Jump to content

User talk:Second Skin: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 255: Line 255:


Unless you can provide such a source (which you won't be able to), stop reverting my sourced edits. [[User:Equilibrial|Equilibrial]] ([[User talk:Equilibrial|talk]]) 02:43, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Unless you can provide such a source (which you won't be able to), stop reverting my sourced edits. [[User:Equilibrial|Equilibrial]] ([[User talk:Equilibrial|talk]]) 02:43, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

:: I just realized that you also changed the explanatory note! Unbelievable. Why are you actively engaging in source distortion? I will report you unless you stop this nonsense. [[User:Equilibrial|Equilibrial]] ([[User talk:Equilibrial|talk]]) 02:48, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:48, 24 August 2022

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Second Skin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seth Putnam as VJ member

Do you have a scan of the Resistance interview in which Seth allegedly admits to being a member of Vaginal Jesus? Heepman1997 (talk) 13:57, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I dont, but theres this which proves the interview was indeed real and him admitting he was a member did happen Second Skin (talk) 06:10, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong incident. Read a few paragraphs more. It is not censored. --SVTCobra (talk) 01:26, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

The IMDb is not a reliable source. Please stop adding content from the IMDb to Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:18, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Progressive death metal

Information icon Please do not revert back a previous reversion, as you did at technical death metal, without helping to resolve the dispute on the talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle and take this opportunity to refer to the ongoing discussion. ABC paulista (talk) 13:02, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Information icon Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to In Vogue, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:18, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nattramn: Revision as of 05:25, 1 March 2017 -- source for medical condition = personality disorder

Hi. Do you have any reliable source for Nattramn having a personality disorder? When searching for information it looks like all data that exists is pure speculation. What is your stance on the reliability of the information about this person/entity/group having a personality disorder? Ελλίντερεστ (talk) 15:07, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Unspoken King, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chronicles of Chaos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Information icon Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to 40 Below Summer, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. I call the big one bitey (talk) 05:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war at Infant Annihilator

Please take a minute to take a look at the opening sentence of articles such as Napalm Death, Arch Enemy and Cradle of Filth – and research the nationalities of their members – to see and learn about the standard procedure on WP about this topic; before initiating a nonsensical edit war. I wish you to have a fruitful day. --Concus Cretus (talk) 05:05, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Timelines and lineups

please create the timeline and update the lineups of the bands House vs. Hurricane, Royal Coda, Sianvar, Secret Band, Nova Charisma (with all the info of this new band), Norma Jean (band), Set Your Goals (band), Bloodline Severed, Wolves at the Gate (band) and Dream On, Dreamer with new additional and correct info — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.34.81.214 (talk) 18:12, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why would I want to do that? I don’t care for any of those bands and I never mess with timeline stuff either Second Skin (talk) 18:49, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind leaving a comment about the genre edits you have previously made on this band's page to Talk:Wristmeetrazor? Thank you.

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alexis S.F. Marshall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Providence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:08, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you recently removed content from Society's Finest without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The link is piped. Feel free to discuss on the article's talk page. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:24, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wow you sure showed him, that genre isnt even on the page anymore
Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chubbles (talk) 15:33, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A Wonderful Life (Mushroomhead album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Title track (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pass out of Existence

Hello.

I wanna explain to you about "metalcore" genre addition at this page

20:32, 14 June 2020‎ Second Skin (talk|contribs‎) 7,034 bytes -146‎ (unreliable source. also i really doubt that nu metal book has any sort of supposed indication for that genre)

As I understand, the "Unreliable source" was said about MetalStorm ref and you removed "metalcore".

Later I returned that ref, because Metal storm is a reliable source. I'm sorry if I misunderstood.

If you have a some questions, you can discuss it at my talk page. Thanks

I believe i was talking about the “groove metal”‘inclusion which was some kind of book (something that couldn’t be verified). Second Skin (talk) 06:10, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi Whould you mind "Miscellany for Deletion" of a page titled Alexander Muise, it got some disturbing stuff you want to look into that DOES NOT fit Wikipedia standards. --Alemui12 (talk) 23:21, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Devourment

My dude, Devourment us trying to edit our page with a current professional photo instead of a weird candid from 4 years ago and you keep reverting it. Can we work together on this and get our information current? Buriedintheback (talk) 08:13, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That photograph is a copyrighted work credited to Paul Mosely, and yet there has never been a successful license applied to show that the upload was authorized from the author. See WP:IUPC. ----- Second Skin (talk) 08:39, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Iwabo debut EP 2007.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Iwabo debut EP 2007.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:30, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Iwabo debut EP 2007.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Iwabo debut EP 2007.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 00:13, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PoV on Nokturnal mortum

Hello. Please stop making biased and PoV edits on the Nokturnal Mortum article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uzrname (talkcontribs) 00:12, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing "POV" or whatever you mean by that in any of the content you keep edit warring over. Also your only other argument is "facts", despite you cite no sources for any of the content you keep persistently fighting with; that's uhh not how the site works, dude. Second Skin (talk) 08:26, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected copyright problems

Hey, I just wanted to make sure that you saw this comment before you reverted for a third time at that article. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:58, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mayhem - The Dawn of the Black Hearts -original press-.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mayhem - The Dawn of the Black Hearts -original press-.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Mayhem - The Dawn of the Black Hearts -original press-.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:30, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Años en infierno moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Años en infierno, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:51, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

LOOKING FOR SUPPORT FOR THE NEXT ARTICLE

User:Second Skin Please check my colleague's article "Grind History" and you will see that his work is not valued as it should be: [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Grindcore&oldid=1022727510]]

Greetings to you, I am seeking support for the general definition of Grindcore based on the increase in information on "precursors" [[1]] made by the user "Grind History" on the "Grindcore" page.

