User talk:Herpetogenesis/Archive 1

Herpetogenesis, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Herpetogenesis! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Herpetogenesis! Thank you for your contributions. I am ThatMontrealIP and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! ThatMontrealIP (talk) 14:46, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

The above is a bit generic, but welcome!ThatMontrealIP (talk) 14:47, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, chocolate chip cookies from Montreal? I'd take those any day! HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 14:49, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Twinkle

Hi Herpetogenesis! Following the discussion on the COI noticeboard talk, I wanted to point you at a really useful tool, Twinkle. Among its many features, it helps you quickly tag pages for deletion (speedy deletion, proposed deletion, or deletion discussion) if you come across promotion. Of course, you should make sure to familiarize yourself with the applicable policies before using it, but I make extensive use of it. We're glad to have you here, and please feel free to ask me (or any of the other editors who chimed in on the discussion) if you have any other questions or need advice. creffett (talk) 01:18, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

(by talk reader) To follow that, Herpetogenesis, you are close to meeting the qualifications for our countervandalism academy, which would teach you not only about Twinkle, Huggle, and AWB but the specific Wikipedia policies and guidelines you need to know when dealing with the ne'er-do-wells that inhabit Wikipedia. The education does a lot more to guide your tool usage. Knowing which noticeboard to go to and when is more important than just the buttonology of a semi-automated interface. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:17, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 07:12, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

May 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages, as you did at Wikiletters, you may be blocked from editing. You are not supposed to remove them. It will be done by an administrator. ~Amkgp ✉ 08:22, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Wrong template? I was doing routine maintenance and came across a random article that didn't immediately look like spam. I was actually about to send it to AfD. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 11:30, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) (Hi Herpetogenesis!) Amkgp: actually, WP:CSD says that removal of a CSD template by editors other than the page creator is fair game: If an editor other than the creator removes a speedy deletion tag in good faith, it should be taken as a sign that the deletion is not uncontroversial and another deletion process should be used. I'd expect the removing editor to be reasonably uninvolved (that is, if they contributed to the page too I'd expect them to contest the deletion), but it's absolutely allowed. creffett (talk) 12:43, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Creffett, OK I should have added 'editors' too in the notice. Thanks for pointing out the missing point. I posted the notice as I found very less edits history from Herpetogenesis to go ahead and revert a CSD, which made me suspicious.

Dear Herpetogenesis pardon if you felt bad about it. I understand it was done in good faith but people tend to escape CSD many times by doing such acts. So I had to send a warning as per procedure.

Regarding template, I should have used a custom made than the one available in Twinkle. I have realized that it was for creators only which I posted for you. ~Amkgp ✉ 18:19, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Welcoming users

Please don't continue to template new accounts that have not made any edits at all. There are a number of reasons why we don't do this and it is expressly noted that the templates should not be used for zero edit accounts at Wikipedia:Welcoming committee.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:50, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

@Ponyo: Got it, that makes sense now. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 15:17, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Article

Good written with well source Md Mahfuzur Rahman Bsl (talk) 00:18, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

@Md Mahfuzur Rahman Bsl: No. Just no. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 15:17, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Herpetogenesis, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 14:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Herpetogenesis. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:12, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you for reviewing the Sam Maggs page!

Death Harpie (talk) 03:25, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi bro

Thank you too my bro, I like Greece and people Greece very much! But I want to ask you one question, Are the tribe of Cadusii belong Scythian ? or are Cadusii tribe of Scythian ? Thank you very much for you help bro! FaradzhoffEma (talk) 21:10, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

@FaradzhoffEma: They may or may not be. We can't know for sure. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 04:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Hey Herpetogenesis

In response to your message regarding the article "Bhartiya City( company)" .No I am not getting paid by the employer as of now.Do we have the option to do that as well?

Currently I just wrote this because I mostly write and edit on Real Estate Articles.Do you suggest any changes? :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by VidhantMonga03 (talk • contribs) 08:46, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Herpetogenesis. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:32, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Review Response

Hello. In response to your message regarding the article "Gideon Ikhine(individual)" .No I am not getting paid by the employer.

