User talk:SwisterTwister: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Anjmani (talk | contribs)
66 edits
No edit summary
Anjmani (talk | contribs)
66 edits
Line 646: Line 646:
He is notable for 2 aspects.
He is notable for 2 aspects.


1. SaR operation of Missing Dornier http://tamil.thehindu.com/tamilnadu/புதுச்சேரி-கடற்பகுதியில்-3வது-நாளாக-விமானத்தை-தேடும்-பணி-தீவிரம்/article7308515.ece and http://www.vikatan.com/article.php?aid=109417
1. SaR operation of Missing Dornier
http://tamil.thehindu.com/tamilnadu/புதுச்சேரி-கடற்பகுதியில்-3வது-நாளாக-விமானத்தை-தேடும்-பணி-தீவிரம்/article7308515.ece
http://www.vikatan.com/article.php?aid=109417


2. He is an ethical hacker (Hacked Windows 10 Login Screen) http://www.thehindu.com/features/kids/a-selftaught-hacker-tells-us-what-hacking-is-all-about/article7795997.ece
2. He is an ethical hacker (Hacked Windows 10 Login Screen)
http://www.thehindu.com/features/kids/a-selftaught-hacker-tells-us-what-hacking-is-all-about/article7795997.ece
Video uploaded by himself: Proof of Concept - Hacking Windows 10 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmpcceM0eV0

Revision as of 06:24, 3 November 2015

≥Please sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~) and please be as specific as possible. Generally, I will reply here so please watch this page for a response.

New users: If you want to learn the basics of Wikipedia, my page for new users here contains useful information. Information such as citing sources, submitting images and changing & deleting username. If that page hasn't answered your question(s), contact me here.

Talk page watchers are welcome to answer if I am unavailable at the time.

Wikipedia ad for Wikipedia:WikiProject Islands
Wikipedia adsfile info – show another – #245

Please help me to create this wikipage! It keeps getting rejected even after I used the suggested template.

Version One Ventures page. Any suggestions or edits you can help me apply?

Johnsonclaire770 (talk) 14:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


01:01:22, 22 October 2015 review of submission by 189.202.87.41


You claimed "the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Search Internet Optimization instead". Search Internet Optimization is the name of the article written yet you claim I can find it as that same title. This is clearly flase as a quick wikipedia search will show you no such article exists. Please either clarify what you meant or provide a valid reason for why the article was not approved.

Request on 01:55:17, 22 October 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Graffitihistory


Hello. Thanks for looking. Did you make any edits to the page? site seems to indicate that my draft is the most recent edit but a lot of the in-line citations that I added recently are missing. Perhaps I lost a version by failing to save or something... anyway... I have cited a number of reputable sources . I'm just learning the ways of wikipedia. Can you please help me understand which facts need more citations or better citations? I had left out any site that dealt with the subject commercially but then I was told I could use those sites for sources on simple, non-controversioal facts so I put some in... I could probably link to archive.com pages also. Is that allowed? I am motivated to contribute because I happen to posses a wealth of info on an obscure but important subject. Expert help would be greatly appreciated.

I could really use some help with the layout & infobox. I've acquired some fair-use images I can add also.

Graffitihistory (talk) 01:55, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you!

I also thought that block was unnecessary. Have a cupcake and enjoy your day. Supdiop (T🔹C) 05:22, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tea

Oooh, lovely - just the thing on a crisp fall night. I shall enjoy it with great gusto. Many thanks, and happy editing! --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:27, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the tea

Cute puppy is watching
Tea is also refresing in a Southern hemisphere summer. :) Coolabahapple (talk) 05:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

08:46:20, 22 October 2015 review of submission by Sandra Buholzer


The subject has notabilty as an actor.

Hello, please could you advise on changes to make. The subject is not a minor actor and non of the roles are background. All of the television appearances have been broadcast on the main terrestrial channels in the UK, Germany and US. Many of the television appearances have been leading guest roles, with him playing the titular role in TATORT: DER TOTE CHINESE. Should all this information be also included in the career section? Your advice is much appreciated. Thanks

