Jump to content

Huygens (spacecraft): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Findings: Added misc. details, from 2005 NATURE paper by Tomasko et al..
Line 54: Line 54:
Early imaging of Titan from the Cassini mission was consistent with the presence of large bodies of liquid on the surface. The photos showed what appeared to be large drainage channels crossing the lighter coloured mainland into a dark sea. Some of the photos suggested islands and mist shrouded coastline. On January 18 it was reported that ''Huygens'' landed in "Titanian mud"<!--, and the landing site was estimated to lie within the white circle on the picture to the left-->. Mission scientists also reported a first "descent profile", which describes the trajectory the probe took during its descent.
Early imaging of Titan from the Cassini mission was consistent with the presence of large bodies of liquid on the surface. The photos showed what appeared to be large drainage channels crossing the lighter coloured mainland into a dark sea. Some of the photos suggested islands and mist shrouded coastline. On January 18 it was reported that ''Huygens'' landed in "Titanian mud"<!--, and the landing site was estimated to lie within the white circle on the picture to the left-->. Mission scientists also reported a first "descent profile", which describes the trajectory the probe took during its descent.


Subsequent work done on the probe's trajectory indicated that, in fact, it landed within the dark 'sea' region in the photos. Photos of a dry landscape from the surface suggested that while there was evidence of liquid acting on the surface recently, hydrocarbon lakes and/or seas might not currently exist at the ''Huygens'' landing site. Further data from the Cassini Mission, however, definitely confirmed the existence of permanent liquid hydrocarbon lakes in the polar regions of Titan (see [[Lakes of Titan]]). Long-standing tropical hydrocarbon lakes were also discovered in 2012 (including one not far from the ''Huygens'' landing site in the Shangri-La region which is about half the size of Utah's [[Great Salt Lake]], with a depth of at least 1 meter). The likely supplier in dry desert areas is probably underground [[aquifers]], in other words the arid equatorial regions of Titan contain "[[oases]]".<ref name=caltech>{{cite web|title=Tropical Methane Lakes on Saturn's Moon Titan|work=saturntoday.com|date=2012|url=http://www.saturntoday.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=37429|accessdate=June 16, 2012}}</ref>
Subsequent work done on the probe's trajectory indicated that, in fact, it landed within the dark 'sea' region in the photos. Photos of a dry lakebed like landscape from the surface suggested that while there was evidence of liquid acting on the surface recently, hydrocarbon lakes and/or seas might not currently exist at the ''Huygens'' landing site. Further data from the Cassini Mission, however, definitely confirmed the existence of permanent liquid hydrocarbon lakes in the polar regions of Titan (see [[Lakes of Titan]]). Long-standing tropical hydrocarbon lakes were also discovered in 2012 (including one not far from the ''Huygens'' landing site in the Shangri-La region which is about half the size of Utah's [[Great Salt Lake]], with a depth of at least 1 meter). The likely supplier in dry desert areas is probably underground [[aquifers]], in other words the arid equatorial regions of Titan contain "[[oases]]".<ref name=caltech>{{cite web|title=Tropical Methane Lakes on Saturn's Moon Titan|work=saturntoday.com|date=2012|url=http://www.saturntoday.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=37429|accessdate=June 16, 2012}}</ref>


At the landing site there were indications of chunks of water ice scattered over an orange surface, the majority of which is covered by a thin haze of [[methane]]. The instruments revealed "a dense cloud or thick haze approximately 18-20 kilometers from the surface". The surface itself was reported to be a [[clay]]-like "material which might have a thin crust followed by a region of relative uniform consistency." One ESA scientist compared the texture and colour of Titan's surface to a [[crème brûlée]], but admitted this term probably would not appear in the published papers.
At the landing site there were indications of chunks of water ice scattered over an orange surface, the majority of which is covered by a thin haze of [[methane]]. The instruments revealed "a dense cloud or thick haze approximately 18-20 kilometers from the surface". The surface itself was reported to be a [[clay]]-like "material which might have a thin crust followed by a region of relative uniform consistency." One ESA scientist compared the texture and colour of Titan's surface to a [[crème brûlée]], but admitted this term probably would not appear in the published papers.


