Jump to content

User talk:Ironholds: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 143: Line 143:
::Deleting a sourced article is in readers' interest, isn't it? [[Special:Contributions/79.117.210.62|79.117.210.62]] ([[User talk:79.117.210.62|talk]]) 17:00, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
::Deleting a sourced article is in readers' interest, isn't it? [[Special:Contributions/79.117.210.62|79.117.210.62]] ([[User talk:79.117.210.62|talk]]) 17:00, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
:::Providing an active disincentive for users prohibited from using our site from doing so is certainly in the projects' interest. [[User:Ironholds|Ironholds]] ([[User talk:Ironholds#top|talk]]) 17:02, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
:::Providing an active disincentive for users prohibited from using our site from doing so is certainly in the projects' interest. [[User:Ironholds|Ironholds]] ([[User talk:Ironholds#top|talk]]) 17:02, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
::::So priority no.1 is to discourage banned users, even if the collateral effect is that readers are deprived of an useful article. The precedence is: 1. Annihilate banned users and 2. Take care of readers' interest. Very interesting I can say [[Special:Contributions/79.117.210.62|79.117.210.62]] ([[User talk:79.117.210.62|talk]]) 17:08, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:08, 3 June 2012

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
RfA candidate S O N S % Status Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Asilvering 120 1 0 99 Open 09:15, 6 September 2024 4 days, 2 hours no report

Help with A2E page deletions

Hello Ironholds, it's been a while...

Please look at the deletions by Mean as custard at [1] and let me know how I could improve the article.

I have some specific Questions about A2E deletions as well

  • How a listing of certificates a company has (and Mean as custard just deleted off from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America_II_Electronics) constitutes advertising? Is it not allowed on wikipedia to list a companies legit certifications?
  • Also, other pages like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heilind_Electronics list articles, so I thought that it is okay to list articles when properly pointing them to the source, can I have those back? or can you tell me what is wrong with them, so I can fix.
  • I listed citation to the "one of the largest independent companies" statement, is Electronic Sourcing not considered a legit reliable source?
  • Also same page lists linkedin, facebook and similar links. so why were deleted from my page, is there a rule about this?

Please let me know, so i can improve the article properly. Thanks, Thadson (talk) 11:54, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ping

I've emailed you about a Signpost story. Tony (talk) 12:36, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Indelible Barnstar

The Indelible Barnstar
Inked. Forever and unique. Jorm (WMF) (talk) 06:39, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Irish Breakfast!

Leonard is enjoying the Irish Breakfast and calls it "extremely delicious" -- thanks for the kind gift. Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation Engineering Community Manager 15:25, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nirmal Baba

Hey :) I am SO glad someone appreciates it. I really feel for the article and had so much fun fighting vandalism and getting it protected and adding news as it got updated. thanks! Noopur28 (talk) 17:35, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Ironholds. You have new messages at Jamietw's talk page.
Message added 06:28, 29 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Jamietw (talk) 06:28, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request: User:NYCSlover

A user you blocked in March 2011, User:NYCSlover, has asked to be unblocked. As I am unfamiliar with the issues around him/her, you may wish to comment on their page. --RA (talk) 21:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the compliment.

Thank you for the compliment :) YoterMimeni (talk) 10:58, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Contostavlos v Mendahun

If you have time could you (as one of the few Wikipedia editors with a little knowledge of law) contribute to this AfD. Francium12 (talk) 19:26, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! :). Ironholds (talk) 22:22, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! :). Ironholds (talk) 22:28, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese politicians

You know... in fact, I created them just to exist hoping that someone else would add contect. I did it basically to remind other wikipedians of the existance of the guys.--The Theosophist (talk) 12:40, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In the Chinese wikipedia, they have articles with sources. Unfortunately, I don't know chinese...--The Theosophist (talk) 12:46, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you didn't notice, the only thing I wrote was "X (X-X) was a Chinese politician". I don't think that someone needs to speak the language.--The Theosophist (talk) 12:55, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I did not translate anything. I knew that they were chinese politicians. The only thing I took from the Chinese Wikipedia was the dates.--The Theosophist (talk) 13:02, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I found sources at the Chinese wikipedia about the dates of only two of them. Now what?--The Theosophist (talk) 13:19, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No, all have references about this and that, but only two about the date of birth and death. Would you like me to give you links?--The Theosophist (talk) 13:28, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