Relisting AfD

I just saw the history of WP:Articles for deletion/Casey McKee. I'd like to point out that the nominator of an article at AfD is not supposed to relist the same discussion. Relisting is one of several possible actions to be taken by a closer-to-be after assessing consensus as it stands at the time, and the nominator or any other participant can not do that, see WP:RELIST. Also, participants must not undo AfD closures, and non-admins are not supposed to revert admin closures anyway (RoySmith is an admin). Kraxler (talk) 09:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you twice reverted an administrator's closure, including mine, of that AfD which you yourself started. That is disruptive editing - it is an administrator's job to close AfDs, not an involved editor's job. If you disagree with a closure, you may contest it at WP:DRV. If I see you doing something like that again, I will block you for considerably longer than three hours.  Sandstein  11:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to pile on but as someone who follows IAR on a daily basis even I wouldn't revert 2 admins (I wouldn't even revert 1!), I've more than once disagreed with AFD outcomes but at the end of the day you accept it and move on .... There's no point reverting everyone as it'll lead to blocks and to be totally honest you were extremely lucky to get away with a 3 hour block!, Anyway put it all behind you and move on! :) –Davey2010Talk 11:58, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Steve McCormick (executive) improvements

Thanks SwisterTwister for helping incorporate Steve_McCormick_(executive) into Wikipedia! The page was assessed as Start-Class. Are there any specific suggestions? I am happy to work to make it better! Econohammer (talk) 15:44, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Every time I have my afternoon cup of tea, I enjoy watching a little cutie very similar to this one . Cheers!

DVdm (talk) 18:16, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: A cup of tea for you!

Thank you very much. Although it's spring here, a cup of tea is always welcome. E. Feld talk 18:46, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What's with all of the tea, are you thinking about an RfA? Liz Read! Talk! 22:00, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Liz Haha, quite the opposite actually (hoping to cause some cheer across Wiki rather than the drama) and this actually related to the email I'm going to send (I swear I sent it so it must've been a system malfunction). SwisterTwister talk 22:28, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, since many user talk page messages are complaints, it's always nice to get a positive one. Liz Read! Talk! 23:51, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thank you for your work on here to improve articles! You are appreciated! —МандичкаYO 😜 00:19, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) has been accepted

Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 01:23, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tea

Thank you for the tea! I hope my comment wasn't too aggressive to you. There's been a lot of AFDs on oldest people articles and those articles have had a sock and meat puppet farm for over a decade on them. That's why there's ARBCOM restrictions on the subject. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:00, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reviewing the article I've been working on. And thanks for the pointers. EH25 (talk) 10:43, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stanley Silverman

Hi there,

Thanks for your feedback on the Stanley Silverman draft page. Could you please be more specific about the references not 'being what they could be'? I have used a broad range of online sources to reference my facts so I'm not sure what more I should be looking for right now. Happy to do it of course but would like a little guidance on where they can be improved.

Thanks so much, Devushkao (talk) 16:22, 23 October 2015 (UTC)PK[reply]

18:56:41, 23 October 2015 review of submission by Sahni.sartaj


Can you be more explicit about what is needed to get approval? Thanks.

Exactly what I said there, it needs any more available sources and it's better if the URL links are clickable. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 19:09, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22:12:20, 23 October 2015 review of submission by BioWriter818


Hi,

Thank you for your feedback! I have a question for you: a lot of the references we have for Maralou's information are in articles published back in the 1940s-1960s, which of course aren't readily available online but we do have the hard copy clippings. Is that not adequate enough for Wikipedia? If these articles were scanned and uploaded, would that work?

If this isn't an option, would it help if I edited and shortened the article down so that just the information that can be referenced is written? There are several online articles from the Los Angeles Times dating back to the 1980s where she is mentioned and quoted, and that is a verifiable source.

Thank you! BioWriter818 (talk) 22:12, 23 October 2015 (UTC)BioWriter818[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hi, how I can become Autopatrolled , can you help me ? Kurdistantolive (talk) 03:29, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Kurdistantolive See WP:Autopatrolled and afterwards, Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled. I'm one myself and a NPP so it is useful. SwisterTwister talk 03:36, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for the delicious cup of tea. To return the favor, please enjoy this steaming, hot cup of coffee on me. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I need some help in Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
Thank you
Kurdistantolive (talk) 16:56, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

not notable?

