Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

"WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests for unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests for unprotection, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G5 or G11 be undeleted here.

Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases

• G13. Abandoned Articles for creation submissions – see Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13 for instructions.

float

float

Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

I want my page back

Can I please have my FC Bayern Munich (seniors) back? I miss it so much! GermanGamer77 (talk) 20:44, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

@AustralianRupert: Pinging deleting admin so that they may participate in this discussion. ToThAc (talk) 18:43, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Given that there was basically no content (other than "Please add content, it would very much be appreciated!") on the page when it was deleted per A3, I'm not sure that there is much point in me restoring it (although, if another admin feels it is best to restore it, I won't object). @GermanGamer77: are you intending to write the article? If you have content to add, please just simply recreate the article yourself by clicking on the redlink: FC Bayern Munich (seniors) and then creating it as if it were a new page. But please only do this by adding substantive content about the subject, otherwise it will be liable for being speedily deleted as lacking content again. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 06:26, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Alright then, AustralianRupert. I'll visit your page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GermanGamer77 (talk • contribs) 18:05, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Maritime science fiction

• Draft:Maritime science fiction · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I was still working on this draft until it suddenly got deleted yesterday without warning. I was going to add more reliable academic source besides just lists (there are only two lists cited there) as well as external link from the Encyclopedia of Science Fiction but was unable to do so because of the deletion. Other users were also working on it (see history of the page). Also I did NOT attempt to publish this draft until it was properly sourced and submitted for review. Other users also contributed but I was currently also adding my input and cannot do so because of sudden deletion. Please let us have the draft thanks.--Taeyebar 18:24, 29 April 2017 (UTC) —Taeyebar 18:24, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

• It looks like this was salted by Orangemike because the page was repeatedly recreated. I'm going to ping him so he can come and weigh in on this and the other request you made. Since both are related to two AfDs that were closed by Sandstein, I'm tagging him here as well. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:41, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
• No opinion here.  Sandstein  17:30, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
• Tokyogirl79, like I mentioned before, the article was deleted, so we produced a draft from it. I had requested User:Fixuture who contributed to the article to save a draft to the article and the list and if I'm not mistaken he already had drafts saved for the article and list since there was an AFD. We NEVER published the drafts nor were the drafts ever deleted prior to this. Please read carefully. Thanks.--Taeyebar 23:36, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

• Taeyebar, I understand that, however since this was deleted at AfD and the articles salted (including the draft), any recreation of this article could be seen as controversial - even in the draftspace. REFUND is really only meant for uncontroversial restorations. It's fairly rare that a draft article is salted and in most cases this occurs when a situation is seen as controversial. My reason for pinging Orangemike and the others is to see what the story is here. At the very least this doesn't seem like it would really be suitable for REFUND given the situation, especially as Orangemike has responded with a decline response and Sandstein has stated that he has no opinion. Sandstein, are you willing to restore the article? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:57, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

• No, I do not undelete deleted articles. I leave this to others who find this useful. I don't.  Sandstein  06:17, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maritime science fiction, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Sandstein (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:47, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

But isn't it a draft, not an article? Could you please restore it? User:Orangemike at worst case you need to notify the draft-creators first before deletion so that they can take any useful/constructive content elsewhere (e.g. Wikia or simply on their PC). --Fixuture (talk) 19:03, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

• Tokyogirl79, the story was simple: There was a AFD. By two or three votes there was a consensus to delete the article and the list.There was no controversy involved, only a consensus that were were not enough reliable sources- and I agree, which is why I was adding more sources in draft format (including from The Encyclopedia of Underwater and Maritime Archaeology and The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction). Fixuture already had the drafts prepared before the article & list was deleted. Then suddenly without any warning, about two days ago, both the drafts were deleted. So how can I add more reliable sources if I have no access to the drafts? If I create the article again- especially after AFD- I will probably get blocked. If I submitted a draft for review after it's ready, then that is the right way to do it. We are NOT asking for the article and list, just their drafts, which was deleted without warning And there was nothing controversial about this article. The argument was there was not enough reliable sources, so I am adding more of them, but in draft format. How can a stub article be a controversial topic?--Taeyebar 22:03, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

NVR, Inc.

