Jump to content

John Edwards extramarital affair: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
reworded end of sentence with better terminology
Rescuing 4 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v1.3beta8)
Line 26: Line 26:
The ''Enquirer'' published a follow-up story that included a photograph of a visibly [[pregnant]] Hunter on December 19, 2007. The ''Enquirer'' alleged that, according to its anonymous source, Hunter was claiming that Edwards was the father of her child. The article also claimed that Hunter had relocated to a [[gated community]] in [[Chapel Hill, North Carolina]], near Andrew Young, a former official with the Edwards campaign, who had claimed paternity of Hunter's child. As with Hunter's initial denial of the affair, Young's paternity claim had been issued to Armstrong and published on MyDD.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/12/19/153027/87 |title=Is this really happening? |author=[[Jerome Armstrong|Armstrong, Jerome]] |date=December 19, 2007 |work=[[MyDD]] |archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/5Zvb84CP3?url=http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/12/19/153027/87 |archivedate=August 8, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=National Enquirer Enters The 2008 Presidential Race With Edwards Love-Child Story |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/12/19/national-enquirerem_n_77603.html |work=[[The Huffington Post]] |date=December 19, 2007 |first=Danny |last=Shea}}</ref>
The ''Enquirer'' published a follow-up story that included a photograph of a visibly [[pregnant]] Hunter on December 19, 2007. The ''Enquirer'' alleged that, according to its anonymous source, Hunter was claiming that Edwards was the father of her child. The article also claimed that Hunter had relocated to a [[gated community]] in [[Chapel Hill, North Carolina]], near Andrew Young, a former official with the Edwards campaign, who had claimed paternity of Hunter's child. As with Hunter's initial denial of the affair, Young's paternity claim had been issued to Armstrong and published on MyDD.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/12/19/153027/87 |title=Is this really happening? |author=[[Jerome Armstrong|Armstrong, Jerome]] |date=December 19, 2007 |work=[[MyDD]] |archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/5Zvb84CP3?url=http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/12/19/153027/87 |archivedate=August 8, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=National Enquirer Enters The 2008 Presidential Race With Edwards Love-Child Story |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/12/19/national-enquirerem_n_77603.html |work=[[The Huffington Post]] |date=December 19, 2007 |first=Danny |last=Shea}}</ref>


[[CBS News]] journalist, [[Bob Schieffer]], asked about the allegations on ''[[Imus in the Morning]]'', stating, "I believe that's a story that we will be avoiding, because it appears to me that there's absolutely nothing to it ... This seems to be just sort of a staple of modern campaigns, that you got through at least one love child, which turns out not to be a love child. And I think we can all do better than this one."<ref>{{cite interview|last=Schieffer |first=Bob |subjectlink=Bob Schieffer |interviewer=[[Don Imus]] |title= |url=http://mediamatters.org/items/200712190010?f=h_latest |work=[[Imus in the Morning]] |publisher=[[American Broadcasting Company|ABC]] |date=December 19, 2007 |deadurl=unfit |archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/5ZvdaZz78?url=http://mediamatters.org/items/200712190010?f%3Dh_latest |archivedate=August 8, 2008 }}</ref> [[Mickey Kaus]], a journalist at ''[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]]'', speculated that the lack of mainstream coverage was motivated by a desire not to harm Elizabeth Edwards, who was fighting [[cancer]] at the time. Kaus also considered the possibility of news organizations taking a "wait-and-see" attitude, pending the results of the [[Iowa Democratic caucuses, 2008|Iowa caucuses]].<ref>{{cite news |first1=Mickey |last1=Kaus |title=Undernews Underanalysis |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2181118/#undernewsanalysis |work=[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]] |date=December 26, 2007}}</ref>
[[CBS News]] journalist, [[Bob Schieffer]], asked about the allegations on ''[[Imus in the Morning]]'', stating, "I believe that's a story that we will be avoiding, because it appears to me that there's absolutely nothing to it ... This seems to be just sort of a staple of modern campaigns, that you got through at least one love child, which turns out not to be a love child. And I think we can all do better than this one."<ref>{{cite interview|last=Schieffer |first=Bob |subjectlink=Bob Schieffer |interviewer=[[Don Imus]] |title= |url=http://mediamatters.org/items/200712190010?f=h_latest |work=[[Imus in the Morning]] |publisher=[[American Broadcasting Company|ABC]] |date=December 19, 2007 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/5ZvdaZz78?url=http://mediamatters.org/items/200712190010?f=h_latest |archivedate=August 8, 2008 |df= }}</ref> [[Mickey Kaus]], a journalist at ''[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]]'', speculated that the lack of mainstream coverage was motivated by a desire not to harm Elizabeth Edwards, who was fighting [[cancer]] at the time. Kaus also considered the possibility of news organizations taking a "wait-and-see" attitude, pending the results of the [[Iowa Democratic caucuses, 2008|Iowa caucuses]].<ref>{{cite news |first1=Mickey |last1=Kaus |title=Undernews Underanalysis |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2181118/#undernewsanalysis |work=[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]] |date=December 26, 2007}}</ref>


==Hotel encounter with reporters==
==Hotel encounter with reporters==
Line 41: Line 41:


