Jump to content

User talk:Bjmullan: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
WT:BISE: thanks
How about this..: new section
Line 75: Line 75:


:After LM comment I was about to change it but you got to it first. I did not intend my comment to be an attack on TR and will ensure that in the future I am more careful. Thanks. [[User:Bjmullan|Bjmullan]] ([[User talk:Bjmullan#top|talk]]) 14:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
:After LM comment I was about to change it but you got to it first. I did not intend my comment to be an attack on TR and will ensure that in the future I am more careful. Thanks. [[User:Bjmullan|Bjmullan]] ([[User talk:Bjmullan#top|talk]]) 14:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

== How about this.. ==

I'll attack you as well...
Fuck off you cunt. Be careful who you mess with. It has been a [[User_talk:MickMacNee/Archive/2009#Policies_to_read.|long time]] since I was last banned. I am too [[Untouchables (law enforcement)|valuable]] to the project now so back off or else... [[User:MickMacNee|MickMacNee]] ([[User talk:MickMacNee#top|talk]]) 17:09, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:09, 16 August 2010

Template:Archive box collapsible Welcome to my talk page, please be civil and comment on my edits and not me. I will answer comments here.

CIL

Hope u don't mind - he won't stop until he sees roi. Anyway funding is liable to change. - ClemMcGann (talk) 21:29, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But it hasn't changed yet! And does CIL own the ports - no! They are Republic of Ireland ports, to differentiate them from those of Northern Ireland. Clem, you seem like another POV warrior intent on not having Republic of Ireland here. I'm reverting your latest change, so please come up with some arguments in favour of your version. Hrotovice (talk) 21:36, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
with respect, CIL provides the lights - not the RoI. CIL is an all-island body. Even at the height of the troubles, CIL went unmolested. You deleted my cite supporting "an annual contribution from the Irish Government towards the cost of the service provided by the Commissioners in the Republic of Ireland." - you removed my cite for RoI! - and claim that I am "another POV warrior intent on not having Republic of Ireland here" Please desist. - ClemMcGann (talk) 22:13, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As I've point out in Hrotovice talk page the ports covered by CIL are for the whole or Ireland and therefore using ROI is inappropriate. I have also warn him about his reverting. Bjmullan (talk) 20:49, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
wait - another awkward insertion of RoI ClemMcGann (talk) 20:43, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
a further consideration is that, with modern technology, large ships no longer depend on lighthouses. So the sentence is wrong, anyway. There were proposals that lesiure craft should have to pay. Now that labour are out, it remains to be seen what happens to that pproposal. Strictly speaking, the reason why CIL gets cash from Trinity House is that it was a provision of the Anglo-Irish treaty - ClemMcGann (talk) 23:55, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Silverstone Circuit

I have no doubt you're right about the length of the Stowe circuit, I just copied from the list on the right. I'm now reluctant to change the list on the right as someone is wrong and I don't want to make matters worse! If you're confident about the circuit length, I point you to the list on the right of the page... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.37.152.42 (talk) 13:23, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WPF1 Newsletter (June)

Cs-wolves(talk) 18:27, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Avalon

Response at my talk page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SpongerJack (talkcontribs) 22:31, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation: Israel and the Apartheid analogy

Just an FYI, we are running a straw poll on title choices on the mediation page - see Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2010-04-14/Israel_and_the_apartheid_analogy#Straw_poll_on_titles. If you pitch in a vote or three, we can move this along. --Ludwigs2 06:05, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder: you have not yet voted on the straw poll. If you don't, your voice will not be heard on this issue, which would be sad. . --Ludwigs2 06:25, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Londonderry/Derry

OK, so the MOS says use Derry for the city and Londonderry for the county, but it doesn't say that either term has to be replaced with the agreed version throughout the encyclopedia. You seem to be engaging in - shall we say - a systematic replacement of Londonderry with Derry. In the light of what's happened with British Isles I would suggest this is perhaps not a good idea. The replacements add nothing and can't even be argued as being right or wrong. LevenBoy (talk) 19:38, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whilst i disagree with the compromise on the Londonderry/Derry issue, as it is in the MOS i see no problem with those being changed to ensure the text use is inline with the MOS to avoid different usage which would cause more confusion. It would be a far more justified mission than the crusade to remove British Isles from wikipedia. BritishWatcher (talk) 21:21, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

You have been reported to AN/I for disruptive behavior regarding replacing Londonderry with Derry at McKownville, New York, and it seems at least one other editor warned you that this is behavior that may not be acceptable.Camelbinky (talk) 00:00, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: Wikipedia:Ani. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Toddst1 (talk) 15:33, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WPF1 Newsletter (July)

Cs-wolves(talk) 22:42, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Dunlop

Hi, looks good. Maybe you should consider including the race times as well(?). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nigel jewell (talkcontribs) 20:51, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the discussion. It was agreed.

Look at the discussion. It was agreed. --Triton Rocker (talk) 07:55, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just added 16 good references to one topic. What did you do?

I just added 16 good references to one topic alone and a load of tidy up. What did you do? --Triton Rocker (talk) 08:17, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll tell you what I didn't do....move one more step closer to a bigger ban for violating the British Isles topic ban. BTW redirecting your talk page to your homepage is just childish. Bjmullan (talk) 08:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Accidental blanking

This edit blanked a lot of the noticeboard... I just reverted. Do you want to do the repairs to restore the newer content? BECritical__Talk 19:46, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that Critical. That is the second time the something funny has happened while editing from an iPhone. Note too self stop editing from the iPhone! Bjmullan (talk) 20:38, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on closure of Israel and Aparthied mediation

Current consensus seems to be to move the article to Israel and Apartheid with an appropriate disambiguation line to prevent any misinterpretations. Please weigh in over the next few days. --Ludwigs2 17:10, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

Thank you. If I need any more advice from you, I will come and ask.

I do not wish to burden you any more. I will thank you for leaving my talk page alone now. --Triton Rocker (talk) 15:23, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not worries, advice costs nothing. Have a good weekend and chill ;-) Bjmullan (talk) 15:35, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed a comment you posted. TFOWR 14:12, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After LM comment I was about to change it but you got to it first. I did not intend my comment to be an attack on TR and will ensure that in the future I am more careful. Thanks. Bjmullan (talk) 14:15, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How about this..

I'll attack you as well... Fuck off you cunt. Be careful who you mess with. It has been a long time since I was last banned. I am too valuable to the project now so back off or else... MickMacNee (talk) 17:09, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]