User talk:TimR

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them:

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Tip: you can sign your name with ~~~~

Noldoaran 02:48, Nov 25, 2003 (UTC)


Welcome![edit]

Hello TimR! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —Vanderdeckenξφ 15:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

A few more resources to supplement the ones above - policy is really worth knowing. —Vanderdeckenξφ 15:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please create a user page[edit]

Please create a user page at User:TimR. I could create it myself, but I prefer not to touch other people's user pages. Because of the existence of subpages such as User:TimR/Tables, it's just odd to not have an uplink. — Randall Bart 01:01, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point - now done. Thanks. :-) TimR 07:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sortkeys[edit]

I started a discussion at Template talk:Sortablename, since there seem to be a number of unconnected efforts to create sortkeys for sortable wikitables. ~ trialsanderrors 23:20, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting - thanks. I'll have a good look at that. TimR 07:11, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for working on this excellent utility: sorting by surname was exactly what I was looking for. In the spirit of Burns Night, lang may yir lum reek! --NigelG (or Ndsg) | Talk 17:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:TheMemoirsOfSherlockHolmes-BBCAdaptation-TheFinalProblem-Extract.ogg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:TheMemoirsOfSherlockHolmes-BBCAdaptation-TheFinalProblem-Extract.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 22:59, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In this article you added the information that the clock is constantly one hour ahead of GMT. Is this true? Emeraude 16:16, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was told this some years ago by an London local history specialist as the explanation for the rather cryptic rhyme - I have to say that I am not sure whether it is still true (or indeed ever was) but I will try to check it out next time I am in London outside British Summer Time. TimR 16:32, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Tobin references[edit]

When I viewed the page last, the references had disappeared entirely along with the categories, after (and presumably somehow as a result of) your edit. I didn't have the time just then to figure out why, hence the revert. Katharineamy (talk) 20:48, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Template:X4 worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Elenseel (talk) 17:39, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ThinkTheUnthinkableCast.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:ThinkTheUnthinkableCast.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:LordOfTheRingsBBCRadioAdaptation1981Cover.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:LordOfTheRingsBBCRadioAdaptation1981Cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:15, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About your recent edit..[edit]

On this edit, please see Wikipedia:Spelling on how to "spell check" correctly, because the way you are doing it is just.... woah. Thanks. -66.51.147.57 —Preceding comment was added at 00:11, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another chart that won't work[edit]

Would you be willing to help me with another chart that is just not working? The lines are not going where they should, and I can't figure out why it isn't working. Thanks in advance. - LA @ 21:04, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delighted to be able to help. Don't forget that a box (with text in it) has a width of 'three' compared to a line segment, with a width of 'one' which is why lines can seem to be too short (see the boxes section under the parameters paragraph. Also don't be afraid to experiment: I guess where things go, and then decide from looking whether a line should be a little longer or shorter and then just put more tiles into the appropriate line of the template. Eventually after many trials and previews, I get something I'm reasonably happy with.... :-) Feel free to shout for further help. TimR (talk) 21:51, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just need an opinion[edit]

Tim...would you give me your opinion of a chart that I have made? It is here. I just need an opinion, since it is working well since you pointed out what I missed when reading the usage. - LA @ 06:00, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it's taken me a while to get back to you about this. I'm really impressed with the chart. It's huge and you've put a lot of effort into it! If you're after any suggestions for changes or improvements, I have nothing to add: you've done an excellent job there. :-) TimR (talk) 09:48, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:HamishAndDougalCover.gif)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:HamishAndDougalCover.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 13:08, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AfterHenrySimonBrettNovelCover.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:AfterHenrySimonBrettNovelCover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 13:09, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nob, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mayalld (talk) 09:39, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sortable wikitable[edit]

when i sort on User:TimR/Tables the last table, the dates in the left column don't sort properly. do they work for you? --Rajah (talk) 02:19, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ok, my bad. i see now you are using a custom javascript for that. my apologies. --Rajah (talk) 02:20, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: DID castaway choices[edit]

Always nice to know one's efforts are appreciated - ta! Cavie78 (talk) 10:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wine and Viticulture templates[edit]

Very nifty! :) AgneCheese/Wine 03:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! Thanks... Pmrich (talk) 11:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please check out refinements of Template:Viticulture. Your input is appreciated. Also, what do you think of change in category? It does not make sense to me. Pmrich (talk) 11:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spider-Man[edit]