===Coverage of the allegations===
===Coverage of the allegations===
Aside from the Fox News story on July 25, mainstream news sources did not immediately report the story. Articles describing the ''Enquirer'' allegations were eventually published by the magazines, ''[[New York (magazine)|New York]]''<ref>{{cite news |title=‘National Enquirer’ Still Chasing John Edwards–Affair Story; Claim to Have Caught Him in Hotel Tryst |url=http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/07/national_enquirer_still_chasin.html |work=[[New York (magazine)|New York]] |date= July 22, 2008 }}</ref> and ''[[Radar (magazine)|Radar]]''.<ref name=Radar29Jul/><ref>{{cite news |first=Walker |last=Boyd |title=Edwards' Mistress Dishes on Sleeping with Powerful Rich Men, Sort of |url=http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2008/07/edwards-mistress-dishes-on-sleeping-with-powerful-rich-men-s.php |work=[[Radar (magazine)|Radar]] |date=July 29, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Neel |last=Shah |title=John Edwards' Money Man: Fellow Tar Heel Eric Montross? |url=http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2008/07/john-edwards-money-man-fellow-tar-heeleric-montross.php |work=[[Radar (magazine)|Radar]] |date=July 31, 2008 }}</ref> The claims were also mentioned in opinion columns and in-house blogs of several other papers.<ref name=York>{{cite news |first=Byron |last=York |authorlink=Byron York |title=The Democratic ticket and the John Edwards affair |url=http://thehill.com/byron-york/the-democratic-ticket-and-the-john-edwards-affair-2008-07-23.html |work=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]] |date=July 23, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Jon |last=Fine |title=John Edwards, The National Enquirer, And The Mainstream Press |url=http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/FineOnMedia/archives/2008/07/the_national_en.html |work=Fine on Media |publisher=''[[Business Week]]'' |date=July 23, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Edwards scandal: Silence, please |url=http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/national/article736867.ece |work=[[Tampa Bay Times]] |date=July 24, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Jim |last=Morrill |title= Did Edwards' VP chances take tabloid hit? |url=http://campaigntracker.blogspot.com/2008/07/did-edwards-vp-chances-take-tabloid-hit.html |work=[[The Charlotte Observer]] |date=July 24, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Howard |last=Gensler |title=Tattle: 'Enquirer' links John Edwards, Rielle Hunter |url=http://www.philly.com/philly/entertainment/20080725_Tattle___Enquirer__links_John_Edwards__Rielle_Hunter.html |work=[[Philadelphia Inquirer]] |date=July 25, 2008 |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20080729235938/http://www.philly.com/philly/entertainment/20080725_Tattle___Enquirer__links_John_Edwards__Rielle_Hunter.html <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archivedate = July 29, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Gregg |last=Herrington |title= VP guessing game is heating up |url=http://www.columbian.com/opinion/news/2008/07/07252008_VP-guessing-game-is-heating-up.cfm |work=[[The Columbian]] |date=July 25, 2008 |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20080731101707/http://www.columbian.com/opinion/news/2008/07/07252008_VP-guessing-game-is-heating-up.cfm <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archivedate = July 31, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Kevin |last=Rennie |title=A Star Turn For Elizabeth Edwards |url=http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/editorials/hc-rennie0727.artjul27,0,2804558.column |work=[[The Hartford Courant]] |date=July 27, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Phil |last=Valentine |authorlink=Phil Valentine |title=Media decisions over gossip vs. news get tangled in politics |url=http://www.tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080727/COLUMNIST0130/807270379/1008/OPINION01 |work=[[The Tennessean]] |date=July 27, 2008 }} {{Dead link|date=October 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref> On July 23, [[Glenn Beck]] talked about the story on his [[Glenn Beck (TV program)|program]], [[Headline News]], recommending that Edwards sue the ''Enquirer'' if its story was proven false.<ref>{{cite news |first=Glenn |last=Beck |title=Transcripts of July 23, 2008 show |url=http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0807/23/gb.01.html |work=[[CNN]] |date=July 23, 2008 }}</ref> On that same day, [[Roxanne Roberts]], a style writer for ''The Washington Post'', said, "We have no evidence this is true. Lots of juicy details—enough so Edwards may feel he has to address the issue, especially if it's not true and there's an innocent explanation. Or not. That won't stop anyone from talking about it, but let's assume, until we know the facts, that this could be false."<ref>{{cite news |first1=Roxanne |last1=Roberts |title=The Reliable Source |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2008/07/21/DI2008072101782.html |work=[[The Washington Post]] |date=July 23, 2008 }}</ref>
Aside from the Fox News story on July 25, mainstream news sources did not immediately report the story. Articles describing the ''Enquirer'' allegations were eventually published by the magazines, ''[[New York (magazine)|New York]]''<ref>{{cite news |title=‘National Enquirer’ Still Chasing John Edwards–Affair Story; Claim to Have Caught Him in Hotel Tryst |url=http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/07/national_enquirer_still_chasin.html |work=[[New York (magazine)|New York]] |date= July 22, 2008 }}</ref> and ''[[Radar (magazine)|Radar]]''.<ref name=Radar29Jul/><ref>{{cite news|first=Walker |last=Boyd |title=Edwards' Mistress Dishes on Sleeping with Powerful Rich Men, Sort of |url=http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2008/07/edwards-mistress-dishes-on-sleeping-with-powerful-rich-men-s.php |work=[[Radar (magazine)|Radar]] |date=July 29, 2008 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080805080126/http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2008/07/edwards-mistress-dishes-on-sleeping-with-powerful-rich-men-s.php |archivedate=August 5, 2008 |df= }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Neel |last=Shah |title=John Edwards' Money Man: Fellow Tar Heel Eric Montross? |url=http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2008/07/john-edwards-money-man-fellow-tar-heeleric-montross.php |work=[[Radar (magazine)|Radar]] |date=July 31, 2008 }}</ref> The claims were also mentioned in opinion columns and in-house blogs of several other papers.<ref name=York>{{cite news |first=Byron |last=York |authorlink=Byron York |title=The Democratic ticket and the John Edwards affair |url=http://thehill.com/byron-york/the-democratic-ticket-and-the-john-edwards-affair-2008-07-23.html |work=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]] |date=July 23, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Jon |last=Fine |title=John Edwards, The National Enquirer, And The Mainstream Press |url=http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/FineOnMedia/archives/2008/07/the_national_en.html |work=Fine on Media |publisher=''[[Business Week]]'' |date=July 23, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Edwards scandal: Silence, please |url=http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/national/article736867.ece |work=[[Tampa Bay Times]] |date=July 24, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Jim |last=Morrill |title= Did Edwards' VP chances take tabloid hit? |url=http://campaigntracker.blogspot.com/2008/07/did-edwards-vp-chances-take-tabloid-hit.html |work=[[The Charlotte Observer]] |date=July 24, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Howard |last=Gensler |title=Tattle: 'Enquirer' links John Edwards, Rielle Hunter |url=http://www.philly.com/philly/entertainment/20080725_Tattle___Enquirer__links_John_Edwards__Rielle_Hunter.html |work=[[Philadelphia Inquirer]] |date=July 25, 2008 |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20080729235938/http://www.philly.com/philly/entertainment/20080725_Tattle___Enquirer__links_John_Edwards__Rielle_Hunter.html <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archivedate = July 29, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Gregg |last=Herrington |title= VP guessing game is heating up |url=http://www.columbian.com/opinion/news/2008/07/07252008_VP-guessing-game-is-heating-up.cfm |work=[[The Columbian]] |date=July 25, 2008 |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20080731101707/http://www.columbian.com/opinion/news/2008/07/07252008_VP-guessing-game-is-heating-up.cfm <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archivedate = July 31, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Kevin |last=Rennie |title=A Star Turn For Elizabeth Edwards |url=http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/editorials/hc-rennie0727.artjul27,0,2804558.column |work=[[The Hartford Courant]] |date=July 27, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Phil |last=Valentine |authorlink=Phil Valentine |title=Media decisions over gossip vs. news get tangled in politics |url=http://www.tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080727/COLUMNIST0130/807270379/1008/OPINION01 |work=[[The Tennessean]] |date=July 27, 2008 }} {{Dead link|date=October 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref> On July 23, [[Glenn Beck]] talked about the story on his [[Glenn Beck (TV program)|program]], [[Headline News]], recommending that Edwards sue the ''Enquirer'' if its story was proven false.<ref>{{cite news |first=Glenn |last=Beck |title=Transcripts of July 23, 2008 show |url=http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0807/23/gb.01.html |work=[[CNN]] |date=July 23, 2008 }}</ref> On that same day, [[Roxanne Roberts]], a style writer for ''The Washington Post'', said, "We have no evidence this is true. Lots of juicy details—enough so Edwards may feel he has to address the issue, especially if it's not true and there's an innocent explanation. Or not. That won't stop anyone from talking about it, but let's assume, until we know the facts, that this could be false."<ref>{{cite news |first1=Roxanne |last1=Roberts |title=The Reliable Source |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2008/07/21/DI2008072101782.html |work=[[The Washington Post]] |date=July 23, 2008 }}</ref>


