Tazir: Difference between revisions
→Examples of Tazir offenses: Removing erroneous tag, citation does include this information |
Tag: references removed |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
==Tazir punishments == |
==Tazir punishments == |
||
Tazir punishments are common in Sharia courts for less serious offenses.<ref name=fh16/> Punishments vary with the nature of crime and include a prison term, flogging, a fine, banishment, and seizure of property. Execution is allowed in cases such as habitual homosexuality, practices which split the Muslim community, propagating heretical doctrines or espionage on behalf of an enemy of the Muslim state.<ref name=fh16/><ref>{{cite book | last=Terrill | first=Richard | title=World criminal justice systems : a comparative survey | publisher=Anderson Pub | year=2013 | isbn=978-1-4557-2589-2 | pages=562–563}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | title=Justice and human rights in Islamic law|author=Gerald E. Lampe | publisher=International Law Institute | location=Washington, D.C | year=1997 | isbn=978-0-03-532984-0 | page=88}}</ref> All four schools of ''[[fiqh]]'' (''[[Madhhab]]''), namely [[Hanafi]], [[Maliki]], [[Shafii]] and [[Hanbali]], permit the death penalty at the discretion of the state or ''Qadi'', for certain Tazir offenses. But traditionally Ta'zir often varied between schools of ''fiqh''. |
Tazir punishments are common in Sharia courts for less serious offenses.<ref name=fh16/> Punishments vary with the nature of crime and include a prison term, flogging, a fine, banishment, and seizure of property. In pre-modern Muslim societies, taʾzīr typically took the form of corporal punishment, and was calibrated according to the social status of the offender: higher-status offenders were usually given lighter punishments, on the grounds that loss of honor harmed them more than those of lower status. The sixteenth-century Egyptian jurist Ibn Nujaym said that taʾzīr could consist of lashing, slapping, rubbing the ears, a stern telling-off, disparagement short of slander, or an angry look from the judge. Execution is allowed in cases such as habitual homosexuality, practices which split the Muslim community, propagating heretical doctrines or espionage on behalf of an enemy of the Muslim state.<ref name=fh16/><ref>{{cite book | last=Terrill | first=Richard | title=World criminal justice systems : a comparative survey | publisher=Anderson Pub | year=2013 | isbn=978-1-4557-2589-2 | pages=562–563}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | title=Justice and human rights in Islamic law|author=Gerald E. Lampe | publisher=International Law Institute | location=Washington, D.C | year=1997 | isbn=978-0-03-532984-0 | page=88}}</ref> All four schools of ''[[fiqh]]'' (''[[Madhhab]]''), namely [[Hanafi]], [[Maliki]], [[Shafii]] and [[Hanbali]], permit the death penalty at the discretion of the state or ''Qadi'', for certain Tazir offenses. But traditionally Ta'zir often varied between schools of ''fiqh''. Hanafite and Shafi'ite ''fiqh'' allowed a judge sometimes to "rely on information personally acquired instead of independent testimony"—even in cases where the defendant faced capital punishment.<ref name=kadri-124/><ref>Baber Johansen, "Signs as Evidence: The Doctrine of Ibn Taymiyya 1263-1328) and Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya (d.1351) on Proof", ''Islamic Law and Society'', v.9, n.2 (2002), pp.175-76, 177-78</ref> Judges would use the difference in fiqh to the advantage of prosecution and disadvantage of the defendant. Malakite ''fiqh'' allowed for beating during interrogation if the defendant had a "bad reputation", and "an expansive approach to capital punishment" compared to other schools. At least during the fourteenth century non-Malakite judges "often" sent defendants to Malakite judges.<ref name=kadri-124>{{cite book|last1=Kadri|first1=Sadakat|title=Heaven on Earth: A Journey Through Shari'a Law from the Deserts of Ancient Arabia ...|date=2012|publisher=macmillan|isbn=9780099523277|page=124|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ztCRZOhJ10wC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Heaven+on+Earth:+A+Journey+Through+Shari%27a+Law&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAWoVChMIob7syrnZxwIVhg6SCh0fYg3Z#v=onepage&q=Heaven%20on%20Earth%3A%20A%20Journey%20Through%20Shari'a%20Law&f=false|}}</ref> |
