Talk:Stormy Daniels: Difference between revisions
→She is trash: new section |
Troutfarm27 (talk | contribs) m Reverted edit by 47.214.155.219 (talk) to last version by Bubblegum elf |
||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/donald-trump-verdict-hush-money-trial-rcna152492 |
Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/donald-trump-verdict-hush-money-trial-rcna152492 |
||
[[User:Bubblegum elf|Bubblegum elf]] ([[User talk:Bubblegum elf|talk]]) 21:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC) |
[[User:Bubblegum elf|Bubblegum elf]] ([[User talk:Bubblegum elf|talk]]) 21:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
== She is trash == |
|||
Trash [[Special:Contributions/47.214.155.219|47.214.155.219]] ([[User talk:47.214.155.219|talk]]) 03:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:12, 31 May 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stormy Daniels article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days ![]() |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Stormy Daniels. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Stormy Daniels at the Reference desk. |
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Stormy Daniels was copied or moved into Stormy Daniels–Donald Trump scandal with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Template:WikiProject Donald Trump
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on March 17, 2020. |
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
"not to be confused with Storm Daniel"
Why do some editors find it necessary to create a spurious confusion between the article titles "Stormy Daniels" and "Storm Daniel" where none exists? Such hatnotes "should only be used when the ambiguity exists for a significant portion of the readership." And neither misspelling seems very likely. Drdpw (talk) 03:28, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- WP:HATCONFUSE is meant to remedy confusion between similar terms. We already recognize such potential for misspellings with Storm Daniels, which was created two days ago to redirect to this page. While I didn't create the the redirect at "Storm Daniels", I created the redirect at Stormy Daniel for the same reason. Edge3 (talk) 16:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- I second that. BananaBaron (talk) 16:53, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- Disagree - confusion between a porn actress and a weather phenomenon is somewhat unlikely. Despite the similarity of the name, there is no likelihood of mistaking the two.
- Additionally, as the first instance was added here on 11th September, we're discussing the addition of the hat, not the removal - and as such the status quo is to discuss without the presence of the hat until an agreement is made. Chaheel Riens (talk) 18:00, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think a status quo argument carries much weight in this discussion, as Storm Daniel occurred earlier this month. We could not possibly have included a relevant hatnote before last week. Edge3 (talk) 15:08, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter whether the subject of the hatnote happened a week ago, a month ago, or 2000 years ago, the fact that the hat itself only appeared a few days ago is the topic under debate, and as such (and at risk of repeating myself,) you need to justify the inclusion.
- To use your own argument - Storm Daniel was categorised on 4th September, but it took a week before the hat was added, and a day after the hat the storm had dissipated. Is it really that notable? Chaheel Riens (talk) 19:33, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- The Storm Daniel article wasn't posted on the Main Page until September 11, so the article would not have been highly-trafficked until then. Edge3 (talk) 03:12, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think a status quo argument carries much weight in this discussion, as Storm Daniel occurred earlier this month. We could not possibly have included a relevant hatnote before last week. Edge3 (talk) 15:08, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- A hatnote is only appropriate when the ambiguity is significant, common enough that a significant percentage of readers might be confused. The likelihood of confusion—Stormy Daniels for Storm Daniel or Storm Daniel for Stormy Daniels—though the double misspelling Edge3 hypothesizes are slim to minuscule, making a hatnote out of place. Drdpw (talk) 19:13, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- I second that. BananaBaron (talk) 16:53, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Support the addition But there should be a small explanation as well. I believe there is a separate template on wikipedia to do that. It'd look like something to the effect of "Not to be confused with Storm Daniels that killed X people in Libya in 2023", emphasis mine on the difference--Daikido (talk) 14:32, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- I think {{about}} is what you're looking for, but all of the hatnote templates are listed at Wikipedia:Hatnote#Hatnote templates for your reference. Edge3 (talk) 03:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
"Stormy Daniel" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Stormy Daniel has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 14 § Stormy Daniel until a consensus is reached. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:38, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Official site
Official site link is incorrect. Currently leads to spam site.
should be https://stormydaniels.com/ 68.9.117.241 (talk) 20:21, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Stormy Daniels is taking the stand at Trump's New York trial today
Should this news be added to the page?[1]174.130.222.28 (talk) 13:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- We don't do the future. Frankly, I wouldn't do it until the trial is over. But, I'd lose that argument if I bothered to make it. O3000, Ret. (talk) 13:52, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Stormy Daniels is on the stand now.[2] (talk) 14:32, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Another Wikipedia page has already recorded most of the details about her testimony at Trump's trial today. 174.130.222.28 (talk) 20:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- That's where those details should go. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Update intro to state that Trump has been convicted
The end of the introduction section of this article should be updated since Trump has now been convicted of his charges relating to Stormy Daniels.
The portion that currently states: "Trump faces 34 State of New York felony charges of falsifying business records with the intent to commit or conceal other crimes relating to these payments. His trial on these charges began on April 15, 2024." should be updated to state how Trump was found guilty of all 34 charges as of May 30, 2024.
Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/donald-trump-verdict-hush-money-trial-rcna152492 Bubblegum elf (talk) 21:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Biography articles of living people
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Low-importance biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Actors and filmmakers work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class LGBT articles
- B-Class WikiProject LGBT studies - person articles
- WikiProject LGBT studies - person articles
- WikiProject LGBT studies articles
- B-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- B-Class American politics articles
- Low-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- B-Class Pornography articles
- Low-importance Pornography articles
- B-Class Low-importance Pornography articles
- WikiProject Pornography articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- B-Class Louisiana articles
- Low-importance Louisiana articles
- WikiProject Louisiana articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class WikiProject Women articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report
- Selected anniversaries (March 2020)