Jump to content

User talk:Bogdan~enwiki: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
talk
Line 1: Line 1:
<font color = "red"><big>Please note that all image-related Bot messages are stored at [[User talk:Bogdan/Image Related]]</big></big></font>
<font color = "red"><big>Please note that all image-related Bot messages are stored at [[User talk:Bogdan/Image Related]]</big></big></font>



{{ukrwelcome}}--[[User:Irpen|Irpen]] 06:13, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
{{ukrwelcome}}--[[User:Irpen|Irpen]] 06:13, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Line 235: Line 234:
== Request ==
== Request ==


Greetings Bogdan, as you are one of the few native speakers of Russian language among the Russian military history task force members, we would like to kindly ask you to help us on the next matter: we need to translate this rus-wiki article into english - [[:ru:1-й особый гвардейский стрелковый корпус]] - as we don't have any Russian Rifle Corps articles on en-wiki. The translation of that article will be a very good addition to Wiki and Military history project! Would you be able to help us with this? Thanks and best regards, --[[User:Eurocopter tigre|Eurocopter tigre]] 17:46, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Greetings Bogdan, as you are one of the few native speakers of Russian language among the Russian military history task force members, we would like to kindly ask you to help us on the next matter: we need to translate this rus-wiki article into english - [[:ru:1-? ?????? ??????????? ?????????? ??????]] - as we don't have any Russian Rifle Corps articles on en-wiki. The translation of that article will be a very good addition to Wiki and Military history project! Would you be able to help us with this? Thanks and best regards, --[[User:Eurocopter tigre|Eurocopter tigre]] 17:46, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
:Sure, why not. <s>Although this might take me a while as I've been farely busy the last few weeks.</s> This article is much shorter than I thought, I'll be sure to get started...Cheers, [[User:Counterstrike69|Bogdan]] 20:17, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
:Sure, why not. <s>Although this might take me a while as I've been farely busy the last few weeks.</s> This article is much shorter than I thought, I'll be sure to get started...Cheers, [[User:Counterstrike69|Bogdan]] 20:17, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
::Thanks a lot, that'll be very helpfull!! --[[User:Eurocopter tigre|Eurocopter tigre]] 20:22, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
::Thanks a lot, that'll be very helpfull!! --[[User:Eurocopter tigre|Eurocopter tigre]] 20:22, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
[[1st Guards Rifle Corps|Done]]. [[User:Counterstrike69|Bogdan]] 21:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
[[1st Guards Rifle Corps|Done]]. [[User:Counterstrike69|Bogdan]] 21:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

*Hi Bogdan, could you please help us again with this-[[:ru:150-я стрелковая дивизия]].? Cheers, --[[User:Eurocopter tigre|Eurocopter tigre]] 08:22, 27 October 2007 (UTC)


==Airmobile Flag==
==Airmobile Flag==
Line 253: Line 250:
| Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at [[{{{noticeboard|Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents}}}]] regarding {{{reason|an issue that you may be involved with}}}. {{#if:{{{1|}}}|The discussion can be found under the topic [[:{{{1}}}]].}} You are free to comment at the discussion, but please remember to keep your comments within the bounds of the [[WP:CIVIL|civility]] and "[[WP:NPA|no personal attack]]" policies. Thank you.
| Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at [[{{{noticeboard|Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents}}}]] regarding {{{reason|an issue that you may be involved with}}}. {{#if:{{{1|}}}|The discussion can be found under the topic [[:{{{1}}}]].}} You are free to comment at the discussion, but please remember to keep your comments within the bounds of the [[WP:CIVIL|civility]] and "[[WP:NPA|no personal attack]]" policies. Thank you.
|}<!--Template:ANI-notice-->[[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 00:16, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
|}<!--Template:ANI-notice-->[[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 00:16, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

