Jump to content

Talk:Greta Thunberg: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 48: Line 48:
I know this is a trivial issue, but polishing the article a bit wouldn't hurt. Paulmlieberman ([[User talk:Paulmlieberman#top|talk]]) 14:21, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
I know this is a trivial issue, but polishing the article a bit wouldn't hurt. Paulmlieberman ([[User talk:Paulmlieberman#top|talk]]) 14:21, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Hola, como estas. Ok peace out sisters <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/100.37.229.134|100.37.229.134]] ([[User talk:100.37.229.134#top|talk]]) 14:36, 15 December 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Hola, como estas. Ok peace out sisters <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/100.37.229.134|100.37.229.134]] ([[User talk:100.37.229.134#top|talk]]) 14:36, 15 December 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:"sisters"? [[Special:Contributions/81.154.172.180|81.154.172.180]] ([[User talk:81.154.172.180|talk]]) 00:12, 3 March 2021 (UTC)


== Typo in the section Position on climate change ==
== Typo in the section Position on climate change ==

Revision as of 00:12, 3 March 2021

Template:Vital article



Should we move the first two citations in the infobox?

Somebody didn't like the way Greta's full name looked in the infobox, so they inserted an HTML line break before her last name. IMHO, that is a *bad thing*, so I looked for another way to force the infobox to be wider so the name would fit together properly. It's inside a nowrap template, so why did it wrap? I tried several solutions; none worked. Then I noticed that the start of the first of two (not particularly relevant) citations butted up directly against "Thunberg". I inserted a space, and now it looks fine! But, should those citations be there, or after her full name in the article lede, or elsewhere or not in the article at all? I know this is a trivial issue, but polishing the article a bit wouldn't hurt. Paulmlieberman (talk) 14:21, 21 October 2020 (UTC) Hola, como estas. Ok peace out sisters — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.37.229.134 (talk) 14:36, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"sisters"? 81.154.172.180 (talk) 00:12, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Typo in the section Position on climate change

There is a typo in second para in the quote "... unimaginable amounts of mone.y" which should be replaced by "... money." Garlicbeaver (talk) 14:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Garlicbeaver, done, thank you. GirthSummit (blether) 14:24, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 4 February 2021

In the section titled: "Social media activism" The following sentence: "Thunberg has also spoken out in support of the ongoing 2020–2021 Indian farmers' protest, in a Tweet.[43]" needs update due to the backlash and impact it created in India.

Proposed Addition : "In one of her tweets she had linked a google doc that guided and encourage protesters in India. [1] This resulted in immediate backlash and as a result Thunberg deleted that tweet. India Government filed FIR report against the authors of this document for inciting violence and condemned Greta Thunberg for siding with them." [2]

Reason: This is one of the top media stories all over India and even in Global Media such as BBC right now. The current wikipedia entry is lacking complete information about the tweets and backlash that need to be added to the page for factual reasons.

Cybersj (talk) 22:05, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. That doesn't look like a reliable source. You also need to elaborate on 1. what was in the Google doc 2. why there was "immediate backlash".  Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 00:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ganbaruby, Sure thing, I've updated the text with more information and also added 3 different references major news outlets corroborating the story.
Proposed Addition : "In one of her tweets she shared a link to a Google document that had several resources to mobilise people against the farm laws. The document in Thunberg's tweet showed details about January 26 protests and other street protests. The screenshots of the documents were widely shared on social media. [3] This resulted in immediate backlash and as a result Thunberg deleted that tweet. Delhi Police filed FIR against the authors of the document under Section 153A (promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race) and Section 120B (criminal conspiracy), India Today reported on Thursday." [4] [5][6] Cybersj (talk) 07:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like someone else has been able to update the whole story on her wikipedia page so this change is no longer needed. Cybersj (talk) 22:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Goel Sharma, Swati. "Twitter". https://www.twitter.com. Twitter. Retrieved 4 February 2021. {{cite web}}: External link in |website= (help)
  2. ^ Madaik, Devyani (4 February 2021). "All About Greta Thunberg's Toolkit On Farmers' Protest". thelogicalindian.com. Retrieved 4 February 2021.
  3. ^ Goel Sharma, Swati. "Twitter". https://www.twitter.com. Twitter. Retrieved 4 February 2021. {{cite web}}: External link in |website= (help)
  4. ^ Haider, Tanseem; Mishra, Himanshu. "Delhi Police files FIR on farmers' protest 'toolkit' tweeted by Greta Thunberg". India Today. Retrieved 5 February 2021.
  5. ^ Times, Now. "Greta Thunberg tweets again, releases 'tool kit' on farmers' stir | International - Times of India Videos". The Times of India. The Times of India. Retrieved 5 February 2021.
  6. ^ Brown, Lee (4 February 2021). "Greta Thunberg sparks criminal conspiracy probe in India with accidental tweet". New York Post. Retrieved 5 February 2021.

Delhi police filed FIR on her farmer's protest toolkit tweet.

Please mention that Delhi police filed GIR on her farmer toolkit tweet. Source Rizosome (talk) 03:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rizosome: Not directly related to her. Probe Not Against Greta Thunberg: Police on "Sedition" FIR For "Toolkit"

Anonymous quotations for criticism

In the Greta Thunberg § Social media activism section, quotes from anonymous spokespersons in The Times of India (RSP entry) are being used for criticism of Thunberg in relation to her tweets about the 2020–2021 Indian farmers' protest. Since Thunberg is a living person, the paragraph should be rephrased to avoid the use of anonymous quotes, per WP:BLPGOSSIP. — Newslinger talk 17:13, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This was resolved in Special:Diff/1005777885. — Newslinger talk 03:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]