||
their creditors were paid, for example.<ref>Ibn Rushd, ''Distinguished Jurist's Primer: A Translation of "Bidayat al-mujtahid."'', Translated by Imran Ahsan Khan Nyazee. Reading, 1994-6, 2:341-42</ref><ref name=kadri-124/> Hanafite and Shafi'ite ''fiqh'' allowed a judge sometimes to "rely on information personally acquired instead of independent testimony"—even in cases where the defendant faced capital punishment.<ref name=kadri-124/><ref>Baber Johansen, "Signs as Evidence: The Doctrine of Ibn Taymiyya 1263-1328) and Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya (d.1351) on Proof", ''Islamic Law and Society'', v.9, n.2 (2002), pp.175-76, 177-78</ref> Judges would use the difference in fiqh to the advantage of prosecution and disadvantage of the defendant. Malakite ''fiqh'' allowed for beating during interrogation if the defendant had a "bad reputation", and "an expansive approach to capital punishment" compared to other schools. At least during the fourteenth century non-Malakite judges "often" sent defendants to Malakite judges.<ref name=kadri-124>{{cite book|last1=Kadri|first1=Sadakat|title=Heaven on Earth: A Journey Through Shari'a Law from the Deserts of Ancient Arabia ...|date=2012|publisher=macmillan|isbn=9780099523277|page=124|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ztCRZOhJ10wC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Heaven+on+Earth:+A+Journey+Through+Shari%27a+Law&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAWoVChMIob7syrnZxwIVhg6SCh0fYg3Z#v=onepage&q=Heaven%20on%20Earth%3A%20A%20Journey%20Through%20Shari'a%20Law&f=false|}}</ref> |
|||
<ref>Rapport, Yossef "Legal Diversity in the Age of Taqlid: The Four Chief Qadis Under the Mamluks", ''Islamic Law and Society'', v.10, n.2 (2003), p.221</ref> |
<ref>Rapport, Yossef "Legal Diversity in the Age of Taqlid: The Four Chief Qadis Under the Mamluks", ''Islamic Law and Society'', v.10, n.2 (2003), p.221</ref> |
||
Revision as of 11:12, 31 October 2018
Part of a series on |
Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) |
---|
![]() |
Islamic studies |
In Islamic Law, tazir (or ta'zir, Arabic تعزير) refers to punishment for offenses at the discretion of the judge (Qadi) or ruler of the state.[1] It is one of three major types of punishments or sanctions under Sharia Islamic law — hadd, qisas and tazir.[2] The punishments for the hudud offenses are fixed by the Qur'an or Hadith[3] (i.e. "defined by God"[4]), qisas allow equal retaliation in cases of intentional bodily harm, while ta'zir refers to punishments applied to the other offenses for which no punishment is specified in the Qur'an or the Hadith.[5][6]
Overview
The classical Islamic legal tradition did not have a separate category for criminal law as does modern law.[6] The classical Islamic jurisprudence typically divided the subject matter of law into four "quarters", that is rituals, sales, marriage, and injuries.[2] In modern usage, Islamic criminal law has been extracted and collated from that classical Islamic jurisprudence literature into three categories of rules:[2]
- Hadd (literally "limit"[7]) under Sharia, are rules stated in the Quran and the Hadiths, and whose violation is deemed in Islam as a crime against God, and requires a fixed punishment. Hadd crimes include[8] theft (amputation of the hand), illicit sexual relations or rape (death by stoning or one hundred lashes), making unproven accusations of illicit sex (eighty lashes), drinking intoxicants like alcohol (eighty lashes), apostasy (death), and highway robbery (death).[5][9]
- Qisas, (literally "retaliation in kind"[10]) and diyya, دية) ("blood money"), in Islamic jurisprudence, are the second category of crimes, where Sharia specifies equal retaliation (qisas) or monetary compensation (diyya[11]), as a possible punishment. Included in this category is homicide, for example, which Islamic law treats as a civil dispute between believers.[12] Qisas principle is available against the accused, to the victim or victim's heirs, when a Muslim is murdered, suffers bodily injury or suffers property damage.[13] In the case of murder, qisas means the right of a murder victim's nearest relative or wali (ولي) (legal guardian) to, if the court approves, take the life of the killer.[14]
