User talk:Hamedog

Note:If you post a message here, I will reply here. If I post a message on your talk page, don't reply here. I have your page in my watchlist. This keeps the conversation from breaking.

Archives

User talk:Hamedog/Archive 1: 23 November 2005 – 14 September 2006
User talk:Hamedog/Archive 2: 18 September 2006 - Current

Jellybeans

Here are some Jelly beans for you. I love jelly beans as they have sugar in them and most people love sugar. But on the other hand just receiving somthing from somone else just makes you happy and also just giving this to you makes me happy. I hope to spread the jelly beans all over Wikipedia, so here, you can have this lot. Please enjoy them. (I like the lime ones.)

Editors need a bit of a sugar high too.

An apple a day keeps -The Doctor- away. Or does it! ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

David Beckham

Chocolate

Hi, do you like whittakers chocolae?

2006 Tri Nations Series images

Hey, I was wondering if you could create two more of those starting line-up images for this article? I have added the starting line-ups, and replacements and everything to the article, and all that is needed are those images. Would be great if you could do this, thanks! - Shudda ^talk 00:40, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, if I get time.--Hamedog_Talk|^@ 06:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wallabies

Do you want to help me in order to better this article Wallabies (version française) ? It should be a very nice result... Ddfree 18:09, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If I get time.--Hamedog_Talk|^@ 22:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2007 final

Hey, have started something here. - Shudda ^talk 03:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

Hey, thanks for the RfA nomination. I must decline however. I don't really have any need for the admin powers, and am quite happy contributing the way I am at the moment. I'm really flattered that you nominated me - so please don't be offended that I have declined. Thanks. - Shudda ^talk 01:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries.--Hamedog_Talk|^@ 07:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Hamdog Willkca has been warned that repeating the comments will result in a block please leave the issue alone, in short the comments were offensive statements about staff, student and parents of student at the school including names. Gnan garra 02:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you deleted the edits? Yes, sorry about this I was curious as to what had happened, not trying to re-start the fire or anything. Was I mentioned?--Hamedog_Talk|^@ 02:21, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What was said was deleted, there is no need for further comments. If you have concerns raise it WP:AN/I. Gnan garra 03:16, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you make it sound like I have done something wrong.--Hamedog_Talk|^@ 03:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LIBEL is the official position of Wikipedia, please read it Gnan garra 03:53, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also Slander_and_libel#Australian_law Gnan garra 03:55, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Come on- just stay off the issue or a more adventurous admin will block you on the spot, Stay out of the issue and dont leave anything on any page to do with the issue. Simple as that. Satu Suro 03:56, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware of slander and libel but I don't think Australian Law applies in this situation as the offence technically occurs in Florida, coming under United States Law (as Wikipedia's servers are hosted there). On what grounds would I be blocked? As far as I am aware I have just made an inquirey into the events that occured on the talk page of an article I have made major contributions too (a mouthful!).--Hamedog_Talk|^@ 03:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Having read Slander_and_libel#Australian_law, I take back some of the comments made earlier. But I have not made claims that could be regarded as libel (at least not recently :P)--Hamedog_Talk|^@ 04:02, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you asked about the willkca comments, They are why I have referred to those links, I have ask you to cease I'm now officially warning you that continuation of this is disruptive and are asking people to violate Australian law as that article link indicates. I am also requesting that you move this discussion to your current archive once you have read this message. Gnan garra 04:08, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would suspect that anyone with knowledge of wikipedia policies - reviewing the situation can clearly state that any attempt to circulate or any way show knowledge of, or circulate the willkca comments back into circulation makes you party to the issue. Archive now, so you will not regret !Satu Suro 04:14, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have this page set up so it is achived every 16 days. I don't believe I have done anything wrong, I just wanted to know what had occured on the Scotch College talk page, an article I have heavily contributed to. In no way am I trying to help anyone spread material that could be regarded by the courts as libel.

Just a small tip - there's an old saying "choose your battles", this is *really* not worth going down over in my opinion. The above people aren't taking personal issue with you, it's the job of an admin to watch out for this kind of stuff to ensure Wikimedia Foundation doesn't get sued. Orderinchaos 05:14, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to see WF getting sued either. I was simply trying to find out what occurred on the talk page of Scotch College, Perth, an article I worked on to get up to GA status. I am sure 95% of editors would also like to know what occurred on the talk page of an article they have made major contributions. I no way am I condoning or attempting to aid the spread of this material - the edits are deleted after all, but I was very interested in why such a fuss was thrown up by admin following these edits. I have not done a thing wrong so I will not archive now - this discussion is still active in my mind.--Hamedog_Talk|^@ 01:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are your own undoing mate - you have what some police, ambulance and fire workers call it the I have to see the car crash/fire syndrome - long standing editors and admins have perused the talk page item and deemed it inappropriate - If you cannot hack that try worrying about something else. There is something wrong in wanting to resurrect or spark interest in an item that is no longer there - leave well alone. It has absolutely not one iota or anything to do with making wikipedia a better encyclopedia.Satu Suro 05:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I don't believe that I was trying to "spark interest" - as I have restated numerous times, I was curious as to why edits were deleted from the talk page of an article I have made major contributions to. It concerns me - I don't want to see WF get sued but I had genuine interest in what occured - both the Scotch article and user talk page were in my watchlist before the events. How long is long enough to be regarded as a long standing editor - I've been here for a year and a half and don't deem it inappropriate. Maybe this has dragged on for too long, maybe not, but much of it has revolved around me trying to defend myself and my actions. No, I was not spreading libel related material and I wasn't trying to restart a spread of libel; I wanted to have knowledge of what had occured. As a "kinda harsh" end note, some people call these kinds of actions the sign of a cabal. But thats just a conspiracy theory - or is it?--Hamedog_Talk|^@ 07:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Archived