Subsequent analysis of the data suggests that surface consistency readings were likely caused by ''Huygens'' displacing a large pebble as it landed, and that the surface is better described as a "sand" made of ice grains.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4417503.stm Titan probe's pebble 'bash-down'], BBC News, April 10, 2005.</ref> The images taken after the probe's landing show a flat plain covered in pebbles. The pebbles, which may be made of water ice, are somewhat rounded, which may indicate the action of fluids on them.<ref>[http://www.planetary.org/news/2005/0115_The_Planetary_Societys_Huygens_Weblog.html New Images from the Huygens Probe: Shorelines and Channels, But an Apparently Dry Surface], Emily Lakdawalla, January 15, 2005, verified March 28, 2005</ref>
Subsequent analysis of the data suggests that surface consistency readings were likely caused by ''Huygens'' displacing a large pebble as it landed, and that the surface is better described as a "sand" made of ice grains.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4417503.stm Titan probe's pebble 'bash-down'], BBC News, April 10, 2005.</ref> The images taken after the probe's landing show a flat plain covered in pebbles. The pebbles, which may be made of hydrocarbon-coated water ice, are somewhat rounded, which may indicate the action of fluids on them.<ref>[http://www.planetary.org/news/2005/0115_The_Planetary_Societys_Huygens_Weblog.html New Images from the Huygens Probe: Shorelines and Channels, But an Apparently Dry Surface], Emily Lakdawalla, January 15, 2005, verified March 28, 2005</ref> The rockets appear to be rounded, size-selected and size-layered as though located in the bed of a stream within the large dark lakebed, which consists of finer-grained material. No pebbles larger than 15 centimeters across were spotted while rocks smaller than 5 cm are rare on the ''Huygens'' landing site. This implies large pebbles cannot be transported to the lakebed, while small rocks are quickly removed from the surface. <ref name=nature/>


Thermometers indicated that heat was wicked away from ''Huygens'' so quickly that the ground must have been damp, and one image shows light reflected by a dewdrop as it falls across the camera's field of view. On Titan, the feeble sunlight allows only about one centimeter of evaporation per year (versus one meter of water on Earth), but the atmosphere can hold the equivalent of about 10 meters of liquid before rain forms vs. only a few centimeters on Earth. So Titan's weather is expected to feature torrential downpours causing flash floods, interspersed by decades or centuries of drought.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/scientificamerican0310-36 |url=http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-moon-that-would-be-a-planet |title=The Moon That Would Be a Planet |date=2010 |last1=Lorenz |first1=Ralph |last2=Sotin |first2=Christophe |journal=Scientific American |volume=302 |issue=3 |pages=36–43 |pmid=20184181}}</ref>
The temperature at the landing site was 93.8 [[Kelvin|K]] and pressure of 1467.6 [[mbar]], implying a methane abundance of 5 ± 1% and [[relative humidity]] of 50% near the surface. Therefore, ground fogs caused by methane in the neighborhood of the landing site are unlikely.<ref name=nature/> Thermometers indicated that heat was wicked away from ''Huygens'' so quickly that the ground must have been damp, and one image shows light reflected by a dewdrop as it falls across the camera's field of view. On Titan, the feeble sunlight allows only about one centimeter of evaporation per year (versus one meter of water on Earth), but the atmosphere can hold the equivalent of about 10 meters of liquid before rain forms vs. only a few centimeters on Earth. So Titan's weather is expected to feature torrential downpours causing flash floods, interspersed by decades or centuries of drought.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/scientificamerican0310-36 |url=http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-moon-that-would-be-a-planet |title=The Moon That Would Be a Planet |date=2010 |last1=Lorenz |first1=Ralph |last2=Sotin |first2=Christophe |journal=Scientific American |volume=302 |issue=3 |pages=36–43 |pmid=20184181}}</ref>


Huygens found the brightness of the surface of Titan (at the time of landing) to be about a thousand times dimmer than full solar illumination on the Earth (or 500 times brighter than illumination by full moonlight). That is, the illumination level was about that experienced about 10 min after sunset on the Earth. The color of the sky and the scene on Titan is mainly orange due to the much greater attenuation of blue light by Titan's haze relative to red light. The Sun (wbich was comparatively high in the sky when Huygens landed, would be visible as a small, bright spot, ten times smaller than the solar disk seen from Earth, comparable in size and brightness to a car headlight seen from about 150 m away) casts sharp shadows, but of low contrast, because some 90% of the illumination comes from the sky. <ref>[http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v438/n7069/full/nature04126.html Rain, winds and haze during the Huygens probe's descent to Titan's surface], Nature, November 30, 2005.</ref>
''Huygens'' found the brightness of the surface of Titan (at the time of landing) to be about a thousand times dimmer than full solar illumination on the Earth (or 500 times brighter than illumination by full moonlight). That is, the illumination level was about that experienced about 10 min after sunset on the Earth. The color of the sky and the scene on Titan is mainly orange due to the much greater attenuation of blue light by Titan's haze relative to red light. The Sun (which was comparatively high in the sky when ''Huygens'' landed) would be visible as a small, bright spot, ten times smaller than the solar disk seen from Earth, comparable in size and brightness to a car headlight seen from about 150 meters away. It casts sharp shadows, but of low contrast, because some 90% of the illumination comes from the sky.
<ref name=nature>{{cite web|title=Rain, winds and haze during the Huygens probe's descent to Titan's surface|work=nature.com|date=2005|url=http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v438/n7069/full/nature04126.html|accessdate=January 19, 2015}}</ref>
{{-}}
{{-}}



