User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 25

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

Speedy Deletion of Dj Nebula page

Why did you delete my page I started to create? I have been a fixture of dance music here in the US for well over 15 years. You can check my artist profile here:

http://www.myspace.com/djnebula

I do not understand why this qualifies for speedy deletion. I am the guy who brought House Music to Salt Lake City. Please get back to me on why you have done this. Or who I need to speak to get my page activated so I can upload pics, flyers and reviews of my music.

Dj Nebula djnebula@gmail.com

_________

Accountcreator

hello, NawlinWiki. RyanLupin just approved me on the WP:ACC tool, but I need an admin to give me the flag. Would you like to do the honors? Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 23:43, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Okay. If you're still following, first you need to be approved by another Account creator (I already was). Then, if the person who approved you isn't a sysop, you need to ask an en.wiki sysop to go into Special:userrights and check off the Accountcreator flag. Sorry if I'm bothering you. Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 12:19, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

• Nawlin it's the same as granting rollback, but (as far as I know), we're supposed to grant it based on need; i.e., the user has shown that he 1) knows how to create accounts appropriately within policy and 2) is hitting the account creation throttle on a regular basis. But, as with rollback, it's up to an admins individual discretion most of the time. In a nutshell: you only need the acc flag if you are regularly creating more than 6 accounts a day. See also Granting and revoking accountcreator. –xenocidic (talk) 14:10, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Unanswered post copied back from the archive

California

On July 11 you changed the protection status of California but failed to update the image lock. Your edit summary reads: (Changed protection level for "California": allowing editing, moveprotection [move=sysop])

I changed {{pp-semi-vandalism|expiry=July 27, 2008|small=yes}} to {{pp-move|small=yes}} to reflect the change you made. Please take some time to review your other edits and correct any similar mistakes. Thank you. Dbiel ^(Talk) 21:25, 13 July 2008 (UTC)reposted Dbiel ^(Talk) 01:56, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Got it, thanks. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:25, 13 July 2008 (UTC) reposted from my talk page Dbiel ^(Talk) 02:36, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

If you got it, why are you still move protecting pages without adding {{pp-move|small=yes}} see Oil or not fixing your previous edits?

• Seaweed - I fixed this one
• Apollo 11 - I fixed this one
• Ewok
• Infrared
• Ultraviolet

just a few of your most recent move locks posted by you Dbiel ^(Talk) 02:36, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, thought you were complaining about incorrect icon, not lack of same. I'll put them on (it'll take a while, be patient). NawlinWiki (talk) 02:39, 14 July 2008 (UTC) reposted from my talk page Dbiel ^(Talk) 02:45, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

No problem, I fully understand that it can take some time. Dbiel ^(Talk) 02:45, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

It appears that I am using the wrong template. {{pp-move|small=yes}} is for article disputes; {{pp-move-vandalism|small=yes}} is for vandalism protection. Dbiel ^(Talk) 03:12, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

• Sorry I miss lead you. I will correct the edits where you added the wrong template base on bad information I posted here. Dbiel ^(Talk) 03:49, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...

For this; I was working on it and I'm a little slow still (haven't closed a lot yet). Cheers!  Frank  |  talk  11:11, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Risk

I dont take risk of getting blocked by csd.I am newcommer.--
[+]►▌●√Ω ЯЯΛUNΛΣ● ▌ 11:17, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

1. when i press csd a box comes (ajax) but how to submit the query there is no button.

Speedy deletion of Dildo Museum pr. G3.

Did you check the article history? I'd think the original redirect to Dildo, Newfoundland and Labrador should warrant discussion rather than speedy. Taemyr (talk) 12:36, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Slug

Hi NawlinWiki, I see you have a temporary delete on the Slug article. I know it does attract vandalism, but recently it had been fairly OK, and when vandal additions appeared, they were cleaned up pretty fast. Will it be gone for a few days? Thanks. Invertzoo (talk) 13:38, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh yes I see! It was back as soon as I finished my note to you! Thanks! Invertzoo (talk) 13:39, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Mr. freeze.

