East Slavic languages: Difference between revisions

East Slavic languages
East Slavic languages
Geographic; distribution	Eurasia (Eastern Europe, Northern Asia, and the Caucasus)
Linguistic classification	Indo-European Balto-Slavic Slavic East Slavic languages; ; ;
Early form	Old East Slavic
Subdivisions	Belarusian; Russian; Ukrainian; Rusyn; Old East Slavic†; Ruthenian†; Old Novgorodian†;
ISO 639-5	zle
Glottolog	east1426
	Distribution of the East Slavic languages in Eurasia:[citation needed] Russian Belarusian Ukrainian Rusyn

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 18:58, 18 October 2022

The East Slavic languages constitute one of three regional subgroups of the Slavic languages, however, by number of speakers, East Slavic languages far outnumber the West Slavic and South Slavic language families. These languages are currently spoken natively throughout Eastern Europe, and eastwards to Siberia and the Russian Far East, while being also spoken as a lingua franca in many regions of Caucasus and Central Asia.

The common consensus is that Russian, Ukrainian and Belarusian are the existent East Slavic languages;^[1] Rusyn is mostly considered as a separate language too, but some classify it as a dialect of Ukrainian.^[2] Nowadays Belarusian and Ukrainian languages are placed into a separate Central Slavic subgroup by modern scholars,^[3] based on their initial role in formation of Balto-Slavic Languages and equidistant lexical position of Ruthenian between West Slavic languages such as Polish and East Slavic languages such as Russian.^[4]^[5]

The East Slavic languages descend from a common predecessor, the language spoken in the medieval Kievan Rus' (9th to 13th centuries), the Rus' language which later evolved into Ruthenian, the language of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (13th to 18th centuries) in the Dnieper river valley, and into Russian, the language of the Grand Duchy of Moscow (13th to 16th centuries) in the Volga river valley accordingly. All these languages use the Cyrillic script, but with particular modifications. Belarusian and Ukrainian, which are descendants of Ruthenian, have a tradition of using Latin-based alphabets—the Belarusian Łacinka and Ukrainian Latin alphabets, respectively (also Rusyn uses Latin in some regions).^{[citation needed]}

Classification

Differentiation

The East Slavic territory exhibits a linguistic continuum with many transitional dialects. Between Belarusian and Ukrainian there is the Polesian dialect, which shares features from both languages. East Polesian is a transitional variety between Belarusian and Ukrainian on one hand, and between South Russian and Ukrainian on the other hand. At the same time, Belarusian and Southern Russian form a continuous area, making it virtually impossible to draw a line between the two languages. Central or Middle Russian (with its Moscow sub-dialect), the transitional step between the North and the South, became a base for the Russian literary standard. Northern Russian with its predecessor, the Old Novgorod dialect, has many original and archaic features. Due to the influence of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth over many centuries, Belarusian and Ukrainian have been influenced in several respects by Polish, a West Slavic language / Lechitic. Ruthenian, the mixed Belarusian-Ukrainian literary language with a Church Slavonic substratum and Polish adstratum, was, together with Middle Polish, an official language in Belarus and Ukraine until the end of the 18th century.^{[citation needed]}

Orthography

sound	Letters
sound	Russian	Belarusian	Ukrainian	Rusyn
/ʲe, je/	е	е	є	є
/e/	э	э	е	е
/i/	и	і	і	і
/ʲi/			і	ї
/ji/			ї	ї
/ɨ/	ы	ы	-	ы
/ɪ/	-	-	и	и
/ɤ/	-	-	-	ы
/ʲo/	ё	ё	ьо	ё