Revision as of 15:26, 19 January 2015

Template:Infobox spacecraft Huygens was an atmospheric entry probe that landed successfully on Saturn's moon Titan in 2005. Built and operated by the European Space Agency (ESA), it was part of the Cassini–Huygens mission and became the first spacecraft ever to land on Titan. The probe was named after the Dutch 17th-century astronomer Christiaan Huygens,[1] who discovered Titan in 1655.

The combined Cassini–Huygens spacecraft was launched from Earth on October 15, 1997.[1] Huygens separated from the Cassini orbiter on December 25, 2004, and landed on Titan on January 14, 2005 near the Xanadu region.[2] This was the first landing ever accomplished in the outer Solar System.[3] It touched down on land, although the possibility that it would touch down in an ocean was also taken into account in its design. The probe was designed to gather data for a few hours in the atmosphere, and possibly a short time at the surface. It continued to send data for about 90 minutes after touchdown. It remains the most distant landing of any man-made craft.

Overview

Huygens was designed to enter and brake in Titan's atmosphere and parachute a fully instrumented robotic laboratory down to the surface. When the mission was planned, it was not yet certain whether the landing site would be a mountain range, a flat plain, an ocean, or something else, and it was hoped that analysis of data from Cassini would help to answer these questions.

The first image released, taken from an altitude of 16 km, showing what are speculated to be drainage channels flowing to a possible shoreline. The darker areas are flat plains, while the lighter areas represent high ground.

Based on pictures taken by Cassini at 1,200 km away from Titan, the landing site appeared to be a shoreline. Assuming the landing site could be non-solid, Huygens was designed to survive the impact, splash down on a liquid surface on Titan, and send back data for several minutes on the conditions there. If that occurred it was expected to be the first time a human-made probe would land in an extraterrestrial ocean. The spacecraft had no more than three hours of battery life, most of which was planned to be taken up by the descent. Engineers expected to get at most only 30 minutes of data from the surface.

Cutaway image of Huygens

The Huygens probe system consists of the 318 kg probe itself, which descended to Titan, and the probe support equipment (PSE), which remained attached to the orbiting spacecraft. Huygens' heat shield was 2.7 m in diameter; after ejecting the shield, the probe was 1.3 m in diameter. The PSE included the electronics necessary to track the probe, to recover the data gathered during its descent, and to process and deliver the data to the orbiter, from which it transmitted or "downlinked" to the ground.

The probe remained dormant throughout the 6.7-year interplanetary cruise, except for semiannual health checks.[4] These checkouts followed preprogrammed descent scenario sequences as closely as possible, and the results were relayed to Earth for examination by system and payload experts. Navigation to Saturn, and specifically to Titan, was a very complicated process in and of itself, and was coordinated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA JPL), with astrometric navigation frames provided by various institutions such as the United States Naval Observatory Flagstaff Station.

Prior to the probe's separation from the orbiter on December 25, 2004, a final health check was performed. The "coast" timer was loaded with the precise time necessary to turn on the probe systems (15 minutes before its encounter with Titan's atmosphere), then the probe detached from the orbiter and coasted in free space to Titan in 22 days with no systems active except for its wake-up timer.

The main mission phase was a parachute descent through Titan's atmosphere. The batteries and all other resources were sized for a Huygens mission duration of 153 minutes, corresponding to a maximum descent time of 2.5 hours plus at least 3 additional minutes (and possibly a half hour or more) on Titan's surface. The probe's radio link was activated early in the descent phase, and the orbiter "listened" to the probe for the next 3 hours, including the descent phase, and the first thirty minutes after touchdown. Not long after the end of this three-hour communication window, Cassini's high-gain antenna (HGA) was turned away from Titan and towards Earth.

