Jump to content

Talk:Notre-Dame fire: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
Adding/updating {{OnThisDay}} for 2023-04-15. Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OnThisDayTagger
Line 49: Line 49:


The fire has also been the subject of a film on Netflix and a documentary on Disney+. Also, shortly after the fire, Ubisoft made its video game Assassin’s Creed: Unity (which had been released before the fire) available for free to all for a limited time, as the game contains a complete interactive model of the cathedral. Perhaps someone could add these to the article? [[User:Jhurley85|Jhurley85]] ([[User talk:Jhurley85|talk]]) 00:38, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
The fire has also been the subject of a film on Netflix and a documentary on Disney+. Also, shortly after the fire, Ubisoft made its video game Assassin’s Creed: Unity (which had been released before the fire) available for free to all for a limited time, as the game contains a complete interactive model of the cathedral. Perhaps someone could add these to the article? [[User:Jhurley85|Jhurley85]] ([[User talk:Jhurley85|talk]]) 00:38, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

== Notability of claim of 'accident' predating the fire brigade even arriving? ==

Is it notable that this is the first disaster in history where the media, church, and government were declaring it was an 'accidental fire' before the fire brigade had even arrived on the scene and many days before a fire investigator had even gotten a look at the place? Before police, fire, or anyone had arrived - straight as it was a breaking story, there was a unanimous statement from all three. "Accident." Given that no one had been INTO the church since the fire had started, this was clearly a lie to placate the public and their jumping the gun was what made it evident. I'm in no way suggesting it's NOT an accident, but three institutes of power being caught in a lie is a notable and interesting historical event in my books. I don't think I've seen that done before, not so blatantly and in a way that a simple bit of reasoning can prove that they are lying to the public to placate them. [[Special:Contributions/2001:8003:37B8:D900:50FD:2CD8:8930:2A5B|2001:8003:37B8:D900:50FD:2CD8:8930:2A5B]] ([[User talk:2001:8003:37B8:D900:50FD:2CD8:8930:2A5B|talk]]) 11:39, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:39, 14 May 2023


Hello! This is to let editors know that File:Flèche en feu - Spire on Fire.jpeg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for June 12, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-06-12. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 21:06, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notre-Dame fire

The Notre-Dame fire broke out in the cathedral of Notre-Dame de Paris on 15 April 2019, causing severe damage to the building's spire, roof, and upper walls. The fire resulted in the contamination of the site and nearby areas of the city with toxic dust and lead. Investigators believed that the fire was caused by a cigarette or an electrical short circuit; the prosecutor of Paris found no evidence showing the fire was started deliberately. The cathedral's wooden spire, or flèche, was built by Eugène Viollet-le-Duc in the Gothic Revival style and installed in 1859, weighing around 250 tons. This photograph, taken during the 2019 fire, depicts the spire of Notre-Dame aflame; it collapsed shortly afterwards.

Photograph credit: Guillaume Levrier

Service at the time of the fire?

According to KTOTV there was the usual service of vespers on Monday 15 April. Given that vespers starts at 5:45pm and lasted 27 minutes, this video ends just minutes before the fire was discovered. https://www.ktotv.com/video/00267638/vepres-du-15-avril-2019 Can anyone confirm? Point of Presencetalk 11:01, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Media Culture -BN

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2022 and 13 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sloanerooney (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Sloanerooney (talk) 20:03, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Other media references

The fire has also been the subject of a film on Netflix and a documentary on Disney+. Also, shortly after the fire, Ubisoft made its video game Assassin’s Creed: Unity (which had been released before the fire) available for free to all for a limited time, as the game contains a complete interactive model of the cathedral. Perhaps someone could add these to the article? Jhurley85 (talk) 00:38, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of claim of 'accident' predating the fire brigade even arriving?

Is it notable that this is the first disaster in history where the media, church, and government were declaring it was an 'accidental fire' before the fire brigade had even arrived on the scene and many days before a fire investigator had even gotten a look at the place? Before police, fire, or anyone had arrived - straight as it was a breaking story, there was a unanimous statement from all three. "Accident." Given that no one had been INTO the church since the fire had started, this was clearly a lie to placate the public and their jumping the gun was what made it evident. I'm in no way suggesting it's NOT an accident, but three institutes of power being caught in a lie is a notable and interesting historical event in my books. I don't think I've seen that done before, not so blatantly and in a way that a simple bit of reasoning can prove that they are lying to the public to placate them. 2001:8003:37B8:D900:50FD:2CD8:8930:2A5B (talk) 11:39, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]