• NVR, Inc. · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Contesting PROD: we will certainly be able to demonstrate notability of one of the largest homebuilding companies in the U.S., a member of the S&P 400 stock market index. —UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:06, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

@UnitedStatesian: Would you please explain who is this "we" you refer to? ~Anachronist (talk) 22:31, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

The global community of English Wikipedia editors. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:51, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

@UnitedStatesian: OK, fair enough. It's a standard question asked here to assess COI, when someone refers to "we" as if the editor self-identifies as a member of an organization.

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:03, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Anuradha Bhattacharyya

• Anuradha Bhattacharyya · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Atul Bhattacharyya (talk) 07:31, 2 May 2017 (UTC) Request for undeletion of Anuradha Bhattacharyya page

as significant new information has come to light since a deletion that would justify recreating the deleted page;

2 years ago I had created a page 'Anuradha Bhattacharyya'. She had 5 published books to her credit. However, there was no mention of her name in any newspapers then (except in The Hans as a participant poet in a poetry festival). Now she has 2 more books. The novel One Word has won a government prize in her state. All the newspapers in English, Hindi and Punjabi mention the 'Chandigarh Sahitya Akademi honour for writers/authors'. In the photograph, she is standing in the middle. Her name is spelt 'Anuradha Bhattacharya' which is a sub-editor's error. Bengalis do not spell it wrong; Punjabis do. Still there are 3 distinct sources which say that Anuradha Bhattacharyya has received the Chandigarh Sahitya Akademi Award for Best Book in 2016 for her novel One Word. I think this makes her notable. Please publish the page I had created. Here are the links:

http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/chandigarh/education/sahitya-akademi-honour-for-writers/384418.html

http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/NewsDetail/index/7/10416/An-Author-and-a-Poet-Speaks

https://kitaab.org/tag/anuradha-bhattacharyya/

http://lifeinchandigarh.com/news-views_and-the-award-goes-to#.WQRucyYBzMA.whatsapp

http://www.bhaskar.com/news/UT-CHD-HMU-NES-MAT-latest-chandigarh-news-020003-2501637-NOR.html

Thank you AtulAtul Bhattacharyya (talk) 07:31, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

@Anthony Appleyard: based on the above, any objection to restoring the article to draft space? If it were restored to main space it would likely get tagged with a {{db-g4}}. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:58, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Dear Anthony @Anthony Appleyard:, I have no objection to restoring the article to draft space. In any case these citations and new informations have to be added to the page first before publication. AtulAtul Bhattacharyya (talk) 19:16, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

• @Atul Bhattacharyya and Anachronist:  Done The page is now at Draft:Anuradha Bhattacharyya. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:27, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you @Anthony Appleyard: !! Now I will edit it, make the necessary changes. AtulAtul Bhattacharyya (talk) 11:05, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

• @Atul Bhattacharyya and Anachronist:, ~Anachronist, @Anthony Appleyard:.

I have made the necessary edits. Please see. If it's okay, publish the page. Thank you. AtulAtul Bhattacharyya (talk) 12:27, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

• @Atul Bhattacharyya and Anachronist:  Done The page is now at Anuradha Bhattacharyya. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:33, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. AtulAtul Bhattacharyya (talk) 08:54, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:ENVI-met

• Draft:ENVI-met · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 87.171.59.21, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 87.171.59.21 (talk) 07:49, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

no chnace to edit withn 24 hrs after notice —87.171.59.21 (talk) 07:52, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:55, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

S.M.A.R.T. Chase

• S.M.A.R.T. Chase · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

It appears administrator User:Yamla deleted the page because he thought it had been written by a marketing company named Bliss Media, potentially violating WP:Paid. As a fan interested in Orlando Bloom's latest filmography and unaffiliated to Bliss Media, I stumbled upon new evidence from Elle (magazine) UK that this particular "controversial" movie will be shown after all. Therefore, I reached out to User:Yamla, trying to understand exactly what had been written to see if any of the marketing content could be removed and the article be edited to exclude any unattributed writing, but s/he insisted on WP:RFU. I think this is now the proper step to solve this. My intent is to recover the deleted page and improve the writing to include only attributable content. Thanks. —Supermansaga (talk) 12:39, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