Read the posts - including Under Secretary General of the UN, and a number of other positions any of which on their own officially are covered by the notability guidelines. Collect (talk) 18:42, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

inre: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Burnham

WP:BEFORE finds the man spoken of in detail in numerous reliable sources here and here. Either the UN-published source is complete fantasy or the nominator simply thinks so. Which do you think? Care to give your delete a reconsideration? Cheers. Schmidt, Michael Q. 20:34, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help! Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ossett_Town_Ladies_FC

Hi SwisterTwister. You mentioned that you feel the article should be deleted until there is better improvement. Would you be able to advise where, in your opinion, the article could be improved? I wasn't sure if notability simply extended to media coverage (of which has been referenced) or if there were other examples that could be given. Best wishes -- Minnowfire (talk) 21:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello David, can you examine the page Internet Horror Movie Database and the sources and to add your vote on the AfD page? Thanks Pizzole (talk) 00:27, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mesfer Al-Qahtani

You noted the article is an orphan, however it is linked from 2005 FIFA Club World Championship squads (though perhaps wasn't when you searched previously because of a spelling difference - however that was fixed before the AFD started). Also I've added references to the article that I think demonstrate the subject's notability under WP:NFOOTBALL. Nfitz (talk) 01:07, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Nfitz: I don't think editors should be expected to be fluent in Arabic, can you find any English sources? Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 01:21, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this English source does indicate that he played for Ittihad FC in the 2005 FIFA Club World Championship entering in the 69th minute - http://www.fifa.com/clubworldcup/matches/round=47350500/match=47350006/index.html
If you click on his name, it goes to his FIFA player record - http://www.fifa.com/fifa-tournaments/players-coaches/people=197986/index.html which was added to the article by User:Jogurney in a June 2010 edit[1]. Nfitz (talk) 01:37, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I came across another English sources. Here's a reference[2] to his March 25th 2003 goal for Ittihad FC in a league match over Al-Riyadh SC (which was later relegated). Nfitz (talk) 02:37, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Eugenio B. Bito-onon Jr.

Hi, thanks for reviewing this article. I reviewed the notability guidelines for politicians, and I believe that the person in question does qualify. Although he doesn't hold a high-level position (#1), I believe that he does easily pass #2. I believe that he also passes "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article" (#3). I doubt there's another mayor from the Philippines that's been interviewed internationally as often as Bito-onon, so I disagree with your assessment that the person lacks notability. I was thinking of placing this draft up for discussion at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard, but it appears that another user was criticized for taking notability claims to that board, so where should I post this if I want to have others discuss the notability of this article? Thanks! Fraenir (talk) 04:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Spireon

Hi SwisterTwister, thank you for your comments in regards to the Draft:Spireon. Can you let me know how many more sources should be added for the approval of this article?

Thanks.

Lambao.truong (talk) 16:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lambao.truong However many there are available. SwisterTwister talk 16:20, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks again for the tea, here's some coffee to keep you going! samtar {t} 16:19, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help with AfD nomination?

I created Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vic Piano to nominate that page for deletion, but it seems not to have appeared in the log Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2015_October_26, although I believe I correctly followed the steps. What did I do wrong? David.thompson.esq (talk) 18:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Post-SSRI Sexual Dysfunction

I noticed that you recently accepted this draft article and moved it into article space. If I recall correctly, this topic has been a source of heated debate and intense POV pushing in the recent past and it was the subject of an AFD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post-SSRI sexual dysfunction. It appears to me that the re-creation of this article through AFC is an attempt to get around the AFD result. In fact, it may even qualify for speedy deletion per WP:CSD#G4 because it is a copy of the article that was discussed at AFD. Deli nk (talk) 19:47, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Paine Ellsworth. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Marie Celeste, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Pleasant pathways, Painius  21:15, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding my page creation

Hello,

I would like you to take a look at the page you had reviewed before. I added more sources and I think it's ready now.

Here's the link again. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Youssef_El_Deeb

Would appreciate if you could review and let me know

Thank you :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hebaseham (talk • contribs) 08:35, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging users to AfD discussions

I notice that you sometimes ping users to AfD discussions. Why did you ping Davey2010 to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Elizabeth Hallam? The user has not contributed to the article. You may want to read up on WP:CANVASSING in the event you're not aware of this guideline page, as such pings could be interpreted as such depending on the context of the situation, particularly if it's likely that the user will agree with your commentary at the discussion. North America1000 12:42, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • (talk page stalker) - Northamerica1000 Well the ping failed anyway so had no idea until just now, I was pinged before by ST but assumed I edited the article .. So perhaps I never did!?, Anyway ST NA1k's correct - You shouldn't be pinging everyone unless they've participated in the previous AFD (That's the limit as far as I know). Cheers, –Davey2010Talk 12:52, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Another(talk page stalker) - I, along with few other editors who work in India-related articles, received a ping regarding an old Bollywood film AfD (non of us had edited the article prior to this and we differ in our ways and views of editing here). I don't find that to be wrong, but actually helpful. At AfDs, any insight from editors who work around that specific area is pretty helpful. That's what Dave was trying to do in my understanding. Not to get editors to agree to his commentary but for the article to be reviewed by a few extra pair of eyes. Best, Yash! 13:39, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yash! Yes, that is accurate and the more clearer comments at AfD, the merrier. Davey2010 I wasn't sure if to ping you but I know you're interested with that subject if you know what I mean. SwisterTwister talk 17:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh ... well thanks :), Unfortunately it can be perceived as canvassing but meh I'm not all that fussed - I guess if you were canvassing you'd be pinging half of the site , Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 17:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Provide rationale