Why did you delete and then restore Mr. Freeze? I couldn't find any reasons in the logs or edit history. ThuranX (talk) 13:41, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to hijack this thread but I have the same question regarding the deletion, restoration and protection of Domestic violence?--Cailil ^talk 23:34, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Black Keyz Music

Black Keyz Music page has continually been deleted for reasons that are not valid. Black Keyz has just recently produced Musiq Soulchild's new single Radio and are in no way using Wikipedia as advertisement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.224.97.45 (talk) 16:53, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Semiprotecting Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart

Dear NawlinWiki:

I'm writing to ask you to restore semiprotection to the Mozart article. Just as things were before the semiprotection was imposed 10 months ago, the anons are now contributing a heavy flow of vandalism and ill-informed edits, which is a considerable burden to monitor and trim back. If you restore semiprotection, then the knowledgeable editors could spend their Wiki-time on constructive improvements instead.

Sincerely, Opus33 (talk) 18:06, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks very much. Opus33 (talk) 23:41, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Deleting Bob Maumill

I admit I'm new to Wikipedia - but why would you delete an article while I'm still writing it? I haven't finished adding in all my references and links yet! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasonjordan (talk • contribs) 11:27, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Software

Hello NawlinWiki. You have been invited to join WikiProject Software, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the Software-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits relating to or within the scope of the project. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of project members. You may also wish to add {{User WikiProject Software}} to your userpage and == WikiProject Software Centralized Announcement System == {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Software/Announcement-u}} to the top of your talk page. If you know someone who might be interested, please pass this message onto others by pasting this code into their talk page: == [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Software|WikiProject Software]] Invite == {{subst:Software invite|~~~~}} Thanks, Tyw7, formerly Troop350 (Talk ● Contributions) 09:20, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi NawlinWiki

Sorry for the delay in my work (I was on Vacation), Can you take a look at my user page D453g/Tri North Lighting, Inc. for me? I have started working on the refrences and I want to make sure that I am doing them right. It was a little confusing reading through everything last night about the refrences and I wanted to see what you think. By the way, I did move it from my user space since the page meets the requirements as far as I can tell. If you need more please let me know. I will still be adding more information on this company, then I would like to start writing about Nexxus Lighting which is a larger public company as well. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by D453g (talk • contribs) 12:59, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Travel All Russia

Hi NawlinWiki, I was wondering what is the reason why the page that i created has been deleted. You mentioned that the problem had something to do with "redirect," can you please give me a bit more detail. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sshirokov (talk • contribs) 15:20, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Re:KamikazeBot

Hi, I founded a universal account and I go to the main page in the enWiki with a Kamikazebot, but I will not ever edited from this account, because the low-English-speaking, and I know that it will be dangerous experiment:-) Karol007 (talk) 09:02, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Lal Senaratne

Hi, as much as you might think Lal Senaratne is fictional, he happens to be a real person. I don't know if it's because you only care about what happens in your country, and what you have heard of, or if its that you think he is a 'friend' of mine, but he isn't. And he deserves a page. I don't understand why you would delete the page without consideration that there is a great man living in New Zealand (that's right, there are stars out of america) that should be known more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JORCNC (talk • contribs) 13:03, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Protecting templates

Hi NawlinWiki. I noticed that you protected some templates I am watching. When you protect a template you should move (cut and paste) its documentation, categories and interwiki links to a /doc subpage so that non-admins still can update those things. You should also add the {{pp-template}} to the template. Thus, you should add something like this code to any template you protect:

<noinclude>

{{pp-template|small=yes}}
{{Documentation}}
<!-- Add categories and interwikis to the /doc subpage, not here! -->
</noinclude>

If you are not familiar with this procedure then you can take a look at what I did with {{Picture of the day}} and {{Picture of the day/doc}} and read up on template documentation at Wikipedia:Template documentation.

--David Göthberg (talk) 14:43, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Master in Healthcare Innovation

Ronda Atkinson -- I just made an entry for a graduate degree that is one of the first in the country. Master in Healthcare Innovation is an accredited program offered by Arizona State University. We are not advertising the program but want to let people know of the trend toward innovation in healthcare. How would you suggest I proceed? Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rondaatkinson (talk • contribs) 16:18, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

What about an article that was published in a journal "Clinical Nurse Specialist" by an independent source who references this program? Rondaatkinson (talk) 17:29, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Charlie the unicorn

Hello NawlinWiki. I'd like to start a Charlie The Unicorn page and noticed that you had recently deleted a stub. In recent international travels, I have been quite surprised to find many people from many different countries who instantly recognize references from Charlie the unicorn. I believe that Charlie illustrates how the Internet provides a cultural form for universally appealing art. Charlie is obviously not what one might call high-brow art, but somehow these silly little cartoons capture common feelings and experiences, ones that people from all over the world identify with. I would like to provide a common form for capturing the background, details (for example, the translation of the Z episode) and comparative analysis of the cartoons. As with popular movies and television shows, Charlie reflects who we are as a global culture and deserves a place on wikipedia. Kowboyz1003 (talk) 20:09, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Your prize!

