Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:53, 7 January 2010

Current requests

Emerald Editor

I am currently developing Crimson Editor and would like the content of Emerald Editor userfied so I can use it. I will be creating a redirect from Emerald Editor to Crimson Editor since Emerald Editor is not presently notable. Bridgeplayer (talk) 15:38, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing worthwhile there for you Bridgeplayer. The entire article reads

Emerald Editor is to be a an open-source replacement for Crimson Editor licensed under the GNU General Public License. Crimson Editor was opensourced on December 29, 2006, but it is built with MFC and therefore is tied to Windows. Emerald Editor will be multiplatform. It is about to start the design phase.

Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:31, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help, anyway. Bridgeplayer (talk) 22:06, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anchalee Voogd

Anchalee Voogd - Thai Figure Skater this was the "reason" it was deleted. Non-encyclopedic vanity article created by a not-very-notable skater to promote herself) if I valid reason then the folowing pages should also be deleted...at least of the Thai skaters. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phanyaluck_Raisuksiri http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Alisara_Arirachakaran if you do not consider it a valid reason then I would also like to do pages on all the skaters on this page: tracings.net/thailand.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.24.52.170 (talk) 17:48, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

restored as contested prod, has competed at the highest level for her national team so i can't see how she cannot be notable. Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:28, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Raunch Studio

deleted as advertising? I think

Please tell me what I have done wrong the page that I included the article in was for Recording `studios in London" I thought it was ok to name my own studio here/ I am sorry if this breaks rules I saw all the other studios mentioned and added mine? many thanks Phil

Not done. Wikipedia isn't a place to advertise. Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:06, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sentrigo

This page was deleted via PROD, and unfortunately I did not see the notice at the time.

As the original author, I attempted to write this article from a neutral POV, following several examples of company overview pages in Wikipedia.

Done restored as contested prod Spartaz ^Humbug! 15:24, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SamCERA

I wasn't even notified that it was going to be deleted, and didn't get a chance to protest or refute.

It took me a lot of work to setup that page, please restore it. I don't understand the reason for deletion in the first place.

Here is the reason: 14:59, August 18, 2009 Lifebaka (talk | contribs) deleted "SamCERA" ‎ (Expired PROD, concern was: unnotable organisation)

I don't know what "unnotabel organisation" is? SamCERA has been around for over 65 years.

Thanks for any help.

Donebut its vulnerable to being deleted permanently if you don't find some decent sourcing for it. Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:43, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Eveswing/Here (2009 film)

There article is still under-construction and would lie to expand further on it. Thanks. eveswing(talk) 10:46, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done When you put a db tag on the page you asked for it to be deleted. I have undeleted it and moved it into main-space for you. next time you need {{helpme}} :-) Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:40, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. eveswing(talk) 13:29, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Participatory democracy

I added a reference on this page on November 28, 2009. It relates to my opinion that the concept "participatory democracy" is in fact a pleonasm! Indeed, according to me, democracy demands participation by the citizens. I justify this opinion in an article which I placed in the section "external references".

Now, somebody erased it on November 29, 2009 explaining that "Wikipedia is not a place to disseminate your own papers"!

- First, I would have appreciated being informed by this person when he(she) unilaterally decided to erase my contribution. He(she) could also have asked me why I feel this inclusion is usefull for all. Am I not supposed to be a responsible contributor?

- Second, does the fact that I am the author of this added reference prevent me automatically from being authorized to insert it? If yes, it is rather strange!

Best regards,

--PhDG (talk) 18:03, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not doneThis page is only for dealing with deleted articles. For removed content you need to speak to the editor that removed your edit or leaving a note on the article talk page. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:14, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I was the editor who removed the link in question, and I have responded at length at Talk:Participatory democracy. Tb (talk) 00:53, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LEO Learn Enrich Optimize

The article was nominated and deleted under "section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company". But this is not the case LEO - Listen Enrich Optimize is a registered service mark and a new business consulting process which has received attention from various personalities and media.

