSTAL. It is an article about a PPV a year away, and the article does not currently have any sources that discuss it at length, and a google search just seems to reveal speculation about a possible match. I claim that until WWE starts announcing matches, which will probably start with the Royal Rumble next January, this article should be a redirect to Wrestlemania, as the only sourced information will be trivial information about the date and location of the event, and speculation.

This article has also been the subject of various editors adding speculation and vandalism, which almost by definition are the only edits we can have until much nearer the event. Silverfish (talk) 20:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC) Silverfish (talk) 20:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete It shouldn't have been created yet and having to fight the vandals on it almost every hour adding fake info is for the birds. The event is over a year away and there is nothing to put for it yet except it's location. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 21:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:43, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:43, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:43, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:43, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete Should be redirected to the main WrestleMania article until at least after this year's Mania. In the past we discussed not creating WrestleMania articles until after the Royal Rumble, when they actually start building to it. Nothing came of it at the time but I agree with Silverfish that this article shouldn't be created until then. In past years we left useless stubs in place for a year and they had to be semi-protected the entire time to avoid speculation and vandalism. That's pretty much all these stubs attract. The little bit we do know about the event is already at WrestleMania so a redirect is sufficient.LM2000 (talk) 21:54, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Mailai Sapthaswarangal[edit]

Mailai Sapthaswarangal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Mailai Sapthaswarangal" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:GNG. Only ref is its own website, and the Gbooks and Gnews searches threw up nothing.
The previous AFD in 2009 considered these concerns, but one editor wondered if there were non-English-language sources, but didn't know how to search for them. I don't understand why the previous AFD was closed as "no consensus", but more than 7 years later, the article is unimproved. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:51, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

A. Scott Britton[edit]

A. Scott Britton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "A. Scott Britton" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

He may be worthy of note for his academic work, but I don't see that he meets the notability guidelines. None of the sources given in the article is an independent reliable source with substantial coverage. As for WP:NACADEMIC, three of his dictionaries have two or three citations each at Google Scholar, though in the case of one of them, all three citations were by one person; and I don't see any indication that he meets any of the other criteria for academics. Largoplazo (talk) 19:46, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Chiaki Ōsawa[edit]

Chiaki Ōsawa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Chiaki Ōsawa" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Barely notable, not many starring roles or anything to write a biography about. Angel Tales - neko no tamami (cat) - supporting, large ensemble Kirara (manga) OVA - Kirara Imai - title character Miami Guns - Nagisa Tojo - supporting Musumet - Midori - main but not a notable title Street Fighter Alpha OVA - Sakura - supporting Negima at Chao Lingshen - supporting (minor classmate) AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:43, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Nasty woman[edit]

Nasty woman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Nasty woman" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTDIC. The article contains some original research. For instance, the references used to prove that the phrase has influenced memes are just passing mentions. A claim about "worldwide news" is outright false, and nothing in the cited source supports the claim. I do not believe there is significant enough coverage to satisfy GNG, as quantity of sources does not imply quality. At least some in-depth coverage should exist to prove notability. I do not see any reason to keep this as a standalone article. Wikipedia is not a phrase book.

Note: I tried to PROD this, but it was removed by @Mark viking because "given all the mainstream sources referenced, non-notability looks controversial and would need a discussion". Ceosad (talk) 19:11, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Tokyo Tower of Babel[edit]

Tokyo Tower of Babel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Tokyo Tower of Babel" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This proposed fantasy building lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to establish notability. A bibliography in the article lists two books. The first book is by the academic who proposed this building so it is not independent. The second book provides no specific page number but is a link to a search within Google Books which doesn't show any Tokyo Tower of Babel so I have no idea why this book is listed. Whpq (talk) 19:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

There is small difference between this article and articles like X-Seed 4000 and Ultimate Tower which are also fantasy buildings without independent reliable sources. There is nothing wrong with the article and it has better quallity than the most of Wikipedia articles. And secondly, this is the tallest buildings EVER envisioned in human history, so the articles is definitely notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheldonium (talkcontribs) 19:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
On Wikipedia something that is not notable doesn't exist. Every knowledge is important, and your attitude to the new articles is in conflict with the fundamental vision of all Wikimedia Projects:
"Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. That's our commitment." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheldonium (talkcontribs) 19:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - This was actually already deleted through AfD back in 2015 (an admin might want to add the earlier discussion to this - you can find a link to it on the article's talk page). Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to show that it passes WP:GNG. The WP:OSE argument in this case is quite weak. Onel5969 TT me 19:50, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
    • The previous AFD is automatically linked in in the AFD box (upper right on my browser). -- Whpq (talk) 20:27, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep the lack of independent reliable sources doesn't means that the article should be deleted--Sheldonium (talk) 21:29, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:35, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:35, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete. Lack of sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC).

Whales & This Lake[edit]

Whales & This Lake (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Whales & This Lake" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND as far as I can tell. Telaneo (User talk page) 19:01, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:33, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:33, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Jour 395[edit]

Jour 395 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jour 395" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Appears to be a course catalog listing. Perhaps this was an attempt to create a course page for Wikipedia:Education program? Didn't seem to fit any of the speedy deletion criteria, but is not notable. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 18:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:31, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:31, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Riki Michele[edit]

Riki Michele (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Riki Michele" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable outside of Gene Eugene. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Mr. Guye (talk) 17:44, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 17:44, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 17:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 17:48, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Viktoria Azovskaja[edit]

Viktoria Azovskaja (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Viktoria Azovskaja" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Miss Universe 2007 is Riyo Mori Miss Universe 2007]. I suggest to delete this page as per WP:A7 Jone Rohne Nester (talk) 17:16, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Redirect to Miss Estonia. I initially tagged the page as a BLP Prod, since there are no sources in the article. While there's a plausible claim of notability in winning a national beauty pageant, if the page cannot be improved, or sourced a redirect to the main pageant wouldn't be a bad resolution. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:21, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:21, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:21, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Michael Brauser[edit]

Michael Brauser (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Michael Brauser" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Notability. I see nothing here but a bloke doing a job, with run-of-the-mill coverage. TheLongTone (talk) 16:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Keep. Michael Brauser is an exceptional businessman. Certainly a business career involving multiple nine-figure exits is notable? This is not a run of the mill guy. His involvement in the inception of the data fusion industry was a catalyst for all the big data companies that exist today. The explosive growth of Naviant, Seisint, Interclick, and Cogint are testaments to his talent and effort. Happy to add more on this if needed.Btaylor902 (talk) 17:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

24AM Studios[edit]

24AM Studios (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "24AM Studios" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Unreferenced article, probably promotional in intent, about seemingly non-notable company probably created by the company's founder. Off with his head! TheLongTone (talk) 16:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Shemira (The Guarding)[edit]

Shemira (The Guarding) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Shemira (The Guarding)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Unremarkable short film. Unable to find any reliable sources. Non-Dropframe talk 16:54, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete. I proposed it for deletion at the exact same time as you started the AfD :-) Fram (talk) 16:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete. Fails WP:NFILM and looks to have WP:SELFPROMOTION problems as well. Might of been speedied as well but I was too slow on tagging the article - too slow on a speedy get it - heehee. MarnetteD|Talk 17:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Christian Lees[edit]

Christian Lees (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Christian Lees" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

relisting as last nomination in jan attracted no votes or comments Non notable actor (fails Wikipedia:Notability (people) for entertainers and WP:GNG). Poorly referenced, falls considerably short of WP:RS standards. Created and majorly contributed to by COI/SPA(s). Identical issue with related article (subject's twin Christian Lees) which is also being AfD'd here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jonah_Lees_(2nd_nomination) Rayman60 (talk) 16:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Jonah Lees[edit]

Jonah Lees (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jonah Lees" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

relisting as last nomination in jan attracted no votes or comments Non notable actor (fails Wikipedia:Notability (people) for entertainers and WP:GNG). Poorly referenced, falls considerably short of WP:RS standards. Created and majorly contributed to by COI/SPA(s). Identical issue with related article (subject's twin Christian Lees) which is also being AfD'd here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Christian_Lees_(2nd_nomination) Rayman60 (talk) 16:51, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Live-action wargame[edit]

Live-action wargame (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Live-action wargame" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Search found no independent notability, so this fails WP:GNG, as tagged since August 2008. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 16:50, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:18, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:18, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Politics as Usual[edit]

