User talk:Mumbaifreaks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Mumbaifreaks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:11, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Lucknow. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Biker Biker (talk) 18:31, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Faizabad. Tgeairn (talk) 07:46, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lindsay lohan in h'wood.jpg[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as File:Lindsay lohan in h'wood.jpg, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NtheP (talk) 11:51, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

31 hour common vandalism block - please do not post hoaxes again.LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:52, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Uttar Pradesh, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 16:07, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Uttar Pradesh. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Joyson Prabhu Holla at me! 16:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

C. H. M. College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to English, Marathi, I.T. and Patni

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Ek ruka hua faisla.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ek ruka hua faisla.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:11, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo
Hello! Mumbaifreaks, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 19:39, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I hope this was a mistake[edit]

I'll assume good faith, hoping that this edit, in which you wiped out large portions of an editor's talk page, was a mistake. Please be more careful in the future! Favonian (talk) 12:05, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Uttar Pradesh, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ÐℬigXЯaɣ 13:03, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback[edit]

Can I suggest you practice on the Sandbox until you get the hang of things? To add an image, see the instructions below:

For uploading pictures and other media, it's easiest to go to Wikimedia Commons (you can use your Wikipedia credentials if you're not logged in already) and visit the Upload Wizard. Wikimedia Commons can only accept files which anyone can use for any purpose. That means most content you find on the web is not acceptable. But for example, most photos that you've taken yourself are OK to upload.

Here's a screenshot of the Upload Wizard:

You start by selecting the files you want to upload, then you go step by step through the process. In the final step, you'll get some wiki markup that you can copy into a Wikipedia article. Let me know if I can help. :-)

πr2 (t • c) 16:24, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Mumbaifreaks. You have new messages at Yasht101's talk page.
Message added 16:12, 27 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Yasht101 16:12, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Mumbaifreaks. You have new messages at Yasht101's talk page.
Message added 13:38, 5 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Yasht101 13:38, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Mumbaifreaks. You have new messages at Yasht101's talk page.
Message added 14:03, 5 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Yasht101 14:03, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright problems with File:A stunning diva.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:A stunning diva.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://idiva.com/news-entertainment/no-one-killed-divya-bharti/10658. As a copyright violation, File:A stunning diva.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:A stunning diva.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 16:01, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Mumbaifreaks. You have new messages at Vensatry's talk page.
Message added 08:37, 9 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—Vensatry (Ping me) 08:37, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GAN[edit]

Please do not nominate articles for GA that you are not among the top contributors of. Aishwarya Rai has already failed GAN twice by being nominated before it was ready. This looks bad on the project. Om Shanti Om is likewise not ready yet. There will be a lot of fixing and additions needed to get them to pass. It would be better if you would try to improve the articles first, and ask on the talk page if its ready for nomination. BollyJeff || talk 19:53, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just to add a little more on it, don't just simply GA nominate any article where you haven't contributed much. Also consult with other editors. —Vensatry (Ping me) 03:28, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Emily Addison[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Emily Addison, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Best regards, Cindy(talk to me) 23:09, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Emily Addison[edit]

A tag has been placed on Emily Addison requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 01:58, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Om Shanti Om[edit]

Hello. I have left my comments on the review page of Om Shanti Om. Kindly take a look and have your say. Smarojit (talk) 05:59, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Mumbaifreaks. You have new messages at Bollyjeff's talk page.
Message added 18:55, 12 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

§§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 18:55, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Brooke Belle[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Brooke Belle, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.brookebelleblog.net/brooke-belle-bio/. As a copyright violation, Brooke Belle appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Brooke Belle has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Brooke Belle and send an email with the message to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Brooke Belle with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Brooke Belle.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:26, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Anissa Kate[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Anissa Kate, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.anissakateblog.com/anissa-kate-bio/. As a copyright violation, Anissa Kate appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Anissa Kate has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Anissa Kate and send an email with the message to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Anissa Kate with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Anissa Kate.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:31, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Riley Reid[edit]

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Riley Reid, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the page that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:37, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jazy Berlin[edit]

The article Jazy Berlin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:PORNBIO... Has not won any awards

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 07:09, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for sockpuppetry, avoiding scrutiny and using other accounts to continue the copyvio and other disruption from your main account. Read our policies and contribute constructively once your block expires.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —SpacemanSpiff 21:23, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Riley Reid for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Riley Reid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riley Reid until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Proposed deletion of Ariella Ferrera[edit]

The article Ariella Ferrera has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails PORNBIO, only nom is scene-related, no reliably sourced biographical content

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 12:24, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samsung galaxy10.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Samsung galaxy10.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mumbaifreaks&oldid=1189978406"