Jump to content

User talk:Lallint: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m →‎What were you thinking?: fix category link
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
Line 83: Line 83:
:I'm curious, what pages are you planning on editing? Will you continue to make edits [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fram&diff=prev&oldid=1073694660 like these] and create pages like [[User:Lallint/templates/Userboxes/CBT]], [[:Category:Ironic Afds]], [[Template:HORRIBLEPAGES]], [[Wikipedia:Horrible articles]] etc.? [[User:Moneytrees|Moneytrees]]<sup>[[User talk:Moneytrees|Talk🏝️]]</sup> 21:53, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
:I'm curious, what pages are you planning on editing? Will you continue to make edits [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fram&diff=prev&oldid=1073694660 like these] and create pages like [[User:Lallint/templates/Userboxes/CBT]], [[:Category:Ironic Afds]], [[Template:HORRIBLEPAGES]], [[Wikipedia:Horrible articles]] etc.? [[User:Moneytrees|Moneytrees]]<sup>[[User talk:Moneytrees|Talk🏝️]]</sup> 21:53, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
::I am active on Simplewiki and you can check my contributions there, I will mostly do contributions similar to those <span style="background:#202122;font-family:'Lato';font-weight:bold;padding:4px 3px 3px">[[User:Lallint|<span style="color:#90EE90">Lallint</span>]]<span style="color:#FF8200">⟫⟫⟫</span>[[User talk:Lallint|<span style="color:#45B1E8">Talk</span>]] </span> 21:56, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
::I am active on Simplewiki and you can check my contributions there, I will mostly do contributions similar to those <span style="background:#202122;font-family:'Lato';font-weight:bold;padding:4px 3px 3px">[[User:Lallint|<span style="color:#90EE90">Lallint</span>]]<span style="color:#FF8200">⟫⟫⟫</span>[[User talk:Lallint|<span style="color:#45B1E8">Talk</span>]] </span> 21:56, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Horrible Articles and Ironic Afds both were attempts at humor, Horrible Articles was stolen by somebody with no trace of my edits to it and is now an April Fools article (despite having been written in February), so it was clearly a good contribution to the site <span style="background:#202122;font-family:'Lato';font-weight:bold;padding:4px 3px 3px">[[User:Lallint|<span style="color:#90EE90">Lallint</span>]]<span style="color:#FF8200">⟫⟫⟫</span>[[User talk:Lallint|<span style="color:#45B1E8">Talk</span>]] </span> 17:06, 13 April 2022 (UTC)


==Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!==
==Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!==

Revision as of 17:06, 13 April 2022

MainTalkContributionsPagesSandbox
Teahouse logo
Hello, Lallint! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Timeline of Watertown, New York has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Overkill for this smallish town. The main elements are included in the "history" section of the Watertown article, the remainder is trivia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:04, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just out of curiosity, I noticed you put a file PROD on your own image. I'm just double-checking that this was intentional, and if so I will proceed with deleting it per WP:G7. Primefac (talk) 08:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it was intentional, I took the original logo and turned it into an svg because this was before they told you specifically not to do that Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 12:35, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Information icon Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use your sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:05, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody had suggested the edit be made in the talk page in early 2021 but nobody ever said anything so I figured I might as well put it there, it wasn't in bad faith though I just thought there should be at least one article on Wikipedia with humor in it Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 17:08, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Whyyyyyyy after a block and thorough discussion for doing similar things? And was the edit summary of Special:Diff/1075443651 really necessary?
The thing is, you either genuinely thought this was completely unproblematic (which then is a problem by itself), or you've been intentionally disruptive.
I have one single simple wish: Please stop mixing good-faith edits and intentional disruption on the same platform. Throw the garbage at Fandom or something. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:20, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Disclaimer: The last sentence is not a serious suggestion, and I'll now de-watchlist this page. Its watchlist notifications haven't benefited either of us. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:26, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm a little bit too tired to think of a good message that can accurately and professionally summarize my thoughts without going into intricate detail like I'm writing a FA or mailing a letter to the president of the united states so I'll just say this:
I did think it was problematic but I figured that it would be fun to bring back the less professional and less serious Wikipedia of 2008 when people could ask how the robbers in home alone didn't die after having an iron dropped on them (true story) in just a single page, but I guess I wasn't thinking right because sometimes im smart and sometimes im like a second grader trying to understand Pre-Economics, though there is one bit of humor that is still in an article that I find funny is the way I worded Historic people in Watertowns page. I'm glad that you are not too professional though and thanks for that. Also I actually started off editing on fandom (better examples being Special Miracle Tonic on Red Dead Wiki and Human Beach on Hazbin Hotel wiki under the username Seana74), which I guess is a tiny bit funny. One thing I have been meaning to tell people though is that the reason why I was so dazed and confused and stupid when I started off is because the most professional wording that I ever did was on Fandom and this website I made.Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 01:21, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Ramspeck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democrat. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Lallint! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 01:32, Monday, March 7, 2022 (UTC)

