Jump to content

User talk:StarryGrandma: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
Line 439: Line 439:


{{Wikipedia:Teahouse/Teahouse talkback|WP:Teahouse/Questions|Citation preferences: {{sfn|name|year|etc.}} versus <ref>{{harvnb|name|year|etc.}}</ref>|ts=[[User:StarryGrandma|StarryGrandma]] ([[User talk:StarryGrandma#top|talk]]) 18:22, 1 July 2014 (UTC)}}
{{Wikipedia:Teahouse/Teahouse talkback|WP:Teahouse/Questions|Citation preferences: {{sfn|name|year|etc.}} versus <ref>{{harvnb|name|year|etc.}}</ref>|ts=[[User:StarryGrandma|StarryGrandma]] ([[User talk:StarryGrandma#top|talk]]) 18:22, 1 July 2014 (UTC)}}

== 08:24:06, 12 July 2014 review of submission by 41.132.199.247 ==
{{Lafc|username=41.132.199.247|ts=08:24:06, 12 July 2014|declined=Draft:Janika_Fabrikant_(painter)}}


[[Special:Contributions/41.132.199.247|41.132.199.247]] ([[User talk:41.132.199.247|talk]]) 08:24, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

My entry on the French-Swiss artist Janika Fabrikant for Wikipedia was rejected. I accept the criticism of the article being "too romantic" and insubstantial. I will rewrite it. I am still convinced that Janika Fabrikant's work merits a Wikipedia entry. My question to you at this stage is: should I enter all her exhibitions, combined and solo that she held throughout the years? Regards Ute Ben Yosef

Revision as of 08:24, 12 July 2014

In response to your feedback


I'm very new to Wikipedia and don't even know where to say thank you...but thanks for your very helpful comments on the Sandra Waxman page.Jwoodring (talk) 18:53, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Usually someone posts a bunch of links on your talkpage when you make your first edits. But perhaps the structure you recommend would be better. Thanks for your input.

Juice Leskinen (talk) 20:32, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 

Welcome!

Hello, StarryGrandma and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Footwarrior (talk) 02:02, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Citations

The documentation for WP:REFNAME and Template:Rp should help you understand how to reference the same source multiple times in one article. Thanks for all the contributions you have already made fixing citations. --Footwarrior (talk) 02:41, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Typo Team Barnstar
For your excellent work in fixing broken references, usually caused by tyos, I hereby award you this Typo Team Barnstar Mjroots (talk) 19:33, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wicked problem

Sorry StarryGrandma, but I have failed your Good article nomination of Wicked problem. There are some good aspects to it, but a major problem is the use of lists. As well as presenting a copyright problem, they also don't make for good prose 9especially in the number that they are presented there). I would suggest converting them to prose, expanding the "Problem Structuring Methods" and then renominating or sending to peer review. Don't be too discouraged, getting an article to Good status can be difficult. AIRcorn (talk) 23:45, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AWB

You started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser on cleanup of ref tags. Nobody else seems to recognise your use of the pipe in the ref markup, and so we perhaps cannot understand your argument. Perhaps you could chime in again and help us out? Mr Stephen (talk) 07:57, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Abigail MacBride Allen

Since you did not accept/decline the submission that I reviewed, I've accepted the article above as a stub. If you haven't noticed, there's an AfC script on your Preferences menu (by default disabled under the Gadgets section). If you're interested in reviewing article submissions at WP:AFC, you really should have this; it makes AfC reviews faster and easier. - hmssolent\Let's convene My patrols 04:51, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For your efforts at AfC to ensure that it was acceptable for inclusion hmssolent\Let's convene My patrols 00:01, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!
Hi StarryGrandma! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Feel free to drop by our website, make a profile and see how else you can participate!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 03:42, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Oak Ridge, North Carolina may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:17, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dalles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice, but this is the needed link in this case. Maybe Dalles shouldn't be categorized as a disambiguation page? StarryGrandma (talk) 19:34, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to AT&T may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Whitacre Tower]], [[downtown Dallas|downtown]] [[Dallas]], [[Texas]].<ref name="Jbodonkor">Godinez">Godinez, Victor and David McLemore. "[http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/stories/JB_DN-
  • more than {{US$|47.7 million}} since 1990, 56% and 44% of which went to [[Republican Party (United States|Republican]] and [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]] recipients,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:22, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Timo Descamps may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • In 2009, Descamps publicly announced his homosexuality and relationship with [[Danny de Jong]].<]].<ref name="homosexuality">[http://www.gva.be/nieuws/media-en-cultuur/aid838459/spring-acteur-timo-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:50, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing out that I forgot to add reference to Kato on unbounded operator. The reference has now been added but I am unsure how to remove your comment on page.Lost-n-translation (talk) 02:00, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sandy Waxman's page