On July 25, in response to a question as to whether ''The Washington Post'' was investigating the claims, political reporter, Jonathan Weisman, stated, "Yes, and to be quite honest, we're waiting to see the pictures the ''Enquirer'' says it will publish this weekend. That said, Edwards is no longer an elected official and is not running for any office now. Don't expect wall-to-wall coverage."<ref>{{cite news |first=Jonathan |last=Weisman |title=Post Politics Hour |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2008/07/20/DI2008072001482.html |work=[[The Washington Post]] |date=July 25, 2008 }}</ref> Meanwhile, on that same day, Kaus, at ''Slate'', published an e-mail sent to him the day before from Tony Pierce, an editor at the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]''. It was sent to the ''Times''' in-house bloggers, and, referring to the Edwards allegations, stated, "I am asking you all not to blog about this topic until further notified." Kaus portrayed the email as a "[[gag order|gag]]" order.<ref>{{cite news |first=Mickey |last=Kaus |authorlink=Mickey Kaus |title=LAT Gags Blogs |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2195914/#latedict |work=[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]] |date=July 25, 2008 }}</ref> In an online interview, Pierce defended the e-mail, stating that it was the result of a decision by senior editors at the ''Times'' to allow time for the newspaper's Metro Desk to investigate the allegations. Pierce also pointed out that a ''Times'' blogger had already posted a story<ref>{{cite news |first=Amina |last=Khan |title=National Enquirer alleges John Edwards affair; blogosphere readies salt shaker |url=http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla/2008/07/john-edwards-af.html |work=[[Los Angeles Times]] |date=July 23, 2008 }}</ref> on the ''Enquirer'' claims.<ref>{{cite news |first=Simon |last=Owens |title=LA Times blog editor Tony Pierce responds to criticism about National Enquirer story |url=http://bloggasm.com/la-times-blog-editor-tony-pierce-responds-to-criticism-about-national-enquirer-story |work=Bloggasm |date=July 29, 2008 }}</ref>
On July 25, in response to a question as to whether ''The Washington Post'' was investigating the claims, political reporter, Jonathan Weisman, stated, "Yes, and to be quite honest, we're waiting to see the pictures the ''Enquirer'' says it will publish this weekend. That said, Edwards is no longer an elected official and is not running for any office now. Don't expect wall-to-wall coverage."<ref>{{cite news |first=Jonathan |last=Weisman |title=Post Politics Hour |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2008/07/20/DI2008072001482.html |work=[[The Washington Post]] |date=July 25, 2008 }}</ref> Meanwhile, on that same day, Kaus, at ''Slate'', published an e-mail sent to him the day before from Tony Pierce, an editor at the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]''. It was sent to the ''Times''' in-house bloggers, and, referring to the Edwards allegations, stated, "I am asking you all not to blog about this topic until further notified." Kaus portrayed the email as a "[[gag order|gag]]" order.<ref>{{cite news |first=Mickey |last=Kaus |authorlink=Mickey Kaus |title=LAT Gags Blogs |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2195914/#latedict |work=[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]] |date=July 25, 2008 }}</ref> In an online interview, Pierce defended the e-mail, stating that it was the result of a decision by senior editors at the ''Times'' to allow time for the newspaper's Metro Desk to investigate the allegations. Pierce also pointed out that a ''Times'' blogger had already posted a story<ref>{{cite news |first=Amina |last=Khan |title=National Enquirer alleges John Edwards affair; blogosphere readies salt shaker |url=http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla/2008/07/john-edwards-af.html |work=[[Los Angeles Times]] |date=July 23, 2008 }}</ref> on the ''Enquirer'' claims.<ref>{{cite news |first=Simon |last=Owens |title=LA Times blog editor Tony Pierce responds to criticism about National Enquirer story |url=http://bloggasm.com/la-times-blog-editor-tony-pierce-responds-to-criticism-about-national-enquirer-story |work=Bloggasm |date=July 29, 2008 }}</ref>
Line 51: Line 51:
In the American political blogosphere, the story was covered by [[The Drudge Report]], [[Jack Shafer]],<ref name=Shafer23Jul>{{cite news |first=Jack |last=Shafer |authorlink=Jack Shafer |title=Why the Press Is Ignoring the Edwards "Love Child" Story |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2195869/ |work=[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]] |date=July 23, 2007 }}</ref> Kaus<ref>{{cite news |first=Mickey |last=Kaus |authorlink=Mickey Kaus |title=Edwards, Busted |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2195359/#busted |work=[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]] |date=July 23, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Mickey |last=Kaus |authorlink=Mickey Kaus |title=Does Obama Want Edwards Gone? |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2195914/ |work=[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]] |date=July 28, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Mickey |last=Kaus |authorlink=Mickey Kaus |title=NE to MSM--No Pix Fix |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2196224/#photosinperel |work=[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]] |date=July 29, 2008 }}</ref> at ''Slate'', Alex Coppelman at [[Salon.com]],<ref name=Salon25Jul>{{cite news |first=Alex |last=Coppelman |title=The John Edwards "love child" story |url=http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/07/25/edwards/index.html |work=[[Salon.com]] |date=July 25, 2008 }}</ref> [[Rachel Sklar]]<ref name=Sklar30Jul>{{cite news |first=Rachel |last=Sklar |authorlink=Rachel Sklar |title=Why Won't The Media Cover Edwards? Because They Don't Have To Yet. |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/30/why-wont-the-media-cover_n_115295.html |work=[[The Huffington Post]] |date=July 30, 2008 }}</ref> Lee Stranahan;<ref name=Stranahan>{{cite news |first=Lee |last=Stranahan |title=Say It Ain't So, John -- Why Progressives Need To Get Out In Front Of The John Edwards Affair Rumors |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lee-stranahan/say-it-aint-so-john-why-p_b_115165.html |work=[[The Huffington Post]] |date=July 27, 2008 }}</ref> (Stranahan also cross-posted his article to ''[[Daily Kos]]'')<ref>{{cite news |first=Lee |last=Stranahan |title=Say It Ain't So, John. Progressives And The Edwards Affair |url=http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/7/27/2154/80475/731/557612 |work=[[Daily Kos]] |date=July 26, 2008 }}</ref> at ''[[The Huffington Post]]'', independent political pundit, [[James Joyner]],<ref>{{cite news |first=James |last=Joyner |title=John Edwards Love Child Scandal |url=http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/12/john_edwards_love_child_scandal/ |work=Outside the Beltway |date=July 22, 2008 }}</ref> [[Rod Dreher]] at ''[[The Dallas Morning News]]'',<ref>{{cite news |first1=Rod |last1=Dreher |title=LA Times gag on Edwards love child story |url=http://dallasmorningviewsblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2008/07/la-times-gag-on.html |work=[[The Dallas Morning News]] |date=July 25, 2008}}</ref> [[Paul Mulshine]] at ''[[The Star-Ledger]]'',<ref name=Mulshine2Aug>{{cite news |first=Paul |last= Mulshine |title=Bloggers still beating MSM on Edwards story |url=http://blog.nj.com/njv_paul_mulshine/2008/08/bloggers_still_beating_msm_on.html |work=[[The Star-Ledger]] |date=August 2, 2008 }}</ref> and Guy Adams at ''[[The Independent]]''.<ref name=Adams4Aug>{{cite news |first=Guy |last=Adams |title=Guy Adams' US Media Diary: The 'scoop' the US papers ignored |url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/comment/guy-adams-us-media-diary-the-scoop-the-us-papers-ignored-884086.html |work=[[The Independent]] |date=August 4, 2008 | location=London}}</ref>
In the American political blogosphere, the story was covered by [[The Drudge Report]], [[Jack Shafer]],<ref name=Shafer23Jul>{{cite news |first=Jack |last=Shafer |authorlink=Jack Shafer |title=Why the Press Is Ignoring the Edwards "Love Child" Story |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2195869/ |work=[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]] |date=July 23, 2007 }}</ref> Kaus<ref>{{cite news |first=Mickey |last=Kaus |authorlink=Mickey Kaus |title=Edwards, Busted |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2195359/#busted |work=[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]] |date=July 23, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Mickey |last=Kaus |authorlink=Mickey Kaus |title=Does Obama Want Edwards Gone? |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2195914/ |work=[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]] |date=July 28, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Mickey |last=Kaus |authorlink=Mickey Kaus |title=NE to MSM--No Pix Fix |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2196224/#photosinperel |work=[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]] |date=July 29, 2008 }}</ref> at ''Slate'', Alex Coppelman at [[Salon.com]],<ref name=Salon25Jul>{{cite news |first=Alex |last=Coppelman |title=The John Edwards "love child" story |url=http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/07/25/edwards/index.html |work=[[Salon.com]] |date=July 25, 2008 }}</ref> [[Rachel Sklar]]<ref name=Sklar30Jul>{{cite news |first=Rachel |last=Sklar |authorlink=Rachel Sklar |title=Why Won't The Media Cover Edwards? Because They Don't Have To Yet. |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/30/why-wont-the-media-cover_n_115295.html |work=[[The Huffington Post]] |date=July 30, 2008 }}</ref> Lee Stranahan;<ref name=Stranahan>{{cite news |first=Lee |last=Stranahan |title=Say It Ain't So, John -- Why Progressives Need To Get Out In Front Of The John Edwards Affair Rumors |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lee-stranahan/say-it-aint-so-john-why-p_b_115165.html |work=[[The Huffington Post]] |date=July 27, 2008 }}</ref> (Stranahan also cross-posted his article to ''[[Daily Kos]]'')<ref>{{cite news |first=Lee |last=Stranahan |title=Say It Ain't So, John. Progressives And The Edwards Affair |url=http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/7/27/2154/80475/731/557612 |work=[[Daily Kos]] |date=July 26, 2008 }}</ref> at ''[[The Huffington Post]]'', independent political pundit, [[James Joyner]],<ref>{{cite news |first=James |last=Joyner |title=John Edwards Love Child Scandal |url=http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2007/12/john_edwards_love_child_scandal/ |work=Outside the Beltway |date=July 22, 2008 }}</ref> [[Rod Dreher]] at ''[[The Dallas Morning News]]'',<ref>{{cite news |first1=Rod |last1=Dreher |title=LA Times gag on Edwards love child story |url=http://dallasmorningviewsblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2008/07/la-times-gag-on.html |work=[[The Dallas Morning News]] |date=July 25, 2008}}</ref> [[Paul Mulshine]] at ''[[The Star-Ledger]]'',<ref name=Mulshine2Aug>{{cite news |first=Paul |last= Mulshine |title=Bloggers still beating MSM on Edwards story |url=http://blog.nj.com/njv_paul_mulshine/2008/08/bloggers_still_beating_msm_on.html |work=[[The Star-Ledger]] |date=August 2, 2008 }}</ref> and Guy Adams at ''[[The Independent]]''.<ref name=Adams4Aug>{{cite news |first=Guy |last=Adams |title=Guy Adams' US Media Diary: The 'scoop' the US papers ignored |url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/comment/guy-adams-us-media-diary-the-scoop-the-us-papers-ignored-884086.html |work=[[The Independent]] |date=August 4, 2008 | location=London}}</ref>


Some of the coverage alleged mainstream [[media bias]] due to Edwards' Democratic affiliation.<ref name=Adams4Aug/><ref>{{cite news |first=Paul |last=Mulshine |title=Monkey business on the Edwards story? |url=http://www.nj.com/columns/ledger/mulshine/index.ssf?/base/columns-0/121747907040810.xml&coll=1 |work=[[The Star-Ledger]] |date=July 31, 2008 }}</ref> Others voiced contempt for tabloid papers like the ''Enquirer''<ref name=Sklar30Jul/><ref name=Mulshine2Aug/><ref>{{cite news |first=Ryan |last=Tate |title=What John Edwards Scandal? |url=http://gawker.com/5028514/what-john-edwards-scandal |work=[[Gawker.com]] |date=2008-07-24 |deadurl=no |accessdate=February 17, 2014}}</ref><ref name=Estrich/> and compared the coverage to that of [[Larry Craig#2007 arrest and consequences|a scandal]] involving [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] Senator [[Larry Craig]].<ref name=Shafer23Jul/><ref name=Stranahan/> Others claimed that the ''Enquirer'' was reliable in regard to scandal reporting, noting the reporting on the [[Gary Hart presidential campaign 1988|Gary Hart/Donna Rice affair]],<ref name=Salon25Jul/> the [[O. J. Simpson murder case]],<ref name=Mulshine2Aug/> [[Jesse Jackson]]'s out-of-wedlock child,<ref name=Shafer23Jul/> and [[Rush Limbaugh]]'s [[Rush Limbaugh#Prescription drug addiction|prescription drug addiction]].<ref name=Salon25Jul/>
Some of the coverage alleged mainstream [[media bias]] due to Edwards' Democratic affiliation.<ref name=Adams4Aug/><ref>{{cite news |first=Paul |last=Mulshine |title=Monkey business on the Edwards story? |url=http://www.nj.com/columns/ledger/mulshine/index.ssf?/base/columns-0/121747907040810.xml&coll=1 |work=[[The Star-Ledger]] |date=July 31, 2008 }}</ref> Others voiced contempt for tabloid papers like the ''Enquirer''<ref name=Sklar30Jul/><ref name=Mulshine2Aug/><ref>{{cite news|first=Ryan |last=Tate |title=What John Edwards Scandal? |url=http://gawker.com/5028514/what-john-edwards-scandal |work=[[Gawker.com]] |date=2008-07-24 |deadurl=yes |accessdate=February 17, 2014 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140116222224/http://gawker.com/5028514/what-john-edwards-scandal |archivedate=January 16, 2014 |df= }}</ref><ref name=Estrich/> and compared the coverage to that of [[Larry Craig#2007 arrest and consequences|a scandal]] involving [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] Senator [[Larry Craig]].<ref name=Shafer23Jul/><ref name=Stranahan/> Others claimed that the ''Enquirer'' was reliable in regard to scandal reporting, noting the reporting on the [[Gary Hart presidential campaign 1988|Gary Hart/Donna Rice affair]],<ref name=Salon25Jul/> the [[O. J. Simpson murder case]],<ref name=Mulshine2Aug/> [[Jesse Jackson]]'s out-of-wedlock child,<ref name=Shafer23Jul/> and [[Rush Limbaugh]]'s [[Rush Limbaugh#Prescription drug addiction|prescription drug addiction]].<ref name=Salon25Jul/>