Very large radio telescopes on Earth were also listening to Huygens' 10-watt transmission using the technique of very long baseline interferometry and aperture synthesis mode. At 11:25 CET on January 14, the Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope (GBT) in West Virginia detected the carrier signal from Huygens. The GBT continued to detect the carrier signal well after Cassini stopped listening to the incoming data stream. In addition to the GBT, eight of the ten telescopes of the continent-wide VLBA in North America, located at Pie Town and Los Alamos, New Mexico; Fort Davis, Texas; North Liberty, Iowa; Kitt Peak, Arizona; Brewster, Washington; Owens Valley, California; and Mauna Kea, Hawaii, also listened for the Huygens signal.

The signal strength received on Earth from Huygens was comparable to that from the Galileo probe (the Jupiter atmospheric descent probe) as received by the VLA, and was therefore too weak to detect in real time because of the signal modulation by the (then) unknown telemetry. Instead, wide-band recordings of the probe signal were made throughout the three-hour descent. After the probe telemetry was finished being relayed from Cassini to Earth, the now-known data modulation was stripped off the recorded signal, leaving a pure carrier that could be integrated over several seconds to determine the probe frequency. It was expected that through analysis of the Doppler shifting of Huygens' signal as it descended through the atmosphere of Titan, wind speed and direction could be determined with some degree of accuracy. A determination of Huygens' landing site on Titan was found with exquisite precision (within one km – one km on Titan measures 1.3' latitude and longitude at the equator) using the Doppler data at a distance from Earth of about 1.2 billion kilometers. The probe landed on the surface of the moon at 10°12′S 192°24′W / 10.2°S 192.4°W / -10.2; -192.4. A similar technique was used to determine the landing site of the Mars exploration rovers by listening to their telemetry alone.

A summary of knowledge in the decade after the Huygens probe landed on Titan.[5]

Findings

Early imaging of Titan from the Cassini mission was consistent with the presence of large bodies of liquid on the surface. The photos showed what appeared to be large drainage channels crossing the lighter coloured mainland into a dark sea. Some of the photos suggested islands and mist shrouded coastline. On January 18 it was reported that Huygens landed in "Titanian mud". Mission scientists also reported a first "descent profile", which describes the trajectory the probe took during its descent.

Subsequent work done on the probe's trajectory indicated that, in fact, it landed within the dark 'sea' region in the photos. Photos of a dry lakebed like landscape from the surface suggested that while there was evidence of liquid acting on the surface recently, hydrocarbon lakes and/or seas might not currently exist at the Huygens landing site. Further data from the Cassini Mission, however, definitely confirmed the existence of permanent liquid hydrocarbon lakes in the polar regions of Titan (see Lakes of Titan). Long-standing tropical hydrocarbon lakes were also discovered in 2012 (including one not far from the Huygens landing site in the Shangri-La region which is about half the size of Utah's Great Salt Lake, with a depth of at least 1 meter). The likely supplier in dry desert areas is probably underground aquifers, in other words the arid equatorial regions of Titan contain "oases".[6]

At the landing site there were indications of chunks of water ice scattered over an orange surface, the majority of which is covered by a thin haze of methane. The instruments revealed "a dense cloud or thick haze approximately 18-20 kilometers from the surface". The surface itself was reported to be a clay-like "material which might have a thin crust followed by a region of relative uniform consistency." One ESA scientist compared the texture and colour of Titan's surface to a crème brûlée, but admitted this term probably would not appear in the published papers.

Subsequent analysis of the data suggests that surface consistency readings were likely caused by Huygens displacing a large pebble as it landed, and that the surface is better described as a "sand" made of ice grains.[7] The images taken after the probe's landing show a flat plain covered in pebbles. The pebbles, which may be made of hydrocarbon-coated water ice, are somewhat rounded, which may indicate the action of fluids on them.[8] The rockets appear to be rounded, size-selected and size-layered as though located in the bed of a stream within the large dark lakebed, which consists of finer-grained material. No pebbles larger than 15 centimeters across were spotted while rocks smaller than 5 cm are rare on the Huygens landing site. This implies large pebbles cannot be transported to the lakebed, while small rocks are quickly removed from the surface. [9]