Politics as Usual (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Politics as Usual" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Notability. Usually in such cases I would redirect to the artist, but in this case I don't think that most people searching using this phrase would be looking for a hip-hop recording. I guess I could move the article tp Politics as Usual (Album) & then put the created redirect up for deletion. Thoughts?? TheLongTone (talk) 16:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:16, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:16, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Luther Ragsdale[edit]

Luther Ragsdale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Luther Ragsdale" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

A claim of notability here but imo just another pushy nudbnik. Motivational speakers indeed. Ther motivate me to AfD their biogs or leave the room sharpis TheLongTone (talk) 16:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:16, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:16, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:16, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Werewolf Hologram[edit]

Werewolf Hologram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Werewolf Hologram" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Yet another case of an article about an unremarkable recording that the article creator will not accept being changed to a redirect to the perp. TheLongTone (talk) 16:00, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:13, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:13, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted per A7 RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:00, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Solace Law Solicitors[edit]

Solace Law Solicitors (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Solace Law Solicitors" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Both refs here are to trivial mentions: the first is to a page showing that the company is registered, and the second is to a listing with telephone number, address, etc. The article was written by a WP:SPA with no other edit history and probably a undisclosed conflict of interest. KDS4444 (talk) 15:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete (possible CSD A7): A WP:SPA article on a new company, with no more than listing the run-of-the-mill services which it provides. No notability claimed or found. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 17:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 17:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

David Tegfan Davies[edit]

David Tegfan Davies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "David Tegfan Davies" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

I am sure he was a very nice person, but having been a minister for 50 years does not by itself qualify a person as notable. The only reference provided is to a directory/ dictionary (?) entry that reads like it is likely an obituary. A google search for more sources turns up 19 results, most of which mention him as a "long-serving minister of Ammanford's Christian Temple", but say little or nothing more about him. Am not seeing enough here to substantiate a notability claim. KDS4444 (talk) 15:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 20:22, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 20:22, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep: Dictionary entry means he passes WP:ANYBIO, and this 2012 article indicates his enduring historical significance. In any case, WP:GNG is passed right there. Plus there's an OBE thrown in for good measure. StAnselm (talk) 21:05, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:12, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Takuya Uehara[edit]

Takuya Uehara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Takuya Uehara" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

First ref is to a page of stats (blood type, age, etc.) and contains no discussion of the article's subject; 2nd ref is another profile page; 3rd appears to be a legitimate interview, but I am not able to assess the quality of the source (if this is an industry-sponsored interview, then its independence may be in doubt); 4th does not appear to mention the subject anywhere; 5th contains only a trivial mention of the subject as a member of the cast of a theatrical performance; 6th is another cast listing with no discussion; 7th appears to be an announcement about a CD release— the subject's name appears in the headline, but nowhere in the text. The Japanese article is nearly an exact copy of the English one, with the same seven references; the Tagalog article has no content (it's a stub); the Chinese article has no references at all though its content appears to be a duplication of the Japanese article. A Google search turns up Twitter, Instagram, Tumblr, Facebook, and LinkedIn. There may be reliable sources in Japanese, but I am not competent to search for these. The current list of references doesn't look like enough to establish notability, however, and I was not able to identify references that would do the job. KDS4444 (talk) 15:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:11, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:11, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Social Build[edit]

Social Build (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Social Build" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Contested endorsed WP:PROD. The game fails WP:GNG with not enough reliable, independent, in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. I see 1 preview [4] from an RS. Appears to be WP:TOOSOON. The author appears to be WP:SPA. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 15:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 15:25, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - unreleased game. I am not finding significant third-party coverage there; even the one item the nominator points to appears not to be this game, but a different, already-released game that happens to have the words Social and Build next to each other in the URL. --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:29, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete Definitely TOOSOON here, and there's no appropriate redirect target. Agree with above that there is an apparent lack of any serious third-party coverage of the game at this time. --MASEM (t) 15:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Whydezire[edit]

Whydezire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Whydezire" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Delete as per WP:E=N. Downgraded from CSD because it has some views, but does not appear inherently notable as per WP:WEB just yet. In particular, "When evaluating the notability of web content, please consider whether it has had any significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education." Unable to find verifiable secondary sources beyond author's YT account. I enjoy sandwiches (talk) 15:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete Speedy would have been fine as there's no claim of notability made by the article. Article creator is also the person himself judging by the username so it could've been deleted as purely promotional as well. ValarianB (talk) 15:43, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete Personally, I'd have stuck with the A7 but I can definitely respect the nominator's desire/willingness to put it to the wider community. But this is far WP:TOOSOON and is an easy delete. Non-Dropframe talk 17:13, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Libor Milian[edit]

Libor Milian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Libor Milian" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Contested PROD, non-notable singer. — Train2104 (t • c) 14:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Russell Reyes[edit]

Russell Reyes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Russell Reyes" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Proposing to change this to once again redirect to BoybandPH, as it was previously, before it was made into a stand alone article, mostly by a single editor.

Nothing indicates that this artist is specifically notable outside of their group. LynxTufts (talk) 14:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Recommending all existing individual pages of the members of the group for deletion and have them redirected to BoybandPH instead.

Suggesting that individual profiles of the members be edited into their main group page instead. WikiPH (talk) 16:01, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

DXC Technology[edit]

DXC Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "DXC Technology" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Marketing skit. All the detail is information about new company from merger. scope_creep (talk) 13:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC)


Hello, We will contribute more to this article as soon as we can. We have a content plan but cannot publish it until after April 3. Is there another way or section for corporate content? How do companies get their corporate profiles added to Wikipedia without it being considered marketing skit? [1] HJDXC (talk) 13:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)HJDXC[2]

  • Wikipedia is not a free hosting service for corporate content, whose appropriate place is on a corporate website. Regarding future changes to this page, now that it has been created, please do not edit directly but instead suggest changes on the Talk page, as per the conflict of interest guidelines. AllyD (talk) 18:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:CRYSTALBALL. Once this actually happens we can determine how to handle the merging companies' pages - and whether a new page is needed. LynxTufts (talk) 15:07, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 18:29, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Eleni Antoniadou[edit]

Eleni Antoniadou (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Eleni Antoniadou" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

An emerging academic that does not meet the inclusion criteria for academics. John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:52, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 02:38, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 02:38, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment – Below are some sources from a cursory search. North America1000 02:00, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

References

  • Keep per NA1000. There is sufficient indicia of notability. She passes GNG combining academics and political work. Montanabw(talk) 08:39, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relist to cement consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 03:15, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep Why is the nominator trying to delete her article based on secondary academic criteria? If she passes GNG, she is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The above sources show she passes GNG. In addition, she is also a Laureate of the Cartier Women's Initiative Awards for her work in transplants [5]. She is also covered in the Independent and was on the Forbes 30 under 30 list Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:38, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep Sweet kate (talk) 18:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete Ms. Antoniadou is definitely not an accomplished academic as she has no major publications (counted ~ 50 citations through Google scholar, also no scholar profile). She is also not an accomplished enterpreneur. Her company "Transplants Without Donors" is unclear if it ever existed. The only website I could find is this [6], which leads to a dead page here [7]. No news or products of the company exist elsewhere on the web. She also seems to have switched to a political career. The majority of awards gathered by Ms. Antoniadou, which are cited by the wiki article, are related to being a woman start-up enterpreneur, which was evidently short-lived and unimportant. These are not awards about contributions to science or business. Magicheader (talk) 10:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep, primarily for reasons cited by Megalibrarygirl. I do not consider a career change to be relevant to the deletion proposal; if she met GNG in the past for her previous endeavours, she does not lose notability. Agent 86 (talk) 19:24, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 TT me 16:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:19, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep Appears to meet WP:GNG, but it's close. 2601:248:4500:9523:43C:32C0:AC8B:3F10 (talk) 19:50, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete. .The basic principle here is the policy NOT INDISCRIMINATE. The guideline WP:N is an explanation of it, showing the criteria we usually use. It makes no claims to be the criteria we always use. It's the policy that mattes. And even the GNG says that meeting it is a presumption of notability , not proof of it. This is a good example of why that wording matters: The awards are meaningless unless they represent some actual accomplishment. they don't.UsingGNG fort someone who has never actually done anything notable is an absurd misuse of the criterion. Any number of citations about nothing still equals nothing. DGG ( talk ) 20:34, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment. I'm seeing a lot of editorial judgment in this discussion. Who is in charge of deciding which awards "mean something", or are "actual accomplishments" and are therefore notable? Doesn't the fact that an award was granted, and received significant coverage in reliable sources mean more than some editors' judgment that it was somehow unworthy? Isn't that judgment original research rather than an objective measure of notability? Are we to give more importance to an editor's determination of importance rather than objective measures? This discussion is full of WP:IDONTLIKEIT, personal point of view arguments.Jacona (talk) 12:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep While the article is not written in an encyclopedic tone, poor writing is not a reason to delete. Her technology was invented in 2009 and resulted in a successful transplant in 2013. GNG does not require that she be limited to some narrow definition of academic, it requires that she has been covered in RS over time. We don't define whether she is notable. Sources confirm whether she is noted. Forbes 30 under 30, Cartier Laureate, London Technology Awards confirm she meets GNG. [8], [9], [10]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SusunW (talkcontribs) 20:37, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:00, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:00, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment -requesting relist There is more to here than meets the eye and I have sorted it into the medicine lit for editors to have a look. I had a look at the article history and it seems there have been repeated attempts to remove certain information. I am not sure what happened, but it would be interesting to dig deeper. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:01, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
I'm looking into why this removal was made. There is definitely something weird going on. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:44, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
possibly the information was removed because it was a scientifically trivial single case report. Even if the BBC covers a minor accomplishment, it doesn't make it notable. DGG ( talk ) 03:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 12:46, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per WP:A7 by Ritchie333. Non-admin closure Non-Dropframe talk 14:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Nitin Sharma[edit]

