User talk:Catflap08

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
41		Yogachara (talk)						Add sources
1,249		Video game console (talk)						Add sources
3		Isamu Togawa (talk)						Add sources
5		Komeito (1964-1998) (talk)						Add sources
86		Controversies surrounding Yasukuni Shrine (talk)						Add sources
5		Kosen-rufu (talk)						Add sources
74		Mobility scooter (talk)						Cleanup
39		Jehovah's Witnesses and congregational discipline (talk)						Cleanup
327		Swabia (talk)						Cleanup
1,363		Shinzō Abe (talk)						Expand
7		Nobuteru Ishihara (talk)						Expand
132		Japanese diaspora (talk)						Expand
376		Social Democratic Party (UK) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
21		True Buddha School (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
91		French–German enmity (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
34		Protestant Reich Church (talk)						Merge
14		Community of Protestant Churches in Europe (talk)						Merge
59		Golden Twenties (talk)						Merge
18		Sōsuke Uno (talk)						Wikify
42		Democratization of knowledge (talk)						Wikify
9		Karlsruhe Zoo (talk)						Wikify
2		Hans Iwand (talk)						Orphan
1		Richard Causton (Author) (talk)						Orphan
2		Classification of Buddha's teaching (talk)						Orphan
4		Sadāparibhūta (talk)						Stub
13		Marianne Cruz (talk)						Stub
4		Tattvasiddhi (talk)						Stub
30		Freiburg school (talk)						Stub
8		National Highway 21 (India)(old numbering) (talk)						Stub
50		Church history (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:26, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 September newsletter

The finals for the 2015 Wikicup has now begun! Congrats to the 8 contestants who have survived to the finals, and well done and thanks to everyone who took part in rounds 3 and 4.

In round 3, we had a three-way tie for qualification among the wildcard contestants, so we had 34 competitors. The leader was by far Casliber (submissions) in Group B, who earned 1496 points. Although 913 of these points were bonus points, he submitted 15 articles in the DYK category. Second place overall was Coemgenus (submissions) at 864 points, who although submitted just 2 FAs for 400 points, earned double that amount for those articles in bonus points. Everyone who moved forward to Round 4 earned at least 100 points.

The scores required to move onto the semifinals were impressive; the lowest scorer to move onto the finals was 407, making this year's Wikicup as competitive as it's always been. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:

1. Cas Liber (submissions), who is competing in his sixth consecutive Wikicup final, again finished the round in first place, with an impressive 1666 points in Pool B. Casliber writes about the natural sciences, including ornithology, botany and astronomy. A large bulk of his points this round were bonus points.
2. Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points), second place both in Pool B and overall, earned the bulk of his points with FPs, mostly depicting currency.
3. Cwmhiraeth (submissions), first in Pool A, came in third. His specialty is natural science articles; in Round 4, he mostly submitted articles about insects and botany. Five out of the six of the GAs he submitted were level-4 vital articles.
4. Harrias (submissions), second in Pool A, took fourth overall. He tends to focus on articles about cricket and military history, specifically the 1640s First English Civil War.
5. West Virginian (submissions), from Pool A, was our highest-scoring wildcard. West Virginia tends to focus on articles about the history of (what for it!) the U.S. state of West Virginia.
6. Rodw (submissions), from Pool A, likes to work on articles about British geography and places. Most of his points this round were earned from two impressive accomplishments: a GT about Scheduled monuments in Somerset and a FT about English Heritage properties in Somerset.
7. Rationalobserver (submissions), from Pool B, came in seventh overall. RO earned the majority of her points from GARs and PRs, many of which were earned in the final hours of the round.
8. Calvin999 (submissions), also from Pool B, who was competing with RO for the final two spots in the final hours, takes the race for most GARs and PRs—48.

The intense competition between RO and Calvin999 will continue into the finals. They're both eligible for the Newcomers Trophy, given for the first time in the Wikicup; whoever makes the most points will win it.

Good luck to the finalists; the judges are sure that the competition will be fierce!

Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 11:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Supernatural

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Supernatural. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Precious again

reasonable moves
Thank you, German/English user who started with "just keeping a eye on things :-)", for watching over topics such as Germany, Nichiren Buddhism and Soka Gakkai, for using terms of today and the reasonable moves from evangelikal to evangelisch, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:19, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

A year ago, you were the 976th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:21, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gospel of Mark

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gospel of Mark. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Violation of IBAn block

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

For your comments about Hiriji at ANI. You wanted to be blocked anyway, and since he has been blocked for one week for replying to your comments, it seems only fair that you get the same. Fram (talk) 14:44, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

I've shortened the block by about twelve hours. Since your block and Hijiri's stem from the same incident, and since both were meant as one-week blocks, it seems to me that they ought to expire at the same time, and it's fairer to shorten your block than to lengthen his. Nyttend (talk) 17:28, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Regarding ArbCom

It is worth noting that the first time you went to ArbCom, all that you really asked that they do was issue an interaction ban. Understandably, that is all that they did. If you were to seek a broader review of recent circumstances from them, I have every reason to believe that it would be accepted, and that the decision they render might do more to address the issues which you have raised elsewhere. I think it might be worth taking the week you are blocked from editing here to gather together any evidence you might wish to present to ArbCom if you choose to go that route, because it can, unfortunately, be a rather long process to do so. John Carter (talk) 15:19, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Catflap08 and Hijiri88 and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted in most arbitration pages please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Nyttend (talk) 17:53, 23 September 2015 (UTC)