Currently I just wrote this because I am trying to get acqainted with the wikipedia space and i intend to write and edit on local political Articles. I have also made all changes and edit to the articles as i request that the article be approved. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidchijioke10 (talk • contribs) 17:44, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

@Davidchijioke10: It is unambiguous self-promotion and advertising that has been deleted before, plain and simple. You very clearly have a conflict of interest involved. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 17:51, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

@Herpetogenesis . I sincerely apologize for the inconveniences caused. Proper edits and changes have been made to the article according to wikipedia guidelines. I am also open to any contributions you might want to make about it. Iis there a way i can make more ammends ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidchijioke10 (talk • contribs) 17:58, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

@Davidchijioke10: No problem. Declare paid editing per WP:PAID and submit through WP:AFC, and you will be fine. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 18:01, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello. I just completed that. Please Kindly confirm. Thank you so much for your patience

Please what other next steps can i implement ?

@Davidchijioke10: It's at Draft:Gideon Ikhine. Now you can improve the draft as you'd like. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 18:51, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Great ! Thank you so much — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidchijioke10 (talk • contribs) 19:06, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

@Davidchijioke10: You will also need to address the copyright issue. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 19:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you so much @Herpetogenesis. Your contribution are of immense help. it however appears that the page was deleted already as I cant find the draft at the link above. Please can you look into it or am i required to start all over again ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidchijioke10 (talk • contribs) 19:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

@Davidchijioke10: Another user just deleted it because of the copyright issue. You can start the draft again after making sure the content is not copied and pasted from anywhere else. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 19:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed

Hello, Herpetogenesis

Thank you for creating Mental health in Singapore.

User:Herpetogenesis, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice encyclopedic overview!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Herpetogenesis}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 14:14, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

A7 on Lara Abrash

Hello Herpetogenesis -- I've declined your A7 speedy on Lara Abrash because there were clear claims in the article. Please be more careful in future! Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 08:18, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello Herpetogenesis -- I've declined your A7 speedy on Lara Abrash because there were clear claims in the article. Please be more careful in future! Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 08:18, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Article re-review request for Draft:Pasbaan-e-adab

@Herpetogenesis:Thanks for the review. Based on the feedback, I have rephrased and neutralized the content in introduction and more.

@Herpetogenesis:Furthermore, the organisation has been often covered and referred by the reputed Indian publications (also added in reference) like Business Standard, Outlook (Indian magazine), Business Today (India). That easily makes it worthwhile of getting published on the website. Also, there is very similar organisation in India called Rekhta (website) already published on Wiki. Hence, I request you to re-consider publication request. Do let me know if needs re-writing for specific points. I will be happy to oblige. ---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Umairsy (talk • contribs) 14:32, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Umair (talk) 20:03, 27 November 2020 (IST)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Request on 03:48:01, 30 November 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by

• A.bo (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Guanxing Ceramics (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, can you clarify the differences between Porcelanosa, Ceramiche Refin and RAK ceramics pages?

A.bo ([[User talk:|talk]]) 03:48, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

Hello Herpetogenesis,

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	DannyS712 bot III (talk)	67,552	Patrol Page Curation
2	Rosguill (talk)	63,821	Patrol Page Curation
3	John B123 (talk)	21,697	Patrol Page Curation
4	Onel5969 (talk)	19,879	Patrol Page Curation
5	JTtheOG (talk)	12,901	Patrol Page Curation
6	Mcampany (talk)	9,103	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	6,401	Patrol Page Curation
8	Mccapra (talk)	4,918	Patrol Page Curation
9	Hughesdarren (talk)	4,520	Patrol Page Curation
10	Utopes (talk)	3,958	Patrol Page Curation

Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Concerning deletion of page Affliction Networks

Hi, it seems you were right about the page lacking valid references.. The page has been updated to contain independent valid resources.. I urge you to please re-read the article and re-consider your vote. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LoggingOnto (talk • contribs) 16:31, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

@LoggingOnto: I'm also voting to delete it because it's unambiguous self-promotion and advertising. Wikipedia is not an online yellow page directory. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 22:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

@Herpetogenesis: Just letting you know I have nothing to do with the game, company, or anything of that sort so it's not "self advertising". I am simply a fan of the game but I have not been paid or asked to do this. You would have seen this if you read the Talk page of the deletion page.

