Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/April 9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Today's featured article for April 9, 2025
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 9, 2025
Picture of the day for April 9, 2025

The featured picture for this day has not yet been chosen.

In general, pictures of the day are scheduled in order of promotion to featured status. See Wikipedia:Picture of the day/Guidelines for full guidelines.

Alaska in red
Alaska in red



why is he important? Maybe I'm too optimistic, but most of the other people on here are either famous because of a good deed he or she is solely responsible for. (This guy is part of one) I wouldn't object to having that Columbine happened on the page for April 20th. (It's already there.) There are events that are not in the most positive light here too, which isn't a big deal either. Also if a person doesn't have an article (or a very brief one), doesn't that say something? That's why I removed this one too:

He can be put back once he has his own article. Sometimes people are important only for a year or too, and then are pretty much forgotten. This article should celebrate people that will be remembered for a long time (like 50 years). I'm not the only one who thinks he's not important: http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art19344.asp

2012 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 10:30, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2013 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 05:39, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2014 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 06:24, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2015 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 07:29, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2016 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 16:11, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2017 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 01:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2018 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 07:00, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2019 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 16:14, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr

[edit]

Hey @Howcheng:, do you think the blurb for Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr would be suitable for inclusion this year? --Mhhossein talk 07:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mhhossein: I don't think the "Scholarship" section is good enough. Sorry. howcheng {chat} 16:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Howcheng: Thanks for the insight. I should have noticed that myself. I will work on the section and make it ready to become qualified. --Mhhossein talk 06:43, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Howcheng: I have added some more reliable sources for the sake of the verfiability. Can you evaluate the improvements please? The article had never been on the main page. --Mhhossein talk 07:02, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Mhhossein: Look like it's good to go. Nice work! howcheng {chat} 16:15, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 16:38, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2021 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 18:05, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2022 notes

[edit]

howcheng {chat} 07:12, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]