User talk:Jrclark

Welcome!

Archives

Josh Romney

I have proposed this article for merger with Mitt Romney. Please refer to the discussion page for my reasoning and if you would like to make any comments. Mstuczynski (talk) 18:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have now nominated this article for deletion as we were unable to come to a concensus. You may find the discussion under WP:Articles for deletion/Josh Romney. Mstuczynski (talk) 22:41, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: As it stands now, I believe it qualifies under the Politician guidelines and should remain for the next few weeks.

I understand you are interested in this subject, but if you could point to some aspect of politician qualifications, or basic qualifications where he fits, it would go a long way towards saving the page. Please understand, I have nothing against Romney, but until he is actually notable for something he, himself has done, I feel forced to persue this line of action. Please read Notability is not Temporary. Might I add, I did not want him deleted in the first place. That is why I tagged the article for merger and notified you of my actions. Mstuczynski (talk) 00:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They called me an {{oaf}}. The article survives. Congrats. Mstuczynski (talk) 16:52, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Josh Romney

An editor has nominated Josh Romney, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Romney and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vertical drop

Thanks for the heads up. Jrclark, I think it would be good for everyone involved if the vertical drop issue could be brought to the Wiki ski project page & aired out there. Perhaps you could copy and paste your conversation with the person you were communicating with onto that project discussion page. With regard to Nhguardian and potential sock puppets, as you can see from my post to that user, I'm aware of that possibility. I'm withholding my own judgment on the matter until I see how Willdakunta conducts him/herself. If s/he resorts to edit warring and POV pushing instead of working for consensus, then, obviously, the sockpuppeting conclusion will be very difficult to refute. At this point, however, I see no reason not to give this username the benefit of a doubt & wait to see what happens. As for the vertical drop changes s/he has made, I asked him/her to refrain and instead bring the issue to the Wiki ski project page. His/her willingness to do so, and seek consensus, will, again go a long way in determining the origin of his/her edits. --Pgagnon999 (talk) 16:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the ANI and SSP reports have come to fruition; the user and all socks have been blocked; two of them indefinately. This should form a good basis for dealing with any further abuse from this user. --Pgagnon999 (talk) 00:57, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Yes, indeed...thank you again for your help. Just FYI, there's a slight chance I might do either a long Pocumtuck Range hike or a short one in the near future - are there any other photos you need for that project? Jrclark (talk) 02:05, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Raimer

Do you know anything about the defunct ski area on Mount Raimer?--Pgagnon999 (talk) 03:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing in particular. I hiked that trail a few years ago & just wrote an article about the mountain; thought it would be good to have info on the previous ski area. Thanks!--Pgagnon999 (talk) 04:18, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks; the photo looks good.--Pgagnon999 (talk) 22:23, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mt. Whittier ski area

Is it Mt. Whittier or Mount Whittier?--Pgagnon999 (talk) 13:58, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The ski area almost always called itself Mt. Whittier (I spent awhile asking myself the same question and researching through the Whittier stuff I own before I created the article). Of course, it's not located on the real Mount Whittier, which is northwest of the ski area. Jrclark (talk) 14:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NELSAP prepositions ...

Yes, I have trouble on them - er, in them - er, with them. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 17:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:) Jrclark (talk) 18:13, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Swimmin' in a fish bowl

Actually, the overall music on both looks to be the same; just that its distributed differently across sides of the cartridge. indopug (talk) 23:07, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Minot Dole

You're welcome, and thanks for writing the article. I came across the grave markers and photographed them just in case there was an article, and there it was. Cheers! -- Mwanner | Talk 19:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Mackinac Island Ferry Companies

I have nominated List of Mackinac Island Ferry Companies, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mackinac Island Ferry Companies. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 18:27, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Wait for Me (Moby album)

I have nominated Wait for Me (Moby album), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wait for Me (Moby album). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. –Dream out loud (talk) 17:54, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Petersburg-2002-0309d.jpg

File:Petersburg-2002-0309d.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Mount Raimer 2002.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Mount Raimer 2002.JPG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 18:44, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Southsugarloafprofile.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Southsugarloafprofile.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haystack-2006-0625a.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Haystack-2006-0625a.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:52, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oak

For most bands or musical ensembles, they must have released albums for them to be notable and significant. In this case, they are yet to release an album. Perhaps, as of now, we can merge any useful info from Oak to Joplin's. --Efe (talk) 00:41, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cold case

What cold case legislation did you mean in this post? SpinningSpark 23:29, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SpinningSpark, I haven't searched Wiki for it, but the New Hampshire Senate has been working on creating at Cold Case Unit this month. As such, this half decade old case, which is still fairly well known in NH, is being pushed to the spotlight again. Jrclark (talk) 01:05, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thanks, I see now. I had misunderstood what you might have meant. SpinningSpark 21:16, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Sleepers

[1] I'm sorry. I do not seem to have read the contents of the article properly. English Wikipedia was a bot made a false linkage painting [2]. In future, try to avoid the kinds of edits. I deleted the English Wikipedia side in an incorrect linkage. Yours sincerely, -Ville Siliämaa (talk) 10:36, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Johnstephennh.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Johnstephennh.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 15:49, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links

Hello... with respect to the link you wish to add, please allow discussion to establish its validity first, per the external links guideline. At present, there are issues with adding the site, including its advertising and the lack of any indication as to the accuracy of the material presented. This is not intended as a slight against the site; however, the fact a site exists does not automatically mean that Wikipedia should link to it. Wikipedia is not a directory service; in addition, the site you're advocating has been used as a reference in some articles which is even more problematic. (Even if the external links are kept, the references would need to be removed unless there is a clear case establishing the site's accuracy and reliability.) --Ckatz^chat _spy 18:15, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Linked site is affiliated with and cited by other sites not removed from articles, which also feature minimal advertising. Site contains detailed historical information and photos, both of which are used in Wiki articles. Data is well researched, site cited in major publications, and has not been called into question. Only one user as been removing the link (while not removing any other links). Jrclark (talk) 18:20, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note that, per your above statement, you are the one adding many of these links. --Ckatz^chat _spy 18:23, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am a frequent contributor to skiing articles on Wikipedia and add many links while expanding articles and adding photos. For whatever reason, you seem to single out this one. Jrclark (talk) 18:26, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Snow Machines, Inc.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Snow Machines, Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 03:45, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amesbury Sports Park

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amesbury Sports Park requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Roger (talk) 19:33, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amesbury Sports Park for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amesbury Sports Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amesbury Sports Park until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Go Phightins! 20:55, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Snow tubing areas in Canada

Category:Snow tubing areas in Canada, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 02:00, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Snow tubing areas in the United States

Category:Snow tubing areas in the United States, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 04:40, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Belknapmtnprofile.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:07, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Berkshire East Ski Area Main Lodge.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:13, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Blackcapprofile.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Catamount Massachusetts Schoolhouse Monument.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alpine slide may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [http://www.newenglandskihistory.com/topics/alpineslides.php Alpine Slides in New England[/URL] -

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Among the Oak & Ash

The article Among the Oak & Ash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

My searches simply found nothing better than a few passing mentions and Josh Joplin's article also seems questionably notable, this would've been an easy A7 if not for the Verve label but nothing else notable aside from that.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister talk 06:53, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The Dave Ramsey Show

The page The Dave Ramsey Show has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguated only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ended in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguated zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
was a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that did not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:31, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]