Jump to content

Roger Penrose: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
++Nobel Chem
bah, wrong person. rollback.
Line 20: Line 20:
|influences = [[Dennis William Sciama|Dennis W. Sciama]]
|influences = [[Dennis William Sciama|Dennis W. Sciama]]
|influenced = [[Michael Atiyah]]</br>[[Stuart Hameroff]]
|influenced = [[Michael Atiyah]]</br>[[Stuart Hameroff]]
|awards = [[Wolf Prize]] (1988)</br>[[Dirac Prize|Dirac Medal]] (1989)</br>[[Copley Medal]] (2008)<br />[[Nobel Prize in Chemistry]] (2011)
|awards = [[Wolf Prize]] (1988)</br>[[Dirac Prize|Dirac Medal]] (1989)</br>[[Copley Medal]] (2008)
|religion = [[Materialist]]<ref>[http://www.leaderu.com/ftissues/ft9511/articles/revessay.html The Atheism of the Gaps<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> [[Platonist]]<ref>[http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/vic_stenger/polkrev.html Belief in God in an Age of Science by John Polkinghorne<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> with no doctrinal stance<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/oct/29/books.religion | work=The Guardian | location=London | title=Atheists top book charts by deconstructing God | first=Jamie | last=Doward | date=29 October 2006 | accessdate=22 May 2010}}</ref>
|religion = [[Materialist]]<ref>[http://www.leaderu.com/ftissues/ft9511/articles/revessay.html The Atheism of the Gaps<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> [[Platonist]]<ref>[http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/vic_stenger/polkrev.html Belief in God in an Age of Science by John Polkinghorne<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> with no doctrinal stance<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/oct/29/books.religion | work=The Guardian | location=London | title=Atheists top book charts by deconstructing God | first=Jamie | last=Doward | date=29 October 2006 | accessdate=22 May 2010}}</ref>
|signature =
|signature =

Revision as of 20:04, 5 October 2011

Roger Penrose
File:Roger Penrose.jpg
Roger Penrose
Born (1931-08-08) 8 August 1931 (age 93)
Colchester, Essex, England
NationalityBritish
Alma materUniversity of Cambridge
University College London
University College School
Known forTwistor theory
Geometry of spacetime

Cosmic censorship
Weyl curvature hypothesis
Penrose inequalities
Penrose interpretation of Quantum Theory
Orch-OR

Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse
Newman-Penrose formalism
Penrose tiling
Penrose stairs
Penrose graphical notation
AwardsWolf Prize (1988)
Dirac Medal (1989)
Copley Medal (2008)
Scientific career
FieldsMathematical physics
Mathematical sciences
InstitutionsBedford College, London
St John's College, Cambridge
Princeton University
Syracuse University
King’s College, London
Birkbeck, University of London
University of Oxford
Doctoral advisorJohn A. Todd
Other academic advisorsWilliam Hodge
Doctoral studentsTristan Needham
Richard Jozsa
Richard S. Ward
Andrew Hodges
Asghar Qadir
George Burnett-Stuart
Matthew Ginsberg
Adam Helfer
Lane P. Hughston
Peter Law
Claude LeBrun
Ross Moore
Duncan Stone
Tim Poston
George Sparling
K. Paul Tod
Notes
He is the brother of Jonathan Penrose and Oliver Penrose, and son of Lionel Penrose. He is the nephew of Roland Penrose.

Sir Roger Penrose OM FRS (born 8 August 1931) is an English mathematical physicist and Emeritus Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics at the Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford and Emeritus Fellow of Wadham College. He has received a number of prizes and awards, including the 1988 Wolf Prize for physics which he shared with Stephen Hawking for their contribution to our understanding of the universe.[4] He is renowned for his work in mathematical physics, in particular his contributions to general relativity and cosmology. He is also a recreational mathematician and philosopher.

