Freedom of religion in China: Difference between revisions
m clean up; http→https for selected domains using AWB |
Rescuing 4 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v1.2.7.1) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Proselytizing is only permitted in private settings or within registered houses of worship. Proselytization in public, in unregistered churches or temples, or by foreigners is prohibited.<ref name=IRFR2010/> Members of the officially atheist [[Communist Party of China|Communist Party]] are strongly discouraged from holding religious faith.<ref>Xinhua News Agency, [http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90785/7681240.html 'CPC members shall not believe in religion: senior official'], 19 Dec 2011.</ref> |
Proselytizing is only permitted in private settings or within registered houses of worship. Proselytization in public, in unregistered churches or temples, or by foreigners is prohibited.<ref name=IRFR2010/> Members of the officially atheist [[Communist Party of China|Communist Party]] are strongly discouraged from holding religious faith.<ref>Xinhua News Agency, [http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90785/7681240.html 'CPC members shall not believe in religion: senior official'], 19 Dec 2011.</ref> |
||
A significant number of non-sanctioned churches and temples exist, attended by locals and foreigners alike. Unregistered or underground churches are not officially banned, but are not permitted to openly conduct religious services. These bodies may face varying degrees of interference, harassment, and persecution by state and party organs. In some instances, unregistered religious believers and leaders have been charged with "illegal religious activities" or "disrupting social stability."<ref name=IRFR2010/> Religious believers have also been charged under article 300 of the criminal code, which forbids using heretical organizations to "undermine the implementation of the law."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/ASA17/011/2000/en/7a361a8e-df70-11dd-acaa-7d9091d4638f/asa170112000en.html |title=China: The crackdown on Falun Gong and other so-called 'heretical organizations'|date=23 March 2000|publisher=Amnesty International|accessdate=17 March 2010}}</ref> An extrajudicial, Communist Party-led security organ called the [[6-10 Office]] oversees the suppression of Falun Gong and, increasingly, other unregistered religious organizations.<ref name=Jamestown>Sarah Cook and Leeshai Lemish, [http://www.jamestown.org/programs/chinabrief/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=38411&cHash=2dff246d80ffd78112de97e280ce9725 ‘The 610 Office:Policing the Chinese Spirit’], China Brief , Volume 11 Issue 17 (9 November 2011).</ref><ref name=CECC2009>Congressional-Executive Commission on China, [http://www.cecc.gov/pages/annualRpt/annualRpt09/CECCannRpt2009.pdf ‘Annual Report 2009’], 10 October 2009</ref> |
A significant number of non-sanctioned churches and temples exist, attended by locals and foreigners alike. Unregistered or underground churches are not officially banned, but are not permitted to openly conduct religious services. These bodies may face varying degrees of interference, harassment, and persecution by state and party organs. In some instances, unregistered religious believers and leaders have been charged with "illegal religious activities" or "disrupting social stability."<ref name=IRFR2010/> Religious believers have also been charged under article 300 of the criminal code, which forbids using heretical organizations to "undermine the implementation of the law."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/ASA17/011/2000/en/7a361a8e-df70-11dd-acaa-7d9091d4638f/asa170112000en.html |title=China: The crackdown on Falun Gong and other so-called 'heretical organizations'|date=23 March 2000|publisher=Amnesty International|accessdate=17 March 2010}}</ref> An extrajudicial, Communist Party-led security organ called the [[6-10 Office]] oversees the suppression of Falun Gong and, increasingly, other unregistered religious organizations.<ref name=Jamestown>Sarah Cook and Leeshai Lemish, [http://www.jamestown.org/programs/chinabrief/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=38411&cHash=2dff246d80ffd78112de97e280ce9725 ‘The 610 Office:Policing the Chinese Spirit’], China Brief , Volume 11 Issue 17 (9 November 2011).</ref><ref name=CECC2009>Congressional-Executive Commission on China, [http://www.cecc.gov/pages/annualRpt/annualRpt09/CECCannRpt2009.pdf ‘Annual Report 2009’] {{wayback|url=http://www.cecc.gov/pages/annualRpt/annualRpt09/CECCannRpt2009.pdf |date=20091103235417 }}, 10 October 2009</ref> |
||
Folk religions, though not officially protected, are sometimes tolerated by authorities. The State Administration for Religious Affairs has created a department to oversee the management of folk religion.<ref>United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, [http://www.uscirf.gov/images/book%20with%20cover%20for%20web.pdf Annual Report 2011], May 2011.</ref> |
Folk religions, though not officially protected, are sometimes tolerated by authorities. The State Administration for Religious Affairs has created a department to oversee the management of folk religion.<ref>United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, [http://www.uscirf.gov/images/book%20with%20cover%20for%20web.pdf Annual Report 2011], May 2011.</ref> |
||
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
Uyghur views vary by the oasis they live in. China has historically favored Turpan and Hami. Uyghurs in Turfan and Hami and their leaders like Emin Khoja allied with the Qing against Uyghurs in [[Altishahr]]. During the Qing dynasty, China enfeoffed the rulers of Turpan and Hami (Kumul) as autonomous princes, while the rest of the Uyghurs in Altishahr (the Tarim Basin) were ruled by Begs.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=MT2D_0_eBPQC&pg=PA31#v=onepage&q&f=false Rudelson & Rudelson 1997], p. 31.</ref> Uyghurs from Turpan and Hami were appointed by China as officials to rule over Uyghurs in the Tarim Basin. Turpan is more economically prosperous and views China more positively than the rebellious Kashgar, which is the most anti-China oasis. Uyghurs in Turpan are treated leniently and favourably by China with regards to religious policies, while Kashgar is subjected to controls by the government.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=MT2D_0_eBPQC&pg=PA46#v=onepage&q&f=false Rudelson & Rudelson 1997], pp. 46-7.</ref><ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=cQppAAAAMAAJ&q=Turpan+liberalization+religious&dq=Turpan+liberalization+religious&hl=en&sa=X&ei=NifdU7nqMdPfsATz7ICQBQ&ved=0CCkQ6AEwAg ''Central Asia Monitor'' 1993], p. 19.</ref> In Turpan and Hami, religion is viewed more positively by China than religion in Kashgar and Khotan in southern Xinjiang.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=3EWAAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA118#v=onepage&q&f=false Mackerras 2003], p. 118.</ref> Both Uyghur and Han Communist officials in Turpan turn a blind eye to the law and allow religious Islamic education for Uyghur children.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=jTVjWTllOGgC&pg=PA202#v=onepage&q&f=false Svanberg & Westerlund 2012], p. 202.</ref><ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=MT2D_0_eBPQC&pg=PA81#v=onepage&q&f=false Rudelson & Rudelson 1997], p. 81.</ref> Celebrating at religious functions and going on Hajj to Mecca is encouraged by the Chinese government, for Uyghur members of the Communist party. From 1979-1989, 350 mosques were built in Turpan.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=MT2D_0_eBPQC&pg=PA129#v=onepage&q&f=false Rudelson & Rudelson 1997], p. 129.</ref> Han, Hui, and the Chinese government are viewed much more positively by Uyghurs specifically in Turpan, with the government providing better economic, religious, and political treatment for them.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=jTVjWTllOGgC&pg=PA205#v=onepage&q&f=false Svanberg & Westerlund 2012], p. 205.</ref> |