Phonology

Isoglosses	Northern Russian	Standard Russian (Moscow dialect)	Southern Russian	Standard Belarusian	Standard Ukrainian	Examples
reduction of unstressed /o/ (akanye)	no	yes^{[n 1]}			no^{[n 2]}	R. голова́ /ɡɐlɐˈva/, B. галава́ /ɣalaˈva/, U. голова́ /ɦɔlɔˈʋa/ "head"
pretonic /ʲe/ (yakanye)	/ʲe/	/ʲi/	/ʲa/		/e/^{[n 3]}	R. земля́ /zʲiˈmlʲa/, B. зямля́ /zʲaˈmlʲa/, U. земля́ /zeˈmlʲa/ "earth"
Proto-Slavic *i	/i/				/ɪ/^{[n 4]}	R. лист /ˈlʲist/, B. ліст /ˈlʲist/, U. лист /ˈlɪst/ "leaf"
Proto-Slavic *y	/ɨ/				/ɪ/^{[n 4]}	R./B. ты /ˈtɨ/, U. ти /ˈtɪ/ "thou, you"
stressed CoC	/o/				/i/^{[n 5]}^{[n 6]}	R. ночь /ˈnot͡ɕ/, B. ноч /ˈnot͡ʂ/, U. ніч /ˈnʲit͡ʃ/ "night"
Proto-Slavic *ě	/e̝~i̯ɛ~i/	/e/			/i/^{[n 5]}^{[n 6]}	R. се́мя /ˈsʲemʲa/, B. се́мя /ˈsʲemʲa/, U. сі́м'я /ˈsʲimja/ "seed"
Proto-Slavic *c	/t͡s/^{[n 7]}^{[n 8]}				/t͡s, t͡sʲ/
Proto-Slavic *č	/t͡ɕ/^{[n 9]}^{[n 8]}			/t͡ʂ/	/t͡ʃ/	R. час /ˈt͡ɕas/, B. час /ˈt͡ʂas/, U. час /ˈt͡ʃas/ "time (of day)"
Proto-Slavic *skj, zgj	/ɕː/,^{[n 10]} /ʑː/			/ʂt͡ʂ/, /ʐd͡ʐ/	/ʃt͡ʃ/, /ʒd͡ʒ/
soft dental stops	/tʲ/, /dʲ/^{[n 11]}			/t͡sʲ/, /d͡zʲ/	/tʲ/, /dʲ/	R. де́сять /ˈdʲesʲitʲ/, B. дзе́сяць /ˈd͡zʲesʲat͡sʲ/, U. де́сять /ˈdesʲatʲ/ "ten"
Proto-Slavic *v	/v, f/^{[n 12]}		/w/	/v/ [v, w]	/w/ [β, w]	R. о́стров /ˈostraf/, B. во́страў /ˈvostrau̯/, U. о́стрів /ˈostriʋ/ "island"
/f/ (in loanwords)	/f/		/x~xv~xw~xu̯/	/f/
Prothetic /v~w~u̯/	no^{[n 13]}		yes			R. о́стров /ˈostraf/, B. во́страў /ˈvostrau̯/, U. о́стрів /ˈostriʋ/ "island"
Proto-Slavic *g	/ɡ/		/ɣ/		/ɦ/	R. голова́ /ɡɐlɐˈva/, B. галава́ /ɣalaˈva/, U. голова́ /ɦɔlɔˈʋa/ "head"
Hardening of final soft labials	no		yes
Hardening of soft /rʲ/	no			yes	partially
Proto-Slavic *CrьC, ClьC, CrъC, CrъC	/rʲe/, /lʲe/, /ro/, /lo/			/rɨ/, /lʲi/, /rɨ/, /lɨ/	/rɪ/, /lɪ/, /rɪ/, /lɪ/
Proto-Slavic -ъj-*, -ьj-	/oj/, /ej/			/ɨj/, /ij/	/ɪj/
Proto-Slavic adj. end. *-ьjь	/ej/	/ij/,^{[n 14]} /ej/	/ej/^{[n 15]}	/ij/	/ɪj/, /ij/
Proto-Slavic adj. end. *-ъjь	/oj/	/ɨj/,^{[n 14]} /oj/	/oj/^{[n 16]}	/ɨj/	/ɪj/
Loss of the vocative case	no	yes^{[n 17]}			no
3 sg. & pl. pres. ind.	/t/		/tʲ/	/t͡sʲ/	/tʲ/	R. ду́мают /ˈdumajut/, B. ду́маюць /ˈdumajut͡sʲ/, Uk. ду́мають /ˈdumajutʲ/ "(they) think"
Dropping out of 3 sg. pres. ind. ending (in e-stems)	no		yes
3 sg. masc. past ind.	/v~w~u̯/^{[n 18]}	/l/		/v, w/		R. ду́мал /ˈdumal/, B. ду́маў /ˈdumau̯/, U. ду́мав /ˈdumaʋ/ "(he) thought"
2nd palatalization in oblique cases	no			yes		R. руке́ /ruˈkʲe/, B. руцэ́ /ruˈt͡se/, U. руці́ /ruˈt͡sʲi/ "hand" (locative or prepositional case)