The Unites States patent and Trademark Office - www.uspto.gov mentions LEO as - IC 035. US 100 101 102. G & S: BUSINESS CONSULTING RELATING TO IMPROVING BUSINESS PERFORMANCE. FIRST USE: 20051101. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20051101

LEO - Listen Enrich Optimize was first introduced by Management Consultant and eminet author Subir Chowdhury in his book The Ice Cream Maker

And if this is restored, it should be restored to LEO Listen Enrich Optimize, and not LEO Learn Enrich Optimize — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arijit (talk • contribs)

user:Floydian/Kawartha Lakes Road 8

Need my user space page undeleted. I forgot that I was using this as a demonstration to show a difference in template behaviours, and requested it be deleted for housekeeping purposes. Need it back to save myself half an hour of making a new one. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 19:10, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:38, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArcSoft ShowBiz

I found [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], and [6]. This was deleted by prod. Joe Chill (talk) 04:54, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Restored as a contested prod. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:11, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PhotoImpression

I found [7], [8], [9], and [10]. I would have asked the deleting admin to restore it, but I saw that he didn't reply to two previous undeletion requests from a different editor. This was deleted by prod. Joe Chill (talk) 04:56, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Restored as a contested prod Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:12, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Money Masters

I am not sure why this article was deleted, but it was about an important documentary that points out exactly who in the world controls our money supply in North America. This article should not be deleted, there is no reason for it to be deleted, and it is important that the article stay up so as to further educate the American people as to how to solve our problems of inflation, debt, and financial crisis. There are a multitude of other articles which summarize similar documentaries:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeitgeist,_the_Movie#Zeitgeist:_Addendum

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_end_of_suburbia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wal-Mart:_The_High_Cost_of_Low_Price

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Killed_the_Electric_Car%3F

Along with many more that I cannot possibly list within this message. It is to my understanding that Wikipedia prides itself in the free education of all people, so please, PUT THIS ARTICLE BACK UP AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. REMOVE THE RESTRICTIONS, AND ALLOW THE COMMAN MAN TO SEE THE ARTICLE ONCE AGAIN.

Not donethis was originally deleted through a deletion discussion so this isn't suitable for REFUND. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Money Masters. If you want this back you will need to present a decent sourced draft to DRV. Since this has been recreated several times by a banned user I suspect the bar will be set higher for this one. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:32, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I am a new user on this forum and I do not know how to work any of the functions, or rules, on this site, and I want you to tell me personally why you think this article should be deleted. I would like to ask you if you have seen the video, because, in my humble opinion, this video needs to be seen by everyone, and I have withdrawn from my humble dredges of everyday life to ask you why this article has been deleted, and why the video doesn't deserve to get an extra 100,000 hits on the general internet as a result of this article. Again, I am asking this independent of all Wikipedia opinions and rules. I am an independent supporter of this video, and am not affiliated with the video or its creators. I am simply an independent, concerned citizen. Please send me a reply AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. JChuchman 07:34, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone on the website who is capable of writing drafts to DRV with sources, please help me restore this article!!! JChuchman 07:39, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - this article has already been taken to DRV, where deletion was endorsed, and has been create-protected because it was re-created so often. JohnCD (talk) 14:23, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Impulse Tracker

Not done - this article was deleted at AfD, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impulse Tracker - if you want to challenge that, you should first approach the closing admin, Spartaz (talk · contribs), and if he does not agree you will have to take it to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 14:29, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that even the keep voters in that discussion acknowledged that the article lacked the basic reliable sourcing to meet our inclusion criteria. Spartaz ^Humbug! 15:08, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pentaho

I found [11], [12], [13], [14], and [15]. This was deleted by prod. Joe Chill (talk) 14:12, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done restored as a contested prod Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:34, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the Spider's Web

I found [16], [17], [18], and [19]. This was deleted by CSD because it was created by a banned user. Deleting articles by a banned user is not a good thing to do if the subject is notable. Joe Chill (talk) 16:05, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Policy prescribes the deletion of material posted by banned users and its outside the purview of REFUND to overrule that but in this case there is nothing lost as the deleted material is simply a redirect. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:36, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't understand why Wide Area Multilateration was deleted