Uyghur views vary by the oasis they live in. China has historically favored Turpan and Hami. Uyghurs in Turfan and Hami and their leaders like Emin Khoja allied with the Qing against Uyghurs in [[Altishahr]]. During the Qing dynasty, China enfeoffed the rulers of Turpan and Hami (Kumul) as autonomous princes, while the rest of the Uyghurs in Altishahr (the Tarim Basin) were ruled by Begs.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=MT2D_0_eBPQC&pg=PA31#v=onepage&q&f=false Rudelson & Rudelson 1997], p. 31.</ref> Uyghurs from Turpan and Hami were appointed by China as officials to rule over Uyghurs in the Tarim Basin. Turpan is more economically prosperous and views China more positively than the rebellious Kashgar, which is the most anti-China oasis. Uyghurs in Turpan are treated leniently and favourably by China with regards to religious policies, while Kashgar is subjected to controls by the government.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=MT2D_0_eBPQC&pg=PA46#v=onepage&q&f=false Rudelson & Rudelson 1997], pp. 46-7.</ref><ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=cQppAAAAMAAJ&q=Turpan+liberalization+religious&dq=Turpan+liberalization+religious&hl=en&sa=X&ei=NifdU7nqMdPfsATz7ICQBQ&ved=0CCkQ6AEwAg ''Central Asia Monitor'' 1993], p. 19.</ref> In Turpan and Hami, religion is viewed more positively by China than religion in Kashgar and Khotan in southern Xinjiang.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=3EWAAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA118#v=onepage&q&f=false Mackerras 2003], p. 118.</ref> Both Uyghur and Han Communist officials in Turpan turn a blind eye to the law and allow religious Islamic education for Uyghur children.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=jTVjWTllOGgC&pg=PA202#v=onepage&q&f=false Svanberg & Westerlund 2012], p. 202.</ref><ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=MT2D_0_eBPQC&pg=PA81#v=onepage&q&f=false Rudelson & Rudelson 1997], p. 81.</ref> Celebrating at religious functions and going on Hajj to Mecca is encouraged by the Chinese government, for Uyghur members of the Communist party. From 1979-1989, 350 mosques were built in Turpan.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=MT2D_0_eBPQC&pg=PA129#v=onepage&q&f=false Rudelson & Rudelson 1997], p. 129.</ref> Han, Hui, and the Chinese government are viewed much more positively by Uyghurs specifically in Turpan, with the government providing better economic, religious, and political treatment for them.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=jTVjWTllOGgC&pg=PA205#v=onepage&q&f=false Svanberg & Westerlund 2012], p. 205.</ref> |
||
The Uyghur terrorist organization [[East Turkestan Islamic Movement]]'s magazine ''Islamic Turkistan'' has accused the Chinese "Muslim Brotherhood" (the [[Yihewani]]) of being responsible for the moderation of Hui Muslims and the lack of Hui joining terrorist jihadist groups in addition to blaming other things for the lack of Hui Jihadists, such as the fact that for more than 300 years Hui and Uyghurs have been enemies of each other, no separatist Islamist organizations among the Hui, the fact that the Hui view China as their home, and the fact that the "infidel Chinese" language is the language of the Hui.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Zenn |first=Jacob |last2= |first2= |date=March 17, 2011 <!-- 05:10 PM --> |title=Jihad in China? Marketing the Turkistan Islamic Party |url=http://www.jamestown.org/single/?tx_ttnews[tt_news]=37662&no_cache=1#.Vf3TiJdGQrc |journal=Terrorism Monitor |publisher=The Jamestown Foundation |volume=9|issue=11 |pages= |doi= |access-date=18 September 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |
The Uyghur terrorist organization [[East Turkestan Islamic Movement]]'s magazine ''Islamic Turkistan'' has accused the Chinese "Muslim Brotherhood" (the [[Yihewani]]) of being responsible for the moderation of Hui Muslims and the lack of Hui joining terrorist jihadist groups in addition to blaming other things for the lack of Hui Jihadists, such as the fact that for more than 300 years Hui and Uyghurs have been enemies of each other, no separatist Islamist organizations among the Hui, the fact that the Hui view China as their home, and the fact that the "infidel Chinese" language is the language of the Hui.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Zenn |first=Jacob |last2= |first2= |date=March 17, 2011 <!-- 05:10 PM --> |title=Jihad in China? Marketing the Turkistan Islamic Party |url=http://www.jamestown.org/single/?tx_ttnews[tt_news]=37662&no_cache=1#.Vf3TiJdGQrc |journal=Terrorism Monitor |publisher=The Jamestown Foundation |volume=9|issue=11 |pages= |doi= |access-date=18 September 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Zenn |first=Jacob |last2= |first2= |date=February 2013 |title=Terrorism and Islamic Radicalization in Central Asia A Compendium of Recent Jamestown Analysis |url=http://www.jamestown.org/uploads/media/Jamestown_articles_-_Terrorism_in_Central_Asia_February_2013.pdf |journal= |publisher= |volume= |issue= |page=57 |doi= |access-date=18 September 2015 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304050950/http://www.jamestown.org/uploads/media/Jamestown_articles_-_Terrorism_in_Central_Asia_February_2013.pdf |archivedate=4 March 2016 |df= }}</ref> |
||
===Tibetan-Muslim sectarian violence=== |
===Tibetan-Muslim sectarian violence=== |
||
Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
Following a period of meteoric growth of [[Falun Gong]] in the 1990s, the Communist Party launched a campaign to "eradicate" Falun Gong on 20 July 1999. The suppression is characterised by multifaceted propaganda campaign, a program of enforced ideological conversion and re-education, and a variety of extralegal coercive measures such as arbitrary arrests, [[forced labor]], and physical [[torture]], sometimes resulting in death.<ref name="Amnesty1">{{Cite web|url=https://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/ASA17/011/2000/en |title=China: The crackdown on Falun Gong and other so-called "heretical organizations"|date=23 March 2000|publisher=Amnesty International|accessdate=17 March 2010}}</ref> |
Following a period of meteoric growth of [[Falun Gong]] in the 1990s, the Communist Party launched a campaign to "eradicate" Falun Gong on 20 July 1999. The suppression is characterised by multifaceted propaganda campaign, a program of enforced ideological conversion and re-education, and a variety of extralegal coercive measures such as arbitrary arrests, [[forced labor]], and physical [[torture]], sometimes resulting in death.<ref name="Amnesty1">{{Cite web|url=https://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/ASA17/011/2000/en |title=China: The crackdown on Falun Gong and other so-called "heretical organizations"|date=23 March 2000|publisher=Amnesty International|accessdate=17 March 2010}}</ref> |
||
