User talk:Barryjjoyce

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Collegiate Rugby Championships[edit]

Hey, thanks for your reply and advice about the 2012 CRC page on my user page. I went ahead and moved it to my talk page. Let's post any further discussion there. I checked around your contributions and noticed that you've done a lot of work about the CRCs. You did a really nice job in creating the Collegiate Rugby Championship page. I've recently given myself a mini-project where I'm trying create/improve the pages on the various CRCs, and make them uniform and inclusive. Would you be interested in collaborating with me on this? Wall Screamer (talk) 06:29, 9 April 2012 (UTC)


Barry, nice work on creating the pools for the 2012 CRC. I've been a little busy, and don't have any experience creating tables on Wikipedia, so good job taking the initiative.

One thing I've noticed that I think we should work on is that the hyperlinks to various team pages are inconsistent across the various CRC pages. For example, on this section of the 2012 CRC page and on its listing on the main CRC page, "Notre Dame" links to Notre Dame Fighting Irish. However, on this section of the 2012 CRC page, "Notre Dame" links to Notre Dame Rugby Football Club. I propose that for the sake of accuracy and consistency, we create a definitive list of links to all CRC teams, linking as close to info on the rugby page as possible. i.e. link to a page on the school rugby team (if it exists), then the rugby section on the school's athletics page (if it exists), the athletics page itself (if it exists), and finally the university page. How about the list on the main CRC page can serve as the reference list, and once we go through and fix it we can modify all the links on the other pages accordingly. Or is there maybe some template that we can create for this? Tell me what you think.

Also, I noticed on the 2010 CRC, you used the same citation multiple times. When doing this, you want to make a ref name for that citation. See Wikipedia:Citation_templates#Using_the_same_footnote_multiple_times for a guide. And don't worry about making the mistake- I just figured it out myself two weeks ago :D. Wall Screamer (talk) 18:50, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Wall Screamer - thanks for the feedback on 2012 CRC page, next I'll probably add an Infobox to the page. I have no idea how to create tables either, so I just copied the tables from the 2011 page, pasted the tables into the 2012 page, and then edited the tables to make them current. I agree completely with your suggestions re improving hyperlinks, so let's work on those. I will also try to work on my citations, which I know is a weak point of mine. Barryjjoyce (talk) 23:56, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

USA[edit]

See here. Libro0 (talk) 20:28, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

SuggestBot[edit]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
James Bevan Trophy
Spain at the Rugby World Cup
El Salvador national rugby union team
Northeast Rugby Union
Marcelo Loffreda
Kevin Swords
Hugh McMeniman
Midwest Rugby Football Union
2005 Rugby World Cup Sevens
Davidson Wildcats
Potomac Athletic Club RFC
London Sevens
The Old English Baron
History of rugby union matches between New Zealand and Wales
Rugby 2004
Renegade Ops
Mikaele Pesamino
Rugby union in American Samoa
USA Rugby South
Cleanup
Comma Johanneum
NCAA Women's Indoor Track and Field Championship
NCAA Women's Golf Championship
Merge
Crowdsourcing
Royal Kituro Rugby Club
UMBC Retrievers
Add Sources
Rugby sevens
California Golden Bears
Saracens F.C.
Wikify
Hong Kong Scottish
Taps
Intercollegiate sports team champions
Expand
2012 Wales rugby union tour of Australia
Lost City (Stargate SG-1)
Culture of the Virgin Islands

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:36, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Uncited refnames[edit]

Barryjjoyce, in this edit do you know which article(s) you took the refnames "b02001", "PEPT3race08", and "PEPT4HL" from? I'm assuming you took the content from the Americans article. Next time you add ref names, please check to see if the article has refs cited with the refnames. If it doesn't, then you need to copy the actual citation info for the first instance of that ref, not just the refname tags. Thanks - M0rphzone (talk) 05:20, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Cleveland[edit]

I'm not sure why some of the information in the Sports in Cleveland section from Cleveland needs to be removed. If anything, that's the minimum and could be used as a starting point for a much larger expansion for Sports in Cleveland. For example, the sentences about Cleveland State should remain in the Cleveland article, and then the Sports in Cleveland article could provide a section of coverage about Cleveland State sports. However, I do agree that other parts could be trimmed. In addition, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Splitting, in case you weren't already aware. Best, SpencerT♦C 09:27, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

I actually think this was a good idea. The sports scene in in Cleveland has almost a life of it's own, and having it's own article is is something I wished I had thought of doing...nice job. Vjmlhds (talk) 13:39, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Awards[edit]

This editor is a Yeoman Editor and is entitled to display this Service Badge.

given to Barryjjoyce for creating the article Sports in Cleveland.