Career

He was born in Colchester, Essex, England, Roger Penrose is a son of Lionel S. Penrose and Margaret Leathes.[5] Penrose is the brother of mathematician Oliver Penrose and of chess Grandmaster Jonathan Penrose. Penrose attended University College School and University College, London, where he graduated with a first class degree in mathematics. In 1955, while still a student, Penrose reintroduced the E. H. Moore generalized matrix inverse (also known as Moore–Penrose inverse[6] after it had been reinvented by Arne Bjerhammar (1951). Penrose earned his Ph.D. at Cambridge (St John's College) in 1958, writing a thesis on "tensor methods in algebraic geometry" under algebraist and geometer John A. Todd. He devised and popularised the Penrose triangle in the 1950s, describing it as "impossibility in its purest form" and exchanged material with the artist M. C. Escher, whose earlier depictions of impossible objects partly inspired it. Escher's Waterfall, and Ascending and Descending were in turn inspired by Penrose. As reviewer Manjit Kumar puts it:

As a student in 1954, Penrose was attending a conference in Amsterdam when by chance he came across an exhibition of Escher's work. Soon he was trying to conjure up impossible figures of his own and discovered the tri-bar – a triangle that looks like a real, solid three-dimensional object, but isn't. Together with his father, a physicist and mathematician, Penrose went on to design a staircase that simultaneously loops up and down. An article followed and a copy was sent to Escher. Completing a cyclical flow of creativity, the Dutch master of geometrical illusions was inspired to produce his two masterpieces.[7]

In 1965, at Cambridge, Penrose proved that singularities (such as black holes) could be formed from the gravitational collapse of immense, dying stars.[8]

Oil painting by Urs Schmid (1995) of a Penrose tiling using fat and thin rhombi.

In 1967, Penrose invented the twistor theory which maps geometric objects in Minkowski space into the 4-dimensional complex space with the metric signature (2,2). In 1969, he conjectured the cosmic censorship hypothesis. This proposes (rather informally) that the universe protects us from the inherent unpredictability of singularities (such as the one in the centre of a black hole) by hiding them from our view behind an event horizon. This form is now known as the "weak censorship hypothesis"; in 1979, Penrose formulated a stronger version called the "strong censorship hypothesis". Together with the BKL conjecture and issues of nonlinear stability, settling the censorship conjectures is one of the most important outstanding problems in general relativity. Also from 1979 dates Penrose's influential Weyl curvature hypothesis on the initial conditions of the observable part of the Universe and the origin of the second law of thermodynamics.[9] Penrose and James Terrell independently realized that objects travelling near the speed of light will appear to undergo a peculiar skewing or rotation. This effect has come to be called the Terrell rotation or Penrose–Terrell rotation.[10][11]

Penrose is well known for his 1974 discovery of Penrose tilings, which are formed from two tiles that can only tile the plane nonperiodically, and are the first tilings to exhibit fivefold rotational symmetry. Penrose developed these ideas based on the article Deux types fondamentaux de distribution statistique[12] (1938; an English translation Two Basic Types of Statistical Distribution) by Czech geographer, demographer and statistician Jaromír Korčák. In 1984, such patterns were observed in the arrangement of atoms in quasicrystals.[13] Another noteworthy contribution is his 1971 invention of spin networks, which later came to form the geometry of spacetime in loop quantum gravity. He was influential in popularizing what are commonly known as Penrose diagrams (causal diagrams). In 2004 Penrose released The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe, a 1,099-page book aimed at giving a comprehensive guide to the laws of physics. He has proposed a novel interpretation of quantum mechanics.[14] In 2010, Penrose reported possible evidence, based on concentric circles found in WMAP data of the CMB sky, of an earlier universe existing before the Big Bang of our own present universe.[15]

Penrose is the Francis and Helen Pentz Distinguished (visiting) Professor of Physics and Mathematics at Pennsylvania State University.[16] Penrose is married to Vanessa Thomas, head of mathematics at Abingdon School[17][18], with whom he has one son[19]. He has three sons from a previous marriage to American Joan Isabel Wedge, whom he married in 1959.

Physics and consciousness

Despite Penrose's contributions, most of the thinkers who have appraised his work say that he has so far failed to support the claim that consciousness could not be explained by existing scientific principles.