== Possibly unfree Image:Ukr_airborne.jpg ==
An image that you uploaded or altered, [[:Image:Ukr_airborne.jpg]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images]] because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the [[:Image:Ukr_airborne.jpg|image description page]]. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2007 October 18#Image:Ukr_airborne.jpg|the discussion]] if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 00:25, 18 October 2007 (UTC)<!-- Template:Idw-pui -->

==Redirecting user pages?==
Is there any particular reason you want your user and user talk pages to direct to those of a nonexistent user? It's highly irregular and confusing.--[[User:Chaser|chaser]] - [[User_talk:Chaser|t]] 00:25, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
:What's so confusing? This is the account that I creaed when I joined Wikipedia, and when I saw that there was no account named user:Bogdan (my name is Bogdan) I redirected it...[[User:Counterstrike69|Bogdan]] 00:30, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
::If you'd like to change your username, see [[WP:CHU]]. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 00:32, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Alright then, is possible to delete that page so that it can truly be nonexistant? [[User:Counterstrike69|Bogdan]] 00:38, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
:If you "own" a page (like your own userpage), then you can tag it with {{tl|db-owner}} to get rid of it. Since you don't technically have that account, you can tag [[User:Bogdan]] with {{tl|db-author}} to get rid of it. Admins will be loathe to delete the user talk page you've been using, though. The easiest thing to do is just to request a rename at the link Videmus Omnia gave you above. Cheers!--[[User:Chaser|chaser]] - [[User_talk:Chaser|t]] 01:49, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

==Speedy tags==
Also, you're really not supposed to remove speedy deletion tags from images you uploaded [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Ukr_navyseaman.gif&diff=prev&oldid=165106754]. Please leave making a determination about whether or not the images are truly copyright violations to administrators who patrol [[CAT:CSD]]. Thank you.--[[User:Chaser|chaser]] - [[User_talk:Chaser|t]] 00:28, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
:I know I'm not, but these tags where [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Ukraine_airforce_general_major.gif&curid=11700596&diff=165086024&oldid=165021792 removed] by an administrator, he didn't get all of them (all the Ukrainian insignia ones) so I finished what was left. [[User:Counterstrike69|Bogdan]] 00:32, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
::Hmm. This situation is tricker than I thought. The threads [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive306#Disruption_via_overzealous_copyvio_tagging_of_free_images|here]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=165175536#A_question_about_admins_involved_with_articles here] offer some background, but no real resolution. I suppose it would be better if they go through [[WP:IFD|IFD]] if anyone wants them deleted. Thanks for the explanation.--[[User:Chaser|chaser]] - [[User_talk:Chaser|t]] 01:49, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

== Image:Ukr_admeral.jpg listed for deletion ==
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, [[:Image:Ukr_admeral.jpg]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 October 18#Image:Ukr_admeral.jpg|discussion]] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 00:30, 18 October 2007 (UTC) <!-- Template:Idw -->

== Image:Ukr_general.jpg listed for deletion ==
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, [[:Image:Ukr_general.jpg]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 October 18#Image:Ukr_general.jpg|discussion]] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 02:15, 18 October 2007 (UTC) <!-- Template:Idw -->

== IfD notification ==
The images from uniforminsignia.net that were used to illustrate the articles on Ukrainian rank insignia have been nominated for deletion [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2007_October_18#Ukrainian_rank_insignia here]. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 02:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
:So you're proposing that we do what with the article after there are no images? [[User:Counterstrike69|Bogdan]] 02:43, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
::Actually, I'm proposing that the copyrighted images be replaced with free content, either Ukrainian government images or user-created ones. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 02:54, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
In other words...you don't really care about the article, but you only care about copyrights? [[User:Counterstrike69|Bogdan]] 03:02, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
:There wouldn't be any articles if we ignored copyright issues and let the encyclopedia get sued into bankruptcy. Every little bit by volunteers like Videmus Omnia helps Wikimedia's lawyers to avoid dealing with it themselves. This may be a borderline case, but that's why we have a deletion discussion about it.--[[User:Chaser|chaser]] - [[User_talk:Chaser|t]] 03:13, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
::You honestly believe that informinsignia.net is going to sue wikipedia? [[User:Counterstrike69|Bogdan]] 03:18, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
:::Although that's a possibility, the main issue is not about getting sued - it's about [http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Licensing_policy creating free content]. It's wrong to steal someone else's work because we think we can get away with it. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 03:21, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
If you put it that way, I guess it's just a matter of opinion. Whether you think that we have no right to take the website's work, or whether I think that the website has no right to claim what the Ukrainian government has dubbed "public domain" as their own. [[User:Counterstrike69|Bogdan]] 03:27, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

