User talk:Earthoceans: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:36, 29 August 2021

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chronogenetics.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pol430 talk to me 19:16, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apartheid

Please read and if necessary improve on the article as written, instead of adding your own section - I will revert it as it stands at the moment. Wizzy…☎

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chronogenetics concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chronogenetics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:18, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Chronogenetics (September 4)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chronogenetics.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Lugia2453 (talk) 22:45, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chronogenetics (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chronogenetics.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t) Josve05a (c) 22:18, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Earthoceans, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Speedy deletion nomination of AFRICA UNITE PARTY

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on AFRICA UNITE PARTY, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:18, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your query at the Articles for Creation help desk

Hello Earthoceans, I have responded to your queries in the section Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#Refusal of articles (from User:Earthoceans). If anything else is unclear or you have further queries about the articles you're having trouble with, please post in that section. Please do not create a new section for each time you comment, and please remember to sign your comments. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 11:16, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to AFRICA UNITE PARTY may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

(Also Known as “The Africa Unite Movement” /A.U.M. or A.U.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:11, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of AFRICA UNITE PARTY

Hello Earthoceans,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged AFRICA UNITE PARTY for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 21:36, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Excitable accusations of racism will not help you. You need to follow our rules if you want your article to stand

Article titles should not be fully capitalised, that's just spammy
You did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines.
it should be written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
WE HAVE GIVEN YOU THE FACTS ONLY.— Who is "we"? You should not be editing on behalf of an organisation

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:21, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chronogenetics (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Chronogenetics.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 04:21, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 24 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Africa unite party page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:39, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chronogenetics concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chronogenetics, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chronogenetics

Hello Earthoceans. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Chronogenetics".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chronogenetics}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rainbow Gathering edits

Assertion unverified by africauniteparty.org; Facebook is not a reliable source; please see WP:LINKSTOAVOID. Peaceray (talk) 16:29, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, I'm Home Lander. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sagging (fashion)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Home Lander (talk) 02:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sagging (fashion). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Home Lander (talk) 02:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sagging (fashion), you may be blocked from editing. Home Lander (talk) 02:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, I'm Ladislav Mecir. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Blockchain have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

Nomination of Africa Unite Party for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Africa Unite Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Africa Unite Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — kashmīrī ^TALK 21:12, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Africa Unite Party as to why the article was deleted. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Opposites Attract ‖ 18:26, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Richard Amerike, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 08:32, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to BitChute, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Djm-leighpark (talk) 12:43, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

this us the problem if where wikipedia is going. it's no longer credible. bitshute is not a right wing organisation. by aligning yrself with big tech u rvsimply selling yrself out to objectivity. be in the Vortex. truth is truth no.matter what Earthoceans (talk) 11:40, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello, I'm CorbieVreccan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Legend of the Rainbow Warriors, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave a message on article talk. There are major factual errors in what you wrote, but it's unclear if you are aware of how inaccurate what you added is. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 18:32, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Earthoceans! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 18:36, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 18:33, 29 August 2021 edit CorbieVreccan (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 28,682 edits →August 2021: article talk is better. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:36, 29 August 2021 edit undo CorbieVreccan (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 28,682 edits Notice: Incorrect use of minor edits check box. Tag: Twinkle Next edit →
Line 157:		Line 157:

	[[File:Information.svg\|25px\|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:CorbieVreccan\|CorbieVreccan]]. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, [[:Legend of the Rainbow Warriors]], but you didn't provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources\|reliable source]]. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to [[Wikipedia:Citing sources\|include a citation]] and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at [[Help:Referencing for beginners\|referencing for beginners]]. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave a message on article talk. ''There are major factual errors in what you wrote, but it's unclear if you are aware of how inaccurate what you added is.'' <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> - [[User:CorbieVreccan\|<span style="color: #660099;"><strong>CorbieVreccan</strong></span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:CorbieVreccan\|☊]]</sup> [[WP:SPIDER\|☼]] 18:32, 29 August 2021 (UTC)		[[File:Information.svg\|25px\|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:CorbieVreccan\|CorbieVreccan]]. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, [[:Legend of the Rainbow Warriors]], but you didn't provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources\|reliable source]]. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to [[Wikipedia:Citing sources\|include a citation]] and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at [[Help:Referencing for beginners\|referencing for beginners]]. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave a message on article talk. ''There are major factual errors in what you wrote, but it's unclear if you are aware of how inaccurate what you added is.'' <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> - [[User:CorbieVreccan\|<span style="color: #660099;"><strong>CorbieVreccan</strong></span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:CorbieVreccan\|☊]]</sup> [[WP:SPIDER\|☼]] 18:32, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

			[[File:Information.svg\|25px\|alt=Information icon]] Hi Earthoceans! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia{{Snd}} it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as [[typographical error\|typo corrections]] or reverting obvious [[Wikipedia:Vandalism\|vandalism]]. Any edit that changes the ''meaning'' of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see [[Help:Minor edit]] for more information. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-minor --> - [[User:CorbieVreccan\|<span style="color: #660099;"><strong>CorbieVreccan</strong></span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:CorbieVreccan\|☊]]</sup> [[WP:SPIDER\|☼]] 18:36, 29 August 2021 (UTC)