User talk:Surajt88/Archive 7
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:05, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 July 2011
- News and notes: Picture of the Year 2010; data challenge; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Star-Spangled WikiProject
- Featured content: Two newly promoted portals
- Arbitration report: Arb resigns while mailing list leaks continue; Motion re: admin
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:05, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 July 2011
- From the editor: Stepping down
- Higher education summit: Wikipedia in Higher Education Summit recap
- In the news: Britannica and Wikipedia compared; Putin award criticized; possible journalistic sockpuppeting
- WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Albums
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tree shaping case comes to a close
- Technology report: WMF works on its release strategy; secure server problems
Puzzled by your reversion
Hi. I'm really puzzled and hurt by your reversion of my contributions to David Meerman Scott. Can you elaborate? Maybe the TW bot made a mistake? (I'm watching this page so you can reply here.) Woz2 (talk) 11:21, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hello Woz2. I am really sorry if I hurt u, which you can be assured I dint mean to. The first thing that struck me was the title of the subsection. Next, blogs and social network websites cannot be trusted as reliable sources for information added to Wikipedia (see: Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Hence, at first glance, they appeared as vandalism and I thought it was best to remove the content till the editor finds more reliable sources.Suraj T 11:34, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- I have undone your last revision to David Meerman Scott as I could not establish the reliability of the sources.Suraj T 11:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Please assume good faith and not accuse your fellow editors of vandalism lightly. The blog refs are known to me to be accurate but I've removed them in any case in an over abundance of caution. Hope it's OK now. Woz2 (talk) 12:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry if my tone made you feel I was accusing you. But still you have twitter.com, which is a social networking site, as a reference. And snappytv.com is not a reliable source for information. Even if you know the facts to be true, the information must be verifiable (see: Wikipedia:Verifiability). I think it will be best to discuss this here. Cheers. Suraj T 12:44, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- OK I commented there. BTW, maybe you're not aware of this but when you use TW as you did, the message I see in the history is "(Reverted 6 edits by Woz2 (talk) identified as vandalism to last revision by Nick Number. (TW)) (undo)" . I don't use Twinkle, but I think you can/should set it to say "Revert good faith edits..." instead. Woz2 (talk) 14:14, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hello Woz2. What it says is in the history of the article. All that can be done is to revert what I have done. And you have undone my edit yourself. Please remember that what I did was in the interest of the article and I have nothing personal against you. And I expect you to act with the same intentions. Cheers. Suraj T 04:51, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
FYI
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-FASTILY (TALK) 18:51, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Thanks for the brownie. Please keep up your diligent editing.
Woz2 (talk) 11:38, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:51, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 July 2011
- In the news: Fine art; surreptitious sanitation; the politics of kyriarchic marginalization; brief news
- WikiProject report: Earn $$$ free pharm4cy WORK FROM HOME replica watches ViAgRa!!!
- Featured content: Historic last launch of the Space Shuttle Endeavour; Teddy Roosevelt's threat to behead official; 18th-century London sex manual
- Arbitration report: Motion passed to amend 2008 case: topic ban and reminder
- Technology report: Code Review backlog almost zero; What is: Subversion?; brief news
Your request for rollback
Hi Surajt88. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY (TALK) 22:44, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Category:Renewable energy
Per Wikipedia:Categorization please stop adding parent category Category:Renewable energy to the all articles about photovoltaic power stations. --Jklamo (talk) 11:48, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:43, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 July 2011
- Wikimedian in Residence interview: Wikimedian in Residence on Open Science: an interview with Daniel Mietchen
- Recent research: Talk page interactions; Wikipedia at the Open Knowledge Conference; Summer of Research
- WikiProject report: Musing with WikiProject Philosophy
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case opened; hyphens and dashes update; motion
- Technology report: Protocol-relative URLs; GSoC updates; bad news for SMW fans; brief news
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| For your excellent articles on photovoltaics. Thank you! Gurt Posh (talk) 12:57, 26 July 2011 (UTC) |
Thanks Gurt Posh..:-) Suraj T 04:03, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
| This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |