User talk:Alexikoua

Leave me a new message.

Please SIGN your comments using ~~~~. That way it'll be easier for me to identify who is trying to get a hold of me.

Map

Hi Alexi, excellent work on the map! A couple of suggestions to improve it (if you feel like it).

• The spacing on some city names (e.g. Onchesmos, Kourestos, etc...) is uneven and makes them hard to read.
• You might want to use a different color for cities that are settlements of the indigenous Chaonians and Dassaretae (e.g. Himara), and different colors for colonies (Epidamnos, Apollonia).
• You might also consider using a larger font and marker for the larger and more important settlements, like Apollonia and Epidamnus, to differentiate them from the smaller ones.

Just some friendly suggestions. Keep up the good work. --Athenean (talk) 05:17, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Hoxha

I see. I did not doubt that such evidence existed, it is after all stated that he had "previous convictions", what I am more interested in is whether these activities were indeed brigandage or "resistance" activities presented as such. Could you point me to some sources (preferably online)? Cheers, Constantine ✍ 22:39, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Chams

Can you discuss in the talk page before making changes to the article? Aigest (talk) 07:16, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

I saw your proposal, but I think that chams talk page is more appropriate place for it. Other editors who have contributed greatly to this article (eg like BW) might have their opinion. You guys have agreed before on this topic so I don't see it difficult to agree again. Aigest (talk) 09:29, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

See chams talk page and tell me what you think of my prop? Aigest (talk) 09:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Don't revert Aigest. I am reporting him to AN3. THis is getting ridiculous. --Athenean (talk) 07:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Alexis the Epirotian (that's for sure)

For your participation to the Epirus related articles some (very) old guys hereby awarding you a fustanela and a membership to the replacement company of the 1/38 Evzone Regiment. Congratulations. --MadFactuarius (talk) 16:31, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Notice of possible ARBMAC sanctions

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. Thank you. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 00:37, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Also notes

So far I've checked (i'm ready to provide info, he is verifiable in googlebooks), there are no discrepancies and the facts are clear and comfirmed by other 'meanstream' works. . Actually he is accused only by pro-Albanian sources (Vickers, albania.com). I hardly believe this can be a real accusation.

I see that he adopts a anti-communist approach according to cold-war issues, but the events described are of pre-cold war period (and most important comfirmed.

Summary:

• He describes the deportation of Jews from Albania (1942)-something that is confirmed by a number of books and institutions.
• He describes Mavi (greek resistance group in s. albania)-Ballist (albanian collaborationists) vicious fighting (1942-44), something even the ones that accuse him comfirm [[1]], [[2]].
• About Borova massacre, he does not say that it happened in October 1943 (I have to apologize it was my fault, cos I wrote it accidentaly in the article, so I'm responsible for this discrepancy). There was a reprisal mission by the Germans because of partisan activity in the surrounding region (the Germans had the support of Albanian collaborationists group- the 'Ballists'-, and the Greek group-MAVI- was under a kind of cooparetion with the communists guerrillas that period).
• According to F.p.'s quote, it's not inside the book itself, but

Ruches is mentioned in a number of Epirus related articles in wiki, and the facts he describes are confirmed and in full accordance: Jews deportation from Albania, Mavi-Albanian collaborationist fighting etc.

Sources that confirm Ruches

Apart from the deportation of Jews from Albania, which is described in the article's talk page, about Mavi-Balists conflicts:

• James Pettifer - The Greek Minority in Albanian In the Aftermath of Communism (Conflict Studies Research Center): "fought as a separate resistance group against the Axis in 1943"
• Vickers, Miranda (2002). "in 1944 between the Greek nationalist Northern Epirus Liberation Front and the Albanian nationalist Balli Kombetar partisan fighters."

Some detailed descriptions of N.E.l.f. give these books:

• Costa de Loverdo. Les Maquis rouges des Balkans, 1941-1945.

It mentions the agreement between the Greek-Albanian (Mavi) resistance and the communist Albanians (p. 200) and some conflicts with Ballists (in Libochovo p. 200 and in Gjirokaster p. 248). [[3]] [[4]], [[5]]

I try to explain as simple as I can, that Ruches mentions facts that do not create discrepancies. Because a number of sources doesn't mention MAVI as resistance group it doesn't mean that it was non existent (it had a minor role in Albanian resistance especially at the country;s liberation).

For example, we have plenty of 'mainstream' sources about Greek occupation (1941-1944) that don't say a word about Cham Albanian participation in Greek resistance. Could this mean that it was non-existent? off course not, there are books that are focused on Cham topics and mention the related events.

Would you consider not to base your work on snippet views, as I see here [6] the source say "in 12 February the chiefs of Red bands of Hodja (Enver Hoxha communist leader of FNC so actually partisan groups (sic)) held a meeting in Theologue monastery" what about the conference of MAVI as Ruches says? In the same place same date? Why red bands? Or MAVI was a communist force leaded by a moslem (Hodja)? Man stop with snippet views, at least finds a source which is partially readable Aigest (talk) 07:39, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Not only Ruches, Pearson too [[7]] p.237. Why do you always make partly filtered researches? Alexikoua (talk) 08:11, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Maybe you didn't get my point, Ruches says one thing while de Loverdo claims the exact opposite(?!). Can't you see that even the sources you say support Ruches are contradictory with him? Man that is hilarious Aigest (talk) 13:53, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

It would be hilarious if there wasn't an agreement between them mention before in the same sources. About your question I decided not to take part in that debate any more.Alexikoua (talk) 21:53, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Welcome in WP:GREECE

Hi, and welcome to the WikiProject Greece! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Greece.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our sidebar points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The Announcements and Open tasks section is updated quite regularly. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPGreeceOpenTasks}} there.
• Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

• Interested in working on a more complete article? The peer review department of the project would welcome your help!
• Interested in a particular area of Greek history, geography, culture etc. ? There are already two task forces, and you could initiate the creation of more focusing on specific topics or periods.
• Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every Greece related article in Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around!

And congratulations for your GA! Great job!--Yannismarou (talk) 09:47, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Encyclopedia Britannica and illyria/albania

If you go to http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/12472/Albania you will see that this encyclopedia has a different approach to Illyrians that than the one presented here. I just thought that Encyclopedia Britannica's information would enrich this page. As I see it, most of the information on this page comes from this one author John Wilkes. More sources would improve this page, don't you think? AnnaFabiano (talk) 17:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Hallo and welcome! Since, most of the bibliography presented states that the Illyrian-Albanian continuity is possible but there are also many counterarguments presented in Origin of Albanian, the sentence:

'The northern tribes were slavicised in the course of the Middle Ages, while the Albanians may represent an instance of southern Illyrian (or Thraco-Illyrian) continuity.'

seems to be enough for the lead. The conclusion of certain Illyrian-Albanian continuity in the lead is for sure misleading.Alexikoua (talk) 18:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Ancient Epirus

Hello Alexi! I am afraid I am not really knowledgeable on the subject. What I can see is that, despite the monarch at the top, the federal structure of the League existed below, as the citations in Epirote League show. I also favour Epirus (ancient state) as a title, since it is usually perceived as a unitary state, but perhaps this duality of the monarch/hegemon and the League of Epirote communities ought to be given a bit more emphasis? Regards, and keep up the good work! Constantine ✍ 11:00, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

DYK

Hello! Your submission of Epirus (ancient state) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:57, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

You article

Hey its a fine article, i can work on it when i have the time.What is this dyk ?Megistias (talk) 20:17, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Epirus (ancient state)

On August 14, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Epirus (ancient state), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady (talk) 20:15, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Wellcome back

Wellcome back you POVish-bad boy. Τρελλάθηκες ε? Τι κάνεις? Έχω μιά υπόνοια ότι ήσουν κάπου στην Ήπειρο αλλά δεν μπορώ να το αποδείξω..--Factuarius (talk) 17:44, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Mitralexis image

Hello! Your submission of Marinos Mitralexis at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Binksternet (talk) 17:22, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Indeed, the image is problematic. On the one hand, you have uploaded it under a wrong fair use rationale (it is appropriate only when discussing an artwork/artist). You could try the {{Non-free historic image}} template, but again, the picture may be considered as not necessary to the article, so it may get deleted at some point (I am not an expert on the finer points of copyright). I have however uploaded the photo of Mitralexis himself, with the proper rationales, which should be OK. Constantine ✍ 10:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Fustanella

I wanted to use that 1883 book to confirm some of the details in the article. Another user came to us in IRC over a Greek/Albanian dispute and tried to use sources to flesh information out. I am an idiot when it comes to Greece and Albania, my forte is usually Japan and Eastern Europe. But, if I could help solve a dispute, I will. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 04:00, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Marinos Mitralexis

On August 28, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Marinos Mitralexis, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

NW (Talk) 23:15, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Sameis Star trek tribe

Hello i saw an imaginary "Star trek" tribe sameis in chameria related articles.There is no such thing in primary or secondary historical sources.Its made up.I know you did not put it there but what is going on?Megistias (talk) 09:26, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi Alexikoua. Thanks and have you a good and productive winter also. I am back also. I have sent you some photos taken during my holidays in Epirus (Konitsa, Nekromanteio, Ioannina, Mouseio kerinon omoiomaton), I hope to like and find them useful, since I am out feel free to use them if you think so. I have more and I am thinking to use them in the Epirus article. Regards, --Factuarius (talk) 14:34, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Clean up

Hello, could you help me clean this up? Illyrian warfare. I wrote it.Megistias (talk) 16:34, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Albania Census

Can you please not hurry when making changes. These things tend to be very fragile, and we do not need to rush and make biased moves. We were making very good progress on the talk page. See you there! AnnaFabiano (talk) 11:29, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Check here

Check this out.Albanian nationalismMegistias (talk) 18:59, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

How you dare to revert me. --Factuarius (talk) 19:32, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

OK, next time I will use English npov sources. Martin Baldwin Edwards. --Factuarius (talk) 20:00, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

That's POV. Provide source. --Factuarius (talk) 20:17, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Northern Epirus

Template:Northern Epirus has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 22:42, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

WP:ANI

Your comments have been brought up at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Canvassing by user Alexikoua. You may want to explain why you think admin J Milburn (talk · contribs) is a sockpuppet. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 18:24, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the note. You would do best to explain the situation at ANI- I intend to take no further action, but there may be repercussions (such as checkusers) from the thread. J Milburn (talk) 08:21, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, this kind of issue is simply not my speciality. There is not a lot I can do, I am not certain of how to proceed here. J Milburn (talk) 20:14, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

epirus (region)

can you please weigh in here..? or at least correct the vagenetia part that megistias added the guy cant understand what the source says its quite frustrating adding content or creating that colorcode for the linguistic and religious map and having it deleted because the guy wont sit and read whats added87.202.3.215 (talk) 07:03, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

and tbh i find it a bit weird to argue over such silliness considering that were generally despite faults goodintentioned users unlike whats going on with the whole templatefordeletion business over in north epirus. so plz just give your opinion on the newlyadded content so we can seriously discuss it the guy doesnt want to discuss at all he even thought that my cabanes reference wasnt good enough becasue it mentioned the illyrians on the title even though i used it to quote the interpretation for a passage from herodotus that cabanes himself names as 'le mariage d'Agariste: les molosses sont grecs'. about the template and the whole north epirus chameria albanians and greeks business the problem here is admins who arent knowledgeable in the matters so they are easily 'convinced' by disruptive tactics the absolute low of wikipedai87.202.3.215 (talk) 07:13, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

the last time i edited epirus...you might remember me from back when you were writing the greek minority in albania article and i added some content...future perfect at sunrise was an admin here is he still an admin?87.202.3.215 (talk) 07:19, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Sure, I remember you. Seems there was kind of misunderstanding in the article, apart from specific minor points that needed some kind of rewording, according to my view.

I will take a closer look, especially in Vagenetia, but I kindly ask you to initiate discussion with User:Megistias, since you see that there are not serious disagreements and a consensus can be easily reached.Alexikoua (talk) 07:52, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation.

I saw your ANI report about Sarandioti/Alarichus, but I have filed an SPI here [8]. Please feel free to transfer your evidence there, it is a better place for that than ANI. Regards. --Athenean (talk) 05:11, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sarandioti.... well you have a good evidence I am wondering the same thing cheers. Danger^Mouse (talk) 13:26, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Albanian nationalism

Yes, I got it. See my comment in the talk page, please understand that for many Albanians and scholars Hodja is seen as a traitor of Albanian nationalism, now it comes as a champion of Albanian nationalism. Aigest (talk) 13:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

IMO communist regime continued only Illyrian theory (others were neglected Pelasgians, Etruscians, Greater Albania). I say continued because the Illyrian theory was always among Albanians since end of XIXth century. Hoxha just continued where other Albanian rulers left before him. We can say simply what the reference itself says, that during communist regime, other theories were were forgotten or at least left aside official history, while the communist regime was focused on Albanian Illyrian continuity(1)(2)(3) The references point clear to directions Hoxha gave to scholars.

The problem here come from the still non definition of the article. What do we have in mind with Albanian nationalism? While Albanian-Illyrian is a scientific matter (true or not, whatever in the end it remains scientific) the others theories (Pelasgians etc) are pure speculative. And in the case of Albanian communist regime where only Illyrians were propagandized and the other theories were left aside that had more or less a scientific impact in Albania itself, keeping nationalist fervor low. Only after communist regime these hypothesis came along with Greater Albania concept again (though not generally supported by scholars again, of which the majority of them is "old school" forged in communist regime) Aigest (talk) 08:16, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

The Daco-Thracian hypothesis (it began in end XIX and first half of XX century) was always rejected by Albanians:) not a new thing for communist regime to do:). As I said above the Illyrian case is a scientific one and the propaganda related to it is understandable as it happened in every country where "glorious past" was evoked. The main concern here Albanian nationalism and its ideologies as a specific case. Propagandizing "only" Illyrians and neglecting other theories and concepts including Greater Albania, the communist regime was more restrictive on Albanian nationalist fervor than the others before and after him. The difficulties in this come from the main idea of the article. None of the wiki articles related to nationalism in any country has such a form. In its form is a mix of different topics. Where it does want to point? Aigest (talk) 08:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Yes but communist regime effect on Albanian nationalism as a whole, are seen as having a restriction impact. See the cited Vickers on talk page for that issue Aigest (talk) 10:32, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

No I didn't mean that. My comment was in general as a whole, while focused on Illyrian-Albanian continuity he left aside other nationalistic ideologies and fantasies. None dared to speak of Kosovo or even Chams issue, let Greater Abania, none spoke on Pelasgians, let etruscans and ancient greeks. Comparing actual situation with what happened during communist regime, it is clear that the communist regime had a restriction impact on nationalism fervor than the latest governments, which actually do nothing to propagate but not even do nothing to stop, a thing which communists kept under control. Hope I was clear this time Aigest (talk) 11:13, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Super. See you then! I believe that we can come to a common ground, nearer to the valuable "N" (neutrality). —Anna Comnena (talk) 19:38, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Zappas Olympics

I was looking forward to reading it when complete. Well done! :) Constantine ✍ 21:44, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

PS, I think such an interesting article ought to be present on the front page, so I nominated it for the DYK. Cheers, 22:47, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Good point. There are two good options: "that the Zappas Olympics (1875 games medal pictured)..." and include the medal picture, or "that the Zappas Olympics, named after Evangelis Zappas (pictured)..." and include Zappas' statue. Personally, I'd prefer the former, but you are the creator. Constantine ✍ 08:40, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Autonomous Epirus flag

A better (and larger) version of the A.H. flag you uploaded some time ago can be found here (it's my work and it's freeware). Regards. 98.142.208.51 (talk) 00:47, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Very nice and detailed, but I believe it's better to have something similar to this [[9]], with the wings wide open [[10]].Alexikoua (talk) 19:44, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Νο Ι am just another sock of Sarandioti badly envying the new one. --Factuarius (talk) 07:51, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Write Sarandioti. That's the most possible combination. Next write Hitler. Next write Nitze. Next write satan. Next write A.Crowely. Next write Golden Dawn. ..How much money do you have? --Factuarius (talk) 08:11, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

I don't really have a problem either way. No Saradioti's sock seems to have problem with WP recently. --Factuarius (talk) 08:21, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Cleanup

Wanna help clean this up and improve it?[11]Megistias (talk) 17:22, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

[[12]]

DYK for Zappas Olympics

On September 18, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Zappas Olympics, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

SoWhy 13:44, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello Alexi! Can you please join the discussion here, there is a user who insists on a very peculiar definition of "international" for the Zappas Olympics, being intent on designating them as the first truly international Olympics. I admit I am getting very annoyed by him (είναι άσχετος από ελληνική ιστορία και προσπαθεί να μου την πει κι από πάνω). Could you, as the article's creator, take a look and provide a neutral opinion? Thanks, Constantine ✍ 23:14, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Albanians origin

Ok, I understand you point about Albanian history. I agree with you. However I would remove Albanian nationalism at all, until it gets properly arranged. As in the form it has now, it is a mess, and has allot of material left out. —Anna Comnena (talk) 16:25, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Great! —Anna Comnena (talk) 16:43, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

You may be correct on Albanian immigrants, though allot of sources state that Albanians get Greek names: "Immigrants may assume Greek names and/or declare a Greek residence, even if they reside permanently in Albania." More. On the other hand, those records only show the proportion of immigrants, not native Albanians. 50.000 Chams and 150.000 Arvanites. —Anna Comnena (talk) 10:37, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

population exchange

hey alex im the epirus-north epirus guy i might bring some sources later since i dont have them here right now but i wanted to talk about the removal...the 1mil figure sounds too high if i remember correctly around 1.1 out of 1.2 mil greek orthodox were exhanged from ASIA MINOR and THRACE...the rest 100,000 came from bulgaria the soviet union etc. and the greek orthodox population of asia minor was about 1.5mil so probably 400,000 greeks or somewhat less if we take other factors into account so perhaps 350-400 were killed before the exchange thats still a really high number but less than half of what the sentence claimed87.202.46.157 (talk) 02:27, 22 September 2009 (UTC) the 200,000 that i said before was ONLY about the pontians these guys did really suffer a lot87.202.46.157 (talk) 02:35, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Removing talk comments

Hello Alexikoua. Please file an SPI if you think Kreshnik25's talk comments should be removed. You are on thin ice per the language of WP:VANDAL, 'Discussion page vandalism,' unless you are sure he falls under WP:SOCK. EdJohnston (talk) 16:38, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Commons

Yes, I am aware of it. Unfortunately, this guy appears to be right, since Greek legislation does not allow FoP, i.e. to take and publish pictures of buildings, statues or other such publicly exhibited stuff that might be covered by the architect's or sculptor's etc copyright. There is a discussion going on at the moment in Commons, and several people from the Greek WP are trying to find out exactly what the law stipulates. However, until the situation has become cleared, this user (Iconoclast) has been asked repeatedly not to mass-nominate images for deletion. Being obviously only in Commons for trolling, he's been banned repeatedly (just now for a month). Until the definitive decision comes out (bear in mind, if it is negative, the images will be deleted), just ignore him and undo his requests for deletion. For more info see here. Cheers, Constantine ✍ 11:18, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Souliotes again

Apparently references are misused and many of them are left aside. Moreover some OR is going there. See talk page on that issue Aigest (talk) 11:37, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Gigantic edits at Albania

When you make a very large edit, even though you mark it as a 'copy edit job', you should be aware it is going to roil the waters. You are an experienced editor and you can probably get the job done even without such large changes. Most likely you have diplomatic skills also and you have ways to persuade people from another ethnic group to support your work. Admins will not allow this article to break down in chaos, they will probably do something. In that case, it is better for you to be part of the solution than part of the problem. EdJohnston (talk) 15:56, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

What I did, is totally valid. What Megistias did, is not! WP:OR is not allowed; requesting advice is. Please stop doing police work on my account, it only shows lack of good faith and lack of respect. I personally had respect for you, as you seemed to be more oriented towards building reliable encyclopedia, but it looks like I was wrong. —Anna Comnena (talk) 21:15, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Have you actually read WP:OR, Anna? WP:OR is unsourced stuff like Illyrian paganism survived into the Middle Ages, and Islam was imposed on Albanian Pagans and Christians. Megistias' edits may not be to your liking, but everything is sourced. Hence it cannot be OR by definition. You're still new here, I suggest you familiarize yourself with the rules a bit better. And by the way, there are very good reasons why contribs logs are public. Dab is one of our best, most highly respected administrators. To accuse him of "Anti-Albanianism" is sheer folly. Alexikoua and Megistias are outstanding contributors that have built many good articles from scratch. You seem to be a bit quick to assume bad faith and that everyone is against Albanians. Do everyone a favor and show more good faith, and don't run around accusing everyone you disagree with of bias against Albanians, OK? --Athenean (talk) 21:28, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

τσαμηδες

μια και βλεπω οτι επεξεργαστηκες το συγκεκριμενο αρθρο στο παρελθον...οποτε γνωριζεις...και το εριξα τωρα μια ματια, πως εγιναν οι 20χιλ τσαμηδες που διωχτηκαν απο το Ζερβα 170-440(!!!)χιλ μεσα σε 60- χρονια ακομα κι αν προσθεσουμε τους τσαμηδες της αλβανιας οι οποιοι πρεπει να ηταν ελαχιστοι..; εκτος κι αν ζωντοβολαγαν σε ρυθμους κοσοβο x 10 δλδ...87.202.60.49 (talk) 07:24, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

It's one of hystory's greatest mysteries. The number of 440.000 is adopted by Vickers, she doesn't explain if a extraordinaty baby boom situtation occured among them, this number is cited by Cham organizations, which makes it biased anyway. I've found the number of 170,000 by Rudometof which also is adopted by Cham organizations, it seems to be also somewhat exaggerated. Moreover, imri.bg states that these numbers are for sure biased. A Post-World War II baby boom scenario is for sure irrelevant here (Greek sources give an estimation of 50,000 according to balkan's avrg gertility rate).Alexikoua (talk) 08:04, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Panagiotis Soutsos

On October 3, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Panagiotis Soutsos, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 06:30, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Pindus National Park

Thanks for your message. It's an interesting article about an interesting place. I've just made a change to the bear section; it suggested that there was more than one bear species in the park, but I think there is only Ursus arctos arctos. I'm not a bear expert, so perhaps you could check this? It would be nice to get a ref stating that the bear is this species before the article appears on the front page in a few hours' time. Regards, Ericoides (talk) 08:56, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Pindus National Park

On October 8, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pindus National Park, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

SoWhy 12:28, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Greater Albania

Hi, Alexi. About your comment on my talk page User talk: Anna Comnena, I am not sure I completely get your point, though I would be glad to help! —Anna Comnena (talk) 09:59, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

HAF ranks

Well, the presence of US-style ranks in the HAF site is more due to its own conscious and unconscious modelling on the USAF, and less on conventions of usage (to state this clearer, I don't think that a deliberate decision has been made by the HAF to use Army-equivalent ranks; its just that they are the US analogues and they are more handy nowadays). There are two systems of ranks for air forces: the German-French-Russian (and US) tradition which assigns them Army-style ranks, and the British Commonwealth one that gives special ranks. Greece follows the latter, as do a handful of other countries outside the Commonwealth. In such cases, it is customary to use British equivalent ranks to highlight that in the corresponding language, the officer in question is not called a "General" or "Colonel", but something else. I have seen this in several English-language history and defense publications, both for Greece and for these other countries. I certainly won't engage in an edit war over this ;), but I simply think that British ranks are a more "correct" form for rendering Greek Air Force ranks. Constantine ✍ 08:57, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Don't worry, I wasn't offended or anything. :) It was a perfectly good & valid objection... Constantine ✍ 11:45, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Ioannis Giagkos

On October 22, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ioannis Giagkos, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Jake Wartenberg 05:57, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Cyprus

Hey Alexikoua,

Would you be interested in helping me bring Cyprus up to GA-status. It's GA review is on hold now, and it would be a pity to miss this chance. --Athenean (talk) 03:04, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Zappas article peer review

I have added a few more comments to the review. I have also done some further copyedits to sharpen the prose. I don't have any more time to spare, but I wish you luck with the article. Brianboulton (talk) 18:51, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Please , Stop the bandalisem in Albanian pages ..!! --Artemisa ne adenice (talk) 16:29, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

What exactly of what I added is vandalism?Alexikoua (talk) 16:33, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Moschopolis