		The Barnstar of good intentions
		For taking the effort to do something noble, and then regretting it I hereby award you the Barnstar of good intentions! Chillum 03:09, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Its the thought that counts. Synergy 06:10, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Help Please regarding speedily deleted manchester music article

Hi, just had unsigned rock band article speedily deleted. I forgot to insert the under construction headnote as the band were a popular manchester act, being played on XFM Manchester and supporting touring bands running through the region. the band also has recognition from manchester-music.co.uk and the linc magazine (local monthly student magazine). This is a significant article for muso's living in or around the manchester / wigan region of the north west of england. Any help on how it can be reposted would be greatly appreciated as no hard copy saved! thanks for your time. Johnny8dl (talk) 16:13, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Help please, speedily deleted Seven article

Hello, you deleted my account on the mod "Seven Hour War" yet again. Could you please tell me what I should do to stop you from getting rid of it, instead of just deleting what took the best of an hour? If changes need to be made, they will...please explain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SevenHourWar (talk • contribs) 16:17, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

User to be blocked

Hi NawlinWiki. Can you please indefblock this user? Obviously a spam-only account. Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 16:32, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism

Hi. A lot of accounts are being created solely to vandalize User_talk:206.53.154.135 and related pages. They are probably related. Is there anything that can be done about that? Some good admin work is being wasted in reverting their damage. --Damiens.rf 16:38, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Why did you delete my article on the Little Brown Dudes? Brohans Dude (talk) 19:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

I was not done with article yet. Let me introduce myself -- I am Andry. Brohans Dude (talk) 19:45, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Don't talk much do ya? Brohans Dude (talk) 20:36, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of 'Princeton Collins'

You say you deleted because I didn't note significance or verifiable source. I did both of those, creating links tto the exact web page where I obtained my information. Put the page back up until you get a real reason. And its crap that I have to re-create the entire page you ppl who delete crap should save it. Why should I have to do more work for your mistake? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Opcrm (talk • contribs) 01:11, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Page move vandalism of Plymouth

Hi, I don't know if you forget to do it or not, but just to let you know you didn't delete and then restore the article on Plymouth, whereas you did for its talk page. Thanks bsrboy (talk) 14:51, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry, I'm so sorry, I didn't know about this, I will read the Wiipedia links you sent me and find out how to experiment goodly on sandbox. The Bible teaches to forgive and love everyone. Speaker56 (talk) 15:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Altamont Commuter Express

why did you delete the template i was trying to create!? I even left a message on the talk page to let you know about it. It was not a redirect it was to be a new article. would you restore the content please?^MY♥_INchile 00:53, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah i feel like an ass, i figured that out right after leaving my stressed out message, sorry about that.^MY♥_INchile 00:55, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Emir34

Your welcome! The abbreviation code 'AK' belongs to Alaska but Little Rock, AK was redirecting to the Arkansas capital. So I changed it to Alaska to make it right. I would be happy to fix a mistake in Wikipedia. By the way, I founded WP:CGC and I would be happy if you joined. I am the only member of the WikiProject —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emir34 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Conceding defeat, whatever

I'll let you have your way, because I really don't care, but please don't accuse me of arbitrarily blanking the page when I gave more than reasonable notice and a reasonable explanation.

I don't care if you are an administrator or if you have a billion edits, please look at the date stamps before leaping to conclusions and respond instead of just immediately reverting when you disagree. SDY (talk) 02:04, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Threats

A few days ago you blocked this user who used racial slurs at various pages - User:Bob849032 at my suggestion. - Yesterday he changed names to User:Bob849031 and vandalized my user page here:[1], and Tyrenius blocked him..and now he's using a new name again today with new threats here: [2]

Can you protect my talk page and my user page? I'd appreciate your help...Thank you..Modernist (talk) 15:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your help yesterday. Modernist (talk) 15:57, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Erroneous article deletion