Non-coverage was also discussed. Some stated that the non-coverage was motivated by sympathy for Elizabeth Edwards.<ref name=Salon25Jul/><ref name=Sklar30Jul/><ref name=Estrich>{{cite news |first=Susan |last=Estrich |title=Is an Ex-Senator's Alleged Love Child News? |url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/2008/08/01/is-ex-senator-alleged-love-child-news/ |publisher=[[Fox News]] |date=2008-08-01 |deadurl=no |accessdate=February 17, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Marty |last=Kaplan |authorlink=Marty Kaplan |title=On Having Your (Political) Heart Broken |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marty-kaplan/on-having-your-political_b_116059.html |work=[[The Huffington Post]] |date=July 31, 2008 }}</ref> Several prominent sites criticized the omission of information about the allegations, most notably [[Gawker.com]]<ref>{{cite news |last="Pareene" |title=John Edwards' Wikipedia Page Strangely Love Child-Free |url=http://gawker.com/5029921/john-edwards-wikipedia-page-strangely-love-child+free |work=[[Gawker.com]] |date=July 28, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last="Pareene" |title=Meet the Mistress! (Just Not on Wikipedia) |url=http://gawker.com/5030606/meet-the-mistress-just-not-on-wikipedia |work=[[Gawker.com]] |date=July 29, 2008 }}</ref> and [[Roger L. Simon]] of [[Pajamas Media]],<ref>{{cite news |first=Roger L. |last=Simon |authorlink=Roger L. Simon |title=Edwards: Wikipedia engages in some ‘political cleansing’ |url=http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/07/28/edwards-wikipedia-engages-in-some-political-cleansing/ |work=[[Pajamas Media]] |date=July 28, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Roger L. |last=Simon |authorlink=Roger L. Simon |title=Censored John Edwards/Wikipedia love child page revealed |url=http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/08/04/censored-john-edwardswikipedia-love-child-page-revealed/ |publisher=[[Pajamas Media]] |date=August 4, 2008 }}</ref> whose posts were linked by [[Glenn Reynolds]] at the high-traffic weblog, ''[[Instapundit]]''.<ref>{{cite news |first=Glenn |last=Reynolds |title=Political Cleansing at Wikipedia |url=http://www.pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/archives2/022226.php |work=Instapundit|date=July 28, 2008 }}</ref> For instance, as of August 6, cable television news network, [[CNN]], had not mentioned the story, and [[MSNBC]] had mentioned it once. Several pundits stated that Edwards was "fair game" for reporting on the allegations because he had been recently identified<ref>{{cite news |first=Ken |last=Thomas |title=Edwards, Nunn on Obama's Veep List |url=http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,1816620,00.html |agency=Associated Press |publisher=''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'' |date=June 19, 2008 }}</ref> as a potential candidate for vice president or [[United States Attorney General|attorney general]] for Obama,<ref name=Shafer23Jul/><ref name=Sklar30Jul/><ref name=Adams4Aug/> and that Edwards himself had made his marital fidelity an issue in his campaign.<ref name=Sklar30Jul/>
Non-coverage was also discussed. Some stated that the non-coverage was motivated by sympathy for Elizabeth Edwards.<ref name=Salon25Jul/><ref name=Sklar30Jul/><ref name=Estrich>{{cite news |first=Susan |last=Estrich |title=Is an Ex-Senator's Alleged Love Child News? |url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/2008/08/01/is-ex-senator-alleged-love-child-news/ |publisher=[[Fox News]] |date=2008-08-01 |deadurl=no |accessdate=February 17, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Marty |last=Kaplan |authorlink=Marty Kaplan |title=On Having Your (Political) Heart Broken |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marty-kaplan/on-having-your-political_b_116059.html |work=[[The Huffington Post]] |date=July 31, 2008 }}</ref> Several prominent sites criticized the omission of information about the allegations, most notably [[Gawker.com]]<ref>{{cite news |last="Pareene" |title=John Edwards' Wikipedia Page Strangely Love Child-Free |url=http://gawker.com/5029921/john-edwards-wikipedia-page-strangely-love-child+free |work=[[Gawker.com]] |date=July 28, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last="Pareene" |title=Meet the Mistress! (Just Not on Wikipedia) |url=http://gawker.com/5030606/meet-the-mistress-just-not-on-wikipedia |work=[[Gawker.com]] |date=July 29, 2008 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080819024553/http://gawker.com/5030606/meet-the-mistress-just-not-on-wikipedia |archivedate=August 19, 2008 |df= }}</ref> and [[Roger L. Simon]] of [[Pajamas Media]],<ref>{{cite news |first=Roger L. |last=Simon |authorlink=Roger L. Simon |title=Edwards: Wikipedia engages in some ‘political cleansing’ |url=http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/07/28/edwards-wikipedia-engages-in-some-political-cleansing/ |work=[[Pajamas Media]] |date=July 28, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Roger L. |last=Simon |authorlink=Roger L. Simon |title=Censored John Edwards/Wikipedia love child page revealed |url=http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/08/04/censored-john-edwardswikipedia-love-child-page-revealed/ |publisher=[[Pajamas Media]] |date=August 4, 2008 }}</ref> whose posts were linked by [[Glenn Reynolds]] at the high-traffic weblog, ''[[Instapundit]]''.<ref>{{cite news |first=Glenn |last=Reynolds |title=Political Cleansing at Wikipedia |url=http://www.pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/archives2/022226.php |work=Instapundit|date=July 28, 2008 }}</ref> For instance, as of August 6, cable television news network, [[CNN]], had not mentioned the story, and [[MSNBC]] had mentioned it once. Several pundits stated that Edwards was "fair game" for reporting on the allegations because he had been recently identified<ref>{{cite news |first=Ken |last=Thomas |title=Edwards, Nunn on Obama's Veep List |url=http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,1816620,00.html |agency=Associated Press |publisher=''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'' |date=June 19, 2008 }}</ref> as a potential candidate for vice president or [[United States Attorney General|attorney general]] for Obama,<ref name=Shafer23Jul/><ref name=Sklar30Jul/><ref name=Adams4Aug/> and that Edwards himself had made his marital fidelity an issue in his campaign.<ref name=Sklar30Jul/>


Blogosphere claims of a media "blackout" extended to the online reference site, [[Wikipedia]], and its [[John Edwards|biographical article]] on Edwards. The Wikipedia biography was later changed to include a mention of the allegations' potential impact on Edwards' political career. The controversy over the Wikipedia page was covered by ''[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]'' magazine<ref>{{cite news |first=Sarah Lai |last=Stirland |title=Wikipedians Wrestle Over John Edwards Love-Child Rumor |url=http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/07/curious-about-w.html |work=[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]] |date=July 30, 2008 }}</ref> and ''[[Kansas City Star]]'' columnist Aaron Barnhart, who opined the addition of the information to the Wikipedia article influenced later media coverage of the allegations.<ref name=Barnhart>{{cite news |first=Aaron |last=Barnhart |title=The John Edwards love-baby story: What took so long? |url=http://blogs.kansascity.com/tvbarn/2008/07/the-john-edward.html |work=The Kansas City Star |date=July 31, 2008 }}</ref>
Blogosphere claims of a media "blackout" extended to the online reference site, [[Wikipedia]], and its [[John Edwards|biographical article]] on Edwards. The Wikipedia biography was later changed to include a mention of the allegations' potential impact on Edwards' political career. The controversy over the Wikipedia page was covered by ''[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]'' magazine<ref>{{cite news |first=Sarah Lai |last=Stirland |title=Wikipedians Wrestle Over John Edwards Love-Child Rumor |url=http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/07/curious-about-w.html |work=[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]] |date=July 30, 2008 }}</ref> and ''[[Kansas City Star]]'' columnist Aaron Barnhart, who opined the addition of the information to the Wikipedia article influenced later media coverage of the allegations.<ref name=Barnhart>{{cite news |first=Aaron |last=Barnhart |title=The John Edwards love-baby story: What took so long? |url=http://blogs.kansascity.com/tvbarn/2008/07/the-john-edward.html |work=The Kansas City Star |date=July 31, 2008 }}</ref>

Revision as of 15:50, 24 April 2017

Senator John Edwards

John Edwards is a former United States Senator from North Carolina and a Democratic Party vice-presidential and presidential candidate who admitted to an extramarital affair in August 2008. The affair was initially reported in late-2007 by The National Enquirer (a U.S. supermarket tabloid newspaper), but was given little attention outside the tabloid press and political blogosphere.[1][2][3] The Enquirer cited claims from an anonymous source that Edwards had engaged in an affair with Rielle Hunter, a filmmaker hired to work for his presidential campaign, and that Hunter had a child from the relationship. ABC News reported that Andrew Young, a member of Edwards' campaign team, stated that Edwards asked him to "Get a doctor to fake the DNA results ... and to steal a diaper from the baby so he could secretly do a DNA test to find out if this [was] indeed his child."[4]

The allegations were initially published in late-2007 and were denied by both Edwards and Hunter. Young claimed paternity of Hunter's daughter, although no father is listed on the child's birth certificate, and Young has subsequently denied it.