Penrose has written controversial books on the connection between fundamental physics and human (or animal) consciousness. In The Emperor's New Mind (1989), he argues that known laws of physics are inadequate to explain the phenomenon of consciousness. Penrose proposes the characteristics this new physics may have and specifies the requirements for a bridge between classical and quantum mechanics (what he calls correct quantum gravity). He claims that the present computer is unable to have intelligence because it is an algorithmically deterministic system. He argues against the viewpoint that the rational processes of the mind are completely algorithmic and can thus be duplicated by a sufficiently complex computer. This contrasts with supporters of strong artificial intelligence, who contend that thought can be simulated algorithmically. He bases this on claims that consciousness transcends formal logic because things such as the insolubility of the halting problem and Gödel's incompleteness theorem prevent an algorithmically based system of logic from reproducing such traits of human intelligence as mathematical insight. These claims were originally espoused by the philosopher John Lucas of Merton College, Oxford. The Penrose/Lucas argument about the implications of Gödel's incompleteness theorem for computational theories of human intelligence has been widely criticized by mathematicians, computer scientists and philosophers, and the consensus among experts in these fields seems to be that the argument fails, though different authors may choose different aspects of the argument to attack.[20]

Penrose uses a variant of Turing's halting theorem to demonstrate that a system can be deterministic without being algorithmic. (E.g., imagine a system with only two states, ON and OFF. If the system's state is ON if a given Turing machine halts, and OFF if the Turing machine does not halt, then the system's state is completely determined by the Turing machine, however there is no algorithmic way to determine whether the Turing machine stops.) Penrose believes that such deterministic non-algorithmic processes may come in play in the quantum mechanical wave function reduction, and may be harnessed by the brain.

In 1994, Penrose followed up The Emperor's New Mind with Shadows of the Mind, and in 1997 with The Large, the Small and the Human Mind, further updating and expanding his theories. Marvin Minsky, a leading proponent of artificial intelligence, responded that Penrose "tries to show, in chapter after chapter, that human thought cannot be based on any known scientific principle." In contrast, Minsky argues that humans are, in fact, machines, whose functioning, although complex, is fully explainable by current physics. Minsky maintains that "one can carry that quest [for scientific explanation] too far by only seeking new basic principles instead of attacking the real detail. This is what I see in Penrose's quest for a new basic principle of physics that will account for consciousness."[21]

Penrose and Stuart Hameroff have speculated that consciousness is the result of quantum gravity effects in microtubules, which they dubbed Orch-OR (orchestrated objective reduction). But Max Tegmark, in a paper in Physical Review E,[22] calculated that the time scale of neuron firing and excitations in microtubules is slower than the decoherence time by a factor of at least 10,000,000,000. The reception of the paper is summed up by this statement in Tegmark's support: "Physicists outside the fray, such as IBM's John A. Smolin, say the calculations confirm what they had suspected all along. 'We're not working with a brain that's near absolute zero. It's reasonably unlikely that the brain evolved quantum behavior'".[23] Tegmark's paper has been widely cited by critics of the Penrose–Hameroff position. It has been claimed by Hameroff to be based on a number of incorrect assumptions (see linked paper below from Hameroff, Scott Hagan and Jack Tuszyński), but Tegmark in turn has argued that the critique is invalid (see rejoinder link below). In particular, Hameroff points out the peculiarity that Tegmark's formula for the decoherence time includes a factor of in the numerator, meaning that higher temperatures would lead to longer decoherence times. Tegmark's rejoinder keeps the factor of for the decoherence time.

Phillip Tetlow, although himself supportive of Penrose's views, acknowledges that Penrose's ideas about the human thought process are not widely accepted in scientific circles, citing Minsky's criticisms and quoting science journalist Charles Seife's description of Penrose as "one of a handful of scientists" who believe that the nature of consciousness suggests a quantum process.[23]

In spite of the many critics, new experimental results of imaging neuronal spikes [24] and spike directivity data [25] suggest a complex process of computation in neurons that may include electrical interactions on the quantum level [26] and reject naive spike timing models of neural coding.

