Jump to content

User talk:Kapitan110295: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 226: Line 226:
Hi, I saw you did the "seat changing hands" table for the NSW Election 2011. I would like to do the same for QLD as well. I was wondering if you did them all manually or is there a faster way haha. Thank you! [[User:Dengero|Dengero]] ([[User talk:Dengero|talk]]) 15:20, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you did the "seat changing hands" table for the NSW Election 2011. I would like to do the same for QLD as well. I was wondering if you did them all manually or is there a faster way haha. Thank you! [[User:Dengero|Dengero]] ([[User talk:Dengero|talk]]) 15:20, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
:Ok I'll leave it to the expert haha. Calculating the margin/swings is killing me *facepalm*. Thank you![[User:Dengero|Dengero]] ([[User talk:Dengero|talk]]) 00:23, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
:Ok I'll leave it to the expert haha. Calculating the margin/swings is killing me *facepalm*. Thank you![[User:Dengero|Dengero]] ([[User talk:Dengero|talk]]) 00:23, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

== A barnstar for you ==
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" |{{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|[[File:Modest Barnstar Hires.png|100px]]|[[File:Modest Barnstar.png|100px]]}}
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Modest Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this month! [[Special:Contributions/66.87.0.115|66.87.0.115]] ([[User talk:66.87.0.115|talk]]) 20:29, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
|}

Revision as of 20:29, 31 March 2012

Hi

Hi - thanks for all the work you're doing with changing seats - it's great to see! Thanks also for picking up my oversight on the 2010 candidates page. Frickeg (talk) 08:35, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox used for election pages

Hi - there's a discussion here as to which election infobox should be used. The one you added, the global infobox, is being unilaterally removed by Orderinchaos. I thought as the person who added it, you'd like to know so your view can be registered. Timeshift (talk) 04:55, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Skype

You might note that at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Queensland state election, 1920, also introduced some extraneous text around some numerical characters. This may be due to a combination of your browser and Skype trying to identify and highlight telephone numbers. Thank you.--Rumping (talk) 00:55, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Minority/majority government

Why are you making such a massive change without consensus? You're arbitrarily and manually adding in to a very prominent area up the top of the infobox and hence each article. Most governments are majority governments in the traditional Australian westminster system. Ones that aren't are noted in the article as such. But such prominence for something that can be trivial in most elections is not a good idea. Timeshift (talk) 01:29, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox doesn't need to state it though. The infobox is for mathematical election statistics - not concepts such as majority and minority government. That is for the lead of the article. Nobody can get confused over who won the right to govern, pre and post pm/premier is at the bottom of the infobox. Timeshift (talk) 02:07, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since when

Are ISBNS removed in refs? (Tas 1909)- are you up with WP:MOS - if so - show me where citations have ISBNS removed SatuSuro 08:31, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

sorry I have no idea about skype or the bug - but when i see ISBN's being removed during an edit - I do get concerned about that SatuSuro 12:14, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


A tag has been placed on Template:Australian politics/name/Nationals WA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:22, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It seems a bit odd to me that the liberal leader is assigned blue and the conservative leader is assigned yellow... can you advise why you chose these colours and if you'd object to them being swapped around? Timeshift (talk) 08:00, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The answer is common sense really... liberal and conservative ministerialists, and liberal and conservative oppositionists. Timeshift (talk) 08:19, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really have the time or motivation at the moment... can you find the time to fix it? Timeshift (talk) 08:23, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that. Timeshift (talk) 11:06, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Placement of w/o

I see you are moving "w/o" from winner to loser in tennis draws. Is that based on a guideline or what? It seems more natural to me to write it at the winner. PrimeHunter (talk) 04:08, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think w/o at winner is at least a Wikipedia convention although it may be an unwritten convention. If you want to change it then I suggest posting to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis/Article Guidelines (I don't know how many are watching the latter). It's best if there is a consistent system in draw articles so I don't think you should make changes without discussion. I'm not sure what comparable sources do. Many sources only write the winners name in a draw after round 1 and then w/o has to be near the winner. A source like http://2010.usopen.org/en_US/scores/cmatch/12ws.html skirts the issue by writing Walkover between the names but we don't have that option with our table formatting.
The "v d e" links in {{Top Australian female doubles tennis players}} earlier lead to a redirect because the name parameter was not the actual template name. I have fixed this: [1][2]. Before the fix you could have clicked the "Edit" tab on a page where the template is used, and then clicked the template name on the list of transcluded templates at the bottom of the window. PrimeHunter (talk) 13:16, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Number 1 Ranking

Please add references to the dates from the related ATP site. For example this for Roger Federer at July 6, 2009. Lajbi Holla @ meCP 09:58, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Kapitan110295 and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! roh. (talk) 09:17, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

The article 1999 Toray Pan Pacific Open – Singles Qualifying has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I could not find significant coverage of the subject in reliable source. Delete per WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Odie5533 (talk) 23:50, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1999 Toray Pan Pacific Open – Doubles Qualifying has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I could not find significant coverage of the subject in reliable source. Delete per WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Odie5533 (talk) 23:50, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some tips to help you out!