Wide Area Multilateration - This page was deleted with the following reason: "A tag has been placed on Wide Area Multilateration, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article." The article simply described a technology, much like other pages that describe technologies (see "Multilateration", "TCAS", "ADS-B"). It does not promote a company, product, group, service, or person. If it was deleted due to lack of references, please let me know as there are a number of additional ones that can be added.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ludmilovna (talk • contribs)

I don't see the unambiguous advertising here, so your best bet for an answer to this is to ask either the person who requested deletion, Ironholds (talk · contribs), or the deleting admin, Fastily (talk · contribs), if they can give you more information on this. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:52, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And I now see you've already contacted both of them.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:54, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

David Cole (revisionist)

First, I must admit right up front that I have never seen the deleted article. It was very short-lived (about a week from establishment to deletion, and the User that established it was similarly short-lived). I was surprised today when seeking an article on the subject, whom I regard as notable, and finding none. While I am not David Cole, nor have I ever met, seen, spoken to, or knowingly corresponded with him in person, I have some knowledge of what an accurate article on this subject would have contained. His work is very controversial, such that a person whose POV opposed Holocaust revisionism would favor suppression of information about him and his work. Most of his work is currently viewable on YouTube.

I reviewed the Discussion of the Deletion (3 weeks ago), and I was struck by something about the four votes to Delete: one was from the person who apparently tried to initiate the Deletion; two others were from Users now permanently blocked, of which one was a sock puppet for a User permanently banned at that time; and the last was from a User whose contributions I have some previous familiarity with whose NPOV in matters involved with the Holocaust I regretfully find questionable.

I request that this article be restored. If it is restored, it may confidently be expected to be Nominated for Deletion in very short order, at which time perhaps a more judicious consideration of the nomination may be undertaken.--Joe (talk) 15:50, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since David Cole (revisionist) was deleted as a result of the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Cole (revisionist), this is not something we can unilaterally restore here. If you think the discussion was closed in error, talk to the closing admin, JForget (talk · contribs), and then if you still aren't satisfied you can take it to deletion review. (But talk to JForget first, because if you don't, deletion review will kick out your request.) HTH. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:48, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A.C. Read Golf Course History

Hi. Please undelete "A.C. Read Golf Course History" ... I was in the middle of standing it up this afternoon and had just posted a "talk" input to request it not be deleted while I was standing it up.... and ... an administrator deleted it. If sports history is not befitting wikipedia...let me know. If so, I think you are making a mistake and make sure you don't tell the book writers, magazine article writers, and the fans of golf. garryshaf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garryshaf (talk • contribs)

Not doneI'm sorry but individual golf courses do not meet our inclusion criteria. Spartaz ^Humbug! 15:07, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Los Angeles

Template that was deleted via {{deprecated}}. User requesting restoration of template at Template talk:WikiProject California#WPLA. -Optigan13 (talk) 05:34, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ayttm

This was deleted via PROD but there was no notification of the same (I was watching the Talk page as well as the article). There should be at least some advance notification/discussion before such an action is taken.

--Siddheshp (talk) 12:15, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done - I don't know why you say there was no notification - the PROD template was on the article for the full seven days from 22 Dec. However, I have restored it per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion and will notify the editor who PRODded it in case he wishes to take it to AfD. JohnCD (talk) 12:38, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was in my list but no people read ... — Neustradamus (✉) 17:11, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bunch of userfication requests from Neustradamas

I put this long indiscriminate list in the right place. Am discussing with requester what he wants to do with them all as its a long indiscriminate list that will take a lot of time to fulfil. Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:12, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content

On my user sub page — Neustradamus (✉) 21:05, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

new request, all XMPP article for wiki.xmpp.org and other articles ... You can read about XMPP : http://planet.jabber.org/ and https://stpeter.im/index.php/2009/12/22/routing-around-wikipedia/ and mailing list ... — Neustradamus (✉) 17:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- Do you mean you want to transwiki all the articles somewhere else? If so, I'll do it but it may take a little time. I think I already mentioned that if its not a wiki, you will need to include the list of contributors for each article to comply with our license? Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:25, 2 January 2010 (UTC) Yes, that does seem to be the idea. Ok am going to start progressing this list but it will take a little while. Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:27, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
'I made a start. Its in progress now. Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:41, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sierra Repertory Theatre

I have tried to write this article in a similar style to the Wikipedia entries for Berkeley Repertory Theatre and Seattle Repertory Theatre. I have also cited the references that were missing in the original entry. I'm not sure why this article was deleted considering the other theatre's entries.

