Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Turtles/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

Trionyx aquitanicus

Trionyx aquitanicus has been added as a species of Trionyx. That isn't a modern name but I was looking to find out what it refers to now. In the Paleobiology Database it is listed as 'Trionyx aquitanicus was named by Delfortrie (1869). It is extant.'

Maybe this paper could help us? Delfortrie, E. 1869. Les chéloniens du Miocène supérieur de la Gironde. Actes Soc. Linnéenne Bordeaux 27:399-440. from http://www.chelonian.org/taxonomic-turtle-literature/ Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 22:58, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Per this entry in the British Museum records it is a partial fossil form the Miocene of France. "Trionyx+aquitanicus"&source=bl&ots=Pd1AXjSZ1y&sig=KBxsrxTUfqhNM8YGUuybl-W-mps&hl=en&sa=X&ei=VMQpUPftCaeoiAK2voDwCg&ved=0CDcQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Fossil%20%22Trionyx%20aquitanicus%22&f=false The PBDB can be spotty at best on areas where there is no active researchers.--Kevmin § 03:34, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Kevmini, the PBDB maybe out of date (my experience) but as they said 'It is extant' I can't help wondering that it referees to some extant turtle. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 07:55, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

WP Turtles in the Signpost

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Turtles for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 05:52, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomenclatural Opinion affecting 2 species.

The ICZN recently handed down its opinions on two cases relevant to us. BZN Opinion 2315 is relevant to the Northern snake-necked turtle in particular but also to the Narrow-breasted snake-necked turtle. The decision was to reject the reversal of names and to maintain priority. This means that the name for the Northern snake-necked turtle is Chelodina (Macrochelodina) oblonga instead of Chelodina (Macrochelodina) rugosa as we have it. It must be said that this may not be popular and that there may be further submissions on this. However, in the interrim the official name for the species is established. The name for the Narrow-breasted snake-necked turtle is confirmed as Chelodina (Macrodiremys) colliei by this decision, which is what we have. We need to decide how we wish to name these species.
The other case is BZN Opinion 2316 which is relevant to the species Aldabra giant tortoise the name has been conserved as Aldabrachelys gigantea which is what we are currently using. This opinion can be cited for those who wish to use one of the alternatives available. Aldabrachelys gigantea is now the official name of this species.
Faendalimas talk 20:49, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Mud turtle problems

See my comment at Talk:Eastern mud turtle. Unless someone provides a better solution, I'll request the page merge within reasonable time. RN1970 (talk) 15:00, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Merge proposal initaited. RN1970 (talk) 15:31, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Aldabran Tortoise Pages

Please see discussion at Talk:Aldabra_giant_tortoise#Proposed_Merge I have also tagged the Dipsochelys page. Faendalimas talk 02:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Image error?

There's a photo image in the "Northern red-bellied cooter" article of an Eastern painted turtle, identified correctly as such by its caption, which enlarges into a page erroneously titled "Northern red-bellied cooter". Considering nowhere in the article on the Northern red-bellied cooter is the Eastern painted turtle even mentioned, the insertion of its image would seem to be a mistake. Thanks ----- Janice Byer, Delaware, USA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janbyer (talk • contribs) 04:54, 24 June 2013 (UTC) P.S. On the article page, I've amended he image caption to clarify it's not the species featured but a related one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janbyer (talk • contribs) 04:01, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Tortoises

I didn't think I would have to bring this up again (I've already been in a couple edit wars over this), but in many varieties of English and for many speakers, tortoises and turtles can be considered mutually distinct families of chelonian—tortoises are land-dwelling, whereas turtles are sea-dwelling. I've seen some edits made by members of WPT arguing that turtles are a superset of tortoises, which is how the matter is considered in at least American English, but not in many other dialects. See this section for additional information.  — TORTOISEWRATH 18:51, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