I'm certainly not opposed to this undeletion. My concern is that the page as it existed prior to deletion was entirely a violation of WP:PAID and WP:COI and somewhat, WP:PROMO. I therefore am not sure whether or not the page should be undeleted or whether an entirely new, uncontaminated, article should be created. I say this without prejudice. Whoever reviews this request is entirely free to act as they see fit. --Yamla (talk) 14:15, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Yamla. @Supermansaga:  Done, I have restored the article and removed a bit of puffery from it. As it stands now, it doesn't seem unambiguously promotional, regardless of the pedigree of its past contributors. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:11, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! Anachronist I highly appreciate it. Is it possible to also restore the movie poster in the article at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Upload?wpDestFile=S.M.A.R.T._Chase_3-6-2017.jpg? I'm a bit confused by the upload process and want to leave it at the hands of the capable. The picture is publicly available at http://weibo.com/5866419168/Eyxcm5nUI. Thanks. In the meantime, I am curious if I could have access to any other relevant pages deleted by Yamla and Ad Orientem, such as Bliss Media and/or Wei Han. I want to know if any puffery within them could be removed. Some new lawsuit info regarding them recently came to light by the way as reported by The Hollywood Reporter and what not. Thanks.Supermansaga (talk) 05:21, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

@Supermansaga: Unfortunately, the poster wasn't deleted because it was orphaned, it was deleted because it was missing required information, specifically the source of the image, so that copyright can be verified. If I restored it, it would simply be deleted again, unless you can provide me with the source of the image. The deleted image doesn't appear on the page you linked. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:47, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Scratch that, it was my web filtering software suppressing the image. I see it now. In any case, that isn't the same image. The deleted image is much larger. It cannot be restored because it is too large for a non-free fair-use image. Please re-upload a smaller one; the one on that page you linked should be about right; it's only 305px in width. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:06, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Cool. I re-uploaded the movie poster at 480x712 pixels to Wikimedia Commons, but I am still confused about the licensing condition, so I just selected the button, "I found it online and understood it could be subject to deletion." Is this the right approach? I certainly don't want to do overboard marketing for Bliss Media, despite I would like to see its own page restored and free from puffery. Thanks.Supermansaga (talk) 07:04, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

@Supermansaga: No, that's a non-free fair-use image. Commons is for public-domain or other images released under an acceptable free license like Creative Commons or GFDL. Unless there is a clear statement on that web site that the image is public domain or freely re-usable, it absolutely cannot be kept on Commons. You must upload it to the English Wikipedia only. And as a non-free image, it must be low-resolution; please use the small 305px-wide image located here: https://wx2.sinaimg.cn/orj360/006p0TC0gy1fdd3mooxy3j30qo13jwx7.jpg ~Anachronist (talk) 07:59, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

@Anachronist: Your wish is my command. I have fixed the resolution. It appears it's 360 in width not 306 by default?

The file at https://wx2.sinaimg.cn/orj360/006p0TC0gy1fdd3mooxy3j30qo13jwx7.jpg appears smaller to me, but what you did is OK. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:48, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

@Anachronist: Great! Just saw your reply. Once I saved the pix from your url and right-click on its property, it shows the width is 360, not 306. So I assume it's the same without the need for my further tinkering. Now is it safe to ask for RFU on Bliss Media and Wei Han? I believe you could help clean up any puffery. In the meantime, I want to write about the lawsuits they face. Interesting times. Without the original text, it's hard for me to begin. thanks.Supermansaga (talk) 09:16, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

FTR: SPI opened. --bonadea contributions talk 09:50, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

...and Supermansaga has been blocked for sockpuppetry. :-( Perhaps S.M.A.R.T. Chase should be deleted as created by a sock of a blocked user; looking at it, it's mostly about Bliss Media and their lawsuits. Very little actual sourced content about the film itself. --bonadea contributions talk 15:15, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

@Bonadea: It wasn't created by a sock; Supermansaga started editing it a while after it was created by someone else. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:09, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Dunk Elite

• Draft:Dunk Elite · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Primestarsports, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Primestarsports (talk) 14:25, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

@Primestarsports: Please do two things first.

1. Go to WP:CHU/Simple and change your username to something that represents only you as an individual person. You can call yourself "Joe at PrimeStar" or something similar if you want to retain a connection with your employer, as long as it's clear that the username belongs to one person, not a group. Companies, as well as roles (like "Marketing at PrimeStar") are prohibited from having user accounts on Wikipedia.

2. When you created an account here, you made a legally enforceable agreement to abide by Wikimedia:Terms of Use, which requires that you disclose your conflict of interest. See WP:PAID for instructions on this disclosure. I recommend you do it on your user page.