Not currently deleted.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Williams (Marketer)

The page was of a notable figure

Done. Restored on request, as the page was deleted by PROD. The reason stated was "can see no evidence of notability - seems to be advertising". I will notify the editor who PRODded the article, in case he wishes to take it to WP:AFD. JohnCD (talk) 20:37, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brendan Hogan

Please userfy to User:Huw Powell/Brendan Hogan in case he achieves notability so I can start again easily. Twas speedied for lack of notability. Thank you for your time. Huw Powell (talk) 00:57, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done Spartaz ^Humbug! 12:06, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Hmmm, it's at Huw Powell/Brendan Hogan, is that correct? Shouldn't it be User:Huw Powell/Brendan Hogan? Sorry to bother you with another question. Huw Powell (talk) 23:14, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've boldly assumed it was meant to go to User:Huw Powell/Brendan Hogan and moved in there. Feel free to move it back if I'm wrong, Spartaz.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:43, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much Fabrictramp, and thanks for the alert on my talk page. I appreciate everyone's kind help with this. Happy wikiing! Huw Powell (talk) 22:53, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mapilathoad

— Preceding unsigned comment added by AARiyaz (talk • contribs)

I'm a bit mystified on this one, so I've left a question for the deleting admin.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've now heard from the deleting admin, and the only concern I have left is that I can't find a single reliable source showing the existence of this place. If you can point me to a reliable source or two, I'll gladly rewrite the article myself.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:45, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nimi Visuals

Greetings, luckily Polish Wikipedia Users help me to find this page. (via Polish equivalent of this page) I would like to appology for my English - ain't native, and my wiki system using skills aren't that good(that's why I used Polish page to get help to navigate here)

One of the administrators (if I understand correctly) deleted added by me entry on software I'm one of developers, using some speedy procedure. It made me really worried and concerned as in past I recall entry was checked (when I was updating entry I saw this in history) and I don't recall any problems reported earlier. I always tried to write objective, giving reference to written content and focus on overall overview. Just how I find encyclopedic entries in Wikipedia - I mean informative and not out from nowhere. By so it's hard for me to believe that whole entry would be matching this category - and I always thought that before deletion entries are discussed or something. I'm very willing and cooperative User (I'm developer overall) and I always prefer civilized solutions rather than other.

Entry included history, it's features, references in press and websites etc. My most concern is caused as it is only such software on its platform - there is only one commercial equivalent from what I know on its platform, and from what I noticed some of the Users of other platforms aren't fans of it (overall it's effect engine). I've tried contacting with User whom deleted this entry - without much result - humbly asking for more detailed explanation of this removal and eventual suggestions how it should be written to be available on Wikipedia. Unhappily I didn't get any response.

Furthermore, it made me even more worried as I googled and found - that this User (I'm just saying what was in Google results) involved into similar situations in past.

I would really greatly appreciate any help in resolving this matter I would really like that it would be at last mentioned to be existing on Wikipedia, especially as I always tried to be a good (maybe not extraordinary active) member of Wiki community.

User name: anetode

Entry: Nimi Visuals Yours, truly Yours, Samantha— Preceding unsigned comment added by Samiwieciekto (talk • contribs)

I can't say that I see the unambiguous advertising, but we do have the issue of conflict of interest. Since you are one of the developers of the software, it will be just about impossible for you to write about this in an unbiased manner, and the English Wikipedia strongly discourages you from writing about subjects where you have a conflict of interest.

