Jump to content

User talk:Lesion: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
rm autoblock - i can edit now
Line 286: Line 286:
{{GL Photography reply}}
{{GL Photography reply}}
--[[User:Kevjonesin|Kevjonesin]] ([[User talk:Kevjonesin|talk]]) 21:18, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
--[[User:Kevjonesin|Kevjonesin]] ([[User talk:Kevjonesin|talk]]) 21:18, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

== Deleting Primary Sources ==

I hav nothing to do per your orders. I did not delete any material that wuz actually being used. I deleted material from somebody's search and select of pubmed for [[MMSC]]. Az for the "yoh mommuh joke", it's a matter of taste, because you should understand that it iz impossible to be that stinky. [[Special:Contributions/75.152.123.238|75.152.123.238]] ([[User talk:75.152.123.238|talk]]) 19:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:10, 23 May 2013

Message for Hairy Wombat...

Please see Talk:Hematoma#Hematoma and bruise, thanks and sorry to bother you. lesion (talk) 19:08, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No bother; thanks for the heads up. I have responded over at Talk:Hematoma#Hematoma and bruise. (Note that with {{Talkback|Talk:<Page name>|[Section title]|ts=~~~~~}}, you could have omitted a step.) HairyWombat 20:16, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

I left some comments for you at the GA review. Contact me at my talk page again please when you think you've addressed them and I'll generate more comments. Best! Biosthmors (talk) 16:25, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: [1]. Best. Biosthmors (talk) 18:01, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

re destruction

while " reverting is easy" , sourcing is MANDATORY before reinsertion. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:24, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

if no one can come up with sources to support the claims in 5 years of being tagged, then there is very little likelihood that anything that Wikipedia considers of encyclopedic value is actually "lost". -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:08, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Colostomy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

It does not matter who initially added the content. The person adding OR restoring MUST provide reliable sources. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:59, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, Lesion. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Macroglossia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diastema (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FI

Hi Tepi, sorry I haven't checked in at the FI GA review in a bit, Real Life has gotten in the way but as soon as things calm down I will be working on it with you again. Zad68 18:40, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your patience Tepi, I'll be turning attention back to FI in the next day... Zad68 17:28, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Burning mouth syndrome (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Mercury, Depression, Protease inhibitor, Varices and Patch test
Median rhomboid glossitis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Papilla and Sulcus terminalis
Mouth ulcer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Epidermis
Oral candidiasis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Dimorphism
Ranula (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mylohyoid
Trismus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Aspiration

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks a lot for your corrections. I try to do the best I can but I'm not Anglophone... Doc Elisa 07:05, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again for your help in Lower limbs venous ultrasonography. Is hard for someone Portuguese to write in a perfect English. I did too long and complex sentences. English is easier in short and clean phrases. I will remember Regards Doc Elisa 21:58, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I would know if the article I'm doing about Lower limbs venous ultrasonography has some possibilities to be prepared to a FA or PR first. Thank you for you advice. Best regards Doc Elisa 01:19, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Best regards Doc Elisa 10:42, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Illustration workshop from Jdcollins13

Hello, Lesion. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Graphics_Lab/Illustration_workshop#Can_you_make_this_line_diagram_black_and_white.3F.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Task force + WP Dentistry

Why would your WP MED or DENT task force be called "oral medicine" or "oral pathology"? Those sound like odd names for a task force.

And you'd really have to define "active" for me to answer that question. I consider it active, but some other may not. I mean, I do what I do to author and edit articles on Dentistry, but we don't have member meetings or points of focus and people do whatever it is they want to do. So in a sense, we don't have an active project group, but there is certainly still a project and that project is certainly active -- so please don't go deleting anything! :)

Let me know if that answers your question. DRosenbach (Talk | Contribs) 19:57, 19 February 2013 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Lesion. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aphthous stomatitis, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Herpes virus and Aphtha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Teahouse Turns One!

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!


Teahouse First Birthday Badge Teahouse First Birthday Badge
Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year!