Template on the page "Habibur-Rahman Shakir"

Hello! If i am not mistaken, you added a template to Shakir's page (that i created) which said the following: "This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification." I agree that the page itself needs more information (which is why i added the stub -tag), but what i don't understand is, why does the template say "living person"? Shakir died in 1975, as it says on the page. If i misunderstood something, i apologize. Muokkaus55 (talk) 16:11, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

An angel for you

Hi, Herpetogenesis! Thank you for reviewing the St Paul's Lisbon page!

Uriel1022 (talk) 03:39, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

A trout for you

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Just a friendly reminder to check for copyvio prior to draftify-ing things. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 17:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

@Zppix: Sure thing! A lot of COI submissions have blatant copyvio problems. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 17:23, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Herpetogenesis:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 2900 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021

New Page Review queue September 2021

Hello Herpetogenesis,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

---

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

video sorcery!

I'll go you one better --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:10, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Client-facing

Hi, I removed the personal essay style and rewrote the article in a encyclopedic style, please review Client-facing, thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mruanova (talk • contribs) 16:45, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

I’m literally laughing and tearing up

I just read Wikipedia:No sorcery threats pedantically and I laughed uncontrollably. I don’t see it as an attack on my fellow Nigerians, it’s a humorous essay after all. You do possess a healthy sense of humor. Furthermore I see you have barely 2000 edits and possess both Autopatrol and NPR and have only been here for two years, all I can say you are a genius and a prodigy please if you have any questions don’t forget to ask me be it wiki related or not, I’m happy to see a young prodigy and even more happy to watch them grow. Thanks once again for that essay, it really cheered me up. Celestina007 (talk) 18:52, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021 backlog drive

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. (t · c) buidhe 01:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Re- I have sent you a note about a page you started

I didn't really know how to reply to your message on my talk page, so I'm replying here instead. Thanks, I try to put my best effort, especially in finding sources for historcal articles. I always create & edit articles under the topic of Indian history. And do you like my username? 😀 Pls I dank memer (talk) 15:00, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed

Hello, Herpetogenesis

Thank you for creating Astolfo's rail.

User:Herpetogenesis, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Great work! Quite an interesting extinct bird.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Herpetogenesis}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 11:02, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

• AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
• The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Polynomials calculating sums of powers of arithmetic progressions

Hi — Can you possibly provide a little more insight into why you thought it was a good idea to promote Polynomials calculating sums of powers of arithmetic progressions from draft space to a new article when it had AFC comments from three separate editors all concluding that it should not be a separate article? —David Eppstein (talk) 22:35, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

@David Eppstein: It looks like a valid topic to me, but I took a closer look at their comments and think it's a better idea to merge it into Faulhaber's formula instead. Thanks for bringing this up. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 16:38, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Delete stub "Convent and church of San Francisco, Pontevedra": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convent_and_church_of_San_Francisco,_Pontevedra

Hello Herpetogenesis, Yesterday I made the translation from French of the article "Convent and church of Saint Francis, Pontevedra" (English name) that you reviewed, to expand a stub that was on Wikipedia that consisted of a few lines. The thing is that the stub is still on Wikipedia with the name "Convent and church of San Francisco, Pontevedra": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convent_and_church_of_San_Francisco,_Pontevedra and it is necessary to delete it since the other page created is the one that is complete and with all the references. After the necessary check, could you delete this page with the stub https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convent_and_church_of_San_Francisco,_Pontevedra, please? Thank you very much in advance Kind regards --MJSB73MP (talk) 10:18, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

@MJSB73MP: Convent and church of San Francisco, Pontevedra has now been redirected to Convent and church of Saint Francis, Pontevedra. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 22:58, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you very much! MJSB73MP (talk) 10:02, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

i have added cite in Arshad jamal siqqiui

please check and see to it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pushhkar (talk • contribs) 08:47, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

@Pushhkar: WP:CIR. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 03:41, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Request on 16:13:42, 12 May 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Baardheere

• Baardheere (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:SIDAM (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Validity of above statement, the current "About' section of the Somali National University is exactly a copy of what I and other had recorded on Wikipedia 12 years ago. The case would be the same for Lafole University, Somalia's teacher training university is yet to be rescued from 1991 destructions. Baardheere (talk) 16:13, 12 May 2022 (UTC)