I only see that you contacted the deleting today, and s/he has not edited since December 30. Admins are all volunteers, and many are enjoying the New Year's holiday with their families, so you may need to give it more than just a few hours for a reply. If you can't work it out with the deleting admin, you can always take it to WP:DRV, but you will have an uphill battle there because of the conflict of interest. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Pendragon

Please restore the Article on American publisher, author and poet, Michael Pendragon.

Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.82.125.247 (talk • contribs) 03:20, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Restored on request, as the article was deleted by PROD. I will notify the editor who PRODded it, and the one who added a supporting PROD2, in case either of them wishes to take it to AfD. JohnCD (talk) 11:13, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mirthala Salinas

Page was deleted twice. Once for PROD reasons of BLP1E, and another for BLP concerns. I request that the first version be restored. Although she dated Los Angeles mayor Antonio Villaraigosa (the supposedly 1E), she is notable in her own right as a news anchor for KVEA in Los Angeles. However whatever (talk) 19:30, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not done If a long paragraph about the scandal, and a shorter one about her other "romantic relationships" with "other (named) well-known Los Angeles based California politicians" were removed (from the first version), what would be left would be a three-liner saying where she was born, educated, and worked. I don't think just being a news anchor is notable - see WP:ENTERTAINER. This article was more suitable for a gossip-sheet than an encyclopedia. (This was the right place to ask for undeletion --WP:Deletion review would be the next step if you want to pursue it). JohnCD (talk) 16:46, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PetGadgets

Hello I'm hoping you can release our PetGadgets article posting availability. A few years ago we had an untrained worker who did not adhere to the Wiki rules and thus the article was flagged as promotion. We just want to have the ability to update our company info. We have started a new one under the user name http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kozmoscorner which is what we would like to be put on or moved to the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PetGadgets url . Thanks for your help on this matter. I look forward to hearing from you. Geoff, President PetGadgets.com

The draft article does not currently pass WP:CORP notability standards. Are there any reliable, independent secondary sources that have written about your company? –Xeno(talk) 14:38, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Xeno, Thanks for your reply. Yes, are site is continually mentioned by the mainstream media both in print and on-air. Here is just a partial listing of all the top places that have discussed our site from NBC's PetSide, Readers Digest, MSNBC, CNET, The Early Show on CBS, Fox & Friends, Digital Trends, ABC News Now, Pet Product News which is considered the pet industry bible.

Below are some links:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23674521/#storyContinued
http://www.foxnews.com/search-results/m/24237614/pet-gadgets.htm#q=pet
http://www.petside.com/bowl-and-collar/top_10_pet_gadget_gifts.php
http://www.petgadgets.com/news/PetGadgetsPetProductNews.cfm
http://www.petgadgets.com/news/abcworldnews.cfm
http://podcasts.digitaltrends.com/podcast/273/gadgets-and-technology-for-dogs

You'll need to add these references to the article and also make some assertion of notability. If you think your article meets WP:CORP standards, you can then move it into the mainspace - however; this will not prevent another editor tagging it for speedy deletion or filing a deletion discussion if they feel it still does not meet our inclusion criteria. –xeno^talk 17:42, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

N No action needed - page was not salted. –xeno^talk 19:43, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One Last Shot

The article on local Syracuse, NY band "One Last Shot" has been deleted despite it being factually based and used as a resource on the bands website as a place to go to learn about the band. There were no facts on the page that we wrong, inappropriate, or frivolous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.106.202.197 (talk • contribs) 17:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done As the article was deleted by the Proposed Deletion procedure, restoration on request is automatic. I'm not sure the "history" section qualifies as "not frivolous", but that's by the way: the point is that just being correct is not enough, to have a Wikipedia article a subject has to be notable, the standard for bands is set out at WP:BAND, and I'm afraid, with their first EP yet to be released, One Last Shot don't make it (yet). So I have started a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Last Shot. These discussions normally run for seven days; you are welcome to comment there, but before you do, please read WP:Notability and WP:Notability (music). JohnCD (talk) 20:44, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shaun Rogerson