An extra-constitutional body called the [[6-10 Office]] was created to lead the suppression of Falun Gong.<ref name=CECC2008>Congressional-Executive Commission on China (31 October 2008) [http://www.cecc.gov/publications/annual-reports/2008-annual-report ‘Annual Report 2008’] Retrieved 24 December 2013.</ref> The authorities mobilized the state media apparatus, judiciary, police, army, the education system, families and workplaces against the group.<ref name=wildgrass>{{cite book|last=Johnson|first=Ian|title=Wild Grass: Three Portraits of Change in Modern China|year=2005|publisher=Vintage|location=New York, NY|isbn=0375719199|asin=0375719199}}</ref> The campaign is driven by large-scale propaganda through television, newspaper, radio and internet.<ref name=Leung>Leung, Beatrice (2002) 'China and Falun Gong: Party and society relations in the modern era', Journal of Contemporary China, 11:33, 761 – 784</ref> There are reports of systematic torture,<ref name=heretical>(23 March 2000) [ |
An extra-constitutional body called the [[6-10 Office]] was created to lead the suppression of Falun Gong.<ref name=CECC2008>Congressional-Executive Commission on China (31 October 2008) [http://www.cecc.gov/publications/annual-reports/2008-annual-report ‘Annual Report 2008’] Retrieved 24 December 2013.</ref> The authorities mobilized the state media apparatus, judiciary, police, army, the education system, families and workplaces against the group.<ref name=wildgrass>{{cite book|last=Johnson|first=Ian|title=Wild Grass: Three Portraits of Change in Modern China|year=2005|publisher=Vintage|location=New York, NY|isbn=0375719199|asin=0375719199}}</ref> The campaign is driven by large-scale propaganda through television, newspaper, radio and internet.<ref name=Leung>Leung, Beatrice (2002) 'China and Falun Gong: Party and society relations in the modern era', Journal of Contemporary China, 11:33, 761 – 784</ref> There are reports of systematic torture,<ref name=heretical>(23 March 2000) [https://web.archive.org/web/20030711022606/http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/engASA170112000 The crackdown on Falun Gong and other so-called ''heretical organizations''], Amnesty International</ref><ref name=breaking>{{cite news|author=Philip Pan and John Pomfret|title=Torture is Breaking Falun Gong|newspaper= Washington Post|date= 5 August 2001| url=http://faluninfo.net/article/566/ | accessdate=10 April 2012 }}</ref> illegal imprisonment, forced labor, [[Persecution of Falun Gong#Organ harvesting|organ harvesting]]<ref name=orgharv>[[David Kilgour]], [[David Matas]] (6 July 2006, revised 31 January 2007) [http://organharvestinvestigation.net An Independent Investigation into Allegations of Organ Harvesting of Falun Gong Practitioners in China] (free in 22 languages) organharvestinvestigation.net</ref> and abusive psychiatric measures, with the apparent aim of forcing practitioners to recant their belief in Falun Gong.<ref>Mickey Spiegel (2002) [http://hrw.org/reports/2002/china "Dangerous Meditation: China's Campaign Against Falungong"] Human Rights Watch</ref> |
||
Foreign observers estimate that hundreds of thousands and perhaps millions of Falun Gong practitioners have been detained in "re-education through labor" camps, prisons and other detention facilities for refusing to renounce the spiritual practice.<ref name=CECC2008/><ref name=Departmentof>U.S. Department of State, [http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2009/eap/135989.htm 2009 Country Report on Human Rights: China (includes Hong Kong and Macau)]</ref> Former prisoners have reported that Falun Gong practitioners consistently received "the longest sentences and worst treatment" in labor camps, and in some facilities Falun Gong practitioners formed the substantial majority of detainees.<ref name=HumanRights>Human Rights Watch [https://www.hrw.org/reports/2005/china1205/6.htm V. Abuses Against Petitioners in Beijing] of report [https://www.hrw.org/reports/2005/china1205/ "We Could Disappear at Any Time"] December 2005</ref><ref>Leeshai Lemish, [http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2008/10/07/leeshai-lemish-the-games-are-over-the-persecution-continues.aspx "The Games are Over, the Persecution Continues"], National Post 7 October 2008</ref> As of 2009 at least 2,000 Falun Gong adherents had been tortured to death in the persecution campaign,<ref>Andrew Jacobs. [http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/28/world/asia/28china.html 'China Still Presses Crusade Against Falun Gong'], New York Times, 27 April 2009.</ref> with some observers putting the number much higher.<ref name=Jay>[[Jay Nordlinger]] (25 August 2014) [http://www.nationalreview.com/sites/default/files/nordlinger_gutmann08-25-14.html "Face The Slaughter: The Slaughter: Mass Killings, Organ Harvesting, and China’s Secret Solution to Its Dissident Problem, by Ethan Gutmann"], National Review</ref> |
Foreign observers estimate that hundreds of thousands and perhaps millions of Falun Gong practitioners have been detained in "re-education through labor" camps, prisons and other detention facilities for refusing to renounce the spiritual practice.<ref name=CECC2008/><ref name=Departmentof>U.S. Department of State, [http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2009/eap/135989.htm 2009 Country Report on Human Rights: China (includes Hong Kong and Macau)]</ref> Former prisoners have reported that Falun Gong practitioners consistently received "the longest sentences and worst treatment" in labor camps, and in some facilities Falun Gong practitioners formed the substantial majority of detainees.<ref name=HumanRights>Human Rights Watch [https://www.hrw.org/reports/2005/china1205/6.htm V. Abuses Against Petitioners in Beijing] of report [https://www.hrw.org/reports/2005/china1205/ "We Could Disappear at Any Time"] December 2005</ref><ref>Leeshai Lemish, [http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2008/10/07/leeshai-lemish-the-games-are-over-the-persecution-continues.aspx "The Games are Over, the Persecution Continues"], National Post 7 October 2008</ref> As of 2009 at least 2,000 Falun Gong adherents had been tortured to death in the persecution campaign,<ref>Andrew Jacobs. [http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/28/world/asia/28china.html 'China Still Presses Crusade Against Falun Gong'], New York Times, 27 April 2009.</ref> with some observers putting the number much higher.<ref name=Jay>[[Jay Nordlinger]] (25 August 2014) [http://www.nationalreview.com/sites/default/files/nordlinger_gutmann08-25-14.html "Face The Slaughter: The Slaughter: Mass Killings, Organ Harvesting, and China’s Secret Solution to Its Dissident Problem, by Ethan Gutmann"], National Review</ref> |
||
Line 117: | Line 117: | ||
===Organ harvesting allegation=== |
===Organ harvesting allegation=== |
||
{{Main|Organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners in China}} |
{{Main|Organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners in China}} |
||