To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:43, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Aphthous stomatitis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Serum
Cysts of the jaws (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Enucleation

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't mind

Carrying around the trophy for at least a little while! Enjoy! Biosthmors (talk) 17:26, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you... Lesion (talk) 17:31, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dental implant

Can you take a look at latest edits by Klaus Muller; all his own research with links to his own site. Not sure what to do, the research is primary but seems semi-legit. Assuming good faith but not sure. Constant source of irritation on the dental implant site with links being added. Not sure if they'd ever consider making the page for registered user edits only. Ian Furst (talk) 18:30, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Talk page stalker) WP:COIN might be useful. Biosthmors (talk) 20:45, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Hello, Lesion. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Doc Elisa 11:01, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alveolar osteitis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Posterior, Saline, Pyrogen, Periodontal membrane and Trauma
Mandibular fracture (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Aspiration

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cysts

Hey - thanks for watching mand# - I think the gallery's look pretty good. hoping others will like. I covered, all the cysts but the distinction between odontogenic and developmental is artificial. It's how Neville and Damm makes the distinction (I think it was them). Radicular is inflammatory. The rest are developmental (I think). The better distinction may be odontogenic, cutaneous, mucosal, etc... (e.g. tissue of origin). I covered everything in the book. I don't think mucocele is in there (would have been in salivary gland lesions), and I likely missed some cysts that are exclusive to the neck/digestive track but occur in the neck (some thyroid cyst, branchial pouches, etc...) stuff like that. Regezi and Richards just put out a book, may be a good reference.Ian Furst (talk) 20:34, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mandible fracture classification

thanks for editing. i'm going to leave it alone for a week then come back to reread with a fresh eye. The classification section seems very spread out to me, i'm worried that the layout detracts from the conceptual framework to classify the fracture. what do you think about changing the tertiary headings under location (====alveolar====, ====condylar====, ====body====, etc... to bold headings so the stick together a bit more (alveolar, condyle, body, etc..)?Ian Furst (talk) 00:35, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

thx for the info - will read more on MoS (and be more bold). thx. Ian Furst (talk) 01:21, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anal gland - typo

Please check your recent contribution to Anal gland page – I suppose there's a typo in the image Gray1080.png description ('Not' where probably should be 'Note'). --CiaPan (talk) 22:18, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. If you know anything about comparative anatomy, I suspect there is some confusion going on in this article between "anal glands" present in humans and "anal sacs" present in other species, possibly also called "anal glands" wherein the confusion lies. For instance, humans can't spray a foul substance from these glands like skunks, nor do they secrete scent to mark territory etc. Lesion (talk) 22:29, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I know little about comparative anatomy, and even if I did my English is far too poor to allow me making any substantial contribution in that area. --CiaPan (talk) 22:39, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks for pointing out typo. Lesion (talk) 12:03, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hairy leukoplakia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Candida (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fecal incontinence review...

Hey Tepi, so there's still some work to go with Fecal incontinence, although it's looking much better now. Wizardman (talk · contribs) (GA review specialist) has complained that this is going on for too long (GA review is really only supposed to be a like a week, two weeks tops), and at this point I have made too many edits to the article not to be "involved" with the content, so I realistically cannot be the one who passes the article for GA. I think at some point you said you'd agree to de-listing the article for GA review, finish the work on it, and then come back to nominate it for GA again. Would you be willing to do that? We can continue our GA review-style work, but just end the official GA review nomination. Would you be willing to agree to that? Thanks... Zad68 19:36, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this suggestion was proposed by Biosthmors, and I have no problem with either scenario really. Work has been unusually busy for me atm, but it doesn't look like there is much work on this article left to be done. Even if you feel unable to make the GA decision, thanks a million for your extensive help, I am v grateful and I learned a lot about how to write an article which I have been applying to other pages. Lesion (talk) 00:16, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Great, thanks for understanding, and thank you for the kind words, happy to help! I'll have to end the review by not passing it for GA, as that's what's required by procedure. Let me know if you have any questions or when you might want me to make another pass through the article. Zad68 03:40, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Epulis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sessile (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Submandibular space

Hi, I'm The Wikimon. Lesion, thanks for creating Submandibular space!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Excellent article! Keep it up! a little too technical though...

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. —Preceding undated comment added 16:26, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can add a few more inline citations from the one source I already used, but I don't really have access to the specialized sources that are needed. Hopefully other editors will add these in time... Lesion (talk) 16:32, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wisdom tooth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Operculum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:47, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE: fascial spaces of the head and neck

Hi. I will take a look at them within a couple of days. At first glance it looks good though. You can have a look at the manual of style for medicine related articles especially the anatomy section. One problem with fascial spaces of the head and neck is however our universal Achilles heel in anatomy articles; they are written for people who already have extensive knowledge of anatomy (and this is a very hard fix). One thing that is very important is that at least the last two or three sentences (ideally the whole lead) is written so a layman can understand it. The lead you have written is by far one of the better and I am mostly stating it since people tend to forget this.

