User talk:Al-Andalusi/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Ibrahim B. Syed paper
Al-Andalusi,
I don't see that anyone has claimed that Muslimheritage.org "exhibits a strong pro-Islamic bias" as you noted on the reliable sources noticeboard. I said that specifically about the the Ibrahim B. Syed paper. Have you read the paper? After reading it, do you still think that it is an unbiased piece? The pro-Islamic bias in that piece is not solely in contrast to European bakwardness, but also misleading comparisons between past and present structures, and overbroad claims. link If you need more problem quotes from the paper, I would be happy to provide them and explain them, though I expect they will be evident on reading. Dialectric (talk) 03:30, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- If it was a comment on Syed's paper, then I don't understand why was it brought up in a discussion on Muslimheritage.org ? Al-Andalusi (talk) 00:31, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- The Syed paper was also hosted on muslimheritage.org, and the cite used in several wikipedia articles was to the muslimheritage.org version. Dialectric (talk) 15:35, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Places associated with Muhammad
Category:Places associated with Muhammad, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:54, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Articles for creation/Ka'b Ibn Mama
Hi. You made an Article for creation page, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ka'b Ibn Mama (2010-10-27), but it was never actually submitted for a review.
I have submitted it just now, so you should get feedback soon. Cheers! Chzz ► 16:18, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
{{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ka'b Ibn Mama.
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! 19:03, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Template:Criticism of Islam sidebar has been nominated for merging with Template:Criticism of religion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Thank you
Thank you. Look forward to working with you.Bless sins (talk) 23:14, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Al-Andalusi, and thank you for your contributions!
An article you worked on Al-Mufaddal al-Dabbi, appears to be directly copied from http://www.experiencefestival.com/a/Mufaddaliyat_-_Al-Mufaddel/id/5311831. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.
It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Al-Mufaddal al-Dabbi if necessary. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:50, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Al-Mufaddal al-Dabbi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kufah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Merger
You proposed merger of Principles of Islamic jurisprudence to Usul al-fiqh here.[1] Could you also take a look at Sources of Islamic law. The three articles seem to have very similar topics.Bless sins (talk) 00:33, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Re: Thābit ibn Qurra
Thanks for suggesting this, and sorry for the late reply. I think it's a great idea and I'd be happy to work on it. However, I don't like deadlines (I usually prefer slower/long term editing) and I'm not familiar with the GA/FA process. In any case, I'll go ahead and read the article and see if I can improve it. Salam. Wiqi(55) 10:21, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
An AN/I has been opened about you here
Please participate, hope we can resolve issue once in for all--Misconceptions2 (talk) 20:05, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- My concerns were clearly stated at the time on the talk page (which I started btw). In addition, another editor (Wiqi55) raised another issue regarding the references. So I'm afraid I don't have time for this "he got me banned" drama. Al-Andalusi (talk) 02:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Category:Kalam
Category:Kalam, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:08, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Per WP:BRD, if you feel your edit should stay, please explain why on the article's talk page, instead of hitting 'undo'. WP:BURDEN is satisfied through the wikilinked articles, and there is no requirement that an individual have specific scholarly qualifications in order to write a book on a subject. - SudoGhost 04:52, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- "there is no requirement that an individual have specific scholarly qualifications in order to write a book on a subject."
- Yes there is, it is called "reliability". Read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Al-Andalusi (talk) 04:54, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- "Reliable sources may be published materials with a reliable publication process, authors who are regarded as authoritative in relation to the subject, or both." Note the "or". Stop cherry-picking. Also, see WP:SOURCES. It very clearly states that non-academic sources are acceptable.θvξrmagξ contribs 06:44, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- None of which are fulfilled by Bostom's work. Hence it is unreliable. 14:48, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- "published materials with a reliable publication process" - pretty sure I've shown examples of Washington Times and CBS news favourably reviewing it, two well-known mainstream publications - over on Talk:Jihad. I rest my case. θvξrmagξ contribs 00:57, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
- None of which are fulfilled by Bostom's work. Hence it is unreliable. 14:48, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- "Reliable sources may be published materials with a reliable publication process, authors who are regarded as authoritative in relation to the subject, or both." Note the "or". Stop cherry-picking. Also, see WP:SOURCES. It very clearly states that non-academic sources are acceptable.θvξrmagξ contribs 06:44, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Category:Arabic poets by era
Category:Arabic poets by era, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 19:24, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Help needed
There is an editor looking for help at my talk page (User_talk:Bless_sins#Arabic_discussion_at_Islamic_Golden_Age).Bless sins (talk) 15:31, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
In fact 08:42, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Moon illusion
I have replied to your comment on my user talk page at Talk:Moon illusion. Arc de Ciel (talk) 05:08, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
What would the Arabic translation of Mohamed Mahmoud Buheiri's name be? An editor wants to know (User_talk:Bless_sins#Mohamed_Mahmoud_Buheiri).Bless sins (talk) 20:07, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Discuss as well
I see that you're making changes (and reversions) to the article Dhimmitude, but not joining the discussion. Could you please discuss your reasons for the reverts? Thanks,VR talk 21:52, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jamil ibn Ma'mar
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Jamil ibn Ma'mar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TheChampionMan1234 03:37, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Islam Barnstar
This is an award to recognize your work. Copy and paste the template onto your profile page. Congratulations!
