User:Gerda Arendt/ACE 2018: Difference between revisions
Gerda Arendt (talk | contribs) voted |
Gerda Arendt (talk | contribs) expand in sadness |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Please first read [[User:Shock Brigade Harvester Boris/A pocket guide to Arbitration]]. Then pay a minute of silence to its author [[User talk:Shock Brigade Harvester Boris#Precious|whom to have known was one of the pleasures]] on the site. |
Please first read [[User:Shock Brigade Harvester Boris/A pocket guide to Arbitration]]. Then pay a minute of silence to its author [[User talk:Shock Brigade Harvester Boris#Precious|whom to have known was one of the pleasures]] on the site. (The link doesn't work any more, because his talk was archived, [[User talk:Shock Brigade Harvester Boris/Archive 6#Precious|rry again]]. It's {{diff|User talk:Shock Brigade Harvester Boris|866721294|866587533|it's still true}}.) He [[User talk:Shock Brigade Harvester Boris/Archive 8#ArbCom|would have been an arb]] for whom I'd have voted without a question. |
||
If you want analysis and recommendations, look what others offer. To know what I go for, or just compare what the candidates answered, stay here and read their answers, - I offer only teasers in the table below.<!-- - I marked by [[File:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] for whom I voted.--> I may sound boring because my question this year is the same as last year. Sadly, some who answered to my liking, didn't live up to their answers. New: I mark good answers. (Needless to say: good for me.) That's no guarantee I'll vote for the candidate ;) - 21 November: I voted now for those marked green, but there's no guarantee that I wouldn't change my mind if things change. |
If you want analysis and recommendations, look what others offer. To know what I go for, or just compare what the candidates answered, stay here and read their answers, - I offer only teasers in the table below.<!-- - I marked by [[File:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] for whom I voted.--> I may sound boring because my question this year is the same as last year. Sadly, some who answered to my liking, didn't live up to their answers. New: I mark good answers. (Needless to say: good for me.) That's no guarantee I'll vote for the candidate ;) - 21 November: I voted now for those marked green, but there's no guarantee that I wouldn't change my mind if things change. |
Revision as of 15:10, 28 November 2018
Please first read User:Shock Brigade Harvester Boris/A pocket guide to Arbitration. Then pay a minute of silence to its author whom to have known was one of the pleasures on the site. (The link doesn't work any more, because his talk was archived, rry again. It's it's still true.) He would have been an arb for whom I'd have voted without a question.
If you want analysis and recommendations, look what others offer. To know what I go for, or just compare what the candidates answered, stay here and read their answers, - I offer only teasers in the table below. I may sound boring because my question this year is the same as last year. Sadly, some who answered to my liking, didn't live up to their answers. New: I mark good answers. (Needless to say: good for me.) That's no guarantee I'll vote for the candidate ;) - 21 November: I voted now for those marked green, but there's no guarantee that I wouldn't change my mind if things change.
6 seats are available to be filled, but Arbcom does not need all 6 to be filled. If you do not believe a candidate is suitable, vote oppose[a] |
My simple question (and the same as last year): Can you agree with Opabinia regalis here?
Answers
Notes
- ^ Template adapted from User:Worm That Turned/ACE2015
- ^ blocked 11 November, unblocked 12 November
- ^ withdrawn 13 Nov
- ^ withdrawn 15 Nov
These guides represent the thoughts of their authors. All individually written voter guides are eligible for inclusion. |