Notes

^ Except for the Polesian dialect of Brest
^ Except for the Eastern Polesian dialect
^ Consonants are hard before /e/
^ Except for some dialects
^ In some Ukrainian dialects C/o/C can be /y~y̯e~y̯i~u̯o/
^ In some Ukrainian dialects PSl *ě can be /e̝~i̯ɛ/
^ Can be /s/ in South Russian
^ ^a ^b In some Northern Russian dialects, Proto-Slavic *c and *č have merged into one sound, variously pronounced as /t͡s, t͡sʲ, t͡ʂ, t͡ɕ/ depending on a dialect.
^ Can be /ɕ/ in Southern Russian
^ Can be /ɕt͡ɕ/, /ʂː/
^ In Russian light affrication can occur: [tˢʲ] , [dᶻʲ]
^ In some Northern Russian sub-dialects /v/ is not devoiced to /f/
^ Except for восемь "eight" and some others
^ ^a ^b Only unstressed, Church Slavonic influence
^ Stressed, unstressed is usually reduced to [ʲəj]
^ Stressed, unstressed is usually reduced to [əj]
^ In colloquial Russian, new vocative has appeared from a pure stem: мам, пап, Маш, Вань etc.
^ In the dialect of Vologda

History

When the common Old East Slavic language became separated from the ancient Slavic tongue common to all Slavs is difficult to ascertain, though in the 12th century the common language of Rus' is still referred to in contemporary writing as Slavic.^{[citation needed]}

Therefore, a crucial differentiation has to be made between the history of the East Slavic dialects and that of the literary languages employed by the Eastern Slavs. Although most ancient texts betray the dialect their author or scribe spoke, it is also clearly visible that they tried to write in a language different from their dialects and to avoid those mistakes that enable us nowadays to locate them.^{[citation needed]}

In both cases one has to keep in mind that the history of the East Slavic languages is of course a history of written texts. We do not know how the writers of the preserved texts would have spoken in everyday life.^{[citation needed]}

Influence of Church Slavonic

After the conversion of the East Slavic region to Christianity the people used service books borrowed from Bulgaria, which were written in Old Church Slavonic.^[6] The Church Slavonic language was strictly used only in text, while the colloquial language of the Bulgarians was communicated in its spoken form.^{[citation needed]}

Throughout the Middle Ages (and in some way up to the present day) there existed a duality between the Church Slavonic language used as some kind of 'higher' register (not only) in religious texts and the popular tongue used as a 'lower' register for secular texts. It has been suggested to describe this situation as diglossia, although there do exist mixed texts where it is sometimes very hard to determine why a given author used a popular or a Church Slavonic form in a given context. Church Slavonic was a major factor in the evolution of modern Russian, where there still exists a "high stratum" of words that were imported from this language.^[7]

References

^ Sussex & Cubberley 2006, pp. 79–89.
^ "Dulichenko, Aleksandr The language of Carpathian Rus': Genetic Aspects" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-06-25. Retrieved 2009-12-12.
^ "Метатеорія мовознавства. Від автора".
^ "A Map of Lexical Distances Between Europe's Languages".
^ "Worldwide map or data for linguistic distance?".
^ Sussex & Cubberley 2006, pp. 63–65.
^ Sussex & Cubberley 2006, pp. 477–478.

External links

Media related to East Slavic languages at Wikimedia Commons

[6] Except for the Polesian dialect of Brest

[7] Except for the Eastern Polesian dialect

[8] Consonants are hard before /e/

[9] Except for some dialects

[10] In some Ukrainian dialects C/o/C can be /y~y̯e~y̯i~u̯o/

[11] In some Ukrainian dialects PSl *ě can be /e̝~i̯ɛ/

[12] Can be /s/ in South Russian

[c-13] In some Northern Russian dialects, Proto-Slavic *c and *č have merged into one sound, variously pronounced as /t͡s, t͡sʲ, t͡ʂ, t͡ɕ/ depending on a dialect.

[14] Can be /ɕ/ in Southern Russian

[15] Can be /ɕt͡ɕ/, /ʂː/

[16] In Russian light affrication can occur: [tˢʲ] , [dᶻʲ]

[17] In some Northern Russian sub-dialects /v/ is not devoiced to /f/

[18] Except for восемь "eight" and some others

[chsl-19] Only unstressed, Church Slavonic influence

[20] Stressed, unstressed is usually reduced to [ʲəj]

[21] Stressed, unstressed is usually reduced to [əj]

[22] In colloquial Russian, new vocative has appeared from a pure stem: мам, пап, Маш, Вань etc.

[23] In the dialect of Vologda

[FOOTNOTESussexCubberley200679–89-1] Sussex & Cubberley 2006, pp. 79–89.

[2] "Dulichenko, Aleksandr The language of Carpathian Rus': Genetic Aspects" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-06-25. Retrieved 2009-12-12.

[3] "Метатеорія мовознавства. Від автора".

[4] "A Map of Lexical Distances Between Europe's Languages".

[5] "Worldwide map or data for linguistic distance?".

[FOOTNOTESussexCubberley200663–65-24] Sussex & Cubberley 2006, pp. 63–65.

[FOOTNOTESussexCubberley2006477–478-25] Sussex & Cubberley 2006, pp. 477–478.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[n 1]

[n 2]

[n 3]

[n 4]

[n 5]

[n 6]

[n 7]

[n 8]

[n 9]

[n 10]

[n 11]

[n 12]

[n 13]

[n 14]

[n 15]

[n 16]

[n 17]

[n 18]

[6]

[7]

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 The '''East Slavic languages''' constitute one of three regional subgroups of the [[Slavic languages]], however, by number of speakers, East Slavic languages far outnumber the [[West Slavic languages|West Slavic]] and [[South Slavic languages|South Slavic]] language families. These languages are currently spoken natively throughout [[Eastern Europe]], and eastwards to [[Siberia]] and the [[Russian Far East]], while being also spoken as a [[lingua franca]] in many regions of [[Caucasus]] and [[Central Asia]].
-The common consensus is that [[Russian language|Russian]], [[Ukrainian language|Ukrainian]] and [[Belarusian language|Belarusian]] are the existent East Slavic languages;{{sfn|Sussex|Cubberley|2006|pp=79–89}} [[Rusyn language|Rusyn]] is mostly considered as a separate language too, but some classify it as a dialect of Ukrainian.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.rusyn.org/images/1.%20Language%20of%20Carpathian%20Rus'.pdf |title=Dulichenko, Aleksandr ''The language of Carpathian Rus': Genetic Aspects''|access-date=2009-12-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130625103006/http://www.rusyn.org/images/1.%20Language%20of%20Carpathian%20Rus'.pdf |archive-date=2013-06-25 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
+The common consensus is that [[Russian language|Russian]], [[Ukrainian language|Ukrainian]] and [[Belarusian language|Belarusian]] are the existent East Slavic languages;{{sfn|Sussex|Cubberley|2006|pp=79–89}} [[Rusyn language|Rusyn]] is mostly considered as a separate language too, but some classify it as a dialect of Ukrainian.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.rusyn.org/images/1.%20Language%20of%20Carpathian%20Rus'.pdf |title=Dulichenko, Aleksandr ''The language of Carpathian Rus': Genetic Aspects''|access-date=2009-12-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130625103006/http://www.rusyn.org/images/1.%20Language%20of%20Carpathian%20Rus'.pdf |archive-date=2013-06-25 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Nowadays [[Belarusian language|Belarusian]] and [[Ukrainian language|Ukrainian]] languages are placed into a separate Central Slavic subgroup by modern scholars,<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://linguist.univ.kiev.ua/museum/book/author.html |title=Метатеорія мовознавства. Від автора }}</ref> based on their initial role in formation of [[Balto-Slavic language|Balto-Slavic]] Languages and equidistant lexical position of [[Ruthenian language|Ruthenian]] between [[West Slavic languages|West Slavic]] languages such as [[Polish language|Polish]] and East Slavic languages such as [[Russian language|Russian]].<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://bigthink.com/strange-maps/a-map-of-lexical-distances-between-europes-languages |title=A Map of Lexical Distances Between Europe’s Languages }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/17400/worldwide-map-or-data-for-linguistic-distance |title=Worldwide map or data for linguistic distance? }}</ref>
 The East Slavic languages descend from a [[proto-language|common predecessor]], the language spoken in the medieval [[Kievan Rus']] (9th to 13th centuries), the [[Old East Slavic|Rus' language]]  which later evolved into [[Ruthenian language|Ruthenian]], the language of the [[Grand Duchy of Lithuania]] (13th to 18th centuries) in the [[Dnieper]] river valley, and into [[Russian language|Russian]], the language of the [[Grand Duchy of Moscow]] (13th to 16th centuries) in the [[Volga Region|Volga]] river valley accordingly. All these languages use the [[Cyrillic script]], but with particular modifications. [[Belarusian language|Belarusian]] and [[Ukrainian language|Ukrainian]], which are descendants of [[Ruthenian language|Ruthenian]], have a tradition of using [[Latin alphabet|Latin-based alphabets]]—the [[Belarusian Latin alphabet|Belarusian Łacinka]] and [[Ukrainian Latin alphabet|Ukrainian Latin]] alphabets, respectively (also Rusyn uses Latin in some regions).{{Citation needed|date=August 2022}}

Authority control databases
International	FAST
National	France BnF data Germany Israel United States Czech Republic
Other	IdRef