Religious views

Penrose does not hold to any religious doctrine,[27] and refers to himself as an atheist.[28] In the film A Brief History of Time, he said, "I think I would say that the universe has a purpose, it's not somehow just there by chance ... some people, I think, take the view that the universe is just there and it runs along–it's a bit like it just sort of computes, and we happen somehow by accident to find ourselves in this thing. But I don't think that's a very fruitful or helpful way of looking at the universe, I think that there is something much deeper about it."[29] Penrose is a Distinguished Supporter of the British Humanist Association.

Awards and honours

Roger Penrose during a lecture

Penrose has been awarded many prizes for his contributions to science. He was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society of London in 1972. In 1975, Stephen Hawking and Penrose were jointly awarded the Eddington Medal of the Royal Astronomical Society. In 1985, he was awarded the Royal Society Royal Medal. Along with Stephen Hawking, he was awarded the prestigious Wolf Foundation Prize for Physics in 1988. In 1989 he was awarded the Dirac Medal and Prize of the British Institute of Physics. In 1990 Penrose was awarded the Albert Einstein Medal for outstanding work related to the work of Albert Einstein by the Albert Einstein Society. In 1991, he was awarded the Naylor Prize of the London Mathematical Society. From 1992 to 1995 he served as President of the International Society on General Relativity and Gravitation. In 1994, Penrose was knighted for services to science.[30] In 1998, he was elected Foreign Associate of the United States National Academy of Sciences. In 2000 he was appointed to the Order of Merit. In 2004 he was awarded the De Morgan Medal for his wide and original contributions to mathematical physics. To quote the citation from the London Mathematical Society:

His deep work on General Relativity has been a major factor in our understanding of black holes. His development of Twistor Theory has produced a beautiful and productive approach to the classical equations of mathematical physics. His tilings of the plane underlie the newly discovered quasi-crystals.

In 2005 Penrose was awarded an honorary doctorate (Honoris Causa) by Warsaw University and Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Belgium), and in 2006 by the University of York. In 2008 Penrose was awarded the Copley Medal. He is also a Distinguished Supporter of the British Humanist Association and one of the patrons of the Oxford University Scientific Society.

Works

Penrose also wrote forewords to Quantum Aspects of Life and Zee's book Fearful Symmetry.