Come back here when you've done those things. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:50, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Dan Jackson

• Draft:Dan Jackson · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I wish to improve on the article by adding new information — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caroline neufeld (talk • contribs) 01:26, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:15, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Boomtown Biloxi

• Draft:Boomtown Biloxi · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 2602:302:D1A2:C740:2498:B760:3460:9336, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2602:302:D1A2:C740:2498:B760:3460:9336 (talk) 07:19, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:16, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Hampstead Anti-Alien Petition

• Draft:Hampstead Anti-Alien Petition · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

DanInMiami (talk) 10:07, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

@DanInMiami: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:22, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

First Merit Tower

• First Merit Tower · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The page was incorrectly deleted for technical reasons. It should be restored and then moved to the name Huntington Tower, as that is the building's current name. Then, First Merit Tower should serve as a redirect to Huntington Tower. —Piguy101 (talk) 12:13, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

@Piguy101: The deleted file is just a redirect, originally to FirstMerit Tower. Feel free to recreate it. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:41, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Ronald K Sable

• Draft:Ronald K Sable · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Ricks333 (talk) 15:11, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

this seems to be a promotional CV. without any 3rd party references. DGG ( talk ) 23:36, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

I agree. @Ricks333: what is your association with Ronald K Sable? ~Anachronist (talk) 23:47, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

privacy in social Information Access

• Privacy in Social Information Access · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

this topic is concern about only the privacy issue in social information access and it is a part of course project i am taking this semester —Azizsalim (talk) 02:42, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Has your instructor gone thru WP:School and university projects? —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 16:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Oye_Akideinde

• Draft:Oye_Akideinde · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 169.159.95.114, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 169.159.95.114 (talk) 09:18, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:29, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:360nobs

• Draft:360nobs · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 154.66.63.74, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 154.66.63.74 (talk) 10:03, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:28, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Qmarkets

• Draft:Qmarkets · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Bigross86, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bigross86 (talk) 11:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

@Bigross86: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.

There is also some additional contribution history from before you created that draft. That is also restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:26, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

CoNetrix

• CoNetrix · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I would like to try and re-edit the CoNetrix page and submit again. We have more links to prove it is reputable. It was previously deleted by OrangeMike in 2009.

Thanks! —Prlandru (talk) 12:36, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

The history of this is now at Draft:CoNetrix. ~ GB fan 17:23, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Jack Picone self-portrait in Sydney, Australia.jpg

• File:Jack Picone self-portrait in Sydney, Australia.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

We obtained the author's permission via OTRS ticket:2017031310009215. Thanks —Ruthven (talk) 13:22, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

@Ruthven: Done, I've reset the deletion mark, remember to add the permission template. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:53, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

 Done Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 15:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Novara Media

• Novara Media · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

Whilst in 2015 Novara Media may not have met the notability guidelines the organisation has grown significantly since and senior editors of the site regularly appear as pundits on British television. It has a significant social media following and has had over 1 million views on YouTube. —Garymysz (talk) 17:11, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

 Not done. Since notability is not inherited, how does the company become notable just because its staff members have appeared on TV? Also, YouTube views are not a valid criterion for notability on Wikipedia. You might ask the deleting admin Spartaz to consider restoration to draft space for improvement, if you can demonstrate that the company meets WP:CORP requirements (which are not media appearances by staff or YouTube views). ~Anachronist (talk) 14:13, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Magnolia Summer

• Draft:Magnolia Summer · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Coalminecanary, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Coalminecanary (talk) 17:21, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

I had a few edits left before submitting it; however, time slipped away from me. I would like to save the page and resubmit for consideration. —Coalminecanary (talk) 17:24, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

@Coalminecanary: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:10, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Tom Gildred

• Tom Gildred · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Page went through speedy deletion because it was created by a banned user. I John Ryan, am not banned, and I would like to restore/revise the article. —JohnPRyan (talk) 17:31, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

@JohnPRyan:  Done, the article has been restored to draft space at Draft:Tom Gildred. Please work on it there and submit for review. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:13, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

ice_poseidon

• Ice_poseidon · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Well written page with numerous sources was deleted instantly with no discussion. —Jimmybobbyson (talk) 18:17, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Acroterion (talk · contribs)) instead. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 18:29, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

DaCast

• DaCast · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Page was deleted with very little discussion. Though the page in its final state was promotional, I hardly think it is a G11 candidate and seems a good base to work forward from. —Owen (talk) 19:37, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DaCast, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Kurykh (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:16, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

