Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 December 8

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< December 7 December 9 >

December 8[edit]

Template:Remobox[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template serving no apparent specific purpose other than perhaps to promote its author Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:59, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wuhan Gators[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:48, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

connects only two articles Frietjes (talk) 22:15, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LLSWSQualifiers-Pre2001[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and not needed Frietjes (talk) 22:11, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LKL Teams 05/06[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

old and unused navbox (replaced by templates like Template:LKL) Frietjes (talk) 22:10, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LG smartphones[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, and appears to duplicate other templates (e.g., Template:LG phones, Template:Android smartphones, ...) Frietjes (talk) 22:09, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Korea Squad 2014 FIBA World Championship for Women[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, all redlinks, 13th place squad, roster is saved in 2014 FIBA World Championship for Women squads#Korea Frietjes (talk) 22:06, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Koleje Śląskie lines[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused (and only two templates in Category:Koleje Śląskie templates) Frietjes (talk) 22:00, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1978–1987 Superman film series[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Superman in popular media. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 02:07, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:1978–1987 Superman film series with Template:Superman in popular media.
A lot of the links here are not directly related/do not originate in the film series (characters, locations, etc), so these are not really suitable for inclusion here. If these were to be trimmed, then what we have left could easily be incorporated at {{Superman in popular media}}, if they aren't already. Target could also use some trimming of the parodies, and largely unrelated/tangential entries (Seinfeld, songs which happen to mention Superman etc, etc). --woodensuperman 12:36, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak support. It would be best to merge them and then post a permanent link to how big the template is so others can vote with sufficient information. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:33, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at {{Superman in popular media}} more closely, I think the only link I would consider appropriate to add would be Superman III (soundtrack). The rest are either already included, or inappropriate as I note above. With some of the more spurious links removed per my suggestion above, we could be looking at a substantially smaller template anyway. --woodensuperman 14:15, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 17:53, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge, and trim the main template as suggested. Renata (talk) 16:18, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge but go easy on the trimming (although yes, music and parodies can probably all be removed). Randy Kryn (talk) 10:28, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ed Kowalczyk[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:42, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Too little content to navigate. Fold the couple of relevant articles into Template:Live (band) ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:50, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 17:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, too little content. Renata (talk) 16:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox artist signature[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete feel free to continue the discussion concerning (a) and (b) elsewhere Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:40, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

we should either (a) add a signature parameter to {{infobox artist}}, or (b) don't add signatures to artist infoboxes. either way, we don't need this template to do it. Frietjes (talk) 17:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support the former, (a). This was just a workaround, and Frietjes has shown how to do that better. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:27, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support for (a), just to be consistent with other signature things in bio infoboxes. Many editors are not convinced we should retain them at all. A recent RfC, however, did not conclude with consensus to remove them, so at least do them consistently while they are here.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  15:58, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support (A), signatures are very interesting and relevant additions to some infoboxes. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:30, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support (b), don't add signatures to artist infoboxes. If a signature is of particular interest, it's better presented in context as in Albrecht Dürer or William-Adolphe Bouguereau; if it's not of particular interest it needn't be given prominent display. An artist's biography usually includes several jpgs of the artist's work, and if the artist signs his/her works the signature can be seen there, which makes the signature in an infobox redundant as well as distracting. Ewulp (talk) 02:07, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Arabic name[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 03:47, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox Arabic name with Template:Infobox given name.
Redundancy. Variables should be able to merge. Chicbyaccident (talk) 23:40, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm not sure I see the point of the merge as the two templates don't have any overlap: {{Infobox given name}} is the infobox that goes with articles about given names and has fields about the origin, meaning etc. {{Infobox Arabic name}} on the other hand is a sub-box to be tacked to infoboxes about historic Arab personages and its function is to display in a structured way the various component parts of the typically long name. – Uanfala 00:16, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nihlus 17:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Yuan family tree[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:39, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 17:13, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wikibookssub[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:39, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 17:11, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:39, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, not clear why we need a template for this since it would violate WP:SIG#NT Frietjes (talk) 17:10, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WEByr[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:39, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, most likely replaced by other cat header templates Frietjes (talk) 17:06, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_December_8&oldid=1138373802"