  • Hi SwisterTwister: You should consider providing reasons in AfD nominations when you ping those that you consider to be "interested users". For example, at the AfD discussion, for Megatrax Production Music, User:Walter Görlitz stated "...I don't know why I was summoned". This comes across as a potential canvassing matter, because it could be interpreted that you may ping users that may agree with your opinion. North America1000 14:45, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

00:40:55, 28 October 2015 review of submission by Andazuma


Thanks Twister… Please see revised.

03:21:14, 28 October 2015 review of submission by Boatswi


Ok, I updated this page with more information.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjay Asthana has been accepted

Sanjay Asthana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 06:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm JamesChen2003. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Political positions of Ben Carson, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. JamesChen2003 (talk) 16:14, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten on patrol

Thanks for patrolling my article, I appreciate it!

Zamorakphat (talk) 04:29, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The subject is not yet properly Studied understand it please

Draft:Hagalavadi What I have submitted the articles are not yet properly studied and there are studied materials but they are in different old Universities' library. But Now I am not able access them.My articles is going on rejections but my article elements are absolutely true and I have taken the sources from some less stable links,but you are not understanding. you are going on rejection.Give me the guidence What I will make?

Nina Kossman article

Hello,

You commented that you are not sure about Nina Kissman's article. Can you say why?

Thank you.

NorieNC (talk) 03:22, 30 October 2015 (UTC) NorieNC --NorieNC NorieNC (talk) 03:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

07:47:08, 30 October 2015 review of submission by 129.16.140.94


Hi,

You reviewed my page on the Gothenburg Award for Sustainable Development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Gothenburg_Award_for_Sustainable_Development and declined it since it needs more sources. I have 14 different independent sources which are NOT from the Award's own site. Examples are: Kofi Annan Foundation (no 11) and Lund University (no 17). I don't know what more to do! Is that really not enough? I see so many different pages with much less sources. Please advise.

Best regards,

Rebecka

08:30:46, 30 October 2015 review of submission by Guriromtveit


Could you be more specific as to where sources are missing? Thanks!

Declined Article

Hello Sister Twister, I see that you declined my article (Draft:First Order (Star Wars). Thank you for leaving feadback but I need help. How can I make my article "solid" and "have independent notability"? JLanzer (talk) 10:33, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Article

Hi SwisterTwister,

You reviewed my page about Tino Sanandaji https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Tino_Sanandaji and declined it since it needs more sources that show he is a notable person. I have 16 sources. Tino is a highly notable person in Sweden.

He already has a swedish wikipedia site at https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tino_Sanandaji

I don't know what more to do. Is that really not enough? I see so many different pages with much less sources. Please advise. Could you be more specific or maybe help update the page?

Kind regards,

Knut

Talkback

Hello, SwisterTwister. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megatrax Production Music.
Message added 14:54, 30 October 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

North America1000 14:54, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Amazing patroller great work. Keep it up! Vinay089 (talk) 14:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Football articles

Enrique Zschuschen meets WP:NFOOTBALL as he was an international player, needs improving though; I have PRODded the other two though as they appear to be non-notable. GiantSnowman 16:31, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kenneth Mahood proposed article and the Golden Rule.

I'm aware of Wikipedia's guidelines for notability and the need for secondary sources which show it.

Regarding your request

"Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia," and your advice to consult WP:Golden Rule, I did so.

Before resubmitting the article, I added several secondary sources which do what you ask:

Reference 1 is a summary of Kenneth Mahood's career published by the British Cartoon Archive, an activity supported by the British Arts and Humanities Research Council. While insufficient on its own to establish the notability of Kenneth Mahood, this article is a secondary source not written or supported by the "topic." It meets the criteria set forth in your and PrimeFac's requests and WP:Golden Rule.

In fact, not a single one of my sources has any direct, primary source relationship to the article's subject.