In 2006 allegations emerged that the vital organs of non-consenting Falun Gong practitioners had been used to supply China's organ tourism industry.<ref name=orgharv/><ref>[[Ethan Gutmann]] (24 November 2008) [http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/824qbcjr.asp "China’s Gruesome Organ Harvest"] The Weekly Standard</ref> The [[Kilgour-Matas report]]<ref name=orgharv/><ref name=theage060708>Reuters, AP (8 July 2006) [http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/falun-gong-organ-claim-supported/2006/07/07/1152240489760.html "Falun Gong organ claim supported"], ''The Age'', (Australia)</ref><ref name=Ottawa>Endemann, Kirstin (6 July 2006) CanWest News Service; ''Ottawa Citizen'' [http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=290fed94-d0c2-4265-8686-54ce75d08eca&k=34245 "Ottawa urged to stop Canadians travelling to China for transplants"]</ref> stated in 2006, "We believe that there has been and continues today to be large scale organ seizures from unwilling Falun Gong practitioners".<ref name="orgharv"/> [[Ethan Gutmann]] interviewed over 100 witnesses and alleged that about 65,000 Falun Gong prisoners were killed for their organs from 2000 to 2008.<ref name="Jay"/><ref>Viv Young (11 August 2014) [http://www.nyjournalofbooks.com/book-review/slaughter-mass-killings-organ-harvesting "The Slaughter: Mass Killings, Organ Harvesting, and China’s Secret Solution to Its Dissident Problem"] New York Journal of Books</ref><ref name=Slaughter>Ethan Gutmann (August 2014) [http://www.amazon.com/The-Slaughter-Killings-Harvesting-Dissident/dp/161614940X The Slaughter: Mass Killings, Organ Harvesting and China’s Secret Solution to Its Dissident Problem] "Average number of Falun Gong in Laogai System at any given time" Low estimate 450,000, High estimate 1,000,000 p 320. "Best estimate of Falun Gong harvested 2000 to 2008" 65,000 p 322. amazon.com</ref><ref>Barbara Turnbull (21 October 2014) [http://www.thestar.com/life/2014/10/21/qa_author_and_analyst_ethan_gutmann_discusses_chinas_illegal_organ_trade.html Q&A: Author and analyst Ethan Gutmann discusses China’s illegal organ trade] The Toronto Star</ref> In 2008, two United Nations Special Rapporteurs reiterated their requests for "the Chinese government to fully explain the allegation of taking vital organs from Falun Gong practitioners".<ref>[http://www.theinformationdaily.com/2008/05/09/united-nations-human-rights-special-rapporteurs-reiterate-findings-on-chinas-organ-harvesting-from-falun-gong-practitioners "United Nations Human Rights Special Rapporteurs Reiterate Findings on China's Organ Harvesting from Falun Gong Practitioners"], The Information Daily.com, 9 May 2008</ref> The Chinese government has denied the allegation. |
In 2006 allegations emerged that the vital organs of non-consenting Falun Gong practitioners had been used to supply China's organ tourism industry.<ref name=orgharv/><ref>[[Ethan Gutmann]] (24 November 2008) [http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/824qbcjr.asp "China’s Gruesome Organ Harvest"] The Weekly Standard</ref> The [[Kilgour-Matas report]]<ref name=orgharv/><ref name=theage060708>Reuters, AP (8 July 2006) [http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/falun-gong-organ-claim-supported/2006/07/07/1152240489760.html "Falun Gong organ claim supported"], ''The Age'', (Australia)</ref><ref name=Ottawa>Endemann, Kirstin (6 July 2006) CanWest News Service; ''Ottawa Citizen'' [http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=290fed94-d0c2-4265-8686-54ce75d08eca&k=34245 "Ottawa urged to stop Canadians travelling to China for transplants"]</ref> stated in 2006, "We believe that there has been and continues today to be large scale organ seizures from unwilling Falun Gong practitioners".<ref name="orgharv"/> [[Ethan Gutmann]] interviewed over 100 witnesses and alleged that about 65,000 Falun Gong prisoners were killed for their organs from 2000 to 2008.<ref name="Jay"/><ref>Viv Young (11 August 2014) [http://www.nyjournalofbooks.com/book-review/slaughter-mass-killings-organ-harvesting "The Slaughter: Mass Killings, Organ Harvesting, and China’s Secret Solution to Its Dissident Problem"] New York Journal of Books</ref><ref name=Slaughter>Ethan Gutmann (August 2014) [http://www.amazon.com/The-Slaughter-Killings-Harvesting-Dissident/dp/161614940X The Slaughter: Mass Killings, Organ Harvesting and China’s Secret Solution to Its Dissident Problem] "Average number of Falun Gong in Laogai System at any given time" Low estimate 450,000, High estimate 1,000,000 p 320. "Best estimate of Falun Gong harvested 2000 to 2008" 65,000 p 322. amazon.com</ref><ref>Barbara Turnbull (21 October 2014) [http://www.thestar.com/life/2014/10/21/qa_author_and_analyst_ethan_gutmann_discusses_chinas_illegal_organ_trade.html Q&A: Author and analyst Ethan Gutmann discusses China’s illegal organ trade] The Toronto Star</ref> In 2008, two United Nations Special Rapporteurs reiterated their requests for "the Chinese government to fully explain the allegation of taking vital organs from Falun Gong practitioners".<ref>[http://www.theinformationdaily.com/2008/05/09/united-nations-human-rights-special-rapporteurs-reiterate-findings-on-chinas-organ-harvesting-from-falun-gong-practitioners "United Nations Human Rights Special Rapporteurs Reiterate Findings on China's Organ Harvesting from Falun Gong Practitioners"] {{wayback|url=http://www.theinformationdaily.com/2008/05/09/united-nations-human-rights-special-rapporteurs-reiterate-findings-on-chinas-organ-harvesting-from-falun-gong-practitioners |date=20150512183828 }}, The Information Daily.com, 9 May 2008</ref> The Chinese government has denied the allegation. |
||
== References == |
== References == |
Revision as of 10:30, 5 January 2017
Freedom of religion in China is provided for in the Constitution of the People's Republic of China,[1] with an important caveat: the government protects what it calls "normal religious activity," defined in practice as activities that take place within government-sanctioned religious organizations and registered places of worship. Although the dynastic governments of imperial China also claimed responsibility for the practice of religion, human rights bodies such as United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) have criticized this differentiation as falling short of international standards for the protection of religious freedom.[2]
China's five officially sanctioned religious organizations are the Buddhist Association of China, Chinese Taoist Association, Islamic Association of China, Three-Self Patriotic Movement and Chinese Patriotic Catholic Association. These groups are afforded a degree of protection, but are subject to restrictions and controls under the State Administration for Religious Affairs. Unregistered religious groups—including house churches, Falun Gong, Tibetan Buddhists, underground Catholics, and Uyghur Muslims—face varying degrees of harassment, including imprisonment, torture, and forced religious conversion.[2] Tam and Hasmath argue that the Chinese government views religion as potentially destabilizing.[3]
Legal framework
The article 36 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China of 1982 specify that:
Citizens of the People's Republic of China enjoy freedom of religious belief. No state organ, public organization or individual may compel citizens to believe in, or not to believe in, any religion; nor may they discriminate against citizens who believe in, or do not believe in, any religion. The state protects normal religious activities. No one may make use of religion to engage in activities that disrupt public order, impair the health of citizens or interfere with the educational system of the state. Religious bodies and religious affairs are not subject to any foreign domination.[4]
This protection is extended only to what is called "normal religious activities," generally understood to refer to religions that submit to state control via the State Administration for Religious Affairs.[5] The Constitution further forbids the use of religion to "engage in activities that disrupt social order, impair the health of citizens or interfere with the educational system of the state. Religious organizations and religious affairs are not subject to any foreign dominance.”[1]
The law affords protection to five officially sanctioned religions: the Buddhist Association of China, Chinese Taoist Association, Islamic Association of China, Three-Self Patriotic Movement and Chinese Patriotic Catholic Association. Religious groups are required to register with the State Administration for Religious Affairs (SARA, formerly known as the central Religious Affairs Bureau) or its provincial and local offices (still known as Religious Affairs Bureaus (RABs)). SARA and the RABs are responsible for monitoring and judging the legitimacy of religious activity.