Thanks for your (continuing) comments. I appreciate any help, as I would love for this page to just get published! In answer to your question, yes, there are two Louis W. Menk Psychology Professors (Doug Medin and Sandy Waxman). I've attempted to follow editors' suggestions and Wikipedia guidelines regarding citations, but, while Waxman has published many articles (and has been cited many times by others for one pub in particular), it's not the nature of the Psychology research field for "notable" researchers (other than Freud, Piaget and other extraordinaries) to be written about by others in the field. I'm happy to have all citations about her research removed if that will better satisfy Wikipedia standards. :-) Jwoodring (talk) 15:20, 2 August 2013 (UTC)JWoodring[reply]

Thank you Jwoodring for the information. I am rewriting the page myself as an example of what an academic's page should look like. I'd like to see more women researchers with articles in Wikipedia. I've found enough references by looking up her awards. I am going to try to describe her research and include her papers as references to that. Which of her papers is the one that is most frequently cited? I'll ask you to check what I've written to make sure I have it right. (I need to rewrite the description of Fay Ajzenberg-Selove's work. Whoever wrote it got the physics wrong.)
You are right about the difficulty of finding assessments of researchers work. There are notable researchers who haven't gotten these kind of awards but whose research has had a lot of influence. The best source seems to be obituaries! Not much gets written directly before then. It's tricky. StarryGrandma (talk) 18:11, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mary Daheim may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * King's Ransom 1990)
  • * Improbable Eden 1991)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:53, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nicholas Anthony DiMarzio may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • of Ethnic Ministries, an Office of Black Catholic Ministry, and an Office of Hispanic Ministry].<ref>{{cite web |last=Price |first=Jo |title=The Bishop Nicholas DiMarzio Award for Leadership |

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:43, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nicholas Anthony DiMarzio may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • his installation as Bishop of Brooklyn was to speak at the Immigrant Workers Freedom Ride Rally] at [[Flushing Meadows – Corona Park|Flushing Meadows Park]]. In November 2003 he spoke before

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:52, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, StarryGrandma. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by StarryGrandma (talk) 22:37, 16 August 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hi

Hi

thank you for the changes you have made to the article "Anitha Shaiq" hope forward your help again to make it a slandered one--89.211.99.28 (talk) 19:31, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Interview request: Your interactions with new editors

I'm contacting you about a study that I'm running with TheOriginalSoni exploring newcomer mentorship activities in Wikipedia. I'd like to ask you a few questions about your interactions with newcomers and to explore how a tool like WP:Snuggle might make your work easier. The interview and demo session will take 30 minutes to an hour depending on how much time we spend discussing things. If you're interested, let me know. If not, disregard this message and I won't bother you again.

Thanks for your consideration. --EpochFail (talk • contribs) 15:25, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, StarryGrandma. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by StarryGrandma (talk) 23:36, 30 September 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

AN/I notice

Information icon Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Ownership issue on Federal assault weapons ban page?. Thank you. (This is only in regard to your mentorship of Lightbreather, and is an issue you should be aware of while mentoring. Thank you for agreeing to mentor.) I, JethroBT drop me a line 01:32, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and an invitation

Dear StarryGrandma,

Thanks again for consentoring to my mentoring, which means, of course, thanks for the primo and much-appreciated advice.