Each reference is third-party, and when they are advertisements, these are either auction pages in which the author's notability is assumed (for very few people bid on obscure or unimportant artists without the sort of build-up that is absent in these web references - these are auctions "banking" on Mahood being not only notable but having been well-known during his heyday), or reproductions of Mahood's work for the very notable New Yorker magazine which won acclaim. One such reference listed Mahood's work being selected as one of the hundred best cartoons published in an 80-year period by the New Yorker.
Each reference links to a live, verifiable external Web page unconnected to Kenneth Mahood personally with one exception, the notice in his employer from 1971-2008, the Daily Mail announcing his retirement from the newspaper and detailing his years of service as one of the Daily Mail`s premier cartoonists during that period.

Reference 2 is a review of Mahood's book Name Droppings by critic Win Wiacek in which Mahood's notability was discussed in paragraph one:

"Another prolific but criminally all-but forgotten staple of British cartooning is Kenneth Mahood, whose darkly dry and merrily mordant panel gags were a mainstay of humour mags, cartoon-book racks and newspapers from 1949 to the end of the 1980s."

Reference 3 is still another secondary source stating that Mahood worked in collage and his work was exhibited in New York and Dublin.

Reference 4 is Blouin Art Info International's Web page on Kenneth Mahood by a third party describing how his art has sold from 2001 - 2009. I submit that significant sales volume of an artist on the world market is evidence of his notability - people have recognized Mahood, respect his artistic ability, and purchased his art.

Reference 5 is a collection of cartoons published by Kenneth Mahood by the renowned British humor magazine Punch (magazine) over many years, evidence that Mahood enjoyed popularity during that time as evidenced by his continued appearance in a very popular humor magazine with an international readership.

Reference 6 is another third-party online collection of Kenneth Mahood's work for Punch (magazine) listing two covers of Punch done by Mahood with the sidebar note:

"Punch Cartoons
Original Punch magazine front covers from the 1950s and 1960s by some of the finest cartoonists and illustrators of their day."

indicating this was a description of Mahood during the time he contributed to Punch.

I should have preceded Reference 7 - the secondary source citation describing what the "Punch Table" is as a way of establishing why Mahood's election to it further establishes his notability with a citation of Reference 1, which tells us he was elected to the Punch Table - a signal honor bestowed by Britain's premier humor magazine at the time Mahood worked there, and strong evidence of his notability. I have corrected this error now.

Reference 8 is a tribute by the Daily Mail to Kenneth Mahood on his retirement from that publication, detailing his contributions to the magazine and his prowess as a cartoonist and artist. I think it's supporting evidence of Mahood's notability, specifically:

"Ken Mahood, our brilliant, award-winning pocket cartoonist, is leaving the Mail after more than 27 years of entertaining readers with his wit, satire and sharp comment on the news of the day"

and

"In 1966, Mahood became the first-ever political cartoonist on The Times" -

two indications that Kenneth Mahood was extremely notable as cartoonists go.

Reference 9 is a blog entry by artist Shelley Davies showing more Punch covers done by Kenneth Mahood, and also collages of his on exhibit at the time at Whyte's Gallery, more evidence of his notability during his career at Punch and his more recent notability as an artist exhibiting at Whyte's Gallery.

References 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 establish more of the body of Mahood's work - covers for the New Yorker magazine this time - and the current commercial demand for copies of previously published work of Kenneth Mahood.

Reference 15 is a notice of the Wiley publishing house's release of a collection of the 100 best cartoons published by the New Yorker - a magazine of international renown and large circulation - in which Kenneth Mahood's work is featured. This establishes Kenneth Mahood's recognition and notability as a notable cartoonist in a very competitive field.

References 16 and 17 establish Kenneth Mahood's status as a published author. Reference 17 was cited earlier as a critic's recognition as a very popular cartoonist from 1949 to the late 1980s.

I'm having difficulty understanding why these secondary articles and other supporting references not directly associated with the subject of the article (he never wrote any of them, he doesn't stand to benefit from any of the advertisements of his work I listed - instead, these are amazon.com and other online resellers advertising the work of a notable, acclaimed cartoonist, artist and published author, but without any authorization or other direct connection to Kenneth Mahood himself) aren't enough documentation of Kenneth Mahood's notability.

Looking around wikipedia, it seems to me that the criteria in WP:Golden Rule were met completely. Thousands of our articles on other topics are nowhere near this well-sourced. I invite your discussion on this topic. loupgarous (talk) 22:37, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For your information, I've also added citations for the section "Books by Kenneth Mahood" - information on each book listed is sourced. loupgarous (talk) 23:15, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please see WP:AUTHOR as well. I think my sources meet those specific criteria. loupgarous (talk) 23:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rubin & Chapelle has been accepted

Rubin & Chapelle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 04:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11:27:31, 31 October 2015 review of submission by Mrr2015


This is my first article submission, but it is not my creation. It is a simple translation of the Jan Rejsa page that already exists on the Czech-language Wikipedia site, so the article has of course already been accepted there.