In July 2008, several U.S. mainstream media news outlets cited the allegations in relation to Edwards' future political career, as well as in relation to his chances of being selected as a running mate in Barack Obama's 2008 presidential bid. Then, on August 7, 2008, Edwards admitted to ABC News correspondent, Bob Woodruff, that he did have an extended affair with Hunter, but denied that he was the father of Hunter's baby girl.[5] Hunter's sister claimed that Edwards was the father and publicly asked Edwards to take a paternity test to determine whether the child was his.[6]

On January 21, 2010, Edwards issued a statement admitting that he was the father of Hunter's child.[7] After the admission from Edwards that he fathered a child with Hunter, Edwards' wife, Elizabeth Edwards, announced a separation from her husband, with an intention to file for divorce.[8][9] On January 25, 2010, the existence of an explicit sex tape, featuring Edwards and Hunter, was publicly reported.[10]

When Edwards first admitted to the affair, he stated that Elizabeth was in remission from breast cancer. However, it became clear that the affair was still ongoing, even after he and his wife made a joint announcement that her cancer had returned and was found to be incurable. Elizabeth Edwards died on December 7, 2010.

Rielle Hunter and the Edwards campaign

In December 2006, Newsweek reported that Hunter had been hired by the Edwards campaign to produce a series of webisodes that portrayed behind-the-scenes life on the campaign trail.[11][12][13][14] Hunter had pitched the idea of creating the series to Edwards when she met him at a bar in New York, where the politician was attending a business meeting.[15] The campaign paid Hunter's production company, Midline Groove, over USD$100,000 for the short documentaries[16] that were uploaded to YouTube upon completion. In 2006, Business Week included one of the episodes as a feature in a web video.[17]

The first apparent mention, in print form, of a possible Edwards/Hunter affair, appeared in the New York Post on August 27, 2007. The page-six feature published a blind gossip item[18] that asked: "Which political candidate enjoys visiting New York because he has a girlfriend who lives downtown? The poll tells her he'll marry her when his current wife is out of the picture." The mention in the Post started a tabloid and blogosphere investigation that eventually led to accusations against Hunter and Edwards.[19][20]

In September 2007, Sam Stein, a political reporter for The Huffington Post, reported that the Hunter web documentaries had been removed from the internet and were no longer accessible. Representatives from the Edwards campaign stated that the material could not be used due to campaign finance law.[21][22] Several days later, The Huffington Post reported that the videos had been reposted to YouTube by an anonymous user.[23]

Initial National Enquirer allegations

On October 10, 2007, the Enquirer published an article claiming that Edwards had engaged in an extramarital affair with an unnamed female campaign worker. On the same day, Stein published another article in The Huffington Post that contained additional details about Hunter, including Hunter's name and the web videos that she had produced.[24] The following day, October 11, New York magazine published a piece linking Hunter to the Enquirer allegations.[19]

Both Edwards and Hunter denied the relationship claims. Edwards said the Enquirer story was "made up", further stating, "I've been in love with the same woman for 30-plus years," referring to his wife Elizabeth, "and as anybody who's been around us knows, she's an extraordinary human being, warm, loving, beautiful, sexy and as good a person as I have ever known. So the story's just false."[25][26][27] Hunter's attorney issued a denial via Jerome Armstrong, a political blogger and founder of MyDD, stating, "The innuendos and lies that have appeared on the internet (sic) and in the National Enquirer concerning John Edwards are not true, completely unfounded and ridiculous."[28][29] David Perel, the Editor-in-Chief at the Enquirer, did not back down from the paper's allegations, stating, "The original story was 100% accurate."[30]

The Enquirer published a follow-up story that included a photograph of a visibly pregnant Hunter on December 19, 2007. The Enquirer alleged that, according to its anonymous source, Hunter was claiming that Edwards was the father of her child. The article also claimed that Hunter had relocated to a gated community in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, near Andrew Young, a former official with the Edwards campaign, who had claimed paternity of Hunter's child. As with Hunter's initial denial of the affair, Young's paternity claim had been issued to Armstrong and published on MyDD.[31][32]

CBS News journalist, Bob Schieffer, asked about the allegations on Imus in the Morning, stating, "I believe that's a story that we will be avoiding, because it appears to me that there's absolutely nothing to it ... This seems to be just sort of a staple of modern campaigns, that you got through at least one love child, which turns out not to be a love child. And I think we can all do better than this one."[33] Mickey Kaus, a journalist at Slate, speculated that the lack of mainstream coverage was motivated by a desire not to harm Elizabeth Edwards, who was fighting cancer at the time. Kaus also considered the possibility of news organizations taking a "wait-and-see" attitude, pending the results of the Iowa caucuses.[34]

Hotel encounter with reporters

The Beverly Hilton Hotel, where Edwards encountered the Enquirer reporters

According to Perel, the Enquirer had received information stating that Edwards would be visiting Hunter and her child at the Beverly Hilton Hotel in Beverly Hills, California, on the evening of July 21, 2008, and the paper dispatched several reporters to the hotel. The team of Enquirer reporters encountered Edwards on the hotel premises sometime after 2 a.m. on the morning of July 22. According to Perel, Edwards, who was not a registered guest of the hotel, retreated from the reporters to a washroom, where he remained until being escorted from the premises by hotel security. The encounter between Edwards and the Enquirer reporters was later confirmed by a hotel guard interviewed by Fox News. Edwards' spokespeople did not respond to Fox's request for comment on the incident.[35]

In articles published immediately after the hotel encounter, the Enquirer claimed to be in possession of evidence showing that Edwards had visited Hunter and her child in the Hilton for several hours, including a videotape of Hunter entering the room, where she allegedly met Edwards, and one of Edwards leaving the same room. However, the paper declined a request from Fox News to release photos or videotape of the incident.[35] In an interview with Radar, Perel said that the Enquirer would release the photos when "the time is right."[36] The Enquirer later stated that it had filed a "criminal complaint" against the hotel's security over its conduct during the encounter, but the Beverly Hills Police Department said that there was no criminal complaint and that only an "incident report" was under investigation.[35]

When Edwards was questioned at a New Orleans event on July 23, 2008, he stated, "I have no idea what you're asking about. I've responded, consistently, to these tabloid allegations by saying I don't respond to these lies and you know that ... and I stand by that."[35] On the same day, Hunter appeared on the television program, Extra, describing the Enquirer story as "completely unfounded and ridiculous".[37]

On August 6, 2008, the Enquirer published a blurry photo that allegedly portrayed Edwards holding Hunter's baby.[38]

Media coverage

Coverage of the allegations

Aside from the Fox News story on July 25, mainstream news sources did not immediately report the story. Articles describing the Enquirer allegations were eventually published by the magazines, New York[39] and Radar.[36][40][41] The claims were also mentioned in opinion columns and in-house blogs of several other papers.[22][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] On July 23, Glenn Beck talked about the story on his program, Headline News, recommending that Edwards sue the Enquirer if its story was proven false.[49] On that same day, Roxanne Roberts, a style writer for The Washington Post, said, "We have no evidence this is true. Lots of juicy details—enough so Edwards may feel he has to address the issue, especially if it's not true and there's an innocent explanation. Or not. That won't stop anyone from talking about it, but let's assume, until we know the facts, that this could be false."[50]

On July 25, in response to a question as to whether The Washington Post was investigating the claims, political reporter, Jonathan Weisman, stated, "Yes, and to be quite honest, we're waiting to see the pictures the Enquirer says it will publish this weekend. That said, Edwards is no longer an elected official and is not running for any office now. Don't expect wall-to-wall coverage."[51] Meanwhile, on that same day, Kaus, at Slate, published an e-mail sent to him the day before from Tony Pierce, an editor at the Los Angeles Times. It was sent to the Times' in-house bloggers, and, referring to the Edwards allegations, stated, "I am asking you all not to blog about this topic until further notified." Kaus portrayed the email as a "gag" order.[52] In an online interview, Pierce defended the e-mail, stating that it was the result of a decision by senior editors at the Times to allow time for the newspaper's Metro Desk to investigate the allegations. Pierce also pointed out that a Times blogger had already posted a story[53] on the Enquirer claims.[54]

On August 8, 2008, in response to a high number of e-mails to the Times, National Editor, Scott Kraft, stated that "this strikes us as a legitimate story".[55] Times bloggers subsequently posted a story on the topic.[56]

Over the period of July 27–28, the claims and speculation about the possible impact on Edwards' political career, from the incident thus far, were picked up by several papers outside the U.S., including The Times,[57] The Independent,[58] Der Spiegel,[59] The Irish Independent,[60] and The Times of India.[61]

In the American political blogosphere, the story was covered by The Drudge Report, Jack Shafer,[62] Kaus[63][64][65] at Slate, Alex Coppelman at Salon.com,[66] Rachel Sklar[67] Lee Stranahan;[68] (Stranahan also cross-posted his article to Daily Kos)[69] at The Huffington Post, independent political pundit, James Joyner,[70] Rod Dreher at The Dallas Morning News,[71] Paul Mulshine at The Star-Ledger,[72] and Guy Adams at The Independent.[73]

