User talk:JoeSmack: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by Whatdaboi - "" |
Railizardz 9 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 359: | Line 359: | ||
by the way do you now if a scarlet macaw is a generilist or a specialist? Kinda new at this, so please help. |
by the way do you now if a scarlet macaw is a generilist or a specialist? Kinda new at this, so please help. |
||
Thanks <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Whatdaboi|Whatdaboi]] ([[User talk:Whatdaboi|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Whatdaboi|contribs]]) 17:24, 21 October 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Thanks <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Whatdaboi|Whatdaboi]] ([[User talk:Whatdaboi|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Whatdaboi|contribs]]) 17:24, 21 October 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== October 2009 == |
|||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not add content without citing [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]] and [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|''reliable'' sources]], as you did to [[:List of Virtual Console games (North America)]]. Before making any potentially controversial [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|edits]], it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> '''<span style="border: 2px Maroon solid;background:#4682B4;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">[[User:TJ Spyke|<font color="Maroon">TJ</font>]] [[User talk:TJ Spyke|<font color="Maroon">Spyke</font>]]</span>''' 15:39, 23 October 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:40, 23 October 2009
![]() Archives |
---|
"See also" links
Hi justin. I tried IceChat but got only "Host not found". Am new to IRc and must do something wrong. Anyways, you found my list of links silly in the See also section in the article Suffering, and looking at it from your point of view I found it silly too. I tried something else and would like to have your opinion if you please. Robert Daoust 00:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Wow, thats actually a really nice little template. You don't even need it in the See Also section, just put it at the end of the article. Again, great template, I'm impressed. :) JoeSmack Talk 00:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. Template is put at the end. Robert Daoust 02:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
help
Lucky11052 (talk) 00:05, 14 October 2009 (UTC)i nneed to know how to make my own new "PAGE". how do i do that? thanks..LIKE A NEW ARTICLE.
Torrent
Please see User_talk:Nominaladversary#2007_Wikipedia_Selection
--BozMo talk 15:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
See my replies to your torrent link question. DuncanHarris 22:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Social Work
I notice you have contributed to the article Social work. I have created a new WikiProject, WikiProject Social Work. I have begun to work on this project and I would love to have your help. Please take a look at it and consider joining the project. Many thanks, Ursasapien (talk) 05:22, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Semi
ya i will remove it!(Sparrowman980 06:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC))
- No problem (Sparrowman980 06:50, 1 July 2007 (UTC))
Just popping by to let you know that the edits by User:Shangrilaista you reverted on Charles Ammi Cutter were constructive. I've restored them. — The Storm Surfer 00:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Ditto for his edit on Cutter Expansive Classification. GUllman 17:52, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Apologies; just about every other edit of his reverted with spam link additions. I'll try to be more careful in the future. JoeSmack Talk 20:25, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- By the way, there are also all COI link additions as the user is the librarian in charge of promoting the digital works she is adding. JoeSmack Talk 16:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
VRCOutreach
Hi Joe--be careful about using automated edit summaries when you're mass-reverting edits by new editors. While VRCOutreach may have had a conflict of interest, it's worth noting that that the links s/he added weren't spam or vandalism. (The NIH's Vaccine Research Center would seem to be at least relevant to the pages where the link was added, and it's a public agency.) It's important not to WP:BITE new editors by using edit summaries that imply that their good-faith edits are vandalism. Cheers, TenOfAllTrades(talk) 18:27, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- Don't think i was biting, and I would consider it spam even if it wasn't a clear COI (the links were being mass added to articles with very loose association in short amounts of time). Keep in mind spam doesn't need to be commercial to be spam. JoeSmack Talk 01:14, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
- I beg to differ—your heart was in the right place, and I agree that it's always suspicious when a new account starts adding lots of external links. Nevertheless, there's no indication of bad faith on the part of this new editor, so your automated edit summary indicating that you were reverting vandalism was indeed a (I presume unintentional) bite. I only ask that you take care with the automated edit summaries that you use in the future—how would you have liked being called a vandal after your very first edits to Wikipedia? TenOfAllTrades(talk) 02:15, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hmmm, people do not like that don't they. Truth be told I used the vandalism rollback on WP:TWINKLE because it is a bit fast than the normal one, which requires a manual edit summary for each rollback. I'll be more careful next time, and maybe I'll hack up my monobook a bit too. Thanks. JoeSmack Talk 16:19, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 20:29, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hi. This is VRCOutreach, and thank you both for the comments. Being a newbie to Wiki, I felt bad for inadvertently causing a COI to the links I had added. I only added the VRC link to pages that deal with vaccines, vaccine development, and the disease topics we are studying. I tried to be totally neutral in the way I described the links, thereby giving the visitor the decision on wether or not to visit our page for more information. Is that ok? It's awfully similar to the links other non-profits and causes are leaving on other pages, but please do let me know if there is a format that might work better. I'd love to be more involved in the Wiki community and we're really just trying to get information out to a wider audience. Thank you both again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by VRCOutreach (talk • contribs)