The article Disc coupling was marked as "blatant advertising" and deleted by you. This is erroneous, because the term "disc coupling" is generic non-trademarked name of a (common) mechanical part. Furthermore, nowhere in the article was any reference made to a company or their products. If the reference did so, that should be removed, not the entire article. Note that I'm not the original writer, so I have no vested interest in it. -- P199 (talk) 20:48, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

• If you repost it, I will edit to make it generic. -- P199 (talk) 20:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Note that the same applies to the article Jaw Coupling. Please restore it and I'll remove commercial references. -- P199 (talk) 16:23, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Nobility Publishing

Can you please explain why Nobility Publishing was deleted speedily. I refreshed to take references from the body of the article and add them to the end only to notice it had been deleted within 30 seconds. While we are a small press, we are a legitimate publishing company. Our article did nothing different from the articles of larger publishing houses on Wikipedia such as Harper Collins, Simon & Schuster, Aladdin Paperbacks, etc.

The only difference I see is that they have been around longer and thus have more verifiable articles already in print. That does not mean we do not have articles in the works, people are not searching for us, or we do not belong on this site and others. This article was meant to be purely informational about a small press.

Can you please explain its deltion? Is it because we put in a section for submission guidelines?

NobilityPublishing (talk) 00:15, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

According to the logs, nobility publishing was deleted under the speedy deletion criterion A7: "An article about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.". -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 07:47, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Recent temporary deletions

Recently, you speedily deleted a number of pages, providing no reason other than "temp", and then undeleted them. Although our deletion and speedy deletion policies do not technically require any explanation for deletions, an explanation would be appreciated. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 07:47, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

In response to your post on my talk page, thanks, I suspected it was vandalism-related. -- Gordon Ecker (talk) 02:12, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

User:Projmkultra

I was hoping you could take a look at User talk:Projmkultra for me. This editor is the author of Cogito animalia, and has had several issues in the past with self-promotion of the book. I {{prod}}ded it thinking that they had a chance at making something out of the article, but I'm 99% positive that this is all the editor is going to do...plus there's the issues with self-promotion. Do you think that I should take this to AfD, AIV, or speedy? Give me guidance oh wise one. --Seascic ^T/_C 13:27, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

SSBM talk page

Oh ok you mind doing it then? I think we are in dire need of an archive. 63.76.234.250 (talk) 17:57, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Ok thanks :) 63.76.234.250 (talk) 17:58, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

I have joined in the discussion at 63.76.234.250's talk page. I am mentioning it here so you don't miss my message. Chillum 18:00, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Jaw coupling

It's back, thinly disguised advert for manufacturer of said devices. – ukexpat (talk) 18:41, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

YOUR VIOLATION OF WIKIPEDIA'S RULES IN YOUR AD-HOMINUM, DRIVE-BY ATTACK ON AN ARTICLE WHOSE REFERENCES IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR YOU TO HAVE READ!!

Wikipedia Administrators Summarily Deleted My Article "Blaspheming Against The Holy Spirit" Without Warning Or Reasons And Without Having Reviewed My Sources Thusly Summarily Denying Me The Ability To Edit The Article Per Wikipedia's Own Policy