The temperature at the landing site was 93.8 K and pressure of 1467.6 mbar, implying a methane abundance of 5 ± 1% and relative humidity of 50% near the surface. Therefore, ground fogs caused by methane in the neighborhood of the landing site are unlikely.[9] Thermometers indicated that heat was wicked away from Huygens so quickly that the ground must have been damp, and one image shows light reflected by a dewdrop as it falls across the camera's field of view. On Titan, the feeble sunlight allows only about one centimeter of evaporation per year (versus one meter of water on Earth), but the atmosphere can hold the equivalent of about 10 meters of liquid before rain forms vs. only a few centimeters on Earth. So Titan's weather is expected to feature torrential downpours causing flash floods, interspersed by decades or centuries of drought.[10]

Huygens found the brightness of the surface of Titan (at the time of landing) to be about a thousand times dimmer than full solar illumination on the Earth (or 500 times brighter than illumination by full moonlight). That is, the illumination level was about that experienced about 10 min after sunset on the Earth. The color of the sky and the scene on Titan is mainly orange due to the much greater attenuation of blue light by Titan's haze relative to red light. The Sun (which was comparatively high in the sky when Huygens landed) would be visible as a small, bright spot, ten times smaller than the solar disk seen from Earth, comparable in size and brightness to a car headlight seen from about 150 meters away. It casts sharp shadows, but of low contrast, because some 90% of the illumination comes from the sky. [9]

Detailed Huygens activity timeline

  • Huygens separated from Cassini orbiter at 02:00 UTC on December 25, 2004 in Spacecraft Event Time.
  • Huygens entered Titan's atmosphere at 10:13 UTC on January 14, 2005 in SCET, according to ESA.
  • The probe landed on the surface of the moon at about 10.2°S, 192.4°W around 12:43 UTC in SCET (2 hours 30 minutes after atmospheric entry).(1.)

There was a transit of the Earth and Moon across the Sun as seen from Saturn/Titan just hours before the landing. Huygens entered the upper layer of Titan's atmosphere 2.7 hours after the end of the transit of the Earth, or only one or two minutes after the end of the transit of the Moon. However, the transit did not interfere with the Cassini orbiter or Huygens probe, for two reasons. First, although they could not receive any signal from Earth because it was in front of the Sun, Earth could still listen to them. Second, Huygens did not send any readable data to the Earth; it transmitted data to the Cassini orbiter, which relayed the data received to the Earth later. For details about transits of the Earth as seen from Saturn, see also Transit of Earth from Saturn.

See also Detailed timeline of Huygens mission.

Instrumentation

Huygens had six complex instruments aboard that took in a wide range of scientific data after the probe descended into Titan's atmosphere. The six instruments are:

Huygens Atmospheric Structure Instrument (HASI)

This instrument contains a suite of sensors that measured the physical and electrical properties of Titan's atmosphere. Accelerometers measured forces in all three axes as the probe descended through the atmosphere. With the aerodynamic properties of the probe already known, it was possible to determine the density of Titan's atmosphere and to detect wind gusts. The probe was designed so that in the event of a landing on a liquid surface, its motion due to waves would also have been measurable. Temperature and pressure sensors measured the thermal properties of the atmosphere. The Permittivity and Electromagnetic Wave Analyzer component measured the electron and ion (i.e., positively charged particle) conductivities of the atmosphere and searched for electromagnetic wave activity. On the surface of Titan, the electrical conductivity and permittivity (i.e., the ratio of electric displacement field to its electric field) of the surface material was measured. The HASI subsystem also contains a microphone, which was used to record any acoustic events during probe's descent and landing;[11] this was the first time in history that audible sounds from another planetary body had been recorded.

Doppler Wind Experiment (DWE)

This experiment used an ultra-stable oscillator to improve communication with the probe by giving it a very stable carrier frequency. This instrument was also used to measure the wind speed in Titan's atmosphere by measuring the Doppler shift in the carrier signal. The swinging motion of the probe beneath its parachute due to atmospheric properties may also have been detected. Failure of ground controllers to turn on the receiver in the Cassini orbiter caused the loss of this data. Earth-based radio telescopes were able to reconstruct some of it. Measurements started 150 kilometres above Titan's surface, where Huygens was blown eastwards at more than 400 kilometres per hour, agreeing with earlier measurements of the winds at 200 kilometres altitude, made over the past few years using telescopes. Between 60 and 80 kilometres, Huygens was buffeted by rapidly fluctuating winds, which are thought to be vertical wind shear. At ground level, the Earth-based doppler shift and VLBI measurements show gentle winds of a few metres per second, roughly in line with expectations.