- Hi there! Don't feel bad, we were all new sometime. I can see that you tried to add them to topical articles, and that they we're described in such a way that was really balanced - and I thank you for considering both these things. It is still however a COI because your job (as I understand it) is to promote VRC. Let's see...think of it like this...I have a friend who is court videographer - he video tapes depositions. One time I asked him which law firm he worked under, and he gave me a weird face. He said, "oh, oh no, I work for an independent agency. You see, you can never really be quite sure how you could influence important evidence and records if you were a part of the defense or plaintiff - it is never done in-house for that reason"....You can never be sure how you might be influenced and therefor not neutral being so closely affiliated to VRC.
- Anyways, if you see non-profits and causes sprinkling their links all over vaccines pages, remove them because Wikipedia is not a soapbox (WP:NOT) and those kind of links usually serve as promotion. I've seen your link, and while regional websites (we can't have every country's associated website in the EL section, it'd be hundreds long!) don't usually stick, the NIH is one of those stars that does (kind of like the NY Times of the news world). I'm sure if you use the talk page of each article asking for a neutral party to add it because you have a COI, someone would independently deem it valuable, or would discuss it with you or whatnot. It isn't as fast but it keeps everything neutral.
- I hope I've been a help. We'd love if you could stay a while and be involved - perhaps by editing vaccine related articles with some of your specialized knowledge. It'd be extremely valuable. If you have any questions (related to this or not), don't hesitate to ask me here. I'd be glad to answer! :) JoeSmack Talk 15:17, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hi again! Thanks very much! I totally understand what you're saying and appreciate the Wiki process lesson. I'm definitely looking forward to being more involved. :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by VRCOutreach (talk • contribs)
Question Regarding and Edit...
Hi,
A couple of months ago, I stuck in a link to the Athenian Robotics Collective's website under The Athenian School article. The history shows that you removed it because it was 'spammy.' Being a novice editor, I was wondering what would constitute that comment. I reinserted the link, but hopefully it is not 'spammy' this time. Thanks.
Autopilot37 05:34, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
PS-- Question of interest, are you an alum of Athenian? You seem to have visited and edited the entry a lot.
WikBack account created
Someone, perhaps you, recently created an account at the WikBack. If the account was created by an imposter, please let me know as soon as possible so that it can be disabled. Otherwise, welcome! The Uninvited Co., Inc. 19:56, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sadbook.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sadbook.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 11:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Addressed. Thanks BCbot. JoeSmack Talk 13:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
steak Diane
Please stop fucking up my edits on steak diane. Thank you. --72.33.93.156 (talk) 19:54, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, your edits are pretty clearly vandalism. JoeSmack Talk 01:26, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Nobody likes a narc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.33.93.156 (talk) 17:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Test of automated article selection for WP:1.0
Joe,
We've been testing out a bot to select articles based on WikiProject assessments (quality and importance, with more emphasis on the latter). The lists are incomplete but the aim is simply to get the articles ranked correctly. Please can you take a look at these data and leave comments? Thanks a lot! Walkerma (talk) 17:23, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Bot activity
I was going over the list of bots and noticed that JoeBot (talk · contribs) has not edited in a very long time. Is this bot still active and if not, would you object to it being de-flagged? Please post your comments to Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Requests_for_approval#Dead_bots since this is a rather widely-posted message. MBisanz talk 06:45, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- De-flag. I've left comments there too. Thanks for the message! :) JoeSmack Talk 12:06, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
AIDS
AIDS has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 00:52, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Reply
I've replied to your request here. -- iMatthew T.C. 20:58, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
mainpage redesign
Hey, took a look: glad that you enjoyed my design enough to use it as a base. Maybe if you moved all the featured content to the right col and the about wiki below explore??? Also, a thing I dislike about the current page (and many proposals) is that they have columns with content that just continues - the sections are separated but that's just MHO.--88wolfmaster (talk) 02:47, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Survey request
Hi, JoeSmack I need your help. I am working on a research project at Boston College, studying creation of medical information on Wikipedia. You are being contacted because you have been identified as an important contributor to one or more articles.