I think I want to work on some women's pages, and especially on the gender gap in WP.

I don't know if you've heard of this, but thought you might like to participate: Ada Lovelace Edit-a-thon

I otter be going to my dentist appointment now.

Thanks again.

Your mentee,

--Lightbreather (talk) 15:52, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy as always to help you. I hadn't heard about the edit-a-thon. It's too bad I'm nowhere near Brown University, but that's a great list of women whose articles need work. I once met Vera Kistiakowsky. StarryGrandma (talk) 23:13, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You don't have to be there in-person. You can participate online! Lightbreather (talk) 23:18, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

help with Sandra Waxman page?

Thanks for your comments back in July regarding a page for Sandra Waxman. To be honest, we just want to get the page published; I feel like I've addressed the concerns of editors (and it seems there are published pages that are far less complete), so I'm not sure how to proceed. I would be happy for anyone to edit away (delete whatever is necessary) to get the page into the public eye. Do you have some advice for how we should move this along? Thank you for your thoughts.Jwoodring (talk) 16:12, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. I will approve the article. I gathered some references here then wasn't sure could phrase the research correctly. I heard a lovely interview with her on NPR recently. StarryGrandma (talk) 16:31, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome you! Thank you very much. And yes, the recent publicity was very nice. Thanks again.Jwoodring (talk) 16:38, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hey, thanks for cleaning up the language refs. I updated the populations for a lot of articles, and was too tired to clean up the dependent refs. — kwami (talk) 22:01, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog status - a useful template by User:TheJJJunk

Backlog status (Purge)
Category Current status
Pages with incorrect ref formatting  Not done
Pages with missing references list  Done
Pages with broken reference names Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character ",".

Thanks for your contrib to Wikipedia:Bot requests#New REFBot. BW --Frze > talk 05:08, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Advice?

I stayed away from the assault weapons ban article for 20 days and its talk page for 2 1/2 weeks. Then I posted a suggestion on the talk page re: the article title. An editor there has been after me ever since I asked for her help over two months ago (on an issue that has since been partially resolved). I am editing in good faith, but she is convinced that I am not. If I make edits to the article, she tells me to discuss them first on the talk page. If I start a discussion, she says I'm being disruptive. The net effect of her actions is to discourage me from editing the article - but the article is POV and I want to improve it. Have you ever had to deal with a situation like this? Do you have any advice? Lightbreather (talk) 00:11, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've been thinking about this a bit, and the best advice I have is to stay away from the topic. I know that's hard because this is what drew you to Wikipedia in the first place. I haven't had experience with this editing, but I've seen this happen on other articles. The quasar article went through a long period of problems before it settled down to being a good scientific article. See Talk:Quasar/Archive for 2009#Regression in the quality of the Wikipedia 'Quasar' entry. Sometimes it just helps to go away for a while.
Just keep working on other stuff. Wikipedia really needs people who can write. I started here hoping to work on computer history here and astronomy on the Simple English wikipedia. But I've been doing mostly cleanup instead because I find it hard to compose material into an already existing article. Any suggestions from you would be very welcome. StarryGrandma (talk) 20:27, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Lightbreather, you should listen to your mentor. You are picking up on the AWB article exactly where you left off. That is not good. If you continue, your presence at ANI will likely pick up exactly where it left off. Please don't take it as a threat, I am trying one last time to reach out to you. Listen to what your mentor has told you, it is good advice, I very strongly suggest that you follow it, and work on something other than the AWB article. Seriously. Be well. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 19:55, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Bot requests#New REFBot

Thanks!
Ein Dankeschön!
Frze > talk

05:15, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Request for peer review

Hi, StarryG. I created a request for peer review on the federal assault weapons ban talk page. I used the "subst:PR" template to create it, but maybe I botched it - because it's got a funny looking URL to me. Guess if it shows up on the Peer-review page within an hour, I did it right. I'll watch, and in the meantime look for one or two I might be able to review. Lightbreather (talk) 15:05, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PS: If you're interested, or no someone who might be, this is the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban/archive2#Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban

I decided to tackle a peer-review article myself and decided on one about KFC. What a gas! I hardly ever eat meat and especially fried chicken (unless my husband makes it; he's a Southern boy), but I got so hungry working on it that I took my son out for lunch when he got home from work. Of course, I'm regretting it a little now, but thankfully have antacids on my desk. Ha! Lightbreather (talk) 20:44, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have fun. I'm reading about the Federal Assault Weapons Ban and putting some notes together. StarryGrandma (talk) 20:48, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Can't thank you enough for your review. It will help so much. I wish I'd found you two months ago! Lightbreather (talk) 00:08, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Citation Barnstar
Category:Pages with citation errors - Thanks for your contributions. Please take a look at [1]. I'm unable to find these ref names. Best wishes Frze > talk 05:54, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback would be appreciated

I have written a draft "Context" section in response to your peer review and an informal review by editor Calathan about Oct. 1. Would you please give your feedback on the draft? It is at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban#Context_.283rd_draft.29

Thanks. --Lightbreather (talk) 16:02, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy to read it and let you know what I think. StarryGrandma (talk) 05:31, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm reading but have to go off for a bit. Looking at background information. THOMAS at the Library of Congress is named after Thomas Jefferson. How neat. How neat one can search the Congressional Record. Jefferson would have loved this. You also solved a mystery for me with one of your references, how that "research" provision got in the bill. Thanks. StarryGrandma (talk) 17:23, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, SG. You're my hero. Lightbreather (talk) 17:34, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I went off to the library to get educated this morning. Found the library's brand new copy of Carter's 3-volume "Guns in American Society: An Encyclopedia of History, Politics, Culture, and the Law," 2nd ed. Its so new I think I'm the first one to use it. $284 list price according to the library catalog!
I finished the review and am putting it on the talk page of the article. Don't be discouraged by the amount of rewriting I've suggested. Most public statements by people aren't very useful in an encyclopedia article like this. We need what happened, not what people were saying about it at the time. I haven't tracked down all the information yet that I said should be in there. I'm keeping looking and I'll put it together for you. Fascinating stuff. Happy writing. StarryGrandma (talk) 23:43, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wow! Thanks, SG. You really give 110 percent! I'm not discouraged by your suggestions. Frankly, I used so much so-and-so said because that's how at least half of the article is written. Now, the Criteria section might be a nice summary of the assault weapons detail, except other editors have deemed it appropriate to insert the words "cosmetic" and "mere" there, which seems to me the wrong section for those words (or whether "mere" belongs at all). Also, I think Provisions belongs before Criteria. But I digress...
Tomorrow, I'll be back at my computer (typing this from my phone). Looking forward to reading your review again on a big screen!
Forever in your debt, Lightbreather (talk) 01:23, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I regularly find references to an in-depth Cox Newspapers study from 1989, but have not been able to find a copy. Have you found it anywhere? Lightbreather (talk) 15:12, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Just an update: I am off to my library to look for some of the sources you've suggested that aren't available online. Wish me luck! Lightbreather (talk) 21:34, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I plan to travel to the nearest city with my husband or my sister next week or the week after to access some of the sources there that libraries in my metro area do not have. Hope to finish up a draft Background and legislative history for the federal AWB page in early January. Lightbreather (talk) 00:47, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
PS: That Cox Newspapers series from 1989 was called "Firepower: Assault Weapons in America" by Jim Stewart and Andrew Alexander, though I still haven't been able to get my hands on it. Lightbreather (talk) 00:51, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I will take a look. I've been away from Wikipedia for a while. I think I ran into something related, not the whole series, but maybe the important article or a summary of it. StarryGrandma (talk) 01:04, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. Merry Christmas - or whatever you celebrate this time of year! Lightbreather (talk) 02:26, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year! I finally made the trip to the neighboring city that has a copy of the latest (5th - 2012) edition of Carter's Guns in American Society. Now I'd like to resume the task of adding a Background and legislative history section to the beginning of the Assault Weapons Ban page. I also bought a copy of Spitzer's 5th edition of The Politics of Gun Control. So between those two sources, plus the stuff you and I had already collected, I feel pretty prepared. Are you ready to help? I would be most beholden. Lightbreather (talk) 20:13, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brother Cadfael's Penance, pirated copies?

