User talk:The Transhumanist/Archive 25: Difference between revisions
Bridgeplayer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 330: | Line 330: | ||
== Glaciers of Saint Helena listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] == |
== Glaciers of Saint Helena listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] == |
||
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect [[Glaciers of Saint Helena]]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Glaciers of Saint Helena'' redirect, you might want to participate in [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 June 23#Glaciers of Saint Helena|the redirect discussion]] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> [[User:Bridgeplayer|Bridgeplayer]] ([[User talk:Bridgeplayer|talk]]) 20:10, 23 June 2010 (UTC) |
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect [[Glaciers of Saint Helena]]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Glaciers of Saint Helena'' redirect, you might want to participate in [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 June 23#Glaciers of Saint Helena|the redirect discussion]] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> [[User:Bridgeplayer|Bridgeplayer]] ([[User talk:Bridgeplayer|talk]]) 20:10, 23 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
Lord Chaitanya knows everything that happens in all three phases (past, present, and future, of time. He knows that in the future some demoni people will serve Lord Advaita. |
|||
Text 123 |
|||
They will refer to Lord Advaita by the name "Shri Krishna". In this way they will reject the words of the true Vaishnavas. |
|||
Text 124 |
|||
These sinners will thus disobey the devotees who affirm that Advaita is "the greatest Vaishnava". |
|||
Text 125 |
|||
Many persons will consider themselves the followers of Lord Advaita, but they will not have the power to see how in the future they will be punished. |
|||
Text 126 |
|||
Lord Chaitanya, the crest jewel of they who know everything, knew all this. Therefore He did something to try to stop this from happening. |
|||
Text 127 |
|||
By punishing His mother, Lord Chaitanya showed the result that comes from offending Lord Advaita or any other Vaishnava. |
|||
Text 128 |
|||
No one can protect a person who has offended a Vaishnava. |
|||
Text 129 |
|||
Therefore one should avoid persons who offend Vaishnava. |
|||
Text 130 |
|||
One should avoid an offender, even if the offender is otherwise very qualified. A little association with an offender will make one fall down. |
|||
Text 131 |
|||
Who has the power to understand why the Lord gives punishment? By punishing His mother, He taught everyone. |
|||
Text 132 |
|||
Anyone who blasphemes they who use the word `Vaishnava" to address Lord Advaita will be punished. He will perish. |
|||
Text 133 |
|||
Lord Chaitanya is theSupreme Personality of Godhead, the master of all. To be called His follower is very great praise. |
|||
Text 134 |
|||
Without any intention to deceive, Lord Chaitanya openly said that Lord Nityananda is the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself. |
|||
Text 135 |
|||
By Lord Nityananda's mercy I know Lord Chaitanya. By Lord Nityananda's mercy I know the Vaishnavas. |
|||
Text 136 |
|||
By Lord Nityananda's mercy offenses are destroyed. By Lord Nityananda's mercy one attains devotion to Lord Vishnu. |
|||
Text 137 |
|||
Blasphemy directed to Lord Nityananda's servants never enters my mouth. Day and night I happily sing Lord Chaitanya's glories |
|||
Text 138 |
|||
I carefully serve Lord Nityananda's devotees. Lord Chaitanya is the life and wealth of Lord Nityananda's servants. |
|||
Text 139 |
|||
A person who has only a little good fortune will not become Lord Nityananda's servant, for Lord Nityananda's servant is able to see Lord Chaitanya. |
|||
Text 140 |
|||
Anyone who hears this story of Lord Visvarupa becomes a servant of the limitless Supreme Personality of Godhead. He feels that Lord Nityananda is his very life. |
|||
Text 141 |
|||
Lord Nityananda and Lord Visvarupa do not have different bodies. This Mother Saci knew. Some other great souls also knew. |
|||
Text 142 |
|||
Glory to Lord Nityananda, who takes shelter of Lord Chaitanya! Glory, glory to Lord Nityananda, who is thousand-faced Ananta Sesha! |
|||
Text 143 |
|||
O Lord Nityananda, O king of Gauda-desa, glory to You! Who can attain Lord Chaitanya without first attaining Your mercy? |
|||
Text 144 |
|||
Anyone who loses Lord Nityananda will not be happy in this life. |
|||
Text 145 |
|||
Will I some day see Lord Chaitanya, Lord Nityananda, and their associates all thogether in one place? |
|||
Text 146 |
|||
Lord Chaitanya is my master. With great faith and hope I meditate on Him within my heart. |
|||
Text 147 |
|||
I bow down before Lord Advaita's feet. I pray that he will always be dear to me and that He will always stay in my thoughts. |
|||
Text 148 |
|||
The two moons Shri Krishna Chaitanya and Shri Nityananda are my life and soul. I, Vrindavana dasa, sing the glories of Their feet. |
Revision as of 13:40, 2 July 2010
User:Rich Farmbrough/temp16 Rants:
"Unencyclopedic" is meaningless in an argument, really. Basically it means "anything not worthy of being included in an encyclopedia", which is synonymous with "should not be included" or "I want it deleted". So when you use it as a justification for deleting something, it's a circular argument: "Delete, because I want it deleted". This is just repeating yourself. What we want to know are your reasons why you think something shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Simply answer the question, What's wrong with it?