Proselytizing is only permitted in private settings or within registered houses of worship. Proselytization in public, in unregistered churches or temples, or by foreigners is prohibited.[5] Members of the officially atheist Communist Party are strongly discouraged from holding religious faith.[6]
A significant number of non-sanctioned churches and temples exist, attended by locals and foreigners alike. Unregistered or underground churches are not officially banned, but are not permitted to openly conduct religious services. These bodies may face varying degrees of interference, harassment, and persecution by state and party organs. In some instances, unregistered religious believers and leaders have been charged with "illegal religious activities" or "disrupting social stability."[5] Religious believers have also been charged under article 300 of the criminal code, which forbids using heretical organizations to "undermine the implementation of the law."[7] An extrajudicial, Communist Party-led security organ called the 6-10 Office oversees the suppression of Falun Gong and, increasingly, other unregistered religious organizations.[8][9]
Folk religions, though not officially protected, are sometimes tolerated by authorities. The State Administration for Religious Affairs has created a department to oversee the management of folk religion.[10]
Christianity
Christianity has had a presence in China dating as far back as the Tang dynasty, and accumulated a following in China with the arrival of large numbers of missionaries during the Qing dynasty. Missionaries were expelled from China in 1949 when the Communist Party came to power, and the religion was associated with Western imperialism. However, Christianity experienced a resurgence of popularity since the reforms under Deng Xiaoping in the late 1970s and 1980s. By 2011, approximately 60 million Chinese citizens were estimated to be practicing Protestantism or Catholicism. The majority of these do not belong to the state-sanctioned churches.[11]
Religious practices are still often tightly controlled by government authorities. Chinese children in Mainland China are permitted to be involved with officially sanctioned Christian meetings through the Three-Self Patriotic Movement or the Chinese Catholic Patriotic Associations.
Roman Catholicism
China is home to an estimated 12 million Catholics, the majority of whom worship outside the official Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association (CPA). The State Administration for Religious Affairs states that there are 5.3 million Catholics belonging to the official Catholic Patriotic Association, which oversees 70 bishops, and approximately 6,000 churches nationwide.[5] In addition, there are roughly 40 bishops unordained by the CPA who operate unofficially, and recognize the authority of the Vatican.[5]
The state-sanctioned church appoints its own bishops, and as with all official religious, exercises control over the doctrine and leadership of the religion.[2] As a matter of maintaining autonomy and rejecting foreign intervention, the official church has no official contact with the Vatican, and does not recognize its authority. However, the CPA has allowed for unofficial Vatican approval of ordinations. Although the CPA continues to carry out ordinations opposed by the Holy See, the majority of CPA bishops are now recognized by both authorities.[11] In addition to overseeing the practice of the Catholic faith, the CPA espouses politically oriented objectives as well. Liu Bainian, chairman of the CPA and the Bishops Conference of the Catholic Church in China, stated in a 2011 interview that the church needed individuals who "love the country and love religion: politically, they should respect the Constitution, respect the law, and fervently love the socialist motherland.’’[2]
Some Catholics who recognize the authority of the Holy See choose to worship clandestinely due to the risk of harassment from authorities. Several underground Catholic bishops have been reported disappeared or imprisoned, and harassment of unregistered bishops and priests is common.[5] There are reports of Catholic bishops and priests being forced by authorities to attend the ordination ceremonies for bishops who had not gained Vatican approval.[2] Chinese authorities also have reportedly pressured Catholics to break communion with the Vatican by requiring them to renounce an essential belief in Roman Catholicism, the primacy of the Roman Pontiff. In other instances, however, authorities have permitted Vatican-loyal churches to carry out operations.[5]
Protestantism
The Three-Self Patriotic Movement, National Committee of the Three-Self Patriotic Movement of the Protestant Churches in China; the Three-Self Church or "TSPM" is the government-sanctioned ("patriotic") Christian organization in China. Known in combination with the China Christian Council as the lianghui, they form the only state-sanctioned ("registered") Protestant church in mainland China. All other Protestant denominations are illegal.
Chinese house churches are a religious movement of unregistered assemblies of Christians in China, which operate independently of the government-run Three-Self Patriotic Movement (TSPM) and China Christian Council (CCC) for Protestant groups and the Chinese Patriotic Catholic Association (CCPA) and the Chinese Catholic Bishops Council (CCBC) for Catholics. They are also known as the "Underground" Church or the "Unofficial" Church, although this is somewhat of a misnomer as they are collections of unrelated individual churches rather than a single unified church. They are called "house churches" because as they are not officially registered organizations, they cannot independently own property and hence they meet in private houses, often in secret for fear of arrest or imprisonment.[12]
Buddhism
Tibetan Buddhism
China took full control of Tibet in 1959. In the wake of the takeover and especially during the cultural revolution many monasteries were destroyed and many monks and laypeople killed. The 14th Dalai Lama fled to India and has since ceded temporal power to an elected government-in-exile. The current Dalai Lama has attempted to negotiate with the Chinese authorities for greater autonomy and religious freedom for Tibet. As various high-ranking Lamas in the country have died, the authorities have proposed their own candidates on the religious authorities, which has led at times to rival claimants to the same position. In an effort to control this, the Chinese government passed a law in 2007 requiring a Reincarnation Application be completed and approved for all lamas wishing to reincarnate.[13]
The present incarnation of the Panchen Lama is disputed. The Dalai Lama recognises Gedhun Choekyi Nyima; however, the Chinese government recognises Gyaincain Norbu as the incarnation of the 11th Panchen Lama.[14] Exile Tibetan sources allege that Gedhun Choekyi Nyima was kidnapped by the Chinese government.[15] The identity of the Panchen Lama is of critical importance[citation needed] to Tibetan Buddhism because he is one of the authorities that must approve the next Dalai Lama.
Taoism
Taoist practitioners are required to register with the state-controlled Chinese Taoist Association (CTA), which exercises control over religious doctrine and personnel.[2] Local governments restrict the construction of Taoist temples and statues, and call for abandonment of practices they deem to be "superstitious" or "feudal." The CTA dictates the proper interpretation of Taoist doctrine, and exhorts Taoist practitioners to support the Communist Party and the state. For example, a Taoist scripture reading class held by the CTA in November 2010 required participants to ‘‘fervently love the socialist motherland [and] uphold the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party.’’[2]
Islam
The State Administration for Religious Affairs places the number of Muslims in China at approximately 21 million, while independent estimates suggest the number could be upwards of 50 million.[5] According to a 2000 census, 96 percent of 20.3 million reported Muslims belong to three ethnic groups: Hui, Uyghur, and Kazakh. Most Hui Muslims live in Ningxia, Qinghai, and Gansu provinces, while Uyghur Muslims are found predominantly in the Xinjiang.[5]
The state-run Islamic Association of China (IAC) oversees the practice of Islam, though many Muslims worship outside the state system. The IAC regulates the content of sermons and interpretation of religious scripture, exercises control over the confirmation of religious leaders, and monitors overseas pilgrimages. In 2001, the IAC established a committee to ensure that scriptures were interpreted in a manner to serve the interests of the Chinese government and Communist Party.[2]
Authorities in Xinjiang impose rigid controls over religious expression, particularly over Uyghurs. Human rights reports indicate that crackdowns on religion are frequently integrated into security campaigns.[2] Authorities monitor mosques, restrict the observation of Ramadan by government officials and students, and enact campaigns to prevent Uyghur men from wearing beards.[2] Uyghur Muslims worshiping independently have been detained and charged with conducting "illegal religious activities."[5]
However, the suppression of the Uyghurs has more to do with the fact that they are separatist, rather than Muslim. China banned a book titled "Xing Fengsu" ("Sexual Customs") which insulted Islam and placed its authors under arrest in 1989 after protests in Lanzhou and Beijing by Chinese Hui Muslims, during which the Chinese police provided protection to the Hui Muslim protestors, and the Chinese government organized public burnings of the book.[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] The Chinese government assisted them and gave into their demands because Hui do not have a separatist movement, unlike the Uyghurs,[26] Hui Muslim protestors who violently rioted by vandalizing property during the protests against the book were let off by the Chinese government and went unpunished while Uyghur protestors were imprisoned.[27]
In 2007, anticipating the coming "Year of the Pig" in the Chinese calendar, depictions of pigs were banned from CCTV "to avoid conflicts with ethnic minorities".[28] This is believed to refer to China's population of 20 million Muslims (to whom pigs are considered "unclean").
