User talk:LuK3

Not to be confused with fellow Wikipedian Luk3.

FL:
GA:
DYK:

PC | UAA | AIV | RFPP | AN | AN/I | RFA | ACCG | Filter Log | Admin Dashboard | SPI

ACC access

Hello Luke, I have unsuspended your account and welcome back, please subscribe to the ACC mailing list here, and IRC channel access will be set as soon as I can find someone to do it :P. Again welcome back P. S. Please review the guide as alot has changed. Mlpearc (open channel) 17:37, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

I've re-added the account creator right to your account. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:33, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi!

Hi sorry I didnt know that was unreferenced since I was given the task by one of the people involed. I was hust paid to edit that. Sorry! Indiedesole (talk) 00:49, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

@Indiedesole: A few things. Number one, please read Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people, especially the policy on verifiability. You have to cite any additions to articles, especially of living people. In addition, you stated you were given the task of editing the article. You may want to read Wikipedia's policy about conflicts of interests. In addition, I'm not saying you are, however if you are paid for your contributions, you must disclose who is paying you. If you have any questions, feel free to reply back. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:56, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

About a page deletion

Hello LuK3,

I receive you massage right now and you ask me that not to remove Articles for deletion notice from a page but the problem is now I want to stop the discussion what I proposed as it take too long to delete the page so I want to apply speed deletion for the page.Now the problem I don't find any way to delete this page.Can you help me please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thikthik15 (talk • contribs) 13:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

@Thikthik15: I have closed your AfD nomination. Only administrators can delete articles. I highly recommend reading Wikipedia's deletion policy if you want to see if an article should be deleted. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:23, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

ACC

Hello Luke, can you fill me in on why acc:176483 is on hold? ~riley (talk) 23:38, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Riley, it looks like I was going to work on that request later, but unfortunately didn't have time. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

In the future please break reservation, this would have saved a five day delay in response which is unacceptable. ~riley (talk) 01:04, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Jim Miklaszewski

Source conflict? Does not adhere? http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/jim-miklaszewski-retiring-from-nbc-news/291405

AdWeek is a reputable industry publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wxjunkie0 (talk • contribs) 14:32, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Wxjunkie0, thanks for the note. I read over that article and it seems to be a reliable source to be included in the BLP article. If you need any help with adding the information, feel free to message me back! -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:35, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

I'm not retyping everything you deleted. Thanks for wasting my time. Wxjunkie0 (talk) 14:37, 18 July 2016 (UTC)wxjunkie

@Wxjunkie0: here is the diff to the edit you made, if you want to re-edit the article. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:40, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Faiz Syed for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Faiz Syed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faiz Syed until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. for (;;) (talk) 14:22, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

American Solidarity Party

I see that you have supported deletion of the entry for the American Solidarity Party. The party has only become really active in the last couple of months - but membership has grown and there are now chapters in a number of states, a central committee was formed in early July, and folks are working to get on as many ballots as possible for this fall.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1CBGJpQYqOThtl1WBxXoeBv3LH_HDv1nLSVZiQjvEwLY/edit#gid=0

In addition, the party has now gotten mention in First Things - http://www.firstthings.com/tag/american-solidarity-party.

Please reconsider your vote to delete for now as the Party is seeking to grow.

Thank you.

Lee Strong — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.101.178.225 (talk) 15:08, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello Luke

I was on Ernest simons page and I was writing about his current occupation and you changed it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.56.84.177 (talk) 00:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for your hard work of trying to prevent vandalism on Harvest from making unrecoverable damage! NasssaNser 04:12, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you NasssaNser, much appreciated! -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:35, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Unblock

Hi LuK3,

I'm trying to edit my supervisor's, Dr. Ellen J Kennedy's,Wikipedia page and was blocked. I'm confused as to how to unblock it. All I would like to do is put in her vita.