Descent Imager/Spectral Radiometer (DISR)

DISR data visualisation during Huygens' descent

As Huygens was primarily an atmospheric mission, the DISR instrument was optimized to study the radiation balance inside Titan's atmosphere. Its visible and infrared spectrometers and violet photometers measured the up- and downward radiant flux from an altitude of 145 kilometers down to the surface. Solar aureole cameras measured how scattering by aerosols varies the intensity directly around the Sun. Three imagers, sharing the same CCD, periodically imaged a swath of around 30 degrees wide, ranging from almost nadir to just above the horizon. Aided by the slowly spinning probe they would build up a full mosaic of the landing site, which, surprisingly, became clearly visible only below 25 kilometers altitude. All measurements were timed by aid of a shadow bar, which would tell DISR when the Sun had passed through the field of view. Unfortunately, this scheme was upset by the fact that Huygens rotated in a direction opposite to that expected. Just before landing a lamp was switched on to illuminate the surface, which enabled measurements of the surface reflectance at wavelengths which are completely blocked out by atmospheric methane absorption.

DISR was developed at the Lunar and Planetary Laboratory at the University of Arizona under the direction of Martin Tomasko, with several European institutes contributing to the hardware. "The scientific objectives of the experiment fall into four areas including (1) measurement of the solar heating profile for studies of the thermal balance of Titan; (2) imaging and spectral reflection measurements of the surface for studies of the composition, topography, and physical processes which form the surface as well as for direct measurements of the wind profile during the descent; (3) measurements of the brightness and degree of linear polarization of scattered sunlight including the solar aureole together with measurements of the extinction optical depth of the aerosols as a function of wavelength and altitude to study the size, shape, vertical distribution, optical properties, sources and sinks of aerosols in Titan’s atmosphere; and (4) measurements of the spectrum of downward solar flux to study the composition of the atmosphere, especially the mixing ratio profile of methane throughout the descent."[12]

Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer (GC/MS)

A worker in the Payload Hazardous Servicing Facility (PHSF) stands behind the bottom side of the experiment platform for Huygens.

This instrument is a versatile gas chemical analyzer that was designed to identify and measure chemicals in Titan's atmosphere.[13] It was equipped with samplers that were filled at high altitude for analysis. The mass spectrometer, a high-voltage quadrupole, collected data to build a model of the molecular masses of each gas, and a more powerful separation of molecular and isotopic species was accomplished by the gas chromatograph.[14] During descent, the GC/MS also analyzed pyrolysis products (i.e., samples altered by heating) passed to it from the Aerosol Collector Pyrolyser. Finally, the GC/MS measured the composition of Titan's surface. This investigation was made possible by heating the GC/MS instrument just prior to impact in order to vaporize the surface material upon contact. The GC/MS was developed by the Goddard Space Flight Center and University of Michigan's Space Physics Research Lab.

Aerosol Collector and Pyrolyser (ACP)

The ACP experiment drew in aerosol particles from the atmosphere through filters, then heated the trapped samples in ovens (using the process of pyrolysis) to vaporize volatiles and decompose the complex organic materials. The products were flushed along a pipe to the GC/MS instrument for analysis. Two filters were provided to collect samples at different altitudes.[15] The ACP was developed by a (French) ESA team at the Laboratoire Inter-Universitaire des Systèmes Atmosphériques (LISA).

Surface Science Package (SSP)

The SSP contained a number of sensors designed to determine the physical properties of Titan's surface at the point of impact, whether the surface was solid or liquid.[16] An acoustic sounder, activated during the last 100 meters of the descent, continuously determined the distance to the surface, measuring the rate of descent and the surface roughness (e.g., due to waves). The instrument was designed so that if the surface were liquid, the sounder would measure the speed of sound in the "ocean" and possibly also the subsurface structure (depth). During descent, measurements of the speed of sound gave information on atmospheric composition and temperature, and an accelerometer recorded the deceleration profile at impact, indicating the hardness and structure of the surface. A tilt sensor measured pendulum motion during the descent and was also designed to indicate the probe's attitude after landing and show any motion due to waves. If the surface had been liquid, other sensors would also have measured its density, temperature, thermal conductivity, heat capacity, electrical properties (permittivity and conductivity) and refractive index (using a critical angle refractometer). A penetrometer instrument, that protruded 55 mm past the bottom of the Huygens descent module, was used to create a penetrometer trace as Huygens landed on the surface by measuring the force exerted on the instrument by the surface as the instrument broke though the surface and was pushed down into the planet by the force of the probe landing itself. The trace shows this force as a function of time over a period of about 400 ms. The trace has an initial spike which suggests that the instrument hit one of the icy pebbles on the surface photographed by the DISR camera.