Hi Kapitan110295, I thought I'd drop a few notes on your talk page with some help on writing articles :o)

First of all, it may be best for you to do a bit of reading, starting with the Wikipedia manual of style, which will give you a lot of information about how Wikipedia prefers its articles to be written. It's not as hard to follow as it might look; quite a bit of the information there probably won't be vital for you at first.

Second, I recommend you make a user sandbox - which is just an area you can use to practise in, and to make notes in, and to get things ready in. If you click this red link: user:Kapitan110295/Sandbox, that will let you create that page (it gives you an edit window to start work in). Anything, anywhere, on the help and information pages which gives you an example, try it out in your sandbox until you're familiar with it.

For your article, the next thing you want to do is start collecting as much information as you can about it. Google searches (particularly in Books and Scholar) will be your best friend for this! Once you've found the information, the next most important thing is to start writing up each fact in your own words (very important, this), and make a note at the same time of exactly where that information came from. Build in the references as you go along; I'm going to copy in, down below this, a whole heap of help on doing references, which was produced by one of our best teachers (Chzz).

Here's another place that you'll find incredibly useful - citation templates which you can copy and paste into your sandbox, between <ref></ref> tags; you just fill in the blanks from your sources into the template, and you'll end up with nicely formatted inline citations :o) It all helps. Remember to add a references section to your sandbox (make a new line, and put ==References== on it, and type {{reflist}} on the next line, so that you can see how your citations look as you do them. Remember to save your page often! You don't want to lose your work.

Hopefully this will give you a good start and make life easier for you.

One last thing to keep as a motto: "It's better to write one good, well-referenced, nicely-presented article than it is to create fifty unreferenced one-line stubs!" Pesky (talkstalk!) 08:04, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How references work

Simple references

These require two parts;

a)
Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea. <ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref>
b) A section called "References" with the special code "{{reflist}}";
== References ==
{{reflist}}

(an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections)

To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:Kapitan110295/reftest and try it out.

Named references

Chzz was born in 1837. <ref name=MyBook>
"The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. 
</ref> 

Chzz lives in Footown.<ref name=MyBook/>

Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.

Citation templates

You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;

Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. <ref> {{Citation
 | last = Smith
 | first = John
 | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century
 | publication-date = 2001
 | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]]
 | page = 125
 | isbn = 0-521-37169-4
}}
</ref>

Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.

For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.

Something to make your life easier!

Hi there Kapitan110295! I've just come across one of your articles, and noticed that you had to create titles for your url links manually, or were using bare urls as references.

You might want to consider using this tool - it makes your life a whole heap easier, by filling in complete citation templates for your links. All you do is install the script on Special:MyPage/common.js, or or Special:MyPage/vector.js, then paste the bare url (without [...] brackets) between your <ref></ref> tabs, and you'll find a clickable link called Reflinks in your toolbox section of the page (probably in the left hand column). Then click that tool. It does all the rest of the work (provided that you remember to save the page! It doesn't work for everything (particularly often not for pdf documents), but for pretty much anything ending in "htm" or "html" (and with a title) it will do really, really well. Happy editing! Pesky (talkstalk!) 08:04, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 1999 Swisscom Challenge – Doubles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. That's me! Have doubt? What I done? 06:36, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bulwersator (talk) 05:07, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:16TeamBracket-Compact-Tennis5333-Byes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 08:37, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2RoundBracket-Byes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Armbrust Talk to me about my editsreview 06:05, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited 1998 US Open – Women's Doubles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grand Slam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating qualify round pages

Qualifying tennis rounds belong on the appropriate singles/doubles pages...not in a separate article. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:05, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note, and thanks for creating those qualifiers to begin with. Very tedious job that I don't like to do. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:41, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1999 ANZ Tasmanian International – Singles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Barbara Schwartz
1999 ASB Classic – Doubles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Barbara Schwartz
1999 ASB Classic – Singles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Barbara Schwartz
1999 Estoril Open – Women's Doubles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Barbara Schwartz
1999 Lipton Championships – Women's Singles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Barbara Schwartz
1999 Nokia Cup – Singles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Barbara Schwartz
1999 Open Gaz de France – Singles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Barbara Schwartz

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lazy?

I am not lazy, I just don't nor will ever do diacritics because of my severe disagreement with them used here on the English language Wikipedia.HotHat (talk) 10:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Fed Cup Europe/Africa Zone Group I – Pool B, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Johanna Larsson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1996 Fed Cup

Please do go ahead. When I made those links I (without reliable sources as back-up) thought that they were known as World Group I and a World Group II, but they are really known as World Group and World Group II. Totalinarian (talk) 15:42, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seat Changing Hands

Hi, I saw you did the "seat changing hands" table for the NSW Election 2011. I would like to do the same for QLD as well. I was wondering if you did them all manually or is there a faster way haha. Thank you! Dengero (talk) 15:20, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'll leave it to the expert haha. Calculating the margin/swings is killing me *facepalm*. Thank you!Dengero (talk) 00:23, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

The Modest Barnstar
You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this month! 66.87.0.115 (talk) 20:29, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]