What exactly is the point and issue here please. All tortoises are turtles, that's what they are, tortoise refers to members of the Testudinidae. In any case the link you provided shows that this is still very innacurate when its applied for vernacular names. For example Australia has one species of semiaquatic turtle, all the rest are aquatic, many completely. Cheers, Faendalimas talk 07:01, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Funnily enough, I just made a related point at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Turtle#Not_correct. In fact, in common UK usage (don't know about scientific usage), all tortoises definitely are not turtles. In common UK usage, turtles live in the sea (or sometimes rivers) and tortoises live on land. 86.130.67.106 (talk) 22:50, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Unfortunately you are looking at this from the point of view of vernacular names, these are innacurate, and varied in their usage, even within countries. There can be no concensus on this as there are so many meanings of the terms. However, the correct names, and the scientific ones, have their placement and need to have priority. This is because they at least have a foundation in descriptive facts about these animals. People keep bringing up common names without any knowledge of how they refer across scientific names. If you are going to take the time to gather information about common names, at least spend the time to learn the scientific names. Also what the term Family means in Zoology. Cheers Faendalimas talk 12:42, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
I did not need to "take time to gather information" because this is common usage and common knoweldge in the UK. Anyone in the UK will tell you the same: tortoises live on land and turtles live in the water. I have no problem with articles using scientific terminology in the main, but common names, and their regional differences, must be correctly explained also. The Turtle article has such a section, which is good, but the information that it gives is incorrect as regards the UK, which is not good. 86.171.43.122 (talk) 17:31, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

"Tortoiseshell"

The usage of Tortoiseshell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) is under discussion, see talk:tortoiseshell material -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 02:45, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live!

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Leaflet For Wikiproject Turtles At Wikimania 2014

Hi all,

My name is Adi Khajuria and I am helping out with Wikimania 2014 in London.

One of our initiatives is to create leaflets to increase the discoverability of various wikimedia projects, and showcase the breadth of activity within wikimedia. Any kind of project can have a physical paper leaflet designed - for free - as a tool to help recruit new contributors. These leaflets will be printed at Wikimania 2014, and the designs can be re-used in the future at other events and locations.

This is particularly aimed at highlighting less discoverable but successful projects, e.g:

• Active Wikiprojects: Wikiproject Medicine, WikiProject Video Games, Wikiproject Film

• Tech projects/Tools, which may be looking for either users or developers.

• Less known major projects: Wikinews, Wikidata, Wikivoyage, etc.

• Wiki Loves Parliaments, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves ____

• Wikimedia thematic organisations, Wikiwomen’s Collaborative, The Signpost

For more information or to sign up for one for your project, go to:
Project leaflets
Adikhajuria (talk) 16:20, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

As of January, the popular pages tool has moved from the Toolserver to Wikimedia Tool Labs. The code has changed significantly from the Toolserver version, but users should notice few differences. Please take a moment to look over your project's list for any anomalies, such as pages that you expect to see that are missing or pages that seem to have more views than expected. Note that unlike other tools, this tool aggregates all views from redirects, which means it will typically have higher numbers. (For January 2014 specifically, 35 hours of data is missing from the WMF data, which was approximated from other dates. For most articles, this should yield a more accurate number. However, a few articles, like ones featured on the Main Page, may be off).

Web tools, to replace the ones at tools:~alexz/pop, will become available over the next few weeks at toollabs:popularpages. All of the historical data (back to July 2009 for some projects) has been copied over. The tool to view historical data is currently partially available (assessment data and a few projects may not be available at the moment). The tool to add new projects to the bot's list is also available now (editing the configuration of current projects coming soon). Unlike the previous tool, all changes will be effective immediately. OAuth is used to authenticate users, allowing only regular users to make changes to prevent abuse. A visible history of configuration additions and changes is coming soon. Once tools become fully available, their toolserver versions will redirect to Labs.

If you have any questions, want to report any bugs, or there are any features you would like to see that aren't currently available on the Toolserver tools, see the updated FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Mr.Z-bot (talk) (for Mr.Z-man) 05:31, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Photo of extinct tortoise?

Korean Expo2012 tortoise

The photo here is labelled as an extinct species on Commons, but not which. Judging on the letters in the background, it seems to be from the Galapagos islands. Anyone know what it is? FunkMonk (talk) 18:44, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Seems to be Galápagos tortoise. Some of the Subspecies of Galápagos tortoise are extinct. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 21:59, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Yeah. Any indication of which subspecies it could be? FunkMonk (talk) 22:06, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Important Request

I have started a discussion ar Talk:Narrow-breasted_snake-necked_turtle#Name_Change_and_Move that I would appreciate discussion on. WP could actually have a lead role and assist with this. Faendalimas talk 10:52, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

how many soft shelled turtles are left in the world?

how many soft shelled turtles are left in the world — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.100.247.28 (talk) 22:52, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

A butterfly feeding on the tears of a turtle in Ecuador

Original – Two Julia Butterflies (Dryas iulia) drinking the tears of turtles in Ecuador

I've nominated A butterfly feeding on the tears of a turtle in Ecuador for Featured Picture consideration.

Discussion is ongoing, at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/A butterfly feeding on the tears of a turtle in Ecuador.