- Tazir (literally "to punish",[7] sometimes spelled as taazir, ti'zar, tazar, ta'azar) is the third category, and refers to offense mentioned in the Quran or the Hadiths, but where neither the Quran nor the Hadiths specify a punishment.[1][15] In Tazir cases, the punishment is at the discretion of the state, the ruler, or a qadi (kadi),[4][16] or court acting on behalf of the ruler.[2] Tazir punishment is for actions which are considered sinful in Islam, undermine the Muslim community, or a threaten public order during Islamic rule, but those that are not punishable as hadd or qisas crimes.[17] The legal restrictions on the exercise of that power are not specified in the Quran or the Hadiths, and vary.[5] Crimes punished by tazir do not require proof that hadd or qisas crimes require, such as four male Muslim witnesses. The judge enjoys considerable leeway in deciding an appropriate form of punishment, and the punishment does not have to be consistent across the accused persons or over time.[2][5] The ruler or qadi also has the discretion to forgive tazir offenses.[5]
Scripture
The word tazir is not used in the Quran or the Hadith, in the sense that modern Islamic criminal law uses it.[18] However, in several verses of the Quran, crimes are identified, punishment of the accused indicated, but no specific punishment is described. These instances led early Islamic scholars to interpret the Quran as requiring discretionary punishment of certain offenses, namely Tazir.[18] Example specific verses from the Quran that support taazir are,[18]
And as for the two who are guilty of indecency from among you, give them both a punishment; then if they repent and amend, turn aside from them; surely Allah is Oft-returning (to mercy), the Merciful.
And (as for) those who dispute about Allah after that obedience has been rendered to Him, their plea is null with their Lord, and upon them is wrath, and for them is severe punishment.
Examples of Tazir offenses
Tazir offenses are broadly grouped into two sub-categories in Islamic literature.[19] The first are those offenses that have the same nature but do not exactly meet the complete requirements of hudud crimes. Examples of such Tazir offenses include thefts among relatives, or attempted but unsuccessful robbery, attempted fornication witnessed by four male Muslims, and homosexual contacts such as kissing that does not result in fornication.[19][20] The second sub-category of Tazir offenses relate to offenses committed by an individual that violate the behavior demanded in the Quran and the Hadiths. Examples of the second sub-category include false testimony, loaning money or any property to another person for interest in addition to principal, any acts that threaten or damage the public order or Muslim community or Islam.[19][20]
The fourteenth century Islamic jurist Ibn Taymiyyah included any form of disobedience as a Tazir offense, and listed several examples where there is no legal penalty in Sharia:[21]
- the man who kisses a boy or a woman unrelated to him by marriage or a very near kinship;[21][need quotation to verify]
- the man who flirts without fornication;[21]
- the man who eats a forbidden thing like blood, or dead animal which suffers natural death, or meat that is slaughtered in an unlawful manner;[21]
- the man who steals a thing lying in open or one whose value is unclear;[21]
- the man who debases the commodities such as foodstuffs and clothes, or who gives short measure of capacity or weight;[21]
- the man who bears false witness or encourages others to bear false witness;[21]
- the judge who judges contrary to what Allah has enjoined;[21]
- the non-Muslim or Muslim engaged in espionage;[21]
- the nashiz woman who questions or is rude to her husband;[22]
- the man who questions Qadi's opinion or challenges the views of other Muslims;[21][need quotation to verify]