I would like to Request that the article Shaun Rogerson is moved to User:Sfxprefects/Shaun_Rogerson2 so i can improved the article thanks Sfxprefects (talk) 19:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done since you already have the nearly-identical User:Sfxprefects/Shaun Rogerson, but I must warn you that I think you are flogging a dead horse here. This has already been deleted five times and has been through Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaun Rogerson. If you reintroduce it, it will be speedy-deleted WP:CSD#G4 unless something dramatic has happened to mean that he meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:ENTERTAINER. Just adding a few more local newspaper references is not going to save it. JohnCD (talk) 12:01, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Galeazzo von Mörl

This article concerns a well known painter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexandre GASTAUD (talk • contribs) 06:24, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article gave no indication that he was notable in Wikipedia's sense, which is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Can you provide independent references? JohnCD (talk) 12:08, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some links: Artprice auction records, AskArt auction records, Critic 1, Critic 2 (in french)--Alexandre GASTAUD (talk) 13:25, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done I have restored it and marked it "under construction" which will protect it for a few days while you add references. These may save it from speedy deletion, but I'm not sure they are enough to save it at an WP:Articles for deletion debate: if you can find more, it will help. The standard you are aiming for is WP:CREATIVE. JohnCD (talk) 22:45, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sanmesh Kalyanpur

The article pertained to a National Bravery Award winner in India who is perhaps one of few Indians to win both the Bravery Awards viz. Prime Minster's National Bravery Award and President of India's Jeevan Raksha Medal.

Links to all newspaper articles were also provided. I would hence be interested to knwo why the page was deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkalyanpur (talk • contribs) 10:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The article was deleted as a result of a deletion debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanmesh Kalyanpur. If you want to challenge that decision, you should take it to WP:Deletion review. If you are related to the subject, please read WP:Conflict of Interest. JohnCD (talk) 11:30, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I should have added that your first step should be to approach JForget (talk · contribs), the administrator who closed the deletion debate, and invite him to reconsider his decision. If he is not willing to do that, then you should go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 11:40, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:RedPolly/Etersoft

The page User:RedPolly/Etersoft was created as a draft. The name of the page "User:Redpolly/..." is an analog to the "Special:MyPage/..." in Russian Wikipedia. So the page was in development, but I haven't saved the copy. So I'd like to ask if the text of this article can be restored as Special:MyPage/Etersoft.

RedPolly (talk• contribs)

Not done. User:RedPolly/Etersoft is quite correct for the name of a user sub-page - "Special:MyPage/Etersoft" is just a shortcut to get the same result. But that subpage was deleted per WP:CSD#G11 as an advertisement, which is not permitted even in user space. If you want it back, you should talk to Lectonar (talk · contribs), the admin who deleted it. JohnCD (talk) 17:20, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Real Lives

Could an administrator restore the old deleted page history? The article was deleted in 2007 after an AfD, and has now been recreated with sources showing notability. --Apoc2400 (talk) 14:30, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done JohnCD (talk) 17:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MoneyTV with Donald Baillargeon

The article above was a concise and complete description of a long running, internationally broadcast television program. I cannot understand why the article was deleted, nor do I agree with it being done.

17:55, 21 December 2009 MrKIA11 (talk | contribs) deleted "MoneyTV with Donald Baillargeon" ‎ (Expired PROD, concern was: No indication this meets the general notability guideline or the notability criteria for organizations and companies.)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbmedia (talk • contribs)

Done The article was deleted under the WP:Proposed deletion process, so is automatically restored on request. I will notify the editor who PRODded it, in case he wishes to nominate it under the WP:Articles for deletion process. JohnCD (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Raven Clan

I will like to edit it more because this is my first time using this. and i also dont have a saved copy. Please Help

@@ Line 323: / Line 323: @@
 *{{done}} The article was deleted under the [[WP:Proposed deletion]] process, so is automatically restored on request. I will notify the editor who PRODded it, in case he wishes to nominate it under the [[WP:Articles for deletion]] process. [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 17:37, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
-== Please help ogan 234 ==
+== New Raven Clan ==
-Artical=New Raven clan. I will like to edit it more because this is my first time using this. and i also dont have a saved copy.
+I will like to edit it more because this is my first time using this. and i also dont have a saved copy.
+Please Help