Some of the coverage alleged mainstream media bias due to Edwards' Democratic affiliation.[73][74] Others voiced contempt for tabloid papers like the Enquirer[67][72][75][76] and compared the coverage to that of a scandal involving Republican Senator Larry Craig.[62][68] Others claimed that the Enquirer was reliable in regard to scandal reporting, noting the reporting on the Gary Hart/Donna Rice affair,[66] the O. J. Simpson murder case,[72] Jesse Jackson's out-of-wedlock child,[62] and Rush Limbaugh's prescription drug addiction.[66]

Non-coverage was also discussed. Some stated that the non-coverage was motivated by sympathy for Elizabeth Edwards.[66][67][76][77] Several prominent sites criticized the omission of information about the allegations, most notably Gawker.com[78][79] and Roger L. Simon of Pajamas Media,[80][81] whose posts were linked by Glenn Reynolds at the high-traffic weblog, Instapundit.[82] For instance, as of August 6, cable television news network, CNN, had not mentioned the story, and MSNBC had mentioned it once. Several pundits stated that Edwards was "fair game" for reporting on the allegations because he had been recently identified[83] as a potential candidate for vice president or attorney general for Obama,[62][67][73] and that Edwards himself had made his marital fidelity an issue in his campaign.[67]

Blogosphere claims of a media "blackout" extended to the online reference site, Wikipedia, and its biographical article on Edwards. The Wikipedia biography was later changed to include a mention of the allegations' potential impact on Edwards' political career. The controversy over the Wikipedia page was covered by Wired magazine[84] and Kansas City Star columnist Aaron Barnhart, who opined the addition of the information to the Wikipedia article influenced later media coverage of the allegations.[85]

On July 31, 2008, a late-night talk program played part of a David Letterman "Top 10" list that alluded to the charges. On the same night, The O'Reilly Factor played a clip of a Jay Leno monologue from the Tonight Show that mentioned it. Altogether, Fox News had run stories or discussed the matter six times by August 6, more than any other cable news organization.[86][87]

Edwards admits the affair

On August 8, 2008, in a statement that coincided with the Opening Ceremonies of the 2008 Olympic Games,[88] Edwards admitted to the affair but denied he was the father of the child, expressing his willingness to take a paternity test.[5][89] His statement included:

In 2006, I made a serious error in judgment and conducted myself in a way that was disloyal to my family and to my core beliefs. I recognized my mistake and I told my wife that I had a liaison with another woman, and I asked for her forgiveness. Although I was honest in every painful detail with my family, I did not tell the public. When a supermarket tabloid told a version of the story, I used the fact that the story contained many falsities to deny it. But being 99 percent honest is no longer enough...[89]

On the same day, Elizabeth Edwards released a statement that first appeared on the liberal blog, The Daily Kos. The statement said that, in 2006, "John had made a terrible mistake," though she went on to praise her husband for "courage in the face of shame." She also said that she hoped people would watch the interview that aired later that night on the ABC News late-night program, Nightline, in which her husband admitted the affair to Woodruff. She did, in her statement, criticize the claims that her husband fathered a child as an "absurd lie in a tabloid publication." Elizabeth Edwards' seemingly willing participation in the efforts to cover up the affair have also been called into question. "I think she's complicit," said Brad Crone, a Raleigh-based Democratic consultant. "Obviously, she knew. While she's the victim, she clearly didn't stand in the way of the cover-up."[90]

On August 12, 2008, a friend of Hunter's, Pigeon O'Brien, informed CBS News that Edwards had lied about the timeline of the affair. She claimed the affair began in February 2006, six months earlier than the time Edwards had hired Hunter to start working on his political action committee and when he had claimed that the affair had begun. O'Brien also stated that the affair was not a brief liaison, but a mutual, committed relationship based on love; or so Edwards had led Hunter to believe.[91]

On August 13, 2008, Hunter's sister, Roxanne Druck Marshall, participated in an interview with CBS, in which she personally apologized to John Edwards' wife for her sister's behavior. She also claimed Edwards had lied in his confession, because the affair was of a longer duration than the timeframe that he had claimed and was still ongoing. Marshall also stated that, in the days after the story broke, Edwards provided Hunter and her baby with a new and secret domicile to prevent media reporters from finding her. She also called upon Edwards to tell the complete truth about the affair.[92] During that same day, an article from CBS News was published saying, "CBS News legal analyst, Mickey Sherman, told Early Show co-anchor, Maggie Rodriguez, that Edwards may be in legal jeopardy if it could be shown that the funds were used for purposes other than the ones that they had been assigned for. "If you raise money to run for (office)", Sherman explained, "and if you take that money that people have contributed to you based upon the fact that they think their money is going to a presidential candidate, and you give it to a girlfriend of a God-knows-what ... that's a crime.'"[93] The New York Daily News also reported on that same day that, when questioned about the affair by reporters, Mimi Hockman, Hunter's partner in the Midline Groove video production company, "said the contract they signed with John Edwards had a 'hefty' confidentiality clause that bars her from talking."[94] Two days earlier, on August 11, 2008, Hockman had been questioned by reporters from the Star-Ledger at her home. According to reporter, John Mooney, "Mary 'Mimi' Hockman [told reporters], 'Don't waste your time. [...] I'm contractually prohibited from talking to you.'"[95]

On August 18, 2008, David Carr, news media columnist for The New York Times, wrote that while the Enquirer can be inaccurate, its revelations about the Edwards affair were a service to the public:

"There are some stories, especially ones that occur in the bedroom, where mainstream media outlets sometimes can’t venture—or at least they can’t find it in themselves to lead the charge. But it would be hard to argue that the body politic is not enriched by the recent revelations that Mr. Edwards is not who we thought he was, even balanced against the many stories the Enquirer gets wrong." (Even in his confession, Mr. Edwards wrinkled his nose and suggested that the allegations had originated with "supermarket tabloids", as if the method of conveyance absolved him of the deeds described.)[96]

Birth certificate

On August 1, 2008, the Enquirer published an article naming Hunter's child and mainstream news organizations subsequently obtained a copy of the birth certificate,[97] confirming that a girl had been born at Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital on February 27, 2008. The birth certificate listed the mother's name as "Rielle Jaya James Druck," while the child was given the surname "Hunter"; no father's name was listed. Media reports linked the Druck and Hunter surnames on the birth certificate to conclude that the mother was Rielle Hunter; the reports also noted that the child was born approximately two months after Young's claimed paternity had been announced by Hunter and Young.[16][98][99]

When questioned about the omission of the father's name from the birth certificate, Hunter's attorney stated, "A lot of women do that", and that the issue was "a personal matter" between Hunter and Young, before declining to comment further.[100][101]

In late-July and early-August 2008, news outlets reported that Edwards was avoiding further questions from reporters about the Enquirer claims.[16][102] WCNC-TV, a North Carolina television station, reported that Edwards' political career was "effectively frozen", pending resolution of the allegations.[16]

Payments to Hunter and Young

In August 2008, Fred Baron, Edwards' campaign finance chairman, told NBC News that he had been providing financial assistance to both Hunter and Young without Edwards' knowledge; he further stated that no campaign funds had been used.[103] Reportedly, Young had also successfully solicited funds from Rachel Lambert Mellon, also known as "Bunny" Mellon, a 99-year-old heiress to the Mellon fortune.[104]

Reactions

In August 2008, senior figures in the Democratic Party warned that Edwards' failure to respond to the allegations could affect his role at the 2008 Democratic convention. According to Don Fowler, former Democratic National Committee chair, "If there is not an explanation that’s satisfactory, acceptable and meets high moral standards, the answer is 'no,' [Edwards] would not be a prime candidate to make a major address to the convention." Gary Pearce, who ran Edwards' 1998 Senate race, said, "It's a very damaging thing. ... If it's not true, [Edwards] has got to stand up and say, 'This is not true. That is not my child and I'm going to take legal action against the people who are spreading these lies.' It's not enough to say, 'That's tabloid trash.'"[105] Edwards' admission that he engaged in an affair came less than a day after these warnings were published.

Former congressman, David Bonior, Edwards' 2008 presidential campaign manager, stated: "Thousands of friends of the senator and his supporters have put their faith and confidence in him, and he's let them down. They've been betrayed by his action." When asked about Edwards' future in public service, Bonior further stated, "You can't lie in politics and expect to have people's confidence."[106]

Alleged campaign staffers "doomsday" plan

In May 2009, ABC News political correspondent, George Stephanopoulos, reported that campaign staff members became cognizant of the affair in early-2008. Staff members said that if it appeared Edwards was on his way to winning the Democratic Party nomination, they intended to sabotage it for the benefit of the party.[107] Edwards' senior adviser, Joe Trippi, said this report was "complete bullshit". He added, "No one that I know had such a plan. I wasn't involved in a plan like that, it didn't exist, it's a fantasy."[108] However, in August 2006, several staffers—including Josh Brumberger, Kim Rubey, and David Ginsberg—had strong suspicions about the affair and left the campaign over concerns about Hunter. Rubey and Ginsberg later discussed their obligation to the party to come forward with what they knew, after finding Young's paternity claim unconvincing.[109]

Subsequent events

A federal grand jury investigated whether any of Edwards' campaign funds were misspent on covering up the affair and, on August 6, 2009, Hunter testified before a federal grand jury in Raleigh, North Carolina.[104]

On January 21, 2010, John Edwards admitted that he was, indeed, Quinn's father.[110] In late January 2010, John and Elizabeth separated.[111] In February 2010, The National Enquirer reported that Edwards had proposed to Hunter, but that report was categorically denied by an Edwards spokesperson.[112]