Vjmlhds (talk) 04:24, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of United States national rugby union team player statistics[edit]

Hello, Barryjjoyce. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, United States national rugby union team player statistics, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:19, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Hope Solo[edit]

Please desist from further edit warring on the above article and discuss your issues on the article's talk page. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:03, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Minneapolis[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Barryjjoyce. You have new messages at Talk:Minneapolis#Sports_in_the_metro_area.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Houston[edit]

Hi. I was working on a major restructuring of the Houston article, in order to make it consistent with the Wikiproject City guidelines. As I was working on it, you made two edits, which I might have reverted when I made my change (they were in architecture). My apologies. Please check and see if your edits are still there. Onel5969 (talk) 00:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Re: City limits[edit]

Thank you. I'd not seen that discussion and it does clarify the issue. -SusanLesch (talk) 17:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Chivas expansion edit[edit]

Hi, saw that you reverted my edit in the MLS expansion article. I think you're referring to my edit here. I deleted the section because, like you point out, it didn't make sense to have a section about a sale in an expansion article, but I think a similar content in the Chivas/RSL section makes sense as a way to show the result of the expansion. Basically, same content, different intent and context. Mosmof (talk) 03:11, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

@Mosmof: Thanks for bringing the discussion to the talk page. Let me start by saying you've been doing great work on the MLS Expansion article. But this article is not about MLS ownership changes. There have been many ownership changes over the years, and they are not reported in the Expansion article, nor should they be. If you want to write about MLS ownership changes, the best place may be here or here. Barryjjoyce (talk) 03:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the response. Though the point wasn't so much that the ownership changed, but that the parties involved acknowledged that the expansion failed and needed a reboot. I think it's worth mentioning how an expansion franchise turned out, especially in a unique case like the Chivas where the league felt compelled to take over rather than wait for a buyer to emerge, just like we have a subsection for the two Florida teams that were dissolved. Mosmof (talk) 13:28, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Actually, the Chivas situation is not unique. There have been several other times in MLS history when the league has owned a team, but those episodes are not discussed in this article. As I mentioned last time, there are other MLS related articles where ownership changes are discussed, so you should feel free to add the material there. Barryjjoyce (talk) 01:31, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Unless I'm missing something, it's the only case a team went from an outside owner to league ownership (San Jose Clash started as a league-owned team before AEG took over). And it's one of just two expansion team that "failed" (i.e. the owner stepped down/removed before a buyer could be found). Mosmof (talk) 19:31, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm still opposed to your adding the discussion of an ownership change to the Expansion article, for the reasons already stated above. An ownership change is quite different from a league contraction. Barryjjoyce (talk) 02:02, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Heineken Cup[edit]

Barry, with regard to your recent edit to Heineken Cup. I am not sure how relevant Players in bold are still active. is, but you have made some errors. Peter Stringer, for example, is still playing (for Bristol, just renewed for another season http://www.planetrugby.com/story/0,25883,16024_9219863,00.html). I am sure there are more errors. Hamish59 (talk) 19:31, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

I see that you have fixed Peter Stringer. Thank you. Do you want to check the rest of them as well? Hamish59 (talk) 10:34, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of the Mexico national football team may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:38, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Major League Lacrosse
added a link pointing to Columbus metropolitan area
United States at the FIFA World Cup
added a link pointing to World Cup

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Major League Soccer GAN[edit]

Hi Barryjjoyce! I was going to take a look at this article for its GA review, however on a quick pass I am seeing numerous paragraphs that are mostly or completely unsourced. Ordinarily, this would result in a quick fail of the review. However, given the size of the backlog and the fact that it has waited in the queue for four months, I wanted to give you a chance to take a pass over this article and bring the sourcing up to snuff before doing so. If you feel you will not have the time to handle this within the next few days, then I will fail the nomination with a promise to do a fast GA review on a future nomination of this article when you do have time. Thanks, Resolute 23:33, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

I should add also that a once-over on the prose looks like it might be beneficial as well. There are a lot of one-sentence paragraphs, and a couple spots that appear to be written in proseline, which could be improved. Resolute 23:37, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Looking better, but there are still several paragraphs that end without citations. (i.e.: Four of the seven paragraphs in the "Establishment" section end with uncited statements, three under "Stadiums" and others sprinkled throughout). That said, the overall look appears sufficient for a full GA review. I likely won't have the time to sit down and read this article in detail today, but will try to do so tomorrow. In the meantime, it would be helpful if those remaining uncited statements are fixed up. Thanks, Resolute 14:33, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Most statements require citations regardless of where they appear in the prose. It isn't that all paragraphs must end with citations so much as I felt that WP:V required that most of those statements required citations. Regardless, I am going to start the full review now. It won't be completed today, but I will get some feedback for you. Thanks, Resolute 22:54, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Sounds good! I will look to complete the review later today. Thanks! Resolute 13:13, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Major League Soccer[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Major League Soccer you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Resolute -- Resolute (talk) 23:40, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Major League Soccer[edit]

The article Major League Soccer you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Major League Soccer for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Resolute -- Resolute (talk) 00:42, 23 August 2014 (UTC)