Numerous other offenses are included in Tazir category.[2][22]
Tazir punishments
Tazir punishments are common in Sharia courts for less serious offenses.[18] Punishments vary with the nature of crime and include a prison term, flogging, a fine, banishment, and seizure of property. In pre-modern Muslim societies, taʾzīr typically took the form of corporal punishment, and was calibrated according to the social status of the offender: higher-status offenders were usually given lighter punishments, on the grounds that loss of honor harmed them more than those of lower status. The sixteenth-century Egyptian jurist Ibn Nujaym said that taʾzīr could consist of lashing, slapping, rubbing the ears, a stern telling-off, disparagement short of slander, or an angry look from the judge. Execution is allowed in cases such as habitual homosexuality, practices which split the Muslim community, propagating heretical doctrines or espionage on behalf of an enemy of the Muslim state.[18][23][24] All four schools of fiqh (Madhhab), namely Hanafi, Maliki, Shafii and Hanbali, permit the death penalty at the discretion of the state or Qadi, for certain Tazir offenses. But traditionally Ta'zir often varied between schools of fiqh. Hanafite and Shafi'ite fiqh allowed a judge sometimes to "rely on information personally acquired instead of independent testimony"—even in cases where the defendant faced capital punishment.[25][26] Judges would use the difference in fiqh to the advantage of prosecution and disadvantage of the defendant. Malakite fiqh allowed for beating during interrogation if the defendant had a "bad reputation", and "an expansive approach to capital punishment" compared to other schools. At least during the fourteenth century non-Malakite judges "often" sent defendants to Malakite judges.[25] [27]
- Contemporary application
In some Islamic countries, such as Pakistan, rape is being treated as liable to Tazir.[28] For Tazir punishment for rape, the Pakistan law requires evidence that the woman resisted, that there is semen present on the woman, and that the man is potent; if the evidence confirms all these three requirements then the Tazir punishment under the Pakistan law is a fine, thirty lashes and/or imprisonment for up to 10 years for the convicted.[28] In cases, where the judge discretionarily decides that the evidence is insufficient, the rape victim can be tried on charges of false accusation, under both hadd and tazir rules of Pakistan law.[28][29]
Brunei introduced Tazir into its Syariah Penal Code Order effective 2014. Tazir crimes in Brunei now include offenses such as failing to perform Friday prayers by anyone above 15 years old, any Muslim disrespecting the month of Ramadan, and khalwat (dating or any form of close proximity between unrelated members of opposite sex).[30]
Iran introduced Tazir into its legal code after the 1979 Revolution, naming the section as Qanon-e Tazir. These Tazir laws allow prosecution of offenses such as illicit kissing, failing to wear proper head dress such as hejab, and making critical statements against judges and members of the Council of Guardians.[31]
See also
Further reading
- Wael Hallaq (2009), An introduction to Islamic law. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521678735.
References
- ^ a b Tazir Oxford Islamic Studies, Oxford University Press
- ^ a b c d e f Mark Cammack (2012), Islamic Law and Crime in Contemporary Courts, BERKELEY J. OF MIDDLE EASTERN & ISLAMIC LAW, Vol. 4, No.1, pp. 1-7
- ^ "Hadd" Oxford Islamic Studies
- ^ a b Wasti, Tahir (2009). The application of Islamic criminal law in Pakistan Sharia in practice. Brill Academic. p. xix, 72–73. ISBN 978-90-04-17225-8.
- ^ a b c d e Mohamed S. El-Awa (1993). Punishment In Islamic Law. American Trust Publications. pp. 1–68. ISBN 978-0892591428.
- ^ a b Wael Hallaq (2009), SHARI’A: THEORY, PRACTICE, TRANSFORMATIONS, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0521678742, pp. 309, 551-558
- ^ a b Smith, Sidonie (Editor) (1998). Women, Autobiography, Theory : a Reader. University of Wisconsin Press. p. 124. ISBN 978-0-299-15844-6.