What were you thinking?

Why are you welcoming an editor who was blocked in 2007 who's only edit was to post this atrocious comment at AN? Giving the history of this account and your continued inexplicable behaviour, I'm now convinced you're either openly trolling or aren't capable of editing productively in a consistent manner.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:19, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how that happened but I reverted it, I don't know how you can accidentally welcome a user but I clearly somehow managed to do it Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 22:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruption either through outright trolling or a lack of competence regarding what is expected when editing an open and collaborative project. Given your oh-so-humerous userbox, its clear that you really think this is a platform for your personal amusement. If you can convince an admin otherwise, you can be unblocked.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I endorse this block, based on previous discussions and the mentioned userbox. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I seriously didn't mean to do that, I'm sorry about it and I don't want it to be taken as I endorse his actions Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 22:38, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And I'm not saying that as some stupid way to taunt you or something I really am sorry if it seemed like I supported the crappy things that he said Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 22:50, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lallint it would probably be best if you take a break from Wikipedia for a few weeks and think about what you want to do here on Wikipedia. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:31, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's what I was thinking too Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 17:19, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
While humor isn't always inappropriate here on Wikipedia, too much of it is. In the past (when I was very new to editing) I often made inappropriate, joke comments at WP:ANI, which I was rightfully scolded for. I eventually just decided to unwatch ANI partially because it's a drama board, and partly so I wouldn't be tempted to continue to make joke comments. Nowadays I will occasionally make joke comments, however only when it's appropriate (and often appended with the template {{jokes}} Which is an inline template for marking the preceding comment as a joike), however I mainly focus on making constructive, helpful edits. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:41, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ponyo: You forgot to block my second account, User:Lallint2 Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 18:37, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done -- TNT (talk • she/her) 18:43, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks👍[Joke] Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 22:51, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you had intended to use that account to evade your block that would've lowered the chances of you getting unblocked. Just so you know. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 23:16, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well I didn't so that's good Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 23:51, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lallint (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am aware that the edits that I made were not allowed on Wikipedia and would like to be able to resume constructive and helpful edits. I did not intend for disruptive editing but looking back it is obvious that it was and I know now what is and is not acceptable on Wikipedia. Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 02:12, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You say that you knew the edits you made were not allowed but also that you didn't intend to edit disruptively; both of these statements cannot be true at the same time. Either you knew the edits were inappropriate and did them anyway, or you didn't know and were unknowingly disruptive. Either way, I concur with the comment below that you need to mature more as a person and editor before requesting unblock again. 331dot (talk) 07:09, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What I meant was I was unaware at the time of doing the edits that they were disruptive but looking back I realize that it was Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 10:53 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Lallint, this is your second block, and you couldn't make it through your first one-week block without violating its spirit. You were blocked again for clearly not getting the reasoning behind your original block. Now you are asking to be unblocked 5 days into your second block? You clearly are capable of making constructive contributions, but any of this other crap negates any value those contributions have. I have been quietly observing your history since our first interaction, and I just think you currently lack the necessary maturity to contribute here. That's not going to come in 5 days. IMHO, you need to let your block stand for months at minimum, go do some other stuff for a while, and perhaps come back to Wikipedia in the future. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:21, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Could you link our first interaction? Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 17:31, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just letting you guys know, I have resumed activity on Simplewiki and have been making good contributions there.--Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 17:31, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Our first interaction was at User_talk:Lallint/Old#Non-admin_closure. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:20, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Lallint (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