Would you will be willing to answer a few questions about your experience? We've done considerable background research, but we would also like to gather the insight of the actual editors. Details about the project can be found at the user page of the project leader, geraldckane. Survey questions can be found at geraldckane/medsurvey. Your privacy and confidentiality will be strictly protected!
The questions should only take a few minutes. I hope you will be willing to complete the survey, as we do value your insight. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Professor Kane if you have any questions. Thank You, BCproject (talk) 17:34, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Main Page Redesign
Hey JoeSmack, I've updated my Main Page Redesign proposal substantially, and you had some really great points last time you commented - hopefully you'll see the effects of your suggestions. It would be great if you could comment on the new proposal, I'm really proud of how it's shaping up. Many thanks -- PretzelsTalk! 08:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Cochlear implant
Hi - just a little feedback - the operation to install a cochlear implant doesn't always destroy all residual hearing these days (certainly it used to). Depending on the person, some can sometimes be preserved (in the lower frequency region of the basilar membrane, where the electrodes don't go). That doesn't happen in the majority though, as far as I know. It's not a major point, I just saw your edit comment, thought you might be interested. All the best --mcld (talk) 21:47, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Kohlberg's GA Reassessment
Just in case you don't watch DoctorW's talk page ...
- I'd really like to thank you and JoeSmack for the work you've put into addressing the concerns I raised during this review. I know that my arrival must have seemed like a bolt out of the blue, but the GA criteria changed quite significantly in 2007, particularly in regard to citations, so there's an ongoing reassessment of every GA listed before the end of August 2007, which this one was. I'm a psychology graduate myself, so the last thing I want to see is Kohlberg's article delisted. The only remaining reservation I have over closing the current review as a "keep" is the two remaining uncited paragraphs. If they were moved to talk until sourcing could be discovered, or they were admitted to be original research, then I'd be happy to close the review now.
- I don't entirely agree with JoeSmack's point that it's tougher to get psychology-based articles through GA. My perception is that in general psychology-based articles are just not as well written or sourced as articles on "harder" sciences, but I don't see any obvious reason why they can't be. An article like this one, for instance, could fairly easily become a plausible GA candidate IMO; "cognitive dissonance" is a term I use not infrequently even today. :-) --Malleus Fatuorum 21:30, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
HIV GA Sweeps: On Hold
I have reviewed HIV for GA Sweeps to determine if it still qualifies as a Good Article. In reviewing the article I have found several issues, which I have detailed here. Since you are a main contributor of the article (determined based on this tool), I figured you would be interested in contributing to further improve the article. Please comment there to help the article maintain its GA status. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 18:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
You are very invited to join Spotlight IRC through #wikipedia-spotlight or Click here for instant access so we could collaborate on the article.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 16:11, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
...for taking the time to welcome me to Wikipedia and for the useful tip. Like my grandfather always says, "s'easy if you know how"! Devobaby (talk) 00:22, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for helping out at Feedback
I feel bad when I see a request with no answer - glad you are responding to some of those requests.--SPhilbrickT 17:08, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
UCore / Knowlengr Help
Thanks for the helpful edits of the draft UCore entry. I made the suggested revisions. - Mark Underwood (knowlengr) 21:11, 29 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knowlengr (talk • contribs)
From TWST48, Thank you!