Ellen J Kennedy (talk) 14:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, it doesn't seem like you were blocked. I did, however, revert your edits on the Ellen J. Kennedy. I reverted it for a few reasons. Editors are strongly discouraged to edit articles in which there is a Conflicts of interest. In your case, you are editing the article because she is your supervisor. In addition, contributions on Wikipedia must adhere to the policies on adhering to a neutral point of view and verifiability. If you have any other questions, feel free to reply! -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Changed language to be more editorial

Hi,

 You flagged my wiki page creation and I heavily edited it to reflect acceptable WIKI guidelines. Please confirm that my updated page is acceptable.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elcorcor (talk • contribs) 23:48, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello Elcorcor, unfortunately the page was deleted because it didn't conform to some Wikipedia policies. However, I created User:Elcorcor/Highland Technology so you can work on the article without having it deleted. I'm going to try and get the deleting administrator to get the information from the deleted article onto that draft. If you have any other questions, feel free to reply back. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:17, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

politics

Содержит анти правительственную пропоганду. На английском языке преподносится информация, как афера исключително Путина и Януковича, хотя это не так. Даная афера характерна для многих стран и не только указанных президентов. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carousel_voting — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.252.151.129 (talk) 17:10, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Chris Koster

He is a corrupt career politician though? Takes 3.2 million of missouri taxpayer money to redecorate his damn office? And got a big write-up in the New York Times for his corruption? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.210.160 (talk) 15:47, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

You have removed valid content

You have removed my valid additions several times against Wikipedia's rules. If you do not stop I will have your editing privileges banned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:83E8:CE20:B582:2083:5BB4:290E (talk) 22:13, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

If you believe something needs a citation add "citation needed." you ate not allowed to remove content simply because a citation is not provided. Right now it appears you are removing relevant information which follows Wikipedia's guidelines because you disagree with it politically.

Please read WP:UNSOURCED in addition to WP:NPOV. The policy allows me to remove any information that is not directly supported by an inline source. -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:05, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	! Bot 000010000111100001011 KnowEverythingEdits (talk) 18:58, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Daniel (Dano) Cerny

First, I have no conflict of interest per my interest in Mr. Daniel (Dano) Cerny. I am a colleague, but I am not being compensated for my interest in any way. I just want to see that your Wiki information is accurate.

The problem is that there are two pages regarding Mr. Cerny and his work.

The original page, entitled Daniel Cerny, is not well-referenced and it is very out of date:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Cerny

The second page, entitled Dano Cerny, is well-referenced, reasonably accurate and most importantly, up-to-date:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dano_Cerny

Can the second page be deleted, or at the very least appended to the first Dano Cerny page?

Thank you in advance for your consideration.

Ptc81 (talk) 00:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello. According to your edit summaries, it looks like you have some sort of connection to the subject, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Also, biographies of living people are held to a high standard of verifiability, among other things. In addition, the second page is going through a deletion discussion, they will decide on the fate of the article there. If you have any other questions, feel free to reply. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Are you able to clarify why the second 'Dano Cerny' article may be deleted? What is the potential problem? Thank you again. Ptc81 (talk) 18:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

According to the discussion, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dano Cerny, it looks like editors are concerned about the notability of the subject. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:17, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Designer Genes

I do hope you're an admin. I've been reverting several more infarctions by Deigner Genes as you can see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Designer_genes

After his last warning as well. Forgive me for not knowing better how to respond but to revert. 66.191.15.94 (talk) 00:28, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice. I just saw that they have been reported over at AIV. Thanks for letting me know. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:30, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

I changed the description for a reason.

It is proven fact that Adam Kokesh was only a civil officer in the USMC. Whom ever created this page (probably him) made his service in the USMC bigger than it truly is. What else do you need to know?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:3CE7:7200:396D:226C:15A8:8C20 (talk) 23:58, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

The information is sourced and you simply cannot remove information. Please go to the article talk page to discuss your changes. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:04, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Want to help test advanced new tools planned for Recent Changes?

Hi LuK3! I’m reaching out to you because our logs tell us you’re an active Twinkle new user welcomer. The WMF Collaboration team is working on new tools that we hope will be useful to people engaged in reviewing recent changes, fighting vandalism or supporting new users. We want to test them for usability with editors who are experienced with relevant wiki work. If you’re interested in helping to shape this new technology—we’d like to hear from you.

The testing should take about an hour, will be conducted online, and will take place during the next few weeks. To participate, please email dchen[at]wikimedia.org with the subject line Twinkle Welcomer. Include the following information:

• Username

• Email where we can reach you

• Your city or time zone

• Best time to talk to you

• Your primary use(s) of Twinkle or Recent Changes (e.g., reviewing recent changes, reviewing with a particular focus (specify), anti-vandalism, new-page review, welcoming new users, etc.)

Thanks! Dchen (WMF) (talk) 20:49, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Warning!