The Huygens SSP was developed by the Space Sciences Department of the University of Kent and the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Space Science Department under the direction of Professor John Zarnecki. The SSP research and responsibility transferred to the Open University when John Zarnecki transferred in 2000.

Spacecraft design

Application of multi-layer insulation shimmers under bright lighting during final assembly. The gold colour of the MLI is due to light reflecting from the aluminium coating on the back of sheets of amber coloured Kapton.

Huygens was built under the Prime Contractorship of Aérospatiale in its Cannes Mandelieu Space Center, France, now part of Thales Alenia Space. The heat shield system was built under the responsibility of Aérospatiale near Bordeaux, now part of EADS SPACE Transportation.

Parachute

Martin-Baker Space Systems was responsible for Huygens' parachute systems and the structural components, mechanisms and pyrotechnics that control the probe's descent onto Titan. IRVIN-GQ was responsible for the definition of the structure of each of Huygens' parachutes. Irvin worked on the probe's descent control sub-system under contract to Martin-Baker Space Systems.

Critical design flaw partially resolved

Long after launch, a few persistent engineers discovered that the communication equipment on Cassini had a potentially fatal design flaw, which would have caused the loss of all data transmitted by Huygens.

Since Huygens was too small to transmit directly to Earth, it was designed to transmit the telemetry data obtained while descending through Titan's atmosphere to Cassini by radio, which would in turn relay it to Earth using its large 4-meter diameter main antenna. Some engineers, most notably ESA ESOC employees Claudio Sollazzo and Boris Smeds, felt uneasy about the fact that, in their opinion, this feature had not been tested before launch under sufficiently realistic conditions. Smeds managed, with some difficulty, to persuade superiors to perform additional tests while Cassini was in flight. In early 2000, he sent simulated telemetry data at varying power and Doppler shift levels from Earth to Cassini. It turned out that Cassini was unable to relay the data correctly.[17]

The reason: under the original flight plan, when Huygens was to descend to Titan, it would have accelerated relative to Cassini, causing the Doppler shift of its signal to vary. Consequently, the hardware of Cassini's receiver was designed to be able to receive over a range of shifted frequencies. However, the firmware failed to take into account that the Doppler shift would have changed not only the carrier frequency, but also the timing of the payload bits, coded by phase-shift keying at 8192 bits per second.[17]

Reprogramming the firmware was impossible, and as a solution the trajectory had to be changed. Huygens detached a month later than originally planned (December 2004 instead of November) and approached Titan in such a way that its transmissions travelled perpendicular to its direction of motion relative to Cassini, greatly reducing the Doppler shift.[17]

The trajectory change overcame the design flaw for the most part, and data transmission succeeded, although the information from one of the two radio channels was lost due to an unrelated error.

The trajectory change was not the only mitigation to the Doppler shift problem, and software patches were uplinked to several instruments on the probe from the ESOC facility in Darmstadt to further reduce the risk of data loss.[citation needed]

Channel A data lost

Huygens was programmed to transmit telemetry and scientific data to the Cassini orbiter for relay to Earth using two redundant S-band radio systems, referred to as Channel A and B, or Chain A and B. Channel A was the sole path for an experiment to measure wind speeds by studying tiny frequency changes caused by Huygens's motion. In one other deliberate departure from full redundancy, pictures from the descent imager were split up, with each channel carrying 350 pictures.

As it turned out, Cassini never listened to channel A because of an operational commanding error. The receiver on the orbiter was never commanded to turn on, according to officials with the European Space Agency. ESA announced that the program error was a mistake on their part, the missing command was part of a software program developed by ESA for the Huygens mission and that it was executed by Cassini as delivered.

The loss of Channel A means only 350 pictures were received instead of the 700 planned. All Doppler radio measurements between Cassini and Huygens were lost as well. Doppler radio measurements of Huygens from Earth were made, though not as accurate as the expected measurements that Cassini would have made; when added to accelerometer sensors on Huygens and VLBI tracking of the position of the Huygens probe from Earth, reasonably accurate wind speed and direction measurements could still be derived.