I am curious as to why the change to English would then require more sources? Also, since many of the sources are libraries and catalogs, it wouldn't seem more were needed (existence is verified). Perhaps if you could tell me what you would like to see better sourced I could work on that?

Thank you,

Mrr2015 (talk) 11:27, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am perplexed

I just looked at Category:Pending AfC submissions in article space and fund several that you have accepted in there, but cannot see why. I will bet you can;t either. Since you use the script I have no clue what is happening. This is just fyi. Fiddle Faddle 12:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bob Hardwick (and the cup of tea for me)

Hello, SwisterTwister, and thank you for the tea; I was honored to be included in the selection of editors you recently recognized with WikiLove. I am reposting the question I asked you two weeks ago, because it was archived without being addressed. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 13:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to help a new editor who came to the Teahouse looking for direction on improving Draft:Bob Hardwick so that it can pass AfC review. However, I myself am not clear on why the submission was declined. There are three references cited which are from reliable sources and constitute more than mere mentions of Hardwick and his band; and they have performed at a notable event, namely the Obama inauguration, which seems to satisfy another of the specific music-related notability criteria. (Apparently the band also played the Kentucky Derby, per cited sources, though that isn't mentioned in the article as yet; I'm not sure whether performing at that event would also contribute towards notability.) Could you explain why the cited sources do not establish Hardwick's notability, and/or specify what kind of sources or other proofs of notability would be sufficient? Thanks in advance, GrammarFascist contribstalk 19:14, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Hey GF, the article looks good frankly but I also wonder if the amount of sourcing could be enhanced to at least include any more available ones. SwisterTwister talk 17:24, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi ST, thanks for clarifying. There didn't seem to be much in recent Google News results but plenty turned up in scanned older newspapers. I added two minor sources and one meaty one (Palm Beach Daily News) and some content I pulled from those sources, and re-submitted the article. I'm willing to add more sources if you would like; finding them isn't the issue so much as finding the time to do the edits adding them into the article. Thanks again! —GrammarFascist contribstalk 18:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Still it the subject of less studied topic

It is still the less studied subject thatswhy I am not providing you the references sufficiently.I would like to ask you to publish this article for the guidelines of public please — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.15.85.40 (talk) 15:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

20:33:13, 31 October 2015 review of submission by Esmenkah


Hello, I just added some references to show verifiability of the award recipients. Is that enough please?

Thank you.

20:35:45, 31 October 2015 review of submission by Esmenkah


Hello, I just added some references to show verifiability of the award recipients. Is that enough please?

Thank you. Esmenkah (talk) 20:35, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

01:55:03, 1 November 2015 review of submission by Wendell Smith


Dear Twister, Thanks you for your review and feedback. Would it be possible to accept the article on Ramon Guthrie as I have recently edited it (I struck out the time line and left just the introduction and bibliography and added a few additional references) until such time as I can compose a suitable biography? I have written both Sally M. Gall and Michael Brazillier at Persea Books about using the biographic note that Sally wrote for Maximum Security Ward and Other Poems. I have yet to hear from Michael; Sally seems amenable to this plan, but she will not be back in the country and able to deal with the issue in detail until after November 20. Would it be possible to use her work then? If you need to see what that would be, I have a copy of it in WORD that I could past in here. Although I am contemplating writing a biography of Guthrie, using, or leaning heavily on Sally's work would be what I would like to do at this time. In the meantime could we go with the minimal article as it now stands?

Sincerely yours,Wendell Smith (talk) 01:57, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Wendell Smith Wendell Smith (talk) 01:55, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Wendell Smith[reply]

Articles for creation: International Project Management Association

@SwisterTwister. Dear David, I am attempting to create a page on the IPMA. I understand the requirements (read the entire wikipedia help section on notable, incl. golden rules etc). In my 4 attempts of getting the article approved, I have every time added external references from either books (not from IPMA but from external studies), newspapers or professional journals, 3rd parties newspaper (2nd rejection directed to do so) as well as notable organisations who are using the IPMA for improving their operations. Some of the Wiki link I created contains reference of IPMA as well (and I am trying to fill the gap to the missing article). I am writing to you so you can help me better understand what I am missing. Maybe you could help me understand first me why the references I mentioned above are not considered to support the guideline for "notability". I would also very much appreciate to understand the review process which would help me understand how the article is been reviewed so that I can complete it adequately. Many thanks in advance. Cedrik Cznal (talk) 07:03, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As I said at the draft, the article looks good but could still use any more available sources. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 07:06, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I was just going to write back (only noticed the comment, still learning), so I need more external references basically. ok. I'll add more. Thanks. Cznal (talk) 07:12, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your rejection of the Yannis Tseklenis article