As I said. I will look at it within a couple of days when my schedule allow me to work a bit more on Wikipedia. Should I try to make the first attempt on a template? ...and have you thought about also creating a category? JakobSteenberg (talk) 21:33, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The MEDMOS is only guidelines, so you do not have to add sections such as function or other animals. You can also use headings that are not describes such as components or borders. Unless you have a good source for function I would avoid it for most of them (I remember reading in an anatomy book that the function of the maxillary sinus could be reducing the weight of the cranium... with 2 %. Such a claim may be true but it seems like speculations)
I set up a category; Category:Fascial spaces of the head and neck (I am unsure how to make a link to such, but you can copy it into the search field). It is itself categorized under Category:Human head and neck. I will add some of the articles you posted on my talkpage to it tonight. If you want to add any other articles just insert [[Category:Fascial spaces of the head and neck]] into the bottom of the article.
With regards to the template I think they should be added to existing templates AND have a separate.
Again, I will take a look at all the article you posted as soon as I can (I am a bit weight down at the moment). JakobSteenberg (talk) 19:27, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Let me know if you need help with anything... I am not sure I can provide it, but I am willing to try. I am not sure if I mentioned it before, but you might want to check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy and hopefully add your talkpage to your watchlist. We can also need more people with an interest and knowledge of anatomy. JakobSteenberg (talk) 21:35, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Osteomyelitis of the jaws (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Mercury and Anorexia
Garre's sclerosing osteomyelitis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Chronic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:45, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

talkback

Hello, Lesion. You have new messages at IRWolfie-'s talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

HPV +ve oral cancer

Hello. I think 30+ is closer to the truth than 20+, since it is generally believed that an HPV infection takes at least 10 years to progress to cancer. I will not change it. However, I have read of real cases of patients as young as 28. If we take as granted that 15 is the minimum age of a person's first sexual contact, then it is possible that a persisting HPV infection could turn into cancer by the age of 25+. 176.58.163.211 (talk) 15:41, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:17, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leukoplakia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tylosis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leukoplakia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Candida and Pleomorphism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:43, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dimethylsulfidemia

At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dimethylsulfidemia you mentioned you'd be willing to merge appropriate material into halitosis. Instead of deleting the article, I have userfied it to User:Lesion/Dimethylsulfidemia so that you can extract the relevant material. When you're done, simply tag the page with {{db-u1}} and an admin will come along and delete it. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:50, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Canker sores

You cannot be serious. Read the following sentences and tell me you're serious:

Electrical burns in the mouth are fairly common. They are usually caused by chewing on live electrical wiring.

--.froth. (talk) 01:00, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Atypical facial pain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Depression, Dermatome, Autonomic and Psychogenic
Toothache (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Psychogenic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:37, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lesion, I did some research for dietary supplements for Bruxism and couldn't find anything that comes even close to being authoritative. I would remove the complete section. As I'm not involved in this article I'll leave it to you.Sthubbar (talk) 16:55, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lesion, I saw that reference. How is that reference any different than any random blogger's webpage? It says it is one person's experience. I'm all in favor of Dietary Supplement information, as should be evidenced by my temporary ban over the Osteoarthritis page. For Bruxism, including and talk about dietary treatments is equivalent to teaching creationism in elementary schools. A common argument for adding creationism to the school curriculum is something like "We will just mention this without saying if it is true or not and let the students decide. We can even say that most scientists discount this theory." Sorry, no, that is not an acceptable argument for adding this theory, with zero evidence. Same for dietary supplements for Bruxism. There is zero evidence for them. Just because an article is included in Pubmed does not mean it is evidence. Just to say it again, this article you point out appears to have no more validity than any random blogger. If you are going to include mention of it then, I can quickly put up a blog called "BruxismMiracleCureFound.com" and say that injecting snake venom is a cure and you will be compelled to also include that as a possible cure. I strongly suggest removing all mention of dietary supplement cures as per WP:Medicine guidelines.Sthubbar (talk) 19:01, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bruxism may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:52, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Masseter muscle may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:54, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bruxism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trauma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GL Photography reply

Hello, Lesion. Greetings from the Photography workshop. A reply has been made to your request.
If you are satisfied, please copy/paste the following code and add it to your request: {{resolved|1=~~~~}}


You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{GL Photography reply}} template.

--Kevjonesin (talk) 21:18, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting Primary Sources

I hav nothing to do per your orders. I did not delete any material that wuz actually being used. I deleted material from somebody's search and select of pubmed for MMSC. Az for the "yoh mommuh joke", it's a matter of taste, because you should understand that it iz impossible to be that stinky. 75.152.123.238 (talk) 19:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]