I know "Grind History" we both attend the same university, we have a group of "Grindcore. He told me the unfair treatment he received from Issan Sumisu for not valuing his work, now I am looking for support for this definition made by Likewise as Issan Sumisu seeks support from administrators. I try to help him by looking for people to support the "Grind History" article and see the research that he did citing 3 books, interviews. I wanted to mention that Grind History created the page " Atavistic "which was closed by an administrator saying that it" never existed "however this is written on the page of" Napalm Death "

Some time ago, about 1 year ago I wanted to edit the Grindcore page but without any bibliographic citation to support me. Now for that reason they think they have "suspicions" that I am a "sockpuppetry" from "Grind History", however I passed THE CHEKUSER TEST therefore I am not a puppet of Grind History. Unfortunately my friend made "sockppupet" with different accounts. However, his work does not have any errors.: [[2]]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dirge (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crust.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Años en infierno

Information icon Hello, Second Skin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Años en infierno, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Años en infierno

Hello, Second Skin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Años en infierno".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Don't edit the same articles with your IP address Special:Contributions/23.162.0.90 and your registered username. Binksternet (talk) 06:04, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Binksternet: that isnt me.
Nonsense. You and the IP have edited the same articles in the same fashion, and you have the same communication style. You are both removing sourced genres you don't like, taking the articles away from being a summary of published sources, and skewing them in the direction of your personal preference. Binksternet (talk) 14:06, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I Checked that IP address, theres many articles that werent even edited by me and the ones that I did edit in the past made changes that weren't made by me either. Like I'd seriously log out of this account just to do some entirely different edit to a different article and then (in this case) make the same one on some obscure album months later. Really weird logic but ok..... And even if I did, I dont even use this site that often or have that much time to do such a thing like that nor "remove sourced genres that" I supposedly "don't like" or something. With that I said i find it really peculiar for someone who really cares about sourced genres all of a sudden that you even edit warred to keep unsourced genres on a page I just reverted you twice on Second Skin (talk) 15:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Buddy

Why are you goaltending Devourment's Wikipedia page? Are you a fan? 2603:8081:200A:F2FB:7994:333C:A226:501 (talk) 05:32, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Underoath

I read your edit summary and want to clarify something. Just because a band doesn't play a genre anymore does not mean it is not fit for the infobox. An infobox's purpose is not to cover only the most recent work a band or musician does, but to overview all of it. Putting Christian metal there chronicles an important part of their history according to reliable sources. Regarding this: "that could just mean anything, not even really a genre more than it is a broad terminology", while I agree that it doesn't describe sound and understand that it refers to the content in the music, that analysis is not our job as Wikipedians. I thought this better than potentially edit warring. dannymusiceditor oops 01:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vomir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montreuil.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you please show me in MOS:TRADE where it says that the "tha" in "Pheel tha Phonk" should not be capitalised? Nehme1499 06:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's stated everywhere that the word "the" in titles is lowercased Second Skin (talk) 08:28, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Paid tha Cost to Be da Boss / Trae tha Truth / Disturbing tha Peace just for a few examples... kind of a strange thing to be so concerned over (and i personally thought it would just come off as common sense when I made the edit to begin with) Second Skin (talk) 08:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

cradle of filth

i'm trying to start a talk page discussion about CoF finally having a genre, given that peolpe agreed to it for evanescence. you can join the talk page if you want to. Statik N (talk) 18:52, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seth Putnam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Misfits.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See my edits about the contents of the suicide note. "Blod eld död" is the autoritative source for this, since the authors actually spoke to Dead's brother and were allowed to examine the actual suicide noet and reprint it in its entirety in the book. Equilibrial (talk) 16:43, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the explanatory note (which you clearly didn't read):

"PLEASE READ BEFORE EDITING: The suicide note is reprinted in its entirety in "Blod eld död: En svensk metalhistoria" [Blood Fire Death: A Swedish Metal Story], Johannesson & Jefferson Klingberg, 2012, Alfabeta Bokförlag [Alfabeta Publishing House], ISBN 9789150114904, page 75. The book is the authoritative source for the contents of the note since the authors spoke to Dead's brother and were allowed to examine the actual suicide note and reprint it in the book. The note, which was written in Swedish, began with the phrase "Den kända repliken ursäkta blodet" which translates verbatim to "Excuse the blood". The note did not begin with simply the phrase "Excuse the blood". Unless you can provide an authoritative source contradicting the full reprint of the suicide note in "Blod eld död", do not change the quotation."

Unless you can provide such a source (which you won't be able to), stop reverting my sourced edits. Equilibrial (talk) 02:43, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just realized that you also changed the explanatory note! Unbelievable. Why are you actively engaging in source distortion? I will report you unless you stop this nonsense. Equilibrial (talk) 02:48, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]