Thanks for your helpful feedback and suggestions on my Wall Street Transcript entry. I'm going to make all of the edits you recommended. Quick question: When will the "new unreviewed article" tag be taken off the top of my entry? Thanks, again. TWST48 (talk) 17:16, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Beta test of 0.7?
Joe,
Apparently I was misinformed about the license status of Okawix, it is fully GPL and open source - my mistake. Okawix is the reader software. So if you can help with a beta test, after a download from here, that would be really helpful. Thanks, Walkerma (talk) 04:48, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Welcoming
![]() |
The Helping Hand Barnstar | |
For making our newest users feel welcome. May your talk page be blessed with inane, unsigned, perplexed and baffled queries forever more. Great stuff. Chzz ► 23:59, 9 October 2009 (UTC) |
- Heh, one can only hope! Thanks! :) JoeSmack Talk 00:00, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thanks for welcoming... and your message... I will try... - not to poke around [in bad manners] ;-)
Csight
Hawaii Samurai
Well hi I got your message. Please respond. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawaii Samurai (talk • contribs) 06:59, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Hawaii Samurai
Maybe another time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawaii Samurai (talk • contribs) 07:09, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Attachment theory
I've tried turning the tenets section into an ordinary section here. What do you think? Fainites barleyscribs 21:12, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- It has the added advantage of reducing the kilobytes down even further to 120,000. It was 126,000 when the FAC started.Fainites barleyscribs 21:29, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you!
did you really wrote all that just to welcome me? :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Underlying lk (talk • contribs) 21:13, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
THANKS BRAH, I'll be sure to keep that in mind. Copy Pasta. Catchhelllorelei (talk) 23:29, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Rouge test
I just changed Rouge test to "C-class", as I noted that it was unassessed; it almost certainly meets the B-class requirements, I simply didn't have time to run through all the checks for that at this time.
I suggest, perhaps after DYK, that you get a peer review, and look at heading towards good article status.
I just poked a DYK person, so that side of things should progress soon. Good luck with it, nice work. Chzz ► 07:01, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi Joe Smack
Hello it is Sally Summers here. I would just like to say thank you for your lovely message and advice. I really will take that to heart it was so kind of you making me so welcome on to wikipedia.
Thank you, Sally:) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sally Summers (talk • contribs) 17:22, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Welcoming.
Great job, keep it up!--TParis00ap (talk) 19:59, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks thanks! I do try. :) JoeSmack Talk 20:04, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Cookie for your efforts.--TParis00ap (talk) 22:02, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b4/Choco_chip_cookie.png/100px-Choco_chip_cookie.png)
TParis00ap has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Lucky11052 (talk) 00:03, 14 October 2009 (UTC) this is cool..hi real person! are you real really? or just saying?
Hawaii Samurai
Hay are you there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawaii Samurai (talk • contribs) 06:54, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
My articles
Ok I became a rookie buff on revolutions in Hawaii, I was thinking of making a list, I was surprised about how many there were here are some I created:
- Wilcox Rebellion of 1889-I heard about this one first
- 1895 Counter-Revolution in Hawaii-I was thinking of adding pictures taken during the revolution, for those civil war buffs, we got our own! (Hawaiian Civil War redirects to it.)
- Democratic Revolution of 1954 (Hawaii)-Who ever though a successful revolution could happen in the United States.
- Statehood Day Takeover (Hawaii)-this one gets points for trying.
Hawaii Samurai (talk) 07:21, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
I see actually I got an old book with picture of old Hawaii. It was difficult finding information about the most recent coup, I live here in Hawaii, born and raised, I feel I have an obligation to know and learn the history here. Talk to you tomorrow. I am making a new article called United States Invasion of Hawaii, it was another attempt to restore the monarchy by US intervention. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawaii Samurai (talk • contribs) 07:49, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you!
