Jump to content

User talk:Hawkeye7: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: MassMessage delivery
MilHistBot (talk | contribs)
Awarded A-Class cross to Hawkeye7
Line 337: Line 337:
</div></div> <section end="technews-2020-W13"/> 17:07, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
</div></div> <section end="technews-2020-W13"/> 17:07, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Johan (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Johan_(WMF)/Tech_News_target_list_3&oldid=19881727 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Johan (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Johan_(WMF)/Tech_News_target_list_3&oldid=19881727 -->
== Congratulations from the Military History Project ==
{| style="border: 2px solid gold; background-color: whitesmoke;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | [[File:WPMH ACR 2.png|90px]]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |&ensp;'''The ''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/Awards#A-Class_crosses|Military history A-Class cross]]'''''&ensp;
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gold;" | On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the A-Class cross for [[Frank Borman]], [[INTERFET logistics]], [[British nuclear tests at Maralinga]], [[Charles Duke]], and [[Operation Black Buck]]. {{user0|Peacemaker67}} via [[User:MilHistBot|MilHistBot]] ([[User talk:MilHistBot|talk]]) 00:30, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
|}

Revision as of 00:30, 27 March 2020

Archives:

2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · 2015 · 2016 · 2017 · 2018 · 2019 · 2020 · 2021 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024
Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

Re: Today's Featured Article

Hello, Hawkeye7. You have new messages at Deeday-UK's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Portals tasks requests: presented in the newsletter below...

WikiCup 2018 November newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is South Carolina Courcelles (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 147 GAs, 111 GARs, 9 DYKs, 4 FLs and 1 ITN. Our finalists were as follows:

  1. South Carolina Courcelles (submissions)
  2. Wales Kosack (submissions)
  3. Hel, Poland Kees08 (submissions)
  4. SounderBruce (submissions)
  5. Scotland Cas Liber (submissions)
  6. Marshall Islands Nova Crystallis (submissions)
  7. Republic of Texas Iazyges (submissions)
  8. United States Ceranthor (submissions)


All those who reached the final win awards, and awards will also be going to the following participants:

Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition.

Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2019 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email) and Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email).

WikiCup 2019 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2. With 56 contestants qualifying, each group in Round 2 contains seven contestants, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for Round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

  • United States L293D, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with ten good articles on submarines for a total of 357 points.
  • Adam Cuerden, a WikiCup veteran, came next with 274 points, mostly from eight featured pictures, restorations of artwork.
  • Denmark MPJ-DK, a wrestling enthusiast, was in third place with 263 points, garnered from a featured list, five good articles, two DYKs and four GARs.
  • United States Usernameunique came next at 243, with a featured article and a good article, both on ancient helmets.
  • Squeamish Ossifrage was in joint fifth place with 224 points, mostly garnered from bringing the 1937 Fox vault fire to featured article status.
  • Ohio Ed! was also on 224, with an amazing number of good article reviews (56 actually).

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews on 143 good articles, one hundred more than the number of good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Well done all!

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk).

AutoCheck report for December

The following articles were graded B class:

I intend to nominate this template eventually to be redirected much in the same way I did here. Is this technically possible? –MJLTalk 14:38, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If it is done the same way as the others, with a redirect, then it should not require any change to the bot. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:47, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

20:59, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Re this, I started this on the talk page. I think it should be cleared before doing anything else to the sentence.

The reverting IP was me, I forgot to login. Sorry for that. OneShot010 (talk) 15:07, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. OneShot010 (talk) 06:42, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello
I notice that you edited one of my comments here a while ago to fix a broken link and template: Thank you for doing that, but I hadn’t intended them to be links, just indications of where the links would be in the proposed wording (apologies, I was just being lazy in not using the nowiki function). I’ve fixed it now, but thought I’d better tell you. Anyway, thanks, Moonraker12 (talk) 22:56, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2020

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

WikiCup 2020 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 57 contestants qualifying. We have abolished the groups this year, so to qualify for Round 3 you will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