I'm sorry to say that, but consensus is not an obscure concept that floats in the air. When I say consensus, it's implied that this consensus should be backed up by sources. Either you give me five or six miserable sources where Moschopolis is called Moscopole, or I'll wait 24 hours and make the same reverts over and over again. And if my son wants to have my blessing after I die, he will do the same. Guildenrich (talk) 21:39, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Just calm down, I suggest you make additional arguments in the article's talk page. Googlebooks search hits is one, but isn't enough. I see that this former metropolis is historically known as an Aromanian center, why not keep that name?Alexikoua (talk) 14:45, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Because it's historical name is Voschopolis (first name) and/or Moschopolis. If you say that it's name is Moscopole, give the appropriate sources to back it up. Guildenrich (talk) 17:08, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Vikos-Aoos National Park

User:Pyrotec has made Vikos-Aoos National Park a GA. Congratulations!

But above all, thank you for your good work. While obviously not quite as beautiful as the the park itself, the article is really beautiful. I am looking forward to a nice hour or two reading all the details and dreaming of a day in the Vikos gorge. Hans Adler 18:49, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Arvanites

I'm sorry, what is the difference between Arvanites and Albanians? Guildenrich (talk) 21:10, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Speaking to my sock

Hi my second me. It seems that either you are my sock[13] or I am according to Guildenrich[14]. Although I have repeatedly ask him to go for a check or to stop accusing[15][16], he insisting spreading the rumour around (per Goebels: "accusing accusing something is always remain"). Recently he did it again with Ironholds[17]. To me actions must taken. Will you do it or I will? --Factuarius (talk) 09:20, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

"Suppose" Fut? --Factuarius (talk) 09:40, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

I am very annoyed learning that he accuse me of being your sock. Until today I was the master. I am going to post a protest for this unfair sadden change, directly to his talk page. Can you plz do it for me? --Factuarius (talk) 19:55, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Speaking to my 'master'

depressing, but take an advice: Try for a change to be a little wiser, Ι wasn't arrogant when a few hours before you were my tail and that's an evidence about who could be the real 'master'. Life is full of surprises Alexikoua and tomorrow is a new day, he may change again his mind, and then you might be able to answer by yourself to the question.. --Factuarius (talk) 22:29, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, the book says that many Albanians trace their roots, not that Albanians are actually descendants of Achilles, the gay lover of Patroclus. Please, let's discuss this at the talk-page. Guildenrich (talk) 23:27, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Sarandioti, banned (21:50, 28 September 2009) [18] after voting (21:11, 17 July 2009). Vote stays. Guildenrich (talk) 14:06, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Epirus Map

The map found on the Epirus (region) is clearly original research. This one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:EpirusEduMap.jpg being created as synthesis of several cherry picked sources is clearly against policies. Just as well, one can cherry pick eight other academic sources from another point of view and then show it as fact. Azalea pomp (talk) 22:19, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

I posted a response on the Epirus region page. Azalea pomp (talk) 00:45, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

I posted some more responses on the Epirus region talk page. Azalea pomp (talk) 19:57, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Some more comments again on the Epirus page. My main purpose for the Epirus page it so assure that we are accurately using the sources for the maps. I want them to be correct and thank you for your work on fixing the Mycenaean dot map. What is interesting is that the Greeks, Macedonians, Albanians, Illyrians, Dacians, Thracians, Phrygians, Paeonians, Bryges are all Indo-European anyway, but still I think that since we are dealing with very specific groups and many of which are little known, we just can't blanket terms like Thracian on tribes just because we may think they are related. We have to use the academic sources and what the scholars have. Whatever personal views or theories we have, we should not include those. Azalea pomp (talk) 21:51, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks the new map of Mycenaean sites looks nice. Azalea pomp (talk) 03:59, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Xenos2008

See [here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Xenos2008]--Anothroskon (talk) 17:00, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Himariote Greek dialect

On December 5, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Himariote Greek dialect, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 17:57, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Albanian genocide

Hello, you have previously edited the redirect at Albanian genocide. If you remain interested, please see the discussion at Redirects for discussion. Grsz¹¹ 15:17, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Book

Is there a link where Ruches' book can be read online?--Muzakaj (talk) 12:34, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Here [[19]], p.35.Alexikoua (talk) 12:36, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

• I meant to regularly read it, not snippet view it. The search doesn't show anything about Paulos Antzias on that book [20].