{{cite book}}
:|last=
has generic name (help) - ^ "Hadd" Oxford Islamic Studies, Oxford University Press
- ^ Silvia Tellenbach (2015). The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Law (Ed: Markus D. Dubber and Tatjana Hornle). Oxford University Press. pp. 251–253. ISBN 978-0199673599.
- ^ Mohamed S. El-Awa (1993), Punishment In Islamic Law, American Trust Publications, ISBN 978-0892591428
- ^ Christie S. Warren, Islamic Criminal Law, Oxford University Press, Qisas
- ^ Wasti, Tahir (2009). The application of Islamic criminal law in Pakistan Sharia in practice. Brill Academic. pp. 283–288. ISBN 978-90-04-17225-8.
- ^ Tahir Wasti (2009), The Application of Islamic Criminal Law in Pakistan: Sharia in Practice, Brill Academic, ISBN 978-9004172258, pp. 12-13
- ^ Encyclopædia Britannica, Qisas (2012)
- ^ Wasti, Tahir (2009). The application of Islamic criminal law in Pakistan Sharia in practice. Brill Academic. p. xix. ISBN 978-90-04-17225-8.
- ^ "Qadi" Encyclopædia Britannica
- ^ Burns, Jonathan (2013). Introduction to Islamic law : principles of civil, criminal, and international law under the Shari'a. p. 121. ISBN 978-0-9845182-5-8.
- ^ a b c d e Hakeem, Farrukh (2012). Policing Muslim communities comparative international context. New York: Springer. pp. 16–20. ISBN 978-1-4614-3551-8.
- ^ a b c Criminal Law in Islam, The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World, Oxford Islamic Studies, Oxford University Press (2013)
- ^ a b Bassiouni, M (1982). The Islamic criminal justice system (Ta'azir Crimes chapter). London New York: Oceana Publications. ISBN 978-0-379-20749-1.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Omar A. Farrukh (1969). Ibn Taimiyya on Public and Private Law in Islam or Public Policy in Islamic Jurisprudence. pp. 92–97.
- ^ a b Boğaç Ergene (2009). Judicial practice : institutions and agents in the Islamic world. Leiden: Brill Academic. pp. 266–267. ISBN 978-90-04-17934-9.
- ^ Terrill, Richard (2013). World criminal justice systems : a comparative survey. Anderson Pub. pp. 562–563. ISBN 978-1-4557-2589-2.
- ^ Gerald E. Lampe (1997). Justice and human rights in Islamic law. Washington, D.C: International Law Institute. p. 88. ISBN 978-0-03-532984-0.
- ^ a b Kadri, Sadakat (2012). Heaven on Earth: A Journey Through Shari'a Law from the Deserts of Ancient Arabia ... macmillan. p. 124. ISBN 9780099523277.
{{cite book}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|1=
(help) - ^ Baber Johansen, "Signs as Evidence: The Doctrine of Ibn Taymiyya 1263-1328) and Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya (d.1351) on Proof", Islamic Law and Society, v.9, n.2 (2002), pp.175-76, 177-78
- ^ Rapport, Yossef "Legal Diversity in the Age of Taqlid: The Four Chief Qadis Under the Mamluks", Islamic Law and Society, v.10, n.2 (2003), p.221
- ^ a b c Mehdi, Rubya (2015). Islamization of the law in Pakistan. Routledge. pp. 122–126. ISBN 978-1-138-91272-4.
- ^ Charles H. Kennedy (1988). "Islamization in Pakistan: Implementation of the Hudood Ordinances". Asian Survey. 28 (3). University of California Press: 307–316. doi:10.1525/as.1988.28.3.01p0147q. JSTOR 2644489.
- ^ Basuni, Izzuddin (2014-05-17). "Ta'zir offences explained". The Brunei Times. Archived from the original on 2015-05-18. Retrieved 2015-05-09.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ Cronin, Stephanie (2004). Reformers and revolutionaries in modern Iran : new perspectives on the Iranian left. Routledge. p. 273. ISBN 978-0-415-57344-3.