Nitin Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Nitin Sharma" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Seemingly non-notable person lovkal (talk) 12:43, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete Not really sure why this was brought to AfD -- this is a clear A7 speedy delete. I've taged it on the page. Non-Dropframe talk 12:48, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

BH Mallorca[edit]

BH Mallorca (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "BH Mallorca" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Unremarkable hotel. Cabayi (talk) 12:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 12:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 12:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Ofer Mizrahi[edit]

Ofer Mizrahi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Ofer Mizrahi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Promotional article not adhering to WP:NPOV. The businesses started by the subject have reached notability (sourced in article), but role of artist himself is not clear and it is hard to assess his notability. Ariadacapo (talk) 12:25, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • keep. Clearly notable after BEFORE, while filtering out other ofer mizrahies (very common Israeli name). He is the main driving force, public face and operator of the companies he founded. Plenty of coverage and some awards. The article itself is indeed poorly written, is an advert, and doesn't even mention clear negatives such as a chapter 11.Icewhiz (talk) 20:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete Should have been speedily deleted as WP:G11. There is nothing in the article that can be kept if the promotional content is removed. Yes, it's a bit odd that the Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection isn't mentioned, but not surprising, since this is an advert. Since when do we refer to people as 'real estate visonary'? Yuck. Mduvekot (talk) 20:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Tito’s[edit]

Tito’s (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Tito’s" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

One current/ongoing club night doesn't seem particularly notable out of all the millions there currently are. The primary reasoning for notability seems to be that the founder got arrested for some major fraud or something, but that doesn't seem to make the club notable by association. Especially as Cursach seems to have LOTS of clubs and things linked to him, so why is this one more notable than others? Mabalu (talk) 12:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete the article's rationale seems more based in the author's obsession with Cursach's arrest than anything significant about the nightclub. If kept the copyvio in the history identified by Bonadea needs to be WP:REVDELed. Cabayi (talk) 12:29, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 12:30, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 12:30, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

KIPS Schools[edit]

KIPS Schools (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "KIPS Schools" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

These pages are not notable as they don't have well-source links. As the creator of the page I vote to delete. GreenCricket (talk) 11:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages:

KIPS Colleges (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
ILM Group of Colleges (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The Knowledge Schools (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The Spirit Schools (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Club Ufone[edit]

Club Ufone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Club Ufone" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This social networking site was never notable. Now it is offline. I suggest to redirect to Ufone. GreenCricket (talk) 11:34, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:04, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:04, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:04, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Iikss[edit]

Iikss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Iikss" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

There is a lack of sources backing up claims set out in the article - it is entirely based on the group's own website. I also have problems with WP:POV and WP:PROMO. Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 09:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Support deletion. We have no evidence so far that this group is notable when it comes to being discussed by reliable sources. Alephb (talk) 17:27, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Prince Yasir[edit]

Prince Yasir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Prince Yasir" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

It seems that for several days the main author has been unable to add any sources to confirm the existence of Prince Yasir and his claim to a Wikipedia article. Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 09:08, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete Subject isn't notable and the single-sentence claim isn't verifiable. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:11, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

John Francis Nash[edit]

John Francis Nash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "John Francis Nash" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

non-notability GetSomeUtah (talk) 08:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

EXMACT[edit]

EXMACT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "EXMACT" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable company. Winged Blades Godric 08:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete The current article is very promotional, and I can't find any independent sources to verify its notability. Fails WP:CORP/WP:PRODUCT. clpo13(talk) 21:27, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Anwar Shahjahan[edit]

Anwar Shahjahan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Anwar Shahjahan" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Subject does not appear to meet our notability guidelines. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:06, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:31, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:31, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:31, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:31, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Inter Alia (Jesse Dangerously album)[edit]

Inter Alia (Jesse Dangerously album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Inter Alia (Jesse Dangerously album)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable, unsourced since 2015 Jennica / talk 07:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

List of current AFL Women's team squads[edit]

List of current AFL Women's team squads (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "List of current AFL Women's team squads" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-encyclopedic content, falling somewhere between WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:DIRECTORY – a real-time simple list of names with no context and no scope to include any context or prose. Content is already included with context on club pages, club season pages, etc., and this article adds nothing. Aspirex (talk) 07:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

David Phillips (entrepreneur)[edit]

David Phillips (entrepreneur) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "David Phillips (entrepreneur)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

An unusual one, but I think this is a case of WP:1E. The man discovered a way to get a good deal and there was coverage of this. But was it lasting or truly significant? Boleyn (talk) 07:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Hired![edit]

Hired! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Hired!" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Article does not list or cite any context or notability outside of subject's appearance on two episodes of Mystery Science Theater 3000. In addition, the only pages that link to the article are: pages related to MST3k, a disambiguation page, two film list pages, an article on the production company's founder (where Hired! is discussed only in its context as an MST3k subject), and a few talk and user pages. A search on Google came up with nothing to fix this issue. Jedzz (talk) 07:08, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:22, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:22, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment: While this topic is mentioned briefly a few times here, mentions outside of that book are very minor. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 21:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Laetitia du Couëdic[edit]

Laetitia du Couëdic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Laetitia du Couëdic" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Individual is non-notable as she has yet to win any major national or international championships as an adult rider. Fails WP:NEQUESTRIAN and is WP:TOOSOON Montanabw(talk) 07:08, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

The Myth of the Rational Voter[edit]

The Myth of the Rational Voter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "The Myth of the Rational Voter" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

A long article, short on genuinely reliable independent sources. Half the sources are the author himself, the balance are generally trivial, or unreliable (e.g. Volokh). The article was substantially expanded by a user who appears to have some relationship with the author, Caplan, and has promoted Caplan extensively in other articles on Wikipedia. This book does not appear to be influential and some of the reviews are - ahem - unflattering. One fo the sources is actually just a comment by someone saying they haven't read it! Guy (Help!) 07:04, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Comment Whether the reviews are flattering or not is absolutely irrelevant. All reviews a book receives count toward its being notable. If a book receives lots of reviews calling it total crap, and no positive reviews at all, then it probably is notable and we should have an article about it, because of the large number of reviews. Things are notable because they get attention in reliable sources, and there is no rule the attention has to be positive (whether the reviews themselves are well-informed or written by people who know what they are talking about is likewise irrelevant). Possible COI issues are also not a reason for deletion. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 07:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep Numerous reviews by mainstream outlets suggest notability.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 12:22, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Microsoft Surface phone[edit]

Microsoft Surface phone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Microsoft Surface phone" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Article is based entirely on speculations and rumours. Looks like a clear case of WP:CRYSTALBALL. Indrek (talk) 06:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete agree too soon. A fan might volunteer to take it into user space until it gets announced and has more reliable press, or at least enough sources to have a notability argument. W Nowicki (talk) 21:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Election results in 2005[edit]