Thank you for the greeting! I will not hesitate to ask any questions if I am uncertain about something. I sporadically edited Wikipedia as an anonymous contributor for some time, so I hope that I have at least been exposed to the basics by now. Again, thank you! =) Major Seventh (talk) 14:36, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- My pleasure! JoeSmack Talk 16:09, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Attachment theory
Did you have much else to do? Shall I just re-nom or do you want to deal with it on talk?Fainites barleyscribs 20:01, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- Well unless a major rewrite is needed I suppose it's better to do it on the FAC page for others to see as it goes along.Fainites barleyscribs 20:39, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
EXCUSE ME JOE!
Lucky11052 (talk) 00:18, 14 October 2009 (UTC) NEED HELP! Excuse me for asking, but will someone please direct me on how I am to compose a new article for Wiki. Thanks. And I mean, a BRAND NEW article! :)
I like your welcome template.
I really like your welcome template. Is there anyway I can use the same? Hell In A Bucket (talk) 03:55, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Random Act of Kindness Barnstar
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
I confer this barnstar to JoeSmack for the best Wikipedia Welcome I could ever had!You go an extra mile to give a personalized welcome! Singtamil (talk) 05:32, 14 October 2009 (UTC) |
Thanks
Thanks for your welcome and introduction Joe. However, not every one on wikipedia is as welcoming. I got half way through writing my first entry on Astronomical Society of New South Wales, got called away so saved it noting in the comments that I was in the process of fleshing it out, and returned a few hours later to find it's been marked for deletion! Before I'd even finished writing it! So I've heard stories that wikipedia is a "closed shop" and "newbies" are jumped upon, and discouraged by some of the "old boys club". I was sceptical, but find on my first foray in wikipedia that they seem to be true. So thanks for your welcome, but the teeth-marks of your fellow-wikipedians tell me that newbies are not actually very welcome here. StarryMan (talk) 11:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Welcomes
Just a suggestion: before you welcome a new user, would it not be a good idea to check whether they have actually made any useful contribution? Mca kkchaitanya (talk · contribs) is the most recent one I have noticed. — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 13:55, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- I actually do. Usually if the username is a name I will, or if their first contrib looks like their userspace (lots of companies put up their 'ad' in userspace, ha). This one slipped by me as I'm sure a couple of others have, but technically spammers deserve a welcome too I suppose. If anything they can ask me about COI/RS. But thanks for letting me know. JoeSmack Talk 16:22, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Another Question
I was looking at some of Wikipedia's recent changes (for the whole site, under Special:RecentChanges), and I saw that some of the changes had green positive numbers attached to them, and a few had red negative numbers. How do those get there? Are they put there by users?Tressif (talk) 21:17, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
DYK for rouge test
SoWhy 15:28, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
_
Thx :)
- Anton Vodonosov (Avodonosov (talk) 23:38, 15 October 2009 (UTC))
Thanks
Thanks a lot for your welcome and explanations :). Actually, I have some question : in your message, you speak about "playing" in my own area. How is that possible ? Can you explain me, please ? I would be grateful... --Olrys (talk) 00:18, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks a lot again! :)--Olrys (talk) 00:36, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Test
Hello, this is a test message I suppose.
- Alrighty then, here's my reply AeroArrow (talk) 05:24, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
AeroArrow (talk) 05:17, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Disorg attachment
User:Fainites/Sandbox Here is the remains of an article on this subject I started putting topgether on another wiki. Maybe we can finish one day. Fainites barleyscribs 16:49, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Some more to think about on the Attachment theory talkpage.Fainites barleyscribs 21:25, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Re: Results?
I just wanted to ping you to let you know that I replied to a question you posted on the NICE documentation talk page. --EpochFail (talk|contribs) 19:57, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Just wanted to say thanks for the welcoming message and information on getting started! I really appreciate it, so thanks again :)
Epicsleewear (talk) 04:23, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey Joesmack
Thanks for saying hi, by the way do you now if a scarlet macaw is a generilist or a specialist? Kinda new at this, so please help. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whatdaboi (talk • contribs) 17:24, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
October 2009
Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to List of Virtual Console games (North America). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TJ Spyke 15:39, 23 October 2009 (UTC)