I encourage you to discuss the images at IFD if you want your thoughts considered by the closing admin.--[[User:Chaser|chaser]] - [[User_talk:Chaser|t]] 05:21, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

== Award ==

{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};"
|rowspan="2" valign="top" | [[Image:Hmel-3.jpg|80px]]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Order of Bohdan Khmelnytsky''' - 3rd Degree
|-
|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | You are hereby awarded this Ukrainian National Award "The Order of Bohdan Khmelnytsky - III" for continued coverage of the Ukrainian military entries across its various branches, brigades and divisions. Salute. --[[User:Riurik|Riurik]]<sup>[[User talk:Riurik|(discuss)]]</sup> 06:47, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
|}
:Wow Riurik, you find the best time to give someone an award. Just as I was thinking of leaving Wikipedia, I receive an award. Thanks so much, [[User:Counterstrike69|Bogdan]] 14:57, 21 October 2007 (UTC).
::Hey, I have not been contributing much lately so I feel that at least those who have been working should be recognized for all their labors. Even with the award, sometimes taking a break helps avoid getting burned out. See you around. --[[User:Riurik|Riurik]]<sup>[[User talk:Riurik|(discuss)]]</sup> 03:11, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:14, 27 October 2007

Please note that all image-related Bot messages are stored at User talk:Bogdan/Image Related

Welcome

Hello, Bogdan~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are interested in Ukraine-related themes, you may want to check out the Ukraine Portal, particularly the Portal:Ukraine/New article announcements and Portal:Ukraine/Ukraine-related Wikipedia notice board. The New article announcements board is probably the most important and the most attended one. Please don't forget to announce there the new articles you create. Adding both boards to your watchlist is probably a good idea.

Again, welcome! --Irpen 06:13, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Images

I am sorry you had all this trouble with images. In Wikipedia, m:Comyright paranoia is pervasive and some users enjoy harassing others about images since the pretense of doing so to protect the Foundation gives them a perception of impunity while in many cases it would take less than a minute to simply retag the image uploaded by an inexperienced uses with the tag. Anyway, I will watch your talk page and when I see you being warned about some image I will take a look to see whether it can be saved from deletion. But even if you are unsure about copyright, please always provide the image source. It will make preserving it a whole lot easier. Happy edits, --Irpen 06:13, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 21:09, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]



Image copyright problem with Image:Vepr.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vepr.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding images

Hi Bogdan. Regarding this your talk message: you can use the image request templates for filing standard images requests that will be automatically put to the respective category. I'd even ask you to do so. I requested that category to be populated: we need thousands of images on UA-related pages, so potential photographers (mappers etc.) need a consistent to-do list.

And talking about images: I think placing our national flag next to "the page looks bad" text on your userpage was a bad idea. Cheers, Ukrained 21:06, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Bogdan 21:32, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Award

Military barnstar
For contributions related to Ukrainian military and particularly Air Force ranks and insignia of Ukraine --Riurik(discuss) 05:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks! Although I'm honored to have received my first award, I have to say that I expected one after I finished the Air Force, Navy, Ground forces series :P. Thanks again! Bogdan 00:16, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Only happy to recognize the work you do, better late than never. Will be keeping an eye in the future not to miss other great contributions by Counterstrike69 a.k.a. Bogdan. Best regards, --Riurik(discuss) 00:00, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lukashenko

I think what happened at [1] is that someone tried to introduce a photo of Lukashenko without uploading it to Wikipedia (which isn't technically possible). I been looking for a free photo of President Lukashenko, but had not have much luck yet. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 02:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Transliteration policy

As a member of WikiProject Ukraine, you are invited to participate in the discussion about transliteration of Ukrainian words. I would appreciate your participation. Discussion is located here. Thank you. — Alex(U|C|E) 17:54, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kyiv, not Kiev

Hello,

Can I ask why you changed the spelling from Kyiv to Kiev? The old style is being phased out everywhere, and people coming from government or news sites will be confused.