You deleted all the references to e-book versions found on line. 1. How do you know they are pirated? 2. Did you check each version in the ref list, or see one such, and delete it all? It is still the case it is available for download; perhaps you have a better source reference or would reword the sentence on availability in that mode of publication? That seems better than total deletion without explanation. I marked to watch your talk page to see a reply. Thanks. --Prairieplant (talk) 18:39, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Prairieplant. I checked them all. I hadn't known about such sites until I saw them in the article. EBookEE, ebook, MoreFreeEBooks, BestEBooksFree, and RapidLibrary are all file-sharing services (like the original Napster) where people upload files for others to download for free. Zimbra is a dead link. Making copies of copyrighted material and distributing them and downloading them is illegal. Wikipedia has to be very careful about copyright violations, and it is against Wikipedia policy to have links on article pages to sites that are in violation of copyright. I wish the Cadfael mysteries were available in Kindle and Nook editions, but they don't seem to be. There seems to be no way to get them in ebook form legally for now. So we can't mention in the article that they can be downloaded illegally. StarryGrandma (talk) 03:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Glad you could tell they were violating copyright, I had not known how to detect that. Brother Cadfael's Penance is on Kindle, at least according to the website Fantastic Fiction when I last checked it. I do not have a Kindle, so I cannot say I have tried it. I have not found on line indication of Nook. So people are copying the books from paper to do that? Oh well does not matter, at least it is stopped. I listen to the audio books, and sometimes want to see how a word is spelled, a place name, and usually find it in a Russian service offering the full English text. Not reading Russian well, I ignored it, and simply found the spelling I needed. I was naive, it seems, to think that it was a legit service in Russia for those who are fluent in English. I will look at the other novels in the series for similar entries and delete them. --Prairieplant (talk) 07:12, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can I message you privately?

Hello, StarryGrandma. May I message you privately? There is a problem weighing heavy on me, and I need your help. Lightbreather (talk) 20:06, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 29 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year StarryGrandma!

Happy New Year!
Hello StarryGrandma:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Frze > talk 20:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2014}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Another editor is WP:WIKIHOUNDING me

Hello, dear StarryGrandma.

I've been wondering about this for awhile, but it's become clear to me in recent days that another editor is WP:WIKIHOUNDING me.

No other editor seems to find it necessary to follow me around and revert my edits but this one. It has happened more times than I can count now, and on numerous pages. Would you like me to provide some links?

Please advise.

Thanks.

--Lightbreather (talk) 22:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Electrostatic Spray Ionization

Dear StarryGrandma,

I am the author of the Article Electrostatic Spray Ionization that you kindly refereed. Thank you very much for it. However, before adding it to Electrospray Ionization as you proposed I would like to know why Laser Ablation Electrospray Ionization (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_Ablation_Electrospray_Ionization), which is a comparable technique and article, has been accepted to be an article for its own and Electrostatic Spray Ionization not.

With my best regards,

AnSteLe (talk) 10:18, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AnSteLe. It's nice to see work being done on good science articles for Wikipedia. I suggested adding the material to an existing article because the first paragraph does not provide enough of an explanation for anyone but an expert to know what the article is about. I find it is often easier for new editors to add material to an article that has a good lead paragraph or paragraphs in place than for them to try to put the material into context.
The article Laser Ablation Electrospray Ionization did not go through the Articles for Creation process. The page was written directly into Wikipedia by the original editor, and rearranged a bit by later editors. It had an overview section that became the lead paragraph and describes what is going on enough for physicists at least to know what is happening. It should be made clearer for a wider range of readers, however.
If you wish, write a lead paragraph along the model of the one in Laser Ablation Electrospray Ionization, explaining what happens in the process and what the advantages of using it are. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section for an explanation of what this section should do in a Wikipedia article. Happy editing. StarryGrandma (talk) 05:47, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear StarryGrandma,

thank you very much for your response and suggestions! I will work then on a well written lead paragraph! Thanks and with my best regards, AnSteLe (talk) 22:52, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