And I agree it would have been a G11 candidate. The way it's written, as if it came straight from the company's "about us" page on their web site, makes it seem like the article existed solely for publicity purposes. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:18, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Harrison Myers

• Harrison Myers · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —WilliamJCartrightIII (talk) 22:57, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

13:41, 15 July 2016 Iridescent (talk | contribs) deleted page Harrison Myers (Expired PROD, concern was: IMDB and a non-independent source only; no evidence of notability)

This is the information stating why my page was deleted in 2016. It's continually argued that I have no notability of the films, and I should have listed enough reputable links in my "External Links" section. I am baffled as to what was considered inadequate.

That's because we require inline citations for biographies. As noted, wikis (such as IMDB) and sources connected to the subject are not appropriate sources. What film news articles have discussed you in depth? —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 04:07, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Other than IMBD, what else comes to mind, or doesn't — Preceding unsigned comment added by WilliamJCartrightIII (talk • contribs) 04:15, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

CoNetrix (2nd request)

• CoNetrix · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I asked for the CoNetrix page to be restored previously and the page itself was, but none of the content with it. Is it possible to get the latest version deleted of CoNetrix restored to my user page? —Prlandru (talk) 13:49, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

@Prlandru: Above, the history was restored to Draft:CoNetrix but then that draft article was speedily deleted by Seraphimblade after it was tagged as unambiguous promotion. As such, it is ineligible for restoration now, unless you can convince Seraphimblade to restore it to draft space for further improvement. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:16, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Kaleina Cordova (actress)

• Draft:Kaleina Cordova (actress) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

2601:58C:C200:F4B4:198D:4C71:9A96:8E95 (talk) 16:19, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

The draft had already been re-created, but  Done, the page history is restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:08, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Nowthis nerd

• Nowthis nerd · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I haven't been able to find a way to contact either the person who flagged the page to be deleted or the admin who deleted the page. None of the information I posted on the page was incorrect, however I'd happily discuss the facts involved if given the opportunity —Andyt2k (talk) 02:01, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Acroterion (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:18, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Sapna Punia

• Sapna Punia · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Redirect contains attribution history for content merged into Sapana Sapana. A bot deleted the page when the target article was temporarily moved to draft space. —• Gene93k (talk) 10:03, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

@Gene93k:  Done, and I have provided the missing copyright attribution upon the merge here, added {{R from merge}} to the redirect, and explained the issue to the user who merged this without provided attribution here. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:53, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Edgard Cirlin

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Edgard Cirlin · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I would like to try editing it to see if I can get it to meet criteria to make it acceptable —Cjm900 (talk) 15:47, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

@Cjm900: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:30, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

@Cjm900: I suggest starting with reading and then citing sources like those found through this Google Books search. You might try using the Wikipedia citation tool for Google Books to make the citation process easier.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:35, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

@Cjm900: By the way, the article is now at Draft:Edgard Cirlin, not the original place you requested undeletion. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:09, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Philip Kapneck

• Draft:Philip Kapneck · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Photoloop, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Photoloop (talk) 22:10, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

I'm having trouble getting the original documents I've been waiting for - official letters from the state of Maryland. Someone is working on it and they say I could get them this month. These letters are official appointment letters. The subject of the entry stayed away from the media throughout his 40 year tenure, so that is why there is almost nothing in the mainstream media about him, that I can find, especially online. Just because he wasn't in the media doesn't make him irrelevant or not noteworthy, IMO. He was instrumental in creating many tens of thousands of jobs in the state of Maryland. (I'm just explaining the reason I'm persisting with this). I will make an edit to the page as soon as I can, and follow up on the official documents to get a status in the coming week. Thank you for reviewing this. —Photoloop (talk) 22:17, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

@Photoloop: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:28, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

I haven't looked at the draft except in passing. Just be aware regarding the sources you're speaking of above that they must be "published" sources to be used. However, this is interpreted quite liberally—stated in the verifiability policy to mean: "made available to the public in some form" – so they must reasonably available for others to access and read themselves (so they can't be, for example, like the plans for demolishing the Earth in Hitchiker's Guide, that were posted "in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory" in the cellar of a building that had no lights and broken stairs "with a sign on the door saying 'Beware of The Leopard'"). Also, those sound like primary sources, which can be used for verification purposes, but do nothing to demonstrate notability. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:40, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Tony Lakatos