Everybody but CNN and Wikipedia seems to have changed.

Thanks,

Horlo

Award

I have proposed an award at the Ukraine Wikiproject - You appear to be a member of the project and I would like some feedback from you - thanks // Finns

Naval Aviation flag

I think that aviation flag is the same as the one for Navy. http://fleet.sebastopol.ua/viewbigpic.php?pic=p1186580172&header=%CD%C0%CB%B2%D2%C0%CB%C8%D1%DF%20%C4%CE%D1%D5%CE%D7%D3 Ceriy 04:01, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OrBat Structure

It comes mostly from MoD news articles, military forums from people who either currently serve, or recently retired. Patch images. Information I have was collected over a period of about 8-9 month. Ceriy 17:02, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then, I guess I'll try looking and/or asking myself. The only problem might citing the sources as Wikipedia is rather strict when it comes to Wikipedia:Verifiability, Thanks, Bogdan 18:56, 16 August 2007 (UTC).[reply]
It is easier to search for information if you already know what exactly you are looking for. We have numbers of those brigades now, we need to expand the articles.
I'll add some references to the articles, once I'm home. Ceriy 20:00, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
1992-2000 Structure incomplete but in russian. http://www.soldat.ru/files/3/22/49/95/ Ceriy 00:22, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks alot. But unfortunatly I can't help you, I'm going away on vacation tommorow for about 2 weeks. I'll be sure to read through that when I get back. Thanks again, Bogdan 00:46, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Noted you were thinking about a new wikiproject for the former Soviet countries' military. You might be interested in the Russian & Soviet taskforce of the main WP:MIL project. Buckshot06 16:14, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also sources; take a look at http://www8.brinkster.com/vad777/glavn.htm; under CIS. Warning: it is only accessible for a few hours after midnight Eastern Standard Time, and then closes until midnight again. It's a goldmine. Cheers Buckshot06 16:46, 13 September 2007 (UTC) I have those files about Ukrainan military saved to my harddrive. If you cant acces them on vlads website, I can upload them somewhere.Ceriy 18:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks guys, if I can reach the website I'll be sure to save it on my own hard drive. Bogdan 23:11, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Airmobile

Have already started to work on those. I'll put in as much info as I can, and if you want you can reorganize that into a good article. I can write them as good. I'll have 25 Airborne finished in a day or two.Ceriy 12:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you are interested in topics related to Ukraine. I would appreciate if you offered your opinion on the subject of the article Berehynia. The discussion takes place at the article's talk page. Thanks in advance. --Hillock65 11:42, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would but my knowledge on Ukrainian mythology is very limited. Sorry, Bogdan 23:11, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, like I said, trying something bold... I'd been discussing it on the talk/naming page. Sorry! • Lawrence Cohen 03:21, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello,

Thanks for the invite and welcome.

I am just the type of person who likes to do one thing at a time. I think that the name should really be Kyiv, for all of the reasons I outlined on the page.

I think that the Kyiv page should be not a good article, but a featured article. Once I start on that path, however, I will probably focus completely on that. If you have any other requests, I would be happy to help. However, long ago I learned the expensive way that if I don't focus, I won't get anything done well.