Election results in 2005 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Election results in 2005" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Useless and redundant content forks, there is no relation between any of the events covered in these articles aside from the fact that they were all elections in the given years, already covered at articles for individual elections. We already have List of elections in 2005 etc, so there is no need. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 05:34, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 05:34, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 05:34, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Nominating related pages

Election results in 2009 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Election results in 2004 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

- CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 05:36, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete all Pointless. Number 57 08:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete all These seem incredibly unnecessary. I can't see this article being useful for anyone. PureRED (talk) 15:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Redirect all to the relevant "List of elections in..." articles, as WP:CFORKs at valid search terms. ansh666 19:07, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete all, since if the intention was to create lists (these articles don't identify as lists), then lists already exist, as noted by nom. If the intention was full featured articles, then the combination of unrelated election results doesn't pass WP:GNG. Creating a redirect is useless, since if anyone ever searches for "Election results in 2005" they'll expect to see results - not a list of elections. -- IsaacSt (talk) 20:31, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Glayton Modise[edit]

Glayton Modise (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Glayton Modise" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Attempted to redirect, which kept being reverted with, quite honestly, nonsensical explanations. No indication that this person passes notability criteria. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show he passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 17:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:04, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
It's not well written, but the Glayton article makes reference to Frederick as: "...the father of only son Glayton Modise." Glayton thus appears to be the son. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
You are right -- I found this quote: "Bishop Glayton Modise, who has died in Johannesburg at the age of 76, was the leader of the International Pentecostal Holiness Church, which has 350 branches and more than three million members in Southern Africa.
He inherited the leadership in 1998 from his father, Frederick Modise." "Obituary: Glayton Modise, head of ZCC breakaway church," Chris Barron, 2016-02-21 This may prove useful in sorting out this mess.96.59.183.125 (talk) 01:08, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
My apologies for missing that in this article. I was looking at the father's article, which was unclear, but I fixed it here.96.59.183.125 (talk) 01:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Redirect or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 05:01, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep -- As the leader of 350 churches, Glayton was in a position similar to that of the bishop or archbishop in a major denomination. Accordingly, he is certainly notable. The current article is hardly more than a stub, but that is not grounds for deletion. Are there any newspaper obituaries? Peterkingiron (talk) 11:21, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • I think that I posted his obit earlier, right here. Was that what you were looking for, & somehow overlooked? (It's all good : we all overlook stuff, since we're only human.)
Yes, the Obituary in the South Africa Sunday Times is liked above. Having read it, I am all the more convinced that this is a keep. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
OK, very good. While you weighed in on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Erika_Grey, another article on the chopping block, I notice you didn't vote. Since your last comment there, much discussion, especially pro, but also con, has ensued & developed. Do you think you could take another look and weigh in some more? It's been relisted. Moreover, the article is more solid since some recent edits to Erika Grey. Thanks.96.59.129.57 (talk) 18:59, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep -- As per Peterkingiron (talk) who mentions his oversight, but I'd add, the fact his father is notable is a very strong argument for keeping. (Not that having a 'notable' father, alone, is sufficient, but it helps.96.59.169.231 (talk) 14:02, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment I add that I just looked at article: "a total membership of over three million." VERY notable, even if for no other reason.96.59.169.231 (talk) 14:08, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep added a few of the major South African papers that covered him. A number of articles during this tenure, teh church was a big deal and campaigning politicians used to stop by, producing article that describe the Church's scale and buildings. When he died, there was a battle over who would run the church; involving a son, Modise's two rival wives, and thousands of people mobbing courts where some aspect of teh church's afairs were being settled. Also a good deal of violence. It would be nice if someone felt equal to the challenge of producing a good article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:37, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 05:27, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

WER v REW[edit]

WER v REW (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "WER v REW" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Insignificant legal case for non-notable person. Only sources are Popbitch (a primary source as original party to the super injunction) and Society of Editors - a niche website of specialised interest. Article is unlikely to ever pass GNG. Only in death does duty end (talk) 18:17, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related page for approx the same reason. Not going to pass GNG, insignificant legal case of non-notable subject:
Hutcheson v News Group Newspapers Ltd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:39, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:39, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:40, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:40, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Merge per O Fortuna. Please also note O Fortuna's other recent edits to the article. (addition 12:16, 11 March 2017 (UTC))Delete. I did leave a note on the talk pages of a bunch of articles like this to notify the creator/maintainer of those article, DanielJCooper that many are likely to end up here. I also posted a note at WikiProject Law to see if anyone there thinks these articles need to be saved. --David Tornheim (talk) 18:46, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete I was shocked that anyone would think something this far under the public-consciousness radar would warrant an article to begin with. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 19:25, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete. There's no need to list every law case in the UK, especially ones where there will never be enough detail to bring it beyond a totally uninformative stub. If the person concerned was notable, and mentioning the case would pass BLP concerns, it could perhaps merit a brief reference on their page - but they're not of course. Alternatively, it could be referred to in the broader page about superinjunctions or privacy injunctions - which it already is. So this can go. N-HH talk/edits 12:08, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is a no-brainer of there ever was one. Do I feel snow in the air? Softlavender (talk) 08:58, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Merge Hutcheson v News Group Newspapers Ltd into WER v REW. The case had significant implications in English case-law and has been discussed regularly, in reliable sources, since; but they are effectively the same case, so no need for two distinct articles. — O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 11:38, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: Thank you for commenting and explaining! I will change my !vote. I hope you respond to my post at WikiProject Law about the other similar "Super Injuctions" that have equally weak RS at this time. Daniel said they are stubs, so maybe there is RS for them also. --David Tornheim (talk) 12:12, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, but what are the "significant implications" for English case law? They may well exist, but I'm not aware of any, and there's nothing in this comment or the article in question to explain what they are. The only reason AFAIK that the case was discussed at all in the media was because there was a vague link to an actual notable person, which led to a bit of tabloid interest. I'm still not clear that either page is needed or justified. N-HH talk/edits 12:25, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
ps: OK, I see that page was expanded since I last looked. Please see comments here on that (placed there as probably too detailed for this AfD page). N-HH talk/edits 12:45, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merge or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 05:00, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • In relation to above: as far as legal decisions go it really was not significant. It set no new precedent, just being an interpretation of existing law. It wasnt relevant in the wider issue of super-injunctions (cases such as the Trafig toxic dumping etc having the real meat in the area), and arguably it would not have raised a blip if it wasnt for the relationship to a much more famous non-party. A person with no celebrity connection wouldnt have made the press except as a passing mention in a law review. The key quote is the final one from the Guardian: "a further setback to the power of privacy orders to restrict reporting". Emphasis mine, this was just another in a line of super-injunction related cases at the time. Only in death does duty end (talk) 15:01, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • It now passes the WP:GNG, having been covered in multiple, third party, reliable, independent sources, with both depth and persistence of coverage. The issues raised in the nomination have been addressed, in so far that the notability of.one of the parties is less than the other, and the sourcing has been improved. About 500%, in numbers :) ...Whiiiich the article did not when it was nominated. — O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 16:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Merge. Notabilty (now established) for its superinjunction status rather than notability of parties. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:59, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 05:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Carl Benjamin[edit]

Carl Benjamin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Carl Benjamin" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Previously deleted in 2016. Its sources are all passing mentions of Benjamin's online role as an Internet troll and minor role in Gamergate. Only source with some semblance of depth is this article in The Sunday Times, which covers a "trolling campaign" of his. At best, this is BLP1E, and at worst, this is a minor figure with no significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?) (By the way, the easiest way to tell that Heat Street is unreliable is to find this page when looking for its editorial credentials. Reliability is about editorial pedigree and reputation for fact-checking.) czar 01:40, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