• Tony Lakatos · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Requesting Userfication of A7'ed article. Lakatos is in standard jazz encyclopedias. Deleting admin no longer active. —Chubbles (talk) 08:54, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

@Chubbles:  Done See User:Chubbles/Tony Lakatos.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:57, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Aleta Ogord.jpg

• File:Aleta Ogord.jpg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The current version of this file should be used at Aleta Ogord, not the March 2008 version at File:A.O..jpg. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:25, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

@GeoffreyT2000: It isn't clear what you want done. File:Aleta Ogord.jpg has two versions, a larger one and a smaller one. The larger one is the current version at the moment. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:08, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Johnston diagram

• Johnston diagram · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Currently researching the various/many kinds of Venn diagram derivatives, I found occasional (secondary) references to a "Johnston" or "exclusion diagram" type, however, so far I could not clearly identify the original primary work(s) introducing this diagram (apparently several decades ago). Before overwriting our PRODed article on Johnston diagrams by a redirect to "Venn diagram", I'd like to have a look at the previous contents in order to see if it contains useful info which could help to either establish a better stand-alone article or could be incorporated into the Venn diagram article. Therefore, please undelete the previous article. Thanks. —Matthiaspaul (talk) 22:07, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

@Matthiaspaul: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:04, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Eúgèñė

• Eúgēñė · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Eu'gêñė 01:26, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

1. What im saying is my templetes set to progress for reference concerns
2. Why speedy delete
3. An im having reuest to use material issues

— Preceding unsigned comment added by IVFiPodTouch (talk • contribs) 01:26, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

 Not done. It was speedily deleted because it was a test page posted in main article space. There is no value to Wikipedia in restoring test pages (this one was 3 or 4 words with many underscore characters). Please use your own sandbox. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:02, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

User:ㅂㄱㅇ

• User:ㅂㄱㅇ · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please undelete my user page and move it to User:ㅂㄱㅇ/up without redirect. I proposed to delete this page, but I want it now. —ㅂㄱㅇ (talk) (Bieup Giyeok Ieung) 09:04, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Done. ℯxplicit 11:43, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:EnviroVent

• Draft:EnviroVent · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Adamslinger, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Adam Slinger (talk) 09:07, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

@Adamslinger: First would you please publicly identify your association with EnviroVent on your user page? See WP:PAID for information on this. When you created an account here, you entered into a legal agreement to abide by Wikimedia:Terms of Use, which requires you to disclose any paid editing. At the moment, it seems you aren't in compliance with that agreement. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:14, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DN Capital

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DN Capital · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Bradraener, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bradraener (talk) 15:10, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

@Bradraener: First, see WP:PAID and comply with it if it applies to you.

Unfortunately:

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Jimfbleak (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:18, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

@Bradraener: You could go to deletion review as Anachronist suggests, but since the article is locked because it was speedy deleted as spam three times, you are unlikely to get much joy there. Better to write as a draft in a sandbox and then request unlocking if it's acceptable. You must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines, write in a non-promotional tone and declare any conflict of interest especially under WP:PAID Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Judith Love Cohen

• Draft:Judith Love Cohen · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Would like to pass along the draft to the individual's family as she is now deceased and then click the "Save page" button below —Krsanders25 (talk) 16:39, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

@Krsanders25:  Done, I just restored it. The draft will exist for another six months and then be deleted again if no one comes along and tries to get it into shape for publication in main article space. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:21, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Senandung Nacita

• Senandung Nacita · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please let me retrieve my writing about Senandung Nacita. This article was different to the previous one. I have not been given a chance to dispute the deletion request. —180.254.179.185 (talk) 23:58, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Holoverse

• Holoverse · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I did request on the thread with those monitoring it that it be left up for a couple of weeks so I can further work on it to get it up to scratch. I had already been told that the second review I had done of it had fixed a lot of the original things. I just need a little bit more time to get the referencing done in correct formatting. I am a donor, love Wikipedia, and have just started working for this company who have asked me to do their Wiki page for them. I was most of the way there when it was taken down. So I would appreciate a couple of weeks more to work on the content so it can be to your liking and added to the encyclopedia. Please allow it back up for that time. Many thanks. Simon —SBanks82 (talk) 06:26, 9 May 2017 (UTC)