Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Assessment/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

*International Pentecostal Holiness Church - B class article, but has been worked on recentlyl. want someone to review and give any recommendations for further development

  • Lakeland revival -pretty much a completely new article
  • Advent Wreath Added citations and external links, corrected inaccurate content and poor syntax, expanded content. Please consider removing the "needs citations" box and upgrading from "Start" to the next appropriate rating. Thanks! --langohio (talk) 15:27, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
  • LeTourneau University and R. G. LeTourneau – Not yet rated. CarLuva (talk) 03:12, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

-assessed with commentsLtwin (talk) 02:53, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Assessed C with comments on article talk page.Ltwin (talk) 16:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Reassessed Start -> B with comments for further improvement GRBerry 14:58, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Greater Grace World Outreach - Article that has recently undergone bold changes.
  • John Elefante - Pretty much completely new biography and page.
  • Conservative Evangelicalism - New article started by me yesterday, lots of work needed as I've probably written a load of POV rubbish. I'd say it's of high importance and stub to start quality. Perhaps getting someone to say it's pretty bad will encourage others to contribute. Sidefall (talk) 07:17, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Margaret Alva - she is a senior leader of the Indian National Congress and is General Secretary of the All India Congress Committee.-->>Kensplanet (talk) 10:28, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Assessed without comments - SECisek (talk) 15:53, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Removed Margaret Alva for this project scope. Reason is that her relation to Christianity is just being an Indian Christian. We cannot add articles to this project just for the reason that the person is a Christian Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Christianity/Archive_2#Removal_of_tags_from_non-important_indian_chirstians_to_the_Wikiproject_Indian_Christianity - Tinucherian (talk) 04:58, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Left comments for improvement, almost B, but not quite. Pastordavid (talk) 15:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
  • The Adventures of McGee and Me - A prior rater for another project rated it B. Due to the nature of the content, I rated it Stub. The difference is extreme and not justified by article changes between the assessment dates. Could someone review? GRBerry 02:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
    Reassessed as start by the other project. GRBerry 01:10, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Michelle Remembers - I don't think Christianity isn't the best wikiproject though; definitely no longer a stub. WLU (t) (c) (rules - simple rules) 19:10, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

-replaced Christianity project banner with Project Books banner and requested assessment at applicable projects page. Ltwin (talk) 02:59, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Extensively rewrote Old Time Missionary Baptist, adding my first person knowledge of the organization's setup, principles, and doctrines. Joshuaingram 2113, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
    • Outcome is solid material, but doesn't have a single source citation. First person knowledge is useful and welcome, but does not meet reliable source standards. Article will be hard to upgrade much the article much without source citations. Content regarding the organizational power structure, if there is one, also seems to be lacking. With citations and a bit of information on the structure, would probably easily reach B. Right now, I have qualms going higher than C without them. John Carter (talk) 21:22, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

I am responding here, basically because I'm new and not sure where else to do it. What do you mean about "organizational power structure"? I thought that was covered by saying that each church was locally autonomous, meaning that each church is answerable to no one, only it's own members. Please let me know what else needs to be added. Also, I added my main source of information, but it is not yet available on the Web, as far as I know. Let me know if another source, or just an available source, is needed. Joshuaingram 2203, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

  • To keep this page from getting any longer than necessary, responding here.

Comments on importance assessments