Writer's response to all who have continually summarily deleted the article blasphemy against the Holy Spirit without warning or reasons only unsupported insinuations and ad-homonym attacks. 1. C.Fred was the one that suggested that I upload the article to my user page first so you could help me edit it. That's not what you did though. You lied to me. 2. C.Fred and NawlinWiki how is it that you expect me to believe that the topic is not weighty enough for Wikipedia, and that unlike many of the imperfect, some ridiculous Wikipedia articles I've read that are horribly written, that I, unlike them have to post a perfect draft on the fist occasion. Answer this question, "Why does Wikipedia have a policy on editing? 3. How is it that you cite a lack of sources as a reason for deleting my entire article when I provided you with specific, independent, 3rd party, well credentialed sources. If you disagree I'll insist that you delete every single Wikipedia page without references that I've discovered to exist. Coincidentally, all I have to do is reference the poorly written, unreferenced Wikipedia page entitled, "Eternal Sin" to identify one of many pages on Wikipedia that have no references whatsoever. 4. By the way the conclusions of the "Eternal Sin" article are incorrect. None of the things stated as "thought to be" or "speculated to be" the unforgivable sin of blaspheming against the Holy Spirit are it. That's why this article, along with every other article on the topic that I have seen ever posted on your website has to suggest that the unforgivable sin is thought to be five different things when it's not and I can and will prove it. 5. C.Fred, you clearly didn't have enough time to read the books I cited as references overnight since you last communicated to me on my user page suggesting he help me with my article. 6. The topic of "Blasphemy Against The Holy Spirit" is a credible topic comparable to any other topic you have on this website whose explanation and consequences are material rather than that of a good bit of the content on this site. There is no way for you to dispute the legitimacy of the content on the site. Is the topic to whimsical for you? Is it you, the same administrators coincidently that choose to violate your own rules repetitively and without evidence, that you claim there is much of that........, what? You can't include it? That's odd. Why not? 7. Regarding your repetitive summary deletions of my article per Wikipedia's own policy guidelines: Wikipedia's deletion policy/Alternatives To Deletion Page 2 of 8 states that, "If the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion." "Disputes over page content are not dealt with by deleting the page." Wikipedia Deletion Policy Page 3 of 8. You, administrators violated your own rules. "My article meets none of the "Reasons For Deletion" since 8. This page was merely posted on my user page where it was to remain until edited into conformity with Wikipedia policy but Wikipedia's administrators can't follow their own rules and perform as they committed to performing and you want me to accept both of your ridiculous reasons for deletion of the article which haven't-not for the last 8 times-you have refused to respond to my requests for help editing the article which you simply responded to by deleting the article without ever contacting me. 9. Next, referencing "What Wikipedia Is Not" page 9 of 11: "Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy" which advises, "Follow the spirit, not the letter, of any rules, policies and guidelines if you feel they conflict. If the rules prevent you from improving the encyclopedia, you should ignore them". Do I need to interpret this to either or both of you? Do you not get what I said about the fact that unlike all other articles on the unforgivable sin, the unpardonable sin, the blasphemy against the holy spirit, and the eternal sin, each of which focuses of proposing what blasphemy against the holy spirit is because THEY DON'T KNOW. Do you not understand the conclusions that can be drawn by the facts of my article that can easily be separated from the 1st person interrogatory between God and I that took place that happened to appear in the article before it has been edited. What does editing mean? Do either of you know? 10. In fact it's not even the Wikipedia Rules that are holding me up it's the same handful of administrators who act with malice and bias who have yet to evidence a problem with the article that can't be fixed. The only important thing is that the explanation is solitary because it's not a theory and it is evidenced. Where is the evidence that it's not evidenced! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Llooke11 (talk • contribs) 21:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

current list of General Hospital

I was trying to add more info. on the artice and then you go and delete. I want to know why? --M42380 (talk) 22:11, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Ahmadoba

I am wodering what is going on with this poor stub article :( delete, restor, protect, unprotect... :-) Cheers, Gülməmməd ^Talk 22:27, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

What the...?

[3] You move-protected the article at 14:29, 24 July 2008, but Grawp moved it at 23:38, 24 July 2008. Perhaps I'm just missing it, but how did Grawp manage to move the page when protection was set as move=sysop? Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 00:06, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Nevermind, I see what new tricks Grawp has up his sleeve. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 00:16, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello

You've got some deleting and restoring to take care of. Its what you do best, hope your not intimidated and have given up. I know your not, go get em! Monster Under Your Bed ^(talk) 10:07, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Talk page protection

Can you please protect my user and talk pages? I am currently battling with a serial vandal/stalker (see here) and I have grown tired of reverting him. Thanks! ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 16:45, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, sir! ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 16:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Liv Tyler

Can the talk page of Liv Tyler be restored?.--SkyWalker (talk) 17:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. May i know why are the articles getting deleted and restored later?. --SkyWalker (talk) 17:33, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Edit summary vandalism

How DO you revert edit summary vandalism on moves? I recall a thread on WP:ANI a few days ago where others had tried and failed. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 17:38, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

International house of hebrew and fosh

It's back. --John Nagle (talk) 22:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, NawlinWiki. You have new messages at Jéské Couriano's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You've got mail, too

Thanks. I've written back. Daniel Case (talk) 01:37, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

So have I. Thanks. Acalamari 00:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Wow, you're on the front page of Encyclopedia Dramatica!