I read your advice / suggestion ,thank you. I see your point. The problem is my subject (the person ) was internationally famous mainly during the 1960s and 70, and although there were many articles written about him in the international press of the time, this was the pre - Internet era so I cannot link to any of these as references as they are not online. What do I do in such cases? Akouzi (talk) 08:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rejected article

Thank you for the suggestion. I see your point, but my subject was internationally famous mainly during the 1960s and 70s, and all international press coverage about him from that time is not available online. What do I do in such a situation? (Akouzi (talk) 08:51, 1 November 2015 (UTC)) Akouzi (talk) 08:51, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reveiw of submission on Iuventum by Rudraaksh24

Why has the article been declined? Rudraaksh24 (talk) 10:45, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rejected article on Obsidian Portal

Thank you for taking the time to review the article.

In your feed back you state "This is a start but still needs any more available sources overall." can you please clarify what you mean? I assume this means that more/different references are needed to back up the information already presented? Can you please provide a bit more guidance as to what you feel is lacking?

Best Regards

Nick

NikMak71 (talk) 13:44, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

02:30:53, 2 November 2015 review of submission by Madisonwalsh1



Hi! How can I improve this page so it can be accepted? You said you want more "available sourcing", what does this mean?

Thanks!!

Madisonwalsh1 (talk) 02:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tea

I had it with a bit of lemon to match the sourness of other Wikipedia editors and some sugar to match your thoughtfulness. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 02:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 08:56:41, 2 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by AsmithHull1993


I don;t understand what you mean re. my recent submission, you have not accepted and given 'add any more available coverage overall' as the reason why, what does that mean?


AsmithHull1993 (talk) 08:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your rejection of the Spottoon article

Hi, I was hoping you could help me further. What do you mean by more available coverage? Do you mean newspaper sources? Thank you for your help!

Syc916 (talk) 09:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11:05:40, 2 November 2015 review of submission by Prabhat 9



Hello, This is in respect to the article on "Ritu Pathak". I think I have furnished enough information in the article about the personality.I also produced whichever relevant sources were present on the internet.I have included sections relating to her early life,career,discography and even awards & nominations...I was wondering what else needs to be added...!!! Could you please guide me to improve the article so that it can meet the standards...?? Prabhat 9 (talk) 11:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11:13:42, 2 November 2015 review of submission by Prabhat 9



Hello, This is in respect to the article on "Ritu Pathak". I think I have furnished enough information in the article about the personality.I also produced whichever relevant sources were present on the internet.I have included sections relating to her early life,career,discography and even awards & nominations...I was wondering what else needs to be added...!!! Could you please guide me to improve the article so that it can meet the standards...?? Prabhat 9 (talk) 11:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

14:27:24, 2 November 2015 review of submission by 128.228.143.215



I do not understand why this article is being rejected. It is sourced by a wide variety of media and scholarly outlets. One can find sources of its authors all over the web. In fact, many are well-documented on Wikipedia (including its founders, which are specifically mentioned on the Italian American article).

Rarely does a publisher have many articles on themselves specifically, articles tend to focus on individual publisher's catalog – unless they have been around for 50+ years or are media outlets for giant corporations.

128.228.143.215 (talk) 14:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

15:21:39, 2 November 2015 review of submission by GeekPhotog


Thanks for your note on the DxO ONE draft. I've added references from coverage in WSJ, USA Today, CNET, Verge, Mashable, and a couple others. I think that is what you were asking for, so I've re-submitted.[[[User:GeekPhotog|GeekPhotog]] (talk) 15:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:41:05, 2 November 2015 review of submission by RobertCumming


Hello, thank you for reviewing my article on the Inverse Warburg Effect. Are you simply requesting that I add more references or do you require further explanation in the text?

Thanks,

16:46:00, 2 November 2015 review of submission by Cash1991


Well, I'm not requesting a re-review just yet, I'm just asking for clarification. By 'more available coverage' do you mean I need to find more varied sources or I just need to include more details about the event and how it took place? Or both? Thanks for your assistance!