  • New York (state) Epicgenius, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with a featured article, five good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 895 points.
  • England Gog the Mild came next with 464 points, from a featured article, two good articles and a number of reviews, the main theme being naval warfare.
  • United States Raymie was in third place with 419 points, garnered from one good article and an impressive 34 DYKs on radio and TV stations in the United States.
  • Somerset Harrias came next at 414, with a featured article and three good articles, an English civil war battle specialist.
  • Pirate flag CaptainEek was in fifth place with 405 points, mostly garnered from bringing Cactus wren to featured article status.
  • The top ten contestants at the end of Round 1 all scored over 200 points; they also included United States L293D, Venezuela Kingsif, Antarctica Enwebb, England Lee Vilenski and Nepal CAPTAIN MEDUSA. Seven of the top ten contestants in Round 1 are new to the WikiCup.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. In Round 1 there were four featured articles, one featured list and two featured pictures, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. Between them, contestants completed 127 good article reviews, nearly a hundred more than the 43 good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Contestants also claimed for 40 featured article / featured list reviews, and most even remembered to mention their WikiCup participation in their reviews (a requirement).

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

WikiCup newsletter correction

There was an error in the WikiCup 2020 March newsletter; United States L293D should not have been included in the list of top ten scorers in Round 1 (they led the list last year), instead, United States Dunkleosteus77 should have been included, having garnered 334 points from five good articles on animals, living or extinct, and various reviews. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

00:35, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2019 AFL Women's Grand Final

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2019 AFL Women's Grand Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 04:41, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hans-Joachim Marseille

Ready when you are. Dapi89 (talk) 11:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Engineer Special Brigade (United States) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 09:01, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FAC withdrawn but not processed

Does this need some bot attention? I think the @FAC coordinators: may not have noticed it -- it's not in the archives. The nominator withdrew it and deleted it from the WP:FAC page fairly quickly. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:07, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tks Mike, yes this did come and go very quickly -- if spotted at the time I would probably have removed as OOP and organised its detonation but probably simpler now to just close as a withdrawal, assuming its belonging to last month doesn't trouble Hawkeye and the bot too much... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:54, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Engineer Special Brigade (United States) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Engineer Special Brigade (United States) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 00:41, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17:14, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: February 2020





Headlines
  • Armenia report: Wiki project on Museums with My Armenia
  • Brazil report: Moreira Salles Institute GLAM initiative in Brazil
  • Finland report: The Helsinki then and now exhibition
  • France report: GLAM related blogposts
  • Indonesia report: Proposing collaboration with museums in Bali; First Wikisource training in the region
  • Netherlands report: Students write articles about Media artists, Public Domain Day 2020, Wiki Goes Caribbean, WikiFridays at Ihlia - Wikimedia Nederland in January & February 2020
  • Norway report: Wikipedia editing workshop with the Norwegian Network for Museums
  • Serbia report: Great dedication of librarians
  • Sweden report: Historic photos; Support for international Wikimedia community; Library training tour; Many GLAMs improved on Wikidata
  • UK report: Kimonos and Khalili
  • Ukraine report: Winning photos Wiki Loves Monuments shown in different cities; Libraries Lead an All-Ukrainian Challenge
  • USA report: Black History Month and Open Access Anniversaries
  • Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons report: Summary of pilot projects, and what's next
  • Wikidata report: Leap into Wikidata!
  • WMF GLAM report: New Team Leadership, GLAM-Focused Grants Review, OpenGLAM Declaration Research
  • Calendar: March's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Engineer Special Brigade (United States) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:05, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2019 AFL Women's Grand Final

The article 2019 AFL Women's Grand Final you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2019 AFL Women's Grand Final for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 21:21, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FACBot 6 approved

Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/FACBot 6 has been approved! Let me know if you have any questions. Happy editing! --TheSandDoctor Talk 20:52, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLXVII, March 2020

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:51, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2019 AFL Women's Grand Final

The article 2019 AFL Women's Grand Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2019 AFL Women's Grand Final for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 03:41, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

21:17, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Alfred Worden

On 19 March 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Alfred Worden, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Indefensible (talk) 03:56, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Hood Simpson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Order of Leopold (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17:07, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

The Military history A-Class cross
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the A-Class cross for Frank Borman, INTERFET logistics, British nuclear tests at Maralinga, Charles Duke, and Operation Black Buck. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:30, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]