See also

References

  1. ^ The Atheism of the Gaps
  2. ^ Belief in God in an Age of Science by John Polkinghorne
  3. ^ Doward, Jamie (29 October 2006). "Atheists top book charts by deconstructing God". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 22 May 2010.
  4. ^ Penrose, R (2005). The Road to Reality: A Complete guide to the Laws of the Universe. Vintage Books. ISBN 0-099-44068-7.
  5. ^ Penrose and his father shared mathematical concepts with Dutch graphic artist M. C. Escher which were incorporated into a lot of pieces, including Waterfall, which is based on the 'Penrose triangle', and Up and Down.
  6. ^ Penrose, R. "A Generalized Inverse for Matrices" Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 51, 406–413, 1955)
  7. ^ Cycles of Time: An Extraordinary New View of the Universe by Roger Penrose – review | Books | The Guardian
  8. ^ Ferguson, 1991: 66
  9. ^ R. Penrose (1979). "Singularities and Time-Asymmetry". In S. W. Hawking and W. Israel (ed.). General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey. Cambridge University Press. pp. 581–638. {{cite conference}}: Unknown parameter |booktitle= ignored (|book-title= suggested) (help)
  10. ^ Terrell, James (1959). "Invisibility of the Lorentz Contraction". Physical Review. 116 (4): 1041–1045. Bibcode:1959PhRv..116.1041T. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.116.1041. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |DUPLICATE DATA: journal= ignored (help).
  11. ^ Penrose, Roger (1959). "The Apparent Shape of a Relativistically Moving Sphere". Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 55: 137–139. doi:10.1017/S0305004100033776..
  12. ^ Jaromír Korčák (1938): Deux types fondamentaux de distribution statistique. Prague, Comité d’organisation, Bull. de l'Institute Int'l de Statistique, vol. 3, pp. 295–299.
  13. ^ Steinhardt, Paul (1996). "New perspectives on forbidden symmetries, quasicrystals, and Penrose tilings". PNAS. 93 (25): 14267–14270. Bibcode:1996PNAS...9314267S. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.25.14267. PMC 34472. PMID 8962037..
  14. ^ "If an Electron Can Be in Two Places at once, Why Can't You?". Retrieved 2008-10-27.
  15. ^ Gurzadyan, V.G.; Penrose, R. (2010). "Concentric circles in WMAP data may provide evidence of violent pre-Big-Bang activity". arXiv:1011.3706 [astro-ph.CO]. {{cite arXiv}}: Unknown parameter |volume= ignored (help)
  16. ^ "Dr. Roger Penrose at Penn State University". Retrieved 2007-07-09. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  17. ^ http://www.gruberprizes.org/SelectingRecipients/SelectionAdvisoryBoard_Bio.php?id=4
  18. ^ http://www.abingdon.org.uk/vanessa_penrose/
  19. ^ http://www.gruberprizes.org/SelectingRecipients/SelectionAdvisoryBoard_Bio.php?id=4
  20. ^ Criticism of the Lucas/Penrose argument that intelligence can not be entirely algorithmic: Sources that indicate Penrose's argument is generally rejected: Sources that also note that different sources attack different points of the argument:
    • Princeton Philosophy professor John Burgess writes in On the Outside Looking In: A Caution about Conservativeness (published in Kurt Gödel: Essays for his Centennial, with the following comments found on pp. 131–132) that "the consensus view of logicians today seems to be that the Lucas–Penrose argument is fallacious, though as I have said elsewhere, there is at least this much to be said for Lucas and Penrose, that logicians are not unanimously agreed as to where precisely the fallacy in their argument lies. There are at least three points at which the argument may be attacked."
    • Dershowitz, Nachum 2005. The Four Sons of Penrose, in Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Logic Programming for Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning (LPAR; Jamaica), G. Sutcliffe and A. Voronkov, eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3835, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 125–138.
  21. ^ Marvin Minsky. "Conscious Machines." Machinery of Consciousness, Proceedings, National Research Council of Canada, 75th Anniversary Symposium on Science in Society, June 1991.
  22. ^ Tegmark, Max. 2000. "The importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes". Physical Review E. vol 61. pp. 4194–4206.
  23. ^ a b Tetlow, Philip (2007). The Web's Awake: An Introduction to the Field of Web Science and the Concept of Web Life. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. p. 166. ISBN 978-0-470-13794-9.
  24. ^ Aur D., Jog, MS, Building Spike Representation in Tetrodes, Journal of Neuroscience Methods Volume 157, Issue 2 , 30 October 2006, Pages 364–373 , http://dx.doi.org./10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.05.003
  25. ^ Aur, D., Connolly, C.I., and Jog, M.S, (2005), Computing spike directivity with tetrodes, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Volume 149, Issue 1, 30, pp. 57–63, http://dx.doi.org./10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.05.006
  26. ^ Aur D., Jog, MS., 2010 Neuroelectrodynamics: Understanding the brain language, IOS Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-473-3-i
  27. ^ Harris, Sam. "Letter to A Christian Nation". SamHarrisOrg. Retrieved 5 June 2010. Quoting Penrose's blurb for Harris's book Letter to a Christian Nation.
  28. ^ "Big Bang follows Big Bang follows Big Bang". BBC News. 25 September 2010. Retrieved 1 Dec 2010..
  29. ^ See A Brief History of Time, quote starts at about 1:12:43 in the video.
  30. ^ Official announcement knighthood. The London Gazette. 11 June 1994.

Further reading

  • Ferguson, Kitty (1991). Stephen Hawking: Quest For A Theory of Everything. Franklin Watts. ISBN 0-553-29895-X.
  • Misner, Charles; Thorne, Kip S. & Wheeler, John Archibald (1973). Gravitation. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman. ISBN 0-7167-0344-0.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link); see Box 34.2.

The Forum

Template:Persondata