  • I'm confused by your claim that the Heat Street contact us page shows evidence that this is an unreliable source. Can you explain further? (full disclosure: I am an occasional Heat Street contributor.) Mark Schierbecker (talk) 01:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • The editor I usually work under is The Washington Post's former video director, btw. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 01:57, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • I linked the absence of an editorial policy, the absence of a reputation for reliability and fact-checking, and I only mentioned it as acknowledgement of the biography's talk page discussion. If you want to discuss further, the best venue for your question is Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard, where, for instance, a current thread addresses Heat Street by name. czar 08:30, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • It isn't common practice for online-only publications to list their editorial policy on the mast head. Not publishing an editorial policy is not the same as not having one. Still don't get how this is relevant. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 09:27, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
@Mark Schierbecker It is mainly relevant because if Heat Street had a written editorial policy, it would likely be considered a reliable source (rather than a marginal one). If Heat Street could be considered a reliable source in this article then the notability of this subject wouldn't be in question. InsertCleverPhraseHere 19:20, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep - Benjamin meets Wikipedia's notability policy for entertainers by a good margin. His videos have 136 million views (plus another 12 million on this channel). The sources don't just show popularity, but that Sargon is a global political force. A Los Angeles Times reporter calls him a "provocative cultural commentator." BuzzFeed calls Benjamin and Paul Joseph Watson "prolific political-correctness watchdogs." Heat Street calls him a "resoundingly popular anti-PC YouTuber". Another source not mentioned in the article, and also surely not a passing mention: Sargon on The Rubin Report. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 02:31, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
    • It says on your user page that you're a reporter for Heat Street. Isn't that a conflict issue if you're using sources of a publication you're part of for an article you made? GamerPro64 04:31, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
      • I acknowledged my affiliation above. No, it really isn't a conflict to vouch for the verifiability of your own outlet. You can even cite yourself "within reason" per Wikipedia policy. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 05:17, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
        • If you are looking for conflicts you may want to focus on my interview with Sargon last year. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 05:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
          • Didn't notice the disclosure at the top. Also, looking through Google News there is an article about Sargon's game from Siliconera that can be useful. Also saw a piece about him on Gizmodo recently but am not sure its appropriate for the article. GamerPro64 05:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete as a non-notable person. Youtube views & videos are not sufficient for establishing notability if he has not achieved consistent, significant coverage in independent reliable sources, and I don't see much having changed with the article from when it was first deleted. PeterTheFourth (talk) 07:45, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep Even if we use the most rigid definition of WP:RS, then this person is covered by TeleSUR,[3] the Los Angeles Times and the Sunday Times. I've seen worse coverage in failed AfDs. Maybe we should reinsert the TeleSUR-part to show that mr. Benjamin/Akkad got significant non-trivial coverage.Jeff5102 (talk) 09:53, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  1. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accenture
  2. ^ http://www.zdnet.com/article/dxc-technology-to-emerge-from-csc-and-hpe-enterprise-services-merger/
  3. ^ Gentlemen, It's Time We Had a Serious Talk; by Rich Penney; 1 June 2016;Telesur
Being mentioned by name once in an article, especially for the same event, is not significant coverage. Don't see how you can write a biography with solely passing mentions, the LA Times opinion piece, and the Sunday Times mentioned in the nom czar 16:39, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
I would say the coverage is sufficient to make an article of it. But that is my opinion. I wonder what the administrators think of it.Jeff5102 (talk) 21:54, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep There are plenty of sources here to demonstrate notability. It might be marginal but its there; how about this article in Vice that has some significant coverage [11]? 2016 might have been too soon, but it doesn't seem like it is too soon any more. InsertCleverPhraseHere 10:53, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Linked that specific article in the nom as a passing mention czar 16:39, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
I'd consider it more than a passing mention IMO. The article isn't just about him, true, but mentions him 6 times in total and of those discussed in the article, he gets the most coverage. Again, as I said, it is marginal, but it is there. InsertCleverPhraseHere 18:24, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Moreover, I don't see the point in deleting articles like these (marginally notable bios where a fanbase really, really, wants an article). If we don't have an article there will be constant creations of poor quality submissions that will either end up at AfD or if the page is create-protected will end up wasting loads of time over at AfC. Also you can end up in a situation like over at Paul Joseph Watson where the page was deleted numerous times, create protected, and then even after the subject did get significant coverage, the article languished as a draft because of creation protection. Better to have a short stub on the topic that is decently written and can be improved. InsertCleverPhraseHere 19:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
The WP policy is to delete articles on topics that haven't received significant coverage. All fans can do in that model is lobby for more coverage. This is an encyclopedia, not a catalog of sensational headlines. czar 01:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
I said 'marginally notable' not non-notable. To be clear I believe there is significant coverage here, but it is not overwhelmingly obvious. InsertCleverPhraseHere 03:04, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete -- coverage are passing mentions or otherwise not suitable for meeting SIGCOV. Wikipedia is not a collection of fan pages. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:22, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment; What about these episodes on The Rubin Report where Carl has been interviewed at depth multiple times by Dave Rubin? episode 21 and episode 58. These seem to easily satisfy the reliability criteria on their own as in-depth coverage of the topic. InsertCleverPhraseHere 19:30, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Note I have added these sources to the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 20:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Interviews are not independent of the subject, and are not sufficient for establishing notability, per WP:BASIC. Grayfell (talk) 03:30, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
That's actually a fair point. InsertCleverPhraseHere 04:24, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep Quite a well known person: [12](Gizmodo) [13] (Huffington Post) [14] (Breitbart). These sources havn't been mentioned yet, and all mention the subject in decent detail. I think he passes WP:GNG. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 17:48, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete: Unlike fellow Youtuber Paul Joseph Watson, who has received significant coverage for the Sweden/Tim Pool offer, Sargon doesn't seem to be notable yet, even though he has a dedicated fanbase that is growing. But fanbase or number of followers don't establish notability, and most of the coverage in RS are indeed passing mentions, with only some blog entries discussing him in more detail. And per Grayfell, an interview in The Rubin Report doesn't establish notability. κατάσταση 18:52, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Have a look at [[15]} this source from the huffington post AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 07:41, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Have a look at [[16]} this source from the huffington post AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 07:41, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Already used as a source with "The Good Men Project". GamerPro64 05:39, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom. --NoGhost (talk) 10:44, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment - What is up with all the votes from newish contributors? Mark Schierbecker (talk) 14:20, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Politically charged or contentious AfDs are just like that, they tend to pull a bunch of people out of the woodwork (both for and against). The argument for deletion of this article really depends on how you define 'passing mentions' (is an article that is 1/3 about the subject a 'passing mention'?--IMO it is not). To say that this subject is not notable also requires completely dismissing Heat Street coverage. InsertCleverPhraseHere 18:32, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment about 'Heat Street'. People who are voting delete seem to be dismissing Heat Street as an unreliable source, despite a body of evidence that indicates that Heat Street issues retractions [17] (issuing retractions is a sign of a reliable source). 2: that they are taken seriously as a journalistic source by the white house and other news outlets: [18], [19], [20], [21]. as well as being taken seriously as a journalistic source by Factcheck.org [22].
Heatstreet alone has enough coverage of Benjamin to easily establish GNG [23], [24]. and there seems to be a body of evidence to establish that Heatstreet has a reputation as a reliable source among other reliable sources. InsertCleverPhraseHere 18:42, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep Sargon of Akkad has been covered by sources other than Heat Street such as The Los Angeles Times and Daily Dot (which are already included in the article). Sargon also had a passing mention in Crave Online where he interviewed wth Jontron. Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚 04:26, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep - I honestly don't believe there's any real reason to delete the article. Even if the articles are in passing of Sargon, there's still information about him that can be used. Granted it'll end up as a weak article but still shows notability about the YouTuber. GamerPro64 05:39, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep. There is enough coverage of the subject that is between passing mentions and substantial coverage, including ones that put him as one of the most prominent members of the right-wing Youtuber movement, that WP:BASIC is met. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 18:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep - He gets enough views on his youtube videos to merit a celebrated status. netcowboy 04:26, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Note that netcowboy has made very few edits and this is his first edit since 2008. InsertCleverPhraseHere 07:41, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep - He is a notable and influential youtuber who has been referenced by multiple media sources and politicians.Andres rojas22 (talk) 17:30, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
@Andres rojas22: Sorry- which politicians have referenced him? PeterTheFourth (talk) 03:17, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Jess Phillips (politician)Andres rojas22 (talk) 13:00, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
@Andres rojas22: When and where? Would you be able to provide proof? Which additional politician(s) do you suppose referenced him (given that you used the plural form)? PeterTheFourth (talk) 19:43, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
I believe that this is what Andres rojas22 is referring to. however, Jess Philips does not mention him by name in the article, but does refer to his actions, and the tweets she received from others as a result of his comment "I wouldn't even rape you." This particular article by Phillips doesn't contribute to Benjamin's notability (though the coverage of the same incident in the Sunday Times does). InsertCleverPhraseHere 00:54, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment - Benjamin himself talked about this article in this video. Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚 03:21, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete – It is too soon for an article that would cover Benjamin encyclopedically. I am not convinced that the depth of coverage is substantial enough for a BLP, given that it consists almost exclusively of short opinion pieces and trivial mentions. Most of these are already included in the article itself or are discussed above, and I found no other substantial coverage after a thorough search. The opinion pieces (like the articles in the Los Angeles Times, telesur, and the Huffington Post, which is republished at the Good Men Project) comprise the most substantial portion of this article's sourcing, and while they are useful additions to an article in representing the spectrum of opinion, they are rarely reliable for statements of fact. I am extremely skeptical of counting Heat Street as an RS–it does not make any attempt to distinguish its mostly satirical opinion commentary (e.g. "American Values Under Attack: Link Is Transgender for 10 Minutes in New ‘Zelda’ Game", "Why Tracer Being Gay Is Offensive to Otherkin Like Me") from actual journalism. User:Insertcleverphrasehere proposed that it is taken seriously as a journalistic source by several outlets, but this seems to be largely a misrepresentation of their positions: the articles all indicate the media "takes Heat Street seriously" in the sense that they were important to the administration's wiretapping story, but they do not characterize its work as serious journalism; even the most avid followers of Mensch's reporting described in the articles, like Spayd, couch their praise with "I have no idea whether it's true or not". This indicates, if anything, a poor reputation; as mentioned by Czar before, the lack of a written editorial policy only furthers this. Other available sourcing is far too trivial (see one-sentence mention in Salon, the one-sentence scattered, brief, mentions on Buzzfeed News, a few short sentences in The Daily Dot, a tangential mention in VICE which devotes a short paragraph to the Jess Phillips incident and little more, etc.) The most substantial piece of journalism, this Times article, is much better contextualized in the Jess Phillips article. —0xF8E8 (talk) 04:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 05:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment I have inserted this from Inside Higher Ed, which is not enough for a Wikipedia-article in itself, but combined with all other references, I think it contributes to establish the notability of mr. Benjamin.Jeff5102 (talk) 09:21, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Mohiuddin Ahmed[edit]

