User talk:RZuo

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:13, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Abortion in Hong Kong

Hello RZuo,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Abortion in Hong Kong for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 09:27, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anita Lee

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anita Lee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ─ The Aafī ^(talk) 15:15, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of CRUSE

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CRUSE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 21:23, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Page move result

RZuo, you reverted edits that were follow-ups to a page move and unsynchronized the person's name to the page title. Since you did not explain it in your edit summary, why did you do that? Those should be reverted back to synchronize with the article title, so please do so. P.I. Ellsworth  ed. ^put'r there 17:32, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

1. those two edits contradict the references.
2. those edits contradict the person's true name.
3. no wikipedia rule mandates changing the formal and correct name of a person to match the title of the page (and the title is wrong). try "synchronising" Bill Clinton.--RZuo (talk) 18:24, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hardlock Industry

Hello, RZuo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hardlock Industry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Tuya Inc. moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tuya Inc., is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:59, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Tuya Inc. moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tuya Inc., is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – robertsky (talk) 07:48, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Goldberg drum moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Goldberg drum, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:56, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, RZuo

Thank you for creating Magnolia (Fraser and Neave brand).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:43, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marina Diamandis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Patterson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Roast goose

Your recent editing history at Roast goose shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GiantSnowman 18:28, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Epidemiology of gonorrhoea. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:54, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Incidents/affairs

I wanted to invite you to a discussion about whether incidents and affairs should be capitalized as a rule over at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters § International incidents and affairs Remsense聊 16:52, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Duplicate of same photo at D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson‎

Hi RZuo, thanks for your work to improve Wikipedia.

However, the photo that you have inserted at the top of the D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson‎ article is already in the article, a bit further down, so we cannot have it in the article twice. I therefore reverted to the previous image.

Further, the previous image shows Thompson‎ as a professor (aged around 60), visibly at work and holding a skeleton relating to his work, whereas the one you've put at the top shows him as a very young man, perhaps a student. It seems to me that it makes good sense to have both images in the article - starting out, and having reached the top of his profession; and the second of these seems to make good sense at the head of the article, but we can rearrange things if you have convincing reasons to the contrary. I think we should put it back at the top, really. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

it doesnt meet Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Meeting_the_no_free_equivalent_criterion. RZuo (talk) 18:32, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

IMHO that's a non-neutral RfC question

The question should not argue for or against a specific outcome, or provide your arguments to do as you propose.

So I'd encourage you to rephrase the question so that it doesn't show your position as OP.

An example could be:

This RfC proposes a change to Module:Find sources/templates/Find general sources and {{Find sources}}. AP has been added as a result of #RfC_on_Module:Find_sources_-_replace_New_York_Times_with_Associated_Press, but there was no consensus to remove the New York Times.

Should we add news outlets listed below to the Find sources template? Or should we introduce the rule that individual news outlets are not to be listed in this template? Should any changes to other links be made? Szmenderowiecki (talk) 23:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

RZuo, I am really concerned about your behavior in discussions. It really isn't productive or helpful to call other editors "condescending jokers". It's a personal attack, it is namecalling, and it's very much uncivil behavior, and honestly given that you've also made a habit of assuming bad faith (such as, in a single discussion, here, here, here, here and here), after repeated warnings that you were assuming bad faith, your edit-warring and accusations of vandalism at Roast goose (after an earlier warning about edit-warring at Lord of the Rings), and the fact you have already been blocked for uncivil behavior on zh.wiki, I'm giving you one final very clear warning: Do not assume bad faith, make personal attacks, or call names again. I'd like a response to this, please, before you edit again. Valereee (talk) 17:32, 26 November 2023 (UTC)