Request on 16:50:59, 2 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by ObsoleteTruthyness


Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the article I submitted for publication. The feedback you provided is confusing and needs clarification. When it was first submitted and rejected, the reason given was that there weren't enough qualifying and acceptable references. Fair enough. I provided more qualifying and acceptable references. And now it is being rejected because it needs "any more available coverage"...? This does not make any sense and this reason was not provided as a rejection initially. Your feedback is also confusing, which makes an already difficult task even harder. Here is the feedback you provided me:

"This still needs any more available coverage and by the way once the references are listed, there's no need to list all of them under the references section. Cheers,"

Thank you for the tip on not needing to list the references again; I thought it was only listed once but it looks like they may have been duplicated. But thanks for the word of advice anyways.

Please provide me with better, clearer and more comprehensible reasons as to why you are rejecting this article, as the reasons you provided do not seem in line with Wikipedia policy nor do they make any sense.

All the best,

ObsoleteTruthyness (talk) 16:50, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

17:32:18, 2 November 2015 review of submission by Faradize


I wanted to know if there were clearer reasons as to why the article wasn't accepted.

19:21:38, 2 November 2015 review of submission by Xenith


Thanks for reviewing the draft in which I submitted and providing comments within. I went ahead and added another notable source from Venturebeat, one of the largest tech publications in the gaming space, from the recent week. The company and game recently won a competition in which showcased several other notable gaming companies and should suffice to vouch for the notability of the game Shop Heroes and the company behind it, Cloudcade. Please note that there are also 9 total citations, from a slew of credible websites and sources in which consists of a mix of business, tech and gaming publications. The company and game itself was also recently featured by both Apple and Google Play in their "Top New Games" spot which is not an easy feat in itself. I hope that this additional source and a bit of elaboration on the company itself will prove it to not be promotional but rather to list a notable company/product on Wiki.

I went ahead and re-submitted with changes and will add more sources as I find them available on the internet.

Citrix Receiver

Thank you for accepting my draft for the Citrix Receiver entry! As I mentioned in a comment with my submission, I have a screenshot of the product that can be added to the article's infobox. I just uploaded it and you can find it here. Would you be able to add it in? I understand if you don't have time, I just wanted to ask you first, since you created the article. Thanks! Heatherer (talk) 20:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 21:42:31, 2 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Ovidiu.iordache


Hello! Thanks for reviewing the article I want to create. Until now, the article was declined so I would like to make it happen. :) I've added 3 more References to the draft (starting from 1 to 3 - at the top of the References list). I would like to say that the song I'm writing about is sung by a singer who is not a mainstream artist; as we know it is very hard for an artist who's age is over 40 to get mainstream airplay. Although the news regarding the release of the single named "Clipe" was published on various online newspapers, including MTV and also mainstream radio website Radio Zu, the song did not managed to get mainstream airplay. But it was heavily played on the main national channel of The Romanian Radio Broadcasting Company and also on various regional radio stations across the country. Actually the fact that the song was not being played by the mainstream radio stations, it means that the single was not eligible to chart. Anyway, the song is the most popular single released by the singer, since her 2008 Eurovision Song Contest Entry. If you consider these facts strong enough to allow the article on Wikipedia, I would thank you! Bye-Bye!(Ovidiu.iordache (talk) 21:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Ovidiu.iordache (talk) 21:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 06:15:54, 3 November 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Gayatri.radhakrishnan


<Gayatri.radhakrishnan (talk) 06:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC) Hi Swisstalk, My article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:KAYA_LIMITED was declined. Just was curious to know the exact reason. i mean could you be more specific as to what needs to be changed. Because 2nd time i had changed the tone of the article also had provided references from authoritative sources.[reply]

Would appreciate your feedback on the same.

Many Thanks,

Gayathri>


Gayatri.radhakrishnan (talk) 06:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

06:20:09, 3 November 2015 review of submission by Anjmani


He is notable for 2 aspects.

1. SaR operation of Missing Dornier http://tamil.thehindu.com/tamilnadu/புதுச்சேரி-கடற்பகுதியில்-3வது-நாளாக-விமானத்தை-தேடும்-பணி-தீவிரம்/article7308515.ece http://www.vikatan.com/article.php?aid=109417

2. He is an ethical hacker (Hacked Windows 10 Login Screen) http://www.thehindu.com/features/kids/a-selftaught-hacker-tells-us-what-hacking-is-all-about/article7795997.ece Video uploaded by himself: Proof of Concept - Hacking Windows 10 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmpcceM0eV0

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SwisterTwister&oldid=688817811"