Mohiuddin Ahmed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Mohiuddin Ahmed" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The sources cited are his obituary, a similar short piece on an anniversary of his death, and a couple duplicative passing mentions. There is also a book, but no indication that it covers him. It is used only to support the name change of a student group.

From these sources we learn that he was acting president of a student political group. On its own, that is not enough to pass WP:POLITICIAN. We also learn that he was arrested for actively participating in the 1952 Language Movement, took part in the 1962 education movement, and fought for Bangladesh's independence during the Liberation War of 1971. Participating in those events would not be unusual for someone of his age at the time. There is very little detail about the form of his participation, other than that in one case he was at the forefront of a procession.

Mohiuddin Ahmed is a common name, which complicates searches. Several were active in the 1960s and 1970s, among them politicians, diplomats, military officers, and others, but I found nothing to connect them to this student leader. The article asserts that he joined the National Awami Party (NAP), but cites no source. If a source could be produced to show that this Mohiuddin Ahmed was important in a registered political party, I might be persuaded to change my recommendation.

I'm sympathetic to the fact that the peak of his career was in the pre-internet age, but there are enough newspaper databases and books online that I could find information about other Mohiuddin Ahmeds of the period, and about people who were definitely leading figures, but nothing about him until after his death, and nothing more than what the article cites. Searching by his "popularly known as" Bengali name returned no reliable sources. Does not meet WP:BASIC. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:00, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 05:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 05:03, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 05:03, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Flag of the Republic of Serbian Krajina[edit]

Flag of the Republic of Serbian Krajina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Flag of the Republic of Serbian Krajina" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The page contains information redundant from Republic of Serbian Krajina and Flag of Serbs of Croatia. May be merged with one of the articles or deleted. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:13, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Yugoslavia-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:13, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete. Cannot see anything relevant that is not already in the linked articles. --T*U (talk) 08:39, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Merge / Redirect to Republic of Serbian Krajina There is minimal content here, but whatever does exist should be merged and redirected to the parent article. Alansohn (talk) 17:59, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:43, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Westfield Airport West[edit]

Westfield Airport West (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Westfield Airport West" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

fails WP:GNG. gnews reveals run of the mill coverage. the centre is relatively small sized for an Australian centre. 2 of the 3 sources in the article are primary. those arguing for keep should not use the weak argument or how about other Westfields?. LibStar (talk) 01:49, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Airport West, Victoria § Commerce per WP:ATD-R. After a few brief searches, not finding enough coverage to qualify a standalone article. However, this is a valid search term, and the redirect target already has some content about this shopping centre. North America1000 01:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete per LibStar. Non notable mall, and being a Westfield mall does not assume notability. Ajf773 (talk) 08:36, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Redirect as per User:Northamerica1000. Nothing but the usual run of the mill commercial pages coverage, and not so much detail it can't be adequately covered in the locality article. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:50, 13 March 2017 (UTC).
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:43, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Marly Sarney[edit]

Marly Sarney (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Marly Sarney" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

AfDing this as WP:NOTINHERITED since I have a feeling a speedy will be contested. TheLongTone (talk) 14:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:39, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:57, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep The spouse of a nation's executive are usually kept. In addition, the Portuguese Wikipedia entry is much more complete and includes numerous references. --Enos733 (talk) 20:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Cop and a Half-wit[edit]

Cop and a Half-wit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Cop and a Half-wit" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Could be a redirect to the series, but no indication of stand-alone notability regarding this particular episode. Was a redirect, which was reversed, but almost solely consists of a plot summary. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 02:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Keep. Yes, the article needs work, but there is a Wikipedia article for every episode of the series. There's no need to delete this page when 1) the article can be improved and 2) a redirect would be the most appropriate course of action IF a standalone article were deemed inappropriate. ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:56, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep - Let this page stay. I am agreeing with Another Believer on this one. --Rtkat3 (talk) 00:54, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep The parent structure Category:Family Guy episodes includes 300-odd articles. This is an episode that aired two days ago and every reason exists to assume that this article will be expanded and sourced to match the hundreds of other such episode articles. Alansohn (talk) 18:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete. I don't see why we have to have an article for every single episode of a show. The articles for this and the previous season lack a significant amount of independent reviews/coverage and are basically just plot summaries with one or two reviews mentioned. If enough meaningful content can be added like Road to the North Pole, it can be re-created.--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 22:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Family Guy (season 15)#Episodes. Most every one of these episode articles have only plots. This isn't a case of "wait and see" for expansion. Articles should be researched before creation, especially episode articles which have become plot dumps of late. — Wyliepedia 16:08, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Family Guy (season 15)#Episodes per CAWylie, or delete. Individual episodes are subject to the same notability guidelines that everything else is. There is no reason for us to have hundreds of articles on each individual episode of Family Guy, unless there has been significant critical or media coverage of an episode for some reason. ♠PMC(talk) 20:52, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Redirect per Wyliepedia. We need to start looking at FG articles much more closely as the show gets older and new episode articles have now now declined into 'type what I see' plotline reviews that the most rudimentary recap site would reject, a cite to the plot from Fox PR, followed by an episode grade from some random site (usually IGN, a gaming site, and even that's now getting the dreaded 'expand section' tag for newer episodes, meaning we're it for a synopsis on the web outside of fansites, which should not be where we are). Nate (chatter) 14:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Redirect per above. It is a plot-only episode summary. There is nothing that shows this specific episode has any independent notability, as the only sources are generally just plot synopsis that do not go into any non-plot discussion. The fact that there are articles are other FG articles is meaningless if this particular one does not meet the notability standards. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 16:27, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment: Are folks actually searching for sources before commenting on the lack of sources? We should not merge/delete this article if has potential to grow, just because the article is currently incomplete. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:22, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
    • I can't answer for anybody else, but I did, and, as I said, could find nothing but plot synopsis. I have yet to find any reviews on the episode from any notable sources, nor any information saying anything meaningful about the development of this particular episode. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 17:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Comment I did (and have for most of these articles that have come to AfD); We've got under 60 G-hits under the episode title + review; without the 'review' appendage we have this article as #3, then Family Guy wiki and its IMDb entry, then TV.com before we decline to 'buy this episode', 'watch on Fox or Hulu.com' or 'stream this episode illegally and obliterate your PC through spyware' links. There is no there there; it's an average episode of an animated sitcom. The reason this lethargy still exists is that in the past multiple TV sites were hiring people to recap anything with a 22-minute plot on a screen so sources are plentiful, but since 2015 when AV Club decided to cull down to high-hit reviews and other sites did the same, these episodes somehow still get articles because of the past, even though it's just IGN and some site called 'BubbleBlabbers' reviewing it at this point in just 'acknowledge and move on' style. Enough is enough; this isn't going to grow, become a classic episode or be mentioned again beyond season reviews. This isn't the Wikipedia of 2007 and its time to be more judicious about what shows deserve episode articles or not at this point. Nate (chatter) 19:00, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Redirect per above. I like Family Guy, but see no reason why every episode should have an article, especially if they are simply going to be all plot as most of the current season 15 episode articles are. Dunarc (talk) 19:11, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:11, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Ronald Jones II[edit]

