User talk:SikiWtideI: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:52, 18 January 2023

Welcome!

Hi SikiWtideI! I noticed your contributions to User:EWikist/Templates/PunGenerator and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Sahaib (talk) 19:12, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! This is really helpful. SikiWtideI (talk) 19:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Hall (doctor) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Robert Hall (doctor), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 02:12, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Hall (doctor) (October 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This page has been moved back from article space to draft space. Please read the comments by the draftifying reviewer and address them. Do not resubmit this draft without addressing the comments of the previous reviewer. If you do not understand why this article was sent back to draft space, please ask the reviewer rather than simply resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement, it will probably be rejected.

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the biographical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:GNG for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Hall (doctor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:03, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SikiWtideI! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:03, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Johnson Motors

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Johnson Motors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 22:30, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Robert Hall (physician) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Robert Hall (physician). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:11, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi SikiWtideI! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 03:19, Friday, November 4, 2022 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi SikiWtideI! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 03:20, Friday, November 4, 2022 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Women in Red

Hi there, SikiWtideI, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you are gaining experience with the Wikipedia Adventure. When you feel ready to create a woman's biography, you should find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules- Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 19:57, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I don’t feel ready just yet to create a biography, so I’ll expand the stubs for a while before moving on to create articles for Women In Red. SikiWtideI (Speak to the backwards police) 20:29, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. Just let me know when you feel ready to create a draft and I'll try to help you along. It's easier to write biographies of people who are no longer living as there are special requirements for living people and reviewers look at them more carefully.--Ipigott (talk) 09:31, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ann Eliza Clark Gulick moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Ann Eliza Clark Gulick. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:30, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in December 2022

Women in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250

Online events:

New: Alphabet run K & L | Geofocus Southeast Asia | Women who died in 2022
Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman

See also:

Women in Climate Change collaboration runs 1 December 2022 - 31 January 2023

Tip of the month:

Remember to search slight spelling variations of your subject's name,
like Katherine/Katharine or Elizabeth/Elisabeth, especially for historical subjects.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events.
Follow us on social media:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Nomination of Lucy Easthope for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucy Easthope is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy Easthope until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 14:46, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2023

Happy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254

Online events:

New: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run M & N | Geofocus East Asia
Continuing: #1day1woman | Women who died in 2022

See also:

Editing For Effie collaboration with the Smithsonian, January 8 & 9 (global event)

Tip of the month:

De-orphan and incorporate an article into Wikipedia using the Find Link tool

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events.
Follow us on social media:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Maria Oliverio moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Maria Oliverio, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:56, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

... is too small, as seen at Special:Diff/1133265535. Please change the format or size of your signature. – robertsky (talk) 03:55, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I think I changed it now, sorry about that.

SikiWtideI's user page

^{Talk_{to the backwards police}}

04:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

It still breaks the signature policy. Please change. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it now, is this ok? SikiWtideI (Talk to me) 21:52, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 11:53, 18 January 2023 edit AirshipJungleman29 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 37,077 edits →‎Your signature: sig ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:52, 18 January 2023 edit undo SikiWtideI (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 576 edits No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Next edit →
Line 182:		Line 182:

	It still breaks the [[WP:SIGAPP\|signature policy]]. Please change. [[User:AirshipJungleman29\|~~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29\|talk]]) 11:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)		It still breaks the [[WP:SIGAPP\|signature policy]]. Please change. [[User:AirshipJungleman29\|~~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29\|talk]]) 11:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

			I fixed it now, is this ok? [[User:SikiWtideI\|SikiWtideI]] ([[User talk:SikiWtideI\|Talk to me]]) 21:52, 18 January 2023 (UTC)