Thanks, Horlo 04:23, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Bogdan, your work on the UA-military topics is greatly appreciated. Just a friendly reminder, please take some time to make a good fairuse rationale for every non-free image you upload. There are dedicated users whose entire activity is image patrol. They have no interest in articles and tag images for deletion mercilessly. The only way to keep the non-free images safe is justifying their use very well. --Irpen 02:21, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the warning. And I hope I won't have to run into any image-deletion guys in the near future. But to be honest, I truly don't know the first thing about copyright/fair use/public domain etc...I noticed that you retagged this image. Would that sort of license be acceptable for most military images (given that I follow WP:NFURG)? Also, would an image taken at...for example an air-show, or arms expo be considered some kind free use image? And lastly, does "PD-UA-exempt" apply to anything other then logos? Best regards, Bogdan 03:42, 25 September 2007 (UTC).[reply]
PD-UA-exempt applies to very little but logos, state symbols, flags, coats of arms, etc. Actually, we are rather lucky in Ukraine to have a law that puts the logos of all organizations, including the commercial enterprises, into non-copyrightable category
With the exception of the photographing the copyrighted work of art, the copyright for most of images taken at airshows or arms expos belong to the photographer who took them or his employer. If you took such images, you are free to license it in any way you wish. Your Wikipedia text contributions are licensed by default as GFDL. Many people use the same license for their own images they upload. {{cc-by-sa}} is a very similar license to GFDL and due to some small subtleties many find that it fits better for images than GFDL.
If you know the photographer or can get in contact with him, your best bet is to get his permission to release the image under one of free licenses. {{cc-by-sa}} of all free licenses acceptable here is probably the best bet to get the photographer agree to because it requires the attribution to the original author upon any further use down the chain and it requires those who use it to also release the derivative work under free license, thus preventing the reusers to attach any new restriction to the work whose original author released it.
If the free license cannot be obtained (newspapers would unlikely release their image under a free license) in order to qualify for Wikipedia, the image has to be justifiable under WP:FU concept. First it has to be irreplaceable. Secondly, the image has to be of crucial importance to illustrate the article and a free replacement not only cannot be found but reasonably unlikely to ever be obtained. For example, the images of the old tank that are parked in the museums cannot be claimed irreplaceable as any Wikipedian can go to the museum and take a picture of it. The image of the military unit in active action in a dangerous place, OTOH, is truly irreplaceable as wondering strangers are unlikely to be with the camera in the war-torn Kosovo. So, you should always add a fairuse rationale to any non-free image that would state three things:
  1. the source of the image
  2. explanation of why it is crucial for an article it illustrates
  3. why the free replacement is not likely to be possible.
For instance, a copyrighted image taken by the media that would illustrate the aircrash during the Sknyliv airshow disaster would be irreplaceable for that article since there is no way to make a picture of this tragic event now and there were no precedents to this day of the commercial media agreeing to release their property under a free license (no wonder, it is their bread and butter.) But such image would not be acceptable to illustrate a Su-27 article, unless the article discusses the incident and the image would help the reader understand it better. HTH, --Irpen 03:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll be sure to read the wiki guidelines and retag all my images according to your outline. Thanks again, Bogdan 19:48, 25 September 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Did you know

Updated DYK query Did you know? was updated. On 25 September, 2007, a fact from the article Marine Corps (Ukraine) , which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Allen3 talk 18:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you don't mind

Hello,

First, congratulations on the Ukrainian Air Force page. It is very well written and comprehensive.

I made a few small grammar tweaks on it, I hope you don't mind.

Thanks,Horlo 01:52, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I don't mind. Don't hesitate to help out/add on to anything that I might have missed (from what I see there was quite a bit). You have been very inspired in the naming debate, please, aim some of that initiative to some other topics, I think a lot of people would really appreciate it...You might also want to take a look at this, thanks for the notice, Bogdan 02:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bogdan/Counterstrike (what do you prefer?), I put that tag there because while there are lots of sources, much of the text, especially the new middle bit, has no references. It's not sources, it's just that there are no footnotes. Would you like me to indicate where I think there need to be footnotes/refs instead of adding the sources tag at the top? It's the sourced information that will turn it into a real encyclopaedia article. Cheers Buckshot06 08:38, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, whenever you like just put "{fact}" next to the statements that you think need a ref, and I'll provide a source.