Although Young had previously stated he was the father, he recanted in a book proposal.[104] In a pre-release copy of Young's book, obtained by the Wall Street Journal, Young revealed that after Edwards and Hunter returned from a trip to Uganda in 2006, Elizabeth answered Edward's mobile to hear Hunter "launch into a romantic monologue." Edwards confessed to having had a one-night stand but did not say with whom. He returned the call in front of his wife to end the affair, but later called Hunter back to say he did not mean it. Young also revealed that Edwards had confided in him about wanting to leave "crazy Elizabeth", but could not, as she engaged with American voters better than he did.[113]

Rielle Hunter also released a book about the relationship and announced her breakup with Edwards on the day of the book's release in 2012.[114]

On June 3, 2011, Edwards was indicted by a North Carolina grand jury on six felony charges. Edwards faced a maximum sentence of thirty years in prison and a $1.5 million fine, or a USD250,000 fine and/or five years imprisonment per charge.[115] The indictment came after the failure of intensive negotiations for a plea bargain agreement. The agreement would have meant that Edwards would have been required to plead guilty to three misdemeanor campaign finance law violations, in addition to a six-month prison sentence, but would have allowed Edwards to keep his law license.[116]

After delays, due to John Edwards' medical condition, jury selection for the trial began on April 12, 2012. Opening arguments began on April 23, 2012.[117] A verdict (not guilty on one count and a mistrial on the remaining five) to the trial was reached on May 31, 2012.[118]

The trial was criticized by Republicans, such as Michael Steele and Joe Scarborough, who referred to the procedure as "an absolute waste of resources."[117]