You have reverted articles such as talk page of x86 and userpage of Jeh for more than 3 times! If you continue doing that, you would be blocked from editing on Wikipedia.org! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Counterjeh (talk • contribs) 01:39, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Read WP:3RRNO. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:40, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

You deleted my things and it messed up my stuff 😭 Gamebøy6567YT (talk) 00:42, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Please read WP:UPNOT about what shouldn't be on your userpage. Promotional content is not allowed in the userspace or in the mainspace. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:49, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

$1.00 XD

Cad315 (talk) 02:23, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Legend of Warsaw

This wasn't an WP:CSD#A11, because that requires a "plain indication" that the subject was "invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally". Just being apparently made-up isn't enough. In fact, this legend wasn't made up, at least not recently - it is described at Warsaw#Etymology and names, and I have redirected the page to that, and told the author why. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks John. I did retroactively see Mermaid of Warsaw and should not tagged the article, rather a redirect. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer granted

Hello LuK3. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as mark pages as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

• Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
• Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
• Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. — xaosflux ^Talk 03:20, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Xaosflux, I appreciate it. -- LuK3 (Talk) 03:21, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Coca-Cola Zero Sugar

Hello, is there any source that says that Coca-Cola Zero is just getting renamed? It appear that right now it's only Europe and it looks like it's also been reformulated. Let me know. Thanks TheUSConservative (talk) 02:54, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

I see an article from The Independent in the UK and Business Insider. It looks like it a reformulation of the Coca-Cola Zero however I'm not too sure it is replacing the old soda. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:57, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

So then I feel like a new article is warranted for the time being. Do you agree? If so could you help expand it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheUSConservative (talk • contribs) 03:11, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I would like to wait a little bit until there are some more reliable sources reporting on it. I'd be willing to help you on expanding it, just drop me a line. Thanks! -- LuK3 (Talk) 03:13, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

If you could help me find a logo or something with the logo on it. Maybe also with new information as well. Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheUSConservative (talk • contribs) 03:16, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, LuK3. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter

Hello LuK3,

Breaking the back of the backlog

We now have 801 New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action.

Mid July to 01 Oct 2016

If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Second set of eyes

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.

Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.

---

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Wild tic-tac-toe, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Meatsgains (talk) 02:56, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))

New Page Review - newsletter #2

Hello LuK3,

Please help reduce the New Page backlog

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.

Getting the tools we need

ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE

• Improve the tools: Vote here.
• Reduce your review load: Vote here

---

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .

Thank You

For catching and promptly tagging the G10 attack page. The vigilance of editors like you helps keep the project running smoothly. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Ad Orientem, I appreciate the kind words. Congratulations on your new bit and best of luck in the upcoming year! -- LuK3 (Talk) 04:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Abdulhadi al Khawaja

The claim he is a "human rights defender" is as verifiable as the claim that he is a terrorist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.30.24.130 (talk) 18:32, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year, LuK3!

Happy New Year!

LuK3,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Donner60 (talk) 04:16, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Thank you, best of wishes for the new year to you as well! -- LuK3 (Talk) 04:19, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Thanks for reviewing the Bernice Steinbaum page. Netherzone (talk) 00:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Not a problem! -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy birthday!

Warm regards, Mz7 (talk) 05:35, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much :). -- LuK3 (Talk) 06:11, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Sorry I didn't know. I've made the articles just because someone asked me if can have a information about that in macedonian language so I didn't know how. Sorry again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hgfvghdy (talk • contribs) 18:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

No worries, did you happen to check out the Macedonian Wikipedia? They may have better resources or articles to edit for you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:56, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Do we want to put in a AIV for Andrew0813?

He hasn't done any more vandalism after the final warning I gave him, but I'm pretty sure its a vandalism-only account. Also looking at his contribs, I see that he takes his time in editing, so he may be back in an hour or two to do more destructive harm to Civil War articles. Was wondering what your thoughts on the subject were. Thanks. L3X1 (talk) 17:51, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, I think reporting them to AIV would be the best course of action. There has been no constructive edits from the user. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:54, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Ok, will do. L3X1 (talk) 17:55, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

The cliche is dead. Long live the cliche!

It's a-waiting..