Hello. :) Since you have been involved in editing the article Spider-Man, I wanted to let you know that we have nominated the article for "Good Article" status. You can view the review page, and if there is anything you can do to make the article better, please do so. :) There are a number of concerns to be addressed and some work to be done, so pitch in if you are able, make any suggestions that you think might be helpful, or at least just be there for moral support. :) BOZ (talk) 01:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Someone has mucked about extensively with the Radio Show Infobox template and removed the caption capability. Can you rescue the situation? Thanks. Softlavender (talk) 20:19, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pointer. Certainly. I can't do it right now, but I'll have a look in the next day or two to try to see what's going on. TimR (talk) 23:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind, I notified the editor involved and he fixed it. It's all fine now! Not fully fixed yet, although I've renotified the editor involved. Softlavender (talk) 02:29, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grape Variety Capitalisation[edit]

Hi, Your article on grape variety caps is mostly correct BUT it misses a further point, which is that there is a further breakdown below cultivar(!). So while Vitis vinifera ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ is correct, Sauvignon blanc is fully Vitis vinifera ‘Sauvignon’ blanc. These are mostly for the cultivars with differing coloured grapes, although their may be other examples, hence Cabernet Franc is all caps, but Pinot noir and Pinot gris are not.--Limegreen (talk) 11:10, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I saw your message on Jerem43's talk page about this template. I don't know of any specific examples off the top of my head, but I understand the problem, because it's come up several times since 2006, back when I started editing related articles. Sadly, on average, once you pull the basic information about a drink into an infobox, the remainder of the article is frequently quite short, sometimes a stub, sometimes just a bit longer. Either way, when someone views a very short article and over half the page is templates (the infobox and the Alcoholic beverages template, plus maybe others), it really overwhelms the article and makes it appear insignificant. Such articles tend to get flagged for deletion. However, articles like that in the past have been dramatically expanded and improved well beyond the stub threshold. Large templates do not help in that case. Furthermore, once a person has seen the template the first time, they really don't need to see the whole thing over and over again. It might be nice to use a cookie or something to track if a person has viewed the template, or better yet, track the hidden/shown choice, but we can't. The compromise then is to keep large navigation templates like Alcoholic beverages collapsed (hidden) until the user expands them deliberately. I hope that clarifies things for you, but if not, you can ask me again (or Jerem43, who is actually much more active currently in dealing with the templates for these WikiProjects). Have a good weekend! —Willscrlt “Talk” ) 12:44, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox wine grape variety[edit]

Hello Tim, I just realised that you created Template:Infobox wine grape variety several months ago, and that this template is another template than Template:Infobox grape variety which has existed since 2007. The latter template is the one linked to by the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wine project page. I just posted my take on your template on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wine#Duplicate infoboxes, or Did I fall asleep?. Tomas e (talk) 17:31, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cite archers episode[edit]

Template:Cite archers episode has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 16:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:53, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Audio Drama Wiki[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you are involved in the Wikipedia Radio project, and I wanted to invite you to participate with a new wiki project specifically about radio drama: the Audio Drama Wiki. I've been an Wikipedia editor for a while now, but there is a lot of information that would be very useful to have about the medium that doesn't fall within Wikipedia's parameters. Hence, a new wiki. You are welcome to join us if you are interested. Justinkrivers (talk) 01:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite EU regulation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 16:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:TheHudsonAndPepperdineShow-Series1Episode1Extract.ogg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TheHudsonAndPepperdineShow-Series1Episode1Extract.ogg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:38, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adding chart tiles[edit]

Hi Tim,

Thanks for making Template:Chart happen. I use it a lot!

The way the code works is completely over my head, so I wanted to ask you - how technically feasible is the prospect of adding new tile types? It would be useful to have tiles that look like -|- (that is to say, a horizontal line with a small gap through which a vertical line passes) and the same thing but rotated through 90° (it's hard to draw an example with ASCII art). They could be used for clearer indications of lines that have to cross over each other in complicated trees. Would I be able to ask you to do that if it isn't crazy difficult? If it is, please feel free to decline.

Cheers, — Hex (❝?!❞) 19:04, 14 October 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carpaccio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minced meat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox wine grape variety has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:17, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, TimR. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, TimR. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, TimR. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]