In response to the 2015 Charlie Hebdo shooting Chinese state-run media attacked Charlie Hebdo for publishing the cartoons insulting Muhammad, with the state-run Xinhua advocated limiting freedom of speech, while another state-run newspaper Global Times said the attack was "payback" for what it characterised as Western colonialism and accusing Charlie Hebdo of trying to incite a clash of civilizations.[29][30]
Different Muslim ethnic groups in different regions are treated differently by the Chinese government in regards to religious freedom. Religious freedom is present for Hui Muslims, who can practice their religion, build Mosques, and have their children attend Mosques, while more controls are placed specifically on Uyghurs in Xinjiang.[31] Since the 1980s Islamic private schools have been supported and permitted by the Chinese government among Muslim areas, only specifically excluding Xinjiang from allowing these schools because of separatist sentiment there.[32]
Although religious education for children is officially forbidden by law in China, the Communist party allows Hui Muslims to violate this law and have their children educated in religion and attend Mosques while the law is enforced on Uyghurs. After secondary education is completed, China then allows Hui students who are willing to embark on religious studies under an Imam.[33] China does not enforce the law against children attending Mosques on non-Uyghurs in areas outside of Xinjiang.[34][35]
Hui Muslims who are employed by the state are allowed to fast during Ramadan unlike Uyghurs in the same positions, the amount of Hui going on Hajj is expanding, and Hui women are allowed to wear veils, while Uyghur women are discouraged from wearing them.[36]
Hui religious schools are allowed a massive autonomous network of mosques and schools run by a Hui Sufi leader was formed with the approval of the Chinese government even as he admitted to attending an event where Bin Laden spoke.[37][38]
"The Diplomat" reported on the fact that while Uyghur's religious activities are curtailed, Hui Muslims are granted widespread religious freedom and that therefore the policy of the Chinese government towards Uyghurs in Xinjiang is not directed against Islam, but rather aggressively stamping out the Uyghur separatist threat.[39]
Uyghur views vary by the oasis they live in. China has historically favored Turpan and Hami. Uyghurs in Turfan and Hami and their leaders like Emin Khoja allied with the Qing against Uyghurs in Altishahr. During the Qing dynasty, China enfeoffed the rulers of Turpan and Hami (Kumul) as autonomous princes, while the rest of the Uyghurs in Altishahr (the Tarim Basin) were ruled by Begs.[40] Uyghurs from Turpan and Hami were appointed by China as officials to rule over Uyghurs in the Tarim Basin. Turpan is more economically prosperous and views China more positively than the rebellious Kashgar, which is the most anti-China oasis. Uyghurs in Turpan are treated leniently and favourably by China with regards to religious policies, while Kashgar is subjected to controls by the government.[41][42] In Turpan and Hami, religion is viewed more positively by China than religion in Kashgar and Khotan in southern Xinjiang.[43] Both Uyghur and Han Communist officials in Turpan turn a blind eye to the law and allow religious Islamic education for Uyghur children.[44][45] Celebrating at religious functions and going on Hajj to Mecca is encouraged by the Chinese government, for Uyghur members of the Communist party. From 1979-1989, 350 mosques were built in Turpan.[46] Han, Hui, and the Chinese government are viewed much more positively by Uyghurs specifically in Turpan, with the government providing better economic, religious, and political treatment for them.[47]
The Uyghur terrorist organization East Turkestan Islamic Movement's magazine Islamic Turkistan has accused the Chinese "Muslim Brotherhood" (the Yihewani) of being responsible for the moderation of Hui Muslims and the lack of Hui joining terrorist jihadist groups in addition to blaming other things for the lack of Hui Jihadists, such as the fact that for more than 300 years Hui and Uyghurs have been enemies of each other, no separatist Islamist organizations among the Hui, the fact that the Hui view China as their home, and the fact that the "infidel Chinese" language is the language of the Hui.[48][49]
Tibetan-Muslim sectarian violence
In Tibet, the majority of Muslims are Hui people. Hatred between Tibeans and Muslims stems from events during the Muslim warlord Ma Bufang's rule in Qinghai such as Ngolok rebellions (1917–49) and the Sino-Tibetan War, but in 1949 the Communists put an end to the violence between Tibetans and Muslims, however, new Tibetan-Muslim violence broke out after China engaged in liberalization. Riots broke out between Muslims and Tibetans over incidents such as bones in soups and prices of balloons, and Tibetans accused Muslims of being cannibals who cooked humans in their soup and of contaminating food with urine. Tibetans attacked Muslim restaurants. Fires set by Tibetans which burned the apartments and shops of Muslims resulted in Muslim families being killed and wounded in the 2008 mid-March riots. Due to Tibetan violence against Muslims, the traditional Islamic white caps have not been worn by many Muslims. Scarfs were removed and replaced with hairnets by Muslim women in order to hide. Muslims prayed in secret at home when in August 2008 the Tibetans burned the Mosque. Incidents such as these which make Tibetans look bad on the international stage are covered up by the Tibetan exile community. The repression of Tibetan separatism by the Chinese government is supported by Hui Muslims.[50] In addition, Chinese-speaking Hui have problems with Tibetan Hui (the Tibetan speaking Kache minority of Muslims).[51]
The main Mosque in Lhasa was burned down by Tibetans and Chinese Hui Muslims were violently assaulted by Tibetan rioters in the 2008 Tibetan unrest.[52] Tibetan exiles and foreign scholars like ignore and do not talk about sectarian violence between Tibetan Buddhists and Muslims.[53] The majority of Tibetans viewed the wars against Iraq and Afghanistan after 9/11 positively and it had the effect of galvanizing anti-Muslim attitudes among Tibetans and resulted in an anti-Muslim boycott against Muslim owned businesses.[54] Tibetan Buddhists propagate a false libel that Muslims cremate their Imams and use the ashes to convert Tibetans to Islam by making Tibetans inhale the ashes, even though the Tibetans seem to be aware that Muslims practice burial and not cremation since they frequently clash against proposed Muslim cemeteries in their area.[55]
Since the Chinese government supports and backs up the Hui Muslims, the Tibetans deliberately attack the Hui Muslims as a way to demonstrate anti-government sentiment and because they have a background of sectarian violence against each other since Ma Bufang's rule due to their separate religions and ethnicity and Tibetans resent Hui economic domination.[56]
In 1936, after Sheng Shicai expelled 30,000 Kazakhs from Xinjiang to Qinghai, Hui led by General Ma Bufang massacred their fellow Muslim Kazakhs, until there were 135 of them left.[57]
From Northern Xinjiang over 7,000 Kazakhs fled to the Tibetan-Qinghai plateau region via Gansu and were wreaking massive havoc so Ma Bufang solved the problem by relegating the Kazakhs into designated pastureland in Qinghai, but Hui, Tibetans, and Kazakhs in the region continued to clash against each other.[58]
Tibetans attacked and fought against the Kazakhs as they entered Tibet via Gansu and Qinghai.