This was a very nice example of everything that I love about this project. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 08:10, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

Thanks for helping me add just a slash. --Nahnah4 (talk) 08:40, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Skin Absorption edit

Combined my page with existing page via edit. I hope this works. 570lah (talk) 13:16, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice. Now we have a good article on the subject. Thanks. StarryGrandma (talk) 17:20, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OMG you're in The New York Times

Did you already know this? You're in The New York Times. "http://nytimes.com/2014/01/09/fashion/Wikipedia-Judith-Newman.html"

Get ready for your 15 minutes!  ;-)

Lightbreather (talk) 23:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Digital ceramic printing on glass may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • making printing of all sizes and replacement of any panel simple, in high resolution, full color]].<ref name=Davey2010 /> Unlike UV printing it is suitable for both interior and exterior

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:18, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help, on a 3rr thing

Dear StarryGrandma,

I reported Sue for edit warring today. I thought that process was just between the parties involved and the admin, but I see another editor has weighed in on the issue, so I am asking for your help. The discussion is at "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Sue_Rangell_reported_by_User:Lightbreather_.28Result:_.29" (Trying to insert links on my phone causes problems, so I hope that works.)

As a follow-up to the BLP issue, she finally quit pushing that activist/advocate thing and the article looks pretty good now. The last admin to comment on it, Newyorkbrad even said so. (Thanks, NYB.) And the subject hasn't complained any further, so I think he's satisfied, too. Thanks for your support during that. Lightbreather (talk) 12:05, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LB

Could you give some additional mentoring to LB please? she is doing mass deletions of content [2] [3] [4] in at least one case directly contrary to a consensus discussion she started. Talk:Gun_politics_in_the_United_States#Split_proposal There is an ongoing ArbCom on gun control and gun politics ongoing. Im very tempted to add her as an involved party, or take her to ANI for WP:DE but want to avoid more drama if possible, but she cannot continue editing like this unchecked. Gaijin42 (talk) 19:28, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will see what I can do. StarryGrandma (talk) 20:33, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


CLASS Telescope page

Thanks for approving the CLASS page! I have linked to the article from the List of Cosmic Microwave Background Experiments page. The List of Radio Telescopes seemed to all be deployed telescopes, whereas the List of CMB Experiments included future projects like CLASS. Tom.essinger.hileman (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 13:37, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited APM 08279+5255, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Starburst (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

APM 08279+5255 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to IRAM
Deep-focus earthquake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mantle

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
I award you this barnstar because, every time I run across one of your contributions, I think to myself, "I am glad that StarryGrandma is a Wikipedia editor." Thank you for all that you do. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:25, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thankyou Cullen328 for the encouragement. I really appreciate it. StarryGrandma (talk) 03:32, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 03:35, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Solveig Hisdal) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Solveig Hisdal, StarryGrandma!

Wikipedia editor Carriearchdale just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks

To reply, leave a comment on Carriearchdale's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rachel Whiteread may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[Image:Rachel Whiteread - House.jpg|thumb|right|''House'' (1993], London]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:38, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rachel Whiteread, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DAAD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, StarryGrandma. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by StarryGrandma (talk) 18:22, 1 July 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

08:24:06, 12 July 2014 review of submission by 41.132.199.247


41.132.199.247 (talk) 08:24, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My entry on the French-Swiss artist Janika Fabrikant for Wikipedia was rejected. I accept the criticism of the article being "too romantic" and insubstantial. I will rewrite it. I am still convinced that Janika Fabrikant's work merits a Wikipedia entry. My question to you at this stage is: should I enter all her exhibitions, combined and solo that she held throughout the years? Regards Ute Ben Yosef

  1. ^ name, year & etc.
  2. ^ name, year & etc.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:StarryGrandma&oldid=616629564"