Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Nintendo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Video games (Rated Project-class)
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Project  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by the Nintendo task force.
 
edit·history·watch·refresh Stock post message.svg To-do list for Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Nintendo:

Featured article candidates
Good article nominees
Peer reviews

WPVG icon 2016.svg WikiProject
Video games
Main page talk
Manual of style
Article guidelines talk
Sources talk
  Search engine
Templates
Wikidata Guide
Departments
Assessment
Reference library talk
  Print archive
  Web archive
Newsletter talk
  Current issue Draft
Articles
Article alerts
Deletion discussions
Essential articles
New articles
Recognized content
  Good article Good content
  Featured article Featured content
Requested articles talk

viewtalkeditchanges


Popular pages report[edit]

We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Nintendo/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Video games.

We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:

  • The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
  • The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
  • The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).

We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Video games, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.

Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Fire Emblem GT nomination[edit]

The Fire Emblem good topic nomination is languishing due to lack of consensus. If you have the time to review the topic nomination and leave some comments, I would appreciate it! --haha169 (talk) 14:05, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Xenoblade series article[edit]

A while ago, I attempted to create a page focusing on the Xenoblade series, but it was closed due to it not having enough games to be considered as a series. The members at the time also agreed that it was unnecessary because it was part of the Xeno meta series. Now that we're getting a third Xenoblade game (not including the 3DS port), I feel that the Xenoblade series has more than enough content to justify an article for the series apart from the Xeno (series) article. Even the Xenosaga trilogy has its own article, so I see no reason to not start a page. What are your thoughts? --MomoQca (talk) 17:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

  • If you can create a draft for it and it's more than just a few paragraphs long with proper sourcing, I say go for it. Otherwise, it's fine remaining in the Xeno series article. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 17:43, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
  • I don't feel like much has really changed since the last time you proposed it - there's still only 2 games actually out. It doesn't seem necessary when we've already got an overarching Xeno (series) article, and the individual game articles. You should probably propose this at the main WT:VG page though - there's way more participants there than here, and that's where the last one was held (or at least where input was requested from last time.) Sergecross73 msg me 13:12, 4 August 2017 (UTC)