|
The Islamic Barnstar | |
| For your helpful contributions on the subject of Islam, I hereby award you this barnstar on behalf of the Wiki. Asarelah (talk) 03:51, 26 August 2012 (UTC) |
- Thank you! Much appreciated. Al-Andalusi (talk) 20:38, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Warning for Edit Warring
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- 1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- 2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
Don't do this [[2]] Use the talk page to reach consensus. J8079s (talk) 05:03, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
- Following WP:BRD, you weren't supposed to edit the article further after your first controversial edit. Al-Andalusi (talk) 18:22, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
September 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Medicine in the medieval Islamic world, you may be blocked from editing. J8079s (talk) 15:37, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
- What? Al-Andalusi (talk) 02:06, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
- with reference to your assertions at Talk:The Canon of Medicine It is this edit [3] that violates wp:npov and you repeat it here [4]
- The claim "nor Islamic" is dubious as stated in the edit summary; the correct is "many" scholars, not "most" scholars. If every removal of dubious content is a violation of NPOV to you, then so is your removal of content that you don't like from the very same article. In addition, the edits at The Canon of Medicine and Medicine in medieval Islam are unrelated. Oh, and you blanket reverted many other changes for this little thing? Al-Andalusi (talk) 03:48, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
- with reference to your assertions at Talk:The Canon of Medicine It is this edit [3] that violates wp:npov and you repeat it here [4]
Thanks
Your efforts at nurturing less tended-to articles here do not go unnoticed. MezzoMezzo (talk) 07:04, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
al Daraqutni
Hello! I see your page: User:Al-Andalusi/Al-Daraqutni and decided to write to you more about al-Daraqutni for writing article.
His shaykhs:
- Abul-Qasim al-Baghawi
- Yahya ibn Muhammad ibn Sa'id
- Abu Bakr ibn Abu Dawud
- Muhammad ibn Neiruz al-Anmati
- Abu Hamid Muhammad ibn Harun al-Hadrami
- Ali ibn Abdullah ibn Mubashshir al-Wasiti
- Abu Ali Muhammad ibn Ali al-Maliki
- Muhammad ibn al-Qasim ibn Zakariya al-Maharibi
- Abu Umar Muhammad ibn Yusuf ibn Ya'qub al-Qadi
- Abu Bakr ibn Ziyad al-Nishaburi
- al-Hasan ibn Ali al-'Adawi al-Basri
- Yusuf ibn Ya'qub al-Nishaburi
- Abu Bakr Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Adami
- Umar ibn Ahmad ibn Ali al-Dirabi
- Ishaaq ibn Muhammad al-Ziyaat
- Jafar ibn Abu Bakr
- Isma'il ibn al-'Abbas al-Warraq
- al-Husain ibn Isma'il al-Mahamili
- Abu 'Ubayd al-Qasim (his brother)
- Abul-'Abbas ibn 'Uqda
- Muhammad ibn Mukhallad al-'Attar
- Abu Salih Abdurrahman ibn Sa'id al-Isfahani
- Muhammad ibn Ibrahim ibn Hasf
- Jafar ibn Muhammad ibn Ya'qub al-Saydali
- Abu Talib ahmad ibn Nasr al-Hafiz
- al-Husain ibn Yahya ibn 'Ayyash
- Muhammad ibn Sahl ibn al-Fudayl
- Ahmad ibn Abdullah Wakil Abu Sakhrah
For other information abot biography al-Daraqutni see this and this sources.
article in russian language --Esetok (talk) 13:26, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Your kind response needed
Hello, this is another mate on the English Wikipedia. If i'm posting in wrong place then sorry but i'd appreciated your comments. I'm requesting your comments as i feel some false accusation are being made without reliable sources in some Islam related articles that were created by a single editor User:BengaliHindu. Specially, i found this article 2013 Canning riots with lots of bias and false accusations against Muslims where Muslim clerics were murdered yet blames goes to local Muslim people. May be i'm wrong but it may also possible that such articles were created per Islamophobia. I believe Wikipedia should be free from personal feelings or views and articles on sensitive topics need extra care to maintain a NPOV. I'd deeply appreciate your comments and advises. Best Regards, Mrwikidor ←track 16:50, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!