— Cirt (talk) 02:34, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Greetings WikiProject Turtles/Archive 3 Members!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.

Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 18:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Turtles/Archive 3/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Turtles.

We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:

  • The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
  • The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
  • The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).

We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Turtles, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.

Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject

The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

Background

On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you.    — The Transhumanist   07:59, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Request for comment on recommending usage of automatic taxoboxes

There is an RfC regarding recommending usage of automatic taxoboxes at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life#Request for comments: Should the automatic taxobox system be the current recommended practice?. Inviting anybody who watches this page to contribute their thoughts to that thread.

WikiProject Turtles is currently using automatic taxoboxes in 79.2% of project tagged articles that have any form of taxobox. Plantdrew (talk) 01:35, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

A new newsletter directory is out!

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Subscribe to new Tree of Life Newsletter!

"I've never heard so much about crinoids!"

Despite the many Wikipedians who edit content related to organisms/species, there hasn't been a Tree of Life Newsletter...until now! If you would like regular deliveries of said newsletter, please add your name to the subscribers list. Thanks, Enwebb (talk) 00:26, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Active?

Seems little recent activity. Is anyone checking in anymore? Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 20:33, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Turtles deleted.

Portal:Turtles deleted see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Portal:Turtles. Note that Portal:Turtles had 13 page views a day and Portal:Reptiles has a daily average of 14 per day (https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-90&pages=Portal:Reptiles). Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 10:42, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Murray River turtle

It's not clear the correct landing page for Murray River turtle due to a recent split in the taxo. Emydura australis being an option instead of Emydura macquarii. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 10:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Checklist 2017

Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 11:11, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Land turtle

I noticed a redirect Land turtle which goes to Tortoise, is this sourceable? An IP made an alternative claim. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 14:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Never heard the box turtles being called land turtles, I would revert this. Cheers Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 20:16, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Okay. Have reverted. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 01:01, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Asian softshell turtle

Seems a dab or redirect will be required for this term or similar. Been editing of this article. Looking at the 2017 checklist, Nilssonia (turtle) is given, ref 78 on page 231. Asian giant softshell turtle is also used on Cantor's giant softshell turtle. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 18:22, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Several of the asian softshell species are known as Asian Giant Softshell, at least 3 of them. To me the common names are often almost useless if not ambiguous, many referring to several species. Cheers Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 20:18, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
In the process of creating a few disambiguation pages around these names. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 01:03, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Herpetology subgroups.

Cheloniology, Cheloniologist, Testudinology, Testudinologist. These terms seem a bit specific and perhaps don't meet Wikipedia notability. Thoughts? Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 15:48, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Merge to herpetology. There are barely any incoming links from article space. The only references provided are for content that doesn't really belong in the article (phylogeny and conservation aren't very relevant to cheloniology as a discipline). It's not a very good article, the term is over-specialized and not really used much, better just to redirect it. Plantdrew (talk) 15:54, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Sent to Afd. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cheloniology. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 14:25, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Subfamilies of Chelidae

Hi @Sun Creator: noticed you just made a redirect for Chelid subfamilies, typo in Chelinae you have Chelidinae, the name is formed from the genus Chelus, hence is extended to Chelinae. Other two are correct. Cheers Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 22:19, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

I don't recall making redirects. Perhaps you mean I updated the talk page? Or perhaps you could refresh me on which pages I made redirects for. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 22:35, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
My apologies it is an old edit I thought it was part of your changes to to create, anyway this redirect Chelidinae will need to be moved to Chelinae, it also appears on the project page. Cheers Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 22:56, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Well, I changed that but it's now a double redirect as Chelidinae redirect to Chelinae which redirect to Chelidae. So Chelidinae can redirect straight to Chelidae which it how it was. I'm confused! Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 23:44, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
No one ever made pages for the subfamilies, which is probably not necessary. So the only info on them is contained in the page on the family. So the links should have been fro the mentions of the subfamilies on any taxobox that uses them to the family page. However the redirect pages were made. Its a little messy, but there would be very little to say about the subfamilies for pages of their owm. Cheers Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 23:58, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Geoemydinae, Cyclanorbinae, Emydinae, Kinosterninae, Staurotypinae, Trionychinae and Cheloniinae are subfamily articles. However they are all stubs and little can be said in them, perhaps redirect them to the family level. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 00:18, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Checking reptiles

Checking other reptiles I did find that some subfamily article exist, Tomistominae, Gryposuchinae, Mekosuchinae, Brookesiinae although some are missing i.e Litoriinae Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 20:16, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

To do

Taxon updates

Some taxon updates, a few long overdue:

All extant turtles now have one of the automatic taxoboxes {{Automatic taxobox}}, {{Speciesbox}}, {{Subspeciesbox}}, {{Hybridbox}} or {{Hybridbox/lua}}. About 34 extinct turtle articles still have a manual taxobox.