After 32 days I have re-thought how I would like to approach this site, as more of as being a contributor to a project than a hobby. I was wrong to have been making inappropriate comments, and even going so far to create a redirect titled "Rfd me if u gay". That was ridiculous, and I promise that things like that are never going to happen again. I also have an alternative account, Lallint2, that I was aware of and did not use it for sockpuppetry or vandalism.--Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 20:40, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=After 32 days I have re-thought how I would like to approach this site, as more of as being a contributor to a project than a hobby. I was wrong to have been making inappropriate comments, and even going so far to create a redirect titled "[[Rfd me if u gay]]". That was ridiculous, and I promise that things like that are never going to happen again. I also have an alternative account, Lallint2, that I was aware of and did not use it for sockpuppetry or vandalism.--<span style="background:#202122;font-family:'Lato';font-weight:bold;padding:4px 3px 3px">[[User:Lallint|<span style="color:#90EE90">Lallint</span>]]<span style="color:#FF8200">⟫⟫⟫</span>[[User talk:Lallint|<span style="color:#45B1E8">Talk</span>]] </span> 20:40, 8 April 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=After 32 days I have re-thought how I would like to approach this site, as more of as being a contributor to a project than a hobby. I was wrong to have been making inappropriate comments, and even going so far to create a redirect titled "[[Rfd me if u gay]]". That was ridiculous, and I promise that things like that are never going to happen again. I also have an alternative account, Lallint2, that I was aware of and did not use it for sockpuppetry or vandalism.--<span style="background:#202122;font-family:'Lato';font-weight:bold;padding:4px 3px 3px">[[User:Lallint|<span style="color:#90EE90">Lallint</span>]]<span style="color:#FF8200">⟫⟫⟫</span>[[User talk:Lallint|<span style="color:#45B1E8">Talk</span>]] </span> 20:40, 8 April 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=After 32 days I have re-thought how I would like to approach this site, as more of as being a contributor to a project than a hobby. I was wrong to have been making inappropriate comments, and even going so far to create a redirect titled "[[Rfd me if u gay]]". That was ridiculous, and I promise that things like that are never going to happen again. I also have an alternative account, Lallint2, that I was aware of and did not use it for sockpuppetry or vandalism.--<span style="background:#202122;font-family:'Lato';font-weight:bold;padding:4px 3px 3px">[[User:Lallint|<span style="color:#90EE90">Lallint</span>]]<span style="color:#FF8200">⟫⟫⟫</span>[[User talk:Lallint|<span style="color:#45B1E8">Talk</span>]] </span> 20:40, 8 April 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
What were your plans for the account Xoiwiki ? SQLQuery Me! 19:32, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I created the account while with my cousin who wanted to make edits to Wikipedia after he saw that I was a big contributor (in his eyes), but he only used it once or twice to revert vandalism then never used it again--Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 19:43, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This was during my seven day block in February Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 19:44, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm curious, what pages are you planning on editing? Will you continue to make edits like these and create pages like User:Lallint/templates/Userboxes/CBT, Category:Ironic Afds, Template:HORRIBLEPAGES, Wikipedia:Horrible articles etc.? MoneytreesTalk🏝️ 21:53, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am active on Simplewiki and you can check my contributions there, I will mostly do contributions similar to those Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 21:56, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Horrible Articles and Ironic Afds both were attempts at humor, Horrible Articles was stolen by somebody with no trace of my edits to it and is now an April Fools article (despite having been written in February), so it was clearly a good contribution to the site Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 17:06, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Lallint! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:35, Saturday, March 19, 2022 (UTC)