Ronald Jones II (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Ronald Jones II" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Unprodded without rationale. Fails WP:NCOLLATH, and doesn't meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 02:20, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:08, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:08, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:08, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:08, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Subodh Markandeya[edit]

Subodh Markandeya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Subodh Markandeya" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non Notable run of the mill advocate Uncletomwood (talk) 18:43, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Keep There's a lot of puffery and irrelevancies which are enough to obscure actual claims to notability. This includes involvement in some major human rights cases before the Supreme Court of India, backed up by references in WP:RS. That seems notable under the WP:GNG and likewise fits under Bearian's Attorney notability essay.Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:47, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep but trim down. Thanks for the note, Eggishorn. Bearian (talk) 22:57, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
I should be the one thanking you for that essay. It is a valuable resource. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:00, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Welcome. I trimmed it some. Bearian (talk) 23:08, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 05:00, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:05, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:05, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:05, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

The DailyER[edit]

The DailyER (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "The DailyER" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Usually college media needs years to work up notability. This one is nine years old and almost all the references are passing mentions. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 04:34, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Advanced Security Group[edit]

Advanced Security Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Advanced Security Group" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No significant independent sources. Most (all ?) are own web-site and press releases. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH  Velella  Velella Talk   10:59, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Comment - this is listed twice - here and 2 steps down... Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:11, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:34, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Philippine School Sultanate of Oman[edit]

Philippine School Sultanate of Oman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Philippine School Sultanate of Oman" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Was deprodded without rationale or improvement. Wholly uncited original research. A bit of the promotional material was deleted back in November, but then more was added after that. Way too much commentary and NPOV material. Onel5969 TT me 11:31, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:33, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete and start over. This might be notable (and perhaps unique) as a Filipino school in Oman, but the article needs to state its sources. That's a lot of text with not a single citation. I think it's up to JCGDIMAIWAT (and anyone who wants to help) to find references, otherwise it must be deleted by WP policy WP:OR. My delete vote is because it's been over a week with no progress on WP:V. Jack N. Stock (talk) 04:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Jack N. Stock (talk) 05:05, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Alangar Jayagovind[edit]

Alangar Jayagovind (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Alangar Jayagovind" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non Notable Uncletomwood (talk) 18:45, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:36, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:36, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:36, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete, as failing WP:V. Every single ref given in the article is a dead link, and these references are only given as footnotes for the last two sentences in the article, dealing with his visiting positions and his 26 publications. Nothing in GoogleScholar, and almost nothing even for a plain google search[25]. For the latter, only 376 results, and almost all of those are to Wikipedia mirrors. Nsk92 (talk) 21:04, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 12:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete references do not add to pasing GNG, and his postions and background do not add to passing any notability criteria for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:05, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. As former vice chancellor of NLSIU [26] (that is, its actual head, not its ceremonial head) he may pass WP:PROF#C6. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:02, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
  • keep a vice chancellor is in effect the CEO of the university and meets WP:PROF. LibStar (talk) 01:03, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:30, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Titanic Sinclair[edit]

Titanic Sinclair (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Titanic Sinclair" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

WP:NPF definitely seems to apply here. Benmite (talk) 02:51, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

--Relisting. Benmite (talk) 21:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Titanic is a relatively notable director and musician, and is a major part of the That Poppy project which has gained serious traction in both the online niche AND the mainstream media lately. Cue her collaborations with Comedy Central and with iHeartRadio, all due to Titanic Sinclair. Imesko (talk) 22:54, 6 March 2017
Yes, he is a large contributor to the That Poppy project, but at the end of the day he is not nearly as notable or as well-known as Poppy herself. Also, I have not been able to find much about Poppy or Sinclair in the "mainstream media". Regardless of who managed to assist Poppy in collaborating with Comedy Central and iHeartRadio, he is not the one who appeared in the collaborations with them, Poppy is. I understand your point but would argue that to most, Sinclair is mostly a background figure who drives the project as opposed to someone who is at the forefront of it. As a musician, his band Mars Argo's work did not receive very much attention until his work with Poppy began to garner attention, and his work as a director has been minimal, to say the least. Benmite (talk) 21:23, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete – Would have to agree with Benmite; Sinclair isn't a public figure and more of a back stage person for That Poppy. Although mentioned in some sources, he isn't the main subject about them and merely mentioned only. Most sources on this article point to social media (not reliable) or items relating to both Mars Argo and himself. The article has also seem to make random assumptions, such as the arrest section or what Sinclair had commented himself here on Twitter about the page (although it might be light to say that much information about himself isn't in the public domain) as pointed out by user Hay232. Adog104 Talk to me 19:56, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 TT me 16:45, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:25, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Brand X Music[edit]

Brand X Music (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Brand X Music" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Primary sourced advert for non notable company. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 TT me 16:49, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:25, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Little Fictions Tour[edit]

Little Fictions Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Little Fictions Tour" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

fails WP:EVENT and WP:GNG. Search results are stuffs related only about the album Little FictionsOluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 17:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 17:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

XTRMST[edit]

XTRMST (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "XTRMST" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable per notability guidelines for music. - TheMagnificentist 05:07, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 TT me 17:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

References

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Fatstone.tv[edit]

Fatstone.tv (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Fatstone.tv" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:GNG RoCo(talk) 19:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 21:01, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:23, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Doug Geed[edit]

Doug Geed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Doug Geed" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

vanity page, no independent sources Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Casa Cuba[edit]

Casa Cuba (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Casa Cuba" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

fails WP:GNG. gnews refers to "Casa cuba" in a different context not this gallery. LibStar (talk) 03:16, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Selangor Bio Bay[edit]

Selangor Bio Bay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Selangor Bio Bay" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non notable "hi-tech area" fails WP:NGEOG because its not a natural place (like a pond or creek) or a road. If it is an actual structure, those have to pass GNG (at the least), and this doesn't. There are 4 or 5 news sources, but WIKIISNOT a list of every corporate structure ever. L3X1 (distant write) 02:00, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • The nominator is mistaken. The guideline here is WP:GEOLAND, which covers populated places. In this case, it would seem to be a district, and so I believe GNG would apply. Gnews does reveal some articles. Searching for the Malaysian name might yield more. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Ella Mai[edit]

Ella Mai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Ella Mai" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

A7 was rejected, unnamable unnotable musician, MUSICBIO L3X1 (distant write) 01:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Keep I don't believe that a musician being unnamable is an acceptable reason for a deletion nomination (honestly, unless this was a typing mistake, I would tend to consider such a reasoning quite prejudiced). Ella is quite famous actually, and qualifies on MUSICBIO. Called a "UK sensation" by Billboard,[27] and the "new queen of the breakup album",[28], Mai has released multiple EPs[29] and has appeared repeatedly on Billboard top charts: #20 on Billboard R&B Albums,[30] #8 on Billboard Heatseekser charts,[31] #38 on Billboard top R&B/Hip Hop albums,[32] and others. Here's her Billboard biography,[33] and some other significant coverages:[34][35][36][37]. Lourdes 03:05, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
It was a typo, thanks for pointing it out, Lourdes. L3X1 (distant write) 13:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Lucas Adams[edit]

