Jump to content

Talk:John Vanbrugh: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m →‎top: fix name of archiving bot, replaced: |bot=MiszaBot I → |bot=Lowercase sigmabot III
→‎Kudos: new section
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 231: Line 231:


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 09:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 09:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

== Kudos ==

I use your service all the time.
I applaud greatly appreciate the depth and breadth of topics and research.
I have and will continue to support financially.
I am rushing out to take advantage of a sale on raw oysters, but will sign in and contribute on my return.
Som [[Special:Contributions/96.230.41.215|96.230.41.215]] ([[User talk:96.230.41.215|talk]]) 18:23, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:23, 20 October 2022

Former featured articleJohn Vanbrugh is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 25, 2005.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 8, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
July 5, 2010Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article

Is it just me or does the gallery need a trim? We can't post photos of all Vanbrugh's works - it'd take up too much room. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 18:44, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Enough is enough! I have moved the list and gallery [1] to a page of their own, List of works by John Vanbrugh. When writing this page a great deal of care, time and concern was dedicated to getting the balance of the page to be measured - how much or little to write on each of his works to explain his architectural concepts without detracting and becoming repetitious of the individual pages already dedicated to many of his works (eg: Blenheim Palace). These great long list and galleries distort from the integrity the page and serve no purpose and I note they now seem to be appearing on other architectural pages too. We have links and categories to assist the more interested readers - huge galleries and lists are not necessary - lists have traditionally always had pages of their own.  Giacomo  11:05, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good to me. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 19:26, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline Template is Inaccessible as Graphical Info

The "Timeline" portion of the article is a graphic, which makes it impossible for those who cannot process graphics -- in particular, the blind and partially sighted, for text-in-graphics tends to become less clear the larger the graphic is displayed -- to obtain the information contained in the Timeline.

use of this template should be discontinued and replaced by actual text contained in a timeline whose layout is controlled by CSS oedipus (talk) 22:46, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A challenge! Did you mean something like this, using Template:Graphical timeline rather than Wikipedia:EasyTimeline:
Old timeline New timeline
I can see that having this as text (rather than as a graphic) is an improvement, but it is a bit bigger and doesn't seem to want to start with the lower years (1664) at the top. No doubt this can be improved to use sidebars to show at a glance when he was in India or France, or working on various projects. There are some other examples, such as Template:Joan of Arc graphical timeline. -- Ferma (talk) 19:23, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Vanbrugh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:41, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on John Vanbrugh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos

I use your service all the time. I applaud greatly appreciate the depth and breadth of topics and research. I have and will continue to support financially. I am rushing out to take advantage of a sale on raw oysters, but will sign in and contribute on my return. Som 96.230.41.215 (talk) 18:23, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]