In northern Tibet Kazakhs clashed with Tibetan soldiers and then the Kazakhs were sent to Ladakh.[59]
Tibetan troops robbed and killed Kazakhs 400 miles east of Lhasa at Chamdo when the Kazakhs were entering Tibet.[60][61]
In 1934, 1935, 1936-1938 from Qumil Eliqsan led the Kerey Kazakhs to migrate to Gansu and the amount was estimated at 18,000, and they entered Gansu and Qinghai.[62]
Tibetan troops serving under the Dalai Lama murdered the American CIA agent Douglas Mackiernan and his two White Russian helpers because he was dressed as a Kazakh, their enemy.
Falun Gong
Following a period of meteoric growth of Falun Gong in the 1990s, the Communist Party launched a campaign to "eradicate" Falun Gong on 20 July 1999. The suppression is characterised by multifaceted propaganda campaign, a program of enforced ideological conversion and re-education, and a variety of extralegal coercive measures such as arbitrary arrests, forced labor, and physical torture, sometimes resulting in death.[64]
An extra-constitutional body called the 6-10 Office was created to lead the suppression of Falun Gong.[65] The authorities mobilized the state media apparatus, judiciary, police, army, the education system, families and workplaces against the group.[66] The campaign is driven by large-scale propaganda through television, newspaper, radio and internet.[67] There are reports of systematic torture,[68][69] illegal imprisonment, forced labor, organ harvesting[70] and abusive psychiatric measures, with the apparent aim of forcing practitioners to recant their belief in Falun Gong.[71]
Foreign observers estimate that hundreds of thousands and perhaps millions of Falun Gong practitioners have been detained in "re-education through labor" camps, prisons and other detention facilities for refusing to renounce the spiritual practice.[65][72] Former prisoners have reported that Falun Gong practitioners consistently received "the longest sentences and worst treatment" in labor camps, and in some facilities Falun Gong practitioners formed the substantial majority of detainees.[73][74] As of 2009 at least 2,000 Falun Gong adherents had been tortured to death in the persecution campaign,[75] with some observers putting the number much higher.[76]
Some international observers and judicial authorities have described the campaign against Falun Gong as a genocide.[77][78] In 2009, courts in Spain and Argentina indicted senior Chinese officials for genocide and crimes against humanity for their role in orchestrating the suppression of Falun Gong.[79][80][81]
Organ harvesting allegation
In 2006 allegations emerged that the vital organs of non-consenting Falun Gong practitioners had been used to supply China's organ tourism industry.[70][82] The Kilgour-Matas report[70][83][84] stated in 2006, "We believe that there has been and continues today to be large scale organ seizures from unwilling Falun Gong practitioners".[70] Ethan Gutmann interviewed over 100 witnesses and alleged that about 65,000 Falun Gong prisoners were killed for their organs from 2000 to 2008.[76][85][86][87] In 2008, two United Nations Special Rapporteurs reiterated their requests for "the Chinese government to fully explain the allegation of taking vital organs from Falun Gong practitioners".[88] The Chinese government has denied the allegation.
References
- ^ a b Constitution of China, Chapter 2, Article 36.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Congressional-Executive Commission on China, Annual Report 2011, Oct 2011.
- ^ Tam, Jonathan; Hasmath, Reza (2015). "Navigating Uncertainty: The Survival Strategies of Religious NGOs in China". Journal of Civil Society. 11 (3): 283–299. doi:10.1080/17448689.2015.1061261. ISSN 1744-8689.
- ^ English translation of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China of 1982 (page visited on 20 February 2015).
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j U.S Department of State, International Religious Freedom Report 2010: China, 17 Nov 2010.
- ^ Xinhua News Agency, 'CPC members shall not believe in religion: senior official', 19 Dec 2011.
- ^ "China: The crackdown on Falun Gong and other so-called 'heretical organizations'". Amnesty International. 23 March 2000. Retrieved 17 March 2010.
- ^ Sarah Cook and Leeshai Lemish, ‘The 610 Office:Policing the Chinese Spirit’, China Brief , Volume 11 Issue 17 (9 November 2011).
- ^ Congressional-Executive Commission on China, ‘Annual Report 2009’ Archived 2009-11-03 at the Wayback Machine, 10 October 2009
- ^ United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, Annual Report 2011, May 2011.
- ^ a b Tim Gardam, Christians in China: Is the country in spiritual crisis? BBC, 11 Sept 2011.
- ^ Schafferer, Christian (2005). Understanding modern East Asian politics. ISBN 1-59454-505-7.
- ^ "Reincarnation of living Buddha needs gov't approval". China Daily. 4 August 2007. Retrieved 2007-08-09.
- ^ China Tibet Information Center The 11th Panchen
- ^ BBC news, Tibet's Missing Spiritual Guide, May 6, 2005
- ^ Beijing Review, Volume 32 1989, p. 13.
- ^ Gladney 1991, p. 2.
- ^ Schein 2000, p. 154.
- ^ Gladney 2004, p. 66.
- ^ Bulag 2010, p. 104.
- ^ Gladney 2005, p. 257.
- ^ Gladney 2013, p. 144.
- ^ Sautman 2000, p. 79.
- ^ Gladney 1996, p. 341.
- ^ Lipman 1996, p. 299.
- ^ Harold Miles Tanner (2009). China: a history. Hackett Publishing. p. 581. ISBN 0-87220-915-6. Retrieved 2010-06-28.
- ^ Gladney 2004, p. 232.
- ^ Lim, Louisa (6 February 2007). "Ban Thwarts 'Year of the Pig' Ads in China". National Public Radio.
- ^ "Charlie Hebdo Attack Shows Need for Press Limits, Xinhua Says". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 14 January 2015.
- ^ "Beijing jumps onto Paris attack to feed state propaganda machine". Japan Times. Retrieved 14 January 2015.
- ^ Senate (U S ) Committee on Foreign Relations (2005). State Dept (U S ) (ed.). Annual Report on International Religious Freedom, 2004. Compiled by State Dept (U S ) (illustrated ed.). Government Printing Office. pp. 159–60. ISBN 0160725526. Retrieved 24 April 2014.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help); horizontal tab character in|others=
at position 12 (help) - ^ Kees Versteegh; Mushira Eid (2005). Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics: A-Ed. Brill. pp. 383–. ISBN 978-90-04-14473-6.
The People's Republic, founded in 1949, banned private confessional teaching from the early 1950s to the 1980s, until a more liberal stance allowed religious mosque education to resume and private Muslim schools to open. Moreoever, except in Xinjiang for fear of secessionist feelings, the government allowed and sometimes encouraged the founding of private Muslim schools in order to provide education for people who could not attend increasingly expensive state schools or who left them early, for lack of money or lack of satisfactory achievements.
- ^ ALLÈS & CHÉRIF-CHEBBI & HALFON 2003, p. 14.
- ^ Senate (U S ) Committee on Foreign Relations (2005). State Dept (U S ) (ed.). Annual Report on International Religious Freedom, 2004. Compiled by State Dept (U S ) (illustrated ed.). Government Printing Office. p. 160. ISBN 0160725526. Retrieved 24 April 2014.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help); horizontal tab character in|others=
at position 12 (help) - ^ Szadziewski, Henryk. "Religious Repression of Uyghurs in East Turkestan". Venn Institute. Retrieved 26 June 2015.