HeyaHi. I'm glad to see you're back. I was planning to post here in the next few days. Hope you had a good wikibreak (relaxing, aren't they!) :) Regarding the rfc, I'm having a very slow/steady conversation with Karanacs at User talk:Karanacs#Outline bump. I'm hoping she'll reply to my last lengthy post there soon. I'd really like to disentangle the 2 issues (outlines, navigational pages) before we progress any further with actually drafting the rfc(s). I suggest/counsel patience with that part. (She's busy with arbcom cases currently). We could use assistance dealing with Wikipedia talk:Outlines#Problem with lack of suitable attribution, GFDL though, if you have some time. And other general outline improvement. Anything that doesn't step on toes, for now :) Have a good 'un. -- Quiddity (talk) 19:51, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
I've replied at Wikipedia talk:Outlines#Problem with lack of suitable attribution, GFDL. -- Quiddity (talk) 20:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Verbal is not an admin. -- Quiddity (talk) 00:25, 16 February 2010 (UTC) Asked and answered at Wikipedia_talk:Copyright_problems#Repairing_insufficient_attribution_-_admin_required?. -- Quiddity (talk) 04:35, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Whilst you're updating country outlines, perhaps you could also help out with fixing their accreditations? List (C-Z still to go) and instructions at Wikipedia talk:Outlines#Fixing accreditation. Thanks! -- Quiddity (talk) 17:08, 5 May 2010 (UTC) RfD nomination of Glaciers of GabonI have nominated Glaciers of Gabon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 05:50, 7 December 2009 (UTC) Coaching pageNot sure what to do with User:SMcCandlish/Coaching now that I'm actually in a position to do admin duties regularly and thus interested in doing an RfA. My coaching page has you mentioning assignments at a backlink, but not link seems to be there, and all the coaching related stuff seems to be different these days, so I'm not entire sure what the next step is. :-) I have 4+ years under my belt as an editor across all the namespaces, but I figure anyone can still learn from another's tips and tricks. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ Contribs. 10:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC) check out this thread at the village pump?I thought you'd be interested since it revives this discussion we had in July at Wikipedia Talk:Content forking. (I don't suggest you spend too much time re-reading the old thread, since I've clarified and re-stated the issues in the meantime.) cheers, Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 21:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC) Cyprus outlineHi Long time no talk ! Anyway I have just been looking at the Cyprus outline and see there are lots of red links and missing bits - without getting too far into debate at this point I wondered if any plans were in your head for going over the article or if I am free to go ahead and edit it - I will of course ref the guidelines etc and would be grateful if there was anything i should know about the article before I go ahead. Chaosdruid (talk) 23:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC) AfD nomination of List of basic geography topicsLOBT OOK
February 2010You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Outline of geography. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Verbal chat 08:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
The article Glaciers of Somaliland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing Proposed deletion of Glaciers of Liberia and othersThe article Glaciers of Liberia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing The article Outline of life extension has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing Articles for deletion nomination of Outline of life extensionVandalismPlease cease referring to good faith edits as vandalism. Any good faith edit with the intent of improving the encyclopedia is not vandalism - even if that edit is horribly, terribly damaging. It is very, very rare that contributiors with more than a few weeks of experience at Wikipedia is comitting vandalism. Please review WP:NOTVAND. Hipocrite (talk) 20:48, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Graphic DesignerHi. You say here that you're looking for a graphic designer. I'm not totally familiar with what you're looking for but am well qualified technically and looking to learn as much as a can about wikipedia (as a budding transhumanist). My capabilities and portfolio can be found here at the bottom of the section. let me know what you need on my talkpage Wmcleod (talk) 02:10, 2 March 2010 (UTC) Help TOTD