Lucas Adams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Lucas Adams" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Actor's entire article is built around one casting on Days of Our Lives, and likely built from an IMDb profile. Hardly a notable BLP. livelikemusic talk! 01:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Keep. I think this article shouldn't be deleted no matter what other people say. This article has enough citations needed, and the citations support the article, about the number of tv shows and movies the actor has starred in. It is very annoying when some annoying editors think it's more than okay for the article to be deleted. So I'm against it. --Princessruby (talk) 18:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Sara Delamont[edit]

Sara Delamont (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Sara Delamont" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This article lacks enough independent, reliable sources to establish notability. Two sources were written by the subject, and the other four are from her university, including her vita and a page of her specialties, which she wrote. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:35, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep. Fellow AcSS [38] passes WP:PROF#C3 and big citations on Google scholar (32 publications with >100 citations each and h-index 53) also give her a pass of WP:PROF#C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep as clearly above. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:08, 21 March 2017 (UTC).
  • Keep well-cited researcher. The article can be improved, but AfD isn't the way to go about that. — Stringy Acid (talk) 16:22, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Snow Keep enormous citation record is conclusive. Agricola44 (talk) 16:27, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Angus Gunn[edit]

Angus Gunn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Angus Gunn" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Speedy deletion per WP:G4 was contested on the grounds that he played in a pre-season friendly tournament, which is insufficient to meet WP:NSPORT. The article still fails WP:GNG as well. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:30, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:30, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - no change in the notability issues that resulted in deletion during the first AfD. Player does not meet WP:NFOOTBALL or WP:GNG. Kosack (talk) 19:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Southside Wrestling Entertainment[edit]

Southside Wrestling Entertainment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Southside Wrestling Entertainment" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Nikki311 01:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they are dependent on the above article:

SWE Heavyweight Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
SWE Speed King Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
SWE Tag Team Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Queen of Southside Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nikki311 01:29, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

James Sheppard (politician)[edit]

James Sheppard (politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "James Sheppard (politician)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The "About James Sheppard" link returned an error message when I tried it on March 20, 2017. However, it appears to be a publication of the subject's campaign, which would make it not a reliable source by Wikipedia standards. More sources are needed to establish notabiltiy. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello there. I can find unbiased news sources that back up this information, and will delete the "About James Sheppard" link promptly when more reliable sources are added. User:WuTang94 (talk) 01:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Found another reference and added to article (Rochester Business Journal) Cllgbksr (talk) 05:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

City rivalry in Finland[edit]

City rivalry in Finland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "City rivalry in Finland" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Cities have rivalries, of course. However, this article seems to be all WP:OR and is completely unsourced. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:50, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 01:06, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lepricavark (talk) 01:06, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete: Not a hoax, but it is an essay with original research. Fails GNG. Ceosad (talk) 19:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Beaufort Broncos[edit]

Beaufort Broncos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Beaufort Broncos" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No evidence of notability. May not exist. Rathfelder (talk) 22:56, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 01:04, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 01:04, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lepricavark (talk) 01:04, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - for the record, they do exist, but are clearly not notable. ansh666 19:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Up North (Comedy TV Series)[edit]

Up North (Comedy TV Series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Up North (Comedy TV Series)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Delete. Minimally sourced article about a television series which airs only on a single local IPTV website in a single city. There's no evidence being shown of the wider distribution needed to clear WP:NMEDIA, and no indication of reliable source coverage to get it past WP:GNG -- the only reference being cited here is the sales page of a DVD on Amazon. There's simply nothing here to deem it notable enough for an article. Bearcat (talk) 05:39, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Firstly I would like an explanation as to why the page has disappeared whilst it quite clearly states that there is a discussion as to whether this page will be deleted, It also states that I can still edit the page (and by edit I mean add further references(that I have not had time to add since I work and illness has required my attention of late...)) by the way, are you privy to the distribution details of the company that show the series? If so I would love to see evidence of that, from what I hear the show has been watched by and has tweets that mention the show as far away as Korea. Little bit out of the way considering the IPTV station as you say is local to Essex... Furthermore links with two actors who have pages on Wikipedia as well would to me suggest it is of interest to people who follow those pages. (ps. sorry if I seem a little ott with my rant here but I suffer from depression and not having a good time of late and this doesn't help particulary since I spent so much time setting the article up only to have you tear it down on a whim against it seems the rules stating that it was under discussion and I would still be able to edit it? Would love an explanation as to why I can't access the page anymore. (Ps. also why is there a page for Essex tv if its a local IPTV station? surely that contravenes the rules that you are mentioning earlier on in this talk?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.138.201.43 (talk) 10:13, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Apologies I was able to edit the article I misunderstood how to get to it but the links to the page from relevant other articles have been removed that's what initially annoyed me about not being able to edit it. I will add more references to the show. I am still wondering why there is scrutiny over my article being about a show on a local iptv network though and yet an article exists for the channel itself, that seems to contradict itself? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.138.201.43 (talk) 10:19, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:44, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:44, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:46, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC(talk) 01:03, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Joseph Pippen[edit]

Joseph Pippen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Joseph Pippen" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

self-published, no independent coverage Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:29, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC(talk) 01:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Kristin Fairlie[edit]

Kristin Fairlie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Kristin Fairlie" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

BLP unsourced since 2008 (almost 9 years ago). Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:23, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:25, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:25, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:25, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:25, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:25, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Naples United FC[edit]

Naples United FC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Naples United FC" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Unpromising google search. Article is about small soccer team that hasn't played yet, TOOSOON, CRSYTAL, WP:FOOTYN L3X1 (distant write) 00:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

I'm pinging some people from the football projects because of their experience, not SHOPPING nor Meat puppetry. I don't know how they will vote, or what they will say. I may have experience with them before, but I have not attempted to influence their vote in anyway. GiantSnowman Kosack Jellyman FilthyDon Peter_James Number_57 BoroFan89 Jkudlick L3X1 (distant write) 00:31, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 00:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 00:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 00:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep given that the team is scheduled to begin play in only a little over a month, I don't think a TOOSOON/CRYSTALBALL deletion is a good idea. Furthermore, almost every team in that league has an article, and I don't think this should be an exception. Lepricavark (talk) 00:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG - hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. Hack (talk) 02:49, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - as the club hasn't played a match, it falls short of WP:FOOTYN and the expectation of it playing, even in the near future, is WP:CRYSTAL. There seems to be surprisingly little coverage for a new franchise which would mean it does not pass WP:GNG either. Can be restored by an admin as soon as they play. Kosack (talk) 07:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:07, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - cannot see from Google that this team even exists. GiantSnowman 08:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication of any other achievements garnering sufficient significant, independent coverage to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 12:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete - Club has not yet played a single match (WP:CRYSTAL), though it is listed on the NPSL website as a current club. Strangely, I find no other mention of the club on Google or Yahoo searches, so WP:GNG is clearly failed. Regarding WP:FOOTYN, there are three prior AFDs (Grand Rapids FC, AFC Ann Arbor, and Oakland United FC) that pointed out a particular ambiguity within the club notability section: All teams that have played in the national cup (or the national level of the league structure in countries where no cup exists) are assumed to meet WP:N criteria. Teams that are not eligible for national cups must be shown to meet broader WP:N criteria. This does not address teams which are eligible to play in the national cup but have not yet done so; overall consensus seems to have developed (see the three prior AFDs) that mere eligibility confers notability, but that is a discussion for elsewhere. To reiterate, I !vote to delete because WP:GNG is failed, and the club has not played a single match so WP:CRYSTAL applies and WP:FOOTYN does not. — Jkudlick ⚓ t ⚓ c ⚓ s 13:35, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
This is probably because of larger team S.S.C. Napoli who play in Italy, the english name for this city is Naples.AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 20:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep CRYSTAL doesn't apply, the team's about to begin their season. Just about every team in the league they're currently in has entered into the U.S. Open Cup, so unless it's clear this team won't also be held to that standard, it meets FOOTYN. This is a case for expansion, not deletion. If the article can't be expanded and improved within a few months, then come back and delete it. I would support deletion then 1000%. There's no rush. South Nashua (talk) 17:01, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Nominator suports this reasoning as superior to deletion If the article can't be expanded and improved within a few months, then come back and delete it. I would support deletion then 1000%. There's no rush. L3X1 (distant write) 19:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC)