Jump to content

User talk:Rich Farmbrough: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Use dmy: clarification needed
Line 384: Line 384:
:::Sure why not? The bot will then do nothing, but that's what it's doing now. Consider it done for version p615. ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', <small>10:57, 4 October 2011 (UTC).</small><br />
:::Sure why not? The bot will then do nothing, but that's what it's doing now. Consider it done for version p615. ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', <small>10:57, 4 October 2011 (UTC).</small><br />
::::I did see your response a while ago but have been waiting for a clarification because I am not sure about your stance on the issues raised. It is a unfortunate that one has to use a block to force you to make your bot work correctly, but that seems to be the case. Please could you confirm, without any possibility of doubt, that you have enabled a waiting period ([[User talk:Rich Farmbrough/Archive/2011Oct#Please make helpful pixie a little less eager to be helpful|as discussed]]) and that your bot will no longer contravene your editing restrictions. &mdash;&nbsp;Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 19:35, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
::::I did see your response a while ago but have been waiting for a clarification because I am not sure about your stance on the issues raised. It is a unfortunate that one has to use a block to force you to make your bot work correctly, but that seems to be the case. Please could you confirm, without any possibility of doubt, that you have enabled a waiting period ([[User talk:Rich Farmbrough/Archive/2011Oct#Please make helpful pixie a little less eager to be helpful|as discussed]]) and that your bot will no longer contravene your editing restrictions. &mdash;&nbsp;Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 19:35, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
:::::Yes I have increased the waiting period to 1 hour. ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', <small>19:59, 8 October 2011 (UTC).</small><br />


==''The Signpost'': 26 September 2011==
==''The Signpost'': 26 September 2011==

Revision as of 19:59, 8 October 2011

Template:Mirror me

  • This page has been viewed 383949 times. Plus one when I wrote this, plus you looking at it now.
Femto's Box
Th 3
Ed 5
Ms 7
Links
FAQ
Talk Archive Index
follow my blog

Another error

Forbidden

You don't have permission to access /w/index.php on this server. Apache/2.2.9 (Debian) mod_ssl/2.2.9 OpenSSL/0.9.8o mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.10.1 Server at en.wikipedia.org Port 80

Minor issues

Todo

I like what you did with this report on the stub templates. Can it be updated? Can a similar report be run for the Categories? Finally, could these be automatically set to update, say, once a month? or even once a quarter? Dawynn (talk) 20:30, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's pretty much what I planned, if they are going to be maintained. However it looked like there were other lists doing a similar job that had not been attended to for a significant period of time. Rich Farmbrough, 17:49, 8 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Note there is a report for "Uncategorized Stub types" too [[3]]. Rich Farmbrough, 05:24, 9 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

todo

Revive Wildbot?

A few folks would love to see someone revive and/or take over Wildbot. You've been mentioned a couple times: [4] [5] Up for it? --W☯W t/c 20:25, 15 December 2010 (UTC) todo[reply]

Scotland (continued)

Hi. Thanks for that, I've sorted out Indonesian links. Now Scotland. Can you do the same thing with the maps in Category:Populated places in Inverness committee area and Category:Populated places in Sutherland? Once that's done I'll add the infoboxes to the remainder.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:22, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did I do this? I think so...Rich Farmbrough, 23:41, 29 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]

--

Wikilove guest post?

Dear Rich,

I am starting a blog about wikilove and the wiki nature. Not necessarily mediawiki or wikipedia, but with guest posts from wikipedians and others who clearly get and are inspired by it. (one of my favorite personal examples is someone who went around tagging everything with 2d barcodes that linked to a webpage where he would write about it... during the initial surge of enthusiasm about cellphone barcode-readers)

Would you be willing to write a guest post about something that has inspired you recently? It would be extra cool to have an additional post about things that inspire your bots ;-) I like to think of them holding secret meetings on the small language wikis, protected from rc patrollers by their bot flags...

Regards, SJ+ 19:38, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not feeling the Wikilove right now.... but I'll keep this in mind nonetheless. Rich Farmbrough, 17:54, 9 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

SmackBot Source?

Dear Rich, I’d like to set up a scheme similar to Category:Wikipedia maintenance categories sorted by month at de.wikipedia, and I’ve gathered support for doing so[6]. Would you be ready to hand out the source of the sections of SmackBot that perform this task? I’ve read it is implemented in Perl and you think about moving to PyWikipediaBot. I’d also appreciate Python rather than Perl, and maybe – without making any promises yet – I might set up a similar Python bot you might use later in return – maybe I’d just adapt your code, in either case your source code would be helpful. Thanks & regards --dealerofsalvation 06:35, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'll try to produce a presentable version of the code. Rich Farmbrough, 13:54, 7 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]

todo

Page protection tag

Hi,

I know you've been adding dates to tags so I thought you might be able to help. I see that Brazil has been protected. I thought perhaps it was a long running dispute because I kept coming across it. The tag doesn't say when that was applied and I suspect that we need to date such tags so we can purge old ones.

Can you take a look at the tags on that page and see if we can apply dates to them? Lightmouse (talk) 14:57, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, the bot doesn't have the rights to edit fully protected pages. I'll think on it. Rich Farmbrough, 00:41, 12 June 2011 (UTC).[reply]

todo

Hi Rich,

Was the above template just an aborted experiment? Was going to TfD it as unused and redundant, but not sure if it would be better incorporating it into the Wikibanner system (if that was what it was meant for). Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 15:39, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, well according to me it would be better. The portal template is extremely widely used and has been simplified as far as possible, without splitting this version out. The banner guru MSGJ reverted the use of this in some {{WPBannerMeta}}'s sub-template, on the grounds I forget, and I was so worn out from drama over combining hundreds of portal templates into one (with many claiming that the world would implode, or that we were template fascists, or words to that effect) that I couldn't be bothered with it at the time. I still think it is the right thing, especially as both Portal and WPBannerMeta are so widely used. WPBannerMEta is, of course, insanely complex, and for me at least seems to take a good time to load, it is arguable that the saving from simplifying the task-force buttons is negligible. Nonetheless I still think it is worthwhile for the total package. Rich Farmbrough, 16:02, 14 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]
In that case I'll leave it for now. I agree that {{WPBannerMeta}} is seriously hairy, which is why I've never touched the code IIRC. I know the feeling as regards totally undue drama when it comes to template stuff. Let me know if there's any movement on this. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 21:29, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Rich Farmbrough, 13:01, 15 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]

todo

Your bot breaks pseudocode

Hi! On Sieve of Eratosthenes. If you could advise me what tags to put around it, I'd be much obliged. Right now it has lines starting with blanks, empty lines must have a leading blank to be included. It seems your bot removes leading blanks on otherwise empty lines of text. Thanks! WillNess (talk) 20:45, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) You could put a non-breaking space on the right-hand end of those blank lines, like this:
 
--Redrose64 (talk) 21:24, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Might be worth looking at the bot code too, though. Rich Farmbrough, 22:16, 22 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Thanks a lot guys! Fixing bot would be great, there might be other ppl like me with similar problem. WillNess (talk) 10:24, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

todo

Richard Farmbrough, in regard to this article, I cannot verify the sources:

  • Peralta, Jesus T. "The Butuan palaeograph: ethnographic implications of an ancient script," in Archipelago 6:A-55 (1979): 31-33.
  • Santos, Hector. "Artifacts with writing revisited" in Sulat sa Tansô, 2:5 (June 1995), 1.
  • -----. "Other pre-Hispanic writing artifacts" in Sulat sa Tansô, 2:2 (February 1995), 1.
  • -----. "The Butuan Silver Strip" in Sulat sa Tansô, 2:2 (February 1995), 3.

The last three are circular, in that the online version Sulat sa Tansô is on the same web site as the one linked reference on the article page. I cannot find any academic articles by Santos or Peralta in lexis/nexis, Jstor, Muse, or Google scholar, and only one passing mention of the strip in a hindustan times article that reprints a report from the Asian News International, apparently a wire service, in lexis/nexis. I cannot find a journal named Archipelago that treats this kind of topic. There's a book which google says contains the term, but there are only a few copies in libraries. I'm not sure it is notable, but I thought I'd run the issue by you. --Nuujinn (talk) 11:01, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This sort of stuff is frustrating, I might be able to get a copy of the book from the Bodlian some time thins month, can you note the details here. Rich Farmbrough, 11:08, 3 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Also might be worth trying ot contact Peralta if he si still around, he may be able to sebd a copy of his article. Rich Farmbrough, 11:10, 3 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]
I'll see about Peralta, that's a good notion. A link from worldcat about the book, I'll put in an interlibrary loan, I might be able to get it from florida or georgetown. Thanks for the help, --Nuujinn (talk) 11:13, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiHistories

Here are some relevant links regarding the WikiHistories project:

HTH,--Eloquence* 08:46, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request for AWB Settings File

Hi, I see that you have written a couple of AWB settings files. I was wondering if you would be willing to write one for me. I would like to go through and clear the backlog on Category:Articles using Infobox musical artist with deprecated parameters, and I'm not quite sure how to make it split the birth date and place into two separate lines, as would be needed with this case. I tried using the settings file you wrote for birth and death dates, but it doesn't do what I'm looking for except fix special cases where the {{birth_date}} template had not been used in the first place. Would you be willing to try expanding the settings file to accommodate what I am looking to do here? Phuzion (talk) 05:53, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have looked at this, but I will need ot come back to it. Rich Farmbrough, 00:33, 17 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]

todo

New template suggestion?

What's the best place to suggest and get checked User:Lexein/Template:Expand-barerefs, as part of the Expand- family of templates? It appears to be desirable, based on discussion at WP:ANI#Koavf, specifically WP:ANI#Not_so_arbitrary_break. --Lexein (talk) 23:40, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is something similar. I'll try to check. Rich Farmbrough, 22:40, 13 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]
{{Cleanup-link rot}} is the slightly inappropriately named template. Rich Farmbrough, 21:47, 7 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

---

Mirrorbot

I just wanted to let you know that one of your bots was being mentioned again recently on the Bot requests page. Not sure if your still interested but thought I would let you know. --Kumioko (talk) 14:16, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Rich Farmbrough, 00:25, 21 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Please read

Hello, Rich Farmbrough. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Sven Manguard Wha? 21:02, 20 August 2011 (UTC) Todo[reply]

Empty {{Merge}} templates

SmackBot should do something other than, or as well as, date {{Merge}} templates that do not mention where to merge to. I suggest it delete them and inform the editor that added the empty template that it has done so. (An example user notification.) I have also suggested the template emphasise it needs the parameter, mentioning this suggestion too. Mark Hurd (talk) 08:20, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion is taking place on Template_talk:Merge#Empty_.7B.7Btl.7CMerge.7D.7D. Debresser (talk) 16:23, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Todo

SmackBot

Hi Rich, SmackBot has been iconic and ecumenical, why change its name? Is there any chance he can go back to SmackBot? Thanks --Camilo Sanchez (talk) 01:14, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Camilo, nice of you to say. There was some concern that SmackBot's name was unwelcoming to newbies. Not sure about that myself, but that was the reason for the change. If the community wanted the old name back... Rich Farmbrough, 14:13, 27 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]
I would like to move it back to SmackBot, is the process the same for bots? --Camilo Sanchez (talk) 23:58, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Because of the number of edits, the process simply requires me to swap the account it uses, and the "bot" authorisation to be changed. Maybe Village Pump might be a place to gain consensus, if anyone else thinks it matters? Rich Farmbrough, 00:05, 7 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]
People are too busy at the village. If you can move it back to its iconic name please. Thanks --Camilo Sanchez (talk) 04:39, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Although I sympathize, I'm not going to make the move back unless it's a community decision. Rich Farmbrough, 18:18, 9 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

--

Diacritics redirects

I haven't seen any pages categorized by smackbot with "Category:Redirects from titles with diacritics" since 2008.... am I just missing something? Pages like Novak Đoković had to be done by hand. I think the reverse of yours User:RjwilmsiBot goes through at least twice a month. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:52, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hm yes, there's a number of tasks that need refreshing. Rich Farmbrough, 22:59, 8 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Does that mean this is something that will be added to the to-do list in the immediate future or something that will take some time? How often does this bot run to add a category like diacritic redirects? Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:12, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Basically a lot of this sort of thing was run off database dumps, so could be done with that sort of frequency. Database dumps died for a couple of years. However it's not that hard to catch up, if one has a recent dump, the September dump is, however giving me problems decompressing. Rich Farmbrough, 23:41, 8 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Looks like the uncompress is fixed. Rich Farmbrough, 18:08, 9 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Note that not all non-ASCII characters are diacritical. Per Category:Redirects from titles with diacritics only redirects that actually have diacritics and that target articles without diacritical titles should be given {{R from diacritics}}. Non-ASCII-titled redirects without diacritics that target ASCII-titled articles should be given {{R to ASCII}}. Specifically, æ, œ, ð, þ, ə, ʼ, ʻ, ı, and ß, and probably others, are not diacritical. So before you run SmackBot again it would be very nice if you could update it. Thanks! ☺ 155.33.149.25 (talk) 02:17, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

From SignPost

Approximately 3% of editors account for 85% of contributions to the project, according to the statistician, and participation among this group has declined "even more sharply" than the active registered userbase in toto.

Funny that. Rich Farmbrough, 16:22, 9 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

To do

  1. fix up broken archives  Done
  2. import main todo list (or build a new one off-wiki)
  3. fix the following minor edits

Needs sorting out.

Birth and graduation dates need sourcing. Rich Farmbrough, 21:30, 10 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Clumsy lead. Rich Farmbrough, 21:33, 10 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]
--

Tense problems. Rich Farmbrough, 21:36, 10 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]
---

Needs refs and parentage. Rich Farmbrough, 21:41, 10 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Should reflect on the meaning and historicity of the names. Rich Farmbrough, 18:37, 11 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]


Dinah

Redlinked template

Mughrabi Gate ramp reconstruction (February 2007)

Repetition.

m. Alice Brwon, Bristol 1 s etc.. http://mssa.library.yale.edu/obituary_record/1859_1924/1870-1880_supp.pdf p. 425

  • Needs sources.

"Bug bash sounds similar to eat one's own dog food" - this needs to go. Rich Farmbrough, 10:46, 13 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

 Not done Although this is straight-forward, I haven't done it—to "eating your own dog food is a fairly well-known concept in software development and it would probably be preferable to reword the section. —Sladen (talk) 11:34, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I'm familiar with the concept. It is more of a public-relations principle, though, and the software development benefits are a side issue. It might be worth contrasting the two, from a SD POV, since dog-food seeks an ongoing long term benefit, whereas a bug bash is a "heroic" concept. Rich Farmbrough, 12:14, 13 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The Reader

"The warden expresses the disappointment of Hanna in her anger towards Michael for not communicating with Hanna in any way other than the audio tapes." We can do better than this. Rich Farmbrough, 10:51, 13 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Bash shell

Keyboard shortcuts:

  • Don't cap "Forward" etc.
  • Don't Wikt to foreground, WP to Foreground process
  • Possibly use a table

Synonyms : http://www.hypexr.org/bash_tutorial.php#emacs

Don't cap Pinky.

 Done[7]Sladen (talk) 11:29, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Rich Farmbrough, 12:14, 13 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Kinesis

Piezo not a proper noun.. sigh. Rich Farmbrough, 11:22, 13 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

link first occurrence of Basing House, not the second


Spurious caps all over the place. And may be a good merge candidate. Rich Farmbrough, 00:15, 14 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

May need moving, certainly needs massive cleaning up. Rich Farmbrough, 00:21, 14 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Replace body with

Luigj Gurakuqi University Library (Albanian: Biblioteka e Universitetit të Shkodrës “Luigj Gurakuqi”) is the library of the Luigj Gurakuqi University of Shkodra in Shkodër, Albania. It traces its history to the establishment of the Pedagogical Institute in 1957 with a stock of about 1000 books, mainly in Albanian. Today, this library has about 150,000 books.It includes a holding of thirty two rare volumes form the early part of the sixteenth century. The older stick is in the process of digitization to ensure longevity of the items, and improve advisability. The library runs exchanges with Albanian and foreign libraries.

Bibliography

  • World Guide to Libraries, Thomson Gale, K. G. Saur.
  1. $ - dollars
  2. conversion
  3. Caps
  4. missing link around pipe?
  5. PoV
  1. dob
  2. Last hanged at Tyburn
  3. paper evidence

Other stuff

Unchallengeable take downs?

Rich, On the talk page for the proposed terms of use, you mention a takedown that is unchallengeable. While it's possible, I think it's more likely that it's a symptom of our bad communication about it or something (for which I would take responsibility). I don't think we have any that are unchallengeable right now. So, I want to write to ask if there's something I can clarify, or whether I'm missing something on my list? Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 01:14, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the matter has come up a couple of times, both on the Talk:Texas_Instruments_signing_key_controversy talk page of the article in question, and in the commentary to a recent (July) SignPost. The issue is that there only people who can issue a counter notice are the anonymous editors who originally posted the material. On most websites another person could post the material, wait for a challenge and respond to that. Here, since take-down has been implemented as an office action no one can repost the material without going against the office action (and in fact, even if they did, it would be removed by editors in support of the office action) therefore the material, which is freely published elsewhere, since the DMCA was challenged and the challenge not responded to, cannot be posted on Wikipedia. Effectively this makes Wikipedia the most censored forum for this information. Rich Farmbrough, 01:32, 11 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Interesting. My understanding from the legal team is that a DMCA takedown must be challenged by a party with legal standing, which would mean that it has to be someone who had posted the content. If we were to then suggest or passively allow someone else to post it, we would not be in full compliance. However, I'll confirm that. If that's the case, then we're in compliance with the regulations and others arguably are not. If it's an issue of interpretation, I'll find out why we're not more broad, but since Mr. Godwin structured those originally, I tend to think we're at the broadest level that he (and then Mr Brigham) felt was legally possible. But I'll get an answer and try to report back. Thanks for clarifying. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 05:10, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 September 2011

New error?

Database error From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View logs for this page A database query syntax error has occurred. This may indicate a bug in the software. The last attempted database query was:

   (SQL query hidden)

from within function "Block::purgeExpired". Database returned error "1213: Deadlock found when trying to get lock; try restarting transaction (10.0.6.46)".

Film lists

Hi there! I just came across ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Film incomplete lists while looking for some tidying-up work. It looks as though you created the category; thus may I ask, how is this category different from ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Incomplete film lists? I do see that there's a different list template used for each: {{Expand list}} or {{inc-film}} and maybe you can explain that to me as well. Before I start sorting, I want to be sure of what goes where. Thanks. Humbly, Pegship (talk) 23:08, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hm yes, the purpose is the same. The idea is to have simpler templates (many need a subject field available, Notability, this one, In-universe and Expert are good examples) though there is some challenge as to what the field should be called. So we should merge these two categories. The easiest way is to use inc-film as a wrapper for Expand-list. Rich Farmbrough, 19:50, 17 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Okey dokey...what's a wrapper, and how shall I create one? Thanks for your reply. Pegship (talk) 23:14, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Because helpful machines deserve love too!!! :D MusicLover650 (talk) 22:49, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

A cup of tea for you!

Rich, with all your hard work I thought you may be in need of some refreshment ;-) Marek.69 talk 10:29, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

Use dmy

In this edit your bot again added the {{Use dmy dates}} template without any good reason. Actually, the writer of this book is American. As I have said before, the incidental usage of a dmy type date is not reason to add the template. Please stop your bot from adding this template automatically. And I am serious about this... Debresser (talk) 12:50, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see the bot is still making these errors ([8]). There has been time for this to be addressed as the operator has been online and making edits as well. And the bot does not seem to stop anymore when its talkpage is edited. So I am going to block the bot until this issue is resolved. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:48, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[X] copied from User talk:Helpful Pixie Bot by Femto Bot, (possibly the smallest bot in the world) 16:03, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page was set up as a redirect to my talk page. I am just too busy (and too annoyed at the situation) right now to make further comment. Rich Farmbrough, 15:57, 23 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

It would be incredulous that you were not watching your bot's talk page ... and if it was on your watchlist I'm not quite sure how you could miss that many posts. Anyway no big problem, I can unblock when the issue is resolved. Question: why does editing the talk page not stop the bot? It might be a good idea to re-add this feature to avoid the need to block the bot in cases like this. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:00, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Because that was an AWB feature I used for years. All the AWB features have been wasted since it was decided that the bot could be blocked if it made a "non-render changing" edit, since AWB is not capable of distinguishing between rendering and non-rendering edits, and I had to recode everything in perl. You may think that it was a stupid, short sighted decision. I couldn't possibly comment. Rich Farmbrough, 19:22, 23 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Oh and I don't use the watchlist system. Incidentally: wikt:incredulous. Rich Farmbrough, 19:22, 23 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Rich, if you're too busy (your words) to care for your bots, then please don't run them. —Sladen (talk) 12:32, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not too busy to care for the bots, just too busy to care for every rules junkie that thinks rules are more important than the encyclopaedia. Rich Farmbrough, 13:18, 24 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]
This is all very well, but don't you agree that the bot should stop adding these templates on an automatic basis? I think I gave a very good reason, and a reply to the issue would be in order. Debresser (talk) 07:13, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly a stupid question, but why shouldn't {{use dmy dates}} be added to articles that only use dmy dates? Jenks24 (talk) 22:36, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In this edit [9] the article doesn't seem to have any dmy dates in it. One of the cleanup templates did, but the bot removed that at the same time it added the dmy tag. — Carl (CBM · talk) 01:36, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This one is another example, I think that the script caught the phrase "the set containing 3, 4, and 5 may be ..." and though that was a date. I don't think there are any dates at all in the article. — Carl (CBM · talk) 01:39, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good spotting, though since I will be removing that feature, a little late. :) Rich Farmbrough, 03:56, 26 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Feature disabled. Rich Farmbrough, 21:17, 3 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Excellent. Could you also disable the whitespace adjustment (as discussed in #Please make helpful pixie a little less eager to be helpful and as necessitated by certain editting restrictions) and add a 60 min waiting period as has been requested? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:37, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sure why not? The bot will then do nothing, but that's what it's doing now. Consider it done for version p615. Rich Farmbrough, 10:57, 4 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]
I did see your response a while ago but have been waiting for a clarification because I am not sure about your stance on the issues raised. It is a unfortunate that one has to use a block to force you to make your bot work correctly, but that seems to be the case. Please could you confirm, without any possibility of doubt, that you have enabled a waiting period (as discussed) and that your bot will no longer contravene your editing restrictions. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:35, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I have increased the waiting period to 1 hour. Rich Farmbrough, 19:59, 8 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The Signpost: 26 September 2011


--

Help with "Article Reads Like News Release"

Hey - the Widener Law page has the "News Release" message at the top...I tried to format the page after the Temple Law and U. Penn Law pages. I think the content is neutral and comparable to information found on most college/university pages. Can I remove the "News Release" tag? (I know I physically can remove it, I just don't want to piss anybody off). If there is something you think should be changed/neutralized on the page, please let me know!

Thanks 98.235.125.61 (talk) 01:22, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine to me, I removed the tag. Rich Farmbrough, 13:31, 7 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks Rich! I really appreciate it! 98.235.125.61 (talk) 21:45, 7 October 2011 (UTC) ---[reply]

Talkback

Ping. Amalthea 18:58, 6 October 2011 (UTC) Todo[reply]

Fishing...

I love that little statistic you provided. It's a fish. I need more.

500,000 per month, that's 6 million per year! My guess was 5.

'Give someone a fish and you feed him for a day; teach the person to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.' (See Distributism).

Please teach me how to fish. How did you generate that stat?

I look forward to your reply. The Transhumanist 17:28, 7 October 2011 (UTC) ---[reply]

E-mail

Hello, Rich Farmbrough. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

LikeLakers2 (talk | Sign my guestbook!) 21:07, 7 October 2011 (UTC) ---[reply]

Mirror Bot

I see you filed an RfA for Mirror Bot at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Mirror Bot which has since expired. Do you plan to file a new RfA for this bot? I think this bot could be very useful. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 09:29, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

Thanks for your comment on Talk:Kingsmill_massacre#Names_of_victims_2. I know you're busy but I'd be grateful if you could clarify it. My query is there after your post --Flexdream (talk) 11:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC) ---[reply]