P.S. My name is Bogdan. Thanks for the help, Bogdan 18:36, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, noticed the cool new pic of the Su-27 you uploaded. Just thought I should remind you that your explanation for the status cuts off in midsentance, so you might want to fix that. Which article do you want to put it in? Cheers Buckshot06 20:36, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean it cuts off?
And I was going to put it in Ukrainian Air Force, but I'm currently waiting for a reply from the author. Until then...I guess I'll just leave it be. Regards, Bogdan 22:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go back and look at the page - the sentance you wrote does not make sense. Cheers Buckshot06 19:46, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you talking about the comment part (of file history)? Bogdan 19:53, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This part -

==Rationale== This image of Ukrainian Air force Su-27s is importance to illustrate the current Ukrainian air force arsenal. The chances of someone coming up to a Ukrainian Air Force base and taking a free use image, are

Ceriy 20:13, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh...that was just my mistake. At first when I uploaded the image I put the wrong knid of license on. Once I noticed it I changed the license, but the file history stayed down there and there no way to remove it. It cuts off because the initial edit is just too long to fit in that box. Thanks the warning though, Bogdan 20:51, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Ukrspetsexport
Bohdan Boyko
History of Kiev
Soviet partisans
T-64
Leonid Popov
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25
De-Russification
FC Shakhtar-2 Donetsk
Dnipropetrovsk
People's Movement of Ukraine
Ukrainian Sea Guard
Type 90
Tsentralna Rada
Kiev Institute of Electrotechnology
Valentyna Shevchenko
Ostroh
Kiev Bank Union
Cleanup
Hetmanate
History of Åland
Khazaria
Merge
Missile
Satellite nation
Dacia (car)
Add Sources
Soviet order of battle for invasion of Poland in 1939
Type 99
Ukrainophone
Wikify
History of the Faroe Islands
Foreign Intelligence Service (Russia)
Yuriy Zbitnyev
Expand
Sevastopol
Politics of Ukraine
Legal status and local government of Kiev

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 02:36, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Ukr_viceadmiral.gif

I have tagged Image:Ukr_viceadmiral.gif as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. ElinorD (talk) 23:35, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI. --Irpen 00:11, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Irpen. That actually cought my attention a while ago, but I just don't know what to say to that. It's something so trivial...Bogdan 00:13, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Greetings Bogdan, as you are one of the few native speakers of Russian language among the Russian military history task force members, we would like to kindly ask you to help us on the next matter: we need to translate this rus-wiki article into english - ru:1-? ?????? ??????????? ?????????? ?????? - as we don't have any Russian Rifle Corps articles on en-wiki. The translation of that article will be a very good addition to Wiki and Military history project! Would you be able to help us with this? Thanks and best regards, --Eurocopter tigre 17:46, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, why not. Although this might take me a while as I've been farely busy the last few weeks. This article is much shorter than I thought, I'll be sure to get started...Cheers, Bogdan 20:17, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot, that'll be very helpfull!! --Eurocopter tigre 20:22, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Bogdan 21:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Airmobile Flag

As far as I know the Airmobile forces didn't get their own flag. Or do you have other information? Ceriy 04:46, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually not positive...but I'm pretty sure I've seen one though. It looks somewhat like the ground forces flag but with a parachute (unless that was a joke/unofficial). I put that request on the Ukrainian portal just in case someone came across it. Thanks, Bogdan 23:13, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.redstar.ru/2007/08/01_08/4-0.jpg Flag like that? Ceriy 16:52, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. That's their official one right? Bogdan 19:47, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That flag is of russian VDV, but I don't think that it is official, as for Ukrainian I don't know. Since there is no mention of a separate flag in any documents, and official armed forces flag list, I think they use the same one as any other ground forces unit. Ceriy 20:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ANI posting on username issue

Hello Bogdan~enwiki. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue that you may be involved with. You are free to comment at the discussion, but please remember to keep your comments within the bounds of the civility and "no personal attack" policies. Thank you.