If in doubt of any turtle taxonomy please check the IUCN TTWG 2017 document TURTLES OF THE WORLD Annotated Checklist and Atlas of Taxonomy, Synonymy, Distribution, and Conservation Status (8th Ed.). Especially changes page 15 which has updates since previous edition. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 05:47, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Yes definitely follow this and the Reptile Database I would also suggest that when examining what and why different splits have occurred that they read the annotations in the Turtles of the World PDF, this is open access freely available for download for anyone writing on turtles. The annotations give you all the references and reasoning behind any changes. Cheers Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 14:45, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Taxonbar

All taxon turtle articles now have a {{taxonbar}} template. Sun Creator(talk) 12:32, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Well, except for Arizona mud turtle/Kinosternon arizonense. But that needs to get sorted out in Wikidata and other databases (I just wanted to note the issue here in hopes that it can be revisited as other databases update). Plantdrew (talk) 15:47, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 Done Arizona mud turtle, Kinosternon arizonense and Florida mud turtle are now added/corrected. Sun Creator(talk) 09:34, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

First annual Tree of Life Decemberween contest

After all the fun with the Spooky Species Contest last month, there's a new contest for the (Northern hemisphere's) Winter holidays at Wikipedia:WikiProject Tree of Life/Contest. It's not just Christmas, but anything festive from December-ish. Feel free to add some ideas to the Festive taxa list and enter early and often. --Nessie (talk) 18:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Giant tortoise

Something wants to be done with the article Giant tortoise, it's not taxonomically correct. It's a mixing up of various tortoise genus, species and subspecies that results in a misleading mess. I'm not sure what would be appropriate way to resolve it in this case. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 20:16, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

A disambiguation page like Giant lizard, Giant frog, Large frog. Giant earthworm, Giant squid, Giant octopus seems suitable. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 20:34, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Considering making Giant tortoise (disambiguation). Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 20:51, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
For this to be helpful, I think the phrase Giant tortoise to redirect to Giant tortoise (disambiguation). Right now the problems with Giant tortoise still exist, so I think that article should be considered for deletion and replaced with the disambiguation page. Thoughts? starsandwhales (talk) 14:17, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
agree with delete/ merge of giant tortoise into the various mainspace articles on the various species, retain only the disambig page. Cheers Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk 21:55, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Chelodina colliei versus Chelodina oblonga

I sometimes come across the Southwestern snake-necked turtle on my travels, usually crossing roads, and like to take pictures of them after ensuring they make it safely across. There is however a bit of confusion on Commons about this. Chelodina colliei is, I believe, the correct category and name for the Southwestern snake-necked turtle. There is however also a category Chelodina oblonga, which also states that it is the Southwesterrn snake-necked turtle or Narrow-breasted snake-necked turtle. From what I understand however, Chelodina oblonga is an outdated name and Chelodina rugosa should be used instead, and only for the Northern snake-necked turtle. I'm unqualified to sort this out as I don't fully understand what is correct or not. If an expert could look at this potential mix up it would help other users greatly. Calistemon (talk) 13:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Rosasia

Does anyone have the paper describing Rosasia sotoui? If so, could you provide a citation so I can put it in the article? Thanks!

Borophagus (talk) 11:56, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Nothing substantial. 2016 in paleontology gives a mention in https://www.biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.4200.2.7. Ideally find the original 1940 Carrington da Costa(João Carrington Simões da Costa?) text, which might be in Portuguese or Spanish. A picture and some info is here. Maybe ask for more at WT:PAL and es:Wikiproyecto_discusión:Paleontología
Also thank you for the new articles you've created. Sun Creator(talk) 17:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Turtle

Turtle is currently a good article nomination, Talk:Turtle/GA1. Sun Creator(talk) 13:06, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!

Hello,
Please note that Carapace, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing!
Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 27 December 2021 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team

FAR for Hawksbill sea turtle

I have nominated Hawksbill sea turtle for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. OnlyFixingProse (talk) 22:41, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

User script to detect unreliable sources

Main page: User:Headbomb/unreliable

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

  • John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 21:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Sea Turtle, Inc.#Requested move 1 June 2023

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Sea Turtle, Inc.#Requested move 1 June 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. UtherSRG (talk) 10:48, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Turtles/Archive_3&oldid=1254818161"