Articles for deletion nomination of Outline of the Cocos (Keeling) IslandsHello, The Transhumanist! Just reminding you that you are listed as a member of the Random Picture of the Day! It would be great if you could add a picture or too! Put the template on your user page with {{User:Presidentman/potd/template}}, and encourage other users to add pictures. You can also put our userbox on your userpage using: {{User:Presidentman/Ubx/RPOTD}}. Hopefully you'll help out! Talk to you later, Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day 21:56, 25 March 2010 (UTC) - Talk to you later, Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day 21:53, 25 March 2010 (UTC) RfD nomination of Glaciers of LiberiaI have nominated Glaciers of Liberia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Elen of the Roads (talk) 17:50, 27 March 2010 (UTC) User pageHow do you make a talk page like this with a background? HTML usage? Indigochild 02:10, 12 April 2010 (UTC) DemographicsHello, I saw your name on Wikipedia:WikiProject Demographics and thought you may be able to help. I've been taking a class on sociology latley, and that sparked my interest in exploring the demographics of the United States Marine Corps. However, I'm not really sure where to go as a starting point... as in, what is demographically relevant? Gender, race/ethnicity, rank, occupational specialty? What should I avoid? What would be redundant to Demographics of the United States? My main reference will be the Marine Corps Almanac (the final chaper in all but the oldest three volumes)... I don't merely want to parrot statistics, but have to walk a fine line against OR and synth. Any insight you might have would be suprememly helpful. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 18:35, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
help requestHello, Who is the best person to talk to regarding "Lists" and the differences compared to "Disambiguation" pages? I am trying to understand what is going on at: List of Carpenter named articles. For example: Why is duplication prohibited or frowned on here? Why are partial listings or linking to "Carpenter" in an article is bad for a "List of" page is bad? Any help is appreciated. Jrcrin001 (talk) 22:25, 2 May 2010 (UTC) WikiloveThis template must be substituted, see Template:Smile for instructions It's been a while since I've spoken to you. Hope you're doing well, TT! Regards, AGK 21:21, 13 May 2010 (UTC) InterfaceClick the star, next to "View history". Help:Watchlist ;) -- Quiddity (talk) 17:32, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
User page helpHi there, I noticed you've done some work on building this area Here, I'm trying to build my user page and programming is not one of my strong points. My question is, if I were to use for example this navplate Here, how do I assign the links to the appropriate icon. Do I need to build my own plate ? How is this done ? Thanx for your time and hoping for some help Mlpearc pull my chain Trib's 17:51, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank you, what a wonderful surprise. It's like xmas ! Again thank you very much. And of course if I can ever do anything you have my number Mlpearc pull my chain Trib's 23:37, 23 May 2010 (UTC) BlockedThank you for the note on my talkpage. I will look into Verbal's conduct. Given my warning to you, which you reproduced on my talkpage, I can hardly avoid taking action in response to your page moves, which were an escalation of the dispute when you could have chosen to object those moves and seek to have them reverted, rather than do so yourself. I do not think that a blanket reversal of Verbal's moves shows that you "wish the move war to end" - quite the contrary. Accordingly, I have blocked you from editing Wikipedia for 48 hours. Once that block has expired, I encourage you to participate in discussion relating to the "Outlines of.." issue, but strongly suggest that you avoid future page moves (however provoked you may feel). WJBscribe (talk) 22:45, 28 May 2010 (UTC) Outline of RightsWhen you first reverted my redirect of Outline of rights to Rights, I posted a question for you on the talk page there. You never responded, but someone else undid your reversion soon after so I didn't much care; but if you insist on pressing this point I'd appreciate it if you would at least reply on the talk page there. As it stands, that article is little more than a duplicate of an old version of Rights, so if they are both to coexist, we need to determine what the difference between them is so they can each be tailored appropriately and not just have one be a shoddy copy of the other. --Pfhorrest (talk) 23:07, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Please revert your addition (again!) of "of chocolate" and "Chocolate" all over the article. It is redundant and looks silly. It also goes against the community approved Manual of Style. Please undo, as it takes time to manually go through and fix all of those. Please don't point me to any OOK text you've written, as they don't supersede our MOS. It's hard to assume good faith when you keep doing this, but I shall and that is why I'm asking for you to undo. If you want to rearrange sections could you please discuss that on the talk page too. The page, and outlines, are not any one persons.Verbal chat 19:14, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, if I'm butting in, but I watch this page, so I can't help but follow the discussion. Plus, I've made a few edits to the page recently. While I support outlines (clearly unlike Verbal), I'm surprised by how reasonable he has been (more than I remember or expected). But on the MOS Headings, I agree with Verbal. - Highfields (talk, contribs) 20:50, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Reviewer grantedHello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC). Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here. If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. –xenotalk 19:31, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Consensus for outlinesVerbal keeps asking you to show consensus. What about Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 28#Major rename proposal of certain "lists" to "outlines"? Doesn't look like you got much opposition there. -- Ϫ 18:21, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Dear TT: Uhm okay, so.. what about that link I mentioned? Not sure why you addressed that big long paragraph to me.. maybe you misinterpreted my intention, I was actually trying to help you.. everyone is asking for you to show consensus right? well there's a link from a community-wide forum, the Village Pump no less, which shows you officially requesting permission for the mass moves, and receiving little to no opposition from the community. Since silence implies consent, it would appear you DID actually have consensus to do the moves. So I'm not sure why you're not using that link to your advantage here. -- Ϫ 23:48, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Glaciers of Saint Helena listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Glaciers of Saint Helena. Since you had some involvement with the Glaciers of Saint Helena redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer (talk) 20:10, 23 June 2010 (UTC) Lord Chaitanya knows everything that happens in all three phases (past, present, and future, of time. He knows that in the future some demoni people will serve Lord Advaita. Text 123 They will refer to Lord Advaita by the name "Shri Krishna". In this way they will reject the words of the true Vaishnavas. Text 124 These sinners will thus disobey the devotees who affirm that Advaita is "the greatest Vaishnava". Text 125 Many persons will consider themselves the followers of Lord Advaita, but they will not have the power to see how in the future they will be punished. Text 126 Lord Chaitanya, the crest jewel of they who know everything, knew all this. Therefore He did something to try to stop this from happening. Text 127 By punishing His mother, Lord Chaitanya showed the result that comes from offending Lord Advaita or any other Vaishnava. Text 128 No one can protect a person who has offended a Vaishnava. Text 129 Therefore one should avoid persons who offend Vaishnava. Text 130 One should avoid an offender, even if the offender is otherwise very qualified. A little association with an offender will make one fall down. Text 131 Who has the power to understand why the Lord gives punishment? By punishing His mother, He taught everyone. Text 132 Anyone who blasphemes they who use the word `Vaishnava" to address Lord Advaita will be punished. He will perish. Text 133 Lord Chaitanya is theSupreme Personality of Godhead, the master of all. To be called His follower is very great praise. Text 134 Without any intention to deceive, Lord Chaitanya openly said that Lord Nityananda is the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself. Text 135 By Lord Nityananda's mercy I know Lord Chaitanya. By Lord Nityananda's mercy I know the Vaishnavas. Text 136 By Lord Nityananda's mercy offenses are destroyed. By Lord Nityananda's mercy one attains devotion to Lord Vishnu. Text 137 Blasphemy directed to Lord Nityananda's servants never enters my mouth. Day and night I happily sing Lord Chaitanya's glories Text 138 I carefully serve Lord Nityananda's devotees. Lord Chaitanya is the life and wealth of Lord Nityananda's servants. Text 139 A person who has only a little good fortune will not become Lord Nityananda's servant, for Lord Nityananda's servant is able to see Lord Chaitanya. Text 140 Anyone who hears this story of Lord Visvarupa becomes a servant of the limitless Supreme Personality of Godhead. He feels that Lord Nityananda is his very life. Text 141 Lord Nityananda and Lord Visvarupa do not have different bodies. This Mother Saci knew. Some other great souls also knew. Text 142 Glory to Lord Nityananda, who takes shelter of Lord Chaitanya! Glory, glory to Lord Nityananda, who is thousand-faced Ananta Sesha! Text 143 O Lord Nityananda, O king of Gauda-desa, glory to You! Who can attain Lord Chaitanya without first attaining Your mercy? Text 144 Anyone who loses Lord Nityananda will not be happy in this life. Text 145 Will I some day see Lord Chaitanya, Lord Nityananda, and their associates all thogether in one place? Text 146 Lord Chaitanya is my master. With great faith and hope I meditate on Him within my heart. Text 147 I bow down before Lord Advaita's feet. I pray that he will always be dear to me and that He will always stay in my thoughts. Text 148 The two moons Shri Krishna Chaitanya and Shri Nityananda are my life and soul. I, Vrindavana dasa, sing the glories of Their feet. |