User talk:Graffitinucular

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Graffitinucular, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of street artists may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [http://alexmartinezink.com/ Alex Martinez]|Eressos]][https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001213515369&sk=photos&collection_token=100001213515369%
  • http://www.dangriffiths.com/2006/08/02/alex-martinez-shot-for-the-evening-standard/ Alex Martinez] ([http://www.questia.com/library/1G1-148986678/the-man-who-s-painting-portobello-alex-martinez-has

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:19, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of street artists has been reverted.
Your edit here to List of street artists was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://publishing.yudu.com/Freedom/Abu1b/ArtistPortfolioAlexa/resources/index.htm?referrerUrl=http://www.yudu.com/item/details/2492/Artist-Portfolio-Alexander-Martinez) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit when you feel they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! Graffitinucular, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Graffitinucular. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 08:53, 21 January 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

It would be a greater help if you could tell me how to create a page like this one. Above

cheers


Graffitinucular (talk) 10:17, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

oops, this wiki link Above (artist)

Start by reading the advice you've already been given, particularly WP:Your first article and WP:Referencing for beginners. If you keep resubmitting without reading those and taking note of what they say, you'll be wasting your own time and that of the reviewers. There are a number of other useful links in the welcome message at the top of this page, so please take the time to read them. --David Biddulph (talk) 11:44, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Graffitinucular. You have new messages at Josve05a's talk page.
Message added 18:55, 24 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

(tJosve05a (c) 18:55, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Graffitinucular. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ColinFine (talk) 21:49, 27 January 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

A Tesla Roadster for you![edit]

A Tesla Roadster for you!
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 (talk) 13:09, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Graffitinucular. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui  13:20, 5 February 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

I've made some changes to your draft, to the extent that it should pass if you resubmit it again. You can always undo the changes by going into the page history and reverting to an earlier version; I won't mind. Yunshui  14:08, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant! May the gods always smile on you good Sir. And only one typo. lol x for a z at the end of his surname. I'll resubmit now. Thank You Graffitinucular (talk) 14:15, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sure they would, if I didn't vehemently deny their existence... . No problem, hope it gets re-reviewed soon. Yunshux  14:21, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Graffitinucular. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Vanjagenije (talk) 21:56, 7 February 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Graffitinucular. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Vanjagenije (talk) 22:26, 7 February 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at AfC Alex Martinez (graffiti artist) was accepted[edit]

Alex Martinez (graffiti artist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Thanks!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 22:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Roger 78.149.175.239 (talk) 22:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Alex Martinez, Graffiti Artist was accepted[edit]

Alex Martinez, Graffiti Artist, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Thanks!

Theroadislong (talk) 22:39, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Theroadislong 78.149.175.239 (talk) 22:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New article[edit]

Good job on the Martinez article, looks great. Grayfell (talk) 23:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you. Everyone has been very helpful and patient. Cheers Graffitinucular (talk) 23:11, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded; nice work for a first article. Thanks for bearing with the process; I realise it must have been pretty frustrating waiting for reviewers. Since you've now got an idea of what creating an article entails, might I suggest that for your next one, you try creating it directly in the Draft namespace or in your sandbox, and then moving it yourself (your account is now autoconfirmed, so you'll be able to do so) - that way you won't have to go through the AFC process again. If you'd like someone to give it a once-over before publication again, I'd be happy to oblige. All the best, Yunshui  11:06, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Graffitinucular. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]