Landing site

The probe landed on the surface of the moon at 10°12′S 192°24′W / 10.2°S 192.4°W / -10.2; -192.4.

Black ellipse shows approximate landing site on this image taken earlier by Cassini. The bright region to the right is Xanadu Region.

See also

References

Citations

  1. ^ a b "Solstice Mission Overview". NASA. Retrieved January 21, 2013.
  2. ^ "Cassini-Huygens". California Institute of Technology-JPL. Retrieved January 21, 2013.
  3. ^ "Cassini-Huygens Mission Facts". California Institute of Technology-JPL. Retrieved January 21, 2013.
  4. ^ "Cassini-Hugyens Mission". NASA. Retrieved 2013-01-30.
  5. ^ Dyches, Preston (January 14, 2015). "NASA and ESA Celebrate 10 Years Since Titan Landing". NASA. Retrieved January 15, 2015.
  6. ^ "Tropical Methane Lakes on Saturn's Moon Titan". saturntoday.com. 2012. Retrieved June 16, 2012.
  7. ^ Titan probe's pebble 'bash-down', BBC News, April 10, 2005.
  8. ^ New Images from the Huygens Probe: Shorelines and Channels, But an Apparently Dry Surface, Emily Lakdawalla, January 15, 2005, verified March 28, 2005
  9. ^ a b c "Rain, winds and haze during the Huygens probe's descent to Titan's surface". nature.com. 2005. Retrieved January 19, 2015.
  10. ^ Lorenz, Ralph; Sotin, Christophe (2010). "The Moon That Would Be a Planet". Scientific American. 302 (3): 36–43. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0310-36. PMID 20184181.
  11. ^ Fulchignoni, M.; Ferri, F.; Angrilli, F.; Bar-Nun, A.; Barucci, M.A.; Bianchini, G.; Borucki, W.; Coradini, M.; Coustenis, A. (2002). "The Characterisation of Titan's Atmospheric Physical Properties by the Huygens Atmospheric Structure Instrument (Hasi)". Space Science Reviews. 104 (1–4): 395–431. Bibcode:2002SSRv..104..395F. doi:10.1023/A:1023688607077. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |displayauthors= ignored (|display-authors= suggested) (help)
  12. ^ M G Tomasko; D Buchhauser; M Bushroe; L E Dafoe; L R Doose; A Eibl; C Fellows; E M Farlane; G M Prout; M J Pringle. The Descent Imager/Spectral Radiometer (DISR) Experiment on the Huygens Entry Probe of Titan. Space Science Reviews, 104, no. 1/2, (2002): 467-549.
  13. ^ Niemann, H.B.; Atreya, S.K.; Bauer, S.J.; Biemann, K.; Block, B.; Carignan, G.R.; Donahue, T.M.; Frost, R.L.; Gautier, D. (2002). "The Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer for the Huygens Probe". Space Science Reviews. 104: 553–91. Bibcode:2002SSRv..104..553N. doi:10.1023/A:1023680305259. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |displayauthors= ignored (|display-authors= suggested) (help)
  14. ^ Niemann, H. B.; Atreya, S. K.; Bauer, S. J.; Carignan, G. R.; Demick, J. E.; Frost, R. L.; Gautier, D.; Haberman, J. A.; Harpold, D. N. (2005). "The abundances of constituents of Titan's atmosphere from the GCMS instrument on the Huygens probe". Nature. 438 (7069): 779–84. Bibcode:2005Natur.438..779N. doi:10.1038/nature04122. PMID 16319830. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |displayauthors= ignored (|display-authors= suggested) (help)
  15. ^ Israel, G.; Cabane, M.; Brun, J-F.; Niemann, H.; Way, S.; Riedler, W.; Steller, M.; Raulin, F.; Coscia, D. (2002). "Huygens Probe Aerosol Collector Pyrolyser Experiment". Space Science Reviews. 104 (1–4): 433–68. Bibcode:2002SSRv..104..433I. doi:10.1023/A:1023640723915. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |displayauthors= ignored (|display-authors= suggested) (help)
  16. ^ "SSP: Surface Science Package". ESA Science & Technology. European Space Agency. December 7, 2005. Retrieved August 20, 2012.
  17. ^ a b c Oberg, James (October 4, 2004). "Titan Calling". IEEE Spectrum. (offline as of 2006-10-14, see Internet Archive version)

Bibliography

  • Nature 438, Dec. 2005 - The results analyzed in 9 articles, letters to the editor and related media are available with FREE ACCESS online.