Congratulations! Must be nice to know you're getting under their skin so much, eh? —Wknight94 (talk) 13:37, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Archetype (band)

Hi! I was adding a new article about that band and it showed that once you've already deleted an article like that. I was just wondering why and if I could add it again. Another administrator has also done that in other occasion. Thanks, Khullah (talk) 16:07, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

List of micronations

Hi NawlinWiki. Could you please apply indefinite semi-protection for the above article? IP addresses and newly created accounts constantly use the page to advertise their micronations and this suggestion has the support of myself and another editor.

Thanks ---- Onecanadasquarebishopsgate 16:28, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Osmosis

Just stop a second please. Prodego ^talk 03:55, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Please stop what you are doing. Prodego ^talk 04:05, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Emailed. Prodego ^talk 04:14, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Osmosis

Need help? Kylu (talk) 03:55, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Protections

What's going on here? Many/most of the pages you've been semi-protecting have little or no edits by IPs, let along vandalism that warrants protection. - auburnpilot talk 04:14, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Makes sense. Looking at all the histories with popups, I didn't even notice there were deleted edits. Thanks, - auburnpilot talk 04:19, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

I don't pretend to know why you're moving [pagename] to [pagename]/d and back, but you should uncheck "Update any redirects that point to the original title" so User:Redirect fixer (actually part of the job queue) doesn't make useless edits. --NE2 05:41, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Steamboats of the Mississippi River

Hi there, I've been talking with a brand new wikipedian, User:Sfsorrow2, who has begun some very valuable steamboat related articles. You probably weren't aware that a small group of us have been working on these for some time, as an example Steamboats of the Columbia River, Steamboats of the Skeena River. Anyway, sfs began Steamboats of the Mississippi River and you redirected it to Steamboats. See my talk page here[4] Then he began Steamboats of the Mississippi, which would be better under the other title. So, if you get a chance, could you possibly fix the redirect so he can title it properly again? The article is a work in progress, of course, but will be a valuable addition. Thanks a lot.CindyBo^talk 07:21, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

User talk:BambooBanga

User is asking for a second chance, claiming prior good faith edit history and promising not to vandalize again. Thoughts? –xeno (talk) 20:03, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

I'd be open to giving them a second chance and keeping them on a tight leash. GlassCobra 20:07, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Redirects and /d

Hey there. When you recently purged the history of Beijing, you accidentally left the new "fix double redirects" checkbox checked, which caused User:Redirect fixer to "fix" all redirects that used to point to Beijing and point them to Beijing/d. Just a heads-up. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:54, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Fetterati

Hello. You deleted this article on grounds of non-notability. As far as I remember, there were two good references confirming notability. How can I recover the article, and for future reference can I do anything to clarify the notability further? Thanks.--Whipmaster (talk) 13:10, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of vandalism edits

I've just noticed that you're deleting a lot of pages (or revisions, rather) of page move and other kinds of vandalism. I'm not sure what exactly the point of that is, but (as has been pointed out above multiple times) please make sure that you don't have "Update any redirects that point to the original title" checked when you move the articles to /d. It would also be nice of you to rollback the edits the Redirect fixer has done so far as a result of those moves. Additionally, why do you semi-protect some of the articles? Jack and the Beanstalk hasn't been a big target for anon-vandalism as far as I can see, for example. --Conti|✉ 15:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Alright, that makes sense. You might want to set an expiry date for the semi-protections, tho. Heh, seems you have found a bug that needs fixing, then. Is there a bug report for that one yet? Anyhow, thanks for fixing the redirects again. :) --Conti|✉ 16:39, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Sonic: The Fated Hour

First off, that was quick!

Second, I would also like to request that the just-deleted article be salted, as this has been now the fourth time this article has been created and deleted, all by the same user. This will only be created again if not salted. Thank you. MuZemike (talk) 22:17, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

deletion of scythes of the emperor

Hi you deleted this page for a blatant infringement on copywriter, however you must not have read the comment I left on the talk page. I was the original author of the http://warhammer40k.wikia.com/wiki/Scythes_of_the_Emperor article (including all the pictures), therefore I had by default all the permission I required to post it to wikipedia. I did so because wikipedia is on of the best known and most used websites around and I felt the article would get more attention here.

Any chance you could put it back?

Theodore Kaczynski

You protected the Unabomber article because of the Kevin Clymo reference? Why would that trigger page protection? Clymo was his lawyer at the time your site reported Kaczynski's attempted suicide, there are many sites on the Web that confirm Clymo's representation. That wasn't vandalism in any sense. Was it because of the timing of Clymo's death? He also represented an investor in the ELIC bankruptcy.