- ^ Beech, Hannah (Aug 12, 2014). "If China Is Anti-Islam, Why Are These Chinese Muslims Enjoying a Faith Revival?". TIME magazine. Retrieved 25 June 2015.
- ^ Bovingdon, Gardner (2013). The Uyghurs: Strangers in Their Own Land (illustrated ed.). Columbia University Press. ISBN 0231519419. Retrieved 24 April 2014.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - ^ Savadove, Bill. 2005. "Faith Flourishes in an Arid Wasteland; Muslim Sect in Ningxia Accepts Beijing's Authority and Is Allowed to Build a Virtual Religious State." South China Morning Post, August 17.
- ^ Crane, Brent. 2014. "A Tale of Two Chinese Muslim Minorities"The Diplomat, August 22.
- ^ Rudelson & Rudelson 1997, p. 31.
- ^ Rudelson & Rudelson 1997, pp. 46-7.
- ^ Central Asia Monitor 1993, p. 19.
- ^ Mackerras 2003, p. 118.
- ^ Svanberg & Westerlund 2012, p. 202.
- ^ Rudelson & Rudelson 1997, p. 81.
- ^ Rudelson & Rudelson 1997, p. 129.
- ^ Svanberg & Westerlund 2012, p. 205.
- ^ Zenn, Jacob (March 17, 2011). "Jihad in China? Marketing the Turkistan Islamic Party". Terrorism Monitor. 9 (11). The Jamestown Foundation. Retrieved 18 September 2015.
- ^ Zenn, Jacob (February 2013). "Terrorism and Islamic Radicalization in Central Asia A Compendium of Recent Jamestown Analysis" (PDF): 57. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 18 September 2015.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help); Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help); horizontal tab character in|title=
at position 48 (help) - ^ Demick, Barbara (23 June 2008). "Tibetan-Muslim tensions roil China". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on June 22, 2010. Retrieved 2010-06-28.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ Mayaram, Shail (2009). The other global city. Taylor Francis US. p. 75. ISBN 0-415-99194-3. Retrieved 2010-07-30.
- ^ "Police shut Muslim quarter in Lhasa". CNN. LHASA, Tibet. 28 March 2008. Archived from the original on April 4, 2008.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ Fischer (2005), pp. 1–2
- ^ Fischer (2005), p. 17
- ^ Fischer (2005), p. 19
- ^ A.A. (Nov 11, 2012). "The living picture of frustration". The Economist.
- ^ American Academy of Political and Social Science (1951). The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Volume 277. American Academy of Political and Social Science. p. 152. Retrieved 2012-09-29.
A group of Kazakhs, originally numbering over 20000 people when expelled from Sinkiang by Sheng Shih-ts'ai in 1936, was reduced, after repeated massacres by their Chinese coreligionists under Ma Pu-fang, to a scattered 135 people.
- ^ Lin (2011), pp. 112–
- ^ Lin (2011), pp. 231–
- ^ Blackwood's Magazine. William Blackwood. 1948. p. 407.
- ^ http://www.academia.edu/4534001/STUDIES_IN_THE_POLITICS_HISTORY_AND_CULTURE_OF_TURKIC_PEOPLES page 192
- ^ Linda Benson (1988). The Kazaks of China: Essays on an Ethnic Minority. Ubsaliensis S. Academiae. p. 195. ISBN 978-91-554-2255-4.
- ^ http://www.amnesty.de/umleitung/2006/deu03/031?lang=de%26mimetype%3dtext%2fhtml
- ^ "China: The crackdown on Falun Gong and other so-called "heretical organizations"". Amnesty International. 23 March 2000. Retrieved 17 March 2010.
- ^ a b Congressional-Executive Commission on China (31 October 2008) ‘Annual Report 2008’ Retrieved 24 December 2013.
- ^ Johnson, Ian (2005). Wild Grass: Three Portraits of Change in Modern China. New York, NY: Vintage. ASIN 0375719199. ISBN 0375719199.
{{cite book}}
: Check|asin=
value (help) - ^ Leung, Beatrice (2002) 'China and Falun Gong: Party and society relations in the modern era', Journal of Contemporary China, 11:33, 761 – 784
- ^ (23 March 2000) The crackdown on Falun Gong and other so-called heretical organizations, Amnesty International
- ^ Philip Pan and John Pomfret (5 August 2001). "Torture is Breaking Falun Gong". Washington Post. Retrieved 10 April 2012.
- ^ a b c d David Kilgour, David Matas (6 July 2006, revised 31 January 2007) An Independent Investigation into Allegations of Organ Harvesting of Falun Gong Practitioners in China (free in 22 languages) organharvestinvestigation.net
- ^ Mickey Spiegel (2002) "Dangerous Meditation: China's Campaign Against Falungong" Human Rights Watch
- ^ U.S. Department of State, 2009 Country Report on Human Rights: China (includes Hong Kong and Macau)
- ^ Human Rights Watch V. Abuses Against Petitioners in Beijing of report "We Could Disappear at Any Time" December 2005
- ^ Leeshai Lemish, "The Games are Over, the Persecution Continues", National Post 7 October 2008
- ^ Andrew Jacobs. 'China Still Presses Crusade Against Falun Gong', New York Times, 27 April 2009.
- ^ a b Jay Nordlinger (25 August 2014) "Face The Slaughter: The Slaughter: Mass Killings, Organ Harvesting, and China’s Secret Solution to Its Dissident Problem, by Ethan Gutmann", National Review
- ^ Samuel Totten and Paul Robert Bartrop Dictionary of Genocide. (Greewood publishing group: 2008), p 69
- ^ The Standard. 'Rights lawyers look to UN over plight of Falun Gong', 21 Sept 2005.
- ^ Reuters, "Argentine judge asks China arrests over Falun Gong", 22 Dec 2009.
- ^ Genocide Prevention Network, 'Spanish Court Indicts Chinese Leaders for Persecution of Falun Gong'.
- ^ La Audiencia pide interrogar al ex presidente chino Jiang por genocidio, Nov 14, 2009
- ^ Ethan Gutmann (24 November 2008) "China’s Gruesome Organ Harvest" The Weekly Standard
- ^ Reuters, AP (8 July 2006) "Falun Gong organ claim supported", The Age, (Australia)
- ^ Endemann, Kirstin (6 July 2006) CanWest News Service; Ottawa Citizen "Ottawa urged to stop Canadians travelling to China for transplants"
- ^ Viv Young (11 August 2014) "The Slaughter: Mass Killings, Organ Harvesting, and China’s Secret Solution to Its Dissident Problem" New York Journal of Books
- ^ Ethan Gutmann (August 2014) The Slaughter: Mass Killings, Organ Harvesting and China’s Secret Solution to Its Dissident Problem "Average number of Falun Gong in Laogai System at any given time" Low estimate 450,000, High estimate 1,000,000 p 320. "Best estimate of Falun Gong harvested 2000 to 2008" 65,000 p 322. amazon.com
- ^ Barbara Turnbull (21 October 2014) Q&A: Author and analyst Ethan Gutmann discusses China’s illegal organ trade The Toronto Star
- ^ "United Nations Human Rights Special Rapporteurs Reiterate Findings on China's Organ Harvesting from Falun Gong Practitioners" Archived 2015-05-12 at the Wayback Machine, The Information Daily.com, 9 May 2008
External links
- "International Religious Freedom Report 2010 - PRC". U.S. Department of State. Retrieved 2010-12-01.
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|month=
(help)