Videmus Omnia Talk 00:16, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Ukr_airborne.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ukr_airborne.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 00:25, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting user pages?

Is there any particular reason you want your user and user talk pages to direct to those of a nonexistent user? It's highly irregular and confusing.--chaser - t 00:25, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's so confusing? This is the account that I creaed when I joined Wikipedia, and when I saw that there was no account named user:Bogdan (my name is Bogdan) I redirected it...Bogdan 00:30, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you'd like to change your username, see WP:CHU. Videmus Omnia Talk 00:32, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then, is possible to delete that page so that it can truly be nonexistant? Bogdan 00:38, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you "own" a page (like your own userpage), then you can tag it with {{db-owner}} to get rid of it. Since you don't technically have that account, you can tag User:Bogdan with {{db-author}} to get rid of it. Admins will be loathe to delete the user talk page you've been using, though. The easiest thing to do is just to request a rename at the link Videmus Omnia gave you above. Cheers!--chaser - t 01:49, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy tags

Also, you're really not supposed to remove speedy deletion tags from images you uploaded [2]. Please leave making a determination about whether or not the images are truly copyright violations to administrators who patrol CAT:CSD. Thank you.--chaser - t 00:28, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know I'm not, but these tags where removed by an administrator, he didn't get all of them (all the Ukrainian insignia ones) so I finished what was left. Bogdan 00:32, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm. This situation is tricker than I thought. The threads here and here offer some background, but no real resolution. I suppose it would be better if they go through IFD if anyone wants them deleted. Thanks for the explanation.--chaser - t 01:49, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ukr_admeral.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ukr_admeral.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 00:30, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ukr_general.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ukr_general.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 02:15, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IfD notification

The images from uniforminsignia.net that were used to illustrate the articles on Ukrainian rank insignia have been nominated for deletion here. Videmus Omnia Talk 02:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So you're proposing that we do what with the article after there are no images? Bogdan 02:43, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I'm proposing that the copyrighted images be replaced with free content, either Ukrainian government images or user-created ones. Videmus Omnia Talk 02:54, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In other words...you don't really care about the article, but you only care about copyrights? Bogdan 03:02, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There wouldn't be any articles if we ignored copyright issues and let the encyclopedia get sued into bankruptcy. Every little bit by volunteers like Videmus Omnia helps Wikimedia's lawyers to avoid dealing with it themselves. This may be a borderline case, but that's why we have a deletion discussion about it.--chaser - t 03:13, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You honestly believe that informinsignia.net is going to sue wikipedia? Bogdan 03:18, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Although that's a possibility, the main issue is not about getting sued - it's about creating free content. It's wrong to steal someone else's work because we think we can get away with it. Videmus Omnia Talk 03:21, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you put it that way, I guess it's just a matter of opinion. Whether you think that we have no right to take the website's work, or whether I think that the website has no right to claim what the Ukrainian government has dubbed "public domain" as their own. Bogdan 03:27, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I encourage you to discuss the images at IFD if you want your thoughts considered by the closing admin.--chaser - t 05:21, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Award

The Order of Bohdan Khmelnytsky - 3rd Degree
You are hereby awarded this Ukrainian National Award "The Order of Bohdan Khmelnytsky - III" for continued coverage of the Ukrainian military entries across its various branches, brigades and divisions. Salute. --Riurik(discuss) 06:47, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wow Riurik, you find the best time to give someone an award. Just as I was thinking of leaving Wikipedia, I receive an award. Thanks so much, Bogdan 14:57, 21 October 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Hey, I have not been contributing much lately so I feel that at least those who have been working should be recognized for all their labors. Even with the award, sometimes taking a break helps avoid getting burned out. See you around. --Riurik(discuss) 03:11, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]