| World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi Al-Andalusi! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editors are welcome! (But being multilingual is not a requirement.) Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 21:33, 29 May 2013 (UTC) |
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/'Abd Allah ibn 'Amr ibn al-'As, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:15, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Al-Fakihi, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:20, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ka'b Ibn Mama, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:02, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission 'Abd Allah ibn 'Amr ibn al-'As
Hello Al-Andalusi. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled 'Abd Allah ibn 'Amr ibn al-'As.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/'Abd Allah ibn 'Amr ibn al-'As}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 天元 Origin of Heaven (link) 01:57, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission Al-Fakihi
Hello Al-Andalusi. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Al-Fakihi.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Al-Fakihi}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:35, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission Ka'b Ibn Mama
Hello Al-Andalusi. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Ka'b Ibn Mama.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ka'b Ibn Mama}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 11:00, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AlanS (talk) 14:38, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
1RR
All articles in the topic space of the Israeli - Palestinian conflict are subject to a 1RR limitation. You have broken WP:1RR on Operation Protective Edge with this revert: [5] and I suggest you undo it. Brad Dyer (talk) 18:32, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
Your recent editing history at Operation Protective Edge shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
The article is under 1RR please revert yourself. Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 16:13, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Al-Andalusi reported by User:Shrike (Result: ). Thank you. Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 16:15, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Notice of WP:ARBPIA
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:23, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
synth
The very first reference and a number of the other references discuss all of those points. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:09, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
|
For giving some great response, some time ago, vis-a-vis attacks on "1001 Inventions" and issue of institution credibility. Santasa99 (talk) 20:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion declined: Al-Zahrawi
Hello Al-Andalusi. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Al-Zahrawi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I'm not sure that the shortened name is the best place for the article to be. The extant article doesn't seem to use the abbreviation in the lead, so I'm not at all clear that this is the right move. Needs a Move discussion first. Sorry. . Thank you. GedUK 12:25, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited As'ad AbuKhalil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al-Akhbar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Category:Arabic texts
Category:Arabic texts, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 02:51, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Warning: edit warring and personal attacks
Please stop edit warring in Jizya and other wiki articles, and making repeated personal attacks / casting aspersions as you have done on Talk:Jizya page. RLoutfy (talk) 13:56, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- Stop making false claims, and work on resolving those failed verifications. Ok? Al-Andalusi (talk) 14:58, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- You admitted making a mistake here in your verification process, and I am willing to work on helping you with the "failed verifications". You can request help or challenge an edit without insulting other wikipedia editors. You must not edit war nor cast aspersions. Edit warring and personal attacks will lead to an admin process, which can get you blocked, and I would rather that we constructively collaborate together. RLoutfy (talk) 16:43, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your thanks!
Thanks for your thanks! :-) --HakimPhilo (talk) 16:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Can you please review my edits on this article?
Hello. Can you please review my edits on this article and suggest ameliorations? Thanks in advance. --CounterTime (talk) 11:13, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Please help in resolving a conflict
Please have a look at the Jizya, the Al-Baqara 256, the Apostasy in Islam articles and the dispute with @RLoutfy. Thanks in advance. --CounterTime (talk) 20:46, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jizya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BRILL. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kanan Makiya, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages British and Iraqi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
January 2016
Your recent editing history at Taharrush gamea shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sammy1339 (talk) 18:37, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
3RR
I'm leaving this on your talk page (more or less a copy of my reply to you on mine), to make sure you see it. The edit warring, especially if you've violated the 3RR policy, is likely to be reported, so please revert yourself. The material is referenced. New material and sources are being added and the writing is being fixed. Your wholesale reverts are undoing all that work. You've also undone a clarification about the name. SarahSV (talk) 00:13, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Al-Andalusi reported by User:Sammy1339 (Result: ). Thank you. Sammy1339 (talk) 00:53, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Edit warring at Taharrush gamea
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
The full report is at WP:AN3#User:Al-Andalusi reported by User:Sammy1339 (Result: Blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:55, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Mass Sexual Assaults
Hi, I notice that you had helped to create the page on Mass sexual assaults. That's a great initiative but please remember that in order to include any event on that page you need to have a reliable source that actually states that it is a "mass sexual assault." Currently there are several things on the page where that is not the case. Please try to fix these and I'll check the page later on.Monopoly31121993 (talk) 17:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
You are invited to discuss a controversial article you edited previously
You are invited to comment on the article "List of expeditions ordered by Muhammad" in the Wikipedia Administrators Notice Board. Your input is highly valued as you edited this article previously.
Click here: Controversial Islamic Article-90% of page wiped out by Muslims, possible bias to comment--Misconceptions2 (talk) 03:33, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions on all pages regarding Muhammad
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Muhammad, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.— MusikAnimal talk 16:37, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Expedition of Hamza ibn 'Abdul-Muttalib, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hijra and Ansar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Rashidun Caliphate and Rashidun
I notice you added {{merge}} to both articles but didn't start a discussion as to why. Also by adding the same merge template to both articles the link to the discussion would link to two different talk pages. See this and this. One should have {{merge to}} and the other {{merge from}}. This would make things clearer for others and would locate the discussion one one page. I have removed them on a temporary basis until you figure out which way they should merge. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:40, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Asking for some input in on going investigation,
Hi there;
I'm asking for some input in an on going investigation concerning alleged sock-puppetry by Misconceptions2, your input would be much valued, regards.
14:55, 4 April 2016 (UTC)CounterTime (talk)
- @CounterTime: Thanks for this. I think you covered pretty much everything that needs to be said. Al-Andalusi (talk) 19:54, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
April 2016
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — MusikAnimal talk 21:54, 11 April 2016 (UTC)