Jump to content

Talk:MeToo movement: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Disability: new section
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 66: Line 66:
::That is a false statement and is directly contradicted by the my statement above (06:55, 17 January 2023). This proposes to merge content and create a new section and you would have read that above (assuming you read it before making a comment). [[User:Jtbobwaysf|Jtbobwaysf]] ([[User talk:Jtbobwaysf|talk]]) 22:40, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
::That is a false statement and is directly contradicted by the my statement above (06:55, 17 January 2023). This proposes to merge content and create a new section and you would have read that above (assuming you read it before making a comment). [[User:Jtbobwaysf|Jtbobwaysf]] ([[User talk:Jtbobwaysf|talk]]) 22:40, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
*'''Oppose'''. Proposer says we don't have length problems, but this article's prose size (text only) is at 75 kB, per [[WP:SIZERULE]] we are quite close to having to split content out from this page. I don't think adding content that can stand on its own is a good idea, and [[Believe women]] is clearly notable enough to pass GNG and probably needs to be expanded upon itself. ––[[User:FormalDude|{{color|#004ac0|Formal}}{{color|black|Dude}}]] [[User talk:FormalDude|<span style="color:#004ac0;font-size:90%;">(talk)</span>]] 02:38, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
*'''Oppose'''. Proposer says we don't have length problems, but this article's prose size (text only) is at 75 kB, per [[WP:SIZERULE]] we are quite close to having to split content out from this page. I don't think adding content that can stand on its own is a good idea, and [[Believe women]] is clearly notable enough to pass GNG and probably needs to be expanded upon itself. ––[[User:FormalDude|{{color|#004ac0|Formal}}{{color|black|Dude}}]] [[User talk:FormalDude|<span style="color:#004ac0;font-size:90%;">(talk)</span>]] 02:38, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

== Disability ==

Metoo is supposedly a hashtag for anyone who verbally harrass disabled people around the internet not about sexual in cyberspace.[[Special:Contributions/2404:8000:1027:85F6:C98F:B3CE:753D:CFCA|2404:8000:1027:85F6:C98F:B3CE:753D:CFCA]] ([[User talk:2404:8000:1027:85F6:C98F:B3CE:753D:CFCA|talk]]) 22:30, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:30, 13 February 2023

Template:Vital article

Splitting proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to split. No people opposing after a couple weeks. Wgullyn // talk // contribs 02:58, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that MeToo_movement#International_response be split into a separate page called International response to the MeToo movement. The content of the current page is too specific for a general overview and these sections are large enough to make their own page. I would suggest leaving the first general paragraph in the section (and perhaps globalising it a bit) and adding a link to the new article. Pabsoluterince (talk) 04:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that section makes up a large chunk of the content and should be its own article. Wgullyn (talk) 22:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support: This would be a great way to fix the page size issue. ~BappleBusiness[talk] 00:48, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-01

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yare.26 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Gracemuranaka.

— Assignment last updated by WGST320 (talk) 01:36, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-02

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sunflowers09 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Antregono.

— Assignment last updated by ACHorwitz (talk) 18:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Communication and Social Change

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2022 and 12 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bb0208 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Jjohnson220 (talk) 23:21, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Merged content from Believe women to here. Believe woman article seems to be a sub-slogan of the MeeToo movement, and has much less coverage. Might as well merge here and create a section with the content, we do not appear to have length problems. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 07:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jtbobwaysf: where would it go/what would we say about it? It's at least not obvious to me where it would make sense to fit the content in that article in. Endwise (talk) 11:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Endwise: At Believe women I read that "Believe women" is an American political slogan arising out of the #MeToo movement". Thus I would add it somewhere as a section or sub-section. For example I did this diff (and later reverted) as an example. Note my edit is still quite crudely implemented, but I think it can show at least the idea. I have no position if it be added as a main section, or as a sub-section with the #HimToo, I just saw the easiest fit there when I did it today. My merger proposal is not based on any particular merge location in the article, that I am somewhat indifferent to. I just dont see a stand-alone notability of the Believe Woman article. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 06:55, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Jtbobwaysf: That looks good to me. You have my blessing! Endwise (talk) 02:20, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose merge. The notability of the phrase is demonstrated in the article, and there is no need to merge. This proposal seems predicated on the deletion of a lot of sourced material. StAnselm (talk) 04:00, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That is a false statement and is directly contradicted by the my statement above (06:55, 17 January 2023). This proposes to merge content and create a new section and you would have read that above (assuming you read it before making a comment). Jtbobwaysf (talk) 22:40, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disability

Metoo is supposedly a hashtag for anyone who verbally harrass disabled people around the internet not about sexual in cyberspace.2404:8000:1027:85F6:C98F:B3CE:753D:CFCA (talk) 22:30, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]