References

  1. ^ Greg Pollowitz (July 24, 2008). "Where's HuffPo on Edwards?". NRO Weekend. National Review Online. Retrieved December 15, 2012.
  2. ^ Mickey Kaus (April 28, 2008). "Elizabeth Edwards' Chutzpah Plus--Obama, from Cling to Ping!". Slate. The Slate Group, a Division of the Washington Post Company. Retrieved December 15, 2012.
  3. ^ Clark Hoyt (August 9, 2008). "Sometimes, There's News in the Gutter". The New York Times. Retrieved December 15, 2012.
  4. ^ "John Edwards Admits He Fathered Rielle Hunter's Child During Affair". Abcnews.go.com. January 21, 2010. Retrieved November 27, 2011.
  5. ^ a b Schwarz, Rhonda; Woodruff, Brian (August 8, 2008). "Edwards Admits Sexual Affair; Lied as Presidential Candidate". ABC News.
  6. ^ Schwartz, Rhonda; Brian Ross (August 9, 2008). "Mistress' Family Challenges Edwards to Take DNA Test". ABC News.
  7. ^ "Edwards admits fathering child with mistress". Today.msnbc.msn.com. January 21, 2010. Retrieved November 27, 2011.
  8. ^ "John Edwards and wife separate". Reuters. Reuters. January 27, 2010. Retrieved December 15, 2012.
  9. ^ Ann Oldenburg (January 27, 2010). "Elizabeth Edwards tells her sister: 'I've had it.'". USA Today. USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Co. Inc. Retrieved December 15, 2012.
  10. ^ "John Edwards Made Sex Tape, Abortion Plea, Aide Says". Abcnews.go.com. January 28, 2010. Retrieved November 27, 2011.
  11. ^ John Edwards Webisode 1: Plane Truths (internet video). Webcastr.com. 2008.
  12. ^ John Edwards Webisode 2: The Golden Rule (internet video). Webcastr.com. 2008.
  13. ^ John Edwards Webisode 3: Plight of Uganda (internet video). Webcastr.com. 2008.
  14. ^ John Edwards Webisode 4: Plugs (internet video). Webcastr.com. 2008.
  15. ^ Darman, Jonathan (December 25, 2006). "Politics 2008: John Edwards, Untucked". Newsweek.
  16. ^ a b c d Watson, Stuart (August 1, 2008). "No father on alleged love child's birth certificate". WCNC-TV. [dead link]
  17. ^ Holahan, Catherine. "The Year in Web Video". Business Week.
  18. ^ "Just Asking". New York Post. August 27, 2007.
  19. ^ a b "John Edwards's Docudrama: The Anatomy of Innuendo". New York. October 11, 2007.
  20. ^ Cockburn, Alexander (August 8, 2008). "The Edwards scandal in full". The Eureka Reporter.
  21. ^ Stein, Sam (September 26, 2007). "Edwards Mystery: Innocuous Videos Suddenly Shrouded In Secrecy". The Huffington Post.
  22. ^ a b York, Byron (July 23, 2008). "The Democratic ticket and the John Edwards affair". The Hill.
  23. ^ Pitney, Nico (September 30, 2007). "Mystery Edwards Videos Reappear On Web". The Huffington Post.
  24. ^ Stein, Sam (October 10, 2007). "Scrubbed: Edwards Filmmaker's Deleted Website Raises Questions". The Huffington Post.
  25. ^ "Edwards Says Tabloid Report of Extramarital Affair Is 'Completely Untrue'". ABC News. October 11, 2007. Archived from the original on July 31, 2008. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  26. ^ "Breaking News: John Edwards denies affair with campaign worker". Top of the Ticket. Los Angeles Times. October 11, 2007. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  27. ^ "Edwards Denies Tabloid Report Of Affair". Political Bulletin. U.S. News & World Report. October 12, 2007. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  28. ^ Kaus, Mickey (October 11, 2007). "Edwards Walks the Line". Slate.
  29. ^ Smith, Ben (October 11, 2007). "The Clintonite who owns National Enquirer". The Politico.
  30. ^ "Tabloid's affair rumor dispelled, says John Edwards". Rush & Molloy. Daily News. November 29, 2007. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  31. ^ Armstrong, Jerome (December 19, 2007). "Is this really happening?". MyDD. Archived from the original on August 8, 2008.
  32. ^ Shea, Danny (December 19, 2007). "National Enquirer Enters The 2008 Presidential Race With Edwards Love-Child Story". The Huffington Post.
  33. ^ Schieffer, Bob (December 19, 2007). Imus in the Morning (Interview). Interviewed by Don Imus. ABC http://www.webcitation.org/5ZvdaZz78?url=http://mediamatters.org/items/200712190010?f=h_latest. Archived from the original on August 8, 2008. {{cite interview}}: Missing or empty |title= (help); Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |subjectlink= ignored (|subject-link= suggested) (help)
  34. ^ Kaus, Mickey (December 26, 2007). "Undernews Underanalysis". Slate.
  35. ^ a b c d "Guard Confirms Late-Night Hotel Encounter Between Ex-Sen. John Edwards, Tabloid Reporters". Fox News. July 25, 2008.
  36. ^ a b Shah, Neel (July 29, 2008). "Where Are the John Edwards Photos?". Radar.
  37. ^ "John Edwards' Alleged Mistress Speaks!". Extra. July 23, 2008. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  38. ^ Witheridge, Annette (August 7, 2008). "John Edwards love child rumours threaten the Barack Obama presidential campaign". Daily Mail. London.
  39. ^ "'National Enquirer' Still Chasing John Edwards–Affair Story; Claim to Have Caught Him in Hotel Tryst". New York. July 22, 2008.
  40. ^ Boyd, Walker (July 29, 2008). "Edwards' Mistress Dishes on Sleeping with Powerful Rich Men, Sort of". Radar. Archived from the original on August 5, 2008. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  41. ^ Shah, Neel (July 31, 2008). "John Edwards' Money Man: Fellow Tar Heel Eric Montross?". Radar.
  42. ^ Fine, Jon (July 23, 2008). "John Edwards, The National Enquirer, And The Mainstream Press". Fine on Media. Business Week. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  43. ^ "Edwards scandal: Silence, please". Tampa Bay Times. July 24, 2008.
  44. ^ Morrill, Jim (July 24, 2008). "Did Edwards' VP chances take tabloid hit?". The Charlotte Observer.
  45. ^ Gensler, Howard (July 25, 2008). "Tattle: 'Enquirer' links John Edwards, Rielle Hunter". Philadelphia Inquirer. Archived from the original on July 29, 2008.
  46. ^ Herrington, Gregg (July 25, 2008). "VP guessing game is heating up". The Columbian. Archived from the original on July 31, 2008.
  47. ^ Rennie, Kevin (July 27, 2008). "A Star Turn For Elizabeth Edwards". The Hartford Courant.
  48. ^ Valentine, Phil (July 27, 2008). "Media decisions over gossip vs. news get tangled in politics". The Tennessean. [dead link]
  49. ^ Beck, Glenn (July 23, 2008). "Transcripts of July 23, 2008 show". CNN.
  50. ^ Roberts, Roxanne (July 23, 2008). "The Reliable Source". The Washington Post.
  51. ^ Weisman, Jonathan (July 25, 2008). "Post Politics Hour". The Washington Post.
  52. ^ Kaus, Mickey (July 25, 2008). "LAT Gags Blogs". Slate.
  53. ^ Khan, Amina (July 23, 2008). "National Enquirer alleges John Edwards affair; blogosphere readies salt shaker". Los Angeles Times.
  54. ^ Owens, Simon (July 29, 2008). "LA Times blog editor Tony Pierce responds to criticism about National Enquirer story". Bloggasm.
  55. ^ Gold, Jamie (August 7, 2008). "Handling the John Edwards story". Readers' Representative Journal. The Los Angeles Times. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  56. ^ Malcolm, Andrew (August 8, 2007). "Rielle Hunter video of John Edwards' during affair". Top of the Ticket. The Los Angeles Times. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  57. ^ Baxter, Sarah (July 27, 2008). "Sleaze scuppers Democrat golden boy". The Times. London.
  58. ^ Adams, Guy (July 27, 2008). "Love child and mistress claims hit Edwards". The Independent. London.
  59. ^ "Abend in Erhabenheit und Würde". Der Spiegel. July 28, 2008.
  60. ^ Healy, Orla (July 27, 2008). "VP dreams end in Rielle nightmare". The Irish Independent.
  61. ^ "Obama's running mate in sex scandal". The Times of India. July 28, 2008.
  62. ^ a b c d Shafer, Jack (July 23, 2007). "Why the Press Is Ignoring the Edwards "Love Child" Story". Slate.
  63. ^ Kaus, Mickey (July 23, 2008). "Edwards, Busted". Slate.
  64. ^ Kaus, Mickey (July 28, 2008). "Does Obama Want Edwards Gone?". Slate.
  65. ^ Kaus, Mickey (July 29, 2008). "NE to MSM--No Pix Fix". Slate.
  66. ^ a b c d Coppelman, Alex (July 25, 2008). "The John Edwards "love child" story". Salon.com.
  67. ^ a b c d e Sklar, Rachel (July 30, 2008). "Why Won't The Media Cover Edwards? Because They Don't Have To Yet". The Huffington Post.
  68. ^ a b Stranahan, Lee (July 27, 2008). "Say It Ain't So, John -- Why Progressives Need To Get Out In Front Of The John Edwards Affair Rumors". The Huffington Post.
  69. ^ Stranahan, Lee (July 26, 2008). "Say It Ain't So, John. Progressives And The Edwards Affair". Daily Kos.
  70. ^ Joyner, James (July 22, 2008). "John Edwards Love Child Scandal". Outside the Beltway.
  71. ^ Dreher, Rod (July 25, 2008). "LA Times gag on Edwards love child story". The Dallas Morning News.
  72. ^ a b c Mulshine, Paul (August 2, 2008). "Bloggers still beating MSM on Edwards story". The Star-Ledger.
  73. ^ a b c Adams, Guy (August 4, 2008). "Guy Adams' US Media Diary: The 'scoop' the US papers ignored". The Independent. London.
  74. ^ Mulshine, Paul (July 31, 2008). "Monkey business on the Edwards story?". The Star-Ledger.
  75. ^ Tate, Ryan (July 24, 2008). "What John Edwards Scandal?". Gawker.com. Archived from the original on January 16, 2014. Retrieved February 17, 2014. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  76. ^ a b Estrich, Susan (August 1, 2008). "Is an Ex-Senator's Alleged Love Child News?". Fox News. Retrieved February 17, 2014. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  77. ^ Kaplan, Marty (July 31, 2008). "On Having Your (Political) Heart Broken". The Huffington Post.
  78. ^ "Pareene" (July 28, 2008). "John Edwards' Wikipedia Page Strangely Love Child-Free". Gawker.com.
  79. ^ "Pareene" (July 29, 2008). "Meet the Mistress! (Just Not on Wikipedia)". Gawker.com. Archived from the original on August 19, 2008. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  80. ^ Simon, Roger L. (July 28, 2008). "Edwards: Wikipedia engages in some 'political cleansing'". Pajamas Media.
  81. ^ Simon, Roger L. (August 4, 2008). "Censored John Edwards/Wikipedia love child page revealed". Pajamas Media.
  82. ^ Reynolds, Glenn (July 28, 2008). "Political Cleansing at Wikipedia". Instapundit.
  83. ^ Thomas, Ken (June 19, 2008). "Edwards, Nunn on Obama's Veep List". Time. Associated Press. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  84. ^ Stirland, Sarah Lai (July 30, 2008). "Wikipedians Wrestle Over John Edwards Love-Child Rumor". Wired.
  85. ^ Barnhart, Aaron (July 31, 2008). "The John Edwards love-baby story: What took so long?". The Kansas City Star.
  86. ^ "How the Cablers Have Covered the Edwards Story". TVNewser feature at Mediabistro.com. August 4, 2008. [dead link]
  87. ^ "Cablers Still Mostly Silent on John Edwards Enquirer Story". TVNewser feature at Mediabistro.com. August 7, 2008.
  88. ^ "Can John Edwards make a comeback?". CNN. November 11, 2008. Retrieved November 22, 2008.
  89. ^ a b "John Edwards' statement of August 8, 2008". CNN. August 8, 2008.
  90. ^ "Wife blasted for keeping Edwards affair secret". CNN. August 26, 2008. Archived from the original on August 28, 2008. Retrieved August 26, 2008. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  91. ^ Edwards Account Challenged (internet video). CBS News. 2008.
  92. ^ Edwards' Ex-Mistress' Sister Pans Both: Says Her Family Is "Very Upset," And She Feels Most For Edwards' Cancer-Stricken Wife (internet video). CBS News. 2008.
  93. ^ CBSNews (February 11, 2009). "Report: $$ Still Flows To Edwards' Ex". CBS News. Retrieved December 15, 2012.
  94. ^ Celeste Katz, Soo Youn and Helen Kennedy (August 13, 2008). "John Edwards is the daddy, Rielle Hunter pal sez". New York daily News. Retrieved August 13, 2008.
  95. ^ Mooney, John (August 11, 2008). "Jerseyan brushes off questions on Edwards turmoil". Retrieved August 13, 2008.
  96. ^ Carr, David (August 18, 2008). "The Enquirer: Even Scandal Can Be News". The New York Times; The Media Equation" column, Business section. Retrieved February 17, 2014. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  97. ^ State of California (March 4, 2008). "Birth Certificate, Frances Quinn Hunter" (PDF).
  98. ^ "Charlotte Paper Obtains Birth Certificate for Alleged Edwards 'Love Child'". Editor & Publisher. July 31, 2008.
  99. ^ "Mainstream Media Reports On Edwards Sex Scandal". The Raleigh Telegram. August 1, 2008.
  100. ^ Zagaroli, Lisa (July 31, 2008). "Birth certificate of child linked to Edwards lists no father". McClatchy News Service.
  101. ^ Zagaroli, Lisa; Perez, Lorenzo (July 31, 2008). "Birth record for child lists no father". The News & Observer. McClatchy Newspapers. Archived from the original on August 6, 2008. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  102. ^ Zagaroli, Lisa (July 31, 2008). "Why isn't John Edwards answering reporters' questions?". McClatchy Newspapers.
  103. ^ Todd, Chuck; Popkin, Jim (August 8, 2008). "Edwards Finance Chair Denies Hush Money". NBC News.
  104. ^ a b c Lewis, Neil (September 19, 2009). "For Edwards, Drama Builds Toward a Denouement". New York Times. Retrieved November 30, 2009.
  105. ^ Johnson, Mark (August 6, 2008). "Tabloid's claims threaten Edwards' role at party's convention". McClatchy Newspapers. Retrieved August 6, 2008.
  106. ^ Yost, Pete (August 8, 2008). "Edwards admits he had affair after heated denials". USA Today. Associated Press. Retrieved January 27, 2010.
  107. ^ Stephanopoulos, George (May 10, 2009). "Edwards Staff had Affair 'Doomsday' strategy". ABC News.
  108. ^ Mooney, Alexander (May 11, 2009). "Trippi refutes claim Edwards staffers knew of affair". CNN. Retrieved May 13, 2009.
  109. ^ John Heilemann (January 18, 2010). "Saint Elizabeth and the Ego Monster". New York. Retrieved December 15, 2012.
  110. ^ Lisa Myers and Michael Austin (January 21, 2010). "Edwards admits fathering child with mistress". NBC News. Retrieved January 21, 2010.
  111. ^ Shapiro, Lila (January 27, 2010). "John-Elizabeth Edwards SPLIT: Legally Separated". Huffington Post.
  112. ^ Shapiro, Lila (February 10, 2010). "Rielle Hunter To Marry Him, National Enquirer Reports". Huffington Post.
  113. ^ Mail Foreign Service (January 29, 2010). "'It's an extraordinarily sad moment': John Edwards tells of pain over separation from terminally ill wife after his affair". The Daily Mail. Retrieved December 15, 2012.
  114. ^ "Rielle Hunter, John Edwards Breakup Announced Same Day As Book Release". Ibtimes.com. Retrieved December 17, 2012.
  115. ^ "Edwards arrives in NC court to face felony charges". Associated Press. June 3, 2011. Retrieved June 3, 2011.
  116. ^ J. Andrew Curliss; Joseph Neff (June 5, 2011). "Prison sentence doomed Edwards plea deal". newsobserver.com. The News & Observer Publishing Company A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company. Retrieved December 15, 2012.
  117. ^ a b Darius Dixon (April 13, 2012). "Michael Steele, Joe Scarborough rip John Edwards trial". Politico. POLITICO LLC. Retrieved December 15, 2012.
  118. ^ James Hill; Beth Lloyd (May 31, 2012). "John Edwards Not Guilty on 1 Count, but Admits Moral Failing; Mistrial on 5 Other Counts". ABC News. ABC News Internet Ventures. Yahoo! - ABC News Network. Retrieved December 15, 2012.