I had my (first) successful ANI, which leaded to a Check User request. See this. Thanks! --Tomtomn00 (talkcontributions) 18:03, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! :). Ironholds (talk) 00:41, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, at least I know that I'm getting a bit better. :) --Tomtomn00 (talkcontributions) 06:37, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A voyage of gastronomic discovery

Enjoy a Virtual Meal on the Pesky Express. (Guaranteed calorie-free!)
personalized WikiLove by Penyulap

Just because ;P Pesky (talk) 19:28, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha. Nice! :). Ironholds (talk) 00:41, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

EE politics again, this time to set things right....

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. [2] -- CoolKoon (talk) 22:07, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted template

Do you have access to deleted templates? I would like to obtain content present in the Template:Pakistan ties, deleted sometime in 2010, and merge some of the links it had into Template:Foreign relations of Pakistan as I can't remember all the articles it had listed. Could you help? Mar4d (talk) 00:45, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

E-Mail

Hello, Ironholds. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--Thine Antique Pen (talkcontributions) 15:21, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Leighton relationship

Many thanks to you as well. It's great to receive positive feedback after writing a new article... --Mark91it's my world 23:17, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ironholds. I would appreciate it if you could help me out by moving these deleted articles to my userspace so I can work on them. Thank you kindly. Candleabracadabra (talk) 00:06, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey; you may have better luck with Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion :). I've gotta run to work and won't be available on this until tomorrow, optimistically. Sorry! Ironholds (talk) 11:16, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

fyi ;) Br'er Rabbit (talk) 06:29, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Ironholds. You have new messages at TheGeneralUser's talk page.
Message added 20:29, 2 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

TheGeneralUser (talk) 20:29, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Ironholds. You have new messages at TheGeneralUser's talk page.
Message added 20:51, 2 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

TheGeneralUser (talk) 20:51, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Ridgewell

Hello, Ironholds. You have new messages at GrahamSmith's talk page.
Message added 00:42, 3 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

OBLS

May I ask why my page was deleted but the Oxford Law Society page remains? ldesouza19 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ldesouza19 (talkcontribs) 00:47, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) And is there anyway I can create a page for the society that is in line with the regulations? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ldesouza19 (talkcontribs) 00:52, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, what you need to do is show that the society has been covered by third-party sources; newspapers, journal articles, books, that sort of thing. I appreciate it's a pretty high burden to set for a student society :(. Ironholds (talk) 01:04, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your assistance please...

You concluded a speedy deletion of the article Akhbarona under WP:CSD#A7.

Could you userify this article for me? i'll put a {{db-u1}} if I agree it is not notable. if i disagree, are you interested in discussing my choices with me? Geo Swan (talk) 02:32, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure; happy to userfy it. If you disagree we can discuss it, sure, but there's no claim to notability I can see. Ironholds (talk) 02:33, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Now at User:Geo Swan/Akhbarona :). Ironholds (talk) 02:34, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Szilágyi

Why did you delete the article of Michael Szilágyi? I don't understand. Szilágyi was an important Hungarian historical figure and served as Regent of the Kingdom of Hungary in 1958. The article had useful and relevant sources. Your step is equal to vandalism... --Norden1990 (talk) 16:08, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The page was created by a banned user violating his sanctions; such articles have to be deleted. There's nothing stopping anyone recreating the article, as long as they aren't that user. Ironholds (talk) 16:42, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Deleting a sourced article is in readers' interest, isn't it? 79.117.210.62 (talk) 17:00, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Providing an active disincentive for users prohibited from using our site from doing so is certainly in the projects' interest. Ironholds (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
So priority no.1 is to discourage banned users, even if the collateral effect is that readers are deprived of an useful article. The precedence is: 1. Annihilate banned users and 2. Take care of readers' interest. Very interesting I can say 79.117.210.62 (talk) 17:08, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]