An odd action, no vandalism seen except perhaps by the deletion of the Clymo reference.--76.212.145.186 (talk) 00:31, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the answer. I'm not a sockpuppet of Grawp or anything. But I think the Clymo reference is important, someone should reinsert it when the page protection expires.

I have no idea what country you're from, but the ELIC seizure caused a lot of trouble in the US. France, too, as many Altus officers were imprisoned. Rightfully or wrong, you have to track down many alleys to find out. Clymo was a peripheral, and his inclusion in this highly-publicized American criminal case is important to anyone doing any research. The editor who deleted it made a comment about its importance (or lack of) on the History page.--76.212.145.186 (talk) 01:49, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Hounarable hubert gibbs

is not a implausible typo, because its just the dude's honorific. Its probably speedable as an R1 (probably A7, as well) because the page it redirects to should be deleted as a g12. Sorry if all the letters and numbers are confusing. :-) --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello

I know your busy but Can you deal with this username for me? Could be nicer. Monster Under Your Bed ^(talk) 11:13, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Animexx

Why was the article deleted? (Don't say inmportance wasnt clear) The association have ~1300 members (biggest of this type in Germany), has a really big online-community and publishes doujinshis (well, didnt noticed that together with publisher Egmont Manga & Anime) and has an article in de:WP (with is much harder then here, according to my impression of en). If I'm not right here for complaintment, then please show me whereto I should go. Greetings --Don-kun (talk) 15:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Should we diskuss here or will you answer on my talk? Greetings --Don-kun (talk) 10:10, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Sarmad Palijo

may i please get my article back. I will be gratful ;p thanks

Speedy Deletion: The Vigilante Band

Hi. The article was submitted as general interest is high for this group. The band has 33-yrs history and is fairly well known.

You will notice another "Vigilante (band)" also, not associated, which exists in Wikipedia. Why only them? We have many inquiries of interest, and all that is found is the wrong "Vigilante (band)" who are of no greater or lesser relevance.

Your deletion was hasty and seems arbitrary. Please reconsider? Thanks.

Speedy Deletion: The Vigilante Band (2)

Thanks kindly for the reply.

There was no purposeful intention to promote/advertise. Sorry. Fact was presented in casual syntax. That can be, and should be I suppose, edited.

wrt is the band "Notable"...? The band matches that criteria as it has broadcast a number of times in the past, KUNM, Albuquerque. That will be added to the article.

Today's entry article was intended as a start to be added upon.

Speedy Deletion of Family Literacy Day

Hello I am new at this so I'll definitely read through all the criteria. In the meantime I think your feedback would probably help me understand how this should be worded.

Family Literacy Day is an annual day in Canada. It was proclaimed by our federal government by a parliamentary order and more than 50 jurisdictions have proclaimed it.

Last year more than 275,000 Canadian commemorated the day, so it is a real initiative and does a lot of good to help families that grapple with low literacy skills. In Canada approximately, 40 per cent have low levels of literacy so they cannot de-code complex sentences and ideas. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abc canada (talk • contribs) 20:06, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

City template

You recently added pp-template to the city template. Putting it outside the noinclude adds a line break that screws up formatting all over Wikipedia. On top of that, you protected the page, so I can't just fix it. It is really a good idea to protect pages that have zero history of vandalism, just because they might be vandalized someday? Foobaz·o< 20:42, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Template protections

When protecting templates, please do not forget to surround the lock icons with <noinclude> tags as you did with Template:Party shading/Independent. You've been causing formatting troubles on many pages by having them erroneously display lock icons or malformed template code. --Millbrooky (talk) 21:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

You've been had

You seem to have reverted the removal of conspicuous nonsense. See [5] and the talk page of that article. You're not the only one. Fortunately, Geni fixed it. DGG (talk) 21:28, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Sarmad Palijo

I agree with you on that note but i put some effort to write that...can you email it to me ... at youth_stv@yahoo.com I hope its not too much trouble...i guess illjust wait for him to make it to parlianment...but id like to keep what ive written...i wont repost till i find there is enough reason in the coming days..thanks again... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mai makli (talk • contribs) 22:47, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Eclipse screen saver deleted

I don't see how a simple description of this program is "Blatant advertising" for a 13 year old piece software --Micky750k (talk) 13:59, 30 July 2008 (UTC)