That discussion is now in your archive2, and should remain there. Willkca has already apologised for the comments so its finished with. Gnan garra 06:22, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have reinstated it has I believe the discussion is still active. A bot will archive when the discussion becomes in active.--Hamedog_Talk|^@ 07:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Gnan garra 00:58, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hamedog (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not regard my actions as trolling in any way. Firstly, I have not encourgaged others to break Australian law in any way. I was enquiring as to why an edit was deleted from the talk page of Scotch College, Perth, an article I have heavily contributed too. I made this enquiring on the user talk page of the user (Willkca) who made the deleted edits (his talk page was on my watchlist due to me creating that page). Following some warnings, which I felt were unnecessary, I contacted Willkca via email, who send me the deleted text. Gnangarra and Orderinchaos also contacted me via email with the latter also sending me the deleted text. On my talk page, other events, which you can see above, were occuring, with Gnangarra accusing me of requesting people, namely Willkca, to break Australian law - "are asking people to violate Australian law". At no stage, in my mind, was I doing this, I was enquiring into what events occured, which I was attempting to do the whole time. I do not support the spread of slander or libel (in this case as its written) and I don't want to see the Wikimedia Foundation getting sued either. As you can see above, the claimed trolling is me defending my actions against SatuSuro and Gnangarra with Orderinchaos offering some advice. I believe this block is totally unjust and would like to see Gnangarra side of the story or rebuttal. I would also like the actions of Gnangarra, an admin, to be reviewed. I would also like to note that I can not access my email at this time. Thank You.--HamedogTalk

Decline reason:

reason — No. You were warned, and you persisted. Please wait out your block. ⇒ SWATJester ^{Denny Crane.} 08:35, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also, in reply to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Hamedog_--_Block, I can't find were I believe the comments may of been about myself unless it was in an email. At no point do I believe I have pushed the "Since then Hamedog has continued to push the I want to know its my right and every body elses to know the comment line". And besides, if I am being blocked under WP:LIBEL, then shouldn't this blocked be reverted as I am currently not blocked for breaking WP:LIBEL but for trolling? Also, my previous block wasn't for vandalism but was for "mis-using" WP:AIV under the belief my account was compromised.--Hamedog_Talk|^@ 05:09, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

note this dif "was I mentioned?" and this reinstating the discussion on your talk page after inital request to remove it where declined stating the matter wasnt closed. Gnan garra 06:20, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leaving Wikipedia

It appears I am not allowed to leave Wikipedia via an IP address (see revert on my user page by User:Pilotguy and the block of the IP address 202.135.64.225).--Hamedog_Talk|^@

Leaving

Hey, yes I have seen whats been going on here. I think it's a shame you are going to leave over it, but I do sympathize with you. Your contributions to wikipedia have been appreciated by many, and maybe now you'll see why I don't really want to be an administrator! ;-) Anyway, I'm trying to create biographical stubs of all the French players here at the moment so bests be off - there is bugger all info out there on them - even in French! Anyway, good luck with whatever you get up to in the future. - Shudda ^talk 05:35, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks mate. - Shudda ^talk 05:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Dave Gallagher Trophy.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Dave Gallagher Trophy.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Carl (CBM · talk) 20:09, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:SC_Pipe_Band_pose.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:SC_Pipe_Band_pose.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:53, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Red Bull Task Force

The Red Bull task force is fairly quiet, and has a grand total of 21 articles in its scope, and 4 members. Since there are many articles in the air sports area that have no project to look after them, and since Red Bulls articles would fall under the air sports scope, would you object to the scope of the task force being expanded to include air sports, and the task force being renamed and retasked as the Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Air sports task force? - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 16:03, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Chris Cairns final.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Chris Cairns final.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Bledisloe_cup.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Bledisloe_cup.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:12, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:2003_RWC_5_Dollar_Uncirculated_Coin.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:2003_RWC_5_Dollar_Uncirculated_Coin.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 22:51, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ponting_and_Fleming.jpg

I have tagged Image:Ponting_and_Fleming.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 16:48, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:NZI pavlova.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:NZI pavlova.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:32, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LePontd'Avignon.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:LePontd'Avignon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Ranfurly Shield.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Ranfurly Shield.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 20:06, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Red Bull Air Race Logo.PNG

A tag has been placed on File:Red Bull Air Race Logo.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 00:26, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scotch badge.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Scotch badge.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 22:35, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Super 12 Trophy.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Super 12 Trophy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 22:41, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:CrusadersMistHurricanes.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:CrusadersMistHurricanes.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 22:45, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lomu Mike Catt steamroll.PNG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lomu Mike Catt steamroll.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 22:49, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An exciting opportunity to get involved!

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 00:35, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:WesternForceBlueLogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:WesternForceBlueLogo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 02:37, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Warne 700 Cricinfo Screenshot.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Warne 700 Cricinfo Screenshot.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:42, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Db-c2

Template:Db-c2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:12, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Nicolas_Ivanoff.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:Nicolas_Ivanoff.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:23, 25 June 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 17:23, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Nicolas_Ivanoff.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:Nicolas_Ivanoff.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:23, 25 June 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 17:23, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Closed Waiters.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:11, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yamaha Jubilo halfback dive pass.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yamaha Jubilo halfback dive pass.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 18:45, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greatest cricket match listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Greatest cricket match. Since you had some involvement with the Greatest cricket match redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Super 12 Champions

Template:Super 12 Champions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:35, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wellington Lions logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wellington Lions logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Subject Exhibitions

The article Subject Exhibitions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this award is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Steve Jones Perth racing.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Steve Jones Perth racing.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:48, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]