You're not an admin? This poll from a while back suggests you'd do really well, so the question is - do you still want to run the gauntlet, and when? -- Samtar ^{talk · contribs} 21:57, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

@Samtar: I still want to run however due to this being my last semester at school and work I don't think I'll be as active. Perhaps see me over at WP:RFA in a few months :). -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Ah understandable! Well I look forward to seeing you there :) -- Samtar ^{talk · contribs} 08:57, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Anti-Spam Barnstar
		Thank you much for your efforts fighting spam as you did recently with Www.dlightseventcatering.co.uk! --Non-Dropframe talk 02:21, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

@Non-dropframe: Thank you very much. Thank you for your anti-vandalism fighting as well. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:22, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

😤

I already edited it Gamebøy6567YT (talk) 00:48, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.2

Hello LuK3,

A HUGE backlog

We now have 801 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

Hitting 17,000 soon

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.

Abuse

This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and

1. this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
2. this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
3. This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.

---

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.3

Hello LuK3,

Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.

Still a MASSIVE backlog

We now have 801 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.

---

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Dreaded 45 day list @ ACC

Hello, just here to remind you to login to the ACC interface, you're on the dreaded 45 day list. Thanx, - Mlpearc (open channel) 16:37, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, I've been busy IRL but I'll try to get back into the groove of things. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:43, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

RFA time

I think it's time for another RFA after RFAP opinion polls suggest you have a high chance of passing lately.

KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 11:12, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your offer, however I would like to wait a little bit longer. I have not been as active as I should be. I want to get more active once the summer hits so we'll wait until then. Thank you again. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:53, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

No problem :) KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 23:19, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

I've deleted the RfA per WP:CSD#G7 so a fresh one can be started up nearer the time. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 16:06, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

About becoming an administrator

Wikipedia needs you! Take the poll.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia so far; they are very much appreciated. Your experience and tenure have been an asset to the project.

Have you ever thought of becoming an administrator? It can be enjoyable, challenging, and a great way to help Wikipedia.

If you would like to find out about your chances of a successful RfA, please visit:

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll

Thank you!

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

The same thing

It would probably be easier to use WP:SOCIALMEDIA when it comes to use of social media as a reference. Rather than an explanatory supplement, as so. Just a tip. :) Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 00:57, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

I've always used the WP:FACEBOOK and alike for social media and reliable sources. However I will use your suggestion in future edit summaries about social media references. Thanks! :) -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks

Just saying thanks for earlier. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 02:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Not a problem, we all encounter those vandals from time to time :). -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:38, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

lol, year and a half for this one. Never gives up. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 02:39, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Cumulus Media

Hi LuK3,

We wanted to correct the narrative for Cumulus Media. Here is the correct data on the company:

A leader in the radio broadcasting industry, Cumulus Media (NASDAQ:CMLS) combines high-quality local programming with iconic, nationally syndicated media, sports and entertainment brands to deliver premium content choices to the 245 million people reached each week through its 447 owned-and-operated stations broadcasting in 90 US media markets (including eight of the top 10), more than 8,200 broadcast radio stations affiliated with its Westwood One network and numerous digital channels. Together, the Cumulus/Westwood One platforms make Cumulus Media one of the few media companies that can provide advertisers with national reach and local impact. Cumulus/Westwood One is the exclusive radio broadcast partner to some of the largest brands in sports, entertainment, news, and talk, including the NFL, the NCAA, the Masters, the Olympics, the GRAMMYs, the Academy of Country Music Awards, the American Music Awards, the Billboard Music Awards, Westwood One News, and more. Additionally, it is the nation's leading provider of country music and lifestyle content through its NASH brand, which serves country fans nationwide through radio programming, exclusive digital content, and live events.

How do I get that corrected? Lori LewisLorilewis1234567 (talk) 18:05, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

First off, it looks like you have a personal connection to Cumulus Media which violates Wikipedia's policy on conflicts of interest. The content you posted looks quite promotional in nature, which is also against Wikipedia's guidelines. You need to add material that is from a neutral point of view which is verified with reliable sources. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:09, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Erroneous and slanted information on the CranioSacral Therapy Page

In reading other Talks about this page, it appears that people who have been trying to update and correct misinformation on this page are not being allowed to do that. It appears editors who know very little about CST are choosing what is left up. I do not understand the coding for Wikipedia and it will take time for me to read all of that. In the meantime, why are you leaving erroneous slanted information on this page? CranioSacral Knowledge (talk) 23:50, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4

Hello LuK3,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 801 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Eric Decker

Sorry, I won't do it again — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CE4A:9B60:940A:33B5:449C:10F5 (talk) 15:18, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Eric Decker Guy

Sorry for editing Decker. I won't do it again. Have a good evening. 2602:306:CE4A:9B60:8522:E1B5:F10A:495C (talk) 22:28, 20 June 2017 (UTC)